Treatment of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy by Endoscopic Internal Drainage (EID).

BACKGROUND: Leaks are considered one of the major complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with a reported rate up to 7 %. Drainage of the collection coupled with SEMS deployment is the most frequent treatment. Its success is variable and burdened by high morbidity and not irrelevant mortality. The aim of this paper is to suggest and establish a new approach by endoscopic internal drainage (EID) for the management of leaks. METHODS: Since March 2013, 67 patients presenting leak following LSG were treated with deployment of double pigtail plastic stents across orifice leak, positioning one end inside the collection and the other end in remnant stomach. The aim of EID is to internally drain the collection and at the same time promote leak healing. RESULTS: Double pigtails stent were successfully delivered in 66 out of 67 patients (98.5 %). Fifty patients were cured by EID after a mean time of 57.5 days and an average of 3.14 endoscopic sessions. Two died for event not related to EID. Nine are still under treatment; five failure had been registered. Six patients developed late stenosis treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: EID proved to be a valid, curative, and safe mini-invasive approach for treatment of leaks following SG. EID achieves complete drainage of perigastric collections and stimulates mucosal growth over the stent. EID is well tolerated, allows early re-alimentation, and it is burdened by fewer complications than others technique. Long-term follow-up confirms good outcomes with no motility or feeding alterations.

Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis during Helicobacter pylori infection is reduced by antibiotic treatment.

AIM: To evaluate clinical, biological and immunological features of patients with increased duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and its relation to Helicobacter pylori (HP) and coeliac disease (CD). METHODS: We have studied all patients accrued over a 4-year period with increased duodenal IELs. Those patients were recalled for biological and immunological evaluation and a second endoscopy. RESULTS: Twenty-three from a total of 639 patients were identified and 17 of them were included in the study. The median duodenal IEL count was 59 per 100 epithelial cells. Twelve (71%) patients were HP+; eight of them received HP eradication. At the second endoscopy the duodenal IEL count was significantly lower 2 months after HP eradication (73 versus 28), while the IEL count was unchanged in those patients seronegative for HP (n = 5) or those in whom it was not eradicated (n = 4) (55 versus 55). No patient had coeliac antibodies, four expressed HLA-DQ2, lower than in the general population, and the prevalence of CD was 2% (12/639 patients). CONCLUSION: In some cases an increased duodenal IEL count may be due to an inappropriate host response to HP. HP screening and eradication should be considered before recommending a gluten-free diet.

A comparison of some methods for the determination of methoxyl groups in commercial pectin preparations.

The results of methoxyl groups determination in pectin preparations were compared. The methods of direct (I, II) and indirect (III, IV) methanol determination connected with enzymatic (II, IV) or alkaline (I, III) pectin demethylation were applied. Higher values were obtained using indirect methanol methods than in the case of a direct methanol determination. The difference between these groups of methods was statistically significant. The precision of all the methods was high. The degree of methylation (DM) was calculated based on methanol content; moreover in the methods III and IV it was also determined from the ratio of methylated carboxyl groups to a total of acidic groups. From the difference (%) between these two ways of calculating DM the purity of pectin can be determined. The method based on enzymatic demethylation and direct methanol analysis is recommended as a precise and selective one.