Which inflamed tissues explain a positive metatarsophalangeal squeeze test? A large imaging study to clarify a common diagnostic procedure.

OBJECTIVES: The squeeze test of MTP joints is frequently used because it is easy and cheap. It is traditionally perceived as a test for synovitis. Besides classic intra-articular synovitis, also tenosynovitis and intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) represent synovial inflammation, albeit juxta-articularly located. Both are frequently present in RA and occasionally in other arthritides. Therefore we hypothesized that tenosynovitis and IMB contribute to a positive MTP squeeze test. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 192 early arthritis patients and 693 clinically suspect arthralgia patients underwent the MTP squeeze test and forefoot MRI at first presentation. MRI measurements in age-matched healthy controls were used to define positivity for synovitis, tenosynovitis and IMB. Logistic regression was used. RESULTS: In early arthritis patients, synovitis [odds ratio (OR) 4.8 (95% CI 2.5, 9.5)], tenosynovitis [2.4 (1.2, 4.7)] and IMB [1.7 (1.2, 2.6)] associated with MTP squeeze test positivity. Synovitis [OR 3.2 (95% CI 1.4, 7.2)] and IMB [3.9 (1.7, 8.8)] remained associated in multivariable analyses. Of patients with a positive MTP squeeze test, 79% had synovitis or IMB: 12% synovitis, 15% IMB and 52% both synovitis and IMB. In clinically suspect arthralgia patients, subclinical synovitis [OR 3.0 (95% CI 2.0, 4.7)], tenosynovitis [2.7 (1.6, 4.6)] and IMB [1.7 (1.2, 2.6)] associated with MTP squeeze test positivity, with the strongest association for synovitis in multivariable analysis. Of positive MTP squeeze tests, 39% had synovitis or IMB (10% synovitis, 15% IMB and 13% both synovitis and IMB). CONCLUSION: Besides synovitis, IMB contributes to pain upon compression in early arthritis, presumably due to its location between MTP joints. This is the first evidence showing that MTP squeeze test positivity is not only explained by intra- but also juxta-articular inflammation.

Effects of psychosocial factors on monitoring treatment effect in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients over time: response data from the tREACH study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether, apart from effects of patient- and disease-related factors, psychosocial factors have additional effects on disease activity; and which factors are most influential during the first year of treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: The study assessed 15 month follow-up data from patients in tREACH, a randomized clinical trial comparing initial triple disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy to methotrexate monotherapy, with glucocorticoid bridging in both groups. Patients were evaluated every 3 months and treated to target. Associations between Disease Activity Score (DAS) at 3, 9, and 15 months and psychosocial factors (anxiety, depression, fatigue, and coping with pain) at the previous visit were assessed by multivariable linear regression correcting for demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors. RESULTS: At 3, 9, and 15 months of follow-up, 265, 251, and 162 patients, respectively, were available for analysis. Baseline anxiety and coping with pain were associated with DAS at 3 months; coping with pain at 6 months was associated with DAS at 9 months, and fatigue at 12 months with DAS at 15 months. Psychosocial factors were moderately correlated. Effects on DAS were mainly due to tender joint count and global health. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors have additional effects on DAS throughout the first year of treatment in early RA. A change was observed from anxiety and coping with pain at baseline being associated with subsequent DAS towards fatigue being associated with subsequent DAS at 12 months. Owing to the explorative nature of this study, more research is needed to confirm this pattern.

Tapering conventional synthetic DMARDs in patients with early arthritis in sustained remission: 2-year follow-up of the tREACH trial.

OBJECTIVES: With early and intensive treatment many patients with early RA attain remission. Aims were to investigate (1) the frequency and time to sustained remission and subsequent tapering in patients initially treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug ((cs)DMARD) strategies and (2) the frequency and time to flare and regained remission in patients tapering csDMARDs and biological (b)DMARDs during 2 years of follow-up. METHODS: Two-year follow-up data from the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH) cohort were used. Patients were randomised to initial treatment with triple DMARD therapy (iTDT) with glucocorticoid (GC) bridging or methotrexate monotherapy (iMM) with GC bridging. Patients were evaluated every 3 months. In case Disease Activity Score (DAS) was >2.4 treatment was switched to a TNF-blocker. In case DAS<1.6 at 2 consecutive time points, tapering was initiated according to protocol. Outcomes were rates of sustained remission (DAS<1.6 at 2 consecutive time points), flare (medication increase after tapering) and remission after flare (DAS<1.6). Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: During 2 years of follow-up, sustained remission was achieved at least once by 159 (57%) of patients, of whom 118 and 23 patients initiated tapering of csDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively. Thirty-four patients achieved drug-free remission. Flare rates were 41% and 37% and within 1 year, respectively. After flare, 65% of patients tapering csDMARDs re-achieved remission within 6 months after treatment intensification. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of initial treatment strategy, 57% of patients achieved sustained remission during 2 years of follow-up. Flare rates were 41% and 37% within 12 months in patients tapering csDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN26791028; Post-results.

Adherence to cardiovascular prevention strategies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent national and international guidelines suggest strict treatment of CVD risk factors in RA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the self-reported adherence to CV prevention strategies in patients with RA. METHOD: RA patients visiting an outpatient clinic for strict CVD risk management received a validated questionnaire to evaluate adherence to CV prevention strategies. Strict treatment targets were defined and lifestyle recommendations were given following a prespecified protocol. CVD risk was assessed using the SCORE algorithm. RESULTS: In total, 111 questionnaires were returned (response rate of 82%). A high 10-year CVD risk (≥ 20%) was present in 53%, but only 3% thought they had an increased CVD risk. A total of 53% of patients reported that they 'follow the doctors' suggestions exactly' and 75% reported finding it 'easy to follow the suggestions'. Of the 69% of patients who were prescribed lipid- and/or blood pressure-lowering drugs, 90% reported taking all prescribed tablets. The advice to follow a diet was given to 42%, of whom 68% said they followed the advised diet. Physical exercise was advised to 67%, of whom 62% said they performed specific physical exercise on at least 3 days a week. The adherence to lifestyle recommendations was not significantly different across the CVD risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients tend to underestimate their CVD risk. The self-reported adherence of RA patients to CVD risk management was high concerning pharmaceutical interventions and moderate in the case of lifestyle interventions.

Randomised comparison of initial triple DMARD therapy with methotrexate monotherapy in combination with low-dose glucocorticoid bridging therapy; 1-year data of the tREACH trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 1-year clinical efficacy of (1) initial triple disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy (iTDT) with initial methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy (iMM) and (2) different glucocorticoid (GC) bridging therapies: oral versus a single intramuscular injection in early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomised clinical trial patients were randomised into three arms: (A) iTDT (methotrexate+sulfasalazine+hydroxychloroquine) with GCs intramuscularly; (B) iTDT with an oral GC tapering scheme and (C) MTX with oral GCs similar to B. Primary outcomes were (1) area under the curve (AUC) of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Disease Activity Score (DAS) and (2) the proportion of patients with radiographic progression. RESULTS: 281 patients were randomly assigned to arms A (n=91), B (n=93) or C (n=97). The AUC DAS and HAQ were respectively -2.39 (95% CI -4.77 to -0.00) and -1.67 (95% CI -3.35 to 0.02) lower in patients receiving iTDT than in those receiving iMM. After 3 months, treatment failure occurred less often in the iTDT group, resulting in 40% fewer treatment intensifications. The difference in treatment intensifications between the arms required to maintain the predefined treatment goal remained over time. No differences were seen between the two GC bridging therapies. Respectively 21%, 24% and 23% of patients in arms A, B and C had radiographic progression after 1 year. Patients receiving iTDT had more adjustments of their medication owing to adverse events than those receiving iMM. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment goals are attained more quickly and maintained with fewer treatment intensifications with iTDT than with iMM. However, no difference in radiographic progression is seen. Both GC bridging therapies are equally effective and, therefore, both can be used. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN26791028.

Association of low baseline levels of erythrocyte folate with treatment nonresponse at three months in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether baseline concentrations of one-carbon metabolism biomarkers are associated with treatment nonresponse and adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: A prospective derivation cohort (n = 285) and validation cohort (n = 102) of RA patients receiving MTX were studied. Concentrations of plasma homocysteine, serum vitamin B12 , serum folate, erythrocyte vitamin B6 , and erythrocyte folate were determined at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Nonresponse after 3 months was assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Adverse events at 3 months were assessed using biochemical parameters and health status questionnaires. Analyses were corrected for baseline DAS28, age, sex, MTX dose, comedications, and presence of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the mean DAS28 scores at baseline and 3 months were 4.94 and 3.12, respectively, and 78% of patients experienced adverse events. This was similar between the 2 cohorts, despite a lower MTX dose in the validation cohort. Patients with lower levels of erythrocyte folate at baseline had a higher DAS28 at 3 months in both the derivation cohort (ß = -0.15, P = 0.037) and the validation cohort (ß = -0.20, P = 0.048). In line with these results, lower baseline erythrocyte folate levels were linearly associated with a 3-month DAS28 of >3.2 in both cohorts (derivation cohort, P = 0.049; validation cohort, P = 0.021) and with nonresponse according to the EULAR criteria (derivation cohort, P = 0.066; validation cohort, P = 0.027). None of the other biomarkers (levels at baseline or changes over 3 months) were associated with the DAS28 or treatment nonresponse. Baseline levels of the biomarkers and changes in levels after 3 months were not associated with incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: A low baseline concentration of erythrocyte folate is associated with high disease activity and nonresponse at 3 months after the start of MTX treatment and could be used in prediction models for MTX outcome. None of the investigated one-carbon metabolism biomarkers were associated with incidence of adverse events at 3 months.

Induction therapy with a combination of DMARDs is better than methotrexate monotherapy: first results of the tREACH trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective induction disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), second to compare one single dose of intramuscular glucocorticoids (GCs) with daily oral GCs during the induction phase. METHODS: The 3-month data of a single-blinded clinical trial in patients with recent-onset arthritis (tREACH) were used. Patients were included who had a high probability (>70%) of progressing to persistent arthritis, based on the prediction model of Visser. Patients were randomised into three induction therapy strategies: (A) combination therapy (methotrexate (MTX) + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine) with GCs intramuscularly; (B) combination therapy with an oral GC tapering scheme and (C) MTX with oral GCs similar to B. A total of 281 patients were randomly assigned to strategy (A) (n=91), (B) (n=93) or (C) (n=97). RESULTS: The Disease Activity Score (DAS) after 3 months was lower in patients receiving initial combination therapy than in those receiving MTX monotherapy (0.39 (0.67 to 0.11, 95% CI)). DAS did not differ between the different GC bridging treatments. After 3 months 50% fewer biological agents were prescribed in the combination therapy groups. Although the proportion of patients with medication adjustments differed significantly between the treatment arms, no differences were seen in these adjustments due to adverse events after stratification for drug. CONCLUSION: Triple DMARD induction therapy is better than MTX monotherapy in early RA. Furthermore, no differences were seen in medication adjustments due to adverse events after stratification for drug. Intramuscular and oral GCs are equally effective as bridging treatments and both can be used.

Clinical and radiological efficacy of initial vs delayed treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of initial vs delayed treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (IFX) in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In a post hoc analysis of the BeSt study (for Behandel Stratagieen, Dutch for treatment strategies), 117 patients who started initial MTX+IFX were compared with 67 patients who started MTX+IFX treatment after failing (disease activity score (DAS)>2.4; median delay to IFX: 13 months) on > or =3 traditional DMARDs. If the DAS remained >2.4, the protocol dictated IFX dose increases to 6, 7.5 and 10 mg/kg. In case of a DAS < or =2.4 for > or =6 months, IFX was tapered and finally stopped. We aimed to correct for allocation bias using propensity scores. Functional ability was measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), radiological progression by Sharp/van der Heijde scoring (SHS). RESULTS: Baseline differences between the initial and delayed groups were no longer significant after propensity score adjustment. At 3 years after baseline, patients treated with initial MTX+IFX experienced more improvement in HAQ over time and were less likely to have SHS progression than patients treated with delayed MTX+IFX (p = 0.034). At 2 years after IFX initiation, more patients in the initial group compared with the delayed group could discontinue IFX after a good response (56% vs 29%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this post hoc analysis suggest that using MTX+IFX as initial treatment for patients with recent onset RA is more effective than reserving MTX+IFX for patients who failed on traditional DMARDs, with more HAQ improvement over time, more IFX discontinuation and less progression of joint damage.

Properdin factor B and complement factor C4 allotypes in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a follow-up study.

The association between allotypes of properdin factor B (Bf), the fourth component of complement (C4A and C4B), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was investigated in a well-characterized cohort of RA patients who were followed from an early phase of the disease for a mean duration of 6 years. The frequencies of probable heterozygous C4AQ0 and of C4A3 were lower in RA patients compared to controls, irrespective of the presence of DR4 [relative risk (RR): 0.52 and 0.49, respectively, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.34-0.80 and 0.29-0.82]. The frequency of C4A4 was higher in RA patients compared to controls (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.03-3.35), especially in DR4 positive RA patients compared to DR4 positive controls (RR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.07-6.25), indicating a positive association of this allotype with RA additional to DR4. Bf and C4B allotypes were comparable in RA patients and controls. We did not find significant differences in Bf and C4 allotype frequencies in RA patients subdivided according to severity of the disease into a mild group and a progressive group. Because of inconsistent results in all studies on Bf and C4 allotypes, we conclude that C4 and Bf allotypes do not seem to have an important independent effect on determining disease susceptibility.

Disseminated histoplasmosis. Typical presentation with involvement of the adrenal glands.

A 67-yr-old Indonesian patient with disseminated histoplasmosis is described. He had general malaise and fever for 6 months; an oral ulcer, bilateral adrenal gland enlargement and partial adrenal insufficiency were found. An adrenal aspirate contained Histoplasma capsulatum. The literature on adrenal involvement in disseminated histoplasmosis is reviewed and it is concluded that bilateral enlargement, demonstrated by sonography or computed tomography, in a patient with general malaise is an important clue to the diagnosis.

Prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis.

To determine prognostic factors that predict the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from an early phase of the disease, we reviewed publications on possible prognostic factors. We excluded studies with patients with long standing disease, studies with a followup less than one year, studies providing insufficient methodological information, and studies using noninformative outcome measures. We identified individual factors associated with worse outcome: presence of serum rheumatoid factor (RF), HLA-DR4, signs of high disease activity [number of swollen or tender joints, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)], rheumatoid nodules, radiological abnormalities, poor grip strength, and poor functional status. The accuracy of prediction of these individual factors is low. Therefore, in several studies, combinations of entry variables were investigated for accuracy in predicting the severity of radiological abnormalities. IgM RF in combination with radiographic damage at onset of RA and either clinical measures of disease activity and/or laboratory measures such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or CRP and/or a functional ability score, and/or HLA-DR4 could predict radiological abnormalities with an accuracy of 70-80%. Further research should be directed to find more specific disease markers and to validate an internationally accepted combination of prognostic criteria.

Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: how to lower the risk?

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) carry an excess risk for cardiovascular disease, which is comparable to the risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mechanisms involved are partly related to traditional cardiovascular risk factors, disease-associated inflammation and undertreatment of traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Since atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease, the auto-immune mediated inflammation observed in RA patients contributes to increased endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and activation and vascular migration of leukocytes. This concept is underscored by the CVD risk reduction that is seen by anti-inflammatory disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs such as methotrexate and TNFα inhibitors. The evidence for underdiagnosis and undertreatment of traditional CVD risk factors in RA strengthens the potential benefit of structured CVD risk management in these patients. Current cardiovascular guidelines recommend screening and treatment of CVD risk factors in RA patients, without well defined treatment targets. At present, there is a lack of scientific evidence to establish treatment targets for CVD risk factors in RA. Therefore, expanding research regarding screening and treatment of traditional CVD risk factors in RA patients is needed.

Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial comparing four different treatment strategies in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of 4 different treatment strategies for recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on 2-year patient-reported outcomes, including functioning and quality of life. METHODS: A total of 508 patients with recent-onset RA were randomly assigned to 1) sequential monotherapy, 2) step-up combination therapy, both starting with methotrexate, 3) initial combination therapy, including a tapered high-dose prednisone, or 4) initial combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab. Treatment was adjusted every 3 months if the Disease Activity Score (DAS) remained >2.4. The McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and scores for pain, global health, and disease activity measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were compared between groups at baseline and every 3 months thereafter for 2 years. RESULTS: After 2 years, all patient-reported outcomes had improved significantly from baseline, irrespective of the treatment strategy. SF-36 subscale scores approached population norms for 3 physical components, and achieved population norms (P > 0.05) for bodily pain and 4 mental components. Improvement in functioning, VAS scores, and physical items of the SF-36 occurred significantly earlier in patients treated with initial combination therapies (all comparisons after 3 months: overall P < 0.001; P < 0.05 for groups 1 and 2 versus groups 3 and 4). CONCLUSION: All 4 DAS-driven treatment strategies resulted in substantial improvements in functional ability, quality of life, and self-assessed VAS scores after 2 years. Initial combination therapy led to significantly faster improvement in all patient-reported measures.

Implementation of a physical activity intervention for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a case study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential facilitators and barriers regarding the implementation on a larger scale of an internet-based physical activity intervention which had previously proved to be effective in a randomized, controlled trial concerning sedentary patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Assuming a central delivery of the intervention by two trained physical therapists in four regions in the Netherlands, the following activities were employed: the recruitment of potential participants (RA patients), the acquisition of cooperation from referring rheumatologists and the acquisition of reimbursement from regional health insurance companies. Evaluation was done by means of the Reach, Evaluation, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, of which the following three dimensions were considered relevant: Reach (the number of potential participants), Adoption (readiness for adopting the programme in real life among rheumatologists) and Implementation (the extent to which the intervention could be delivered as intended). Evaluation measures comprised a postal survey among 927 patients with RA in two regions, a telephone survey among rheumatology centres in four regions and consultations with five regional health insurance companies. RESULTS: Seventy-six out of 461 responding RA patients (20%) met the original study inclusion criteria (being sedentary and having access to the internet) and were interested in participation. However, the potential costs of the purchase of a bicycle ergometer and the interference with patients' current physical therapy were obstacles for eligible patients actually to participate. Rheumatologists in four out of five rheumatology centres were willing to participate. All five health insurance companies were willing to reimburse the guidance and feedback by the physical therapist, and the costs of the internet site (estimated costs 271 euro [203 pound] per patient per year), but not the bicycle ergometer (estimated costs 350 euro [262 pound]), provided that current physical therapy would be discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators for the implementation of an internet-based physical activity intervention were: (i) a considerable proportion of RA patients were eligible and interested in the programme; (ii) the majority of rheumatologists were willing to refer patients; and (iii) health insurance companies were willing partially to reimburse the intervention. Barriers were the additional costs for patients and their unwillingness to discontinue current physical therapy. These findings underscore the need for additional research into barriers to participation in physical activity interventions among patients with RA, and in reimbursement strategies in particular.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): A randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Several treatment strategies have proven value in the amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the optimal strategy for preventing long-term joint damage and functional decline is unclear. We undertook this study to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of 4 different treatment strategies, with intense monitoring in all patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 508 patients were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment strategies: sequential disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with tapered high-dose prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab (group 4). Treatment adjustments were made every 3 months in an effort to obtain low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 44 joints of < or =2.4). RESULTS: Initial combination therapy including either prednisone (group 3) or infliximab (group 4) resulted in earlier functional improvement than did sequential monotherapy (group 1) and step-up combination therapy (group 2), with mean scores at 3 months on the Dutch version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (D-HAQ) of 1.0 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.6 in groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.001). After 1 year, mean D-HAQ scores were 0.7 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.5 in groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.009). The median increases in total Sharp/Van der Heijde radiographic joint score were 2.0, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5 in groups 1-4, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of adverse events and withdrawals between the groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with early RA, initial combination therapy including either prednisone or infliximab resulted in earlier functional improvement and less radiographic damage after 1 year than did sequential monotherapy or step-up combination therapy.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Several treatment strategies have proven value in the amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the optimal strategy for preventing long-term joint damage and functional decline is unclear. We undertook this study to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of 4 different treatment strategies, with intense monitoring in all patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 508 patients were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment strategies: sequential disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with tapered high-dose prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab (group 4). Treatment adjustments were made every 3 months in an effort to obtain low disease activity (a Disease Activity Score in 44 joints of < or =2.4). RESULTS: Initial combination therapy including either prednisone (group 3) or infliximab (group 4) resulted in earlier functional improvement than did sequential monotherapy (group 1) and step-up combination therapy (group 2), with mean scores at 3 months on the Dutch version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (D-HAQ) of 1.0 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.6 in groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.001). After 1 year, mean D-HAQ scores were 0.7 in groups 1 and 2 and 0.5 in groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.009). The median increases in total Sharp/Van der Heijde radiographic joint score were 2.0, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5 in groups 1-4, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of adverse events and withdrawals between the groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with early RA, initial combination therapy including either prednisone or infliximab resulted in earlier functional improvement and less radiographic damage after 1 year than did sequential monotherapy or step-up combination therapy.

Oral contraception and its possible protection against rheumatoid arthritis.

PIP: As of February 1991, epidemiologic studies had still not conclusively identified risk factors of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the 1970s, the Royal College of General Practitioners conducted a study which indicated that oral contraceptive (OC) use may protect against RA. Scientists have since conducted several other studies, but they have not been able to provide clear answers. OC use caused a fall in RA by about 50% in 7 studies. The results of 1 study was inconclusive. Methodological problems existed for the earliest studies. Even recent studies without these problems conflict with each other. In the late 1980s, 2 meta analyses pooled reported relative risks (RR) of RA for ever users of OCs and found a slight protective effect. 1 analysis separated prior research findings into those from the US and those from Europe. The other analysis pooled the risk ratios for hospital based studies and population based studies separately. Since many studies were hospital based, scientists explained the divergence on patient selection. The preliminary results of a methodological impressive study in Seattle, Washington showed a significant reduction RA risk in current users of OCs, but only slight reduction in past OC users. All of these findings posed 2 possible explanations on how OCs protect against RA: they may prevent progression of mild to severe RA by altering the disease process or they only prevent the development of progressive destructive RA. The Royal College later analyzed recent data and found that the RR of RA among current OC users approximates the RR among former users. The many inconsistencies between these studies suggests that OC use may be a marker for some other casual factor which differs among subjects.^ieng

Diminished incidence of severe rheumatoid arthritis associated with oral contraceptive use.

It has been suggested that the negative association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and oral contraceptive (OC) use might be limited to the more severe forms of RA. To investigate this further, we studied 121 consecutive female patients with definite RA, 52 female patients with probable RA, and 378 female controls. All patients had RA symptoms of recent onset. After a mean followup period of 6 years, patients with definite RA were classified as having either a severe disease course (n = 76) or a mild disease course (n = 45). The negative association between OC use prior to the onset of RA symptoms and the development of RA was limited to those patients with definite RA who had a severe disease course. We therefore conclude that OC use prior to the onset of RA symptoms is only associated with a reduction in the incidence of severe RA. This may explain the divergent results of previous studies.

Evaluation of microcytosis using serum ferritin and red blood cell distribution width.

Out of 104 patients with microcytosis (MCV less than 80 fl), 69% had an iron deficiency, 21% a chronic disease and 10% hemoglobinopathy or thalassemia trait. The absence of bone marrow iron stores or the response to iron supplementation were used to establish the diagnosis iron deficiency. On the basis of sensitivity (90%) and specificity (100%), the serum ferritin concentration is more suitable for assessment of iron deficiency than the serum iron concentration, the total iron-binding capacity or the percentual saturation of transferrin. The red cell distribution width (RDW) is the parameter with the highest sensitivity for iron deficiency (94%). An RDW value within the reference interval can be used to exclude iron deficiency in those cases in which the serum ferritin concentration does not accurately reflect the iron stores owing to severe tissue damage, as in inflammation or malignancy.

Factors predicting outcome of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a followup study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two women with definite RA were followed yearly from an early phase of the disease (symptoms < 5 years) for a mean duration of 6 years. The prognostic value of the first available clinical and laboratory variables and assessments of functional ability was related to several outcome measures (physician's opinion of disease severity, disease activity, radiological abnormalities, functional ability and number of prescribed 2nd-line drugs) by single predictor analysis and by logistic regression. RESULTS: The variables most predictive for one or more of the outcome measures were number of swollen joints, Ritchie score, health assessment questionnaire score, radiographical abnormalities, positive IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), positive IgG-RF, HLA-DR4, and an elevated percentage serum agalactosyl IgG. The accuracy of predicting outcome was calculated from several combinations of these variables, and varied between 70 and 80%. The accuracy based on a combination of the commonly available variables (number of swollen joints, IgM-RF and the erosion score), closely approximated the maximal accuracy that could be achieved. CONCLUSION: The outcome of RA can be predicted by a combination of variables that are commonly available in the clinical setting.