Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Tumour Biol ; 32(1): 145-57, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20820980

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to evaluate the interaction between breast cancer cells and nodal fibroblasts, by means of their gene expression profile. Fibroblast primary cultures were established from negative and positive lymph nodes from breast cancer patients and a similar gene expression pattern was identified, following cell culture. Fibroblasts and breast cancer cells (MDA-MB231, MDA-MB435, and MCF7) were cultured alone or co-cultured separated by a porous membrane (which allows passage of soluble factors) for comparison. Each breast cancer lineage exerted a particular effect on fibroblasts viability and transcriptional profile. However, fibroblasts from positive and negative nodes had a parallel transcriptional behavior when co-cultured with a specific breast cancer cell line. The effects of nodal fibroblasts on breast cancer cells were also investigated. MDA MB-231 cells viability and migration were enhanced by the presence of fibroblasts and accordingly, MDA-MB435 and MCF7 cells viability followed a similar pattern. MDA-MB231 gene expression profile, as evaluated by cDNA microarray, was influenced by the fibroblasts presence, and HNMT, COMT, FN3K, and SOD2 were confirmed downregulated in MDA-MB231 co-cultured cells with fibroblasts from both negative and positive nodes, in a new series of RT-PCR assays. In summary, transcriptional changes induced in breast cancer cells by fibroblasts from positive as well as negative nodes are very much alike in a specific lineage. However, fibroblasts effects are distinct in each one of the breast cancer lineages, suggesting that the inter-relationships between stromal and malignant cells are dependent on the intrinsic subtype of the tumor.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Fibroblasts/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/physiology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Movement , Cells, Cultured , Coculture Techniques , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
PLoS One ; 9(7): e101656, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25006670

ABSTRACT

The influence of genetic factors may contribute to the poor prognosis of breast cancer (BC) at a very young age. However BRCA1/2 mutations could not explain the majority of cases arising in these patients. MicroRNAs (miRs) have been implicated in biological processes associated with BC. Therefore, we investigated differences in miRs expression between tumors from young patients (≤35 years) with sporadic or familial history and non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. Thirty-six young Brazilian patients were divided into 2 groups: sporadic (NF-BC) or familial breast cancer (F-BC). Most of the samples were classified as luminal A and B and the frequency of subtypes did not differ between familial or sporadic cases. Using real time qPCR and discriminant function analysis, we identified 9 miRs whose expression levels rather than miR identity can discriminate between both patient groups. Candidate predicted targets were determined by combining results from miRWalk algorithms with mRNA expression profiles (n = 91 differently expressed genes). MiR/mRNA integrated analysis identified 91 candidate genes showing positive or negative correlation to at least 1 of the 9 miRs. Co-expression analysis of these genes with 9 miRs indicated that 49 differentially co-expressed miR-gene interactions changes in F-BC tumors as compared to those of NF-BC tumors. Out of 49, 17 (34.6%) of predicted miR-gene interactions showed an inverse correlation suggesting that miRs act as post-transcriptional regulators, whereas 14 (28.6%) miR-gene pairs tended to be co-expressed in the same direction indicating that the effects exerted by these miRs pointed to a complex level of target regulation. The remaining 18 pairs were not predicted by our criteria suggesting involvement of other regulators. MiR-mRNA co-expression analysis allowed us to identify changes in the miR-mRNA regulation that were able to distinguish tumors from familial and sporadic young BC patients non-carriers of BRCA mutations.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , Transcriptome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL