Genetic heterogeneity: Challenges, impacts, and methods through an associative lens.

Genetic heterogeneity describes the occurrence of the same or similar phenotypes through different genetic mechanisms in different individuals. Robustly characterizing and accounting for genetic heterogeneity is crucial to pursuing the goals of precision medicine, for discovering novel disease biomarkers, and for identifying targets for treatments. Failure to account for genetic heterogeneity may lead to missed associations and incorrect inferences. Thus, it is critical to review the impact of genetic heterogeneity on the design and analysis of population level genetic studies, aspects that are often overlooked in the literature. In this review, we first contextualize our approach to genetic heterogeneity by proposing a high-level categorization of heterogeneity into "feature," "outcome," and "associative" heterogeneity, drawing on perspectives from epidemiology and machine learning to illustrate distinctions between them. We highlight the unique nature of genetic heterogeneity as a heterogeneous pattern of association that warrants specific methodological considerations. We then focus on the challenges that preclude effective detection and characterization of genetic heterogeneity across a variety of epidemiological contexts. Finally, we discuss systems heterogeneity as an integrated approach to using genetic and other high-dimensional multi-omic data in complex disease research.

Gene-Interaction-Sensitive enrichment analysis in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) uses gene-level univariate associations to identify gene set-phenotype associations for hypothesis generation and interpretation. We propose that GSEA can be adapted to incorporate SNP and gene-level interactions. To this end, gene scores are derived by Relief-based feature importance algorithms that efficiently detect both univariate and interaction effects (MultiSURF) or exclusively interaction effects (MultiSURF*). We compare these interaction-sensitive GSEA approaches to traditional χ2 rankings in simulated genome-wide array data, and in a target and replication cohort of congenital heart disease patients with conotruncal defects (CTDs). RESULTS: In the simulation study and for both CTD datasets, both Relief-based approaches to GSEA captured more relevant and significant gene ontology terms compared to the univariate GSEA. Key terms and themes of interest include cell adhesion, migration, and signaling. A leading edge analysis highlighted semaphorins and their receptors, the Slit-Robo pathway, and other genes with roles in the secondary heart field and outflow tract development. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that interaction-sensitive approaches to enrichment analysis can improve upon traditional univariate GSEA. This approach replicated univariate findings and identified additional and more robust support for the role of the secondary heart field and cardiac neural crest cell migration in the development of CTDs.