Calcium mass balance in adults during single hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration treatments using lower calcium dialysate concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Debate continues as to the optimum hemodialysis (HD) dialysate calcium concentration. Although current guidelines advocate 1.25-1.5 mmol/L, some investigators have suggested these may cause calcium gains. As such we investigated whether using dialysate calcium of 1.25 mmol/L risked calcium gains, and whether there were differences between hemodiafiltration and high flux HD. METHODS: We continuously collect an aliquot of effluent dialysate during dialysis sessions, and calculated dialysis calcium mass balance by the difference between the amount of calcium delivered as fresh dialysate and that lost in effluent dialysate. RESULTS: We studied 106 stable outpatients, 64% male, mean age 64.4 ± 16.2 years, median dialysis vintage 32 (22-60) months. Most sessions (69%) used a 1.0 mmol/L calcium dialysate, with a median sessional loss of 13.7 (11.5-17.1) mmol, whereas using 1.25 mmol/L the median loss was 7.4 (4.9-10.1) mmol, but with 6.9% had a positive balance (p = 0.031 vs dialysate calcium 1.0 mmol/L). Most patients (85.8%) were treated by hemodiafiltration, but there was no difference in sessional losses (11.7 (8.4-15.8) vs 13.5 (8.1-16.8)) with high flux HD. Dialysis sessional calcium balance was associated with the use of lower dialysate calcium concentration (ß -19.5, 95% confidence limits (95%CL) -27.7 to -11.3, p < 0.001), and sessional duration (ß 0.07 (95% CL) 0.03-012, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Ideally, the choice of dialysate calcium should be individualized, but clinicians should be aware, that even when using a dialysate calcium of 1.25 mmol/L, some patients are at risk of a calcium gain during hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis.

Determinants of hypercalciuria and renal calcifications in chronic hypoparathyroidism: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Hypercalciuria, impaired kidney function and renal calcifications are common in chronic hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT). We aimed to study associations between indices of known importance to the kidney in HypoPT by hypothesizing adverse effects of hypercalciuria on renal outcomes. DESIGN: We used cross-sectional design. PATIENTS: We identified all patients followed for chronic HypoPT at our department and who had been examined by a 24-h urine collection for measurement of renal calcium excretion (24 h U-Ca). MEASUREMENTS: By chart review, we identified additional biochemistry measured in close connection with the collection of urine, as well as demographic, treatments and anthropometrics. RESULTS: The 166 included patients (79.5% females) had a high prevalence of hypercalciuria (65.7%). In multiple adjusted analyses, hypercalciuria was in an independent manner inversely associated with (residual) levels of plasma PTH and positively associated with levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and ionized calcium as well as 24 h U-phosphate, gender, and etiology (surgical vs. non-surgical). Overall, this model explained 54% (p < .001) of the variation in the presence of hypercalciuria. Chronic kidney disease stage three or above was present in 18.3% of the patients, and 42.6% of the 54 patients examined by renal imaging had renal calcifications. However, neither renal function nor renal calcifications were associated with 24 h U-Ca. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercalciuria, impaired renal function and renal calcifications are common in hypoparathyroidism. Hypercalciuria is to a large extent explained by indices of known physiological importance to 24 h U-Ca. However, in the present study, a high renal calcium excretion did not explain renal impairment or kidney calcifications.

Native vs. active vitamin D in children with chronic kidney disease: a cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for the prescription of vitamin D analogues in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still a matter of debate. We aimed to compare native vs. active forms of vitamin D on pre-dialysis children with CKD and evaluate effects on calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and parathyroid hormone (PTH). METHODS: Thirty children with pre-dialysis CKD were enrolled in a prospective cross-over study. Patients were randomly classified into two groups. Group A received native cholecalciferol while group B received alfacalcidol for 3 months. After 1 month (washout period), patients were switched to receive the opposite form for another 3 months. Serum Ca, P, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), PTH, and 25(OH)D3 were measured at study start (BL-1), end of first period (FU-1), before second period (BL-2), and after second period (FU-2). RESULTS: There was significant increase in levels of 25(OH)D3 after administration of either native or active vitamin D in the first period in both groups (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and also in the second period for both groups (p = 0.02 and < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding changes in serum Ca (1st period; p = 0.770 and 2nd period; p = 0.412), serum P (1st period; p = 0.835, 2nd period; p = 0.052), and serum PTH (1st period; p = 0.250, 2nd period; p = 0.539). CONCLUSION: Alfacalcidol and native vitamin D3 were equally effective in decreasing PTH levels and increasing serum 25(OH)D3 in pre-dialysis CKD patients. There was no significant difference between the two forms regarding changes in serum Ca or P. Graphical abstract.

[Roles of active forms of vitamin D in supporting innate immune systems and in reducing excess inflammation in COVID-19].

A reduced supply of micronutrient vitamin D leads to a more severe course of coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Vitamin D deficiency is combined with a decrease in innate antiviral immunity and excess of inflammation. Vitamin D supplementation stimulates the synthesis of antibacterial peptides and is important for weakening the cytokine storm, reducing excessive acute and chronic inflammation, and also for compensating for chronic comorbid pathologies. Active forms of vitamin D (alfacalcidol, etc.) are of particular importance for compensating for vitamin D deficiency in elderly patients, endocrine-immune dysfunction, sarcopenia, chronic renal failure (in which the metabolism of vitamin D in the kidneys is disturbed).

Clinical effect of alfacalcidol in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura: a prospective randomized controlled trial. / é˜¿æ³•éª¨åŒ–é†‡æ²»ç–—å„¿ç«¥è¿‡æ•æ€§ç´«ç™œçš„å‰çž»æ€§éšæœºå¯¹ç §ç ”ç©¶.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of alfacalcidol on serum 25-(OH)D3 level, cellular immune function, and inflammatory factors in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP). METHODS: A total of 200 children with HSP were prospectively enrolled from June 2018 to June 2020. According to the random number table method, they were divided into an observation group and a control group (n=100 each). The control group was treated with vitamin C, rutin tablets, dipyridamole, cimetidine, calcium supplements, and glucocorticoids. In addition to the treatment for the control group, the observation group received alfacalcidol capsules (0.25 µg/d) orally before bed for 4 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of the level of 25-(OH)D3, the percentages of T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+) and NK cells, and the levels of inflammatory factors, interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-21 (IL-21), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), before treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment. The children were followed up for 6 months to determine the recurrence rate and the incidence of renal damage. RESULTS: After treatment, the observation group showed a significantly higher serum 25-(OH)D3 level, significantly higher percentages of CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, and NK cells, and significantly lower levels of IL-6, IL-17, IL-21, and TNF-α compared with the control group (P<0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate and the incidence of renal damage in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Alfacalcidol can increase the serum 25-(OH)D3 level, improve cellular immune function, decrease inflammatory factor levels, and reduce recurrence and renal damage in children with HSP.

Eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in maintaining bone mineral density in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients (e-GLORIA).

INTRODUCTION: Eldecalcitol increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces vertebral fracture in patients with primary osteoporosis. However, the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) patients is unknown. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture with that of alfacalcidol in GIO patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel group study was conducted to identify the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with 0.75 µg eldecalcitol compared with 1.0 µg alfacalcidol in GIO patients. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD increased with eldecalcitol, but decreased with alfacalcidol at 12 and 24 months (between group difference 1.29%, p < 0.01, and 1.10%, p < 0.05, respectively). Total hip and femoral neck BMD were maintained until 24 months by eldecalcitol, but decreased by alfacalcidol (between group difference 0.97%, p < 0.05 and 1.22%, p < 0.05, respectively). Both bone formation and resorption markers were more strongly suppressed by eldecalcitol than by alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol showed better effect on BMD than alfacalcidol in patients with no prevalent fracture and BMD > 70% of the young adult mean, and with ≤ 3 months of previous glucocorticoid treatment. No significant difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture was found, and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Eldecalcitol was more effective than alfacalcidol in maintaining BMD in GIO patients. Because eldecalcitol was effective in patients with no or short-term previous glucocorticoid treatment, as well as those without prevalent fracture or low BMD, eldecalcitol can be a good candidate for primary prevention of GIO. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000011700.

Minodronate combined with alfacalcidol versus alfacalcidol alone for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicenter, randomized, comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical usefulness of minodronate (50 mg/4 weeks) plus alfacalcidol (1 µg/day) (Group M) with that of alfacalcidol alone (1 µg/day) (Group A) for treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary endpoints were the changes from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) and the cumulative incidence of vertebral fracture at 24 months; secondary endpoints included the changes from baseline in total hip (TH) BMD and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: Of 164 patients enrolled, 152 (Group M, n = 75; Group A, n = 77) were included in the analysis of efficacy. At each time point and at 24 months, LS BMD and TH BMD were significantly higher in Group M than in Group A. The 152 patients were divided into two subgroups that were previously treated with glucocorticoids for ≤ 3 months or > 3 months. In both subgroups, the changes from baseline in LS BMD and TH BMD from baseline at 24 months had increased more in Group M than in Group A. There were no differences found in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the groups, because the number of enrolled patients was lesser than that initially expected. In Group M, both bone formation and resorption markers significantly decreased from baseline at 3 months and maintained at 6, 12, and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Minodronate plus alfacalcidol was more effective than alfacalcidol alone in increasing BMD and was effective in increasing BMD for both prevention and treatment. Therefore, minodronate can be a good candidate drug for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Elevated Bone Remodeling Markers of CTX and P1NP in Addition to Sclerostin in Patients with X-linked Hypophosphatemia: A Cross-Sectional Controlled Study.

Aspects of bone remodeling have only been scarcely studied in X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH). In this cross-sectional controlled study, we assessed biochemical indices of bone remodeling and sclerostin in 27 adult patients (median age 47 [range 24-79] years, 19 women, 8 men) with XLH matched with 81 healthy control subjects (1:3) with respect to age-, sex-, and menopausal status. Markers of bone resorption (carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen, CTX) and formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, P1NP) were higher in XLH patients compared to controls (median [IQR] 810 [500-1340] vs 485 [265-715] ng/l and 90 [57-136] vs 49 [39-65] ug/l, respectively, both p < 0.001) as well as sclerostin (0.81 [0.60-1.18] vs 0.54 [0.45-0.69] ng/ml, p < 0.001). Similar differences were found when comparing currently treated (with phosphate and alfacalcidol) (n = 11) and untreated (n = 16) XLH patients with their respective controls. We found no significant associations with treatment status and indices of bone remodeling or sclerostin although sclerostin tended to be increased in untreated versus treated (p = 0.06). In contrast to previous histomorphometric studies suggesting a low remodeling activity in XLH, these biochemical indices suggest high osteoblast and osteoclast activity. Further studies are needed to ascertain if the higher sclerostin level in XLH is related to osteocyte dysfunction or represents a secondary phenomenon.

The possible antidiabetic effects of vitamin D receptors agonist in rat model of type 2 diabetes.

Vitamin D3 deficiency was found to be tightly linked to many health problems including metabolic syndrome, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In our study, we tested the possible antidiabetic effects of one of vitamin D3 analogs, alfacalcidol, solely or in a combination with metformin on type 2 diabetic rats. Type 2 diabetic model rats were induced by feeding high-fat diet for 4 weeks followed by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. In addition to the control group, the diabetic rats were divided into four groups: untreated, metformin-treated, alfacalcidol-treated, and combination-treated group (metformin + alfacalcidol) for 4 weeks. The level of fasting blood glucose, fasting serum insulin, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, serum lipid profile, liver enzymes, calcium, phosphorus, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 were also determined. Besides, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) and vitamin D receptors (VDR) gene expression at mRNA and protein levels were evaluated. The level of significance was fixed at P ≤ 0.05 for all statistical tests. Alfacalcidol, solely or combined with metformin, significantly ameliorated glucose homeostasis and lipid profile parameters (P < 0.001) with a neutral effect on calcium and phosphorus levels. Significant downregulation of mRNA expression of SREBP-1c in the liver, white as well as brown adipose tissues (P < 0.001) and different patterns of mRNA expression of VDR gene in pancreas and white adipose tissue were observed in rats treated with alfacalcidol solely or in combination with metformin. Vitamin D3 analogs can modulate glucose parameters and lipid metabolism in a diabetic rat model and it provides additional protective effects when combined with metformin.

Lessons learned from the management of Hungry Bone Syndrome following the removal of an Atypical Parathyroid Adenoma.

Hungry Bone Syndrome (HBS) refers to rapid, profound, and prolonged hypocalcemia associated with hypophosphatemia and hypomagnesemia occurring in patients with increased bone turnover after successful management of the underlying disorder. We describe a male patient with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), in whom HBS was diagnosed 6 months after parathyroidectomy. Histopathologic examination revealed an atypical parathyroid adenoma (APA), while immunohistochemistry showed cell proliferation index Ki-67 10% and overexpression of cyclin D1 (>90%). Preoperative treatment with vitamin D3 had normalized 25OHD and alkaline phosphatase levels, reflected in an improvement in bone turnover prior to surgery. Postoperative treatment for HBS with alfacalcidol, calcium, vitamin D3 and magnesium was administered for a long period. This treatment prevented severe postoperative hypocalcemia and he was discharged two days later. Preoperative cinacalcet treatment did not reduce hypercalcemia implying that the tumor had lack of calciumsensing receptors (CaSR). In conclusion, preoperative restoration of low 25OHD levels is essential for prevention of HBS. Postoperative treatment with active metabolites of vitamin D must be initiated as early as possible, in order to prevent or minimize the development of HBS, and to reduce the duration of hospitalization.

Case report: Electron microscopic evaluation of bone from a patient treated with cinacalcet hydrochloride, maxacalcitol, and alfacalcidol for hyperparathyroid bone disease with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Evaluation of bone is of great importance in chronic kidney disease patients, as these patients are at an increased risk for fractures. We treated a hemodialysis patient suffering from hyperparathyroid bone disease with cinacalcet hydrochloride and concurrent administration of maxacalcitol and alfacalcidol for a year. Hyperparathyroid bone disease is characterized by cortical thinning, increased cortical porosity, reduced trabecular bone volume, and increased hypomineralized matrix volume, and there is little information to date about the effects of treatment with cinacalcet hydrochloride on the bone fragility in patients with hyperparathyroid bone disease. In the present study, histological and backscattered electron microscopic evaluation of this combination treatment revealed an excellent improvement of both bone volume and bone morphology. This treatment improved cortical thinning, cortical porosity, and trabecular thinning. Furthermore, the treatment also reduced hypomineralized matrix volume, indicative of improved mineralization by osteocytes. We speculate that the intermittent maxacalcitol administration may have effectively stimulated the vitamin D receptors expressed on osteocytes and osteoblasts, resulting in increased mineralization. Our approach for evaluating the bone in patients with chronic kidney disease by backscattered electron microscopy is novel.

Stimulation of intestinal calcium absorption by orally administrated vitamin D3 compounds: a prospective open-label randomized trial in osteoporosis.

Intestinal fractional calcium absorption (FCA) was assessed before and after vitamin D3 treatment. Serum 1,25(OH)2D concentration was significantly increased by plain vitamin D3 and reduced by eldecalcitol. The 1α hydroxyl calcidiol and eldecalcitol treatments increased FCA, which may be induced through direct stimulation of vitamin D receptors in the intestine. INTRODUCTION: To assess the effects of vitamin D3 compounds on intestinal FCA and calcium-regulating hormones in post-menopausal osteoporosis, a randomized open-label prospective study was conducted. METHODS: Forty eligible patients were allocated randomly into four groups: eldecalcitol (ELD; 0.75 µg/day), 1α hydroxyl calcidiol (ALF; 1 µg/day), plain vitamin D3 (800 IU/day), and control. Before and after the 4-week treatment, intestinal FCA was estimated by using a double isotope method, and serum concentrations of calcium-regulating hormones and a bone turnover marker were measured. RESULTS: The baseline FCA value of the participants was 21.5 ± 7.9% (mean ± SD) and was significantly correlated with serum 1,25(OH)2D (calcitriol) concentration. After the treatment, the FCA significantly increased by 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6 to 77.4%) in the ELD group and by 45.9% (27.9 to 63.8%) in the ALF group, whereas no significant change in the plain vitamin D3 group was found. Unlike the baseline FCA, post-treatment FCA exhibited no significant correlation with serum calcitriol concentration. Parathyroid hormone levels were suppressed by ALF and plain vitamin D3 but were sustained in the ELD and control groups. Serum calcitriol tended to be suppressed by ELD, whereas plain vitamin D3 treatment increased both serum 25(OH)D and calcitriol concentrations. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that oral administration of vitamin D3 analogues (ALF and ELD) stimulates FCA but plain vitamin D3 does not. Those effects of vitamin D3 compounds on FCA were independent of serum calcitriol concentration, suggesting that ALF and ELD may directly stimulate intestinal vitamin D receptors.

Effect of combined vitamin D receptor activator and lanthanum carbonate on serum fibroblast growth factor 23 level in predialysis patients (CVD-LAF study): design and method.

BACKGROUND: Whether vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) use is beneficial in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear, because it is possible that VDRA increases serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial in predialysis patients to determine the effect of VDRA alone or in combination with lanthanum carbonate (LC) on serum FGF23 levels. METHODS: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Enrollment will commence February 1, 2018, using the following inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 20 years, (2) CKD with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 10-45 mL/min/1.73 m2, (3) serum adjusted calcium level < 9.5 mg/dL, (4) serum phosphate level 4.0-6.0 mg/dL, and (5) serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) level ≥ 60 pg/mL. Study patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive alfacalcidol alone or in combination with LC. The initial dose of alfacalcidol will be 0.25-0.5 µg once a day according to serum adjusted calcium level. The initial dose of LC will be 250 mg once a day. We will measure serum intact and C-terminal FGF23 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome will be serum FGF23 level at 24 weeks compared with baseline. DISCUSSION: This study aims to determine whether low-dose oral VDRA increases serum FGF23 level and whether the combination of VDRA and LC inhibits this increase. The results will be useful in the management of CKD-mineral and bone disorder in predialysis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030503. Registered 20 January 2018.

Comparison of the effects of denosumab between a native vitamin D combination and an active vitamin D combination in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The aim of this 12-month, retrospective study was to compare the effects of denosumab (DMAb; 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) plus native vitamin D (VD) (cholecalciferol) combination therapy with DMAb plus active VD analog (alfacalcidol) combination therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients [N = 127; mean age 75.6 years (range 58-93 years); 28 treatment-naïve patients, 59 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, 40 patients treated with teriparatide daily] were allocated to either (1) the DMAb plus native VD group (n = 60; cholecalciferol, 10 µg, plus calcium, 610 mg/day; 13 treatment-naïve patients, 28 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 19 patients treated with teriparatide daily) or (2) the DMAb plus active VD group [n = 67; alfacalcidol, 0.8 ± 0.0 µg, plus calcium, 99.2 ± 8.5 mg/day; 15 treatment-naïve patients, 31 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 21 patients treated with teriparatide daily) on the basis of each physician's decision. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), serum bone turnover marker levels, and fracture incidence were monitored every 6 months. There were no significant differences in baseline age, BMD, bone turnover marker levels, and prior treatments between the two groups. After 12 months, compared with the DMAb plus native VD group, the DMAb plus active VD group showed similar increases in the BMD of the lumbar spine (6.4% vs 6.5%) and total hip (3.3% vs 3.4%), but significantly greater increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.0% vs 4.9%, P < 0.001) and the distal part of the forearm (third of radius) (-0.8% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01). These tendencies were similar regardless of the differences in the prior treatments. The rates of decrease of bone turnover marker levels were similar for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (-49.0% vs -49.0%), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (-45.9% vs -49.3%), and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (-56.0  vs -66.5%), whereas serum intact parathyroid hormone levels were significantly lower in the DMAb plus active VD group (47.6 pg/mL vs 30.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001). The rate of hypocalcemia was 1.7% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 1.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, and the rate of clinical fracture incidence was 8.3% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 4.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, with no significant difference between the groups. DMAb with active VD combination therapy may be a more effective treatment option than DMAb with native VD combination therapy in terms of increasing BMD of the femoral neck and distal part of the forearm and also maintaining serum intact parathyroid hormone at lower levels.

Alfacalcidol Increases the Therapeutic Efficacy of Ibandronate on Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Women with Primary Osteoporosis.

Bisphosphonates (BPs) increase bone mineral density (BMD) through the inhibition of osteoclast activity. Among BPs, ibandronate (IBN) is a strong inhibitor of bone resorption. However, the effects of a vitamin D analogue, alfacalcidol (ALF), on IBN treatment for osteoporosis is unknown. Fifty-three treatment-naïve post-menopausal women with primary osteoporosis were recruited and divided into IBN-treatment group (IBN group) and IBN with ALF group (IBN/ALF group). IBN (1.0 mg) was intravenously injected once a month, with or without oral ALF (1.0 µg/day). Ultimately, 19 subjects in IBN group and 26 in IBN/ALF group were analyzed. Bone turnover markers were examined at 4, 6, 12, and 18 months, and BMD was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months. Compared with pre-treatment, bone turnover markers significantly decreased in both groups after 4 months. The levels of serum N-terminal propeptide of type-1 procollagen and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen were significantly lower in IBN/ALF group than those in IBN group at 12 months. Lumbar 1-4 (L)-BMD significantly increased from 6 months in IBN/ALF group and at 18 months in IBN group. L-BMD was significantly higher in IBN/ALF group (6.6% increase) than in IBN group (3.4%) at 18 months. Total hip (H)-BMD significantly increased from 6 months in IBN/ALF group and tended to improve in IBN group. H-BMD was significantly higher in IBN/ALF group (4.8%) than in IBN group (3.2%) at 18 months. In conclusion, treatment with ALF in combination with IBN improves BMD in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.

Efficacy of Alendronate for the Prevention of Bone Loss in Calcar Region Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD) loss around femoral implants, particularly in the proximal femur, is a common outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Previous studies reported the prevention of postsurgical decrease in BMD with the use of osteoporosis drug therapy. This randomized study evaluated the efficacy of alendronate and alfacalcidol for preserving BMD over a long-term follow-up. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with hip osteoarthritis who had undergone primary cementless total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned to an alendronate (n = 20), alfacalcidol (n = 18), or control (n = 22) group. Periprosthetic BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 1 week, 1 year, and the current follow-up (minimum 9 years after surgery). Changes in BMD are reported as mean percentages relative to the values at 1 week (baseline reference). RESULTS: All groups showed a significant decrease in the BMD of the calcar at the current follow-up compared to the values at both 1 week and 1 year postoperatively (P < .001). The BMD values were significantly higher in the alendronate group than in the alfacalcidol and control groups (P < .05). The BMD values at the current follow-up were 76% ± 30% (alendronate group), 64% ± 22% (alfacalcidol group), and 59% ± 22% (control group) of the baseline values. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the efficacy of early administration of alendronate for the prevention of bone loss in the calcar region.

Effects of 1α-Calcidol (Alfacalcidol) on Microvascular Endothelial Function, Arterial Stiffness, and Blood Pressure in Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of six months alfacalcidol on microvascular endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and BP in DN patients. METHODS: Twenty-eight DN patients on alfacalcidol, 0.25 µg daily for six months were compared to 32 controls on conventional treatment. Measurements of microvascular endothelial function, arterial stiffness [AIx and PWV], hsCRP, and BP were performed; differences between baseline and six months treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: No difference was seen in microvascular endothelial function for both groups after six months. Improvement in CSBP (p = 0.027) with trends of improvement in AIx (p = 0.063), PWV (p = 0.075), and systolic BP (p = 0.088) were seen in the alfacalcidol group with no changes observed in controls. Subgroup analysis of alfacalcidol group showed that vitamin D-deficient patients had better response to treatment. hsCRP level remained unchanged in alfacalcidol group; significant increase was however seen in controls. CONCLUSION: Alfacalcidol did not have an effect on microvascular endothelial function in DN patients. Alfacalcidol significantly improved CSBP with trends of improvement in arterial stiffness and peripheral BP. Alfacalcidol appears to be more beneficial in vitamin D-deficient patients.

Effect of Alfacalcidol on multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.

CONTEXT: Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, there is no medication that has been approved specifically to treat MS-related fatigue. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D analogue, Alfacalcidol, on MS-related fatigue. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial in patients with clinically definite MS by McDonald criteria conducted in a single university-affiliated medical center in Israel. Randomly selected patients from the Sheba MS Registry computerized database (N=600) were assessed using the self-report Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Patients with clinically meaningful fatigue (N=259) were further assessed for trial eligibility, and MS patients with significant fatigue (N=158; 61%, 118 females, mean age 41.1 ± 9.2 years and mean disease duration of 6.2 ± 5.5 years) were included in the study and randomized to receive treatment or placebo. INTERVENTION: Alfacalcidol (1 mcg/d, N=80) or placebo (N=78) was administered for six consecutive months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint of the study was the change between Alfacalcidol and placebo-treated patients in the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) score; the cut-off point for improvement was defined as 30% decrease. All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle and were performed for all participants based on the group they were randomly allocated regardless of whether or not they dropped out. RESULTS: Alfacalcidol decreased the mean relative FIS score as compared with placebo (-41.6% vs. -27.4%, p=0.007, respectively). This advantage was further emphasized when the modified FIS (MFIS) relative change was calculated. Quality of Life (QoL) improved in Alfacalcidol-treated patients as compared with placebo in the RAYS psychological (p=0.033) and social (p=0.043) sub-scales. The Alfacalcidol-treated group had reduced number of relapses (p=0.006) and higher proportion of relapse-free patients (p=0.007). Reduction of relapses by Alfacalcidol became significant at 4 months of treatment, was sustained at 6 months and decayed 2 months after drug discontinuation. Alfacalcidol treatment was safe and no serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Alfacalcidol is a safe and effective treatment strategy to decrease fatigue and improve QoL in patients with MS.

Randomized study comparing vitamin D3 and 1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in combination with pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An intention-to-treat prospective randomized study was carried out to compare the potentiation of antiviral efficacies between cholecalciferol, non-activated vitamin D3 supplement, and alfacalcidol, activated 1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 [1α (OH)-vitamin D3]. METHODS: Chronic hepatitis patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection showing serum HCV-RNA levels greater than 5 Log IU/mL received oral administration of cholecalciferol (2000 IU/day) or alfacalcidol (0.5 µg/day) for 4 weeks, and then they were given pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-α2a plus ribavirin therapy in combination with either vitamin D3 for 48 or 72 weeks according to the response-guided manner. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were evaluated. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)-D3] levels were increased only in patients in the cholecalciferol group during the lead-in vitamin D administration, and the levels at 4 weeks were higher in these patients than in those in the alfacalcidol group (P < 0.001), while serum 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1α,25(OH)2 -D3] levels were not different between both groups. Rapid virological response was obtained in six (33%) patients in the cholecalciferol group; the ratio was higher than that in the alfacalcidol group (one patient; 6%, P < 0.05). Serum HCV-RNA level decline at 4 weeks of combined Peg-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin therapy compared with the baseline levels were greater in the cholecalciferol group (4.6 Log IU/mL) than in the alfacalcidol group (3.5 Log IU/mL) (P < 0.05), when four patients showing null response to the therapy was excluded. However, both complete early virological response and sustained viral response rates were not different between both groups. CONCLUSION: Cholecalciferol produced superior potentiation of the antiviral activity than alfacalcidol only during the initial periods of combined Peg-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin therapy through upregulation of serum 25(OH)-D3 levels.

The effects of alfacalcidol combined with calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis and its influence on levels of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of Alfacalcidol combined with Calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis and its influence on the degree of pain, bone metabolism indexes, bone mineral density and inflammatory factor levels. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 110 patients with osteoporosis treated in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the study subjects. According to different treatment methods, these patients were divided into an observation group and a control group with 55 cases in each group. Patients from the control group were treated with the alfacalcidol capsules alone, while those from the observation group were treated with the alfacalcidol capsules combined with intramuscular calcitonin injection. Patients in both groups were treated for 6 months continuously. The treatment effect, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI), bone mineral density (BMD), serum markers levels such as calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), type I procollagen amino terminal propeptide (PINP) and ß-collagen special sequence (ß-Crosslaps), the levels of inflammatory factor including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), quality Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) scores and incidences of adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The effective rate of patients in the observation group was 90.91%, which was significantly higher than 74.54% in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the term of VAS score, ODI score, serum markers levels, bone mineral density, inflammatory levels, QLQ-C30 before treatment between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the post-treatment VAS score, ODI score, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, TRACP-5b, PINP and ß-Crosslaps in the observation group were obviously lower, while the post-treatment QLQ-C30, bone mineral density, Ca, P, ALP, IGF-1 levels were significantly higher (all P<0.05). No statistical differences were found in the incidences of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of Alfacalcidol combined with Calcitonin is effective in the treatment of osteoporosis patients, which can effectively improve the levels of bone metabolism indexes and bone mineral density, alleviate the symptoms, enhance the life quality and reduce the levels of inflammation. Therefore, it is worth promoting.