Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Cell ; 176(5): 1083-1097.e18, 2019 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739799

ABSTRACT

Cell size varies greatly between cell types, yet within a specific cell type and growth condition, cell size is narrowly distributed. Why maintenance of a cell-type specific cell size is important remains poorly understood. Here we show that growing budding yeast and primary mammalian cells beyond a certain size impairs gene induction, cell-cycle progression, and cell signaling. These defects are due to the inability of large cells to scale nucleic acid and protein biosynthesis in accordance with cell volume increase, which effectively leads to cytoplasm dilution. We further show that loss of scaling beyond a certain critical size is due to DNA becoming limiting. Based on the observation that senescent cells are large and exhibit many of the phenotypes of large cells, we propose that the range of DNA:cytoplasm ratio that supports optimal cell function is limited and that ratios outside these bounds contribute to aging.


Subject(s)
Cell Enlargement , Cellular Senescence/physiology , Cytoplasm/metabolism , Candida albicans/genetics , Candida albicans/growth & development , Cell Cycle , Cell Proliferation , Cell Size , Cellular Senescence/genetics , Fibroblasts/metabolism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Primary Cell Culture , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/growth & development , Saccharomycetales/genetics , Saccharomycetales/growth & development , Saccharomycetales/metabolism , Signal Transduction
2.
Mol Cell ; 81(10): 2231-2245.e11, 2021 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33826921

ABSTRACT

Long undecoded transcript isoforms (LUTIs) represent a class of non-canonical mRNAs that downregulate gene expression through the combined act of transcriptional and translational repression. While single gene studies revealed important aspects of LUTI-based repression, how these features affect gene regulation on a global scale is unknown. Using transcript leader and direct RNA sequencing, here, we identify 74 LUTI candidates that are specifically induced in meiotic prophase. Translational repression of these candidates appears to be ubiquitous and is dependent on upstream open reading frames. However, LUTI-based transcriptional repression is variable. In only 50% of the cases, LUTI transcription causes downregulation of the protein-coding transcript isoform. Higher LUTI expression, enrichment of histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation, and changes in nucleosome position are the strongest predictors of LUTI-based transcriptional repression. We conclude that LUTIs downregulate gene expression in a manner that integrates translational repression, chromatin state changes, and the magnitude of LUTI expression.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Genomics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Genes, Reporter , Meiosis/genetics , Nanopore Sequencing , Nucleosomes/metabolism , Open Reading Frames/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Prophase/genetics , Protein Biosynthesis/genetics , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
3.
EMBO J ; 43(15): 3256-3286, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886580

ABSTRACT

Starvation in diploid budding yeast cells triggers a cell-fate program culminating in meiosis and spore formation. Transcriptional activation of early meiotic genes (EMGs) hinges on the master regulator Ime1, its DNA-binding partner Ume6, and GSK-3ß kinase Rim11. Phosphorylation of Ume6 by Rim11 is required for EMG activation. We report here that Rim11 functions as the central signal integrator for controlling Ume6 phosphorylation and EMG transcription. In nutrient-rich conditions, PKA suppresses Rim11 levels, while TORC1 retains Rim11 in the cytoplasm. Inhibition of PKA and TORC1 induces Rim11 expression and nuclear localization. Remarkably, nuclear Rim11 is required, but not sufficient, for Rim11-dependent Ume6 phosphorylation. In addition, Ime1 is an anchor protein enabling Ume6 phosphorylation by Rim11. Subsequently, Ume6-Ime1 coactivator complexes form and induce EMG transcription. Our results demonstrate how various signaling inputs (PKA/TORC1/Ime1) converge through Rim11 to regulate EMG expression and meiosis initiation. We posit that the signaling-regulatory network elucidated here generates robustness in cell-fate control.


Subject(s)
Meiosis , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Signal Transduction , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/metabolism , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/metabolism , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/genetics , Nuclear Proteins , Phosphorylation , Repressor Proteins , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics
4.
Cell ; 150(6): 1170-81, 2012 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22959267

ABSTRACT

The cell-fate decision leading to gametogenesis is essential for sexual reproduction. In S. cerevisiae, only diploid MATa/α but not haploid MATa or MATα cells undergo gametogenesis, known as sporulation. We find that transcription of two long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) mediates mating-type control of sporulation. In MATa or MATα haploids, expression of IME1, the central inducer of gametogenesis, is inhibited in cis by transcription of the lncRNA IRT1, located in the IME1 promoter. IRT1 transcription recruits the Set2 histone methyltransferase and the Set3 histone deacetylase complex to establish repressive chromatin at the IME1 promoter. Inhibiting expression of IRT1 and an antisense transcript that antagonizes the expression of the meiotic regulator IME4 allows cells expressing the haploid mating type to sporulate with kinetics that are indistinguishable from that of MATa/α diploids. Conversely, expression of the two lncRNAs abolishes sporulation in MATa/α diploids. Thus, transcription of two lncRNAs governs mating-type control of gametogenesis in yeast.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Genes, Mating Type, Fungal , RNA, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Gametogenesis , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Spores, Fungal , Transcription Factors/genetics
5.
Mol Cell ; 72(6): 942-954.e7, 2018 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30576656

ABSTRACT

Many active eukaryotic gene promoters exhibit divergent noncoding transcription, but the mechanisms restricting expression of these transcripts are not well understood. Here, we demonstrate how a sequence-specific transcription factor represses divergent noncoding transcription at highly expressed genes in yeast. We find that depletion of the transcription factor Rap1 induces noncoding transcription in a large fraction of Rap1-regulated gene promoters. Specifically, Rap1 prevents transcription initiation at cryptic promoters near its binding sites, which is uncoupled from transcription regulation in the protein-coding direction. We further provide evidence that Rap1 acts independently of previously described chromatin-based mechanisms to repress cryptic or divergent transcription. Finally, we show that divergent transcription in the absence of Rap1 is elicited by the RSC chromatin remodeler. We propose that a sequence-specific transcription factor limits access of basal transcription machinery to regulatory elements and adjacent sequences that act as divergent cryptic promoters, thereby providing directionality toward productive transcription.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , RNA, Fungal/metabolism , RNA, Untranslated/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Telomere-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Binding Sites , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Binding , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , RNA, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Untranslated/genetics , Ribosomal Proteins/genetics , Ribosomal Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Shelterin Complex , Telomere-Binding Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
6.
RNA ; 29(5): 705-712, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36759126

ABSTRACT

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a widely studied and abundant RNA modification. The m6A mark regulates the fate of RNAs in various ways, which in turn drives changes in cell physiology, development, and disease pathology. Over the last decade, numerous methods have been developed to map and quantify m6A sites genome-wide through deep sequencing. Alternatively, m6A levels can be quantified from a population of RNAs using techniques such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry or thin layer chromatography. However, many methods for quantifying m6A levels involve extensive protocols and specialized data analysis, and often only a few samples can be handled in a single experiment. Here, we developed a simple method for determining relative m6A levels in mRNA populations from various sources based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent-based assay (m6A-ELISA). We have optimized various steps of m6A-ELISA, such as sample preparation and the background signal resulting from the primary antibody. We validated the method using mRNA populations from budding yeast and mouse embryonic stem cells. The full protocol takes less than a day, requiring only 25 ng of mRNA. The m6A-ELISA protocol is quick, cost-effective, and scalable, making it a valuable tool for determining relative m6A levels in samples from various sources that could be adapted to detect other mRNA modifications.


Subject(s)
Antibodies , RNA , Animals , Mice , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
7.
Nat Methods ; 18(9): 1060-1067, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480159

ABSTRACT

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent modification of messenger RNA in mammals. To interrogate its functions and dynamics, there is a critical need to quantify m6A at three levels: site, gene and sample. Current approaches address these needs in a limited manner. Here we develop m6A-seq2, relying on multiplexed m6A-immunoprecipitation of barcoded and pooled samples. m6A-seq2 allows a big increase in throughput while reducing technical variability, requirements of input material and cost. m6A-seq2 is furthermore uniquely capable of providing sample-level relative quantitations of m6A, serving as an orthogonal alternative to mass spectrometry-based approaches. Finally, we develop a computational approach for gene-level quantitation of m6A. We demonstrate that using this metric, roughly 30% of the variability in RNA half life in mouse embryonic stem cells can be explained, establishing m6A as a main driver of RNA stability. m6A-seq2 thus provides an experimental and analytic framework for dissecting m6A-mediated regulation at three different levels.


Subject(s)
Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , RNA Stability/genetics , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods , Adenosine/analysis , Adenosine/genetics , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression , Half-Life , Meiosis , Methyltransferases/genetics , Methyltransferases/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/physiology , RNA Splicing Factors/genetics , RNA Splicing Factors/metabolism , Yeasts/genetics
8.
Yeast ; 41(4): 148-157, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238962

ABSTRACT

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a highly abundant and evolutionarily conserved messenger RNA (mRNA) modification. This modification is installed on RRACH motifs on mRNAs by a hetero-multimeric holoenzyme known as m6A methyltransferase complex (MTC). The m6A mark is then recognised by a group of conserved proteins known as the YTH domain family proteins which guide the mRNA for subsequent downstream processes that determine its fate. In yeast, m6A is installed on thousands of mRNAs during early meiosis by a conserved MTC and the m6A-modified mRNAs are read by the YTH domain-containing protein Mrb1/Pho92. In this review, we aim to delve into the recent advances in our understanding of the regulation and roles of m6A in yeast meiosis. We will discuss the potential functions of m6A in mRNA translation and decay, unravelling their significance in regulating gene expression. We propose that yeast serves as an exceptional model organism for the study of fundamental molecular mechanisms related to the function and regulation of m6A-modified mRNAs. The insights gained from yeast research not only expand our knowledge of mRNA modifications and their molecular roles but also offer valuable insights into the broader landscape of eukaryotic posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression.


Subject(s)
Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Saccharomycetales , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomycetales/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Gene Expression
9.
Genes Dev ; 27(19): 2147-63, 2013 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24115771

ABSTRACT

Production of haploid gametes from diploid progenitor cells is mediated by a specialized cell division, meiosis, where two divisions, meiosis I and II, follow a single S phase. Errors in progression from meiosis I to meiosis II lead to aneuploid and polyploid gametes, but the regulatory mechanisms controlling this transition are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the conserved kinase Ime2 regulates the timing and order of the meiotic divisions by controlling translation. Ime2 coordinates translational activation of a cluster of genes at the meiosis I-meiosis II transition, including the critical determinant of the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern CLB3. We further show that Ime2 mediates translational control through the meiosis-specific RNA-binding protein Rim4. Rim4 inhibits translation of CLB3 during meiosis I by interacting with the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of CLB3. At the onset of meiosis II, Ime2 kinase activity rises and triggers a decrease in Rim4 protein levels, thereby alleviating translational repression. Our results elucidate a novel developmentally regulated translational control pathway that establishes the meiotic chromosome segregation pattern.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Meiosis/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , 5' Untranslated Regions/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Multigene Family/genetics , Protein Binding , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
10.
PLoS Genet ; 12(6): e1006075, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27272508

ABSTRACT

Cell fate choices are tightly controlled by the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic signals, and gene regulatory networks. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the decision to enter into gametogenesis or sporulation is dictated by mating type and nutrient availability. These signals regulate the expression of the master regulator of gametogenesis, IME1. Here we describe how nutrients control IME1 expression. We find that protein kinase A (PKA) and target of rapamycin complex I (TORC1) signalling mediate nutrient regulation of IME1 expression. Inhibiting both pathways is sufficient to induce IME1 expression and complete sporulation in nutrient-rich conditions. Our ability to induce sporulation under nutrient rich conditions allowed us to show that respiration and fermentation are interchangeable energy sources for IME1 transcription. Furthermore, we find that TORC1 can both promote and inhibit gametogenesis. Down-regulation of TORC1 is required to activate IME1. However, complete inactivation of TORC1 inhibits IME1 induction, indicating that an intermediate level of TORC1 signalling is required for entry into sporulation. Finally, we show that the transcriptional repressor Tup1 binds and represses the IME1 promoter when nutrients are ample, but is released from the IME1 promoter when both PKA and TORC1 are inhibited. Collectively our data demonstrate that nutrient control of entry into sporulation is mediated by a combination of energy availability, TORC1 and PKA activities that converge on the IME1 promoter.


Subject(s)
Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/genetics , Gametogenesis/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Spores, Fungal/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Signal Transduction/genetics , Transcription Factors/antagonists & inhibitors
11.
Curr Genet ; 63(2): 325-329, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27520925

ABSTRACT

Cell fate decisions are controlled by multiple cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. In budding yeast, the decision to enter gametogenesis or sporulation is dictated by nutrient availability and mating type. Recently, we showed that in diploid cells harbouring opposite mating types (MATa and MATα), the protein kinase A (PKA) and target of rapamycin complex I (TORC1) signalling pathways integrate at the promoter of the master regulatory transcription factor IME1 to control sporulation via nutrient availability (Weidberg, et al. 2016). In cells with a single mating type (MATa or MATα), however, IME1 is repressed by transcription through the IME1 promoter of a long non-coding RNA called IRT1, which prevents this cell type from undergoing sporulation. Here, we investigated the role of nutrient signalling in mating-type control of IME1. We find that expression of IRT1, like IME1 itself, depends on nutrient availability and the activities of PKA and TORC1. IRT1 transcription is repressed when nutrients are ample and TORC1 and PKA are active. In contrast, inhibition of PKA and TORC1 is sufficient to recruit Rme1 to the IRT1 promoter and induce IRT1-mediated repression of IME1. Finally, we provide evidence that IRT1 and IME1 are co-repressed by the Tup1-Cyc8 complex when nutrients are ample. Thus, in cells with a single mating-type nutrient availability regulates mating-type repression of IME1 and sporulation. Our results indicate that there is a hierarchy between nutrient and mating-type signals in controlling the decision to enter sporulation.


Subject(s)
Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/genetics , Genes, Mating Type, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Models, Genetic , Mutation , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Signal Transduction/genetics , Spores, Fungal/genetics , Spores, Fungal/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
12.
Elife ; 122023 07 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490041

ABSTRACT

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant mRNA modification, is deposited in mammals/insects/plants by m6A methyltransferase complexes (MTC) comprising a catalytic subunit and at least five additional proteins. The yeast MTC is critical for meiosis and was known to comprise three proteins, of which two were conserved. We uncover three novel MTC components (Kar4/Ygl036w-Vir1/Dyn2). All MTC subunits, except for Dyn2, are essential for m6A deposition and have corresponding mammalian MTC orthologues. Unlike the mammalian bipartite MTC, the yeast MTC is unipartite, yet multifunctional. The mRNA interacting module, comprising Ime4, Mum2, Vir1, and Kar4, exerts the MTC's m6A-independent function, while Slz1 enables the MTC catalytic function in m6A deposition. Both functions are critical for meiotic progression. Kar4 also has a mechanistically separate role from the MTC during mating. The yeast MTC constituents play distinguishable m6A-dependent, MTC-dependent, and MTC-independent functions, highlighting their complexity and paving the path towards dissecting multi-layered MTC functions in mammals.


Subject(s)
Yeasts , Gene Expression , Yeasts/genetics , Methylation , RNA, Messenger , Meiosis
13.
STAR Protoc ; 3(1): 101145, 2022 03 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169715

ABSTRACT

LUTIs (Long Undecoded Transcript Isoforms) are 5'-extended and poorly translated mRNAs that can downregulate transcription from promoters more proximal to a gene's coding sequence (CDS). In this protocol, polyA RNA is extracted from budding yeast cells undergoing highly synchronized meiosis. Using a combination of long-read direct RNA sequencing and transcript leader sequencing (TL-seq), meiosis-specific LUTIs are systematically identified. Following identification, TL-seq is used to quantify the abundance of both LUTI and the more canonical gene-proximal (PROX) transcripts. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Tresenrider et al. (2021).


Subject(s)
Saccharomycetales , Protein Isoforms/genetics , RNA , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Saccharomycetales/genetics , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
14.
Life Sci Alliance ; 5(12)2022 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114005

ABSTRACT

The directionality of gene promoters-the ratio of protein-coding over divergent noncoding transcription-is highly variable. How promoter directionality is controlled remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the chromatin remodelling complex RSC and general regulatory factors (GRFs) dictate promoter directionality by attenuating divergent transcription relative to protein-coding transcription. At gene promoters that are highly directional, depletion of RSC leads to a relative increase in divergent noncoding transcription and thus to a decrease in promoter directionality. We find that RSC has a modest effect on nucleosome positioning upstream in promoters at the sites of divergent transcription. These promoters are also enriched for the binding of GRFs such as Reb1 and Abf1. Ectopic targeting of divergent transcription initiation sites with GRFs or the dCas9 DNA-binding protein suppresses divergent transcription. Our data suggest that RSC and GRFs play a pervasive role in limiting divergent transcription relative to coding direction transcription. We propose that any DNA-binding factor, when stably associated with cryptic transcription start sites, forms a barrier which represses divergent transcription, thereby promoting promoter directionality.


Subject(s)
Nucleosomes , Transcription, Genetic , DNA , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Nucleosomes/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription, Genetic/genetics
15.
Elife ; 112022 11 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36422864

ABSTRACT

N6- methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification impacts mRNA fate primarily via reader proteins, which dictate processes in development, stress, and disease. Yet little is known about m6A function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which occurs solely during early meiosis. Here, we perform a multifaceted analysis of the m6A reader protein Pho92/Mrb1. Cross-linking immunoprecipitation analysis reveals that Pho92 associates with the 3'end of meiotic mRNAs in both an m6A-dependent and independent manner. Within cells, Pho92 transitions from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and associates with translating ribosomes. In the nucleus Pho92 associates with target loci through its interaction with transcriptional elongator Paf1C. Functionally, we show that Pho92 promotes and links protein synthesis to mRNA decay. As such, the Pho92-mediated m6A-mRNA decay is contingent on active translation and the CCR4-NOT complex. We propose that the m6A reader Pho92 is loaded co-transcriptionally to facilitate protein synthesis and subsequent decay of m6A modified transcripts, and thereby promotes meiosis.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA Stability
16.
Genome Biol ; 22(1): 34, 2021 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The start and end sites of messenger RNAs (TSSs and TESs) are highly regulated, often in a cell-type-specific manner. Yet the contribution of transcript diversity in regulating gene expression remains largely elusive. We perform an integrative analysis of multiple highly synchronized cell-fate transitions and quantitative genomic techniques in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify regulatory functions associated with transcribing alternative isoforms. RESULTS: Cell-fate transitions feature widespread elevated expression of alternative TSS and, to a lesser degree, TES usage. These dynamically regulated alternative TSSs are located mostly upstream of canonical TSSs, but also within gene bodies possibly encoding for protein isoforms. Increased upstream alternative TSS usage is linked to various effects on canonical TSS levels, which range from co-activation to repression. We identified two key features linked to these outcomes: an interplay between alternative and canonical promoter strengths, and distance between alternative and canonical TSSs. These two regulatory properties give a plausible explanation of how locally transcribed alternative TSSs control gene transcription. Additionally, we find that specific chromatin modifiers Set2, Set3, and FACT play an important role in mediating gene repression via alternative TSSs, further supporting that the act of upstream transcription drives the local changes in gene transcription. CONCLUSIONS: The integrative analysis of multiple cell-fate transitions suggests the presence of a regulatory control system of alternative TSSs that is important for dynamic tuning of gene expression. Our work provides a framework for understanding how TSS heterogeneity governs eukaryotic gene expression, particularly during cell-fate changes.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Chromatin , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Isoforms/genetics , RNA, Messenger , Transcription Factors , Transcriptome
17.
Cell Rep ; 34(3): 108643, 2021 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33472063

ABSTRACT

Transcription through noncoding regions of the genome is pervasive. How these transcription events regulate gene expression remains poorly understood. Here, we report that, in S. cerevisiae, the levels of transcription through a noncoding region, IRT2, located upstream in the promoter of the inducer of meiosis, IME1, regulate opposing chromatin and transcription states. At low levels, the act of IRT2 transcription promotes histone exchange, delivering acetylated histone H3 lysine 56 to chromatin locally. The subsequent open chromatin state directs transcription factor recruitment and induces downstream transcription to repress the IME1 promoter and meiotic entry. Conversely, increasing transcription turns IRT2 into a repressor by promoting transcription-coupled chromatin assembly. The two opposing functions of IRT2 transcription shape a regulatory circuit, which ensures a robust cell-type-specific control of IME1 expression and yeast meiosis. Our data illustrate how intergenic transcription levels are key to controlling local chromatin state, gene expression, and cell fate outcomes.


Subject(s)
RNA, Untranslated/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
18.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 7198, 2021 12 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34893601

ABSTRACT

RNA molecules undergo a vast array of chemical post-transcriptional modifications (PTMs) that can affect their structure and interaction properties. In recent years, a growing number of PTMs have been successfully mapped to the transcriptome using experimental approaches relying on high-throughput sequencing. Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA sequencing has been shown to be sensitive to RNA modifications. We developed and validated Nanocompore, a robust analytical framework that identifies modifications from these data. Our strategy compares an RNA sample of interest against a non-modified control sample, not requiring a training set and allowing the use of replicates. We show that Nanocompore can detect different RNA modifications with position accuracy in vitro, and we apply it to profile m6A in vivo in yeast and human RNAs, as well as in targeted non-coding RNAs. We confirm our results with orthogonal methods and provide novel insights on the co-occurrence of multiple modified residues on individual RNA molecules.


Subject(s)
Nanopore Sequencing/methods , Nanopores , RNA/metabolism , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods , Base Sequence , Computational Biology , Gene Expression Profiling , Genetic Techniques , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , RNA/isolation & purification , RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional , Software , Transcriptome
19.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 36(4): e21, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18180247

ABSTRACT

Chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with DNA microarrays (ChIP-chip) is a powerful technique to detect in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Due to low yields, ChIP assays of transcription factors generally require amplification of immunoprecipitated genomic DNA. Here, we present an adapted linear amplification method that involves two rounds of T7 RNA polymerase amplification (double-T7). Using this we could successfully amplify as little as 0.4 ng of ChIP DNA to sufficient amounts for microarray analysis. In addition, we compared the double-T7 method to the ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR) method in a ChIP-chip of the yeast transcription factor Gsm1p. The double-T7 protocol showed lower noise levels and stronger binding signals compared to LM-PCR. Both LM-PCR and double-T7 identified strongly bound genomic regions, but the double-T7 method increased sensitivity and specificity to allow detection of weaker binding sites.


Subject(s)
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation/methods , DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Viral Proteins , Binding Sites , Genomics/methods , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA/analysis , RNA/chemistry , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
20.
Nat Commun ; 11(1): 2271, 2020 05 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32385261

ABSTRACT

Intrinsic signals and external cues from the environment drive cell fate decisions. In budding yeast, the decision to enter meiosis is controlled by nutrient and mating-type signals that regulate expression of the master transcription factor for meiotic entry, IME1. How nutrient signals control IME1 expression remains poorly understood. Here, we show that IME1 transcription is regulated by multiple sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) that mediate association of Tup1-Cyc8 co-repressor to its promoter. We find that at least eight TFs bind the IME1 promoter when nutrients are ample. Remarkably, association of these TFs is highly regulated by different nutrient cues. Mutant cells lacking three TFs (Sok2/Phd1/Yap6) displayed reduced Tup1-Cyc8 association, increased IME1 expression, and earlier onset of meiosis. Our data demonstrate that the promoter of a master regulator is primed for rapid activation while repression by multiple TFs mediating Tup1-Cyc8 recruitment dictates the fate decision to enter meiosis.


Subject(s)
Cell Lineage/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Meiosis/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , Protein Binding , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL