ABSTRACT
Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease represents a severe phenotype associated with significant morbidity. Patients with perianal fistulizing disease are more likely to have a severe disease course and have significant reductions in quality of life. Moreover, these patients are at risk for the development of distal rectal and anal cancers. Given the complexity and severity of this patient group, the management of perianal Crohn's disease must be undertaken by a multidisciplinary team. The gastroenterologist and colorectal surgeon play a critical role in the diagnosis and management of perianal fistulizing disease. An examination under anesthesia provides critical information and is an essential part of the work-up of complex perianal fistulas. The radiologist also plays a central role in characterizing anatomy and assessing response to treatment. Several imaging modalities are available for these patients with magnetic resonance imaging as the imaging modality of choice. Perianal disease developing after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis represents a particularly challenging form of fistulizing disease and requires a multidisciplinary clinical and radiologic approach to differentiate surgical complications from recurrent Crohn's disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- vs multiple-strain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS Previews, and Google Scholar through January 1, 2019, for studies of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on the outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates. We used a frequentist approach for network meta-analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (Bell stage II or more), and culture-proven sepsis. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 63 trials involving 15,712 preterm infants. Compared with placebo, a combination of 1 or more Lactobacillus species (spp) and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp was the only intervention with moderate- or high-quality evidence of reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.80). Among interventions with moderate- or high-quality evidence for efficacy compared with placebo, combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp, Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis, Lactobacillus reuteri, or Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced severe NEC (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.59]; OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.74]; OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.91]; and OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.90], respectively). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Saccharomyces boulardii reduced the number of days to reach full feeding (mean reduction of 3.30 days [95% CI, reduction of 5.91-0.69 days]). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that, compared with placebo, the single-species product B animalis subsp lactis or L reuteri significantly reduced duration of hospitalization (mean reduction of 13.00 days [95% CI, reduction of 22.71-3.29 days] and mean reduction of 7.89 days [95% CI, reduction of 11.60-4.17 days], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies to determine the effects of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates, we found moderate to high evidence for the superiority of combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp vs single- and other multiple-strain probiotic treatments. The combinations of Bacillus spp and Enterococcus spp, and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Streptococcus salivarius subsp thermophilus, might produce the largest reduction in NEC development. Further trials are needed.
Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Infant Mortality , Neonatal Sepsis/epidemiology , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/microbiology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/physiopathology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant, Low Birth Weight/physiology , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/physiology , Neonatal Sepsis/microbiology , Neonatal Sepsis/physiopathology , Neonatal Sepsis/prevention & control , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: De-escalation of biologic therapy is a commonly encountered clinical scenario. Although biologic discontinuation has been associated with high rates of relapse, the effectiveness of dose de-escalation is unclear. This review was performed to determine the effectiveness of dose de-escalation of biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to October 2019. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving dose de-escalation of biologic therapy in adults with inflammatory bowel disease in remission were included. Studies involving biologic discontinuation only and those lacking outcomes after dose de-escalation were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: We identified 1,537 unique citations with 20 eligible studies after full-text review. A total of 995 patients were included from 18 observational studies (4 prospective and 14 retrospective), 1 nonrandomized controlled trial, and 1 subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Seven studies included patients with Crohn's disease, 1 included patients with ulcerative colitis, and 12 included both. Overall, clinical relapse occurred in 0%-54% of patients who dose de-escalated biologic therapy (17 studies). The 1-year rate of clinical relapse ranged from 7% to 50% (6 studies). Eighteen studies were considered at high risk of bias, mostly because of the lack of a control group. DISCUSSION: Dose de-escalation seems to be associated with high rates of clinical relapse; however, the quality of the evidence was very low. Additional controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of biologic de-escalation and identify predictors of success.
Subject(s)
Biological Products/administration & dosage , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Drug Tapering , Gastrointestinal Agents/administration & dosage , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adalimumab/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Colitis, Ulcerative/physiopathology , Crohn Disease/physiopathology , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/physiopathology , Infliximab/administration & dosage , RecurrenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Vedolizumab (VDZ) blocks α4ß7 integrin and is licenced for the treatment of IBD. It has been associated with mild SpA-related features, including sacroiliitis and synovitis. Herein we report a series of cases demonstrating the emergence of severe SpA-associated enthesitis/osteitis following successful IBD therapy with VDZ. METHODS: We evaluated 11 VDZ-treated patients with IBD across seven centres who developed severe active SpA and/or enthesopathy, with the aim of characterizing the VDZ-associated SpA or entheseal flares. Imaging features demonstrating particularly severe disease were recorded. RESULTS: De novo SpA developed in 9 of 11 patients and flare of known SpA in 2 patients, with 4 patients requiring hospitalization due to disease severity. Available data showed that one of seven cases were HLA-B27 positive. The median time from VDZ initiation to flare was 12 weeks, with IBD well controlled in 7 of 10 patients (no data for 1 patient) at flare. Severe SpA enthesitis/osteitis was evident on MRI or US, including acute sacroiliitis (n = 5), extensive vertebral osteitis (n = 1), peri-facetal oedema (n = 1) and isolated peripheral enthesitis (n = 3). Due to arthritis severity, VDZ was discontinued in 9 of 11 patients and a change in therapy, including alternative anti-TNF, was initiated. CONCLUSION: Severe SpA, predominantly HLA-B27 negative, with osteitis/enthesitis may occur under successful VDZ treatment for IBD, including in subjects with prior anti-TNF therapy for intestinal disease.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Enthesopathy/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Spondylarthropathies/chemically induced , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteitis/chemically induced , Sacroiliitis/chemically induced , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Paradoxical development of psoriasis in patients on anti-TNF agents has been increasingly reported. AIM: The aim was to characterize the prevalence and clinical characteristics of anti-TNF-associated psoriasis in a large cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients. METHODS: Medical records of patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis treated with anti-TNF therapy at a single, tertiary IBD center were identified between 2004 and 2016. Patients identified as having developed psoriasis while on anti-TNF underwent detailed retrospective review of dermatologic features and changes in IBD treatment prompted by the development of psoriasis. RESULTS: Among 676 patients treated with anti-TNF (infliximab or adalimumab), the incidence of psoriasis was 10.7% (N = 72). Female gender (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.12-3.17], p = 0.017), stricturing or fistulizing Crohn's disease (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.04-3.21], p = 0.036) and upper GI Crohn's disease (OR 3.03 [95% CI 1.06-8.33], p = 0.039) were associated with psoriasis development. The median time to psoriasis onset was 569 days from initiation of anti-TNF, with onset occurring earlier in patients who developed psoriasis on adalimumab versus infliximab (457 vs. 790.5 days, p = 0.008). Overall, in 15/72 (20.8%), cases, cessation of the anti-TNF was required as a result of psoriasis. Plaque psoriasis was the most common type of psoriatic lesion (75%). Topical corticosteroids were the most common treatment for psoriasis. CONCLUSION: We report a high incidence of anti-TNF-associated psoriasis that was associated with female gender, foregut disease location, and fistulizing and stricturing disease behavior. More prospective studies and genetic analyses evaluating possible pathophysiologic underpinnings of this problem are needed.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab/adverse effects , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Infliximab/adverse effects , Psoriasis/chemically induced , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Cohort Studies , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Female , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolismSubject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Gastroenterology/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Consensus , Dysbiosis , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Gastroenterology/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Consensus , Dysbiosis , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Gastroenterology/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Consensus , Dysbiosis , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed considerably over the past two decades, owing to the development and widespread penetration of targeted therapies, including biologics and small molecules. While some conventional treatments continue to have an important role in the management of IBD, treatment of IBD is increasingly moving towards targeted therapies given their greater efficacy and safety in comparison to conventional agents. Early introduction of these therapies-particularly in persons with Crohn's disease-combining targeted therapies with traditional anti-metabolite immunomodulators and targeting objective markers of disease activity (in addition to symptoms), have been shown to improve health outcomes and will be increasingly adopted over time. The substantially increased costs associated with targeted therapies has led to a ballooning of healthcare expenditure to treat IBD over the past 15 years. The introduction of less expensive biosimilar anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies may bend this cost curve downwards, potentially allowing for more widespread access to these medications. Newer therapies targeting different inflammatory pathways and complementary and alternative therapies (including novel diets) will continue to shape the IBD treatment landscape. More precise use of a growing number of targeted therapies in the right individuals at the right time will help minimize the development of expensive and disabling complications, which has the potential to further reduce costs and improve outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a heterogeneous disease that can be challenging to diagnose and manage. As a result, significant efforts have been made in attempting to identify clinical, genomic, and serologic markers of disease that can aid in patient assessment and treatment. Recent genomic discoveries have the potential to change clinical practice by identifying those susceptible to IBD, predict natural history and guide choice of therapy. Panels of genetic and genomic markers are more likely to emerge as clinical tools, as opposed to individual allelic variants. Serology and biomarkers are already being used and guiding management but await integration with genomic panels before achieving their maximal potential. This article reviews the current state of IBD genetics and evolving molecular approaches that may have potential clinical impact.
Subject(s)
Genomics , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/genetics , Genetic Markers , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/classification , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
Diverticular disease of the colon is among the most prevalent conditions in western society and is among the leading reasons for outpatient visits and causes of hospitalization. While previously considered to be a disease primarily affecting the elderly, there is increasing incidence among individuals younger than 40 years of age. Diverticular disease most frequently presents as uncomplicated diverticulitis, and the cornerstone of management is antibiotic therapy and bowel rest. Segmental colitis associated with diverticula shares common histopathological features with inflammatory bowel disease and may benefit from treatment with 5-aminosalicylates. Surgical management may be required for patients with recurrent diverticulitis or one of its complications including peridiverticular abscess, perforation, fistulizing disease, and strictures and / or obstruction.
Subject(s)
Diverticulosis, Colonic/epidemiology , Diverticulosis, Colonic/therapy , Age Factors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diagnosis , Diverticulitis, Colonic/drug therapy , Diverticulitis, Colonic/epidemiology , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Diverticulosis, Colonic/diagnosis , Diverticulosis, Colonic/drug therapy , Diverticulosis, Colonic/surgery , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Recurrence , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), though risk factors remain to be determined. AIM: To characterize HS among a cohort of IBD patients and identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study at the ambulatory IBD centre at Mount Sinai Hospital from inception to May 2019. Patients with IBD who developed HS were included. Cases were matched 5:1 by age, gender (male versus female) and IBD type (ulcerative colitis [UC] or Crohn's disease [CD]) to controls who had IBD without HS. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-nine cases of HS (19 CD and 10 UC) and 145 controls were included. Of the 29 patients with HS, 11 (37.9%) were male and 18 (62.1%) were female. The severity of HS was mild in 10 (34.5%), moderate in 16 (55.2%) and severe in 3 (10.3%) patients. Patients with HS and IBD were more likely to be active (OR 10.3, 95% CI 2.0 to 54.0, P = 0.006) or past (OR 8.4, 95% CI 2.7 to 25.8, P < 0.005) smokers. Patients with HS and IBD were also more likely to have active endoscopic disease (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 12.2, P = 0.022). Furthermore, those with HS and CD were more likely to have active perianal disease (OR 21.1, 95% CI 6.2 to 71.9, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Active IBD, perianal disease and smoking may be associated with HS in IBD. Larger studies are needed to better characterize this morbid condition.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Variation in care has been demonstrated among hospitalized patients with ulcerative colitis. Guidelines aim to reduce variation; however, it is known that the uptake of guidelines by physicians is variable. Providing patients with guidelines is a strategy that has not been extensively studied in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a patient-directed educational intervention that included treatment guidelines among hospitalized ulcerative colitis patients. METHODS: We performed a quality improvement, cluster-randomized trial at seven tertiary IBD centres. Sites were randomized to implement an educational intervention or standard care for a 6-month period between January 2017 and January 2018. The educational intervention consisted of a patient-directed video that provided a summary of inpatient management guidelines for ulcerative colitis. Primary outcome measures included the length of stay and colectomy at discharge and 6 months. Patient-reported outcomes included trust in physician and patient satisfaction at discharge and at 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled. No statistically significant differences in length of stay or colectomy were noted. Patients who received the intervention had higher trust in physician as measured by Trust in Physician Score at discharge (69.5 vs. 62.6, P = 0.028) and at 6 months (77.7 vs. 68, P = 0.008). Patient satisfaction as measured by the CACHE questionnaire in the intervention group was higher at discharge (72.8 vs. 67.1, P = 0.04); however, this difference was not sustained. CONCLUSION: Empowering patients with guidelines through an educational intervention resulted in differences in trust in physician and patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed for evaluating a strategy of engaging IBD patients to take a more active role in their care. (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02569333).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) ultimately fail anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. We aimed to investigate early predictive markers of clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with UC who were anti-TNF-naïve commencing anti-TNF treatment, with particular focus on changes in albumin and C-reactive protein levels in the first 2 weeks of treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 210 patients with UC who started infliximab or adalimumab between 2009 and 2016 (male, 62.4%; median age at diagnosis, 37.9 years [interquartile range, 25.5-48.9 years]; median follow-up duration, 3.3 years [1.9-5.0 years]). Logistic and Cox proportional-hazards regressions were performed to identify variables associated with primary nonresponse (PNR), endoscopic outcomes, time-to-colectomy, and anti-TNF failure. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (19.5%) experienced PNR; week 0/week 2 ratio serum albumin was associated with PNR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.9, per interquartile range increase). Week 0/week 2 ratio albumin was also associated with endoscopic response (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82) and endoscopic remission (aOR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96) at weeks 8 to 14, time-to-colectomy (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.29-3.49) and time-to-anti-TNF failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.96), regardless of age, disease severity, or in-patient status. Association with time-to-colectomy and anti-TNF failure was externally validated in an independent cohort of inpatients with UC starting infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Change in serum albumin within the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment is predictive of PNR, endoscopic outcomes, time-to-colectomy, and anti-TNF failure in patients with UC. Timely access to this biomarker enables early identification of patients with UC at risk of anti-TNF failure and may guide early optimization of anti-TNF treatment to improve disease outcomes.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Serum Albumin, Human/analysis , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody which inhibits leukocyte vascular adhesion and migration into the gastrointestinal tract through α4ß7 integrin blockade. AIMS: We retrospectively assessed the 12-month, real-world efficacy and safety of VDZ as induction and maintenance therapy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: The rates of clinical remission (CR, partial Mayo score < 2), steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), and mucosal healing were assessed with nonresponder imputation analysis. Baseline independent predictors of clinical remission were investigated, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: We analyzed outcomes in 74 patients; 32% were anti-TNF naïve, 68% had pancolitis, and 46% were on systemic steroids at baseline. At week six, week 14, six months and one year, the CR rates were 26%, 34%, 39% and 39% respectively, and the SFCR rates were 24%, 31%, 38% and 39%, respectively. Among patients not in CR after induction, the probability of remission at six months was 20%. Sustained SFCR between weeks 14 and 52 and between weeks 22 and 52 was found in 69% and 86% of the patients, respectively. Steroid-free clinical remission at 12 months was significantly associated with remission after the induction phase (OR = 30.4; 95% CI, 6 to 150; P < 0.001). Mucosal healing rate at one year was 39%. The most common side effect was headache (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing remission rates were observed over the first six months of VDZ treatment. One-fifth of patients not in remission post-induction achieved remission by six months of continued therapy. Mucosal healing was associated with higher rates of one-year steroid-free remission and VDZ treatment continuation.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Golimumab is approved as a therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Recent data also demonstrate efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD); however, little is known about target drug levels to achieve endoscopic remission. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of IBD patients on maintenance golimumab. Median trough levels were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression was used to construct a probabilistic model to determine sensitivity and specificity of levels predicting mucosal healing. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients on maintenance golimumab were included (n = 39 CD, n = 19 UC/IBD-unclassified [IBDU]). Forty percent (n = 23) were cotreated with an immunomodulator, 95% (n = 55) of patients were anti-TNF experienced, and 15.5% (n = 9) had 3 or more prior biologic therapies. Forty-four percent of patients achieved mucosal healing with endoscopic response in a further 26% of patients. Clinical remission was recorded in 41% of patients, and 82% had clinical response. Patients were treated with doses generally higher than the approved maintenance dose. In CD patients, median golimumab trough levels were higher in patients with mucosal healing (8.8 µg/mL vs 5.08 µg/mL, P = 0.03). After calculation of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for mucosal healing vs nonresponse, a trough level >8 µg/mL was associated with mucosal healing, with 67% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and a likelihood ratio of 3:4. CONCLUSION: Treatment with golimumab was associated with mucosal healing in 44% of all IBD patients. Higher golimumab levels were associated with mucosal healing in CD. These findings support the need for prospective studies to determine target golimumab levels in IBD, which may impact current clinical practices in relation to selection of maintenance dosing.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/blood , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Colitis, Ulcerative/blood , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Crohn Disease/blood , Crohn Disease/pathology , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Logistic Models , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a web-based self-assessment quality improvement tool used to identify gaps in health care, change the focus to patient-centred care and standardize care. There are four levels of achievement ranging from basic-(D) to excellent-(A) service delivery. The goal was to develop a GRS for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to improve the quality of care for patients on a system level. METHODS: The IBD GRS was developed through an iterative process and modeled upon the successful endoscopy GRS programs in the United Kingdom and Canada. Dimensions, items and statements were drafted based on expert opinions, patient-informed quality indicators and best available evidence, then reviewed and modified by a core committee. A working group of IBD and GRS experts voted in-person to establish consensus on the inclusion and quality of statements. RESULTS: Two dimensions (Clinical Quality and Quality of Patient Experience), 10 items and 89 statements made up the IBD GRS. There was a 100% response rate for each of the 40 votes for statements in the IBD GRS. All statements within each level received a mean rating score between four (agree) and five (strongly agree). Revisions agreed upon during the voting process were incorporated into the IBD GRS. Group consensus was achieved on the inclusion of statements, and 10 items were selected as standards within the two dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed the first IBD GRS with the aim of improving quality of care through ongoing evaluations and improvements by health care teams, focusing on patient-centred care.