ABSTRACT
Starting in 2015, pediatric rheumatology fellowship training programs were required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to assess fellows' academic performance within 21 subcompetencies falling under six competency domains. Each subcompetency had four or five milestone levels describing developmental progression of knowledge and skill acquisition. Milestones were standardized across all pediatric subspecialties. As part of the Milestones 2.0 revision project, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education convened a workgroup in 2022 to write pediatric rheumatology-specific milestones. Using adult rheumatology's Milestones 2.0 as a starting point, the workgroup revised the patient care and medical knowledge subcompetencies and milestones to reflect requirements and nuances of pediatric rheumatology care. Milestones within four remaining competency domains (professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice) were standardized across all pediatric subspecialties, and therefore not revised. The workgroup created a supplemental guide with explanations of the intent of each subcompetency, 25 in total, and examples for each milestone level. The new milestones are an important step forward for competency-based medical education in pediatric rheumatology. However, challenges remain. Milestone level assignment is meant to be informed by results of multiple assessment methods. The lack of pediatric rheumatology-specific assessment tools typically result in clinical competency committees determining trainee milestone levels without such collated results as the foundation of their assessments. Although further advances in pediatric rheumatology fellowship competency-based medical education are needed, Milestones 2.0 importantly establishes the first pediatric-specific rheumatology Milestones to assess fellow performance during training and help measure readiness for independent practice.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , Pediatrics , Rheumatology , Rheumatology/education , Rheumatology/standards , Humans , Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Pediatrics/education , Pediatrics/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Examine levels of candidate blood-based biomarkers (CBB) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with tofacitinib. METHODS: JIA patients who participated in clinical trial NCT02592434 received tofacitinib from baseline to week 18. Serial serum samples were assayed for CBB (S100A8/9, S100A12, IL-18, SAA, resistin, VEGF, Angiopoietin-1, Angiopoietin-2, MMP8, MMP2, TIMP1, Leptin, CXCL9, sIL2R, ICAM-1, sTNFr, IL-6, IL-23, MCP1, CCL18, and CCL20). Association of CBB with JIA response to treatment from baseline to week 18 were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 166 patients with polyarticular-course JIA. Paired serum samples from 143 patients were available at both baseline and week 18. There were 35% (50/143) of patients with a JIA-American College of Rheumatology 90 (JIA-ACR90) level improvement while 90/121/137 (63%/85%/96%) achieved JIA-ACR70/50/30 improvement at wk18. Despite small numerical differences by JIA category, there were no baseline CBB values that independently predicted a decrease in JADAS-27 or JIA-ACR90 response by week 18. Decrease in resistin level (baseline to week 18) was significantly associated with wk18 improvement in JADAS-27 and JIA-ACR90 response, after adjusting for age, sex, JIA disease duration and baseline resistin [(r2 0.79, SE, 0.070, p<0.01 and OR(95%CI) = 1.134(1.018, 1.264)]. HLA-B27 positivity was significantly associated with not achieving a JIA-ACR90 response at week 18 (p=0.0097). CONCLUSION: Among the CBB included, only resistin was significantly associated with treatment response, and no CBB was identified that forecasts JIA improvement after initiation of tofacitinib. The association of HLA-B27 positivity with lower response to tofacitinib in JIA is intriguing and merits further study.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for patients with refractory moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: The Biologics Workgroup of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance JDM Research Committee used case-based surveys, consensus framework, and nominal group technique to produce bDMARD CTPs for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM. RESULTS: Four bDMARD CTPs were proposed: tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Each CTP has different options for dosing and/or route. Among 76 respondents, consensus was achieved for the proposed CTPs (93% [67 of 72]) as well as for patient characteristics, assessments, outcome measures, and follow-up. By weighted average, respondents indicated that they would most likely administer rituximab, followed by abatacept, TNFα inhibitor, and tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: CTPs for the administration of bDMARDs in refractory moderately severe JDM were developed using consensus methodology. The implementation of the bDMARD CTPs will lay the groundwork for registry-based prospective comparative effectiveness studies.