Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Melanoma , Cohort Studies , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Family history of melanoma is a major melanoma risk factor. However, self-reported family histories for some cancers, including melanoma, are commonly inaccurate. We used a unique database, the Utah Population Database (UPDB), as well as the Utah Cancer Registry to determine the accuracy of self-reported family history of melanoma in a large cohort of high-risk patients. Patient charts were reviewed and compared to records in the UPDB and the UCR to confirm personal and family history of melanoma in 1780 patients enrolled in a total body photography monitoring program. Self-reported family history of melanoma in first-degree relatives had an overall sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 79%, PPV of 31%, and NPV of 95%, with decreased accuracy (PPV) for second-degree relatives. A personal history of melanoma was the only factor significantly associated with accuracy in self-reported family history of melanoma. Patient age, sex, estimated nevus count, and number of prior personal melanomas were not significant predictors. Dermatologists should educate patients on the differences between melanomas, keratinocyte carcinomas, and pre-cancers. Confirming self-reported family history of melanoma may improve risk assessment for patients undergoing screening.
Subject(s)
Family Health , Melanoma/genetics , Self Report/standards , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Age Factors , Data Accuracy , Databases, Factual , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medical Records , Melanoma/pathology , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , UtahABSTRACT
Total body photography (TBP) facilitates early melanoma detection, but long-term outcomes have not been well studied. Our objectives were to examine melanoma diagnoses, role of TBP-associated follow-up visits, and survival in patients monitored by TBP. A total of 1955 patients meeting inclusion criteria received TBP from 2004-2013 at a single academic center. We compared the melanoma diagnoses and overall survival of 1253 patients with any follow-up visits (median, three visits; range, 1-18) and 702 patients with no follow-up visits. Use of TBP photographs influenced decision to biopsy 66 of 121 (54.5%) melanomas diagnosed after TBP. Lower invasive melanoma Breslow depth was significantly associated with having one or more follow-up visit (median, 0.83 vs 0.33 mm; P = .002) and photographic review (median, 0.31 vs 0.48 mm; P = 0.02). In multivariable analyses, greater overall survival was significantly associated with having one or more follow-up visit after TBP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.91; P < 0.032) and having more than 100 nevi (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.64; P = 0.004). Worse overall survival was significantly associated with increasing age (HR per year, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08; P < 0.001) and male sex (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.48-4.73; P = 0.001). Thus, monitoring by TBP was associated with subsequent melanoma diagnoses of lower stage and depth and greater overall survival.