Alterations in epidermal growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) shows a 5-year survival rate below 10%, demonstrating the urgency in improving its treatment. Alterations in epidermal growth factor receptors are closely related to malignancy transformation in a number of tumors and recent successful targeted therapies have been directed to these molecules. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the expression of EGFR and HER2 and evaluated EGFR mutation profile as well as the presence of mutations in hotspots of KRAS and BRAF in ESCC patients. METHODS: We performed RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent in situ hybridization to determine EGFR and HER2 expression in ESCC patients, and direct sequencing and PCR-RFLP for mutations and polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: Our results showed an increased EGFR mRNA expression in tumors compared to surrounding tissue (p <0.05), with 11% of the cases presenting at least a four-fold difference between tumor and paired adjacent mucosa. EGFR protein overexpression was present only in 4% of the cases. The median expression of HER2 mRNA was not different between tumors and adjacent mucosa. Still, 7% of the tumors presented at least a 25-fold higher expression of this gene when compared to its paired counterpart. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that 21% of the tumors were positive for HER2 (scores 2+ and 3+), although only 3+ tumors presented amplification of this gene. Mutation analysis for EGFR (exons 18-21), KRAS (codons 12 and 13) and BRAF (V600E) showed no mutations in any of the hotspots of these genes in almost 100 patients analyzed. EGFR presented synonymous polymorphisms at codon 836 (C>T) in 2.1% of the patients, and at codon 787 (G>A) in 79.2% of the cases. This last polymorphism was also evaluated in 304 healthy controls, which presented a similar frequency (73.7%) in comparison with ESCC patients. The absence of mutations of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF as well as the overexpression of EGFR and HER2 in less than 10% of the patients suggest that this signaling pathway is altered in only a small proportion of patients with ESCC. CONCLUSION: HER receptors target therapies may have the potential to be effective in only a minor fraction of patients with ESCC.

ERM/ETV5 and RUNX1/AML1 expression in endometrioid adenocarcinomas of endometrium and association with neoplastic progression.

The majority of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EEC) is diagnosed at stage I. Among these, 30% present myometrial invasion (stage IB), which is associated with tumor spread and relapse after primary treatment. Although an increased expression of RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 in EEC have been suggested to be associated with early events of myometrial infiltration, there is no data regarding its expression along the evolution of EEC and possible associations with other clinicopathological parameters. Therefore, ERM/ETV5 and RUNX1/AML1 protein and gene expression profiles were assessed in different EEC stages to evaluate their role in endometrial carcinogenesis. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 219 formalin fixed paraffin embedded endometrioid tumors and in 12 normal atrophic and proliferative endometrium samples. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 genes expression were analyzed by RT-qPCR. RUNX1/AML1 and ERM/ETV5 expression were decreased with increasing EEC stage, with a positive correlation between protein and gene expression for ERM/ETV5, but not for RUNX1/AML1. Both proteins were present in the nucleus of the tumor cells, whereas RUNX1/AML1, but not ERM/ETV5, was expressed in 7 out of 12 normal endometrial samples, with its expression being restricted to the cytoplasm of the positive cells. We concluded that there is a higher expression of ERM/ETV5 in early stages of EEC, whereas there seems to be a RUNX1/AML1 translocation from cytoplasm to nucleus in EEC neoplastic transformation.