Analysis of the MILES cohort reveals determinants of disease progression and treatment response in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

INTRODUCTION: The Multicenter International Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) Efficacy of Sirolimus (MILES) trial revealed that sirolimus stabilised lung function in patients with moderately severe LAM. The purpose of this study was to further examine the MILES cohort for the effects of racial, demographic, clinical and physiological patient characteristics on disease progression and treatment response in LAM. METHODS: MILES subjects were stratified on the basis of menopausal status (pre-menopausal/post-menopausal), race (Asian/Caucasian), bronchodilator responsiveness (present/absent), initial forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; 51-70% versus ≤50% predicted) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) association (yes/no). A linear mixed effects model was used to compare slope differences, and nonparametric tests were used to compare medians and proportions between treatment groups in each stratum. RESULTS: In the MILES placebo group, pre-menopausal patients declined 5-fold faster than post-menopausal patients (mean±se FEV1 slope -17±3 versus -3±3 mL·month-1; p=0.003). Upon treatment with sirolimus, both the pre-menopausal (-17±3 versus -1±2 mL·month-1; p<0.0001) and post-menopausal patients (-3±3 versus 6±3 mL·month-1; p=0.04) exhibited a beneficial response in mean±se FEV1 slope compared with the placebo group. Race, LAM subtype, bronchodilator responsiveness or baseline FEV1 did not impact the rate of disease progression in the placebo group or treatment response in the sirolimus group. Menopausal status and race had differential effects on the adverse event profile of sirolimus. Baseline serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-D >600 pg·mL-1 identified subgroups of patients who were more likely to decline on placebo and respond to treatment with sirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: In LAM patients, treatment with sirolimus is beneficial regardless of menopausal status, race, bronchodilator responsiveness, baseline FEV1 or TSC association. Serum VEGF-D and menopausal status can help inform therapeutic decisions.

Quantitative disease progression model of α-1 proteinase inhibitor therapy on computed tomography lung density in patients with α-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

AIMS: Early-onset emphysema attributed to α-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is frequently overlooked and undertreated. RAPID-RCT/RAPID-OLE, the largest clinical trials of purified human α-1 proteinase inhibitor (A1 -PI; 60 mg kg-1  week-1 ) therapy completed to date, demonstrated for the first time that A1 -PI is clinically effective in slowing lung tissue loss in AATD. A posthoc pharmacometric analysis was undertaken to further explore dose, exposure and response. METHODS: A disease progression model was constructed, utilizing observed A1 -PI exposure and lung density decline rates (measured by computed tomography) from RAPID-RCT/RAPID-OLE, to predict effects of population variability and higher doses on A1 -PI exposure and clinical response. Dose-exposure and exposure-response relationships were characterized using nonlinear and linear mixed effects models, respectively. The dose-exposure model predicts summary exposures and not individual concentration kinetics; covariates included baseline serum A1 -PI, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and body weight. The exposure-response model relates A1 -PI exposure to lung density decline rate at varying exposure levels. RESULTS: A dose of 60 mg kg-1  week-1 achieved trough serum levels >11 µmol l-1 (putative 'protective threshold') in ≥98% patients. Dose-exposure-response simulations revealed increasing separation between A1 -PI and placebo in the proportions of patients achieving higher reductions in lung density decline rate; improvements in decline rates ≥0.5 g l-1  year-1 occurred more often in patients receiving A1 -PI: 63 vs. 12%. CONCLUSION: Weight-based A1 -PI dosing reliably raises serum levels above the 11 µmol l-1 threshold. However, our exposure-response simulations question whether this is the maximal, clinically effective threshold for A1 -PI therapy in AATD. The model suggested higher doses of A1 -PI would yield greater clinical effects.

Bioequivalence of a Liquid Formulation of Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor Compared with Prolastin®-C (Lyophilized Alpha1-PI) in Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency.

This study evaluated the bioequivalence, safety, and immunogenicity of a new liquid formulation of human plasma-derived alpha1-proteinase inhibitor, Liquid Alpha1-PI, compared with the Lyophilized Alpha1-PI formulation (Prolastin®-C), for augmentation therapy in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). In this double-blind, randomized, 20-week crossover study, 32 subjects with AATD were randomized to receive 8 weekly infusions of 60 mg/kg of Liquid Alpha1-PI or Lyophilized Alpha1-PI. Serial blood samples were drawn for 7 days after the last dose followed by 8 weeks of the alternative treatment. The primary endpoint was bioequivalence at steady state, as measured by area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 to 7 days (AUC0-7 days) postdose using an antigenic content assay. Bioequivalence was defined as 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares (LS) mean of AUC0-7 days for both products within the limits of 0.80 and 1.25. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. Mean alpha1-PI concentration versus time curves for both formulations were superimposable. Mean AUC0-7 days was 20 320 versus 19 838 mg × h/dl for Liquid Alpha1-PI and Lyophilized Alpha1-PI, respectively. The LS mean ratio of AUC0-7 days (90% CI) for Liquid Alpha1-PI versus Lyophilized Alpha1-PI was 1.05 (1.03-1.08), indicating bioequivalence. Liquid Alpha1-PI was well tolerated and adverse events were consistent with Lyophilized Alpha1-PI. Immunogenicity to either product was not detected. In conclusion, Liquid Alpha1-PI is bioequivalent to Lyophilized Alpha1-PI, with a similar safety profile. The liquid formulation would eliminate the need for reconstitution and shorten preparation time for patients receiving augmentation therapy for AATD.

Intravenous augmentation treatment and lung density in severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency (RAPID): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of α1 proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation treatment for α1 antitrypsin deficiency has not been substantiated by a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. CT-measured lung density is a more sensitive measure of disease progression in α1 antitrypsin deficiency emphysema than spirometry is, so we aimed to assess the efficacy of augmentation treatment with this measure. METHODS: The RAPID study was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of A1PI treatment in patients with α1 antitrypsin deficiency. We recruited eligible non-smokers (aged 18-65 years) in 28 international study centres in 13 countries if they had severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency (serum concentration <11 µM) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 35-70% (predicted). We excluded patients if they had undergone, or were on the waiting list to undergo, lung transplantation, lobectomy, or lung volume-reduction surgery, or had selective IgA deficiency. We randomly assigned patients (1:1; done by Accovion) using a computerised pseudorandom number generator (block size of four) with centre stratification to receive A1PI intravenously 60 mg/kg per week or placebo for 24 months. All patients and study investigators (including those assessing outcomes) were unaware of treatment allocation throughout the study. Primary endpoints were CT lung density at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) combined, and the two separately, at 0, 3, 12, 21, and 24 months, analysed by modified intention to treat (patients needed at least one evaluable lung density measurement). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00261833. A 2-year open-label extension study was also completed (NCT00670007). FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2006, and Nov 3, 2010, we randomly allocated 93 (52%) patients A1PI and 87 (48%) placebo, analysing 92 in the A1PI group and 85 in the placebo group. The annual rate of lung density loss at TLC and FRC combined did not differ between groups (A1PI -1·50 g/L per year [SE 0·22]; placebo -2·12 g/L per year [0·24]; difference 0·62 g/L per year [95% CI -0·02 to 1·26], p=0·06). However, the annual rate of lung density loss at TLC alone was significantly less in patients in the A1PI group (-1·45 g/L per year [SE 0·23]) than in the placebo group (-2·19 g/L per year [0·25]; difference 0·74 g/L per year [95% CI 0·06-1·42], p=0·03), but was not at FRC alone (A1PI -1·54 g/L per year [0·24]; placebo -2·02 g/L per year [0·26]; difference 0·48 g/L per year [-0·22 to 1·18], p=0·18). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups, with 1298 occurring in 92 (99%) patients in the A1PI group and 1068 occuring in 86 (99%) in the placebo group. 71 severe treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25 (27%) patients in the A1PI group and 58 occurred in 27 (31%) in the placebo group. One treatment-emergent adverse event leading to withdrawal from the study occurred in one patient (1%) in the A1PI group and ten occurred in four (5%) in the placebo group. One death occurred in the A1PI group (respiratory failure) and three occurred in the placebo group (sepsis, pneumonia, and metastatic breast cancer). INTERPRETATION: Measurement of lung density with CT at TLC alone provides evidence that purified A1PI augmentation slows progression of emphysema, a finding that could not be substantiated by lung density measurement at FRC alone or by the two measurements combined. These findings should prompt consideration of augmentation treatment to preserve lung parenchyma in individuals with emphysema secondary to severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency. FUNDING: CSL Behring.

Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a progressive, cystic lung disease in women; it is associated with inappropriate activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, which regulates cellular growth and lymphangiogenesis. Sirolimus (also called rapamycin) inhibits mTOR and has shown promise in phase 1-2 trials involving patients with LAM. METHODS: We conducted a two-stage trial of sirolimus involving 89 patients with LAM who had moderate lung impairment--a 12-month randomized, double-blind comparison of sirolimus with placebo, followed by a 12-month observation period. The primary end point was the difference between the groups in the rate of change (slope) in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). RESULTS: During the treatment period, the FEV(1) slope was -12±2 ml per month in the placebo group (43 patients) and 1±2 ml per month in the sirolimus group (46 patients) (P<0.001). The absolute between-group difference in the mean change in FEV(1) during the treatment period was 153 ml, or approximately 11% of the mean FEV(1) at enrollment. As compared with the placebo group, the sirolimus group had improvement from baseline to 12 months in measures of forced vital capacity, functional residual capacity, serum vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D), and quality of life and functional performance. There was no significant between-group difference in this interval in the change in 6-minute walk distance or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. After discontinuation of sirolimus, the decline in lung function resumed in the sirolimus group and paralleled that in the placebo group. Adverse events were more common with sirolimus, but the frequency of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAM, sirolimus stabilized lung function, reduced serum VEGF-D levels, and was associated with a reduction in symptoms and improvement in quality of life. Therapy with sirolimus may be useful in selected patients with LAM. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; MILES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00414648.).

Biochemical efficacy and safety of a new, ready-to-use, liquid alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor, GLASSIA (alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (human), intravenous).

Maintaining serum levels of alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) >11 µM by augmentation with plasma-derived human A1PI is currently the only specific therapy available to treat patients with the genetic deficiency of A1PI. In this study, a new, high-purity (≥90% A1PI in monomeric form), ready-to-use, liquid formulation of A1PI-GLASSIA (Kamada, Ness Ziona, Israel) was compared to PROLASTINÆ (Talecris, Research Triangle Park, NC, now Grifols), both commercially available, FDA-approved products. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with partial cross-over was designed to test the non-inferiority and safety of GLASSIA compared to PROLASTIN, assessing both antigenic and functional A1PI trough levels in subject serum. Non-inferiority of GLASSIA to PROLASTIN was demonstrated by remaining within the lower bounds of the confidence intervals (≤3 µM) for both antigenic and functional A1PI. The study concluded that GLASSIA, a new liquid, ready to use, formulation of A1PI, was not inferior to PROLASTIN and it was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to PROLASTIN.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of 120 mg/kg versus 60 mg/kg weekly intravenous infusions of alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study (SPARK).

Augmentation therapy with the approved dose of 60 mg/kg weekly intravenous (IV) alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor (alpha1-PI), achieves a trough serum level of 11 µM in individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), yet this is still below the level observed in healthy individuals. This study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of weekly infusions of a 120 mg/kg dose of alpha1-PI in 30 adults with AATD. Subjects with symptomatic, genetically determined (genotypes PI*ZZ, PI*Z(null), PI*(null)(null) or PI*(Z)Mmalton) AATD were randomly assigned to weekly infusions of 60 or 120 mg/kg alpha1-PI (Prolastin-C®) for 8 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) (including exacerbations), vital signs, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory assessments were recorded. Pharmacokinetic measurements included AUC0-7days, Cmax, trough, tmax, and t1/2, based on serum alpha1-PI concentrations. In total for both treatments, 112 AEs were reported, with exacerbation of COPD being the most frequent, consistent with the subjects' diagnoses. Mean steady-state serum alpha1-PI concentrations following 120 mg/kg weekly IV alpha1-PI were higher than with the 60 mg/kg dose and mean trough concentrations were 27.7 versus 17.3 µM, respectively. Dose proportionality was demonstrated for AUC0-7days and Cmax, with low inter-subject variability. The 120 mg/kg alpha1-PI weekly dose was considered to be safe and well tolerated, and provided more favorable physiologic alpha1-PI serum levels than the currently recommended 60 mg/kg dose. The effect of this dosing regimen on slowing and/or preventing emphysema progression in subjects with AATD warrants further investigation.

Association of IREB2 and CHRNA3 polymorphisms with airflow obstruction in severe alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

BACKGROUND: The development of COPD in subjects with alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is likely to be influenced by modifier genes. Genome-wide association studies and integrative genomics approaches in COPD have demonstrated significant associations with SNPs in the chromosome 15q region that includes CHRNA3 (cholinergic nicotine receptor alpha3) and IREB2 (iron regulatory binding protein 2).We investigated whether SNPs in the chromosome 15q region would be modifiers for lung function and COPD in AAT deficiency. METHODS: The current analysis included 378 PIZZ subjects in the AAT Genetic Modifiers Study and a replication cohort of 458 subjects from the UK AAT Deficiency National Registry. Nine SNPs in LOC123688, CHRNA3 and IREB2 were selected for genotyping. FEV1 percent of predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio were analyzed as quantitative phenotypes. Family-based association analysis was performed in the AAT Genetic Modifiers Study. In the replication set, general linear models were used for quantitative phenotypes and logistic regression models were used for the presence/absence of emphysema or COPD. RESULTS: Three SNPs (rs2568494 in IREB2, rs8034191 in LOC123688, and rs1051730 in CHRNA3) were associated with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 percent of predicted in the AAT Genetic Modifiers Study. Two SNPs (rs2568494 and rs1051730) were associated with the post-bronchodilator FEV1 percent of predicted and pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio; SNP-by-gender interactions were observed. In the UK National Registry dataset, rs2568494 was significantly associated with emphysema in the male subgroup; significant SNP-by-smoking interactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IREB2 and CHRNA3 are potential genetic modifiers of COPD phenotypes in individuals with severe AAT deficiency and may be sex-specific in their impact.

The prevalence of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency among patients found to have airflow obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disease that may be manifested by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Despite professional society guidelines that recommend broad testing of at-risk individuals, fewer than 10% of affected individuals have been identified. The goals of this study were to estimate the frequency of abnormal AAT genotypes among patients found to have fixed airflow obstruction and to assess the feasibility of having Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel administer the study. METHODS: Nineteen medical centers in the United States participated in the study. Eligible patients (> GOLD II, FEV(1)/FVC ratio < 0.7, with post-bronchodilator FEV(1)<80% predicted) were offered testing for AATD by the Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel at the time of pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: A total of 3,457 patients were tested, of whom 3152 were eligible. Deficient patients (ZZ, SZ) constituted 0.63% of subjects, while 10.88% were carriers (MS, MZ). Neither demographic (except African-American race) nor post-bronchodilator pulmonary function variables (FEV(1), FVC, FEV(1)/FVC ratio, TLC, and FEV(1)/FVC) allowed us to predict AAT heterozygote or deficiency status. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AATD among patients undergoing pulmonary function tests with fixed airflow obstruction was 0.63%. Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel effectively conducted the study.

A 28-day clinical trial of aerosolized hyaluronan in alpha-1 antiprotease deficiency COPD using desmosine as a surrogate marker for drug efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: A previous 2-week clinical trial of aerosolized hyaluronan (HA) in COPD showed a rapid reduction in lung elastic fiber breakdown, as measured by sputum levels of the unique elastin crosslinks, desmosine and isodesmosine (DID). To further assess the therapeutic efficacy of HA and the utility of DID as surrogate markers for the development of pulmonary emphysema, we have conducted a 28-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of HA involving 27 subjects with alpha-1 antiprotease deficiency COPD. METHODS: The study drug consisted of a 3 ml inhalation solution containing 0.03% HA with an average molecular weight of 150 kDa that was self-administered twice daily. DID levels were measured in urine, sputum, and plasma using tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Free urine DID in the HA group showed a significant negative correlation with time between days 14 and 35 (r = -1.0, p = 0.023) and was statistically significantly decreased from baseline at day 35 (15.4 vs 14.2 ng/mg creatinine, p = 0.035). A marked decrease in sputum DID was also seen in the HA group between days 1 and 28 (0.96 vs 0.18 ng/mg protein), but the difference was not significant, possibly due to the small number of adequate specimens. Plasma DID remained unchanged following HA treatment and no significant reductions in urine, sputum, or plasma DID were seen in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: The results support additional clinical trials to further evaluate the therapeutic effect of HA and the use of DID as a real-time marker of drug efficacy.

Pharmacokinetic comparability of Prolastin®-C to Prolastin® in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is characterized by low blood levels of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha1-PI) and may lead to emphysema. Alpha1-PI protects pulmonary tissue from damage caused by the action of proteolytic enzymes. Augmentation therapy with Prolastin® (Alpha1-Proteinase Inhibitor [Human]) to increase the levels of alpha1-PI has been used to treat individuals with AAT deficiency for over 20 years. Modifications to the Prolastin manufacturing process, incorporating additional purification and pathogen-reduction steps, have led to the development of an alpha1-PI product, designated Prolastin®-C (Alpha1-Proteinase inhibitor [Human]). The pharmacokinetic comparability of Prolastin-C to Prolastin was assessed in subjects with AAT deficiency. METHODS: In total, 24 subjects were randomized to receive 60 mg/kg of functionally active Prolastin-C or Prolastin by weekly intravenous infusion for 8 weeks before crossover to the alternate treatment for another 8 weeks. Pharmacokinetic plasma samples were drawn over 7 days following last dose in the first treatment period and over 10 days following the last dose in the second period. The primary end point for pharmacokinetic comparability was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over 7 days post dose (AUC0₋7 (days)) of alpha1-PI determined by potency (functional activity) assay. The crossover phase was followed by an 8-week open-label treatment phase with Prolastin-C only. RESULTS: Mean AUC0₋7 (days) was 155.9 versus 152.4 mg*h/mL for Prolastin-C and Prolastin, respectively. The geometric least squares mean ratio of AUC0₋7 (days) for Prolastin-C versus Prolastin had a point estimate of 1.03 and a 90% confidence interval of 0.97-1.09, demonstrating pharmacokinetic equivalence between the 2 products. Adverse events were similar for both treatments and occurred at a rate of 0.117 and 0.078 per infusion for Prolastin-C (double-blind treatment phase only) and Prolastin, respectively (p = 0.744). There were no treatment-emergent viral infections in any subject for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or C, or parvovirus B19 during the course of the study. CONCLUSION: Prolastin-C demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence and a comparable safety profile to Prolastin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00295061.

IL10 polymorphisms are associated with airflow obstruction in severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency.

Severe alpha(1)-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is a proven genetic risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), especially in individuals who smoke. There is marked variability in the development of lung disease in individuals homozygous (PI ZZ) for this autosomal recessive condition, suggesting that modifier genes could be important. We hypothesized that genetic determinants of obstructive lung disease may be modifiers of airflow obstruction in individuals with severe AAT deficiency. To identify modifier genes, we performed family-based association analyses for 10 genes previously associated with asthma and/or COPD, including IL10, TNF, GSTP1, NOS1, NOS3, SERPINA3, SERPINE2, SFTPB, TGFB1, and EPHX1. All analyses were performed in a cohort of 378 PI ZZ individuals from 167 families. Quantitative spirometric phenotypes included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and the ratio of FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC). A qualitative phenotype of moderate-to-severe COPD was defined for individuals with FEV(1)

alpha1-Antitrypsin augmentation therapy for PI*MZ heterozygotes: a cautionary note.

The use of IV augmentation therapy with plasma-derived alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of pulmonary disease associated with the severe genetic deficiency of AAT. The Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee of the Alpha-1 Foundation has become aware that physicians are prescribing this expensive blood product for the treatment of individuals with a single abnormal AAT gene, primarily the PI*MZ genotype. We are aware of no evidence that such therapy is effective in this patient population. The most important therapeutic interventions in such patients remain smoking cessation and elimination of other risk factors for lung disease. This commentary discusses the treatment of AAT deficiency and the concerns regarding treatment of PI*MZ individuals. We conclude that clinicians should avoid prescribing augmentation therapy for this heterozygote population.

Primary care diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: issues and opportunities.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency--an autosomal codominant condition that predisposes to emphysema and also to liver disease--affects 100,000 Americans, yet in many cases the condition is either not diagnosed or the time between first symptoms and diagnosis is long. Because primary care physicians care for large numbers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, enhanced suspicion of and testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in the primary care setting would help identify people affected with this condition. The authors discuss impediments to diagnosis and drivers to making the diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and they suggest several measures to enhance clinicians' recognition of the condition.

The Diagnosis and Management of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in the Adult.

Background: The diagnosis and clinical management of adults with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) have been the subject of ongoing debate, ever since the publication of the first American Thoracic Society guideline statement in 1989.1 In 2003, the "American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency" made a series of evidence-based recommendations, including a strong recommendation for broad-based diagnostic testing of all symptomatic adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).2 Even so, AATD remains widely under-recognized. To update the 2003 systematic review and clinical guidance, the Alpha-1 Foundation sponsored a committee of experts to examine all relevant, recent literature in order to provide concise recommendations for the diagnosis and management of individuals with AATD. Purpose: To provide recommendations for: (1) the performance and interpretation of diagnostic testing for AATD, and (2) the current management of adults with AATD and its associated medical conditions. Methods: A systematic review addressing the most pressing questions asked by clinicians (clinician-centric) was performed to identify citations related to AATD that were published since the 2003 comprehensive review, specifically evaluating publications between January 2002 and December 2014. Important, more recent publications were solicited from the writing committee members as well. The combined comprehensive literature reviews of the 2003 document and this current review comprise the evidence upon which the committee's conclusions and recommendations are based. Results: Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AATD were formulated by the committee. Conclusions: The major recommendations continue to endorse and reinforce the importance of testing for AATD in all adults with symptomatic fixed airflow obstruction, whether clinically labeled as COPD or asthma. Individuals with unexplained bronchiectasis or liver disease also should be tested. Family testing of first-degree relatives is currently the most efficient detection technique. In general, individuals with AATD and emphysema, bronchiectasis, and/or liver disease should be managed according to usual guidelines for these clinical conditions. In countries where intravenous augmentation therapy with purified pooled human plasma-derived alpha-1 antitrypsin is available, recent evidence now provides strong support for its use in appropriate individuals with lung disease due to AATD.

Peak physiologic responses to arm and leg ergometry in male and female patients with airflow obstruction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in work capacity for the arms and legs in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional investigation. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-four patients (90 men and 34 women) aged 45 to 81 years with moderate-to-very severe COPD. FEV(1) ranged from 0.70 to 2.79 L/min (FVC, 1.73 to 5.77 L; FEV(1)/FVC, 24 to 69%). All patients were in stable condition at the time of testing and receiving a stable drug regime. MEASUREMENTS: Each patient completed a demographic and medical history questionnaire, pulmonary function studies (spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity), peak exercise ergometry with gas exchange for the arms and legs; they also rated their subjective assessment of perceived dyspnea and extremity fatigue using Borg scores during exercise. RESULTS: Patients were of comparable age, with men taller and heavier than women. Smoking history was significantly less for women (47.9 pack-years vs 66.6 pack-years for men) even though each group presented with equivalent age (p > 0.05). Women were less obstructed than men, with FEV(1)/FVC (mean +/- SD) of 46.5 +/- 10.9% vs 40.2 +/- 9.3%, respectively. Ventilatory limitation during exercise was noted for all patients studied. Peak work capacity was greater for men, and leg peak responses were greater than arm values for each gender. As airway obstruction increased, work capacity became more limited. Peak arm work achieved was 38.9 +/- 19.6 W, oxygen uptake (VO(2)) was 903.9 +/- 263.5 mL/min, and minute ventilation (VE) was 33.7 +/- 9.5 L. Peak leg work value was 62.9 +/- 24.8 W, VO(2) was 1,091.4 +/- 321.5 mL/min, and VE was 39.3 +/- 12.0 L. Hence, arm values were 62%, 83%, and 85% of the measured leg values, respectively. Dyspnea and extremity effort scores were similar for men and women, and for arms and legs. Regression analysis was used to derive prediction equations for arm work from measured leg ergometry testing. For watts of work, a three-variable model emerged explaining 66% of the variance; VO(2) yielded a four-variable model with 80% of the variance explained; and VE yielded a three-variable model explaining 72% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Arm work is reduced by 38% that of the legs, while more modest reductions are noted for VO(2) and VE, suggesting greater mechanical efficiency for leg work as compared to arm work. These data also suggest greater metabolic demand for respiratory muscles and arm ergometry. Dyspnea and extremity Borg scores were equivalent for each modality and level of airway obstruction studied, suggesting that perception plays an important role in limiting exercise, and that a threshold for termination of exercise may exist. Further, peak leg ergometry results can be used with pulmonary function indexes to predict peak arm workload in watts, VO(2), and VE. These data may be used to assist the clinician in prescribing rehabilitation or estimating arm exercise ability when arm testing is unavailable.

6-minute walk work for assessment of functional capacity in patients with COPD.

UNLABELLED: The 6-min walk (6MW) test is commonly used to assess exercise capacity in patients with COPD and to track functional change resulting from disease progression or therapeutic intervention. Not surprisingly, distance covered has been the preferred outcome for this test. However, distance walked does not account for differences in body weight that are known to influence exercise capacity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6-min distance x body weight product (6MWORK) as an improved outcome measure with a solid physiologic foundation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-four men and women with moderate-to-severe COPD volunteered and completed the testing sequence, which included pulmonary function, a peak effort ramp cardiopulmonary exercise study with gas exchange, and the 6MW. Means and SD were generated for the variables of interest. Differences were analyzed using analysis of variance techniques. Correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and 6MWORK with indexes of pulmonary function, work performance, and Borg scores for dyspnea and effort. RESULTS: Men and women presented with a significant smoking history that also differed by gender (48 vs 66 pack-years, respectively; p < 0.01). The mean (+/- SD) FEV(1) values were 45 +/- 12.6% and 48 +/- 12.1%, respectively (not significant), while the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 14.7 +/- 6.1 vs 10.3 +/- 3.9 mL/min/mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.001), for men and women. The 6MWD averaged 416.8 +/- 79.0 m for men and 367.8 +/- 78.6 m for women, and these differences were significant (p < 0.002). When 6MWD was compared as the percent predicted of normal values, each gender presented with a similar reduction of 78.6 +/- 14.5% vs 79.9 +/- 17.5% (p > 0.05), respectively. 6MWORK averaged 35,370 +/- 9,482 kg/m and 25,643 +/- 9,080 kg/m (p < 0.0001) for men and women, respectively. 6MWORK yielded higher correlation coefficients than did 6MWD when correlated with DLCO, lung diffusion for alveolar ventilation, FEV(1), FEV(1)/FVC ratio, watts, peak oxygen uptake, peak minute ventilation, and peak tidal volume. The ROC curve demonstrated that 6MWORK had a significantly larger calculated area under the curve (p < 0.05) [plot of 100-sensitivity to specificity for each variable of interest for all subjects] than 6MWD when differentiating an objectively selected definition of low work capacity vs high work capacity (bike ergometry work, < 55 vs > 55 W, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that work calculated as the product of distance x body weight is an improved outcome measure for the 6MW. 6MWORK can be used whenever the 6MW is required to estimate a patient's functional capacity. This measure is also a common measure, which can be converted to indexes of caloric expenditure for direct cross-modality comparisons.

Biochemical efficacy and safety of a new pooled human plasma alpha(1)-antitrypsin, Respitin.

BACKGROUND: Augmentation therapy with pooled human plasma-derived alpha(1)-antitrypsin (AAT) has been shown to have biochemical efficacy in restoring serum AAT levels above the protective threshold. Also, clinical efficacy has been suggested. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of a new solvent detergent-treated preparation of pooled human plasma-derived AAT (proposed name Respitin; Alpha Therapeutic Corporation; Los Angeles, CA) to the commercially available preparation (Prolastin; Bayer Corporation; West Haven, CT), we conducted a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eligible subjects were adults (> 18 years of age) who had never smoked or were ex-smokers, had severe deficiency of AAT, and had fixed airflow obstruction (ie, postbroncholdilator FEV(1) of 30 to 80% of predicted values and/or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO] of < 70% of predicted values with evidence of emphysema on a CT scan). Of the 28 subjects recruited, 26 completed the 12-week comparison. Participants were randomized to receive Respitin (60 mg/kg once weekly; 14 subjects) or Prolastin (60 mg/kg once weekly; 14 subjects), and recipients of Prolastin then crossed over to receive Respitin thereafter for the 24-week duration of the study. RESULTS: The primary efficacy criteria were satisfied for equivalence to comparator (ie, the ratio of mean trough serum levels for Respitin/Prolastin at weeks 8 to 11 exceeded the efficacy criterion [0.905; p = 0.0206] as did the slope of the mean trough level over weeks 11 to 23 [-0.003 micromol per week]). In Respitin recipients, the trough serum antineutrophil elastase capacity at week 7 and at weeks 8 to 11 was also equivalent to the comparator, as was the rise in AAT levels in epithelial lining fluid from baseline to week 7. The levels of urinary elastin degradation products showed little appreciable change for > 24 weeks, and no difference between compared groups was shown through week 12. Adverse events were similarly infrequent in compared groups. Finally, neither spirometry measurements nor DLCO showed a significant change through 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this new solvent detergent-treated pooled human plasma-derived AAT (Respitin) demonstrates biochemical equivalence to Prolastin and that this new drug is well-tolerated.

Serum VEGF-D a concentration as a biomarker of lymphangioleiomyomatosis severity and treatment response: a prospective analysis of the Multicenter International Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Efficacy of Sirolimus (MILES) trial.

BACKGROUND: VEGF-D is a lymphangiogenic growth factor that has a key role in tumour metastasis. Serum VEGF-D concentrations are increased in most patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis, a rare neoplasm associated with mTOR-activating tuberous sclerosis gene mutations, lymphadenopathy, metastatic spread, and pulmonary cyst formation. We used data from the Multicenter International Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Efficacy of Sirolimus (MILES) trial to assess the usefulness of serum VEGF-D concentration as a marker of severity and therapeutic response to sirolimus in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis. METHODS: In the MILES trial, patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis who had forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 70% or less of predicted were randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 months masked treatment with sirolimus or placebo. Serum VEGF-D concentrations were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. We used a linear regression model to assess associations of baseline VEGF-D concentrations with markers of disease severity, and a linear mixed effects model to assess the associations of VEGF-D concentrations with between-group differences in clinical, physiological, and patient-reported outcomes. FINDINGS: We included 42 patients from the placebo group and 45 from the sirolimus group in our analysis. Baseline VEGF-D concentrations in individual patients varied from 0·34 ng/mL to 16·7 ng/mL. Baseline VEGF-D concentrations were higher in patients who needed supplemental oxygen than in those who did not need supplemental oxygen (1·7 ng/mL [IQR 0·99­3·36] vs 0·84 ng/mL [0·52­1·39]; p<0·0001) and in those who had a bronchodilator response than in those who did not (2·01 ng/mL [0·99­2·86] vs 1·00 ng/mL [0·61­2·15]; 0·0273). Median serum VEGF-D concentrations were similar at baseline in the sirolimus and placebo groups, and fell from baseline at 6 and 12 months in the sirolimus group but remained roughly stable in the placebo group. Each one-unit increase in baseline log(VEGF-D) was associated with a between-group difference in baseline-to-12-month FEV1 change of 134 mL (p=0·0007). In the sirolimus group, improvement in baseline-to-12-month FEV1 occurred in 15 of 23 (65%) VEGF-D responders (ie, those in whom baseline-to-12-month VEGF-D concentrations decreased by more than they did in any patients in the placebo group) and four of 15 (27%) VEGF-D non-responders (p=0·0448). INTERPRETATION: Serum VEGF-D is a biologically plausible and useful biomarker in lymphangioleiomyomatosis that correlates with disease severity and treatment response. Measurement of serum VEGF-D concentrations could inform the risk­benefit analysis of sirolimus therapy in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and reduce the numbers of patients needed for clinical trials. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Defense.