Early Pregnancy Hemoglobin A1C and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: Women with prediabetes are identified from screening for overt diabetes in early pregnancy, but the clinical significance of prediabetes in pregnancy is unclear. We examined whether prediabetes in early pregnancy was associated with risks of adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington from 2011 to 2014. Early pregnancy hemoglobin A1C (A1C) values, covariates, and outcomes were ascertained from electronic medical records and state birth certificates. Women with prediabetes (A1C of 5.7-6.4%) were compared with those with normal A1C levels (<5.7%) for risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and other outcomes including preeclampsia, primary cesarean delivery, induction of labor, large/small for gestational age, preterm birth, and macrosomia. We used modified Poisson's regression to calculate adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 7,020 women, 239 (3.4%) had prediabetes. GDM developed in 48% of prediabetic women compared with 11% of women with normal A1C levels (adjusted RR: 2.8, 95% CI: 2.4-3.3). Prediabetes was not associated with all other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Prediabetes in early pregnancy is a risk factor for GDM. Future research is needed to elucidate whether early intervention may reduce this risk.

One-Step Approach to Identifying Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Association With Perinatal Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes before and after a clinical guideline change from a two-step to a one-step approach to screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: We conducted a before-after cohort study of women with singleton live birth deliveries within Kaiser Permanente Washington, a mixed-model health plan in Washington state. We used Kaiser Permanente Washington electronic health data and linked birth certificates. We compared outcomes before (January 2009-March 2011) and after (April 2012-December 2014) the guideline change among women who received prenatal care from health care providers internal to Kaiser Permanente Washington (n=4,977 before, n=6,337 after). We made the same comparison among women who received prenatal care from external health care providers (not exposed to the guideline change; n=3,386 before, n=4,454 after) to control for time trends unrelated to the guideline change. Adjusted relative risks and 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: After the guideline change, receipt of the one-step approach became widespread among women cared for by Kaiser Permanente Washington internal providers (87%), and use of insulin increased 3.7-fold from 1.2% to 4.4%. Among women cared for by Kaiser Permanente Washington internal providers, GDM increased from 6.9% to 11.4%, induction of labor from 25.2% to 28.6%, neonatal hypoglycemia from 1.3% to 2.0%, and outpatient nonstress testing from 134.6 to 157.0 test days per 100 women. After accounting for background trends in outcomes (based on the women cared for by external providers), the guideline change was associated with increased incidence of GDM (relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69), labor induction (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.14-2.75), and nonstress testing (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.24% per 100 women). There was no association with other outcomes including cesarean delivery or macrosomia. CONCLUSION: Adopting the one-step approach was associated with a 41% increase in the diagnosis of GDM without improved maternal or neonatal outcomes.

A northwest collaborative practice model.

Collaborative practice between obstetrician-gynecologists and certified nurse-midwives has been successful at the Family Beginnings obstetric unit at Group Health for at least three reasons. Each provider group is able to practice independently and thus give the kind of maternity and women's health care sought by the local community. The legal framework in Washington State supports a wide range of maternity care practices and includes a reasonable provider insurance scheme. The boundaries between different groups operating within distinct scopes of practice are well-defined and communicated. This allows providers to smoothly share or transfer clients from midwife to obstetrician and back as needed in each case. The success of the Family Beginnings model is demonstrated by a favorable comparison with national and Washington State metrics of delivery outcomes. Replicating the model elsewhere depends on building support for collaborative maternity care across the obstetric and midwifery professions in states where an appropriate legal framework exists, and in institutions where policies for credentialing nurse midwives are in place. Where these supports do not exist, all practitioners jointly advocating for more enlightened approaches is recommended.