Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 52(3): 274-85, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18358567

ABSTRACT

More than 1 million individuals in the United States are HIV positive, with greater than 40,000 new patients being diagnosed per year. With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV-infected patients in the United States are living longer. HIV-infected patients receiving HAART now more commonly have noninfectious and nonopportunistic complications of their disease. This review article will discuss the assessment and treatment of HIV-positive patients in the era of HAART, with an emphasis on the noninfectious and changing infectious complications that require emergency care.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Anti-Retroviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , HIV Infections , Mental Disorders/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Drug Interactions , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Gastrointestinal Diseases/physiopathology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/psychology , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Risk Factors , Skin Diseases/complications
2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 81(1): 184-9, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26953754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Briefing of the trauma team before patient arrival is unstructured in many centers. We surveyed trauma teams regarding agreement on patient care priorities and evaluated the impact of a structured, physician-led briefing on concordance during simulated resuscitations. METHODS: Trauma nurses at our Level II center were surveyed, and they participated in four resuscitation scenarios, randomized to "briefed" or "nonbriefed." For nonbriefed scenarios, nurses independently reviewed triage sheets with written information. Briefed scenarios had a structured 4-minute physician-led briefing reviewing triage sheets identical to nonbriefed scenarios. Teams included three to four nurses (subjects) and two to four confederates (physicians, respiratory therapists). Each team served as their own control group. Confederates were blinded to nurses' briefed or nonbriefed status. Immediately before, and at the midpoint of each scenario, nurses estimated patients' morbidity and mortality and ranked the top 3 of 16 designated immediate care priorities. Briefed and nonbriefed groups' responses were compared for (1) agreement using intraclass correlation coefficient, (2) concordance with physicians' responses using the Fisher exact test, (3) teamwork via T-NOTECHS ratings by nurses and physicians using t-test, and (4) time to complete clinical tasks using t test. RESULTS: Thirty-eight nurses participated. Ninety-seven percent "agreed/strongly agreed" briefing is important, but only 46% agreed briefing was done well. Comparing briefed versus nonbriefed scenarios, nurses' estimation of morbidity and mortality in the briefed scenarios showed significantly greater agreement with each other and with physicians' answers (p < 0.01). Rank lists also better agreed with each other (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64 vs 0.59) and with physicians' answers in the briefed scenarios. T-NOTECHS Leadership ratings were significantly higher in the briefed scenarios (3.70 vs 3.39; p < 0.01). Time to completion of key clinical tasks was significantly faster for one of the briefed scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Discordant perceptions of patient care goals was frequently observed. Structured physician-led briefing seemed to improve interprofessional team concordance, leadership, and task completion in simulated trauma resuscitations.


Subject(s)
Communication , Interprofessional Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Resuscitation/standards , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Decision Making , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Professional Competence , Triage
3.
Am J Surg ; 211(2): 482-8, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26801092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trauma care requires coordinating an interprofessional team, with formative feedback on teamwork skills. We hypothesized nurses and surgeons have different perceptions regarding roles during resuscitation; that nurses' teamwork self-assessment differs from experts', and that video debriefing might improve accuracy of self-assessment. METHODS: Trauma nurses and surgeons were surveyed regarding resuscitation responsibilities. Subsequently, nurses joined interprofessional teams in simulated trauma resuscitations. After each resuscitation, nurses and teamwork experts independently scored teamwork (T-NOTECHS). After video debriefing, nurses repeated T-NOTECHS self-assessment. RESULTS: Nurses and surgeons assumed significantly more responsibility by their own profession for 71% of resuscitation tasks. Nurses' overall T-NOTECHS ratings were slightly higher than experts'. This was evident in all T-NOTECHS subdomains except "leadership," but despite statistical significance the difference was small and clinically irrelevant. Video debriefing did not improve the accuracy of self-assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses and physicians demonstrated discordant perceptions of responsibilities. Nurses' self-assessment of teamwork was statistically, but not clinically significantly, higher than experts' in all domains except physician leadership.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , Professional Role , Resuscitation , Self-Assessment , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Trauma Centers , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL