Subjective outcomes 12 years after transvaginal mesh versus native tissue repair in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse; a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The present study describes an extended follow-up study after 12 years and focusses on subjective outcomes of women who underwent surgery for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse in the randomized index study. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-four (194) women had been randomized in the original study and in the present study, 45 (47%) in the vaginal mesh repair versus 43 (43%) women with conventional vaginal native tissue repair completed the long-term questionnaires. The mesh used was a first-generation non-absorbable mesh kit. All types of conventional vaginal native tissue repairs were allowed, and additional vaginal native tissue repairs were allowed in the mesh group. The questionnaires as applied at baseline were used. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire (PGI-I) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: At 12 years, 30 (71%) women in the mesh group versus 23 (59%) women in the native tissue repair group reported to be PGI-I (very) much improved (p=0.24). There were no differences found in any of the questionnaire domains. There was, however, a higher number of women who had had additional operations for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, and/or exposure in the mesh group: 18 women (40%) in the mesh group versus 8 women (19%) in the native tissue repair group (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in subjective outcome between the groups, but there was a statistically significant higher number of women who had needed further operations. This study confirms that vaginal mesh should not be used in all women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse: parameters associated with specific reasons for failure.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess if specific reasons for unsuccessful pessary fitting have different predictive parameters. METHODS: This is a prospective observational case-control study of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) choosing pessary treatment. All women underwent an interview, clinical examination, and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Groups were defined based on fitting outcome: successful, pessary dislodgment, failure to relieve POP symptoms, pain/discomfort, increased/de novo urinary incontinence, or other reasons. Clinical, demographic, and TPUS parameters were assessed in the prediction of different reasons for unsuccessful fitting and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 162 women were assessed and 130 were included. Levator hiatal area (HA) on maximum Valsalva divided by ring pessary size ("Valsalva HARP ratio") was a predictor of unsuccessful fitting (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.15-7.81, p = 0.025) with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.74, p = 0.04). Predictors of pessary dislodgment were: complete avulsion (OR 24.20, 95% CI 2.46-237.84, p value 0.01) and Valsalva HARP ratio (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.32-6.55, p value 0.01) with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI 0.84-0.99, p = 0.00). No significant parameter was identified in the prediction of pain/discomfort. Solitary predominant posterior compartment POP was a predictor of failure to relieve POP symptoms (OR 20.00, 95% CI 3.48-115.02, p value 0.00; AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-0.98, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Complete avulsion and a small ring pessary with respect to the levator HA in Valsalva are predictors of pessary dislodgment, whereas solitary predominant posterior compartment POP is a predictor of failure to relieve POP symptoms.

Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify which parameters are associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) at up to 3 months follow-up. METHODS: Embase, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL library were searched in May 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (1) pessary fitting attempted in women with symptomatic POP; (2) pessary fitting success among the study outcomes with a maximal follow-up of 3 months; (3) baseline parameters compared between successful and unsuccessful group. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting were: age (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.86); BMI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08-1.70); menopause (OR 0.65 95% CI 0.47-0.88); de novo stress urinary incontinence (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.24-13.99); prior surgery, i.e. hysterectomy (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.48-2.40), POP surgery (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.34-3.38), pelvic surgery (OR 1.81, 05% CI 1.01-3.26) and incontinence surgery (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.08-3.25); Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8 scores (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.22-3.02); solitary predominant posterior compartment POP (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35); total vaginal length (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97); wide introitus (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.60-14.68); levator ani avulsion (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.35-4.53) and hiatal area on maximum Valsalva (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.27-2.80). CONCLUSION: During counselling for pessary treatment a higher risk of failure due to the aforementioned parameters should be discussed and modifiable parameters should be addressed. More research is needed on the association between anatomical parameters and specific reasons for unsuccessful pessary fitting.

Transperineal ultrasound to estimate the appropriate ring pessary size for women with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to predict the successful ring pessary size based on the levator hiatal area (HA). METHODS: This is a prospective case-control study. Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) choosing pessary treatment were included. All women underwent an interview, clinical examination, and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). The ring pessary size used in each trial and the reason for unsuccessful trials were recorded. In addition, levator hiatal area divided by ring pessary size (HARP ratio) was measured at rest, maximum contraction, and maximum Valsalva. The HARP ratios of successful and unsuccessful trials were compared, receiver operating characteristic curves in the prediction of successful trials were constructed, and the cut-off optimizing sensitivity and specificity was identified. RESULTS: A total of 162 women were assessed and 106 were included with 77 successful trials, 49 unsuccessful trials owing to dislodgment or failure to relieve POP symptoms, and 20 unsuccessful trials owing to pain/discomfort. Rest HARP ratio and Valsalva HARP ratio were significantly smaller in the successful trials versus dislodgment/failure to relieve POP symptoms trials (mean rest HARP ratio [SD]: 2.93 [0.59] vs 3.24 [0.67], p = 0.021; median Valsalva HARP ratio (IQR): 4.65 (1.56) vs 5.32 (2.08), p = 0.004). No significant difference was observed between pain/discomfort trials and successful trials. The best cut-off for the prediction of successful trials was Valsalva HARP ratio ≤ 5.00. CONCLUSIONS: Unsuccessful fitting trials due to dislodgment/failure to relieve POP symptoms are associated with a small ring pessary with respect to the levator HA. A ring pessary that produces a Valsalva HARP ratio > 5.00 has a higher risk of dislodgment/failure to relieve POP symptoms.

The effect of pessary treatment on puborectalis muscle function.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess if puborectalis muscle (PRM) function changes in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) undergoing pessary treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of women with symptomatic POP choosing pessary treatment. An interview, clinical examination and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound were performed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. POP was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POPQ). Parameters compared between baseline and follow-up were: hiatal area at rest (HArest), maximal contraction (HActx), and maximal Valsalva maneuver (HAVal), displacement in contraction (DISPL-ctx, i.e., relative difference between HArest and HActx), and displacement in Valsalva (DISPL-Val, i.e., relative difference between and HAVal and HArest). Parameters were compared in women with and those without complete avulsion. RESULTS: A total of 162 women were assessed and 34 were included. Mean age was 64 years (SD 11.4), and mean BMI 24 kg/m2 (SD 3.1). Thirty-one women had a cystocele, 8 a uterine prolapse, and 12 had a posterior compartment prolapse. Twenty-one women (61.8%) had a POP stage II, and 13 (38.2%) a POP stage III. Ring pessaries were most frequently used (97%). In the entire group a statistically significant increase in DISPL-ctx was observed (mean difference 2.1%, p = 0.017). In the no avulsion group HArest and DISPL-ctx increased significantly (mean difference 4.1%, p = 0.016 and 2.7%, p = 0.016 respectively) and the increase in DISPL-ctx was higher than in the avulsion group (mean difference 2.7% vs 0.2%, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Our results show that PRM function changes in women with POP undergoing pessary treatment and suggest that such change occurs mainly in the absence of complete avulsion.

Pulsed Radiofrequency of Pudendal Nerve for Treatment in Patients with Pudendal Neuralgia. A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is an impairing neuropathic disorder, affecting both men and women, involving a severe burning and sharp pain along the course of the pudendal nerve. Treatment is often insufficient, and options are limited. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a technique which might be useful in therapy. This case series aims to determine the effectiveness of PRF in patients with PN in the context of evaluation of care. Between 2010 and 2016, all female patients of University Medical Center Utrecht diagnosed with PN who experience insufficient pain relief after common treatment were offered PRF. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scores were assessed at 3-month follow-up and at long-term follow-up (median 4 years). PGI-I scores were recorded to evaluate our quality of care. Twenty patients with PN consented to undergo PRF. We lost one patient in follow-up. Seventy-nine percent of the patients described their condition as "(very) much better" at 3-month follow-up. At long-term follow-up, 89% of the patients described their condition as "(very) much better." No serious side effects were observed. In conclusion, PRF is a successful treatment option in patients not responding to standard treatment options, including pudendal nerve blocks. PRF of the pudendal nerve can be used for PN to provide relief in patients' chronic pelvic pain.

Long-term safety, objective and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without peritoneal closure.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is performed to support DeLancey's level I in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although several studies have been conducted on the safety, objective and subjective outcomes of LSC, the specific effect of retroperitonealisation of mesh is unknown. This study is aimed at analysing the safety, objective and subjective outcomes of the LSC without peritoneal closure of mesh. METHODS: The patients included have undergone an LSC for POP between 2004 and 2014. Retrospectively, a cohort of n = 178 was identified and asked to participate in a follow-up study. Chart research was performed. When informed consent was obtained, questionnaires were sent and the patients underwent a physical examination, including a POP-Q assessment. Each complication was scored by four reviewers for possibly being related to the non-peritonealisation of mesh. RESULTS: The data on the outcome cohorts were complete for safety n = 178, objective n = 124, and subjective n = 61. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score is provided in 106 questionnaires. In this study, 77 complications were observed in 49 different patients. The total success rate (no reoperation, no descent beyond the hymen and no bulging symptoms) is 59.0% with a median follow-up (IQR) of 35 months (18-51). Seventy-six patients (71.7%) described their condition as being (much) improved after LSC. CONCLUSIONS: Three serious complications observed during the 178 LSCs were, by full consensus, thought to be possibly related to the non-peritonealisation of mesh. More than 70% of the patients found their condition to be (much) improved after the procedure.

Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare medium-term efficacy and safety of a partially absorbable mesh kit and native tissue repair in pelvic organ prolapse (POP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with primary POP stage ≥ II were randomized to transvaginal trocar-guided partially absorbable mesh (81 women) or native tissue repair (82 women). Primary outcome was overall anatomical success (POP < stage II) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were composite success, global improvement, and adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (85%) of the women allocated to partially absorbable mesh underwent mesh surgery; 8 (10%) crossed over to native tissue repair and 4 women (5%) withdrew from the study. Eighty (98%) of the women allocated to native tissue repair underwent the assigned treatment and 2 (2%) withdrew. Twenty-four months later, 140 surgically treated women (89%) demonstrated an overall anatomical success of 39%; 45% (32 out of 71 women) for mesh, and 32% (22 out of 69) for native tissue repair (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.2). Composite success was 88 and 73% respectively (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.4). There was global improvement in 86% (48 out of 56 women) in the mesh group and in 77% (47 out of 60 women) in the native tissue group (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.3). Four women were diagnosed with mesh exposure at 2 years (6%). CONCLUSION: At 24 months, no significant anatomical or composite benefit of partially absorbable mesh over native tissue repair could be demonstrated in women who had been surgically treated for primary POP.

Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to evaluate clinically relevant long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh or native tissue repair in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: We performed a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on trocar-guided mesh placement or native tissue repair in women with recurrent POP. Primary outcome was composite success, defined as absence of POP beyond the hymen, absence of bulge symptoms, and absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, pain, and dyspareunia. Multiple imputation was used for missing data of composite success and pain; estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Between August 2006 and July 2008, 194 women were randomized; 190 underwent surgery. At 7 years, 142 (75%) were available for analysis, of whom, the primary outcome could be calculated in 127. Composite success was 53% (95% CI 41, 66) for mesh and 54% (95% CI 42, 65) for native tissue. Repeat surgery for POP was 25% for mesh and 16% for native tissue (difference 9%; 95% CI -5, 23) and occurred in untreated compartments in the mesh group and treated compartments in the native tissue group. Mesh exposure rate was 42%; pain with mesh 39% and native tissue 50% (difference - 11%, 95% CI -27, 6); dyspareunia with mesh 20% and native tissue 17% (difference 3%, 95% CI -9, 17). CONCLUSIONS: Seven-year composite success rates appeared similar for mesh and native tissue. Mesh did not reduce long-term repeat surgery rates due to de novo POP in nonmesh-treated vaginal compartments. Mesh exposure rates were high, though significant differences in pain and dyspareunia were not detected. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00372190.

Method and reliability of measuring midurethral area and echogenicity, and changes during and after pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Internal closure of the urethral sphincter is one of the mechanisms in maintaining continence. Little is known about changes in the urethral sphincter during pregnancy. We designed this study to develop a reliable method to measure the area and mean echogenicity of the midurethra during and after pregnancy and to assess changes over time. METHODS: Two observers independently segmented the urethra as follows: in the sagittal plane, the urethra was positioned vertically, the marker was placed in the middle section of the lumen of the urethra, and eight tomographic US images of 2.5 -mm slices were obtained. The central image was selected, and area and mean echogenicity were calculated automatically. Intra- and interobserver reliability were determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two hundred and eighty women underwent TPUS at 12 weeks and 36 weeks of gestation and 6 months postpartum, and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) images of 40 pregnant nulliparous women were used for the reliability study. Paired t tests were used to assess changes in echogenicity and area. RESULTS: The ICC for measuring the area was substantial, at 0.77 and for measuring mean echogenicity was almost perfect, at 0.86. In the total study group (n = 280), midurethral area and mean echogenicity were significantly lower 6 months after delivery compared with 12 and 36 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol for measuring area and mean echogenicity of the midurethra is reliable. This study indicates that structural changes in the midurethraoccur during pregnancy.

An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).

INTRODUCTION: The terminology for female pelvic floor prolapse (POP) should be defined and organized in a clinically-based consensus Report. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give a coding to definitions. An extensive process of fourteen rounds of internal and external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS: A Terminology Report for female POP, encompassing over 230 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction and POP. Female-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology and MRI) and conservative and surgical managements are major additions and appropriate figures have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts and measurements, in use in the literature and offering further research potential, but requiring further validation, have been included as an appendix. Interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for female POP has been produced to aid clinical practice and research.

Mean echogenicity and area of puborectalis muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy and after delivery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pregnancy and childbirth are risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Urinary continence depends on normal urethral support, which is provided by normal levator ani muscle function. Our objective was to compare mean echogenicity and the area of the puborectalis muscle between women with and those without SUI during and after their first pregnancy. METHODS: We examined 280 nulliparous women at a gestational age of 12 weeks, 36 weeks, and 6 months after delivery. They filled out the validated Urogenital Distress Inventory and underwent perineal ultrasounds. SUI was considered present if the woman answered positively to the question "do you experience urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing?" Mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle (MEP) and puborectalis muscle area (PMA) were calculated. The MEP and PMA during pregnancy and after delivery in women with and without SUI were compared using independent Student's t test. RESULTS: After delivery the MEP was higher in women with SUI if the pelvic floor was at rest or in contraction, with effect sizes of 0.30 and 0.31 respectively. No difference was found in the area of the puborectalis muscle between women with and those without SUI. CONCLUSIONS: Women with SUI after delivery had a statistically significant higher mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle compared with non-SUI women when the pelvic floor was at rest and in contraction; the effect sizes were small. This higher MEP is indicative of a relatively higher intramuscular extracellular matrix component and could represent diminished contractile function.

Changes in the mean echogenicity and area of the puborectalis muscle during pregnancy and postpartum.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) volume transperineal ultrasound imaging is increasingly used to assess changes in the dimensions of the pelvic floor during pregnancy and after delivery. Little is known with regard to the area of the puborectalis muscle and its structural changes. Echogenicity measurement, a parameter that provides information on the structure of muscles, is increasingly used in orthopaedics and neuromuscular disease evaluation. This study is aimed at assessing the changes in the mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle (MEP) and the puborectalis muscle area (PMA) during first pregnancy and after childbirth. METHODS: The MEP and PMA of 254 women during first pregnancy were measured at 12 and 36 weeks' gestation and 6 months postpartum. To determine the effect of child-birth on MEP and PMA, the results at 6 months postpartum were separately analysed for vaginal deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries (ventouse) and caesarean section deliveries. Mean differences in MEP and PMA were analysed using ANOVA statistics. RESULTS: The MEP at 6 months postpartum was, independent of manoeuvre, significantly (p < 0.001) lower than MEP values during pregnancy. After caesarean delivery, the PMA was significantly smaller at maximum pelvic floor contraction than PMA after vaginal delivery (p = 0.003) or operative vaginal delivery (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that structural changes in the puborectalis muscle during and after pregnancy, as measured by MEP, occur and can be analysed. In addition, the mode of delivery affects the area of the puborectalis during contraction after delivery. For true volume analysis, as part of an assessment of contractility of the puborectalis muscle we will need 3D volume analysis.

An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

INTRODUCTION: The terminology for female pelvic floor prolapse (POP) should be defined and organized in a clinically-based consensus Report. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give a coding to definitions. An extensive process of fourteen rounds of internal and external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS: A Terminology Report for female POP, encompassing over 230 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction and POP. Female-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology and MRI) and conservative and surgical managements are major additions and appropriate figures have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts and measurements, in use in the literature and offering further research potential, but requiring further validation, have been included as an appendix. Interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for female POP has been produced to aid clinical practice and research.

An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

INTRODUCTION: The terminology for female pelvic floor prolapse (POP) should be defined and organized in a clinically-based consensus Report. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give a coding to definitions. An extensive process of fourteen rounds of internal and external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). RESULTS: A Terminology Report for female POP, encompassing over 230 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction and POP. Female-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology and MRI) and conservative and surgical managements are major additions and appropriate figures have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts and measurements, in use in the literature and offering further research potential, but requiring further validation, have been included as an appendix. Interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for female POP has been produced to aid clinical practice and research.

Results of primary versus recurrent surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence in women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared cure rates and complication rates in patients who had undergone primary or recurrent (secondary) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study that included patients who underwent surgery to treat SUI in a tertiary referral center was carried out. All patients had, predominantly, SUI. Exclusion criteria were patients with a neurogenic bladder or a neobladder and patients without postoperative follow-up (FU). The primary objective was to assess the success rate, defined as cured SUI or improved SUI at six weeks and at the latest available moment of FU. The secondary objective was to assess complications. RESULTS: A total of 541 women with SUI underwent surgery for SUI between 2002 and 2010. After exclusion of 102 patients a total of 242 patients with primary SUI and 197 patients with recurrent SUI were identified. The success rate at first FU was 89 %. At last FU (median 205 days) the success rate was 83 % (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in success rate between primary and recurrent surgery at first FU. The overall success rate of primary surgery was 86 %; for recurrent surgery it was 79 %. During surgery, 27 bladder injuries occurred (6.2 %), with no significant difference between the two groups. At last FU, 11 patients (2.6 %) had persistent residual volume, necessitating prolonged clean intermittent self-catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: The results of recurrent surgery to treat recurrent or persistent SUI are still good in experienced hands and do not significantly differ from results of primary surgery. The complication rates are comparable to those of primary surgery.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to correlate dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements and pelvic floor symptoms in order to determine the value of dynamic MRI for evaluating vaginal vault prolapse both before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center cohort study in 43 patients who underwent a modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/hysteropexy operation using bone-anchor fixation and synthetic mesh. The study included dynamic MRI, POP-Q staging, and validated questionnaires before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. To assess MRI data, the pubococcygeal reference line and specifically defined anatomical landmarks for the separate compartments were used. Differences between pre- and postoperative measurements were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and correlations at the 0.05 level were considered to be significant (Pearson correlation, two tailed). RESULTS: At 6 months, a statistically significant improvement was seen in POP-Q staging for all compartments. Dynamic MRI measurements only revealed a significant improvement after surgery for the apical compartment. The correlation between (changes in) MRI measurements, POP-Q measurements, and validated questionnaires was poor. CONCLUSIONS: The value of dynamic MRI for evaluating and documenting changes in vaginal vault support and position after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is limited due to the poor correlation with both POP-Q staging and pelvic floor symptoms.

Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

AIMS: This study focused on the changes in urinary incontinence (UI) rates pre- and postoperatively and identified risk factors which predict the presence of symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) without concomitant or previous anti-incontinence surgery. METHODS: All consecutive women who underwent POP surgery without concomitant or previous anti-incontinence surgery in the years 2004-2010 were included. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up, including pelvic organ prolapse quantification score and a standardized urogynecological questionnaire (Urogenital Distress Inventory, UDI). Primary outcome of this study was stress and/or urgency UI postoperatively. Furthermore, this study measured the improvement or worsening of UI following surgery using the UDI. Univariable- and multivariable logistic regression with forward selection procedure was used to identify the risk factors. RESULTS: Nine hundred seven patients were included. De novo SUI appeared in 22% and de novo UUI occurred in 21% of the women. At 1-year 42% were cured for UUI and 39% were recovered from SUI by POP surgery alone. The best predictor for the occurrence of postoperative SUI or UUI was the presence of preoperative SUI or UUI. BMI and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative SUI. A recurrence in the anterior compartment protected against SUI postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative SUI or UUI is the most important predictor of SUI and UUI postoperatively. BMI and COPD were identified as important risk factors for SUI.

Sequential urodynamic assessment before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: Controversial data are available as to whether to perform a simultaneous abdominal or vaginal colposuspension operation in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy procedures. We wanted to evaluate the effect of a modified laparoscopic operation technique on urodynamic parameters and lower urinary tract symptoms. DESIGN: Prospective single center cohort study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. POPULATION: Forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent a modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/hysteropexy operation using bone anchor fixation and synthetic mesh, performed by the same laparoscopic surgeons. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative multichannel urodynamic evaluation and validated questionnaires. The same urologist, blinded to the results of the questionnaire survey, interpreted all urodynamic evaluations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effects of surgery on pelvic anatomy and patient satisfaction, urodynamic observations and diagnoses and symptom scores in validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Forty-two patients consented to pre- and postoperative urodynamic evaluation. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy successfully corrected vaginal vault prolapse in all 42 patients with urodynamic evaluation six months after surgery. The bladder volume at first desire to void was significantly increased and the maximal detrusor pressure at voiding phase was significantly decreased. In the questionnaires, irritative and storage voiding symptoms were significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that there are no adverse urodynamic findings following this modified technique for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The statistically significant urodynamic improvements are in accordance with the scores on the Urogenital Distress Inventory questionnaires. These results do not support a simultaneous routine prophylactic colposuspension procedure.

Outcomes and predictors of failure of trocar-guided vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the 1 year conventional and composite outcomes of trocar-guided vaginal mesh surgery and the identification of the predictors of failure. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study. Failure outcome definitions were as follows: I, prolapse stage II or greater in mesh treated compartments; II, overall prolapse stage II or greater; III, composite outcome of overall prolapse greater than the hymen and the presence of bulge symptoms or repeat surgery. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of failure. RESULTS: The results of the study were 1 year follow-up of 433 patients. Treated compartment failure (I) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-19). Overall prolapse failure (II) was 41% (95% CI, 36-45). Composite failure (III) was 9% (95% CI, 7-13). Predictor of failure in all outcomes was the combined anterior/posterior mesh with the uterus in situ. CONCLUSION: Outcome of prolapse surgery depends on outcome definition. The mesh treated compartment failure outcome (I) and the composite failure outcome (III) appeared not to be statistically different. Consistent factor for failure in all outcomes was the combined anterior/posterior mesh insertion with the uterus in situ.