ABSTRACT
The classical model of hematopoiesis established in the mouse postulates that lymphoid cells originate from a founder population of common lymphoid progenitors. Here, using a modeling approach in humanized mice, we showed that human lymphoid development stemmed from distinct populations of CD127- and CD127+ early lymphoid progenitors (ELPs). Combining molecular analyses with in vitro and in vivo functional assays, we demonstrated that CD127- and CD127+ ELPs emerged independently from lympho-mono-dendritic progenitors, responded differently to Notch1 signals, underwent divergent modes of lineage restriction, and displayed both common and specific differentiation potentials. Whereas CD127- ELPs comprised precursors of T cells, marginal zone B cells, and natural killer (NK) and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), CD127+ ELPs supported production of all NK cell, ILC, and B cell populations but lacked T potential. On the basis of these results, we propose a "two-family" model of human lymphoid development that differs from the prevailing model of hematopoiesis.
Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Killer Cells, Natural/metabolism , Lymphoid Progenitor Cells/metabolism , Lymphopoiesis/genetics , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , B-Lymphocytes/cytology , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit/deficiency , Interleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit/genetics , Interleukin-7 Receptor alpha Subunit/genetics , Interleukin-7 Receptor alpha Subunit/metabolism , Killer Cells, Natural/cytology , Lymphoid Progenitor Cells/cytology , Lymphoid Progenitor Cells/transplantation , Male , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, Knockout , Mice, SCID , Middle Aged , Stem Cell Transplantation , T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Transplantation, Heterologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A single-group, phase 1-2 study indicated that eltrombopag improved the efficacy of standard immunosuppressive therapy that entailed horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine in patients with severe aplastic anemia. METHODS: In this prospective, investigator-led, open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of horse ATG plus cyclosporine with or without eltrombopag as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia. The primary end point was a hematologic complete response at 3 months. RESULTS: Patients were assigned to receive immunosuppressive therapy (Group A, 101 patients) or immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag (Group B, 96 patients). The percentage of patients who had a complete response at 3 months was 10% in Group A and 22% in Group B (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 7.8; P = 0.01). At 6 months, the overall response rate (the percentage of patients who had a complete or partial response) was 41% in Group A and 68% in Group B. The median times to the first response were 8.8 months (Group A) and 3.0 months (Group B). The incidence of severe adverse events was similar in the two groups. With a median follow-up of 24 months, a karyotypic abnormality that was classified as myelodysplastic syndrome developed in 1 patient (Group A) and 2 patients (Group B); event-free survival was 34% and 46%, respectively. Somatic mutations were detected in 29% (Group A) and 31% (Group Β) of the patients at baseline; these percentages increased to 66% and 55%, respectively, at 6 months, without affecting the hematologic response and 2-year outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of eltrombopag to standard immunosuppressive therapy improved the rate, rapidity, and strength of hematologic response among previously untreated patients with severe aplastic anemia, without additional toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis and others; RACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02099747; EudraCT number, 2014-000363-40.).
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/therapy , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Benzoates/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia, Aplastic/drug therapy , Anemia, Aplastic/genetics , Antilymphocyte Serum/adverse effects , Benzoates/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Receptors, Thrombopoietin/agonists , Remission Induction , Young AdultABSTRACT
Systemic steroids are the standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), but â¼50% of patients become steroid-refractory or dependent (SR/D). Ruxolitinib is the only Food and Drug Administration- and European Medicines Agency-approved therapy for patients with SR/D aGVHD. In the phase 3 REACH2 trial (NCT02913261), ruxolitinib demonstrated superior efficacy in SR/D aGVHD, with a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) on day 28, durable ORR on day 56, and longer median overall survival compared with the best available therapy (BAT). Identifying biomarkers and clinical characteristics associated with increased probability of response can guide treatment decisions. In this exploratory analysis of the REACH2 study (first biomarker study), we developed baseline (pretreatment) and day 14 models to identify patient characteristics and biomarkers (12 aGVHD-associated cytokines/chemokines, 6 immune cell types, and 3 inflammatory proteins) before and during treatment, which affected the probability of response at day 28. Treatment with ruxolitinib, conditioning, skin involvement, and age were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of response in the ≥1 model. Lower levels of most aGVHD and immune cell markers at baseline were associated with an increased probability of response. In the day 14 model, levels of aGVHD markers at day 14, rather than changes from baseline, affected the probability of response. For both models, the bias-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic values (baseline, 0.73; day 14, 0.80) indicated a high level of correspondence between the fitted and actual outcomes. Our results suggest potential prognostic value of selected biomarkers and patient characteristics.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Acute Disease , Biomarkers , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Prognosis , Steroids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) are susceptible to complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis and thrombosis. Factor H (FH) is the main regulator of the complement alternative pathway, which protects cells from unwanted complement-mediated damage. Although FH is not a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked molecule, it may play a role in PNH. We sought to determine if rare germline variants in complement factor H (CFH) affect the PNH course, screening 84 patients with PNH treated with eculizumab for rare variants in CFH, CFI, and C3 genes. We compared the allelic frequencies with populational data and a geographically-matched control group, looking for an association between presence of the variants and treatment response (transfusion independence by 6 months). Sixteen patients presented rare variants, 9 in CFH (10.7%). Germline CFH variants were more frequent among patients with PNH than among controls (P = .02) or public data (P < .001) and were more likely to be transfusion-dependent at 6 months after eculizumab initiation (P = .015). With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 8 of 9 patients with the CFH variant received transfusions, and 2 developed thromboses. None of the patients with the CFH variant had severe aplastic anemia from eculizumab initiation until 6 months. We demonstrated for the first time that rare CFH variants are over-represented among patients with PNH and that germline genetic background may affect the response to eculizumab.
Subject(s)
Complement Factor H , Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal , Thrombosis , Humans , Anemia, Aplastic , Complement Factor H/genetics , Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal/drug therapy , Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal/genetics , HemolysisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: For the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first complete remission (CR) is preferred. However, whether the number of courses required to achieve CR has a prognostic impact is unclear. It is unknown which factors remain important in patients requiring more than one course of induction to attain remission. METHODS: This Acute Leukaemia Working Party study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation identified adults who received an allograft in first CR from either a fully matched sibling or 10/10 or 9/10 human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, or HLA-DQ). Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify the prognostic impact of one or two courses of induction to attain CR. RESULTS: A total of 4995 patients were included with 3839 (77%) patients attaining a CR following one course of induction chemotherapy (IND1), and 1116 patients requiring two courses (IND2) to attain CR. IND2 as compared to IND1 was a poor prognostic factor in a univariate analysis and remained so in a multivariate Cox model, resulting in an increased hazard ratio of relapse (1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.64; p = .0003) and of death (1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47; p = .002). Adverse prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis of the outcomes of patients requiring IND2 included age, FLT3-ITD, adverse cytogenetics, and performance status. Pretransplant measurable residual disease retained a prognostic impact regardless of IND1 or IND2. CONCLUSION: Initial response to chemotherapy as determined by number of courses to attain CR, retained prognostic relevance even following SCT in CR.
Subject(s)
HLA Antigens , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Remission Induction , Siblings , Unrelated Donors , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Female , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Prognosis , HLA Antigens/immunology , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare, usually refractory, and fatal diseases. Case series have suggested that allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) might improve the prognosis of advanced-stage CTCLs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of allogeneic HSCT compared with non-HSCT therapy on the outcome of individuals with advanced-stage CTCLs. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, matched controlled trial, conducted at 30 hospitals, participants with advanced CTCLs were allocated treatment: if they had an available compatible related donor they were assigned to allogeneic HSCT, or if not they were allocated to non-allogeneic HSCT therapy. Key inclusion criteria were participants aged 18-70 years, with advanced stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome, and at least one poor prognostic criteria. Participants were excluded if they were not in complete or partial remission of the disease. Propensity score 1:1 matching with replacement (ie, that each participant treated with HSCT was matched to the participant with the closest propensity score treated with non-HSCT therapy, even if they had already been matched) was used to handle confounding factors, with the balance of covariate distribution between HSCT and non-HSCT groups assessed using standardised mean differences. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the matched intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02520908), and is currently active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: From June 1, 2016, to March 3, 2022, total of 99 participants were enrolled at 17 centres in France. Participants with a sibling or matched unrelated donor were assigned to allogeneic HSCT (HSCT group, n=55 [56%]) and participants without a donor were assigned to non-allogeneic HSCT treatment (non-HSCT group, n=44 [44%]). The median follow-up among survivors was 12·6 months (IQR 11·0-35·2). In the HSCT group, 51 participants (93%) were 1:1 matched to participants from the non-HSCT group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the HSCT group (9·0 months [95% CI 6·6-30·5]) than in the non-HSCT group (3·0 months [2·0-6·3]), with a hazard ratio of 0·38 (95% CI 0·21-0·69; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol population, 40 participants (78%) in the HSCT group had 101 serious events and 29 participants (67%) in the non-HSCT group had 70 serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse event other than graft-versus-host disease in both groups was infections, occurring in 30 participants (59%) in the HSCT group and in 19 participants (44%) in the non-HSCT group. INTERPRETATION: Allogeneic HSCT was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival in participants with advanced-stage CTCLs. These results indicate that allogeneic HSCT treatment should be made available to individuals with high-risk, advanced-stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome who achieve pre-transplant disease remission. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health, National Cancer Institute, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique en Cancérologie.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous , Mycosis Fungoides , Sezary Syndrome , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Prospective Studies , Sezary Syndrome/therapy , Sezary Syndrome/etiology , Propensity Score , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/etiology , Transplantation, Homologous , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Mycosis Fungoides/etiology , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most effective treatment for selected patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and relies on a "graft-versus-leukemia" effect (GVL) where donor T lymphocytes mediate control of malignant cell growth. However, relapse remains the major cause of death after allo-HSCT. In various malignancies, several immunoregulatory mechanisms have been shown to restrain antitumor immunity, including ligand-mediated engagement of inhibitory receptors (IRs) on effector cells, and induction of immunosuppressive cell subsets, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Relapse after HSCT remains a major therapeutic challenge, but immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in restraining the GVL effect must be better deciphered in humans. We used mass cytometry to comprehensively characterize circulating leukocytes in 2 cohorts of patients after allo-HSCT. We first longitudinally assessed various immunoregulatory parameters highlighting specific trends, such as opposite dynamics between MDSCs and Tregs. More generally, the immune landscape was stable from months 3 to 6, whereas many variations occurred from months 6 to 12 after HSCT. Comparison with healthy individuals revealed that profound alterations in the immune equilibrium persisted 1 year after HSCT. Importantly, we found that high levels of TIGIT and CD161 expression on CD4 T cells at month 3 after HSCT were distinct features significantly associated with subsequent AML relapse in a second cross-sectional cohort. Altogether, these data provide global insights into the reconstitution of the immunoregulatory landscape after HSCT and highlight non-canonical IRs associated with relapse, which could open the path to new prognostic tools or therapeutic targets to restore subverted anti-AML immunity.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Ligands , Receptors, Immunologic , Recurrence , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
Administration of azithromycin after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies has been associated with relapse in a randomized phase 3 controlled clinical trial. Studying 240 samples from patients randomized in this trial is a unique opportunity to better understand the mechanisms underlying relapse, the first cause of mortality after transplantation. We used multi-omics on patients' samples to decipher immune alterations associated with azithromycin intake and post-transplantation relapsed malignancies. Azithromycin was associated with a network of altered energy metabolism pathways and immune subsets, including T cells biased toward immunomodulatory and exhausted profiles. In vitro, azithromycin exposure inhibited T-cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells and impaired T-cell metabolism through glycolysis inhibition, down-regulation of mitochondrial genes, and up-regulation of immunomodulatory genes, notably SOCS1. These results highlight that azithromycin directly affects immune cells that favor relapse, which raises caution about long-term use of azithromycin treatment in patients at high risk of malignancies. The ALLOZITHRO trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01959100.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms , Humans , Azithromycin/pharmacology , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Metabolic Networks and Pathways , Stem Cell TransplantationABSTRACT
In the 2022 European LeukemiaNet classification, patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were classified in the adverse-risk category in the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (CG). Nonetheless, the impact of various CG aberrations on posttransplant outcomes remains to be unraveled. This registry study analyzed adult patients with NPM1-mutated de novo AML who underwent their first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the first complete remission from 2005 to 2021. A total of 3275 patients were identified, 2782 had normal karyotype, 493 had chromosomal aberrations including 160 with adverse-risk CG, 72 patients had complex karyotype (CK), and 66 monosomal karyotype (MK). Overall, 2377 (73%) patients had FLT3-ITD. On univariate analysis, only FLT3-ITD, minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity and CK, but not abnormal CG, affected posttransplant outcomes. On multivariable analysis, CK was associated with lower overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72, p = .009). In the subgroup of 493 patients with aberrant CG, the 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and OS were around 61% and 68%, respectively. On multivariable analysis for this subgroup, CK and MRD positivity were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR 1.7, p = .025; and 1.99, p = .003 respectively) and worse LFS (HR 1.62, p = .018; and 1.64, p = .011 respectively) while FLT3-ITD, MK, or other CG abnormalities had no significant effect. Importantly, CK negatively affected OS (HR 1.91, p = .002). In the first complete remission transplant setting, CK was found as the only cytogenetic risk factor for worse outcomes in NPM1-mutated AML. Nevertheless, even for this subgroup, a significant proportion of patients can achieve long-term posttransplant survival.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Nucleophosmin , Bone Marrow , Mutation , Chromosome Aberrations , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Abnormal Karyotype , Karyotype , Neoplasm, Residual , Prognosis , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare two immunosuppressive strategies, based on the use of either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY), as a prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission who underwent hematopoietic cells transplantation from matched unrelated donors. METHODS: Overall, 117 and 779 adult patients who received PTCY and ATG, respectively, between the years 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The median patient age was 40 and 43 years in the PTCY and ATG groups, respectively, and 37% and 35% of patients, respectively, had Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the study groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was reduced in the PTCY group (18% vs. 25%; p = .046) without a significant impact on nonrelapse mortality (11% vs. 16% in the ATG group; p = .29). The rates of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival were 71% versus 59%, respectively (p = .01), and 82% versus 74%, respectively (p = .08). In multivariate analysis, the receipt of ATG compared with PTCY was associated with a reduced risk of extensive chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.98; p = .04) and an increased risk of low LFS (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.45; p = .045). CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of ATG compared with PTCY, despite the reduced risk of extensive chronic GVHD, is associated with inferior LFS in adults with ALL who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation from 10/10 human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors. These findings warrant verification in prospective trials.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Humans , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Unrelated Donors , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Bone Marrow , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Transplantation ConditioningABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2). Patients lacking a matched sibling donor (MSD) receive transplants from matched unrelated donors (MUDs), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical (haplo) donors, or cord blood. METHODS: This is a retrospective, registry-based European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study that investigates changes in patient- and transplant-related characteristics and posttransplant outcomes over time. RESULTS: We identified 3955 adult patients (46.7% female; median age, 52 years [range, 18-78 years]) with AML in CR2 first transplanted between 2005 and 2019 from a MUD 10/10 (61.4%), MMUD 9/10 (21.9%), or haplo donor (16.7%) and followed for 3.7 years. A total of 725 patients were transplanted between 2005 and 2009, 1600 between 2010 and 2014, and 1630 between 2015 and 2019. Over the three time periods, there was a significant increase in patient age (from 48.7 to 53.5 years; p < .001), use of a haplo donor (from 4.6% to 26.4%; p < .001), and use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (from 0.4% to 29%; p < .001). There was a significant decrease in total body irradiation and in vivo T-cell depletion. In multivariate analysis, transplants performed more recently had better outcomes. Leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; p = .002) and overall survival (HR, 0.73; p < .001) increased over time. Similarly, nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.64; p < .001) decreased over time. We also observed better graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) rates (acute GVHD II-IV: HR, 0.78; p = .03; GVHD-free, relapse-free survival: HR, 0.69; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the absence of an MSD, outcomes of allo-HCT in CR2 for AML have significantly improved over time, with most favorable outcomes achieved with a MUD.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Bone Marrow , Retrospective Studies , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Acute Disease , Cyclophosphamide , Unrelated Donors , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Transplantation ConditioningABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy. (Funded by Novartis; REACH2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02913261.).
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Nitriles , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Transplantation, Homologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
A multistage model instructed by a large dataset (knowledge bank [KB] algorithm) has recently been developed to improve outcome predictions and tailor therapeutic decisions, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We assessed the performance of the KB in guiding HSCT decisions in first complete remission (CR1) in 656 AML patients younger than 60 years from the ALFA-0702 trial (NCT00932412). KB predictions of overall survival (OS) were superior to those of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk stratification (C-index, 68.9 vs 63.0). Among patients reaching CR1, HSCT in CR1, as a time-dependent covariate, was detrimental in those with favorable ELN 2017 risk and those with negative NPM1 minimal residual disease (MRD; interaction tests, P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). Using KB simulations of survival at 5 years in a scenario without HSCT in CR1 (KB score), we identified, in a similar time-dependent analysis, a significant interaction between KB score and HSCT, with HSCT in CR1 being detrimental only in patients with a good prognosis based on KB simulations (KB score ≥40; interaction test, P = .01). We could finally integrate ELN 2017, NPM1 MRD, and KB scores to sort 545 CR1 patients into 278 (51.0%) HSCT candidates and 267 (49.0%) chemotherapy-only candidates. In both time-dependent and 6-month landmark analyses, HSCT significantly improved OS in HSCT candidates, whereas it significantly shortened OS in chemotherapy-only candidates. Integrating KB predictions with ELN 2017 and MRD may thus represent a promising approach to optimize HSCT timing in younger AML patients.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Precision Medicine , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Combined Modality Therapy , Datasets as Topic , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm, Residual , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nucleophosmin , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Remission Induction , Risk Assessment , Transplantation, Homologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
Debates on the role and timing of allogeneic hemtopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have persisted for decades. Time to transplant introduces an immortal time and current treatment algorithm mainly relies on the European LeukemiaNet disease risk classification. Previous studies are also limited to age groups, remission status and other ill-defined parameters. We studied all patients at diagnosis irrespective of age and comorbidities to estimate the cumulative incidence and potential benefit or disadvantage of HSCT in a single center. As a time-dependent covariate, HSCT improved overall survival in intermediate- and poor-risk patients (hazard ratio =0.51; P=0.004). In goodrisk patients only eight were transplanted in first complete remission. Overall, the 4-year cumulative incidence of HSCT was only 21.9% but was higher (52.1%) for patients in the first age quartile (16-57 years old) and 26.4% in older patients (57-70 years old) (P<0.001). It was negligible in patients older than 70 years reflecting our own transplant policy but also barriers to transplantation (comorbidities and remission status). However, HSCT patients need to survive, be considered eligible both by the referring and the HSCT physicians and have a suitable donor to get transplantation. We, thus, comprehensively analyzed the complete decision-making and outcome of all our AML patients from diagnosis to last followup to decipher how patient allocation and therapy inform the value of HSCT. The role of HSCT in AML is shifting with broad access to different donors including haploidentical ones. Thus, it may (or may not) lead to increased numbers of allogeneic HSCT in AML in adults.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Transplantation, Homologous , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Remission Induction , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for severe idiopathic aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved in recent years, approaching 75% at 5 years. However, an SAA-adapted composite endpoint, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS), may more accurately assess patient outcomes beyond survival. We analyzed GRFS to identify risk factors and specific causes of GRFS failure. Our retrospective analysis from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 479 patients with idiopathic SAA who underwent allo-HSCT in two conventional situations: i) upfront allo-HSCT from a matched related donor (MRD) (upfront cohort), and ii) allo-HSCT for relapsed or refractory SAA (rel/ref cohort). Relevant events for GRFS calculation included graft failure, grade 3-4 acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD, and death. In the upfront cohort (n=209), 5-year GRFS was 77%. Late allo-HSCT (i.e., >6 months after SAA diagnosis) was the main poor prognostic factor, specifically increasing the risk of death as the cause of GRFS failure (hazard ratio [HR]=4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-11.83; P=0.010). In the rel/ref cohort (n=270), 5-year GRFS was 61%. Age was the main factor significantly increasing the risk of death (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P<0.001), acute GvHD (HR=1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; P=0.041), and chronic GvHD (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08; P=0.032) as the cause of GRFS failure. GRFS after upfront MRD allo-HSCT was very good, notably with early allo-HSCT, confirming that younger patients with an MRD should be transplanted immediately. GRFS was worse in cases of salvage allo-HSCT, most notably in older patients, questioning the utility of allo-HSCT earlier in the disease course.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic , Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Aged , Anemia, Aplastic/complications , Retrospective Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. METHODS: The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010-2020. RESULTS: The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19-73) and 38 (18-75) years, respectively (p = .51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p < .0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109 /L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-2.62; p = .21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52-1.28, p = .38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73-1.50, p = .8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.76, p = .46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78-1.46, p = .7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2-4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08-2.76, p = .023), whereas aGVHD grade 3-4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Humans , Unrelated Donors , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , HLA Antigens , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A broad proteomic analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate candidate biomarkers potentially predictive of response to treatment with an oral selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, itacitinib, in acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Plasma samples from 25 participants (identification cohort; NCT02614612) were used to identify novel biomarkers that were tested in a validation cohort from a placebo-controlled, randomised trial (n = 210; NCT03139604). The identification cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 or 300 mg itacitinib once daily. The validation cohort received corticosteroids plus 200 mg itacitinib once daily or placebo. A broad proteomic analysis was conducted using a proximity extension assay. Baseline and longitudinal comparisons were performed with unpaired t-test and one-way analysis of variance used to evaluate biomarker level changes. Seven candidate biomarkers were identified. Monocyte-chemotactic protein (MCP)3, pro-calcitonin/calcitonin (ProCALCA/CALCA), together with a previously identified prognostic acute GVHD biomarker, regenerating islet-derived protein (REG)3A, stratified complete responders from non-responders (participants with progressive disease) to itacitinib, but not placebo, potentially representing predictive biomarkers of itacitinib in acute GVHD. ProCALCA/CALCA, suppressor of tumorigenicity (ST)2, and tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)1 were significantly reduced over time by itacitinib in responders, potentially representing response-to-treatment biomarkers. Novel biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with acute GVHD that may respond to itacitinib plus corticosteroid treatment (NCT02614612; NCT03139604).
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Acetonitriles , Acute Disease , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Proteomics , Pyrazoles , Pyrimidines , PyrrolesABSTRACT
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Only half of patients with severe acute GVHD respond to first-line treatment with corticosteroids and, for several decades, there was no optimal second-line treatment of patients with corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD. Ruxolitinib was recently approved for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Thus, it is important to define the patient population that would now be considered as refractory to ruxolitinib vs ruxolitinib dependent. Here, we propose to define ruxolitinib-refractory acute GVHD as disease that shows: (1) progression of GVHD compared with baseline after at least 5 to 10 days of treatment with ruxolitinib, based either on objective increase in stage/grade, or new organ involvement; (2) lack of improvement in GVHD (partial response or better) compared with baseline after ≥14 days of treatment with ruxolitinib; or (3) loss of response, defined as objective worsening of GVHD determined by increase in stage, grade, or new organ involvement at any time after initial improvement. GVHD manifestations that persist without improvement in patients who had a grade ≥3 treatment-emergent and ruxolitinib-attributed adverse event that did not resolve within 7 days of discontinuing ruxolitinib would serve as a clinical indication for additional treatment. In addition, absence of complete response or very good partial response at day 28 after ruxolitinib could be considered as an eligibility criterion.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Salvage Therapy , Therapies, Investigational , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disease Progression , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Nitriles , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines , Salvage Therapy/methods , Salvage Therapy/trends , Therapies, Investigational/methods , Therapies, Investigational/trends , Treatment Failure , Young AdultABSTRACT
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutational status is a pivotal prognosticator in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and significantly increases the risk of disease relapse. However, it remains unclear whether in FLT3-ITD patients referred for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), baseline cytogenetics significantly impacts clinical outcome. Using the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1631 FLT3-ITD AML patients who underwent allo-SCT with the aim of determining the influence of cytogenetic risk category on patient outcomes. Median patient age was 49 years and median follow-up duration was 36 months. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and incidence of relapse were 54% and 31.6%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was experienced by 14.4% with a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 60.1%. On multivariate analysis, LFS was significantly lower in patients with intermediate and adverse risk cytogenetics compared with those with favorable risk cytogenetics, (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.06; p = .02), and (HR = 01.65, 95% CI, 1.13-2.40; p = .009), respectively. OS was significantly lower in patients with adverse risk cytogenetics compared with patients with favorable risk cytogenetics (HR = 1.74, 95% CI, 1.16-2.61; p = .008) with a trend toward lower OS in patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics compared to those with favorable risk cytogenetics (HR = 1.43, 95% CI, 1.00-2.05; p = .052). In addition, adverse risk patients and intermediate risk patients experienced higher relapse rates compared with favorable risk patients (HR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.13-2.94; p = .013 and HR = 1.82, 95% CI, 1.19-2.77; p = .005). Overall, cytogenetic studies aid in refinement of risk stratification in transplanted FLT3-ITD AML patients.
Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Mutation , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival RateABSTRACT
The phase III study was designed to compare event-free survival (EFS) after treosulfan-based conditioning with a widely applied reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) busulfan regimen in older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A previously reported confirmatory interim analysis of the randomized clinical study including 476 patients demonstrated statistically significant noninferiority for treosulfan with clinically meaningful improvement in EFS. Here, the final study results and pre-specified subgroup analyses of all 570 randomized patients with completed longer-term follow-up are presented. Patients presenting HCT-specific comorbidity index >2 or aged ≥50 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) fludarabine with either treosulfan (30 g/m2 IV) or busulfan (6.4 mg/kg IV) after stratification by disease risk group, donor type, and participating institution. The primary endpoint was EFS with disease recurrence, graft failure, or death from any cause as events. EFS of patients (median age 60 years) was superior after treosulfan compared to RIC busulfan: 36-months-EFS rate 59.5% (95% CI, 52.2-66.1) vs. 49.7% (95% CI, 43.3-55.7) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.84), p = 0.0006. Likewise, overall survival (OS) with treosulfan was superior compared to busulfan: 36-month-OS rate 66.8% vs. 56.3%; HR 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.87), p = 0.0037. Post hoc analyses revealed that these differences were consistent with the confirmatory interim analysis, and thereby the treosulfan regimen appears particularly suitable for older AML and MDS patients.