Peri-procedural antithrombotic management: time to burn the bridge?

Emerging evidence suggests the use of peri-procedural bridging during interruptions in warfarin therapy increases bleed risk without reducing thromboembolic events. We implemented a peri-procedural anticoagulant management risk assessment tool in a single, outpatient anticoagulation clinic within an academic teaching institution. In this retrospective, pre-post observational study, we evaluated adults who required an interruption in warfarin therapy for an invasive procedure. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received bridging prior to and following implementation of the tool. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and other surgical complications within 30 days of the index procedure. In total, 149 patients were included. Bridging was recommended in 60% of the pre-intervention group and in 39.3% of the post-intervention group (p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the groups. However, patients who received bridging had numerically more bleeding events than patients who did not (12.3 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.102), and patients who received therapeutic dose bridging had more bleeding events than those who received modified dose bridging (10.9 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.466). Following implementation of the tool, there was a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients who received bridging without an increase in thromboembolic events. There were numerically higher rates of bleeding in those who received bridging. Additional research is needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of prophylactic versus treatment dose bridging and how implementation of peri-procedural antithrombotic tools reflecting the emerging evidence will affect patient outcomes, satisfaction and healthcare costs.

Care transitions service: a pharmacy-driven program for medication reconciliation through the continuum of care.

PURPOSE: A quality-improvement program at University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) encompassing admission, discharge, and postdischarge medication reconciliation activities is described, with a report on initial assessments of the program's impact on rates of medication-related problems (MRPs). METHODS: Pharmacists conducted a five-month evaluation of the UNMH Care Transitions Service (CTS), which serves inpatients admitted to the hospital's family medicine service, providing medication reconciliation and targeted MRP interventions. Selected patients who received CTS services from November 2012 through March 2013 (n = 191) were included in the analysis. The study endpoints were the rates and types of MRPs identified, the most commonly implicated medication classes, and predictors of MRPs. Postdischarge MRP rates during a two-month trial of CTS services at a UNMH outpatient clinic were also evaluated. RESULTS: During the five-month evaluation of inpatient CTS services, a total of 1140 MRPs were identified (an average of 6 per patient), about 70% of which were resolved independently of provider review using pharmacy-driven protocols. During the two-month pilot test of CTS outpatient services (n = 16), a total of 28 MRPs were identified; in over 80% of cases, there was a decline in the number of MRPs from the admission to the postdischarge medication reconciliation. CONCLUSION: MRPs were identified through the continuum of care. The majority of MRPs identified in both the inpatient and outpatient settings involved patient variables and patient nonadherence. Seventy percent of inpatient MRPs were resolved independently by the CTS team under pharmacy-driven protocols.