ABSTRACT
Several terminologies have been employed in the dental literature to describe the roots and root canal systems of mandibular molars with no consensus being arrived at, thus far. The anatomical relation of roots and their root canals were identified and a naming system was formulated. The proposed nomenclature attempts to make certain essential modifications to the traditional approach to accommodate the naming of various aberrations presented in mandibular molars. A simple, yet extensive nomenclature system has been proposed that appropriately names the internal and external morphology of mandibular molars.
ABSTRACT
AIM: This study comparatively evaluated the efficacy of Endovac irrigation system with conventional needle irrigation in removing smear layer from the root canal. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty permanent maxillary central incisors were divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each. In group I, the teeth were instrumented and irrigated by conventional irrigation using 27-gauge irrigation needle. In group II, irrigation was done using Endovac irrigation system. In group III (negative control) chemomechanical preparation was performed using saline solution. Scanning electron microscope evaluation was done for assessment of smear layer removal in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using post hoc test and Kruskal-Wallis test for significance at P < .05. Statistically significant difference was seen between the 2 test groups in smear layer removal from the apical third (3 mm) of the root canal, although no significant difference was seen in the coronal and middle thirds. The most efficient smear layer removal was seen in group II (Endovac) compared with other groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significantly better removal of smear layer from the apical third of root canal using Endovac compared with conventional needle irrigation.