Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in asthma control: acute, dose-related effects and real-life effectiveness.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (BFMRT) in asthma control is well documented in large randomized controlled trials. However, the acute reliever effects and real-life effectiveness are seldom reported. METHODS: This multicenter trial enrolled steroid-naïve, symptomatic asthmatics with baseline exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) of ≥ 40 ppb. There were 120 eligible patients who were randomized and received a dose of inhaled budesonide/formoterol 320/9 µg (lower dose budesonide/formoterol), 640/18 µg (higher dose budesonide/formoterol (HDBF)), or terbutaline (TERB) 1 mg. Inflammatory cells and mediators in induced sputum, eNO and lung function were measured at baseline and 6 h (acute phase). Subsequently, all patients used BFMRT as real-life practice for 24 weeks (maintenance phase). RESULTS: In the acute phase, the degree of post-treatment reduction in total eosinophil counts, interleukin-8 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in induced sputum were significantly greater in group HDBF (vs TERB, P < 0.05). The increase in forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1 ) in group HDBF was significantly higher (vs LDBF and TERB, P < 0.05) 3 h after dosing. In the maintenance phase, significant improvement of asthma control (presented by eNO, FEV1 and a five-item asthma control questionnaire) in real-life settings was observed at 4 weeks and sustained to the end of study. The rate of patients who followed scheduled visits declined over time (87% at week 4 and 42% at week 24). CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide/formoterol as reliever exerts acute, dose-related anti-inflammatory effects and FEV1 improvement in symptomatic asthmatics. BFMRT is effective in asthma control. However, the decrease in long-term follow-up rate remains an issue to overcome in real-life settings.

Potentiality of impulse oscillometry to evaluate bronchodilator reversibility in untreated adult patients with newly diagnosed asthma.

BACKGROUND: Identifying positive bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) helps the diagnosis of asthma. However, not all patients can adequately perform the forced expiration during the spirometry test. An alternative test is required. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort-independent technique that enables the measurement of lung mechanics during quiet tidal breathing. We investigated the potentiality of IOS to evaluate BDR in untreated adult patients with newly diagnosed asthma (UAPNDS). METHODS: All UAPNDS (aged 20-80 years) who never smoke and underwent IOS and spirometry before and after salbutamol inhalation at their initial visit to the hospital from March 22, 2017, to December 31, 2019, were identified. A total of 323 patients were enrolled. Data from the medical record, including demographic characteristics, laboratory examination, spirometric data, and IOS parameters, were retrospectively reviewed. The associations of parameters with the positive BDR and the performance of parameters in predicting the positive BDR were evaluated by statistical methods. RESULTS: Patients (n = 323) had a median age of 64 years and were mostly female (67.5%). Several variables, including serum total immunoglobulin level, blood eosinophil counts, blood eosinophil percentage (%), and two IOS parameters, were found to be different between the positive (n = 93) and negative BDR (n = 230) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses after adjustment by cofactors revealed that the percentage change of the area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and resonant frequency [ΔAx (%)] after salbutamol inhalation was the only independent factor for the positive BDR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔAx (%) in predicting the positive BDR was 0.614 ( p = 0.0013), and its optimal cutoff value was -53.8% (sensitivity, 39.78% and specificity, 80.43%). CONCLUSION: In addition to spirometry, ΔAx (%), an IOS parameter, may serve as a novel indicator to evaluate BDR in UAPNDS.

Epidemiologic Analysis of Taiwanese Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Several databases of epidemiologic studies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been analyzed in the Western community. However, few studies have been reported in Asia. The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of IPF in Taiwan. We collected and analyzed patients with IPF from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2001 to 2011. We estimated the annual incidence and cumulative prevalence of IPF and mean survival time of patients and determined the causes of death. The annual incidence rates of IPF remained stable after 2005, ranging from 0.7 to 1.3 cases per 100,000 people per year, whereas the cumulative prevalence rates increased steadily from 3.1 to 6.4 cases per 100,000 people per year during 2006-2011 based on a narrow case definition. Men older than 75 years had higher incidence compared with other age groups. The mean survival after diagnosis was 6.9 years. Old age, male sex, and respiratory hospitalization were associated with shorter survival time after diagnosis. Both the incidence and prevalence rates of IPF were lower in Taiwanese patients than Western ones. Moreover, the survival time was higher in the Asian population compared with the Western population. These results may suggest the heterogeneity of the IPF definition in different study populations and geographic locations.

Correlation between potentially inappropriate medication and Alzheimer's disease among the elderly.

PURPOSE: This study is conducted to explore the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) among the elderly. METHODS: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to conduct a nationwide case-control study. Elderly individuals (over 65 years of age) who had been diagnosed with AD (ICD-9-CM: 331.0) for the first time in 2011 were selected as subjects for the case group. A control group was formed by selecting elderly patients without AD using 1:1 propensity score matching. Control variables included sex, age, health status, and 31 Elixhauser comorbidities. All analyses were performed using the Resource Utilization Band (Adjusted Clinical Groups software). All health utilization data associated with PIM were traced back for a period of 5 years. We examined the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PIM in relation to AD. RESULTS: We identified 5264 patients with AD (case group) and 5264 non-AD controls. After adjustment for confounding factors, proportion of all PIM (adjusted OR: 1.006, 95%CI: 1.002-1.010, p-value = 0.009) was significantly associated with AD. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed a significant positive correlation between PIM and AD among elderly population.

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist versus long-acting ß2 agonist/corticosteroid for moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: Exacerbation risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Whether the beneficial effects of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are better than those of long-acting ß2 agonist/corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) in preventing exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the risk of exacerbations in moderate to severe COPD patients receiving LAMA versus LABA/ICS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with COPD (2008-2010). The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 30% to 80% of predicted value and at least three prescriptions for COPD medication, including LAMA or LABA/ICS. RESULTS: Of the 557 COPD patients screened, 90 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The demographic characteristics of patients receiving LABA/ICS or LAMA were similar. The all exacerbation rates was significantly higher in patients with global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease stage II COPD treated with LABA/ICS than in those treated with LAMA (p = 0.001), regardless of previous exacerbation history. Patients with previous exacerbation history showed an independent increase in the risk of moderate or severe exacerbation compared with those without exacerbation history (hazard ratio 3.86, 95% CI 1.75-8.53, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In comparison with LABA/ICS, LAMA is beneficial in reducing exacerbation risk for moderate COPD. Previous exacerbation history independently predicts the future risk of exacerbation regardless of treatment.