Nonclinical factors associated with the treatment of older women with newly diagnosed low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common form of noninvasive breast cancer and is associated with an excellent prognosis. As a result, there is concern about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of DCIS because most patients with DCIS are treated as though they have invasive breast cancer and undergo either breast-conserving surgery (BCS)-most commonly followed by radiation therapy (RT)-or mastectomy. Little research to date has focused on nonclinical factors influencing treatments for DCIS. METHODS: Population-based data were analyzed from five state cancer registries (California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas) on women aged 65 years and older newly diagnosed with DCIS during the years 2003 to 2014 using a retrospective cohort design and multinominal logistic modeling. The registry records with Medicare enrollment data and fee-for-service claims to obtain treatments (BCS alone, BCS with RT, or mastectomy) were merged. Surgeon practice structure was identified through physician surveys and internet searches. RESULTS: Patients of surgeons employed by cancer centers or health systems were less likely to receive BCS with RT or mastectomy than patients of surgeons in single specialty or multispecialty practices. There also was substantial geographic variation in treatments, with patients in New York, New Jersey, and California being less likely to receive BCS with RT or mastectomy than patients in Texas or Florida. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest nonclinical factors including the culture of the practice and/or financial incentives are significantly associated with the types of treatment received for DCIS. Increasing awareness and targeted efforts to educate physicians about DCIS management among older women with low-grade DCIS could reduce patient harm and yield substantial cost savings.

Δ 9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol alleviates hyperalgesia in a humanized mouse model of sickle cell disease.

People with sickle cell disease (SCD) often experience chronic pain as well as unpredictable episodes of acute pain, which significantly affect their quality of life and life expectancy. Current treatment strategies for SCD-associated pain primarily rely on opioid analgesics, which have limited efficacy and cause serious adverse effects. Cannabis has emerged as a potential alternative, yet its efficacy remains uncertain. In this study, we investigated the antinociceptive effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabis' intoxicating constituent, in male HbSS mice, which express >99% human sickle hemoglobin, and male HbAA mice, which express normal human hemoglobin A, as a control. Acute THC administration (0.1-3 mg-kg-1, intraperitoneal, i.p.) dose-dependently reduced mechanical and cold hypersensitivity in HbSS, but not HbAA mice. In the tail-flick assay, THC (1 and 3 mg-kg-1, i.p.) produced substantial antinociceptive effects in HbSS mice. By contrast, THC (1 mg-kg-1, i.p.) did not alter anxiety-like behavior (elevated plus maze) or long-term memory (24-h novel object recognition). Subchronic THC treatment (1 and 3 mg-kg-1, i.p.) provided sustained relief of mechanical hypersensitivity but led to tolerance in cold hypersensitivity in HbSS mice. Together, the findings identify THC as a possible therapeutic option for the management of chronic pain in SCD. Further research is warranted to elucidate its mechanism of action and possible interaction with other cannabis constituents. Significance Statement The study explores THC's efficacy in alleviating pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) using a humanized mouse model. Findings indicate that acute THC administration reduces mechanical and cold hypersensitivity in SCD mice without impacting emotional and cognitive dysfunction. Subchronic THC treatment offers sustained relief of mechanical hypersensitivity but leads to cold hypersensitivity tolerance. These results offer insights into THC's potential as an alternative pain management option in SCD, highlighting both its benefits and limitations.

Development of Cilofexor, an intestinally-biased Farnesoid X Receptor agonist, for the treatment of fatty liver disease.

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor that controls bile acid, lipid, and cholesterol metabolism. FXR-targeted drugs have shown promise in late-stage clinical trials for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Herein, we used clinical results from our first non-steroidal FXR agonist, Px-102 (4-[2-[2-chloro-4-[[5-cyclopropyl-3-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-4-isoxazolyl]methoxy]phenyl]cyclopropyl] benzoic acid), to develop cilofexor, a potent, non-steroidal FXR agonist with a more manageable safety profile. Px-102 demonstrated the anticipated pharmacodynamic (PD) effects in healthy volunteers but caused a 2-fold increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and changes in cholesterol levels. These data guided development of a high fat diet mouse model to screen FXR agonists based on ALT and cholesterol changes. Cilofexor was identified to elicit only minor changes in these parameters. The differing effects of cilofexor and Px-102 on ALT/cholesterol in the model could not be explained by potency or specificity, and we hypothesized that the relative contribution of intestinal and liver FXR activation may be responsible. Gene expression analysis from rodent studies revealed that cilofexor, but not Px-102, had a bias for FXR transcriptional activity in the intestine compared to the liver. Fluorescent imaging in hepatoma cells demonstrated similar subcellular localization for cilofexor and Px-102, but cilofexor was more rapidly washed out, consistent with a lower membrane residence time contributing to reduced hepatic transcriptional effects. Cilofexor demonstrated antisteatotic and antifibrotic efficacy in rodent models and antisteatotic efficacy in a monkey model, with the anticipated PD and a manageable safety profile in human phase I studies. Significance Statement FXR (farnesoid X receptor) agonists have shown promise in treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and other liver diseases in the clinic, but balancing efficacy with undesired side effects has been difficult. Here, we examined the preclinical and clinical effects of the first-generation FXR agonist, Px-102 (4-[2-[2-chloro-4-[[5-cyclopropyl-3-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-4-isoxazolyl]methoxy]phenyl]cyclopropyl] benzoic acid), to enable the selection of an analog, cilofexor, with unique properties that reduced side effects yet maintained efficacy. Cilofexor is one of few remaining FXR agonists in clinical development.

Low molecular weight acids and OATP1B mediated hepatic clearance: In vitro and in vivo evaluation using novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (Dustats).

Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B) plays a key role in the hepatic clearance of a majority of high molecular weight (MW) acids and zwitterions. Here, we evaluated the role of OATP1B-mediated uptake in the clearance of novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors ("Dustats"), which are typically low MW (300-400 daltons) aliphatic carboxylic acids. Five acid dustats, namely daprodustat, desidustat, enarodustat, roxadustat and vadadustat, showed specific transport by OATP1B1/1B3 in transporter-transfected HEK293 cells. Neutral compound, molidustat, was not a substrate to OATP1B1/1B3. None of the dustats showed transport by other hepatic uptake transporters, including NTCP, OAT2 and OAT7. In the primary human hepatocytes, uptake of all acids was significantly reduced by rifampin (OATP1B inhibitor); with an estimated fraction transported by OATP1B (ft ,OATP1B) of up to >80% (daprodustat). Molidustat uptake was minimally inhibited by rifampin; and low permeability acids (desidustat and enarodustat) also showed biliary efflux in sandwich culture human hepatocytes. In vivo, intravenous pharmacokinetics of all 5 acids was significantly altered by a single-dose rifampin (30 mg/kg) in Cynomolgus monkey. Hepatic clearance (non-renal) was about 4-fold (vadadustat) to >11-fod (daprodustat and roxadustat) higher in control group compared to rifampin-treated subjects. In vivo ft ,OATP1B was estimated to be ~70-90%. In the case of molidustat, rifampin had a minimal effect on overall clearance. Rifampin also considerably reduced volume of distribution of daprodustat and roxadustat. Overall, OATP1B significantly contribute to the hepatic clearance and pharmacokinetics of several dustats, which are low MW carboxylic acids. OATP1B activity should therefore by evaluated in this property space. Significance Statement Our in vitro and in vivo results suggest that OATP1B-mediated hepatic uptake play a significant role in the pharmacokinetics of low MW acidic dustats, which are being developed or approved for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease. Significant active uptake mechanisms are not apparent for the neutral compound, molidustat. Characterization of uptake mechanisms is therefore important in predicting human pharmacokinetics and evaluating drug-drug interactions for low MW acids.

Do longer duration nonclinical toxicology studies provide predictive clinical safety value? The IQ consortium longer duration nonclinical to clinical translational database.

The IQ Consortium's DruSafe Leadership Group previously reported results of a nonclinical to clinical translational database for First-In-Human (FIH)-enabling animal toxicology studies. We have completed an additional translational database populated with longer duration (>1 month) animal toxicology studies and longer duration (Phase 2 and beyond) clinical trials. The blinded database was composed of 127 molecules. Animal and clinical data were categorized by organ system and animal model (e.g. rodent, dog). The 2 × 2 contingency table (true positive, false positive, true negative, false negative) was used for statistical analysis and both the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. As also reported in the FIH database, the NPV was the strongest predictive performance measure at 96 %. The PPV was lower than the FIH database with the rodent at 29 %, dog at 21 % and NHP at 20 %. No new additional target organs were observed in 62 % of the entries. A new target organ was identified in 38 % of the entries, with the majority in a rodent (26 %) and fewer in the dog (8 %) or NHP (12 %). However, new target organ data resulted in only a PPV of 13 %, suggesting that current ICH requirements for longer duration animal general toxicology studies should be re-evaluated and better aligned with the 3Rs. A newer paradigm could include an appropriately justified single animal model for longer duration studies, in addition to utilizing New Approach Methods (NAMs) that would provide translational safety data, but additional research is needed.

Evaluation of rat and rabbit embryofetal development studies with pharmaceuticals: the added value of a second species.

Embryofetal development (EFD) studies are performed to characterize risk of drugs in pregnant women and on embryofetal development. In line with the ICH S5(R3) guideline, these studies are generally conducted in one rodent and one non-rodent species, commonly rats and rabbits. However, the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species to risk assessment is debatable. In this study, rat and rabbit EFD studies were evaluated to analyze the added value of a second species. Information on rat and rabbit EFD studies conducted for human pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing authorization to the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2022 was collected from the database of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, along with EFD studies conducted for known human teratogens. In total, 369 compounds were included in the database. For 55.6% of the compounds similar effects were observed in rat and rabbit EFD studies. Discordance was observed for 44.6% of compounds. Discordance could often be explained based on occurrence of maternal toxicity or the compound's mechanism of action. For other compounds, discordance was considered of limited clinical relevance due to high exposure margins or less concerning EFD toxicity. For 6.2%, discordance could not be explained and was considered clinically relevant. Furthermore, for specific therapeutic classes, concordance between rat and rabbit could vary. In conclusion, in many cases the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species is limited. These data could help identify scenarios in which (additional) EFD studies could be waived or create a weight-of-evidence model to determine the need for (additional) EFD studies.

EMA commentary on the guideline on quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects of medicinal products containing genetically modified cells.

Great advances have been made in the knowledge of development and regulatory approval of medicinal product containing genetically modified cells. Although a guideline has been available in the EU since 2012, the current updated version provides a useful guide to developers and professionals involved in the regulatory process of these medicines. This article presents the main issues communicated in that guidance, the regulators' insights and a commentary from the academic developers' point of view.

Considerations for the Identification and Conveyance of Clinical Pathology Findings in Preclinical Toxicity Studies: Results From the 9th ESTP International Expert Workshop.

The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (ESTP) organized a panel of 24 international experts from many fields of toxicologic clinical pathology (e.g., industry, academia, and regulatory) that came together in 2021 to align the use of terminology to convey the importance of clinical pathology findings in preclinical toxicity studies. An additional goal consisted of how to identify important findings in standard and nonstandard clinical pathology associated endpoints. This manuscript summarizes the information and opinions discussed and shared at the ninth ESTP International Expert Workshop, April 5 to 6, 2022. In addition to terminology usage, the workshop considered topics related to the identification and conveyance of the importance of test item-related findings. These topics included sources of variability, comparators, statistics, reporting, correlations to other study data, nonstandard biomarkers, indirect/secondary findings, and an overall weight-of-evidence approach.

A Minimal Approach to Demonstrate Concordance of Digital and Conventional Microscopy in Toxicologic Pathology.

Digitalization of pathology workflows has undergone a rapid evolution and has been widely established in the diagnostic field but remains a challenge in the nonclinical safety context due to lack of regulatory guidance and validation experience for good laboratory practice (GLP) use. One means to demonstrate that digital slides are fit for purpose, that is, provide sufficient quality for pathologists to reach a diagnosis, is conduction of comparison studies, which have been published both, for veterinary and human diagnostic pathology, but not for toxicologic pathology. Here, we present an approach that uses study material from nonclinical safety studies and that allows for the statistical comparison of concordance rates for glass and digital slide evaluation while minimizing time and effort for the involved personnel. Using a benchmark study design, we demonstrate that evaluation of digital slides fits the purpose of nonclinical safety evaluation. These results add to reports of successful workflow validations and support the full adaptation of digital pathology in the regulatory field.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: mRNA Vaccine Safety-Separating Fact From Fiction.

SARS-CoV-2 spread rapidly across the globe, contributing to the death of millions of individuals from 2019 to 2023, and has continued to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality after the pandemic. At the start of the pandemic, no vaccines or anti-viral treatments were available to reduce the burden of disease associated with this virus, as it was a novel SARS coronavirus. Because of the tremendous need, the development of vaccines to protect against COVID-19 was critically important. The flexibility and ease of manufacture of nucleic acid-based vaccines, specifically mRNA-based products, allowed the accelerated development of COVID-19 vaccines. Although mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics had been in clinical trials for over a decade, there were no licensed mRNA vaccines on the market at the start of the pandemic. The rapid development of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines reduced serious complications and death from the virus but also engendered significant public concerns, which continue now, years after emergency-use authorization and subsequent licensure of these vaccines. This article summarizes and addresses some of the safety concerns that continue to be expressed about these vaccines and their underlying technology.

Characterization of an Uncommon Finding in the Basal Nuclei in Beagle Dogs: A Novel Potential Background Lesion in the Canine Brain.

Degenerative lesions specific to the basal nuclei have not been described as a background finding in Beagle dogs. This report comprises a documentation of seven cases. In the context of a nonclinical safety studies, the authors suggest documenting the lesion descriptively as degeneration neuropil, basal nuclei, bilateral as it is characterized by (1) vacuolation, neuropil; (2) gliosis (astro- and/or microgliosis); and (3) demyelination. This novel lesion is considered a potential new background change for several reasons: (1) It occurred in animals from test item-treated and also vehicle-treated groups; (2) no dose dependency was observed; (3) in one of six affected test item-treated dogs, the given compound was shown not to penetrate the blood-brain barrier; and (4) statistical comparison between the proportions of affected dogs in the treatment and control groups did not yield a statistically significant difference. The etiology remains unknown and is subject to further investigations.

Uncovering the correlation between neurotransmitter-specific functional connectivity and multidimensional anxiety in a non-clinical cohort.

Research on anxiety faces challenges due to the wide range of symptoms, making it difficult to determine if different aspects of anxiety are linked to distinct neurobiological processes. Both alterations in functional brain connectivity (FC) and monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems are implicated as potential neural bases of anxiety. We aimed to investigate whole-brain FC involving monoaminergic nuclei and its association with anxiety dimensions in 178 non-clinical participants. Nine anxiety-related scales were used, encompassing trait and state anxiety scores, along with measures of cost-probability, hypervigilance, reward-punishment sensitivity, uncertainty, and trait worry. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired, focusing on seven brainstem regions representing serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic nuclei, with their FC patterns voxel-wise correlated with the scales. All models underwent family-wise-error correction for multiple comparisons. We observed intriguing relationships: trait and state anxiety scores exhibited opposing correlations in FC between the dorsal raphe nucleus and the paracingulate gyrus. Additionally, we identified shared neural correlates, such as a negative correlation between the locus coeruleus and the frontal pole. This connection was significantly associated with scores on measures of probability, hypervigilance, reward sensitivity, and trait worry. These findings underscore the intricate interplay between anxiety dimensions and subcortico-cortical FC patterns, shedding light on the underlying neural mechanisms governing anxiety.

Psychometric properties of the Arabic translation of the Dark Future Scale questionnaire in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking young adults.

BACKGROUND: Through the years, studying negative behaviors of the worldwide population seized the spotlight from many researchers who focused on building scales in order the measure the level of worries, fear and even depression of such stressed individuals. By definition, "Future anxiety" (FA) is fueled by negative thoughts leading to intense fear of unknown future events. The Dark Future scale (DFS) measures the level of anxiety experienced towards the future. Our aim was to examine the psychometric properties of a novel Arabic translation of the DFS. METHODS: A sample of 684 Arabic-speaking young adults (65.6% women) filled the DFS, TEMPS-M (temperaments) and DASS-8 (psychological distress). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) supported a unidimensional model of the DFS score, with all 5 items retained. This scale had good reliability. Moreover, concurrent validity demonstrated significant associations between DFS scores and psychological distress, depressive, cyclothymic, irritable and anxious temperament. Scores achieved scalar invariance across gender, with women having greater exposure to anxiety about the future. CONCLUSION: Overall, these findings led to the conclusion that the Arabic DFS is a psychometrically valid tool for the assessment of FA. The DFS is a brief, reliable and easy to apply scale that would help researchers in psychology and psychiatry in assessing anxiety about future.

A review of the scientific literature on experimental toxicity studies of COVID-19 vaccines, with special attention to publications in toxicology journals.

Since the reports of the first cases of COVID-19, in less than 5 years, a huge number of documents regarding that disease and the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for the infection, have been published. The tremendous number of scientific documents covers many topics on different issues directly related to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. The number of articles-including reviews-reporting adverse/side effects of the approved COVID-19 vaccines is considerable. A wide range of adverse/side effects have been reported in humans after COVID-19 vaccination: thrombotic events/thrombocytopenia, myocarditis/pericarditis, cutaneous reactions, immune-mediated effects, psychiatric adverse events, systemic lupus erythematosus, reproductive toxicity, and other miscellaneous adverse effects. In contrast, information on nonclinical studies conducted to assess the potential toxicity/adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines in laboratory animals, is comparatively very scarce. The present review was aimed at revising the scientific literature regarding the studies in laboratory animals on the toxic/adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the investigations reported in those specific toxicology journals with the highest impact factors have been examined one by one. The results of the present review indicate that most nonclinical/experimental studies on the adverse/toxic effects of the COVID-19 vaccines and/or potential candidates showed-in general terms-a good safety profile. Only in some animal studies were certain adverse effects found. However, a rather surprising result has been the limited number of available (in the databases PubMed and Scopus) nonclinical studies performed by the companies that have been the largest manufacturers of mRNA vaccines in the world. It is assumed that these studies have been conducted. However, they have not been published in scientific journals, which does not allow the judgment of the international scientific community, including toxicologists.

Points to consider regarding the use and implementation of virtual controls in nonclinical general toxicology studies.

The replacement of a proportion of concurrent controls by virtual controls in nonclinical safety studies has gained traction over the last few years. This is supported by foundational work, encouraged by regulators, and aligned with societal expectations regarding the use of animals in research. This paper provides an overview of the points to consider for any institution on the verge of implementing this concept, with emphasis given on database creation, risks, and discipline-specific perspectives.

A roadmap towards a human-centric safety assessment of advanced therapy medicinal products.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are among the most complex pharmaceuticals with high human specificity. Species differences severely limit the clinical relevance of in vivo data. We conducted interviews with stakeholders involved in ATMP development about their perspective on the use of in vivo studies, the perceived hurdles and associated potential solutions regarding non-clinical development of ATMPs. In total, 17 stakeholders from 9 different countries were interviewed. A workshop was held with key stakeholders to further discuss major topics identified from the interviews. Conducting in vivo studies remains the status quo for ATMPs development. The hurdles identified included determining the amount of information required before clinical entry and effective use of limited human samples to understand a treatment or for clinical monitoring. A number of key points defined the need for future in vivo studies as well as improved application and implementation of New Approach Methodology (NAM)-based approach for products within a well-known modality or technology platform. These included data transparency, understanding of the added value of in vivo studies, and continuous advancement, evaluation, and qualification of NAMs. Based on the outcome of the discussions, a roadmap with practical steps towards a human-centric safety assessment of ATMPs was established.

The need for guidance in antidepressant drug development: Revisiting the role of the forced swim test and tail suspension test.

Depressive disorders are one of the most common mental disorders globally and progress in treating these disorders has been hampered, in part, by a lack of suitable nonclinical efficacy tests. Two common tests used in nonclinical efficacy studies of antidepressants-the forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST)-have come under criticism in recent years for their inconsistency and lack of validity, yet they continue to be used in the pharmaceutical industry. In this review, we provide a rationale for why international pharmaceutical regulatory and guidance agencies should begin issuing direction on methods for non-clinical efficacy testing that traditionally use the FST and TST, particularly considering that some regulators, such as those in the U.S. and E.U., allow the authorization of clinical trials to proceed without requiring tests in animals. The area of antidepressant drug discovery represents an important opportunity for reducing the attrition of psychiatric drugs, harmonizing regulatory requirements, and reducing animal use. Specific recommendations for the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) have been provided.

The use of weight-of-evidence approaches to characterize developmental toxicity risk for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in humans without in vivo studies.

Regulatory guidance for global drug development relies on animal studies to evaluate safety risks for humans, including risk of reproductive toxicity. Weight-of-evidence approaches (WoE) are increasingly becoming acceptable to evaluate risk. A WoE for developmental risk of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was evaluated for its ability to retrospectively characterize risk and to determine the need for further in vivo testing based on the remaining uncertainty. Reproductive toxicity studies of 65 mAbs were reviewed and compared to the WoE. Developmental toxicities were absent in 52/65 (80%) mAbs. Lack of toxicity was correctly predicted in 29/52 (56%) cases. False positive and equivocal predictions were made in 9/52 (17%) and 14/52 (27%) cases. For 3/65 (5%) mAbs, the findings were equivocal. Of mAbs with developmental toxicity findings (10/65, 15%), the WoE correctly anticipated pharmacology based reproductive toxicity without any false negative predictions in 9/10 (90%) cases, and in the remaining case (1/10, 10%) an in vivo study was recommended due to equivocal WoE outcome. Therefore, this WoE approach could characterize presence and absence of developmental risk without animal studies. The current WoE could have reduced the need for developmental toxicity studies by 42% without loss of important patient information in the label.

Impact of microsampling on toxicological evaluation in rodent safety studies.

Recently, animal welfare has been attracting worldwide attention, and implementation of 3Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) is prioritized in every way possible in the drug development. Microsampling, in which small amounts of blood are collected, is attracting attention in this context. ICH S3A Q&A focused on microsampling was published in November 2017 to help accelerate the application of microsampling for toxicokinetic assessment. The increased sensitivity of drug measurement apparatuses such as mass spectrometers has made it possible to measure drug concentrations with small amounts of blood samples. In this review, we summarized the reports on toxicological influence of microsampling in rodents (rats and mice) with or without drug administration or recovery period after blood collection and influences that may arise from differences in the blood sampling site or blood sampling volume. We also summarized some perspectives on further implementation of microsampling in toxicology studies. The use of microsampling in regulatory toxicology studies has gradually increased, although at a lower rate than in discovery studies. Since more animals are used in GLP toxicology studies than in discovery studies, the effect of reducing the number of animals by microsampling is expected to be greater in the toxicology studies. This report aims to promote the application of microsampling to nonclinical studies, as it is beneficial for improving animal welfare and can contribute to the 3Rs.

Preclinical toxicity evaluation of novel antibacterial contezolid acefosamil in rats and dogs.

Contezolid acefosamil (CZA) is an intravenous prodrug of oxazolidinone antibiotic contezolid (CZD). It is being developed to treat infections due to Gram-positive bacteria including multidrug-resistant pathogens, while addressing myelosuppression and neurotoxicity limitations associated with long-term use of this class of antibiotics. In vivo, CZA is rapidly deacylated into its first metabolite MRX-1352, which is then dephosphorylated to release active drug CZD. Four-week repeat-dose toxicity studies of intravenous CZA were conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats (40, 80, and 160/120 mg/kg/dose twice a day [BID]) and beagle dogs (25, 50, and 100/75 mg/kg/dose BID). The high doses administered to both rats and dogs were adjusted due to adverse effects including decreased body weight and food consumption. Additionally, a dose-dependent transient reduction in erythrocyte levels was recorded at the end of dosing phase. Importantly, no myelosuppressive reduction in platelet counts was observed, in contrast to the myelosuppression documented for standard-of-care oxazolidinone linezolid. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of CZA was 80 and 25 mg/kg/dose BID in rats and dogs, respectively. Separately, 3-month neuropathological evaluation in Long-Evans rats (25, 37.5, and 50 mg/kg/dose, oral CZA, BID) demonstrated no neurotoxicity in the central, peripheral, and optical neurological systems. Toxicokinetic data from these studies revealed that CZD exposures at NOAELs were higher than or comparable with that for the intended clinical dose. These results confirm the favorable safety profile for CZA and support its clinical evaluation for long-term therapy of persistent Gram-positive infections, beyond the application for earlier oxazolidinones.