A meta-analysis of biological variation in blood-based therapy as a precursor to bio-manufacturing.

Currently cellular therapies, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), are produced at a small scale on a case-by-case basis, usually in a clinical or near-clinical setting. Meeting the demand for future cellular therapies will require a robust and scalable manufacturing process that is either designed around or controls the variation associated with biological starting materials. Understanding variation requires both a measure of the allowable variation (that does not negatively affect patient outcome) and the achievable variation (with current technology). The prevalence of HSCT makes it an ideal case study to prepare for more complex biological manufacturing with more challenging regulatory classifications. A systematic meta-analysis of the medical literature surrounding HSCT has been completed of which the key outcomes are the following: (i) the range of transplanted CD34+ cells/kg can be up to six orders of magnitude around the median for allogeneic procedures and four orders of magnitude for autologous procedures, (ii) there is no improvement in variation encountered over a period of 30 years and (iii) as study size increases, the amount of variation encountered also increases. A more detailed, stratified source from a controlled single-site clinical center is required to further define a control strategy for the manufacture of biologics.

Establishing the variation of blood metrics within UK Biobank to inform cell therapy manufacturing processes.

Aim: Understanding blood component variation as a function of healthy population metrics is necessary to inform biomanufacturing process design. Methods: UK Biobank metrics were examined for variation in white blood cell count as an analog to potential manufacturing starting material input. Results: White blood cell count variation of four orders of magnitude (6.65 × 109 cells/l) was found. Variation increased with age, increased with weight up to 80 kg then decreased. Health state showed a greater absolute number of participants with elevated count. Female range was greater than male. Cell count/distributions were different between centers. Conclusion: This variation and range of process input signals a requirement for new strategies for manufacturing process design and control.

Comparability: manufacturing, characterization and controls, report of a UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Pluripotent Stem Cell Platform Workshop, Trinity Hall, Cambridge, 14-15 September 2015.

This paper summarizes the proceedings of a workshop held at Trinity Hall, Cambridge to discuss comparability and includes additional information and references to related information added subsequently to the workshop. Comparability is the need to demonstrate equivalence of product after a process change; a recent publication states that this 'may be difficult for cell-based medicinal products'. Therefore a well-managed change process is required which needs access to good science and regulatory advice and developers are encouraged to seek help early. The workshop shared current thinking and best practice and allowed the definition of key research questions. The intent of this report is to summarize the key issues and the consensus reached on each of these by the expert delegates.