Intravenous glutamine supplementation to head trauma patients leaves cerebral glutamate concentration unaffected.

OBJECTIVE: There is reluctance to use glutamine-containing i.v. nutrition for neurosurgical patients, as this may result in elevated intracerebral glutamate levels, which are thought to be associated with neuronal injury and cell swelling, causing an increase in ICP and an unfavourable outcome. As general ICU patients benefit from i.v. glutamine supplementation in terms of reduced mortality and morbidity, neurosurgical patients might also be candidates for such treatment, if the possible relation between i.v. glutamine supplementation and a possible increase in cerebral glutamate could be sorted out. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study protocol had a crossover design with a 24h treatment period and a 24h placebo period in random order. Treatment was a glutamine containing dipeptide, L-alanyl-L-glutamine 200mg/ml, for 20h; placebo was saline. The rate of infusion was 0.125ml/kg/h, which is equal to 0.34g/kg of glutamine over the 20h period. Microdialysate was collected for analysis in 120min portions. The flow through the microdialysis catheter was 0.3microl/min. SUBJECTS: Patients with severe head trauma (GCS

Bosentan-improved cardiopulmonary vascular performance and increased plasma levels of endothelin-1 in porcine endotoxin shock.

1. To evaluate the possible contribution of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to the pathophysiology of porcine septic shock, the non-peptide, mixed ET-receptor antagonist, bosentan (RO 47-0203) was administered (5 mg kg-1, i.v.) 30 min before infusion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (E. coli., serotype 0111:B4) (15 micrograms kg-1 h-1) and at 3.5 h of endotoxaemia in six anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. Six other pigs served as controls and received only LPS infusion. Pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics as well as splenic, renal and intestinal blood flows were measured continuously. Release and synthesis of ET-1 and Big ET-1 were also measured. 2. Only three of the six pigs in the control group survived 3 h of LPS infusion while in the bosentantreated group all six pigs were alive at that time. A biphasic increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was seen in control pigs. Pretreatment with bosentan did not influence the first peak but markedly attenuated the second, more prolonged increase in MPAP and PVR. The second dose of bosentan completely restored these parameters to pre-LPS levels. The LPS-induced changes in mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate and systemic vascular resistance were similar in both groups, while cardiac output (CO) was significantly higher in the bosentan-treated group. The second bosentan dose increased CO and splenic and intestinal blood flow without further lowering of blood pressure. 3. Bosentan caused an increase of the basal arterial plasma levels of ET-1-like immunoreactivity (LI), from 16.8 +/- 1.3 pM to 49.6 +/- 10.0 pM (n = 6, P < 0.01). However, the rate of the increase of ET-1 levels during the LPS infusion was not affected by bosentan. Repeated administration of bosentan during LPS infusion caused an additional increase of ET-1-LI levels. Neither the basal levels of Big ET-LI nor the LPS induced 8 fold increase in Big ET-LI were changed by bosentan. The level of preproET-1 mRNA in the lung was increased about 3 fold after 4.5 h of LPS treatment. This elevation was not influenced by bosentan. 4. From these studies using bosentan, a non-peptide, selective and mixed ET-receptor antagonist, we conclude that during LPS-induced shock bosentan can abolish the late phase pulmonary hypertension and improve cardiac output as well as increase blood flow to the splenic and intestinal vascular beds without causing a further decrease in mean arterial blood pressure. Further investigations in the clinical setting are needed to evaluate the use of ET-receptor antagonists, such as bosentan, in treatment of septic shock.

Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia.

1. The non-selective endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist bosentan has been shown to restore systemic and gut oxygen delivery and reverse intestinal mucosal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock. 2. To further elucidate the specific role of the ETA as opposed to the ETB receptor and their effects in the splanchnic region a non-selective (ET(MIX)ra) A-182086 and selective ETA (ET(A)ra) PD155080 and ETB (ET(B)ra) A-192621 receptor antagonists were administered, separately or simultaneously (ET(A+B)ra) 2 h after onset of endotoxin shock. These four groups were compared to a control group receiving only endotoxin and vehicle. 3. Thirty-nine pigs were anaesthetized and catheterized for measurement of central and regional haemodynamics. A tonometer in the distal ileum was used for measurement of mucosal PCO2. Blood gases and plasma ET-1-LI levels as well as histological samples from the gut were assessed. Intervention was started 2 h after onset of endotoxemia and the experiments were terminated after 5 h. 4. Endotoxin-induced changes in systemic, gut oxygen delivery and portal hepatic vascular resistance and systemic acidosis were effectively counteracted by both ET(A+B)ra an ET(MIX)ra. ET(A)ra administration was not effective while ET(B)ra proved to be fatal as all animals in this group died prior to full time of the experiment. While both ET(A+B)ra and ET(MIX)ra improved gut oxygen delivery only the latter attenuated the profound endotoxin-induced ileal mucosal acidosis. 5. The lethal effect seen from selective ETB receptor antagonism in the current study may be due to increased ETA receptor activity as plasma levels of ET-1 is increased several fold by blocking the ETB receptor and thereby the plasma-ET-1-clearing function. Furthermore, a loss of endothelial ETB receptor vasodilating properties may also have contributed to the lethal course in the ET(B)ra group. 6. The findings in this study suggest that ET is involved in the profound endotoxin-induced disturbances in splanchnic homeostasis in porcine endotoxaemia. Furthermore, antagonism of both ETA and ETB receptors is necessary to effectively counteract these changes.

Effect of cortisol-synthesis inhibition on endotoxin-induced porcine acute lung injury, shock, and nitric oxide production.

In the process of developing a model of Escherichia coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury and shock in specific pathogen-free pigs, the effects of pretreatment with metyrapone (a cortisol-synthesis inhibitor) were examined. Metyrapone was administered 1.5 h before start of endotoxin infusion at t = 0 h (MET-ETOX group, n = 6). At the end of the experiments (t = 4 h) a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed. Control animals received only endotoxin (CON-ETOX group, n = 6) or metyrapone (MET-CON group, n = 4). The following results are presented as means +/- SEM. It was found that metyrapone successfully blocked endogenous cortisol synthesis (plasma cortisol levels were 41.0 +/- 5.9 nM in MET-ETOX vs. 339.0 +/- 37.7 nM in CON-ETOX at t = 4 h, P <0.01). At t = 4 h the MET-ETOX animals had substantially increased systemic hypotension compared to the CON-ETOX group (mean arterial pressure 26.7 +/- 4.3 vs. 77.7 +/- 12.2 mmHg, P <0.01), decreased dynamic lung compliance (10.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 13.7 +/- 0.6 ml/cmH2O, P <0.01), increased percentage of BAL neutrophils (28.4 +/- 6.5 vs. 6.6 +/-1.8, P <0.01), pulmonary edema (BAL total protein 0.82 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.09 mg/mL, P <0.05), elevated levels of interleukin-8 (1924 +/- 275 vs. 324 +/- 131 pg/mL, P <0.01) and acidosis (pH 7.11 +/- 0.03 vs. 7.23 +/- 0.06, P <0.05). The MET-ETOX group also showed an increased pulmonary hypertension between 2 and 3 h after start of endotoxin infusion and a trend toward significantly increased levels of plasma interleukin-8 (P = 0.052). Arterial pCO2, pO2/FiO2, plasma endothelin-1, plasma TNFalpha, and blood leukocytes were not markedly influenced by the plasma cortisol levels. Nitric oxide production did not seem to be altered by endotoxin infusion in this model, in contrast to other animal studies; this discrepancy could be thought to be due to endotoxin-dosage differences or species differences. It is concluded that if endogenous cortisol production is blocked by metyrapone, the reactions occurring as a result of the endotoxin-induced acute lung injury and shock are greatly enhanced and that therefore pretreatment with metyrapone might be an important addition to this model with specific pathogen-free pigs.

Cardiopulmonary dysfunction during porcine endotoxin shock is effectively counteracted by the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan.

In a porcine endotoxin shock model, the mixed nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan was administered 2 h after onset of endotoxemia (n = 8). Cardiopulmonary vascular changes, oxygen-related variables, and plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity were compared with a control group that received only endotoxin (n = 8). Bosentan abolished the progressive increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance seen in controls. Possible mechanisms include blockade of vasoconstrictive endothelin receptors, and a lesser degree of edema and inflammation indicated by less alveolar protein and a lower inflammatory cell count observed in bronchoalveolar lavage. Further, bosentan restored cardiac index to the pre-endotoxin level by an increase in stroke volume index, improved systemic oxygen delivery, and acid base balance. Because mean arterial blood pressure was unaffected, bosentan reduced systemic vascular resistance. Endotoxemia resulted in an increase in tumor necrosis factor-alpha and endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity plasma levels, the latter being further increased by bosentan. In conclusion, in porcine endotoxemia, treatment with the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, administered during fulminate shock, abolished pulmonary hypertension and restored cardiac index. These findings suggest that bosentan could be an effective treatment for reversing a deteriorated cardiopulmonary state during septic shock.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonism increases gut oxygen delivery but fails to improve intestinal mucosal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock.

The renin angiotensin system is highly activated in shock states and has been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of the markedly deteriorated splanchnic circulation seen in septic shock. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the capability of losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, to attenuate splanchnic blood flow disturbances and counteract intestinal mucosal acidosis in endotoxin shock. A total of 20 pigs were anesthetized and catheterized. Central and regional hemodynamics were monitored. A tonometer in the ileum was used for measurement of mucosal pH. Onset of endotoxin challenge was followed by losartan administration (n = 10) 2 h later. Ten animals receiving endotoxin only served as controls. The experiments were terminated 5 h after onset of endotoxin challenge. Endotoxin infusion induced an hypodynamic shock with a reduction in cardiac index and systemic oxygen delivery. Losartan reduced both systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure while stroke volume was improved. Pulmonary hypertension induced by endotoxin was significantly reduced by losartan without further changes in gas exchange. The profound reduction in gut oxygen delivery in response to endotoxin was counteracted by losartan administration. However, losartan failed to improve the markedly deteriorated intestinal mucosal pH and mucosal-arterial PCO2gap (i.e., difference in intestinal mucosal PCO2 and arterial PCO2). Also the mucosal-portal venous PCO2gap, used as a monitor of the mucosa in relation to the gut as a whole (including the spleen and pancreas), was greatly increased by endotoxemia but unaffected by losartan administration. In summary, although the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan improved gut oxygen delivery and reduced pulmonary hypertension during established endotoxin shock, it had no effect on intestinal mucosal acidosis. These findings suggest contribution of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor to perfusion disturbances, but not to deterioration of intestinal mucosal homeostasis seen during endotoxemia.

Comparison of gravimetric and a double-indicator dilution technique for assessment of extra-vascular lung water in endotoxaemia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a molecular double-indicator dilution technique with the gravimetrical reference method for measurement of extra-vascular lung water in porcine endotoxin shock. DESIGN: Open comparative experimental study. SETTING: Animal research laboratory. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In fourteen anaesthetised, mechanically ventilated landrace pigs, central and pulmonary haemodynamics as well as pulmonary gas exchange were measured. Extra-vascular lung water was quantitated gravimetrically as well as with a molecular double indicator dilution technique. Eight of these animals were subjected to endotoxaemia, the rest serving as sham controls. No difference in extra-vascular lung water was observed between the two methods in sham animals. Furthermore, extra-vascular lung water assessed with the molecular double-indicator dilution technique at the initiation of endotoxin infusion did not differ significantly from the corresponding values for sham animals. Endotoxaemia induced a hypodynamic shock with concurrent pulmonary hypertension and a pronounced deterioration in gas exchange. No increase in extra-vascular lung water was detected with the molecular double-indicator dilution technique in response to endotoxin, whereas this parameter was significantly higher when assessed with the gravimetric method. CONCLUSION: The molecular double-indicator dilution technique showed similar results as the gravimetrical method for assessment of extra-vascular lung water in non-endotoxaemic conditions. However, during endotoxin-induced lung injury the molecular double indicator dilution technique failed to detect the significant increase in extra-vascular lung water as measured by the gravimetric method. These data suggest that the molecular double indicator dilution technique may be of limited value during sepsis-induced lung injury.

The endothelin system in septic and endotoxin shock.

The view of the endothelium as a passive barrier has gradually changed as a number of endothelium-derived substances have been discovered. Substances like nitric oxide, prostaglandins and endothelins have potent and important properties, involving not only the circulation as such but also the response to stimuli like inflammation and trauma. The endothelin system, discovered in 1988, has not only strong vasoconstrictor properties, but also immunomodulating, endocrinological and neurological effects exerted through at least two types of receptors. Septic shock, a condition with high mortality, is associated with vast cardiovascular changes, organ dysfunction with microcirculatory disturbances and dysoxia. In the experimental setting, endotoxaemia resembles these changes and is, as well as septic shock, accompanied by a pronounced increase in plasma endothelin levels. The pathophysiology in septic and endotoxin shock remains to be fully elucidated, but several studies indicate that endothelial dysfunction is one contributing mechanism. Activation of the endothelin system is associated with several pathological conditions complicating septic shock, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac dysfunction, splanchnic hypoperfusion and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Through the development of both selective and nonselective endothelin receptor antagonists, the endothelin system has been the object of a large number of studies during the last decade. This review highlights systematically the findings of previous studies in the area. It provides strong indications that the endothelin system, apart from being a marker of vascular injury, is directly involved in the pathophysiology of septic and endotoxin shock. Interventions with endothelin receptor antagonists during septic and endotoxin shock have so far only been done in animal studies but the results are interesting and promising.

Effects of Ro 47-0203 and PD155080 on the plasma kinetics, receptor binding and vascular effects of endothelin in the pig.

The effects of the mixed endothelin ET(A)/endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist Ro 47-0203 (bosentan, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-( 2-methoxy -phenoxy)-2,2'-bipyrimidin-4-yl] -benzenesulfonamide) and the selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist PD155080 (sodium 2-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-3-benzyl-4-(4-me thoxy-phenyl)-4-oxobut+ ++-2-enoate) on plasma half-life and regional extraction of exogenous endothelin-1 as well as on the regional vascular effects of endothelin-1 were investigated in the pig in vivo. Bosentan but not PD155080 (5 mg/kg, i.v. bolus, both drugs) increased the arterial plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity. Neither of the drugs affected the plasma half-life of infused endothelin-1. In the spleen, both the extraction and vascular effects of exogenous endothelin-1 were attenuated by both bosentan and PD155080 whereas renal extraction and vascular effects in the kidney were unaffected by both drugs. In the lung, only bosentan decreased pulmonary extraction of endothelin-1. In conclusion, the bosentan-induced increase of circulating endothelin-1 seems to be related to blockade of endothelin-1 binding to endothelin ET(B) receptors. Blockade of these receptors does not influence the overall elimination of endothelin-1, however.

Effects on haemodynamics by selective endothelin ET(B) receptor and combined endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonism during endotoxin shock.

The endothelin system is highly activated during endotoxin and septic shock. To investigate this matter the selective non-peptide endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist A-192621 ([2R-(2alpha,3beta, 4alpha)]-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-[2-[2, 6-diethylphenyl)amino]-2-oxoethyl]-2-(4-propoxy-phenyl)-3-py rrolidine carboxylic acid) was administered alone and in combination with the selective non-peptide endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist PD 155080 (sodium 2-benzo[1, 3]dioxol-5-yl-3-benzyl-4-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-4-oxobut-2-enoat e) during established porcine endotoxin shock. Cardiopulmonary vascular function, metabolic parameters and plasma endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity levels were compared to a control group only receiving endotoxin. Administration of A-192621 alone resulted in cardiovascular collapse and death whereas combining A-192621 with PD 155080 abolished endotoxin induced pulmonary hypertension, enhanced cardiac performance and improved systemic oxygen delivery and acid-base balance. The beneficial effects of mixed endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonisms on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems may result from blockage of constrictive endothelin receptors in and pulmonary circulation, reduced afterload and a direct inotropic effect. Possible mechanisms for the devastating effects by selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism include increased endothelin ET(A) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction due to lack of endothelin ET(B) receptormediated vasodilation and decreased endothelin clearance from endothelin ET(B) receptor blockade. In conclusion, selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism is deleterious whereas combined endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism has favourable effects on haemodynamics, suggesting participation of the endothelin system in cardiopulmonary dysfunction during endotoxin shock.

Cardiac effects of endothelin receptor antagonism in endotoxemic pigs.

Myocardial depression in sepsis is frequently encountered clinically and contributes to morbidity and mortality. Increased plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) have been described in septic shock, and previous reports have shown beneficial effects on cardiovascular performance and survival in septic models using ET receptor antagonists. The aim of the current study was to investigate specific cardiac effects of ET receptor antagonism in endotoxicosis. Sixteen domestic pigs were anesthetized and subjected to endotoxin for 5 h. Eight of these pigs were given tezosentan (dual ET receptor antagonist) after 3 h. Cardiac effects were evaluated using the left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume relationship. Endotoxin was not associated with any effects on parameters of LV contractile function [end-systolic elastance (Ees), preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW), power(max)/end-diastolic volume (PWR(max)/EDV) and dP/dt(max)/end-diastolic volume (dP/dt(max)/EDV)] but with impairments in isovolumic relaxation (time constant for pressure decay, tau) and mechanical efficiency. Tezosentan administration decreased Ees, PWR(max)/EDV, and dP/dt(max)/EDV, while improving tau and LV stiffness. Thus, dual ET receptor antagonism was associated with a decline in contractile function but, in contrast, improved diastolic function. Positive hemodynamic effects from ET receptor antagonism in acute endotoxemia may be due to changes in cardiac load and enhanced diastolic function rather than improved contractile function.

Positive inotropic and negative lusitropic effects of endothelin receptor agonism in vivo.

The endothelin (ET) system is involved in the regulation of myocardial function in health as well as in several diseases, such as congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and septic myocardial depression. Conflicting results have been reported regarding the acute contractile properties of ET-1. We therefore investigated the effects of intracoronary infusions of ET-1 and of the selective ET(B) receptor-selective agonist sarafotoxin 6c with increasing doses in anesthetized pigs. Myocardial effects were measured through analysis of the left ventricular pressure-volume relationship. ET-1 elicited increases in the myocardial contractile status (end-systolic elastance value of 0.94 +/- 0.11 to 1.48 +/- 0.23 and preload recruitable stroke work value of 68.7 +/- 4.7 to 83.4 +/- 7.2) that appear to be mediated through ET(A) receptors, whereas impairment in left ventricular isovolumic relaxation (tau = 41.5 +/- 1.4 to 58.1 +/- 5.0 and t(1/2) = 23.0 +/- 0.7 to 30.9 +/- 2.6, where tau is the time constant for pressure decay and t(1/2) is the half-time for pressure decay) was ET(B) receptor dependent. In addition, intravenous administration of ET-1 impaired ventricular relaxation but had no effect on contractility. Intracoronary sarafotoxin 6c administration caused impairments in left ventricular relaxation (tau from 43.3 +/- 1.8 to 54.4 +/- 3.4) as well as coronary vasoconstriction. In conclusion, ET-1 elicits positive inotropic and negative lusitropic myocardial effects in a pig model, possibly resulting from ET(A) and ET(B) receptor activation, respectively.

Mechanical ventilation in medical and neurological diseases: 11 years of experience.

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is imperative in many forms of acute respiratory failure (ARF). The aim of this work was to review all episodes of MV in a Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) during the 11-year period 1976-1986. Four per cent (n = 1008) of 24,899 admissions to the MICU were treated with MV. The mean age of ventilator-treated patients was 53 +/- 18 years, and obviously it increased during the period of study. The average duration of MV was 4.7 d. MICU mortality, hospital mortality and 2-year mortality rates for patients subjected to MV were 33%, 38% and 46%, respectively. The mortality rate did not change during the study period. Cerebrovascular and malignant diseases carried the highest mortality rates, 75 and 79%, respectively, whereas mortality in patients ventilated because of drug overdose (n = 313) was only 2%. The results of this study confirm previously published findings concerning the outcome of MV, and we conclude that the effects of MV remain discouraging in medical and neurological patients. Improved quality of ventilator therapy and monitoring, as well as continued research directed at the causes of ARF, are equally important in reducing the mortality in ARF.

Effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan on cardiac performance during porcine endotoxin shock.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac dysfunction during septic shock is well described but the underlying mechanisms still remain to be resolved. This study was conducted to elucidate the involvement of endothelin in cardiac function during endotoxin shock by the use of endothelin receptor antagonism. METHODS: Anaesthetised and haemodynamically stable landrace pigs received the nonpeptide mixed endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, two hours after onset of endotoxaemia (n=7). Cardiopulmonary vascular changes, including cardiac index, stroke work index, coronary artery blood flow, rate of change of left ventricular pressure (dp/dt), and arterial and coronary sinus plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity were compared to a control group only receiving endotoxin (n=7). RESULTS: Plasma endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity increased threefold in the control group. Bosentan effectively counteracted the endotoxin induced decrease in cardiac index. This was accompanied by a significant reduction of both right and left ventricular afterload. In addition, coronary artery blood flow increased and coronary vascular resistance decreased compared to controls. Dp/dt remained unaffected by endothelin receptor antagonism. A further increase in plasma endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity was seen in response to bosentan. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the increased endothelin production during endotoxaemia contributes to a depressed cardiac performance and that endothelin receptor antagonism may counteract this development. Possible mechanisms for the improved cardiac performance include both a reduction of afterload and enhanced coronary blood flow.

The endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, in combination with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac, counteracts pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock.

OBJECTIVE: To prevent endotoxin-induced pulmonary hypertension in the pig with a combination of a nonpeptide mixed endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, and a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled trial. SETTING: Animal laboratory at a large university medical center. SUBJECTS: Twelve domestic pigs, weighing 17.5 to 27 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Endotoxin shock was induced by intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (15 micrograms/kg/hr). Six pigs receiving only endotoxin served as controls. Six pigs were pretreated with intravenous bolus injections of bosentan (5 mg/kg) and diclofenac (3 mg/kg) followed by a continuous bosentan infusion (2.5 mg/kg/hr). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Systemic hemodynamics and regional circulation were measured using ultrasonic flow probes. Arterial and mixed venous blood samples were collected regularty for determination of Big endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity, endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity, norepinephrine, and blood gases. The bosentan/diclofenac pretreatment per se significantly decreased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p < .001), pulmonary vascular resistance index (p < .001), and mean arterial blood pressure (p < .001), but cardiac index did not change. Splenic blood flow increased (p < .01) while renal blood flow decreased (p < .001). In addition, intestinal blood flow decreased slightly (p < .05). In the control group, only three animals survived the 3 hrs of endotoxin infusion, while all pretreated animals survived. The biphasic increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance index seen in control animals during endotoxemia was markedly attenuated in animals pretreated with the bosentan/diclofenac combination. The pretreated group generally showed a favorable hemodynamic course, with a relatively higher cardiac index, stroke volume index, and splenic and renal blood flow. In control animals, a pronounced metabolic acidosis developed during endotoxin infusion. A relatively higher arterial plasma concentration of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity was reached in pretreated animals, while the Big endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity plasma increase was similar in both groups. Arterial concentrations of norepinephrine were significantly (p < .01) higher in control animals when compared with diclofenac/bosentan-treated animals. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bosentan and diclofenac induced systemic and pulmonary vasodilation in the intrinsic state. During endotoxin shock, this drug combination efficiently counteracts pulmonary hypertension and improves cardiac performance and splenic and renal blood flow. These favorable circulatory effects may have resulted in a reduction of both sympathetic nervous system activation and metabolic acidosis. Thus, we conclude that the endothelin receptors participate in intrinsic regulation of vascular tone in the anesthetized pig. During endotoxin shock, blockade of these receptors, as well as inhibition of the cyclooxygenase enzymes, contributes to a less adverse effect on the systemic and pulmonary circulation.

Effects of levosimendan, a novel inotropic calcium-sensitizing drug, in experimental septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Levosimendan is a novel inodilator that improves cardiac contractility by sensitizing troponin C to calcium. This drug has proved to be effective in treating advanced congestive heart failure but has not been evaluated in septic settings. The purpose of the present study was to study the effects of this drug in a porcine model of endotoxemia. DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. SUBJECTS: Fourteen landrace pigs. INTERVENTIONS: All animals were anesthetized and catheterized for measurement of central and pulmonary hemodynamics. Ultrasonic flow probes were placed around the renal artery and portal vein to measure blood flow. A tonometer was placed in the ileum to measure mucosal pH. Levosimendan was given to six animals as a bolus (200 microg x kg(-1)) followed by a continuous infusion (200 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1)). Thirty minutes after onset of levosimendan treatment, all animals received endotoxin (20 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1) for 3 hrs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At baseline, levosimendan induced a systemic vasodilation with a reduction in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate. A tendency to an increase in cardiac index did not reach statistical significance (p =.055). Cardiac index and systemic oxygen delivery were markedly improved in the levosimendan group during endotoxemia. Systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure were reduced in the levosimendan group. The latter parameter, however, was only different from the control group during the initial phase of endotoxin shock but not at the late, most pronounced phase of shock. Levosimendan also efficiently attenuated endotoxin-induced pulmonary hypertension. Portal venous blood flow and gut oxygen delivery were improved, but no concomitant reduction in endotoxin-induced intestinal mucosal acidosis was observed. Renal blood flow was unaffected, as was the endotoxin-induced increase in plasma endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity. These findings support previous reports of calcium desensitization as a potential component in septic myocardial depression. Furthermore, the vasodilatory properties of this drug were well tolerated in the current model of hypodynamic endotoxin shock, and they may have contributed to improved regional blood flow as seen in the gut as well as improved systemic perfusion by means of reduced biventricular afterload. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with levosimendan in pigs subjected to endotoxin shock improved cardiac output and systemic and gut oxygen delivery. In addition, pulmonary hypertension largely was attenuated without any adverse effects on gas exchange. These results are promising in several aspects, but the role of levosimendan in the treating circulatory failure in sepsis remains to be established.

The endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan restores gut oxygen delivery and reverses intestinal mucosal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1, the most potent vasoconstrictor known, is produced in septic states and may be involved in the pathophysiology of the deteriorated splanchnic circulation seen in septic shock. AIMS: To elucidate the capability of bosentan, a non-peptide mixed endothelin receptor antagonist, to attenuate splanchnic blood flow disturbances and counteract intestinal mucosal acidosis in endotoxic shock. METHODS: In 16 anaesthetised pigs, central and regional haemodynamics were monitored by thermodilution and ultrasonic flow probes, respectively. A tonometer in the ileum was used for measurement of mucosal pH. Onset of endotoxin challenge was followed by bosentan administration (to eight pigs) two hours later. RESULTS: Endotoxin infusion reduced cardiac index and systemic oxygen delivery; bosentan restored these parameters. The reduced mean arterial blood pressure and renal blood flow remained unaffected by bosentan. The profound reduction in gut oxygen delivery in response to endotoxin was completely abolished by bosentan. Bosentan significantly improved the notably deteriorated intestinal mucosal pH and mucosal-arterial PCO2 gap. The mucosal-portal vein PCO2 gap, used to monitor the mucosa in relation to the gut as a whole (including the spleen and pancreas), was also greatly increased by endotoxaemia and significantly reversed by bosentan. CONCLUSION: Bosentan completely restored the profound endotoxin induced reductions in systemic and gut oxygen delivery with a concomitant reversal of intestinal mucosal acidosis. Results suggest that endothelin is involved in the pronounced perfusion disturbances seen in the gut in endotoxic shock. Bosentan may prove useful in reducing gut ischaemia in septic shock.

Endothelin(A)-receptor antagonism attenuates pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock.

Porcine endotoxin shock is characterized by pulmonary hypertension, decreased mean arterial pressure and deteriorated cardiac performance. These pathophysiological findings are accompanied by increased plasma endothelin-1 levels. Previous studies have shown that both the pulmonary and systemic circulation are improved by combined endothelinA- and endothelinB-receptor antagonism. This study was designed to evaluate further the specific involvement of the endothelinA-receptor in cardiopulmonary pathophysiology during endotoxin shock. In a porcine endotoxin shock model, the endothelinA-receptor antagonist PD 155080 was administered after the onset of endotoxaemia. Cardiopulmonary vascular changes, dynamic lung compliance, oxygen-related variables and plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity were compared with a control group receiving only endotoxin. PD 155080 counteracted the increase in pulmonary artery pressure seen in control animals. In contrast, cardiac performance was not improved. Dynamic lung compliance was not affected by PD 155080. Plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity increased to a similar degree in both groups. These findings indicate that the endothelin system is involved in the pathophysiology of endotoxin shock. Furthermore, the change in pulmonary circulation seen in the present shock model is to a large extent mediated by the endothelinA-receptor mechanism. In view of previous findings, the deterioration of cardiac performance may involve the endothelinB-receptor, either alone or in combination with the endothelinA-receptor.