Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
1.
Blood ; 143(24): 2534-2543, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657278

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: There is a paucity of information on how to select the most appropriate unrelated donor (UD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 10/10 matched UDs (MUDs) and 9/10 mismatched UDs (MMUDs) that may affect transplant outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first or second complete remission (CR1 or CR2). The primary end point was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Overall, 1011 patients were included with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-77). Donors had a median age of 29 years (range, 18-64); 304 (30%) were females, of which 150 (15% of the whole group) were donors to male recipients, and 621 (61%) were MUDs; 522 (52%) had negative cytomegalovirus (CMV-neg) serostatus, of which 189 (19%) were used for CMV-neg recipients. Donor age older than 30 years had a negative impact on relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.8), LFS (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), overall survival (HR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) free, relapse-free survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56). In addition, CMV-neg donors for CMV-neg recipients were associated with improved LFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99). The use of MMUD and female donors for male recipients did not significantly impact any transplant outcomes. For patients undergoing HSCT from a UD with PTCy for AML, donor age <30 years significantly improves survival. In this context, donor age might be prioritized over HLA match considerations. In addition, CMV-neg donors are preferable for CMV-neg recipients. However, further research is needed to validate and refine these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Unrelated Donors , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Adolescent , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Histocompatibility Testing , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , HLA Antigens/immunology , Disease-Free Survival
2.
Ann Hematol ; 103(3): 981-992, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092996

ABSTRACT

Despite lower virulence, the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a relevant threat for immunocompromised patients. A retrospective multicentric study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) with a 6-month follow-up for preventing severe COVID-19 in adult patients with hematology malignancy. Among the 606 patients in the cohort, 96 (16%) contracted COVID-19 with a median of 98.5 days after Evusheld administration. A total of 75% of patients had asymptomatic or mild severity of COVID-19, while just 25% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 positivity had to be hospitalized. Two patients (2%) died directly, and one patient (1%) in association with COVID-19. Eight patients (1.3%) of every cohort experienced adverse events related to Evusheld, mostly grade 1 and of reversible character. It was found that complete vaccination status or positive seroconversion was not associated with lower risk of COVID-19 infection. Previous treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was associated with higher rates of COVID-19, while previous treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody was not, as was the case for recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CAR-T cell therapy. Presence of other comorbidities was not associated with more severe COVID-19. The results support the growing evidence for Evusheld's efficacy against severe COVID-19 in patients with hematology malignancies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Czech Republic , Retrospective Studies , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology
3.
Am J Hematol ; 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856236

ABSTRACT

We compared relapse incidence (RI) post-unrelated transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) versus no PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, in 7049 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in remission, 707 with PTCy, and 6342 without (No PTCy). The patients in the PTCy group were younger, 52.7 versus 56.6 years (p < .001). There were more 9/10 donors in the PTCy group, 33.8% versus 16.4% (p < .001), and more received myeloablative conditioning, 61.7% versus 50.2% (p < .001). In the No PTCy group, 87.7% of patients received in vivo T-cell depletion. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were lower in the PTCy versus No PTCy group, 93.8% and 80.9% versus 97.6% and 92.6% (p < .001). RI was not significantly different in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.37) (p = .31). Acute GVHD grades II-IV and III-IV, were significantly lower in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.92, p = .007) and HR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.83, p = .004), as were total and extensive chronic GVHD, HRs of 0.5 (95% CI 0.41-0.62, p < .001) and HR = 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.42, p < .001). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower with PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.5-0.91, p = .007). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.81, p = .001). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the groups. In summary, we observed comparable RI, OS, and LFS, significantly lower incidences of GVHD and NRM, and significantly higher GRFS in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with PTCy versus No PTCy GVHD prophylaxis.

4.
Am J Hematol ; 99(7): 1250-1256, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778766

ABSTRACT

In the context of T-cell replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), it is still unknown whether peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) is the best graft source. While PB is associated with a higher incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), it may induce a stronger graft-versus-leukemia effect compared to BM, notably in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). From the EBMT registry database, we compared T-cell replete PB (n = 595) versus BM (n = 209) grafts in a large cohort of 804 patients over the age of 60 years who underwent Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy for an AML in first or second complete remission. The risk of acute GVHD was significantly higher in the PB group (Grade II-IV: HR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.10-2.54], p = 0.01; Grade III-IV: HR = 2.29, 95% CI [1.16-4.54], p = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in chronic GVHD or non-relapse mortality. In the PB group, the risk of relapse was significantly lower in the PB group (HR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.45-0.94], p = 0.02) and leukemia-free survival was significantly better (HR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.59-0.99], p = 0.04), with a trend toward better overall survival (HR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.60-1.01], p = 0.06). We conclude that in the specific context of Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy, PB grafts represent a valid option to decrease the risk of relapse and improve outcome of older AML patients who usually do not benefit from conditioning intensification.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Remission Induction , Transplantation Conditioning , Humans , Middle Aged , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Female , Aged , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Europe , Registries , Pathologic Complete Response
5.
Am J Hematol ; 99(7): 1290-1299, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654658

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended for core-binding factor mutated (CBF) AML patients achieving second complete remission (CR2). However, approximately 20% of patients may relapse after transplant and donor preference remains unclear. We compared in this EBMT global multicenter registry-based analysis the allo-HCT outcomes using either haploidentical (Haplo), matched siblings donors (MSD), or 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD). Data from 865 de novo adult CBF AML patients in CR2 receiving allo-HCT in 227 EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed, in which 329 MSD, 374 MUD, and 162 Haplo-HCTs were included. For the entire cohort, 503 (58%) patients were inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 and 362 patients (42%) were t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML. On multivariate analysis, Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower Relapse Incidence (RI) compared to either MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p < .05) or MUD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p < .05). No significant difference was observed among the 3 types of donors on LFS, OS and GRFS. CBF-AML with t(8;21) was associated with both higher RI (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.47; p < .01) and higher NRM (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.1-2.27; p < .01) than CBF-AML with inv(16), which led to worse LFS, OS and GRFS. To conclude, for CBF-AML patients in CR2, Haplo-HCTs were associated with a lower RI compared to MSD and MUD allo-HCTs. There was no difference on LFS, OS or GRFS. CBF AML patients with inv(16) had a better progonosis than those with t(8;21) after allo-HCT in CR2.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Recurrence , Siblings , Unrelated Donors , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Incidence , Aged , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Adolescent , Registries , Core Binding Factors/genetics , Young Adult , Remission Induction , Allografts , Europe
6.
Cancer ; 129(23): 3735-3745, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare two immunosuppressive strategies, based on the use of either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY), as a prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission who underwent hematopoietic cells transplantation from matched unrelated donors. METHODS: Overall, 117 and 779 adult patients who received PTCY and ATG, respectively, between the years 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The median patient age was 40 and 43 years in the PTCY and ATG groups, respectively, and 37% and 35% of patients, respectively, had Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the study groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was reduced in the PTCY group (18% vs. 25%; p = .046) without a significant impact on nonrelapse mortality (11% vs. 16% in the ATG group; p = .29). The rates of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival were 71% versus 59%, respectively (p = .01), and 82% versus 74%, respectively (p = .08). In multivariate analysis, the receipt of ATG compared with PTCY was associated with a reduced risk of extensive chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.98; p = .04) and an increased risk of low LFS (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.45; p = .045). CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of ATG compared with PTCY, despite the reduced risk of extensive chronic GVHD, is associated with inferior LFS in adults with ALL who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation from 10/10 human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors. These findings warrant verification in prospective trials.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Humans , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Unrelated Donors , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Bone Marrow , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Transplantation Conditioning
7.
Br J Haematol ; 201(6): 1169-1178, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36949658

ABSTRACT

Pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) predicts relapse and outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The impact of MRD on the outcomes of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based allo-HCT from a matched unrelated donor (UD) is unknown. This study assessed the impact of MRD in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in the first complete remission (CR1). A total of 272 patients (MRD negative [MRD-], n = 165; MRD positive [MRD+], n = 107) with a median follow-up of 19 (range: 16-24) months were studied. The incidence of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD at day 180 was 25.2% and 25% (p = 0.99), and 10.6% and 6.8% (p = 0.29), respectively, and 2-year chronic GVHD was 35% and 30.4% (p = 0.96) in MRD+ and MRD- cohorts, respectively. In multivariate analysis, MRD+ status was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (RI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.39-4.72), lower leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.23-3.39), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.04-3.25) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.10-2.58). MRD status did not have a significant impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM), or acute or chronic GVHD risk. Among patients with AML undergoing UD allo-HCT with PTCy, pre-transplant MRD+ status predicted a higher relapse rate, lower LFS, OS and GRFS.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Unrelated Donors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Retrospective Studies
8.
Cancer ; 128(22): 3959-3968, 2022 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. METHODS: The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010-2020. RESULTS: The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19-73) and 38 (18-75) years, respectively (p = .51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p < .0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109 /L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-2.62; p = .21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52-1.28, p = .38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73-1.50, p = .8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77-1.76, p = .46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78-1.46, p = .7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2-4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08-2.76, p = .023), whereas aGVHD grade 3-4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Humans , Unrelated Donors , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , HLA Antigens , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects
9.
Am J Hematol ; 97(8): 1065-1074, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35696192

ABSTRACT

The best stem cell source for T-cell replete human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remains to be determined. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation retrospective study, we analyzed the impact of stem cell source on leukemia-free survival (LFS) in adult patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) given grafts from HLA-haploidentical donors with PTCy as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. A total of 668 patients (249 bone marrow [BM] and 419 peripheral blood stem cells [PBSC] recipients) met the inclusion criteria. The use of PBSC was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV (HR = 1.59, p = .029) and grade III-IV (HR = 2.08, p = .013) acute GVHD. There was a statistical interaction between patient age and the impact of stem cell source for LFS (p < .01). In multivariate Cox models, among patients <55 years, the use of PBSC versus BM resulted in comparable LFS (HR = 0.82, p = .2). In contrast, in patients ≥55 years of age, the use of PBSC versus BM was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 1.7, p = .01), lower LFS (HR = 1.37, p = .026) and lower overall survival (HR = 1.33, p = .044). In conclusions, our data suggest that in patients ≥55 years of age with active AML at HLA-haploidentical transplantation, the use of BM instead of PBSC as stem cell source results in lower NRM and better LFS. In contrast among younger patients, the use of PBSC results in at least a comparable LFS.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells , Adult , Bone Marrow , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , HLA Antigens/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects
10.
Br J Haematol ; 186(2): 300-310, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968396

ABSTRACT

In this multi-centre study, we analysed the prognostic impact of mutations in 19 genes associated with myeloid malignancies in 258 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia patients (aged 19-70 years) undergoing intensive therapy. We identified five patient groups with different prognostic risks and different benefits from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) within the intermediate cytogenetic risk group patients (n = 184). The most adverse prognosis was observed in patients with DNMT3A and FLT3-ITD co-mutation, whose survival could be significantly improved with alloHSCT. In contrast, the most favourable prognosis without any further benefit from alloHSCT was identified in patients with mutations in NPM1 or CEBPA, after exclusion of the unfavourable prognostic groups defined by mutations in DNMT3A, RUNX1 or genes from chromatin/spliceosome group. An additional analysis of 113 diagnosis-remission paired samples revealed that persistence of non-DNMT3A mutations (above 2% VAF) represented a further negative prognostic factor. The proposed model offers a possible molecular stratification and treatment guidance for intermediate cytogenetic risk group patients.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Mutation , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleophosmin , Prognosis , Risk Factors
11.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 52(7): 619-35, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23580398

ABSTRACT

Chromosome 11 abnormalities are found in many hematological malignancies. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a proto-oncogene MLL (11q23.3) is frequently altered. However, rearrangements involving other regions of chromosome 11 have been reported. Therefore, we have characterized the chromosome 11 breakpoints and common deleted and amplified areas in the bone marrow or peripheral blood cells of newly diagnosed patients with AML. Using molecular-cytogenetic methods (multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH), multicolor banding (mBAND), microarrays, and FISH with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) probes, chromosome 11 abnormalities were delineated in 54 out of 300 (18%) newly diagnosed AML patients. At least 36 different chromosome 11 breakpoints were identified; two were recurrent (11p15.4 in the NUP98 gene and 11q23.3 in the MLL gene), and three were possibly nonrandom: 11p13 (ch11:29.31-31.80 Mb), 11p12 (ch11:36.75-37.49 Mb) and 11q13.2 (68.31-68.52 Mb). One new MLL gene rearrangement is also described. No commonly deleted region of chromosome 11 was identified. However, some regions were affected more often: 11pter-11p15.5 (n = 4; ch11:0-3.52 Mb), 11p14.1-11p13 (n = 4; ch11:28.00-31.00 Mb) and 11p13 (n = 4; ch11:31.00-31.50 Mb). One commonly duplicated (3 copies) region was identified in chromosomal band 11q23.3-11q24 (n = 9; ch11:118.35-125.00 Mb). In all eight cases of 11q amplification (>3 copies), only the 5' part of the MLL gene was affected. This study highlights several chromosome 11 loci that might be important for the leukemogeneic process in AML.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Breakpoints , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chromosome Aberrations , Female , Gene Amplification , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Proto-Oncogene Mas , Young Adult
12.
Clin Epigenetics ; 16(1): 17, 2024 01 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Changes in DNA methylation are common events in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and have been repeatedly reported as associated with prognosis. However, studies integrating these numerous and potentially prognostically relevant DNA methylation changes are lacking. Therefore, we aimed for an overall evaluation of these epigenetic aberrations to provide a comprehensive NGS-based approach of DNA methylation assessment for AML prognostication. RESULTS: We designed a sequencing panel targeting 239 regions (approx. 573 kb of total size) described in the literature as having a prognostic impact or being associated with AML pathogenesis. Diagnostic whole-blood DNA samples of adult AML patients divided into a training (n = 128) and a testing cohort (n = 50) were examined. The libraries were prepared using SeqCap Epi Enrichments System (Roche) and sequenced on MiSeq instrument (Illumina). Altogether, 1935 CpGs affecting the survival (p < 0.05) were revealed in the training cohort. A summarizing value MethScore was then calculated from these significant CpGs. Patients with lower MethScore had markedly longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) than those with higher MethScore (p < 0.001). The predictive ability of MethScore was verified on the independent testing cohort for OS (p = 0.01). Moreover, the proof-of-principle validation was performed using the TCGA dataset. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that comprehensive NGS-based approach of DNA methylation assessment revealed a robust epigenetic signature relevant to AML outcome. We called this signature MethScore and showed it might serve as a strong prognostic marker able to refine survival probability of AML patients.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Prognosis , Epigenomics , Progression-Free Survival
13.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598754

ABSTRACT

We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploHSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients (pts) with primary refractory (PR) / first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (n=129) versus those of de novo AML (n=590), transplanted between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of pts with sAML versus de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs. 58.6%) (p=0.002). In 81.4% of sAML pts, the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs. 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (p=0.13). In multivariate analysis HaploHSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups; non-relapse mortality (NRM) hazard ratio (HR) =1.38 (95% CI 0.96-1.98, p=0.083), relapse incidence (RI) HR= 0.68 (95% CI 0.4.7.-1.00, p=0.051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 0.99 (95% CI 0.76-1.28, p=0.94), 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.29, p=0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.27, p=0.94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of HaploHSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison to PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.

14.
Blood Adv ; 8(10): 2332-2341, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429091

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: There is a paucity of information to guide the selection of the most suitable donor in haploidentical (Haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For this reason, from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of Haplo donor characteristics on outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The primary end point was graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). Overall, 2200 patients were included. The median age of donors was 37 years (range, 8-71); 820 (37%) were females, including 458 (21%) who were used for male recipients. In addition, 1631 donors (74%) donated peripheral blood (PB). Multivariable analysis identified certain donor-related risk factors with a detrimental impact on transplant outcomes. The use of PB, older donors' ages (>37 years), and female donors to male recipients negatively affected GRFS. Donor's age and female donor-to-male recipient combination also affected nonrelapse mortality, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival. In conclusion, donor-related variables significantly influence outcomes in patients with AML after Haplo-HSCT with PTCy. When possible, younger donors and male donors for male recipients should be prioritized. The use of bone marrow can additionally prevent GVHD.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Male , Female , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Aged , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Child , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Tissue Donors , Donor Selection
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961258

ABSTRACT

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may impact the outcome of patients undergoing T-cell replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 2427 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission transplanted from a haploidentical (n = 1844) or unrelated donor (UD, n = 583) using cyclosporine A (CSA, 63%) or tacrolimus (TAC, 37%) and PT-Cy/MMF. In univariate analysis, CSA and TAC groups did not differ in 2-year leukemia-free or overall survival, cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse or non-relapse mortality. CI of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower with TAC (6.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02), without difference in grade II-IV acute GVHD or grade III-IV acute GVHD/severe chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). In multivariate analysis, TAC was associated with a lower risk of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD solely with haploidentical donors (HR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98], p = 0.04), but not UD (HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.2-1.21], p = 0.12). There was no significant difference for chronic GVHD. In conclusion, PT-Cy/MMF-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in favorable OS and GRFS, irrespective of the CNI added. In haploidentical HCT, TAC seemed to prevent severe acute GVHD more effectively than CSA without impact on other outcome parameters.

16.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008719

ABSTRACT

Prospective randomized trials have reported a benefit for anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UD). However, the optimal GvHD prophylaxis strategy has been recently challenged by the increasing use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the EBMT registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) undergoing allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GvHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%, p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 4.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 - 4.8), 5-year OS was 58% (95% CI 50-65) with PTCY and 49% (95% CI 46-53%) in the ATG group, p=0.07. 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY with 53% (95% CI 45-60) vs 44% (95% CI 40-48) for ATG, p=0.043. Grade II-IV aGvHD incidence was lower using PTCY (23% [95% CI 17-29%] vs 30% [95% CI 27-33%]), p=0.044 while there was no difference in incidence of cGvHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY, with a HR for ATG of 1.32 (1 - 1.74), p=0.05, and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33 (1.03 - 1.73), p=0.03. This study suggests that GvHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results.

17.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1350470, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629074

ABSTRACT

Optimizing natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity could further improve outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The donor's Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) genotype may provide important information in this regard. In the past decade, different models have been proposed aiming at maximizing NK cell activation by activating KIR-ligand interactions or minimizing inhibitory KIR-ligand interactions. Alternative classifications intended predicting outcome after alloHCT by donor KIR-haplotypes. In the present study, we aimed at validating proposed models and exploring more classification approaches. To this end, we analyzed samples stored at the Collaborative Biobank from HLA-compatible unrelated stem cell donors who had donated for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) and whose outcome data had been reported to EBMT or CIBMTR. The donor KIR genotype was determined by high resolution amplicon-based next generation sequencing. We analyzed data from 5,017 transplants. The median patient age at alloHCT was 56 years. Patients were transplanted for AML between 2013 and 2018. Donor-recipient pairs were matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 (79%) or had single HLA mismatches. Myeloablative conditioning was given to 56% of patients. Fifty-two percent of patients received anti-thymocyte-globulin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, 32% calcineurin-inhibitor-based prophylaxis, and 7% post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis. We tested several previously reported classifications in multivariable regression analyses but could not confirm outcome associations. Exploratory analyses in 1,939 patients (39%) who were transplanted from donors with homozygous centromeric (cen) or telomeric (tel) A or B motifs, showed that the donor cen B/B-tel A/A diplotype was associated with a trend to better event-free survival (HR 0.84, p=.08) and reduced risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 0.65, p=.01). When we further dissected the contribution of B subtypes, we found that only the cen B01/B01-telA/A diplotype was associated with a reduced risk of relapse (HR 0.40, p=.04) while all subtype combinations contributed to a reduced risk of NRM. This exploratory finding has to be validated in an independent data set. In summary, the existing body of evidence is not (yet) consistent enough to recommend use of donor KIR genotype information for donor selection in routine clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Histocompatibility , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Receptors, KIR , Humans , Middle Aged , Genotype , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Ligands , Prognosis , Receptors, KIR/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy
18.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(5): e232-e239, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863897

ABSTRACT

Introduction We report the results of a phase I clinical trial NCT03790072 of an adoptive transfer of γδ T lymphocytes from haploidentical donors in patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after lymphodepletion regimen. Patients and methods Healthy donor mononuclear cells collected by leukapheresis were consistently expanded to generate products of 109 to 1010 γδ T cells. Seven patients received donor-derived T cell product at doses of 106/kg (n = 3), 107/kg (n = 3), and 108/kg (n = 1). Results Four patients had bone marrow evaluation at day 28. One patient had a complete remission, one was classified as morphologic leukemia-free state, one had stable disease and one had no evidence of response. In one patient, there was evidence of disease control with repeat infusions up to 100 days after first dosing. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events or treatment-related Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or greater toxicities at any dose level. Allogeneic Vγ9Vδ2 T cell infusion was shown to be safe and feasible up to a cell dose of 108/kg. Discussion In agreement with previously published studies, the infusion of allogeneic Vγ9Vδ2 cells was safe. The contribution of lymphodepleting chemotherapy to responses seen cannot be ruled out. Main limitation of the study is the low number of patients and interruption due to COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion These positive Phase 1 results support progression to phase II clinical trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Pandemics , Treatment Outcome , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , T-Lymphocytes , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods
19.
Leuk Res ; 130: 107314, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37216792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients are at high risk of complications associated with COVID-19 infection due to dysfunction of their immune system. Vaccination can protect from the adverse consequences of COVID-19. However, studies on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in HSCT recipients with insufficient post-HSCT immune reconstitution are still scarce. In our study, we determined how immunosuppressive medication and the reconstitution of the cellular immune system influenced T cell responses specific for the surface glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 virus (S antigen) after two doses of mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 in patients with myeloid malignancies treated with HSCT. METHODS: Vaccination outcomes were followed in 18 (allo-HSCT) recipients and 8 healthy volunteers. The IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (NCP) protein were determined in ELISA and S-specific T cells were detected using a sensitive ELISPOT-IFNγ based on in vitro expansion and restimulation of T cells in pre- and post-vaccination blood samples. Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood leukocyte differentiation markers was employed for determination of reconstitution of the main subpopulations of T cells and NK cells at month 6 after HSCT. RESULTS: S- specific IgG antibody response detected in 72% of the patients was lower than in healthy vaccinees (100%). Vaccine-induced T-cell responses to S1 or S2 antigen were significantly reduced in HSCT recipients, which were treated with corticosteroids in dose 5 mg of prednisone- equivalents or higher during the vaccination period or in preceeding 100 days in comparison with recipients un-affected with corticosteroids. A significant positive correlation was found between the level of anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike protein IgG antibodies and the number of functional S antigen-specific T cells. Further analysis also showed that the specific response to vaccination was significantly influenced by the interval between administration of vaccine and transplantation. Vaccination outcomes were not related to age, sex, type of mRNA vaccine used, basic diagnosis, HLA match between HSC donor and recipient, and blood counts of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes at the time of vaccination. Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood leukocyte differentiation markers showed that good humoral and cellular S-specific immune responses induced by vaccination were associated with well-reconstituted CD4+ T cells, mainly CD4+ effector memory subpopulation at six months after HSCT. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that both humoral and cellular adaptive immune responses of HSCT recipients to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were significantly suppressed by corticosteroid therapy. Specific response to the vaccine was significantly affected by the length of the interval between HSCT and vaccination. Vaccination as early as 5 months after HSCT can lead to a good response. Immune response to the vaccine is not related to age, gender, HLA match between HSC donor and recipient, or type of myeloid malignancy. Vaccine efficacy was dependent on well-reconstituted CD4+ T cells, at six months after HSCT.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G , Immunosuppression Therapy , mRNA Vaccines , Immunity
20.
J Hematol Oncol ; 16(1): 10, 2023 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36782226

ABSTRACT

The association between graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurrence and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse in patients treated with HLA-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis has remained debated. Here, we addressed this issue in patients with active AML at transplantation. 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 49% and 32.3%, respectively. There were no associations between acute nor chronic GVHD of any grade and lower relapse incidence. However, grade I acute GVHD was associated with better LFS (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, P = 0.04). In contrast, grade III-IV acute (HR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.87-5.12, P < 0.0001) as well as extensive chronic (HR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.81-6.04, P = 0.0001) GVHD correlated with higher nonrelapse mortality leading to lower LFS (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.86, P = 0.056 and HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.35-2.89, P = 0.0004, respectively). In conclusion, these data suggest a dissociation of graft-versus-leukemia effects from GVHD in patients with active AML treated with PTCy-based Haplo-HCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects , Unrelated Donors , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL