Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(31): 682-685, 2024 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116024

ABSTRACT

Since 1994, the U.S. Vaccines for Children (VFC) program has covered the cost of vaccines for children whose families might not otherwise be able to afford vaccines. This report assessed and quantified the health benefits and economic impact of routine U.S. childhood immunizations among both VFC-eligible and non-VFC-eligible children born during 1994-2023. Diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines; measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; hepatitis B vaccine; varicella vaccine; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; hepatitis A vaccine; and rotavirus vaccine were included. Averted illnesses and deaths and associated costs over the lifetimes of 30 annual cohorts of children born during 1994-2023 were estimated using established economic models. Net savings were calculated from the payer and societal perspectives. Among approximately 117 million children born during 1994-2023, routine childhood vaccinations will have prevented approximately 508 million lifetime cases of illness, 32 million hospitalizations, and 1,129,000 deaths, at a net savings of $540 billion in direct costs and $2.7 trillion in societal costs. From both payer and societal perspectives, routine childhood vaccinations among children born during 1994-2023 resulted in substantial cost savings. Childhood immunizations continue to provide substantial health and economic benefits, while promoting health equity.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs , Humans , United States , Infant , Immunization Programs/economics , Child, Preschool , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines/economics , Immunization/economics , Immunization/statistics & numerical data
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(7)2024 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610242

ABSTRACT

Current real-time direction judgment systems are inaccurate and insensitive, as well as limited by the sampling rate of analog-to-digital converters. To address this problem, we propose a dynamic real-time direction judgment system based on an integral dual-frequency laser interferometer and field-programmable gate array technology. The optoelectronic signals resulting from the introduction of a phase subdivision method based on the amplitude resolution of the laser interferometer when measuring displacement are analyzed. The proposed system integrates the optoelectronic signals to increase the accuracy of its direction judgments and ensures these direction judgments are made in real time by dynamically controlling the integration time. Several experiments were conducted to verify the performance of the proposed system. The results show that, compared with current real-time direction judgment systems, the proposed system makes accurate judgements during low-speed motions and can update directions within 0.125 cycles of the phase difference change at different speeds. Moreover, a sweep frequency experiment confirmed the system's ability to effectively judge dynamic directions. The proposed system is capable of accurate and real-time directional judgment during low-speed movements of a table in motion.

3.
Opt Express ; 31(18): 29255-29270, 2023 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37710730

ABSTRACT

To improve the measurement accuracy of interferometer displacement measurement systems, this study analyzes the characteristics of the interference signal to identify sources of nonlinear errors and develops compensation strategies. Specifically, a model is established for the nonlinear errors of the interferometer, which can be attributed to a laser and polarizing beam splitter (PBS). Following that, the dual orthogonal lock-in amplification algorithm is used to separate and compensate for the frequency uncertainty and amplitude errors. Additionally, a real-time compensation algorithm based on ellipse fitting is proposed to compensate for errors caused by the PBS and the uncertainty of amplitude caused by the light source. Experimental results demonstrate that the peak-to-peak value of the compensated nonlinear error is reduced from 11.62 nm to 5.37 nm.

4.
J Infect Dis ; 226(Suppl 4): S463-S469, 2022 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the health and economic impact of the varicella vaccination program on varicella disease in the United States (US), 1996-2020. METHODS: Analysis was conducted using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or published annual population-based varicella incidence, and varicella-associated hospitalization, outpatient visit, and mortality rates in the US population aged 0-49 years during 1996-2020 (range, 199.5-214.2 million persons) compared to before vaccination (1990-1994). Disease costs were estimated using the societal perspective. Vaccination program costs included costs of vaccine, administration, postvaccination adverse events, and travel and work time lost to obtain vaccination. All costs were adjusted to 2020 US dollars using a 3% annual discount rate. The main outcome measures were the number of varicella-associated cases, hospitalizations, hospitalization days, and premature deaths prevented; life-years saved; and net societal savings from the US varicella vaccination program. RESULTS: Among US persons aged 0-49 years, during 1996-2020, it is estimated that more than 91 million varicella cases, 238 000 hospitalizations, 1.1 million hospitalization days, and almost 2000 deaths were prevented and 118 000 life-years were saved by the varicella vaccination program, at net societal savings of $23.4 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Varicella vaccination has resulted in substantial disease prevention and societal savings for the US over 25 years of program implementation.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox , Vaccines , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Immunization Programs , Vaccination , Cost of Illness
5.
Am J Public Health ; 112(5): 719-723, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324263

ABSTRACT

New York City (NYC) introduced a universal prekindergarten program in 2014 that mandated influenza vaccination for enrollment. We conducted a difference-in-difference-in-differences study to evaluate the program using 2012 to 2019 MarketScan claims data. After the introduction of the program, influenza vaccine uptake among four-year-old children in NYC during the subsequent seasons increased by 6.3 to 9.8 percentage points compared with the rest of New York State. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(5):719-723. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306765).


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , New York City , Schools , Seasons , Vaccination
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(8): 1101-1109, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New cases of COVID-19 continue to occur daily in the United States, and the need for medical treatments continues to grow. Knowledge of the direct medical costs of COVID-19 treatments is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of older adults with COVID-19 and their costs for COVID-19-related medical care. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Medical claims for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. PATIENTS: Medicare FFS beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who had a COVID-19-related medical encounter during April through December 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics and direct medical costs of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Among 28.1 million Medicare FFS beneficiaries, 1Ā 181Ā 127 (4.2%) sought COVID-19-related medical care. Among these patients, 23.0% had an inpatient stay and 4.2% died during hospitalization. The majority of the patients were female (57.0%), non-Hispanic White (79.6%), and residents of an urban county (77.2%). Medicare FFS costs for COVID-19-related medical care were $6.3 billion; 92.6% of costs were for hospitalizations. The mean hospitalization cost was $21Ā 752, and the mean length of stay was 9.2 days; hospitalization cost and length of stay were higher if the patient needed a ventilator ($49Ā 441 and 17.1 days) or died ($32Ā 015 and 11.3 days). The mean cost per outpatient visit was $164. Patients aged 75 years or older were more likely to be hospitalized, but their hospitalizations were associated with lower costs than for younger patients. Male sex and non-White race/ethnicity were associated with higher probability of being hospitalized and higher medical costs. LIMITATION: Results are based on Medicare FFS patients. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantial disease and economic burden among older Americans, particularly those of non-White race/ethnicity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , COVID-19/economics , Direct Service Costs , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Medicare/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Direct Service Costs/trends , Fee-for-Service Plans , Female , Hospital Costs/trends , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(7): 245-249, 2021 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600384

ABSTRACT

On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak (1). In response, many state and local governments issued shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders, restricting nonessential activities outside residents' homes (2). CDC initially issued guidance recommending postponing routine adult vaccinations, which was later revised to recommend continuing to administer routine adult vaccines (3). In addition, factors such as disrupted operations of health care facilities and safety concerns regarding exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, resulted in delay or avoidance of routine medical care (4), likely further affecting delivery of routine adult vaccinations. Medicare enrollment and claims data of Parts A (hospital insurance), B (medical insurance), and D (prescription drug insurance) were examined to assess the change in receipt of routine adult vaccines during the pandemic. Weekly receipt of four vaccines (13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV13], 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPSV23], tetanus-diphtheria or tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine [Td/Tdap], and recombinant zoster vaccine [RZV]) by Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years during January 5-July 18, 2020, was compared with that during January 6-July 20, 2019, for the total study sample and by race and ethnicity. Overall, weekly administration rates of the four examined vaccines declined by up to 89% after the national emergency declaration in mid-March (1) compared with those during the corresponding period in 2019. During the first week following the national emergency declaration, the weekly vaccination rates were 25%-62% lower than those during the corresponding week in 2019. After reaching their nadirs of 70%-89% below 2019 rates in the second to third week of April 2020, weekly vaccination rates gradually began to recover through mid-July, but by the last study week were still lower than were those during the corresponding period in 2019, with the exception of PPSV23. Vaccination declined sharply for all vaccines studied, overall and across all racial and ethnic groups. While the pandemic continues, vaccination providers should emphasize to patients the importance of continuing to receive routine vaccinations and provide reassurance by explaining the procedures in place to ensure patient safety (3).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged , Humans , United States/epidemiology
8.
Prev Med ; 134: 106066, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199910

ABSTRACT

Currently, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends one-time tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination for all adults 19 years and older. This study is designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Tdap vaccination for Tdap-eligible adults aged 19 through 85 in the United States. A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compute costs and health outcomes associated with pertussis among 100,000 Tdap-eligible persons of each age cohort. From the societal perspective, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved was evaluated under the vaccination scenarios. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to evaluate the impacts of changes in key variables. All costs were adjusted to 2018 US$ with an annual discount rate of 3% applied to costs and outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for vaccinating US adults aged 19 to 85 with Tdap ranged from $248,000/QALY to $900,000/QALY. The lowest cost per QALY was found to be $248,000 for the age 65 cohort, followed by $332,000 for the cohort of age 19, and followed by $477,000 for the age 50 cohort. Sensitivity analysis showed the most dramatic changes in ICER occurred when changing the underreporting factor, vaccine effectiveness and vaccination costs. While Tdap vaccination may not be as cost effective as predicted earlier, it remains the best available preventive measure against pertussis. Further investigation of the true burden of pertussis disease among adults and the effectiveness of Tdap vaccination in this population is needed to better estimate the impact of Tdap vaccination.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , United States
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 170(6): 380-388, 2019 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30776797

ABSTRACT

Background: The U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently developed recommendations for use of a new recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV compared with zoster vaccine live (ZVL) and no vaccination, the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV for persons who have previously received ZVL, and the cost-effectiveness of preferential vaccination with RZV over ZVL. Design: Simulation (state-transition) model using U.S. epidemiologic, clinical, and cost data. Data Sources: Published data. Target Population: Hypothetical cohort of immunocompetent U.S. adults aged 50 years or older. Time Horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Societal and health care sector. Intervention: Vaccination with RZV (recommended 2-dose regimen), vaccination with ZVL, and no vaccination. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results of Base-Case Analysis: For vaccination with RZV compared with no vaccination, ICERs ranged by age from $10Ā 000 to $47Ā 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), using a societal perspective and assuming 100% completion of the 2-dose RZV regimen. For persons aged 60 years or older, ICERs were less than $60Ā 000 per QALY. Vaccination with ZVL was dominated by vaccination with RZV for all age groups 60 years or older. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Results were most sensitive to changes in vaccine effectiveness, duration of protection, herpes zoster incidence, and probability of postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination with RZV after previous administration of ZVL yielded an ICER of less than $60Ā 000 per QALY for persons aged 60 years or older. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, RZV remained the preferred strategy in at least 95% of simulations, including those with 50% completion of the second dose. Limitation: Few data were available on risk for serious adverse events, adherence to the recommended 2-dose regimen, and probability of recurrent zoster. Conclusion: Vaccination with RZV yields cost-effectiveness ratios lower than those for many recommended adult vaccines, including ZVL. Results are robust over a wide range of plausible values. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Epidemiologic Research Design , Health Policy , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/adverse effects , Humans , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Secondary Prevention , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/economics
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 116-123, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30807459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate costs of labor and materials by the University of Washington (UW) and state and local public health departments (PHDs) to respond to the February to June 2017 UW mumps outbreak, where 42 cases were identified among students (primarily sorority and fraternity members), staff, and associated community members. DESIGN: We applied standard cost analysis methodology using a combined public health and university perspective to examine the cost of responding to the outbreak. SETTING: UW's Seattle campus encompasses 703 acres with approximately 32 000 undergraduate students. Nearly 15% of the undergraduate population are members of fraternities or sororities. Housing for the fraternities and sororities is adjacent to the UW campus and consists of 50 houses. PARTICIPANTS: During the outbreak, customized costing tools based on relevant staff or faculty positions and activities were provided to the UW and Public Health-Seattle & King County, populated by each person participating in the outbreak response, and then collected and analyzed. Laboratory hours and material costs were collected from the Washington Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Labor and material costs provided by the UW and PHDs during the outbreak were collected and categorized by payer and activity. RESULTS: Total costs to the UW and PHDs in responding to the outbreak were $282 762 ($6692 per case). Of these, the UW spent $160 064, while PHDs spent $122 098. Labor accounted for 77% of total outbreak costs, and UW response planning and coordination accounted for the largest amount of labor costs ($75 493) overall. CONCLUSIONS: Given the current university and public health department budget constraints, the response to the outbreak amounted to a significant use of resources. Labor was the largest driver of costs for the outbreak response; UW labor costs-related to campus response planning and coordination-dominated the total economic burden from public health and university perspectives.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mumps/economics , Public Health/economics , Universities/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mumps/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Universities/organization & administration , Washington/epidemiology
11.
Med Care ; 57(6): 410-416, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31022074

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vaccinations are recommended to prevent serious morbidity and mortality. However, providers' concerns regarding costs and payments for providing vaccination services are commonly reported barriers to adult vaccination. Information on the costs of providing vaccination is limited, especially for adults. METHODS: We recruited 4 internal medicine, 4 family medicine, 2 pediatric, 2 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) practices, and 2 community health clinics in North Carolina to participate in a study to assess the economic costs and benefits of providing vaccination services for adults and children. We conducted a time-motion assessment of vaccination-related activities in the provider office and a survey to providers on vaccine management costs. We estimated mean cost per vaccination, minimum and maximum payments received, and income. RESULTS: Across all provider settings, mean cost per vaccine administration was $14 with substantial variation by practice setting (pediatric: $10; community health clinics: $15; family medicine: $17; OBGYN: $23; internal medicine: $23). When receiving the maximum payment, all provider settings had positive income for vaccination services. When receiving the minimum reported payments for vaccination services, pediatric and family medicine practices had positive income, internal medicine, and OBGYN practices had approximately equal costs and payments, and community health clinics had losses or negative income. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, vaccination service providers appeared to have small positive income from vaccination services. In some cases, providers experienced negative income, which underscores the need for providers and policymakers to design interventions and system improvements to make vaccination services financially sustainable for all provider types.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics , Practice Management, Medical/economics , Vaccination/economics , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , North Carolina , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time and Motion Studies
12.
Health Econ ; 27(2): 252-265, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660666

ABSTRACT

Vaccine purchase cost has grown substantially over the last few decades. A closer look at vaccine prices reveals that not all vaccines shared the same increasing pattern. Various factors, such as vaccine attributes, competition, and supply shortages, could relate to price changes. In this study, we examined whether a variety of factors influenced the prices of noninfluenza childhood vaccines purchased in the public sector from 1996 to 2014. The association differed among price-capped vaccines and combination vaccines. There was an increasing time trend in real prices for non-price-capped vaccines, which was mostly offset by the effect of market longevity. The effect of competition in lowering prices was more pronounced among non-price-capped vaccines when manufacturer and vaccine component fixed effects were excluded. Supply shortage, manufacturer name change, and number of vaccine doses in series showed no effect. The results may help policy makers better understand price behaviors and make more informed decisions in vaccine planning and financing.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis/trends , Public Sector , Vaccination/economics , Vaccines/economics , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Substitution , Economic Competition , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pediatrics , Vaccines/supply & distribution
13.
N Engl J Med ; 365(12): 1108-17, 2011 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21992123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine vaccination of U.S. infants with pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) began in 2006. METHODS: Using MarketScan databases, we assessed RV5 coverage and diarrhea-associated health care use from July 2007 through June 2009 versus July 2001 through June 2006 in children under 5 years of age. We compared the rates of diarrhea-associated health care use in unvaccinated children in the period from January through June (when rotavirus is most prevalent) in 2008 and 2009 with the prevaccine rates to estimate indirect benefits. We estimated national reductions in the number of hospitalizations for diarrhea, and associated costs, by extrapolation. RESULTS: By December 31, 2008, at least one dose of RV5 had been administered in 73% of children under 1 year of age, 64% of children 1 year of age, and 8% of children 2 to 4 years of age. Among children under 5 years of age, rates of hospitalization for diarrhea in 2001-2006, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009 were 52, 35, and 39 cases per 10,000 person-years, respectively, for relative reductions from 2001-2006 by 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31 to 35) in 2007-2008 and by 25% (95% CI, 23 to 27) in 2008-2009; rates of hospitalization specifically coded for rotavirus infection were 14, 4, and 6 cases per 10,000 person-years, respectively, for relative reductions in the rate from 2001-2006 by 75% (95% CI, 72 to 77) in 2007-2008 and by 60% (95% CI, 58 to 63) in 2008-2009. In the January-June periods of 2008 and 2009, the respective relative rate reductions among vaccinated children as compared with unvaccinated children were as follows: hospitalization for diarrhea, 44% (95% CI, 33 to 53) and 58% (95% CI, 52 to 64); rotavirus-coded hospitalization, 89% (95% CI, 79 to 94) and 89% (95% CI, 84 to 93); emergency department visits for diarrhea, 37% (95% CI, 31 to 43) and 48% (95% CI, 44 to 51); and outpatient visits for diarrhea, 9% (95% CI, 6 to 11) and 12% (95% CI, 10 to 15). Indirect benefits (in unvaccinated children) were seen in 2007-2008 but not in 2008-2009. Nationally, for the 2007-2009 period, there was an estimated reduction of 64,855 hospitalizations, saving approximately $278 million in treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Since the introduction of rotavirus vaccine, diarrhea-associated health care utilization and medical expenditures for U.S. children have decreased substantially.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Cost Savings , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Diarrhea/economics , Diarrhea/virology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Rotavirus Infections/complications , United States/epidemiology
14.
J Pediatr ; 164(3): 625-30, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286572

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine preventive care visit patterns among commercially insured adolescents during 2003-2010. In 2005-2007, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended 3 vaccines targeted at adolescents. We also investigate the relationship between preventive care visits and immunization. STUDY DESIGN: Data were drawn from the MarketScan database. Adolescents aged 11-21 continuously enrolled in the same insurance plan during the calendar year were included. We calculated the annual proportion of adolescents with at least 1 preventive and 1 vaccination-related visit. Longitudinal analyses were conducted by following the 1992 birth cohort for 8 consecutive years. RESULTS: The proportion of adolescents making at least 1 preventive visit increased from 24.6%-41.1% during 2003-2010. The rate of vaccination-related visits increased from 12.9%-26.3%. The magnitude of the increase in preventive and vaccination-related visits was greater during the years in which ACIP issued recommendations. The rates of preventive and vaccination-related visits were considerably higher among female and early adolescents and adolescents in managed care plans. Longitudinal analyses indicated that only 2.4% of adolescents had an annual preventive visit during the 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Yearly improvements in preventive care visits by adolescents were substantial. ACIP recommendations may be associated with this improvement. However, ongoing efforts are needed to improve the use and delivery of preventive care services.


Subject(s)
Office Visits/trends , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/trends , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Managed Care Programs , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(16): 352-5, 2014 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24759657

ABSTRACT

The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program was created by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and first implemented in 1994. VFC was designed to ensure that eligible children do not contract vaccine-preventable diseases because of inability to pay for vaccine and was created in response to a measles resurgence in the United States that resulted in approximately 55,000 cases reported during 1989-1991. The resurgence was caused largely by widespread failure to vaccinate uninsured children at the recommended age of 12-15 months. To summarize the impact of the U.S. immunization program on the health of all children (both VFC-eligible and not VFC-eligible) who were born during the 20 years since VFC began, CDC used information on immunization coverage from the National Immunization Survey (NIS) and a previously published cost-benefit model to estimate illnesses, hospitalizations, and premature deaths prevented and costs saved by routine childhood vaccination during 1994-2013. Coverage for many childhood vaccine series was near or above 90% for much of the period. Modeling estimated that, among children born during 1994- 2013, vaccination will prevent an estimated 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalizations, and 732,000 deaths over the course of their lifetimes, at a net savings of $295 billion in direct costs and $1.38 trillion in total societal costs. With support from the VFC program, immunization has been a highly effective tool for improving the health of U.S. children.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Disease Control/economics , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child Health Services/economics , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Immunization Programs/economics , Infant , Program Evaluation , United States
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 141(3): 563-569, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and infant influenza vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of individuals aged 15-49 years who were continually privately insured from August 2017 to May 2019 and had singleton live births between September 2017 and February 2018 and their infants. Influenza vaccination coverage was assessed for pregnant people during the 2017-2018 influenza season and for their infants during the 2018-2019 season using the 2017-2019 MarketScan data. Multivariate log-binomial regressions were conducted to examine the association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and infant influenza vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 34,919 pregnant people in this analysis, 14,168 (40.6%) received influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Of the infants born to people vaccinated during pregnancy, 90.0% received at least one dose of influenza vaccine during the 2018-2019 season and 75.5% received at least two doses. Of the infants born to those not vaccinated during pregnancy, 66.3% received at least one dose of influenza vaccine and 51.8% received at least two doses. At-least-one-dose coverage was 35.7% higher (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.34, 95% CI 1.33-1.36) and at-least-two-dose coverage was 45.8% higher (aRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.41-1.46) for infants born to people who received influenza vaccination during pregnancy compared with infants born to people who did not. CONCLUSION: Our results show a positive and statistically significant relationship between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and infant influenza vaccination status in their first season eligible for vaccination. Interventions to increase influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant people may also increase infant influenza vaccination coverage, offering greater protection against serious complications of influenza in both vulnerable populations.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Female , Infant , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination
17.
AJPM Focus ; 2(1): 100060, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37789941

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Vaccination with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine during pregnancy is highly effective against Bordetella pertussis in young infants. We aimed to evaluate the uptake of maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination during the recommended gestation period of 27 through 36 weeks among women enrolled in a public medical insurance plan in the U.S. Methods: In this analysis using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services insurance claims data, we identified women aged 15 through 49 years who delivered a live-born infant from 2016 through 2019. We identified claims for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination to calculate the proportion of women who were vaccinated during Weeks 27 through 36 of gestation in each calendar year. We also assessed the average annual maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis coverage by age group, race and ethnicity, U.S. Census region of residence, and plan type. Data were analyzed in 2021. Results: Among 4,318,823 deliveries, the 4-year national average for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination was 26%, improving from 22% in 2016 to 31% in 2019 (p<0.001). Within subgroups, the lowest 4-year average coverage was among women aged 15 through 18 years (22%); Black, non-Hispanic (23%) and Hispanic women (24%); those residing in the South (18%); those enrolled in a Children's Health Insurance Program plan (22%); and those covered by a fee-for-service plan (19%). Coverage increased across all subgroups from 2016 through 2019. Conclusions: Although maternal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis coverage among publicly insured women in the U.S. increased from 2016 through 2019, it remained considerably lower than estimated national coverage, with notable differences by race and ethnicity.

18.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 32(3): 260-270, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36884385

ABSTRACT

Pregnant women* and their infants are at increased risk for serious influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19-related complications, including preterm birth, low-birth weight, and maternal and fetal death. The advisory committee on immunization practices recommends pregnant women receive tetanus-toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, and influenza and COVID-19 vaccines before or during pregnancy. Vaccination coverage estimates and factors associated with maternal vaccination are measured by various surveillance systems. The objective of this report is to provide a detailed overview of the following surveillance systems that can be used to assess coverage of vaccines recommended for pregnant women: Internet panel survey, National Health Interview Survey, National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, Vaccine Safety Datalink, and MarketScan. Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage estimates vary by data source, and select estimates are presented. Each surveillance system differs in the population of pregnant women, time period, geographic area for which estimates can be obtained, how vaccination status is determined, and data collected regarding vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers. Thus, multiple systems are useful for a more complete understanding of maternal vaccination. Ongoing surveillance from the various systems to obtain vaccination coverage and information regarding disparities and barriers related to vaccination are needed to guide program and policy improvements.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Premature Birth , Whooping Cough , Adult , Infant , Female , United States , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Humans , Pregnant Women , Vaccination Coverage , COVID-19 Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use
19.
Public Health Rep ; 137(4): 739-748, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34161183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women are at increased risk of serious complications from influenza and are recommended to receive an influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess trends, timing patterns, and associated factors of influenza vaccination among pregnant women. METHODS: We used 2010-2018 MarketScan data on 1 286 749 pregnant women aged 15-49 who were privately insured to examine trends and timing patterns of influenza vaccination coverage. We examined descriptive statistics and identified factors associated with vaccination uptake by using multivariate log-binomial and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: In-plan influenza vaccination coverage before delivery increased from 22.0% during the 2010-2011 influenza season to 33.2% during the 2017-2018 influenza season. About two-thirds of vaccinated women received the vaccine in September or October during each influenza season. For women who delivered in September through May, influenza vaccination coverage increased rapidly at the beginning of influenza season and flattened after October. For women who delivered in June through August, influenza vaccination coverage increased gradually until February and flattened thereafter. Most vaccinated women who delivered before January received the vaccine in the third trimester. Increased likelihood of being vaccinated was associated with age 31-40, living in a metropolitan statistical area, living outside the South, enrollment in a consumer-driven or high-deductible health plan, being spouses or dependents of policy holders, and delivery in November through January. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increases during the past several years, vaccination uptake is still suboptimal, particularly after October. Health care provider education on timing of vaccination and recommendations throughout influenza seasons are needed to improve influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Insurance, Health , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnant Women , United States , Vaccination
20.
Am J Prev Med ; 63(1): 107-110, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35317958

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: National Immunization Survey-Child data are used widely to assess childhood vaccination coverage in the U.S. This study compares National Immunization Survey-Child coverage estimates with estimates using other supplementary data sources. METHODS: Retrospective analyses in 2021 assessed vaccination coverage of privately insured children for vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices by age 2 years, using the 2015-2018 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases and the 2018-2019 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. The coverage estimates were compared statistically with those using the 2016-2018 National Immunization Survey-Child. RESULTS: Estimated coverage ranged from 69.9% (≥2 doses of influenza vaccine) to 95.0% (≥3 doses of diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis vaccine) using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data and from 68.0% (≥2 doses of influenza vaccine) to 92.2% (≥1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine) using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. The difference between the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and National Immunization Survey-Child estimates ranged from 0.1 to 4.3 percentage points and was statistically significant for 6 of the 13 assessed vaccines/doses and percentage of children receiving no vaccinations. The difference between the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set and National Immunization Survey-Child estimates ranged from 0.4 to 7.2 percentage points and was statistically significant for 6 of the 10 assessed vaccines/doses. CONCLUSIONS: For certain vaccines and populations of interest, the National Immunization Survey-Child, MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set data might give comparable coverage of privately insured children.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Vaccination Coverage , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Insurance, Health , Retrospective Studies , United States , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL