Aesthetic outcome of intermediate closure versus intermediate closure followed by 2-octyl cyanoacrylate: A randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgeons are increasingly using surgical adhesives in their practice. Studies comparing sutured wounds to those that utilize a combination of suturing and skin adhesive have not been previously conducted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic outcome and patient wound care satisfaction of an intermediate suture closure with an intermediate suture closure followed by the application of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA). METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-scar study. Following intermediate sutured closure of a surgical defect, one side of the wound was randomized to receive an additional application of 2-OCA. After 3 months, the scar was assessed using the POSAS tool and patients reported wound care preferences. RESULTS: As the primary outcome measure, the mean sum of observer POSAS was 12.80 for sutured closure alone versus 12.40 for sutured closures followed by 2-OCA (P = .49). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study of a relatively homogenous population. CONCLUSION: Although there were no significant differences in scar cosmesis, both patients and observers tended to prefer the side with an additional application of 2-OCA in most POSAS components, in overall opinion, and in patient wound care satisfaction. Dermatologic surgeons may add this to their practice without sacrificing scar outcomes or patient satisfaction.

Aesthetic outcome of running subcuticular suture versus running horizontal mattress suture in closure of linear wounds of the trunk and extremities: A randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Both running horizontal mattress (HM) and running subcuticular (SQ) suturing techniques have been suggested to be superior to other running cuticular suturing techniques. These 2 techniques have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE: To compare cosmetic outcomes between a running HM and a running SQ technique in a split scar model following linear closure of trunk and extremity defects. METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-scar study. One side of the surgical wound was randomized to receive one intervention (HM vs SQ) with the other side receiving the alternate intervention. The primary outcome was the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Observer POSAS sum of components was 19.49 and 17.76 for HM and SQ, respectively (P = .14). The mean score for patient overall opinion was 4.71 for HM and 3.50 for the SQ technique (P = .02). Overall opinion scores of evaluators were 3.87 and 3.29 for HM and SQ, respectively (P = .03). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study of a relatively homogenous population. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in the sum of POSAS components between HM and SQ (P = .14), both patients and evaluators had a superior overall opinion of the SQ-treated side (patient P = .02, evaluator P = .03).

The short-term outcomes of surgical scars in head and neck surgery comparing between surgical blade and geometric electron modulation electrocautery.

BACKGROUND: Scar formation after neck surgery is a frequent concern, impacting patients both physically and psychologically. Cosmetic appearance plays a crucial role in assessing surgical success. At present, the evolving medical technologies introduces innovations like Geometric Electron Modulation (GEM) electrocautery. GEM technology offers potential benefits such as reduced thermal injury and consistent heat emission during surgery compared to conventional electrocautery. OBJECTIVES: To compare the difference between postoperative neck scars from the surgical blade as the gold standard and geometric electron modulation electrocautery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled study was performed on the patients who were diagnosed with surgical conditions requiring neck surgery at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, from 2023 to 2024. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was utilized to assess scar appearance at 1 and 3 months following the surgery, and the amount of blood loss during incision was recorded. RESULTS: 22 patients were enrolled to this study. At 1-month follow-up, we saw significant difference between GEM (20.32 ± 4.11) and the surgical blade (23.27 ± 4.59) (P = 0.008) from POSAS, patient scale but no significant difference in doctor scale, (GEM 21.55 ± 7.34, surgical blade 24.27 ± 7.88, P = 0.155). At 3-month follow-up, there were no significant difference between the groups both doctor (GEM 16.45 ± 4.62, surgical blade 17.65 ± 4.50, P = 0.411) and patient scale (GEM 13.15 ± 2.96, surgical blade 14.05 ± 3.33, P = 0.328). CONCLUSION: GEM electrocautery had a superior scar outcome to a surgical blade at 1 month from the patient perspective. There was also significantly less blood loss in GEM compared with the surgical blade.

Effectiveness of Autologous Fat Grafting in the Treatment of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat transfer (AFT) has been proposed as a possible treatment for scar tissue and its associated symptoms. Its effectiveness's evidence is yet unidentified though. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the currently available evidence on the efficacy and safety of autologous fat transfer in treating post-burn and post-traumatic scars using a validated scar measurement tool. METHODS: This study performed a systematic literature review in November 2023 using the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), PUBMED, and Google Scholar. The following key terms were included: (Fat grafting OR Autologous fat transfer) AND (body scars OR body burns OR body wounds) AND (Efficacy OR Safety OR satisfaction). We evaluated articles according to predefined quality criteria. The following data were included during the extraction period: patient demographics, indications for AFT, the number of AFT sessions, follow-up periods, and changes in the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores, which contain both the patient and observer components. RESULTS: This study included 1326 patients and 23 published articles. A total of 14 prospective studies, 7 retrospective studies, and 2 Randomized clinical trials studies were evaluated. These 23 articles came from diverse global locations; the earliest was published in 1992, and the most recently published in 2022. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated significant enhancements in scar characteristics from both patient and observer perspectives. Overall, AFT holds promise as a valuable treatment option for scar-related conditions as it enhances scar quality ,contributing to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Impact of Scars After DIEP-Flap Breast Reconstruction on Satisfaction and HR-QoL: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing BREAST-Q Scores.

BACKGROUND: Although deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is the most widely used technique for autologous breast reconstruction, this technique leads to large scars in visible areas on breast and abdomen. So far, limited studies have thoroughly addressed the impact of breast and abdominal scars on satisfaction and Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QoL). OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to determine whether women with no/minor scar symptoms after undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction differ in satisfaction and perceived HR-QoL from women with symptomatic scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey study, women who had previously undergone DIEP-flap breast reconstruction completed an online survey. Patient-reported scar quality was assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and satisfaction and HR-QoL with BREAST-Q. Independent-samples t-tests were conducted to compare BREAST-Q scores between women with no/minor scar symptoms (POSAS overall opinion score 1-3) and women with symptomatic scars (POSAS overall opinion score 4-10). RESULTS: A total of 248 women completed the survey. Women with scar symptoms had significantly worse BREAST-Q scores on 'Satisfaction with breasts,' 'Physical well-being,' 'Psychosocial well-being' and, 'Sexual well-being' compared to women with no/minor scar symptoms (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: After DIEP-flap breast reconstructions, women with symptomatic breast and abdominal scars had a clinically relevant and statistically significant lower degree of satisfaction and HR-QoL compared to women who had no/minor scar symptoms. We therefore recommend to explicitly and repeatedly address inevitability of visible scars after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction, aiming to improve preoperative patient selection and post-operative expectation management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is widely used for measurements of scar quality. This encompasses visual, tactile and sensory characteristics of the scar. The Patient Scale of previous POSAS versions was lacking input from patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop the POSAS3.0, Patient Scale with involvement of adults patients with all scar types, complying with the highest clinimetric standards. METHODS: From February 2018 to April 2019, a series of six focus group interviews were performed in the Netherlands and Australia to identify scar quality characteristics that adults with scars consider to be important. All focus groups were transcribed, anonymized and analysed using a thematic analysis. Relevant characteristics were formulated into items, resulting in a Dutch and English version of the Patient Scale. These drafts were pilot tested in Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and refined accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 21 relevant scar quality characteristics were identified during the focus groups. Two distinct versions of the POSAS3.0, Patient Scale were developed. The Generic version contains 16 items and can be used for all scar types, except linear scars. The Linear Scar version of the Patient Scale contains the same 16 items, with an extra item referring to the widening of scar margins. All included items are rated on a verbal rating scale with five response options. CONCLUSION: Two versions of the POSAS3.0 Patient Scale were developed. Further field tests are being performed to establish the measurement properties and scoring algorithm of the scales.

Randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic results of midline incision versus off-midline incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colectomy.

PURPOSE: A notable advantage of laparoscopic colorectal surgery is that only a small incision at the extraction site is necessary, which is considered to be cosmetically beneficial. Meanwhile, the optimal extraction site for the resected specimen in laparoscopic colectomy is controversial in terms of cosmetic benefit. This randomized controlled trial compares midline and off-midline extraction sites in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer, with consideration of cosmetic benefits as the primary endpoint. METHODS: Included were patients that underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy at WMUH between October 2014 and February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to either midline incision group or off-midline incision group. Prospectively collected data included cosmetic results (patients and observer assessment scale) and complications including incidence of incisional hernia, SSI, and pain. This trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (UMIN000028943). RESULTS: Finally, 98 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the two groups in patient and observer assessment scales of cosmetic results (midline 8 ± 1.1 vs off-midline 11 ± 5.9 p = 0.16, midline 13.5 ± 6.6 vs off-midline 15 ± 11 p = 0.58, respectively) or in postoperative pain. However, incisional hernia occurred in four cases in the midline group (8%), which was significantly higher than that in the off-midline group (no cases, 0%). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of cosmetic benefit, the primary endpoint, between the two groups. In this study, only the extraction site location was compared; future studies will examine differences depending on the incisional direction, including the incidence of incisional hernia.

Evaluation of post-tracheostomy scars and their impact on persons' quality of life: A case-control study.

Tracheostomy is one of the more commonly performed procedures in critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Postoperative scarring is one of the bothersome sequelae of tracheostomies. Scars distort physical appearance, especially when found on the head and neck, which could have a negative impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate and assess the impact of post-tracheostomy scars on quality of life according to the tracheostomy method. A prospective, single-center, observational, case-control study was conducted. One hundred fifty-six persons with a post-tracheostomy surgical scar for more than four months were observed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire. Persons were divided into two groups depending on the method of tracheostomy, and the duration of the cannulated period was considered in both groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P values of <0.05 were considered significant. The patients who had a tracheostomic tube cannulation period of fewer than 15 days had better cosmetic results than those who had tracheostomic tubes for more than 15 days, regardless of the tracheostomy method: 6.64 ± 0.082 versus 16.15 ± 0.096 (P < 0.001) in the surgical tracheostomy group and 7.26 ± 0.211 versus 14.17 ± 0.379 (P < 0.05) in the percutaneous dilatational group. The Dermatology Life Quality Index scores had a mean value of 0.6 ± 0.01, which means that post-tracheostomy scarring in the present study had no effect on the person's quality of life. The aesthetic outcomes of post-tracheostomy scars after the open surgical tracheostomy technique did not significantly differ from those of the percutaneous dilatational technique in the present study. Persons with a long duration of tracheostomic tube ventilation showed worse aesthetic outcomes than those with short-term tracheostomic cannulation, which was not dependent on the tracheostomy technique. The Dermatology Life Quality Index showed that post-ttracheostomy scarring in the present study had no effect on the person's quality of life.

Aesthetic outcome of simple cuticular suture distance from the wound edge on the closure of linear wounds on the head and neck: A randomized evaluator blinded split-wound comparative effect trial.

BACKGROUND: Little data support the optimal distance of cuticular suture placement from the wound edge to achieve the most cosmetically appealing scar. OBJECTIVE: To compare Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores for cutaneous sutures spaced 2 mm versus 5 mm from the wound edge in head and neck defects repaired via linear closure. METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in this randomized, evaluator blinded, split-scar study. Surgical wounds were repaired with cuticular sutures 2 mm from the wound edge on one side and 5 mm on the other. POSAS scores and scar width were compared 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The sum observer POSAS score for this study had a mean (SD) of 16.06 (6.49) on the 2-mm side and 15.82 (6.83) on the 5-mm side (P = .807). Similarly, no difference was seen between scar width with a mean (SD) of 0.100 cm (0.058 cm) on the 2-mm side and with mean (SD) 0.100 cm (0.076 cm) on the 5-mm side (P = .967). LIMITATIONS: Linear repairs were studied on head and neck defects after extirpation of cutaneous malignancies, resulting in a homogeneous elderly white patient population. CONCLUSION: Cuticular sutures placed 2 or 5 mm from the wound edge did not result in different cosmetic outcomes in linear closures on the head and neck.

A clinical comparison of pure knitted silk and a complex synthetic skin substitute for the treatment of partial thickness burns.

Currently, many dressings are commercially available for the treatment of burn wounds. Some of these wound dressings remain on the wound, prevent painful dressing changes, and reduce tissue scarring. Nevertheless, still a wound dressing that is cost-effective, produces good wound healing properties, and has a high patient satisfaction is needed. Standard care of superficial burn wounds differs between burn centres. This study aimed to determine a dressing with easy appliance, accurate pain control, favourable outcome, and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, we compared the widely used but expensive Suprathel with the rather new but much cheaper Dressilk in the clinical setting. In a prospective clinical study, the healing of partial thickness burn wounds after simultaneous treatment with Suprathel and Dressilk was examined in 20 patients intra-individually. During wound healing, pain, infection, exudation, and bleeding were evaluated. A subjective scar evaluation was performed using the Patient and Observer Scar Scale. Both dressings were easy to apply, remained on the wound in place, and were gradually cut back as reepithelisation proceeded and showed similar times to wound closure. Dressing changes were not necessary, and neither infections nor bleeding was detected. Overall exudation and pain were highest in the beginning but declined during the wound-healing phase without significant differences. In the follow-up scar evaluation after 12 months, patients reported overall high satisfaction. Overall, the modern dressings Suprathel and Dressilk (solely made out of pure silk) led to safe wound healing without infection and rapidly reduced pain. There was no need for dressing changes, and they had similar clinical outcomes in scar evaluation. Therefore, both dressings seem to be ideal for the treatment of superficial burns. Because acquisition costs remain one of the main factors in the treatment of burns, Dressilk, which is ~20 times cheaper than Suprathel, remains a good option for the treatment of partial thickness burns.

Surgical wounds in reduction mammoplasty: a comparison of Monocryl and Prolene sutures on scars.

OBJECTIVE: The type of suture material affects the quality of scars. The aim of this study was to find the superior suture material for reduction mammoplasty between Prolene and Monocryl based on the comparison of scars. METHOD: A prospective observational study was conducted at a university-based hospital in Mashhad, Iran between October 2015 and September 2017. Monocryl and Prolene suture materials, used for closing the outermost layer in mammoplasty, were compared. Patients' incision scars were assessed objectively according to the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment (POSAS) criteria. The relevant CONSORT guideline was used for reporting this study. RESULTS: Seventy-eight women with a mean age of 36.8±9.5 years were entered into the study. The frequency of wound healing in both groups was 97.4% 1 month after surgery and by the third visit, 3 months after surgery, only one patient had a stretched scar. Moreover, wound inflammation in the first two visits was less frequent in the Prolene group that healed completely 3 months after surgery (after excluding the one patient with wide scar inflammation). The frequency of itching of the wound in the Monocryl group was 24.4%, 11.5% and 12.8% in the three follow-up visits, respectively, and the values for the Prolene group were 24.4%, 9.0% and 6.4%, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of wound healing, inflammation and itching (p>0.05). Overall, 94.8% of patients were satisfied with the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that there was no significant difference between Monocryl and Prolene. Hence, either of the two suture materials can be used for wound closure in reduction mammoplasty.

Outcome of purse-string versus linear skin closure after ileostomy stoma reversal in terms of stoma sites infection and cosmesis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of infection and patient satisfaction in terms of cosmesis between purse-string closure and the usual linear closure of stoma wound. METHODS: The experimental randomised clinical trial was conducted from December 2017 to December 2018 at the Surgical Unit 1, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised patients undergoing ileostomy stoma reversal. The patients were randomised into 2 groups using computer-generated random numbers. Group A underwent purse-string closure, while group B received linear closure. Both groups were followed post-operatively at 1 and 3 months for wound infection. Patient satisfaction was ascertained using standard tools. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients, there were 37(51.4%) in group A and 35(48.6%) in group B. Overall, there were 50(69.4%) males and 22(30.5%) females. Infection occurred in 2(5.4%) group A patients and in 8(22.8%) group B patients (p=0.023). Patients in group A were more satisfied at 3 months post-surgery than patients in group B (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Purse-string closure was found to be associated with a lower incidence of wound infection and higher patient satisfaction compared to linear closure.

Exploring the relation between the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort and pain and itching in a sample of burn patients.

BACKGROUND: The EQ-5D domain pain/discomfort (PD) uses one item to capture pain and other aspects of discomfort, like itching. This study explored how pain, itching and the EQ-5D-5L PD domain relate to each other in a sample of burn patients. METHODS: Adult burn patients completed the EQ-5D-5L and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 5-7 years after sustaining their injury. The POSAS includes a separate pain and an itching item. Spearman's correlation coefficient established the association between the EQ-5D-5L PD and the POSAS pain and itching item. With multivariable regression analysis the linear association between the POSAS pain and itching item and EQ-5D-5L PD domain was tested. RESULTS: Data from 245 patients were included. Mean EQ-5D-5L index value was 0.87 and 39.2% reported at least slight problems on the EQ-5D-5L PD domain. Most patients gave corresponding answers on the EQ-5D-5L PD domain and on the POSAS pain (73%) and itching (70%) item. Spearman correlation coefficients of the EQ-5D-5L PD domain with the POSAS pain and itching were 0.468 (p < 0.001) and 0.473 (p < 0.001), respectively. Among respondents with pain and without itching and respondents with itching and without pain, Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.585 (p = 0.076) and 0.408 (p = 0.001), respectively. POSAS pain (unstandardized Beta = 0.14) and POSAS itching (unstandardized Beta = 0.08) were significantly associated with EQ-5D-5L PD domain (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, in a sample of burn patients, pain and itching are captured by the broader EQ-5D-5L PD domain. The EQ-5D-5L PD domain can thus be used to assess pain and itching in relation to HRQL, but the POSAS pain and itching items are more sensitive. The EQ-5D-5L is, however, no replacement of the POSAS when the POSAS is used for its primary aim; assessment of scar quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR6407).

Scar quality examination comparing titanium-coated suture material and non-coated suture material on flap donor sites in reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: Wound healing and scar quality after trauma are subject to impairment through excessive wound healing, chronic wound or even surgical site infections. Optimizing the process of scar formation and skin healing is crucial in virtually all fields of medicine. In this regard, we tested the possible usage and advantages of titanium coated suture material. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational cohort study including 30 patients who underwent soft tissue reconstruction. One half of the donor flap site was sutured with titanium coated suture material, while the other half was closed with non-coated sutures. Scar quality of the donor flap site was assessed by photographs and POSAS scores on days 2-5, 14, 42, 72 and 180 postoperatively. RESULTS: No difference between the titanium coated sutures and non-coated sutures was seen in the POSAS assessment, neither for the patient scale at 14, 42, 72 and 180 days, nor for the observer scale on the same dates. Comorbidities like diabetes, chronic renal failure and smoking as well as the BMI of each patient affected the wound healing process to an equal degree on both sides of the suture. CONCLUSIONS: No difference between the titanium coated and non-titanium-coated suture material was seen in the POSAS assessment in regard to scar quality and wound healing. The titanium-coated suture material can be considered to be equally as effective and safe in all qualities as the non-titanium-coated suture material, even in patients with comorbidities. Clinical trial register This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the registration number DRKS00021767. ( https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021767 ).

Early intervention with non-ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring-A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laser treatment in the early phases of wound healing may reduce scar formation. However, little is known on when in the early wound healing phases laser exposure most optimally should be provided and at which fluence levels. This study investigates the clinical effect of non-ablative-fractional-laser (NAFL) performed at three early time points at a range of fluence levels versus untreated control scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled, intra-individual trial with erbium-glass 1,540 nm NAFL versus no laser treatment on sixteen subjects receiving 10 standardized full-thickness punch-biopsy wounds. A single NAFL-exposure was applied to test-wounds 1 day before, immediately after, or 2 weeks after wounding. Three fluence levels provided deep and superficial energy depositions (range 30-70 mJ/microbeam). Primary outcome comprised the total-score of the observer part of Patient-Observer-Scar-Assessment-Scale (POSAS), performed by blinded on-site assessment at 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were clinical evaluation on visual-analogue-scale (VAS), reflectance measurements, and histology. RESULTS: NAFL-treatment applied 1 day before, immediately after or 2 weeks after wounding had the potential to offer subtle but detectable improvement in clinical scar appearance compared to untreated controls. Thus, NAFL-exposure 1 day before wounding (POSAS-total: median of 15 vs. control-median of 16, P = 0.03, VAS: median 4.1 vs. control-median 5.5, P = 0.03, medium-fluence), as well as immediately-, and 2 weeks after wounding (POSAS-total: P ≤ 0.05, low-fluence) induced improvement compared to untreated controls. No significant differences in dyschromia were detected between NAFL-treated and control scars. Histology showed subtle changes towards more mature interwoven bundles of collagen in NAFL-treated scars as compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a single NAFL-treatment at low to medium fluence performed 1 day prior, or in the early phases of wound healing, may have the potential to optimize scar formation in full thickness wounds. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:28-36, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Disposable Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Bilateral Breast Reduction Mammoplasty Evaluating Surgical Site Complications and Scar Quality.

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for postsurgical incision treatment has demonstrated benefits. A prospective randomized study was developed including 32 patients who underwent bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty. Patients served as their own control and received NPWT to one breast and fixation strips to the other breast. METHODS: The primary outcome was the number of wound healing complications within 21 days when comparing NPWT treatment with fixation strips. The secondary outcome was aesthetic appearance and quality of scarring using questionnaires [visual analogue scale (VAS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)] scored at day 42-, 90-, 180- and 365-day follow-up using additional scar measurement modalities, such as viscoelasticity. RESULTS: For the 32 included patients, the number of wound complications was significantly lower (p < 0.004) for the NPWT treated sites compared to fixation strips. POSAS and VAS scores at 42 and 90 days revealed a significantly better quality of scarring in the NPWT treatment breasts than in fixation strips. At 180-day follow-up, there was a significant improvement in total VAS scores, as well as a comparable improvement in POSAS scores. No consistent significant improvement in scar quality was demonstrated with the assays that were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed less complications and a significant improvement in quality of scarring in favor of the NPWT-treated sites. The results indicate NPWT to be an attractive option for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Observer-blind randomized controlled study of a cosmetic blend of safflower, olive and other plant oils in the improvement of scar and striae appearance.

OBJECTIVE: The normal process of skin tissue repair following injury invariably results in visual scarring. It is known that topical treatment with hydrophobic cosmetics rich in silicone and mineral oil content can improve the appearance of scars and striae. Given lifestyle preferences of many cosmetic consumers towards so-called natural treatments, the objective of this controlled randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of a plant body oil rich in oleic and linoleic acids (Bio Skin Oil® ) for improving the appearance of scars and striae. METHODS: A panel of 80 volunteers with non-hypertrophic scars (40) or stretch marks (40) not older than 3 years applied a cosmetic face and body oil for 8 weeks. Compared to an untreated scar/stretch mark region, a blinded investigator as well as volunteer assessments with given observed parameters demonstrated the efficacy of the oil under test. RESULTS: On the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the mean score was reduced on the product-treated area by approximately 5% (P = 0.006). The untreated area remained unchanged. Observed effects by volunteers were more pronounced - Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) giving a reduction of approximately 20% on the treated area, and on the control untreated area a reduction of approximately 6%. The overall product effect of 14% was shown to be clearly significant (P = 0.001). All statements relating to product traits achieved higher frequencies of agreements than of non-agreements and were therefore assessed positively by the volunteers. Highest frequencies of agreements occurred in statements that the test product provides a long-lasting, soft and supple skin feeling (93%); caring effect (87%); and quick absorbance (84%). Agreement was also found for statements that the product improves the skin appearance (61%) and that scars/striae appear less pronounced (51%). Only 17% of volunteers felt the oil had no benefit to the appearance of their scars/striae. CONCLUSIONS: The oil blend under test is effective in improving the appearance of non-keloid scars and striae. Further work is required to understand the mechanisms of how plant oil fatty acids ameliorate scar and striae appearance.

Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies. METHODS: One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar. RESULTS: The patients in the MIA group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less drainage, a shorter scar length and a shorter duration of drainage than those in the CA group and the APA group. However, the operation time of 129.0 min in the MIA group was significantly longer than the 79.6 min in the CA group and the 77.0 min in the APA group. The best aesthetic score, as assessed by the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), was obtained in the APA group. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores were significantly lower in the APA group and CA group than in the MIA group. Significantly lower objective scar ratings were found in the APA group than in the other two groups. CONCLUSION: These results show that APA produced the best surgical outcomes in TC patients, indicating that conventional thyroidectomy can produce an ideal aesthetic result using the principles of aesthetic surgery. Thyroid surgery need not be performed through excessively short incisions for the sake of patient satisfaction with the scar's appearance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS on August 1st,2017 ( NCT03239769 ).

Aesthetic outcome and complications of simple interrupted versus running subcuticular sutures in facial surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The suturing technique and its associated complications could affect cosmetic outcome after facial surgery. Literature on this topic is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic results 12 months after treatment and complications associated with simple interrupted sutures (SIS) versus running subcuticular sutures (RSS) in facial surgery. METHODS: A randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed. Adults receiving dermatologic surgery on the face were randomized to receive SIS or RSS for wound closure. The primary outcome was the overall opinion score on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the complication rates and scores according to alternative methods for assessment of cosmetic outcome. The observer of cosmetic outcome was blinded to treatment assignment. RESULTS: 142 patients were randomized to receive SIS (n = 73) or RSS (n = 69). Twelve months after surgery, the median score of the overall opinion on the POSAS was 2.0 (range 1-8) according to the patients and 3.0 (range 1-8) according to the observer in both groups. In the RSS group, hyper- or hypoesthesia was reported more often. LIMITATIONS: The cosmetic result was assessed by 1 observer. CONCLUSION: SIS and RSS in facial surgery resulted in comparable cosmetic outcomes. RSS was more often associated with hyper- or hypoesthesia.

Fractional CO2 laser treatment of caesarean section scars-A randomized controlled split-scar trial with long term follow-up assessment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Caesarean section (c-section) scars can be pose functional and cosmetic challenges and ablative fractional laser (AFXL) treatment may offer benefit to patients. We evaluated textural and color changes over time in AFXL-treated versus untreated control scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled, intra-individual split-scar trial with three sessions of AFXL-treatments for mature c-section scars. Settings of AFXL were adjusted to each individual scar. End-points were blinded on-site clinical evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale [POSAS] and Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS]), blinded photo-evaluations, reflectance measurements, tissue histology, and patients satisfaction. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 patients completed the study. At 1 month follow-up, AFXL-treated scars were significantly improved in pliability (POSAS P = 0.01 VSS P = 0.02) and smoother in surface relief (POSAS P = 0.03) compared to control scars. At 1-3 months, overall scar appearance was dominated by transient erythema and hyperpigmentation, confirmed by reflectance measurements (erythema% and pigmentation% peaked at 1 and 3 month follow-up, respectively). At 6 months follow-up, AFXL-treated scars improved on POSAS-total score though not significantly (P = 0.06). Correspondingly, blinded photo-evaluation found AFXL-treated scars significantly improved compared to controls (VAS P = 0.02). Histology indicated new dermal collagen and elastic fibers on AFXL-treated scars. At 6 months follow-up, a majority of patients (64%) favored subsequent AFXL-treatment of their untreated control scar tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Scar remodeling is initiated 1 month after AFXL treatment, but overall scar improvement is concealed until laser-induced color changes resolve. At 6 months follow-up, the benefit of AFXL treatment on c-section scars emerges. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:189-197, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.