Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of bladder cancer: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group.

PURPOSE: To identify laser settings and limits applied by experts during laser vaporization (vapBT) and laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications. METHODS: After a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, we conducted a survey (57 questions) which was sent to laser experts. The expert selection was based on clinical experience and scientific contribution. Participants were asked for used laser types, typical laser settings during specific scenarios, and preventive measures applied during surgery. Settings for a maximum of 2 different lasers for each scenario were possible. Responses and settings were compared among the reported laser types. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited experts completed the survey. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is the most common laser (57%), followed by Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (48%), continuous wave (cw) Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (26%), and pulsed Tm:YAG (13%). Experts prefer ERBT (91.3%) to vapBT (8.7%); however, relevant limitations such as tumor size, number, and anatomical tumor location exist. Laser settings were generally comparable; however, we could find significant differences between the laser sources for lateral wall ERBT (p = 0.028) and standard ERBT (p = 0.033), with cwTm:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG being operated in higher power modes when compared to TFL and Ho:YAG. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG and short pulse modes for TFL lasers. CONCLUSION: TFL seems to have replaced Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG. Most laser settings do not differ significantly among laser sources. For experts, continuous flow irrigation is the most commonly applied measure to reduce complications.

En bloc resection of bladder tumors: challenges and unmet needs in 2022.

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer accounts for the majority of new bladder cancer diagnoses, and endoscopic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) represents the standard-of-care. Although a relatively safe and common procedure, TURBT is often hampered by the questionable quality of resection. The evolution of surgical techniques has brought en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) to the forefront. ERBT has emerged as an alternative to conventional TURBT, incorporating a more delicate en bloc sculpting and tumor excision, in contrast to 'piecemeal' resection by conventional TURBT. ERBT appears safe, feasible and effective with demonstrably higher rates of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, all while providing better staging and obviating the need for a re-TURBT in selected patients. However, the method's adoption in the field is still limited. This review summarizes the recent evidence relevant to ERBT while further highlighting the technique's limitations and unmet needs.

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor remains the standard-of-care for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The procedure is the first-line diagnostic test and treatment for early-stage bladder cancer. However, the poor post-operative outcomes relevant to the surgical technique have led to constant questioning of its efficacy for years. A novel procedure, en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT), has come to the forefront. This represents an attractive method that can be accomplished by a breadth of energy delivery systems. Thus far, this technique appears feasible, safe and efficient, providing excellent and precise histological specimens. Despite the recent surge in studies reporting on ERBT, well-designed, properly conducted randomized controlled trials examining the technique's long-term efficacy are still lacking and excitedly anticipated in the years to come. The present article gives an overview of current knowledge surrounding the role of ERBT, outlines the existing challenges and unmet needs, and provides future perspectives on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Does Ureteral Stenting Increase the Risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Bladder Tumors? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stenting in patients with bladder cancer may become necessary in order to protect the ureteral orifice during transurethral resection of the tumor or for relief of upper urinary tract obstruction. However, it is believed to increase metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ureteral stenting versus nephrostomy or no drainage with regard to the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Records were identified through database searches and sources of grey literature up to October 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020178298). RESULTS: Five studies (3,309 individuals) were included. Overall, 278 ureteral stents were placed and 20 (7.2%) patients developed metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma, while 131 patients were treated with nephrostomy and 3 (2.3%) cases of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma occurred. Patients treated with ureteral stents had a higher likelihood of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared to no stents (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.43-8.48, I2=52%) and no upper urinary tract drainage (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.49-7.63, I2=45%). No difference with regard to metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma was observed between stent and nephrostomy (OR: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.41-22.98, I2=54%). For the same outcomes, no difference was noted for patients with hydronephrosis. The level of evidence for all measures was evaluated as low. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting as a preventive measure after resection of tumors involving the orifice should be avoided, when possible, as it increases the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In cases of hydronephrosis, drainage with either nephrostomy or stent is recommended depending on individual patient cases as both interventions do not differ regarding metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk.

Renal Transplantation Improves Erectile Function in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction has a lower prevalence in renal transplant recipients compared to dialysis patients. Despite this observation, the effect of renal transplantation on erectile function remains unknown. We aimed to assess the role of renal transplantation on erectile function and to determine potential factors improving or deteriorating erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of observational studies comparing erectile function preoperatively and postoperatively in renal transplant recipients (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020189580). Records reporting relevant outcomes were identified through search of PubMed®, Embase®, Cochrane Library and Scopus® databases from inception to September 2020. Judgment of the strength of evidence was performed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We included 20 studies with 1,695 renal transplant recipients. At postoperative evaluation the number of patients with erectile dysfunction was reduced (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.45, I2=88%). Renal transplant recipients reported an improvement in erectile function (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.44-4.44, I2=90%) and the mean International Index of Erectile Function score increased by 3.04 points (95% CI 0.63-5.45, I2=96%) after renal transplantation. These effects were not demonstrated in the sensitivity analysis. In individuals reporting severe erectile dysfunction, no favorable effect of renal transplantation was observed (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.85-2.68, I2=33%). For all outcomes the strength of evidence was considered low or very low due to methodological concerns and high heterogeneity among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation improves erectile function and the risk of erectile dysfunction reduces postoperatively compared to preoperatively. However, evidence on the matter is mostly based on low quality data. More studies with standardized outcomes are needed to validate and strengthen our findings.

Micro-Ultrasound-Guided vs Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Micro-ultrasound is a novel high resolution ultrasound technology aiming to improve prostate imaging and, consequently, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Micro-ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy may present comparable detection rates to the standard of care multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. We aimed to compare the detection rate of micro-ultrasound vs multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies comparing micro-ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy as a reference standard test (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020198326). Records were identified by searching in PubMed®, Scopus® and Cochrane Library databases, as well as in potential sources of gray literature until November 30th, 2020. RESULTS: We included 18 studies in the qualitative and 13 in the quantitative synthesis. In the quantitative synthesis, 1,125 participants received micro-ultrasound-guided followed by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy. Micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies displayed similar detection rates across all prostate cancer grades. The pooled detection ratio for International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥2 prostate cancer was 1.05 (95% CI 0.93-1.19, I2=0%), 1.25 (95% CI 0.95-1.64, I2=0%) for Grade Group ≥3 and 0.94 (95% CI 0.73-1.22, I2=0%) for clinically insignificant (Grade Group 1) prostate cancer. The overall detection ratio for prostate cancer was 0.99 (95% CI 0.89-1.11, I2=0%). CONCLUSIONS: Micro-ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy provides comparable detection rates for prostate cancer diagnosis with the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy. Therefore, it could be considered as an attractive alternative to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy. Nevertheless, high quality randomized trials are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy for the management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to improve the level of evidence and determine the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases from inception to November 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the role of LiST for the management of CP/CPPS. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs comparing LiST vs sham therapy on CP/CPPS symptoms at different time-points after treatment. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Furthermore, we assessed the strength of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]: CRD42020208813). RESULTS: We included five sham RCTs and one non-sham RCT. In the meta-analysis of sham RCTs, both the National Institute of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) pain domain score and the numeric pain rating scale improved significantly after LiST vs sham therapy at the assessment directly after treatment protocol completion (WMD 3.2, 95% CI 0.88-5.52, I2 = 90%; and WMD 1.43, 95% CI 0.85-2.01, I2 = 32%, respectively), at 1 month (WMD 4.4, 95% CI 2.84-5.95, I2 = 68%, and WMD 2.59, 95% CI 1.92-3.27, I2 = 83%, respectively), and at 3 months after last treatment session (WMD 3.61, 95% CI 1.49-5.74, I2 = 90%, and WMD 2.64, 95% CI 2.13-3.16, I2 = 71%, respectively). Similarly, the NIH-CPSI total and quality-of-life domain scores improved significantly after LiST compared to sham therapy for the same time-points. Conversely, the long-term efficacy of LiST, as well as the effect of LiST on lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function, was clinically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: LiST is an effective treatment modality for the improvement of pain and quality of life in patients with CP/CPPS. Therefore, it should be recommended as a part of individualised treatment strategies in such patients.

Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is an under-recognized clinical entity in men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and studies on renal transplant recipients, patients on dialysis, and patients starting dialysis report different prevalence rates and severity of ED among these groups. AIM: To determine the prevalence and severity of ED in patients with ESRD, assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function-15 and International Index of Erectile Function-5. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the prevalence of ED in ESRD individuals. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020182680). Records were identified by search in MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases and sources of gray literature until July 2020. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions (double arcsine transformation). OUTCOMES: We included 94 studies with 110 patient group entries and a total of 10,320 ESRD male individuals with a mean age of 48.8 ± 14.25 years. RESULTS: Overall, 7,253 patients experienced ED. We estimated an overall pooled ED prevalence of 71% (95% CI: 67-74%, I2 = 92%). In the subgroup analyses, the pooled prevalence was 59% (95% CI: 53-64%, I2 = 92%) among renal transplant recipients, 79% (95% CI: 75-82%, I2 = 86%) in patients on hemodialysis, 71% (95% CI: 58-83%, I2 = 86%) in patients on peritoneal dialysis, and 82% (95% CI: 75-88%, I2 = 0%) in patients with ESRD starting dialysis. The prevalence of the severity of ED was also estimated. Further assessment of heterogeneity was conducted via sensitivity analysis, cumulative meta-analysis, and meta-regression of significant risk factors. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: Despite its high prevalence in patients with ESRD, ED constitutes an underestimated and taboo subject in this group. Therefore, arousing clinical concern among healthcare providers involved in ESRD management is more than necessary to screen and treat ED in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: We estimated ED solely for ESRD, included the largest number of patients compared with previous studies and estimated ED prevalence as per severity and renal replacement therapy subgroups. Contrary, because we restricted our eligibility criteria to the International Index of Erectile Function, some studies assessing ED prevalence with other validated tools were not included in this meta-analysis. Moreover, the levels of heterogeneity among studies remained high after sensitivity and meta-regression analyses, and for some moderators, the results of the meta-regression might have been underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: ED is highly prevalent in patients with ESRD irrespective of the type of renal replacement therapy, thereby warranting clinical attention. Pyrgidis N, Mykoniatis I, Nigdelis MP, et al. Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2021;18:113-120.

Sexual Dysfunction in Women With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In women with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), female sexual dysfunction (SD) remains underestimated. AIM: To explore the prevalence, correlates, diagnostic approach and treatment modalities of sexual symptoms in females with ESRD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate both the prevalence of SD and the pooled Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores in ESRD females. Similarly, for studies reporting the FSFI score before and after renal transplantation (RT), we estimated the effect of RT on sexual function. Further assessment of heterogeneity was conducted via subgroup and sensitivity analyses, cumulative meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression of important correlates. Records were identified through searching PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases as well as sources of grey literature until November 2020 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020215178). OUTCOMES: We included 47 studies with 61 patient group entries and 3490 ESRD female individuals (median age: 45.2 years, ΙQR: 40.4-50.6). RESULTS: The SD prevalence in all females with ESRD was 74% (95%CI: 67%-80%, I2 = 92%) and the FSFI total score 16.1 points (95%CI: 14.3-17.8, I2 = 98%). The female SD prevalence was 63% (95%CI: 43%-81%, I2 = 92%) in renal transplant recipients, 80% (95%CI: 72%-87%, I2 = 91%) in hemodialysis patients and 67% (95%CI: 46%-84%, I2 = 90%) in peritoneal dialysis patients. The total FSFI score improved by 7.5 points (95%CI: 3.9-11.1, I2 = 92%) after RT. Older age and menopause were associated with higher SD prevalence. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: Female SD is highly prevalent in all ESRD women, but renal transplant recipients reported improved sexual function. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: We provide the first study about SD in females and assessed the role of RT on sexual function. Contrary, none of the included studies evaluated the concomitant presence of distress with SD. The levels of heterogeneity were substantially high for all outcomes and we could not adjust for further correlates, which might have affected our measures. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual symptoms negatively affect the quality of life and warrants appropriate clinical attention, as they are an underdetermined and undertreated clinical entity in females with ESRD. Studies on treatment modalities of female SD in patients with ESRD are mandatory, as currently no relevant studies or clinical recommendations exist. Pyrgidis N, Mykoniatis I, Tishukov M, et al. Sexual Dysfunction in Women With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Med Rev 2021;18:936-945.

Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate adherence to the EAU guidelines (GL) on penile cancer (PC) with regard to primary surgical treatment and management of lymph nodes and to estimate the influence of adherence to GL on clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 12 European and American centers between 2010 and 2016. Adherence to the EAU GL on the surgical management of the primary penile tumor and lymphadenectomy was evaluated. Descriptive analyses were performed, and survival curves were estimated. RESULTS: Data on 425 patients were considered for the analysis. The EAU GL on surgical treatment of the primary tumor and lymphadenectomy were respected in 74.8% and 73.7% of cases, respectively. Survival analysis showed that adherence to the GL on primary penile surgery was significantly associated with a good overall survival [adjusted HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.83, p value = 0.014)]. Also, the adherence to the GL on lymphadenectomy was statistically significantly associated with overall survival [adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.96, p value = 0.038)]. Limited follow-up and retrospective design represent limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there is a good adherence to the EAU GL on PC. However, this should be further reinforced, endorsed and encouraged as it might translate into better clinical outcomes for PC patients.

Patient's adherence on pharmacological therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is different: is combination therapy better than monotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that the non-adherence to the pharmacological therapy of patients affected by BPH-associated LUTS increased the risk of clinical progression of BPH. We examined the patients adherence to pharmacological therapy and its clinical consequences in men with BPH-associated LUTS looking at the differences between drug classes comparing mono vs combination therapy. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based cohort study, using prescription administrative database and hospital discharge codes from a total of 1.5 million Italian men. Patients ≥ 40 years, administered alpha-blockers (AB) and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), alone or in combination (CT), for BPH-associated LUTS were analyzed. The 1-year and long term adherence together with the analyses of hospitalization rates for BPH and BPH-related surgery were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model and Pearson chi square test. RESULTS: Patients exposed to at least 6 months of therapy had a 1-year overall adherence of 29 % (monotherapy AB 35 %, monotherapy 5ARI 18 %, CT 9 %). Patient adherence progressively declined to 15 %, 8 % and 3 % for AB, 5ARI, and CT, respectively at the fifth year of follow up. Patients on CT had a higher discontinuation rate along all the follow-up compared to those under monotherapy with ABs or 5ARIs (all p < 0.0001). Moreover, CT was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for BPH-related surgery (HR 0.94; p < 0.0001) compared to AB monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to pharmacological therapy of BPH-associated LUTS is low and varies depending on drugs class. Patients under CT have a higher likelihood of discontinuing treatment for a number of reasons that should be better investigated. Our study suggests that new strategies aiming to increase patient's adherence to the prescribed treatment are necessary in order to prevent BPH progression.

Do young patients with renal cell carcinoma feature a distinct outcome after surgery? A comparative analysis of patient age based on the multinational CORONA database.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the distinct clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma age 40 years or less compared to a reference group of patients 60 to 70 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall 2,572 patients retrieved from a multicenter international database comprised of 6,234 patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and histopathological features of 297 patients 40 years old or younger (4.8%) were compared to those of 2,275 patients (36.5%) 60 to 70 years old, who served as the reference group. Median followup was 59 months. The impact of young age and further parameters on disease specific mortality and all cause mortality was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Young patients more frequently underwent nephron sparing surgery (27% vs 20%, p = 0.008) and regional lymph node dissection compared to older patients (38% vs 32%, p = 0.025). Organ confined tumor stage (81% vs 70%, p <0.001), smaller tumor diameter (4.5 vs 4.7 cm, p = 0.014) and chromophobe subtype (10% vs 4%, p <0.001) were significantly more frequent in young patients. On multivariate analysis older patients had a higher disease specific (HR 2.21, p <0.001) and all cause mortality (HR 3.05, p <0.001). The c indices for the Cox models were 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. However, integration of the variable age group did not significantly increase the predictive accuracy of the disease specific and all cause mortality models. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with renal cell carcinoma (40 years old or younger) have significantly different frequencies of clinical and histopathological features, and a significantly lower all cause and disease specific mortality compared to patients 60 to 70 years old.

Editorial for Special Issue: "Current and Emerging Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia".

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) constitute a significant health concern worldwide, particularly among aging male populations [...].

The Discovery of an S-shaped Kidney in a Patient With Prostate Cancer: A Rare Finding.

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) constitutes a rare congenital anomaly of the urinary tract, typically characterized by its predominantly asymptomatic nature and frequent incidental discovery. This case report delineates the clinical profile of a 56-year-old male admitted to our Prostate Cancer Outpatient Clinic due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The patient was asymptomatic, with no family or surgical background. Notably, a fused ectopic kidney was incidentally identified during the staging process involving abdominal computed tomography (ACT) scanning. Remarkably, no additional abnormalities of the urinary tract or renal dysfunction manifested in this specific case. The significance of this report lies in the underscored emphasis on the importance of employing precise imaging techniques and tailored management strategies for patients harboring such anatomical variations.

Machine Learning and External Validation of the IDENTIFY Risk Calculator for Patients with Haematuria Referred to Secondary Care for Suspected Urinary Tract Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The IDENTIFY study developed a model to predict urinary tract cancer using patient characteristics from a large multicentre, international cohort of patients referred with haematuria. In addition to calculating an individual's cancer risk, it proposes thresholds to stratify them into very-low-risk (<1%), low-risk (1-<5%), intermediate-risk (5-<20%), and high-risk (≥20%) groups. OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the IDENTIFY haematuria risk calculator and compare traditional regression with machine learning algorithms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective data were collected on patients referred to secondary care with new haematuria. Data were collected for patient variables included in the IDENTIFY risk calculator, cancer outcome, and TNM staging. Machine learning methods were used to evaluate whether better models than those developed with traditional regression methods existed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the detection of urinary tract cancer, calibration coefficient, calibration in the large (CITL), and Brier score were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 3582 patients in the validation cohort. The development and validation cohorts were well matched. The AUC of the IDENTIFY risk calculator on the validation cohort was 0.78. This improved to 0.80 on a subanalysis of urothelial cancer prevalent countries alone, with a calibration slope of 1.04, CITL of 0.24, and Brier score of 0.14. The best machine learning model was Random Forest, which achieved an AUC of 0.76 on the validation cohort. There were no cancers stratified to the very-low-risk group in the validation cohort. Most cancers were stratified to the intermediate- and high-risk groups, with more aggressive cancers in higher-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IDENTIFY risk calculator performed well at predicting cancer in patients referred with haematuria on external validation. This tool can be used by urologists to better counsel patients on their cancer risks, to prioritise diagnostic resources on appropriate patients, and to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in those with a very low risk of cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: We previously developed a calculator that predicts patients' risk of cancer when they have blood in their urine, based on their personal characteristics. We have validated this risk calculator, by testing it on a separate group of patients to ensure that it works as expected. Most patients found to have cancer tended to be in the higher-risk groups and had more aggressive types of cancer with a higher risk. This tool can be used by clinicians to fast-track high-risk patients based on the calculator and investigate them more thoroughly.

Is a single-site laparoendoscopic approach a real surgical advancement for the management of small renal masses?

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) ensures equivalent oncological results while improving overall survival compared with radical nephrectomy when applied to the treatment of small renal masses, moreover warm ischemia is associated with a risk of acute renal failure and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) unclamp NSS is the next step forward in the management of small renal masses. From 2009 to 2013 we have treated 23 patients with small renal masses ( < 4 cm) amenable to the LESS approach using unclamp LESS NSS. In 20 cases we were able to complete the operation using LESS, in 3 cases conversion to standard laparoscopy was required. Pathologic examination revealed 16 cases of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 4 cases of renal cysts, 2 oncocytomas, and 1 angiomyolipoma. We did not find any significant variation in renal function or any case of tumor recurrence, and the majority of the patients were very satisfied of the cosmetic results. LESS unclamp partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure, oncological outcomes are similar to standard laparoscopy, there is an advantage with respect to renal function and cosmesis, although the procedure is more technically demanding compared with standard laparoscopy.

Conservative management of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Radical prostatectomy is currently the mainstay of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Although there is evidence that the evolution in surgical technique with the introduction of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has resulted in an improvement of functional outcomes, a significant percentage of patients are still bothered by post-prostatectomy incontinence. However, the majority of patients will find improvement in their continence status from conservative measures and a small cohort will require more invasive therapeutic options. Conservative treatment includes pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback techniques and pharmacotherapy. There is evidence that immediate initiation of physiotherapy after surgery will help in early restoration of continence, while additional benefit can be provided from pharmacotherapy mainly from duloxetine. The present review aims to provide an update on the epidemiology of post-prostatectomy incontinence, identify risk factors for incontinence after surgery and suggest current trends for conservative treatment.

Εmerging Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Testicular Tumors.

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are the leading cause of cancer-related death in young males between the ages of 20-40. Surgical resection and cisplatin-based chemotherapy can achieve a cure for the majority of patients with TGCTs, with survival rates of up to 97% for patients diagnosed at an early stage. The use of serum biomarkers, such as AFP ß-HCG, and LDH, plays a significant role in both diagnosis and evaluation of response to treatment, and despite their low sensitivity and specificity levels, they are an integral part of the current tumor staging system and daily practice. Molecular biomarkers, including micro-RNAs and gene-expression profiles, are currently being developed in TGCTs and could potentially hold a prominent place in the future diagnosis, treatment selection, surveillance, and prognostication of these tumors. This review discusses how current advances in our understanding of the underlying biology of TGCTs have helped biomarker discovery, with a focus on the recognition of key molecular alterations that could serve as potential indicators of disease onset, response to systemic or/and surgical therapies, and overall clinical course.

Enucleation of the prostate as retreatment for recurrent or residual benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is recommended for first line surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by moderate and large prostatic adenoma. However, its role in the retreatment setting after failed previous surgical treatment for BPO remains uncaptured. In this scope, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the safety and efficacy of AEEP in the retreatment setting. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases from inception to March 2022 for prospective or retrospective studies involving patients undergoing prostatic enucleation for recurrent or residual BPO after previous standard or minimally invasive surgical treatments for BPO. Based on data availability, we performed a meta-analysis comparing AEEP in patients with recurrent or residual BPO versus AEEP for primary BPO. PROSPERO: CRD42022308941). RESULTS: We included 15 studies in the systematic review and 10 in the meta-analysis (6553 patients, 841 with recurrent or residual BPO and 5712 with primary BPO). All included studies involved patients undergoing HoLEP or ThuLEP. In terms of Qmax, post-void residual, International Prostate Symptom Score, removed adenoma, operative time, duration of catheterization and hospital stay, as well as complications, HoLEP for recurrent or residual BPO was equally effective compared to HoLEP for primary BPO up to 1 year postoperatively. Importantly, the beneficial effect of HoLEP on the retreatment setting was observed after previous standard or minimally invasive surgical treatments for BPO. The overall strength of evidence for all outcomes was deemed very low. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP may be safely and effectively used in experienced hands for the surgical treatment of recurrent or residual BPO in patients with large or moderate prostates following previous open, endoscopic or minimally invasive surgical treatment for BPO.

En bloc resection, is this the future of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer management? Presentation of our technique and brief review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The quality of the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) plays a key role in accurate local staging thus affecting treatment decision-making and disease prognosis. TURBT is still the gold standard for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) gradually expanded as a promising alternative to TURBT, aiming to overcome certain inherent limitations of conventional resection. We hereby describe a step-by-step bipolar ERBT technique and briefly review the current trends surrounding the role of various en bloc techniques in the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 65-year old patient undergoing bipolar ERBT for a single, approximately 2 cm, papillary bladder mass. An experienced urologist completed the procedure within 17 min and without any intra- or postoperative complications. No conversion to TURBT was needed, and an adequate specimen for histological assessment was obtained. The patient made an uneventful recovery, and no recurrence was noted at 12-months. CONCLUSION: Our initial experience demonstrates that ERBT via bipolar current is relatively quick, safe, and reliable. Prospective comparative clinical trials will examine its efficacy, and long-term oncological superiority in managing NMIBC.