Comparison of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver imaging reporting and data system to assess liver tumors before resection.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be noninvasively diagnosed through dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We compared the diagnostic performance of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in categorizing tumors by using the 2018 version of the Liver Imaging Reporting And Data System (LI-RADS v2018) and assessing liver tumors before resection. METHODS: Data from a prospective cohort from October 2011 to March 2019 on 106 hepatic tumors in 96 patients with suspected malignancy were included in this study. We performed preoperative CT and EOB-MRI, and reviewed these images retrospectively. Ninety-seven tumors from 87 patients were pathologically diagnosed as HCC, and nine tumors were non-HCC. The clinical data, imaging characteristics, diagnostic performance, and outcomes of CT and EOB-MRI were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: EOB-MRI had more favorable diagnostic performance (area under curve: 0.920 vs. 0.868) and significantly higher sensitivity (86.87% vs. 69.70%, p = 0.005) than did CT. However, the specificity of EOB-MRI did not differ from that of CT (88.89% vs. 88.89%, p > 0.999). Fourteen (14.5%) patients with pathologically verified HCC had lesions categorized as LI-RADS 4 through CT and as LI-RADS 5 through EOB-MRI. Patients with EOB-MRI-categorized but not CT-categorized LI-RADS 5 lesions had significantly longer overall survival than did those with LI-RADS 4 lesions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EOB-MRI had higher sensitivity than did CT in diagnosing HCC. Patients with EOB-MRI-categorized LI-RADS 5 lesions had more favorable outcomes than did those with LI-RADS 4 lesions after liver resection.

Automated liver volumetry and hepatic steatosis quantification with magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative imaging evaluation of liver volume and hepatic steatosis for the donor affects transplantation outcomes. However, computed tomography (CT) for liver volumetry and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for hepatic steatosis are time consuming. Therefore, we investigated the correlation of automated 3D-multi-echo-Dixon sequence magnetic resonance imaging (ME-Dixon MRI) and its derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) with CT liver volumetry and MRS hepatic steatosis measurements in living liver donors. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2017 to November 2022. We enrolled donors who received a dynamic CT scan and an MRI exam within 2 days. First, the CT volumetry was processed semiautomatically using commercial software, and ME-Dixon MRI volumetry was automatically measured using an embedded sequence. Next, the signal intensity of MRI-PDFF volumetric data was correlated with MRS as the gold standard. RESULTS: We included the 165 living donors. The total liver volume of ME-Dixon MRI was significantly correlated with CT (r = 0.913, p < 0.001). The fat percentage measured using MRI-PDFF revealed a strong correlation between automatic segmental volume and MRS (r = 0.705, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the hepatic steatosis group (MRS ≥5%) had a strong correlation than the non-hepatic steatosis group (MRS <5%) in both volumetric (r = 0.906 vs. r = 0.887) and fat fraction analysis (r = 0.779 vs. r = 0.338). CONCLUSION: Automated ME-Dixon MRI liver volumetry and MRI-PDFF were strongly correlated with CT liver volumetry and MRS hepatic steatosis measurements, especially in donors with hepatic steatosis.

Procedure-related risk factors for bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Bleeding is the most dreaded complication after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Clarifying the risk factors of bleeding can reduce the morbidity and mortality rates of PTBD. However, the procedure-related risk factors for bleeding after PTBD are still controversial. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify procedure-related risk factors of bleeding after PTBD. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar were searched for published studies until 1st May 2021. Inclusion criteria were: studies associated with bleeding complications after PTBD and with sufficient data to compare different procedure-related factors for bleeding. Sources of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. Probable procedure-related risk factors were evaluated and outcomes were expressed in the case of dichotomous variables, as an odds ratio (OR) (with a 95% confidence interval, (CI)). RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in bleeding rates with respect to the side of PTBD (left/right, OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.68-1.76), the insertion level of bile duct (central/peripheral, OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.82-2.35), and the usage of ultrasound guidance (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.60-2.60). A subgroup analysis revealed a left-sided approach that resulted in more hepatic arterial injuries than the right-sided approach (left/right, OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.32-2.83). CONCLUSION: Left-sided approach is a risk factor for hepatic arterial injuries after PTBD.