Gender differences in associations between trauma history and adjustment among chronic pain patients.

This study examines the relationship between a trauma history and emotional functioning in response to a chronic pain condition. We broadened the traditional study of trauma in chronic pain from sexual and physical abuse to include a variety of traumatic events and experiences that occurred not only during childhood, but during adulthood as well. Seventy-three (51% female, 60% lower back) chronic pain patients were administered the Trauma History Questionnaire (Green, B.L., Trauma History Questionnaire. In B.H. Stamm (Eds.), Measurement of Stress, Trauma and Adaptation, Sidran, Lutherville, MD, 1996, pp. 366-369), the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Kerns, R.D., Turk, D.C. and Rudy, T.E., The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI), Pain, 23 (1985) 345-356), The Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. and Erbaugh, J., An inventory for measuring depression, Arch. Gen Psychiatry, 4 (1961) 561-571), and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (McCracken, L.M., Zayfert, C., Gross, R.T. The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain, Pain, 50 (1992) 67-73) prior to starting a multidisciplinary pain program. We hypothesized that high levels of emotional distress and anxiety would differentiate patients with a substantial history of trauma from those without, while levels of pain severity and disability would not. A MANOVA revealed a significant Trauma Group (low vs. high) by Gender interaction for the dependent variables, which included both measures of emotional distress and pain severity and disability. Univariate tests showed that the interaction was significant only for emotional distress variables and not for pain severity and disability. Further, the multivariate effect of Trauma Group and the univariate effects for emotional distress variables were significant only among men. Results indicate that a substantial history of trauma may detrimentally impact a chronic pain patient's ability to manage their pain effectively, particularly among men.

Clerkship directors' perceptions of the effects of managed care on medical students' education.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the effect of managed care on medical students' education. Because clerkship directors (CDs) are especially well positioned to observe any changes, this study surveyed CDs from six medical specialties about their perceptions of the effects of managed care on medical students' education. METHOD: Anonymous questionnaires were mailed to 808 CDs from departments of six medical specialties at 125 U.S. allopathic medical schools between October 1997 and March 1998. Among other questions, respondents were asked whether they had observed changes in 19 different aspects of medical students' education, whether these changes were beneficial or detrimental, and whether they believed the changes were due to managed care and/or to other factors. Results were analyzed to determine perceptions of the overall magnitude and source(s) of changes, the perceived positive versus negative effect of managed care, and whether these outcomes were statistically associated with the perceived degree of managed care's market penetration. RESULTS: Five hundred questionnaires (61.9%) were returned. For full-time and voluntary faculty teaching, faculty availability for educational administration, directors' clinical responsibilities, and quality of professional life, the most common response was that managed care had an adverse effect. For faculty's enthusiasm for teaching, directors' administrative and educational duties, and clerkship training sites, the second most common response after "not changed" was that managed care had a negative effect. The majority of respondents held negative opinions of managed care and thought that medical students did not understand it. CONCLUSIONS: CDs in six medical specialties perceived that managed care has negatively affected medical students' education. These perceptions may influence medical students' education. Measures must be taken to ensure excellent education through adequate resources and training in the context of high-quality medical care.

Childhood emotional abuse and neglect as predictors of psychological and physical symptoms in women presenting to a primary care practice.

OBJECTIVE: There were two aims to this study: first to examine whether emotional abuse and neglect are significant predictors of psychological and somatic symptoms, and lifetime trauma exposure in women presenting to a primary care practice, and second to examine the strength of these relationships after controlling for the effects of other types of childhood abuse and trauma. METHOD: Two-hundred and five women completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein et al., 1994), Trauma History Questionnaire (Green, 1996), the Symptom Checklist-revised (Derogatis, 1997), and the Revised Civilian Mississippi Scale for posttraumatic stress disorder (Norris & Perilla, 1996) when presenting to their primary care physician for a visit. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine unique contributions of emotional abuse and neglect variables on symptom measures while controlling for childhood sexual and physical abuse and lifetime trauma exposure. RESULTS: A history of emotional abuse and neglect was associated with increased anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress and physical symptoms, as well as lifetime trauma exposure. Physical and sexual abuse and lifetime trauma were also significant predictors of physical and psychological symptoms. Hierarchical multiple regressions demonstrated that emotional abuse and neglect predicted symptomatology in these women even when controlling for other types of abuse and lifetime trauma exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Long-standing behavioral consequences may arise as a result of childhood emotional abuse and neglect, specifically, poorer emotional and physical functioning, and vulnerability to further trauma exposure.