The predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Besides its primary clinical utility in predicting bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the PRECISE-DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy) score may also be useful for predicting long-term mortality in ACS patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) since several studies have reported an association between the score and certain cardiovascular conditions or events. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of the PRECISE-DAPT score for predicting the long-term all-cause mortality in patients (n = 293) with ACS presenting with CS. METHODS: The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for each patient who survived in hospital, and the association with long-term mortality was studied. Median follow-up time was 2.7 years. The performance of the final model was determined with measurements of its discriminative power (Harrell's and Uno's C indices and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and predictive accuracy (coefficient of determination [R2] and likelihood ratio χ2). Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the relationship between the variables of the model and long-term all-cause death. RESULTS: All-cause death occurred in 197 patients (67%). There was a positive association between the PRECISE-DAPT score (change from 17 to 38 was associated with an HR of 2.42 [95% CI: 1.59-3.68], R2 = 0.209, time-dependent AUC = 0.69) and the risk of death such that in the adjusted survival curve, the risk of mortality increased as the PRECISE-DAPT score increased. CONCLUSION: The PRECISE-DAPT score may be a useful easy-to-use tool for predicting long-term mortality in patients with ACS complicated by CS.

Usefulness of the PRECISE-DAPT score at differentiating between ticagrelor and prasugrel for dual antiplatelet therapy initiation.

As a part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), prasugrel or ticagrelor is prescribed along with aspirin to patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess if the PRECISE-DAPT score, which provides prediction of bleeding during DAPT, could be used to choose between prasugrel and ticagrelor for DAPT initiation. 181 patients out of which 71 received prasugrel and 110 received ticagrelor were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for everyone and was used to dichotomize patients into two subgroups (score <25 and ≥25). After balancing potential confounders in baseline characteristics of the subgroups using propensity scores, comparison of a composite outcome of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (4P-MACE) (i.e., cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or coronary revascularization due to stent thrombosis) and bleeding (any type as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) within 1-year post-PCI was performed among the subgroups using Cox proportional hazards regression. Prasugrel was associated with lower and comparatively higher 4P-MACE events in subgroups with score ≥25 (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77) and score <25 (HR: 3.58; 95% CI, 0.62-20.70) respectively. For bleeding outcome, prasugrel trended towards more clinical benefit for scores ≥25 (HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.10-1.93) than <25 (HR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.13-6.58). Therefore, prasugrel was associated with better clinical effectiveness and trended towards a lower bleeding risk compared to ticagrelor within 1-year post-PCI for those with a high PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25). This finding requires validation through larger studies.

Performance of the REACH, PARIS, BleeMACS, and PRECISE-DAPT scores for predicting 1-year bleeding events in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the REACH, PARIS, BleeMACS, and PRECISE-DAPT scores in Chinese patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. A total of 1911 patients undergoing coronary DES implantation were consecutively recruited and followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoints were BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding and BARC type 2,3, or 5 bleeding. The BleeMACS score and the PRECISE-DAPT score were significantly associated with 1-year incidence of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding, but not BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The discrimination of the PRECISE-DAPT score was moderate for BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (c-statistic = 0.633), while those of the REACH (c-statistic = 0.533), PARIS (c-statistic = 0.553), and BleeMACS scores (c-statistic = 0.613) were relatively low. However, the analysis of c-statistic, NRI, and IDI detected no significant discrimination improvement of the PRECISE-DAPT score for BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding compared to the other three scores. The calibrations of the PRECISE-DAPT and BleeMACS scores were modest (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p > .05). Decision curve analysis indicated net benefit of the PRECISE-DAPT score in bleeding risk evaluation. In conclusion, the PRECISE-DAPT score performed moderately in predicting BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding, while the discriminative capacities of the REACH, PARIS, BleeMACS scores were relatively low in patients undergoing DES implantation. But no significant discrimination improvement of the PRECISE-DAPT score compared to the other scores could be detected. Further studies are required to develop standardized bleeding risk scores for this population.

Predictive Ability of Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: This observational study validated Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria and the Predicting Bleeding Complication in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods and Results:Risk clusters of 939 STEMI patients with traceable 1-year outcomes were assessed according to ARC-HBR criteria and PRECISE-DAPT score. The diagnostic accuracy and first-year probability of bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5, according to risk cluster were assessed. Of all patients, 42.9% and 46.8% were classified as HBR (ARC-HBR criteria) and at high risk (PRECISE-DAPT score), respectively, and bleeding events were observed in 13.7% and 16.2% of these patients. The C-statistic for ARC-HBR criteria and the PRECISEDAPT score was 0.60 and 0.69, respectively (P<0.01). Patients with mechanical hemodynamic support devices had high bleeding rates, even in the non-HBR group (22.6%), and excluding these patients improved the C-statistics, making them equivalent between the 2 models (0.72 vs. 0.74; P=0.53). Bleeding event probabilities (95% confidence intervals) were equivalent in high-risk patients in the 2 models (0.12 [0.09-0.16] vs. 0.12 [0.08-0.16]). CONCLUSIONS: After exclusion of patients with mechanical devices, who had high bleeding event rates regardless of risk cluster, both ARC-HBR criteria and the PRECISE-DAPT score had high predictive ability.

Bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a Turkish population: Results from the Turkish Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (TACSER) study.

OBJECTIVE: Bleeding is one of the most important causes of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study therefore aimed to investigate bleeding risk in patients with ACS who were scheduled to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in Turkey. METHODS: This was a multicentre, observational, cross-sectional cohort study. The study population included 963 patients with ACS from 12 centres in Turkey. We used the Predicting Bleeding Complication in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score to predict the bleeding risk for all the patients. The patients were divided into high (≥25) or low (˂25) bleeding risk groups based on their PRECISE-DAPT scores. RESULTS: The mean PRECISE-DAPT score was 21.9. Overall, 32.2% of the patients had high PRECISE-DAPT scores (≥25). Compared with the male patients, the female patients had higher PRECISE-DAPT scores (28.2 ± 15.7 vs 18.4 ± 13.6, P Ë‚ .001). Among the females, the rate of patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 was 53%, while among the male patients, the score occurred at a rate of 22%. The female patients had lower haemoglobin (Hb) levels than the male patients (12.1 ± 1.7 vs 13.8 ± 1.9, P Ë‚ .001) and lower creatinine clearance (70.7 ± 27.5 vs 88.7 ± 26.3, P Ë‚ .001). The in-hospital bleeding rates were higher among the patients with high PRECISE-DAPT scores than among those who did not have high scores. Furthermore, the patients with high PRECISE-DAPT scores had a higher in-hospital mortality rate compared with those with low PRECISE-DAPT scores (1% vs 0%, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: The mean PRECISE-DAPT score was high among the patients with ACS in this study, indicating that the bleeding tendency was high. This study showed that the PRECISE-DAPT score may help physicians determine the type and duration of DAPT, especially in patients with ACS in Turkey.

Predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may co-exist in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In patients with NSTEMI, AF should therefore be regarded as an important risk factor irrespective of its presentation. To predict outcomes in AF patients presenting with NSTEMI, early risk stratification can help to identify the patients with a possible poor long-term prognosis. The development of the PRECISE-DAPT score aimed to predict the risk of bleeding in patients who underwent stent implantation and received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), providing a valuable tool for assessing bleeding risk in this specific patient population. Aim: To assess the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting long-term prognosis in AF patients with NSTEMI. Material and methods: Five hundred and twenty-six consecutive AF patients presenting with NSTEMI were included in the present study. The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated in each case and evaluated for the association of increased mortality in the study population, who survived in-hospital but died in the long term. Results: All-cause mortality deaths occurred in 278 (52.6%) patients. Higher PRECISE-DAPT score, shorter duration of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) were all associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the multivariable logistic regression model. Conclusions: High PRECISE-DAPT score was associated with higher long-term all-cause mortality in AF patients presenting with NSTEMI.

The value of PRECISE-DAPT score and lesion complexity for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with NSTEMI.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic effects of stroke risk scores (SRS), SYNTAX score (SX score), and PRECISE-DAPT score on mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Three hundred forty-three patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of NSTEMI and underwent coronary angiography (CAG) between January 1, 2022, and June 1, 2022, were included retrospectively in this single-center study. Patients' demographic, clinical and routine biochemical parameters were recorded. The scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, SX score, PRECISE-DAPT) of each patient were calculated. Participants were then divided into two groups by in-hospital status; all-cause mortality (+) and all-cause mortality (-). RESULTS: Overall, the mean age was 63.5 ± 11.8 years, of whom 63.3% (n = 217) were male. In-hospital mortality occurred in 31 (9.3%) patients. In the study population, those who died had significantly higher SX (p < 0.001), PRECISE-DAPT (p < 0.001), and ATRIA (p = 0.002) scores than those who survived. In logistic regression analysis, PRECISE-DAPT score [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.063, 95% CI 1.014-1.115; p = 0.012] and SX score [OR: 1.061, 95% CI 1.015-1.109, p = 0.009] were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality among NSTEMI patients. In ROC analysis, the PRECISE-DAPT score performed better discriminative ability than the SX score in determining in-hospital mortality [Area under the curve = 0.706, 95% CI 0.597-0.814; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: During the hospital stay, both PRECISE-DAPT and SX scores showed better performance than SRS in predicting all-cause mortality among NSTEMI patients undergoing CAG. Aside from their primary purpose, both scores might be useful in determining risk stratification for such patient populations.

The Association of a PRECISE-DAPT Score With No-Reflow in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

This study aimed to evaluate the association of admission PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score with the development of no-reflow (NR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational, retrospective study, 335 consecutive STEMI patients who were treated with primary PCI were included. We classified the study population into 2 groups: patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25 and those with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25. Overall, 30 (8.9%) patients developed NR. The mean PRECISE-DAPT score (20.03 ± 15.32 vs 11.33 ± 12.18; P = .005) was significantly higher in cases who developed NR. Moreover, arrhythmic complications, in-hospital shock, and in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 compared to those with a PRECISE-DAPT score <25. According to a multivariable analysis, the PRECISE-DAPT score was found to be independently linked with NR (odds ratio: 2.87, with P = .015). To our knowledge, these data are the first in major medical science databases to determine the relationship between the PRECISE-DAPT score and the NR phenomenon in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

The association of PRECISE-DAPT score with thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of intracoronary thrombus is associated with adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). PRECISE-DAPT score is used to detect the bleeding risk in STEMI patients who are on dual antiplatelet therapy. Recently, the PRECISE-DAPT score was shown to be related to cardiovascular events. We aimed to investigate the association of PRECISE-DAPT score with thrombus burden in patients with STEMI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis with 204 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention was conducted in this study. Thrombus burden grade and PRECISE-DAPT score were calculated for each subject. Patients were divided into two groups as high thrombus burden (HTB) (grade 4, 5) and low thrombus burden (LTB) (grade 1, 2 and 3) based on thrombus burden grade. The PRECISE-DAPT scores were compared between thrombus burden groups. RESULTS: The mean age in HTB (N = 136) was 63.7 (11.3), and 64.7% were male. HTB had a higher PRECISE-DAPT score than LTB (p < .0001). PRECISE-DAPT score, baseline troponin I levels, ejection fraction, and pain to balloon time were independent predictors of HTB. CONCLUSIONS: PRECISE-DAPT score was an independent predictor of HTB in patients with STEMI.

The PRECISE-DAPT score and 5-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a large-scale, real-world study from China.

AIMS: The PRECISE-DAPT (predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual-antiplatelet therapy) score is recommended by guidelines for predicting out-of-hospital bleeding in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the long-term prognostic value of the PRECISE-DAPT score in patients after PCI remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective study of 10 724 patients who underwent PCI throughout 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. The bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The ischaemic endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). After a 5-year follow-up, 10 109 patients were finally analysed. A total of 415 (4.11%) patients experienced bleeding, 364 (3.60%) experienced all-cause death, and 2049 (20.27%) had MACCE. Using Cox regression, the risks of bleeding [hazard ratio (HR): 1.721, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.180-2.511, P = 0.005], MACCE (HR: 1.607, 95% CI: 1.347-1.917, P < 0.001), and all-cause-death (HR: 3.902, 95% CI: 2.916-5.221, P < 0.001) in patients with a high score were significantly higher than those in patients with a low score. The PRECISE-DAPT score showed prognostic value for 5-year events of bleeding (C-statistic: 0.566, 95% CI: 0.537-0.594), MACCE (C-statistic: 0.540, 95% CI: 0.527-0.553), and all-cause death (C-statistic: 0.673, 95% CI: 0.644-0.702). CONCLUSION: After 5 years of follow-up, the PRECISE-DAPT score has a statistically significant predictive value for long-term bleeding events in the Chinese PCI population, and also some prognostic value for death and MACCE. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: In this real-world, large-sample study, the PRECISE-DAPT (predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual-antiplatelet therapy) score shows a statistically significant 5-year predictive value for bleeding in Chinese patients with percutaneous coronary intervention and dual-antiplatelet therapy. The study also shows that the PRECISE-DAPT score has moderate predictive value for all-cause death.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Antiplatelet Therapy-Related Bleeding Complications Among Elderly Patients After Coronary Stenting: A Multicenter Retrospective Observation.

Purpose: To determine the incidence and risk factors of bleeding events as well as assess the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in elderly patients (≥75 years) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and one-year dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods: A total of 940 patients (≥75 years) who received PCI and one-year DAPT were retrospectively enrolled into the study. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors of antiplatelet-related bleeding complications. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Delong test were performed to obtain the optimized PRECISE-DAPT score. Results: It was observed that 89 (9.47%) patients suffered bleeding complications, while 37 (3.94%) of them had the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC, type ≥2) bleeding events. We stratified the PRECISE-DAPT score in tertiles (T1: ≤23; T2:24 to 32; T3: ≥33) and found that BARC ≥ 2 type bleeding occurred more frequently in T3 than in T1 and T2 (8.25 vs. 1.46% vs. 2.40%, p <0.05). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the PRECISE-DAPT score cutoff for BARC ≥2 type bleeding prediction was 33. In comparison with the current recommended cutoff score of 25 (AUC: 0.608, based on ROC analysis), the Delong test indicated significantly improved ability for predicting BARC ≥ 2 type bleeding events using the proposed cutoff value of 33, AUC of 0.676 (p = 0.03), and Brier Score of 0.04. The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 33 [OR: 3.772; 95% CI (1.229, 11.578); p = 0.02] was associated with BARC ≥ 2 type bleeding event, along with a history of hemorrhagic stroke [OR: 6.806; 95% CI (1.465, 31.613); p = 0.014], peptic ulcer [OR: 3.871; 95% CI (1.378, 10.871); p = 0.01], and/or myocardial infarction [MI, OR: 3.081; 95% CI (1.140, 8.326); p = 0.027]. Conclusion: A higher PRECISE-DAPT score of 33 might be a more reasonable cutoff value for predicting BARC ≥2 type bleeding risk in CAD patients (≥75 years). In addition, the history of hemorrhagic stroke, peptic ulcer, and myocardial infarction were identified as the risk factors of BARC ≥2 type bleeding events.

The clinical value of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score predicts the risk of bleeding in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Although the PRECISE-DAPT score is expected to be useful beyond its original field, long-term prognostic value of this score in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting the long-term prognosis in patients with AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive 552 patients with AMI, who had been discharged from our institution, were enrolled. We divided the patients into three groups, based on their PRECISE-DAPT scores: the low (PRECISE-DAPT < 17), intermediate (17-24) and high (≥25) score groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean follow-up 1424 days) revealed that all-cause mortality increased most steeply in the high score group followed by the intermediate and low score groups (P < 0.001). After adjusting for possible confounding factors, mortality of the intermediate or high score groups were higher than those of low score group (HR 2.945, 95% CI 1.182-7.237, P = 0.020, and HR 5.567, 95% CI 2.644-11.721, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AMI, a high PRECISE-DAPT score was associated with higher long-term all-cause mortality. PRECISE-DAPT score is useful for predicting all-cause mortality, as well as risk stratification of bleeding.

The Predictive Value of PRECISE-DAPT Score for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The PREdicting bleeding Complications In patients undergoing Stent implantation and subsEquent Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score predicts the bleeding risk in patients treated with dual antiplatelet treatment after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This study aimed to determine the predictive value of the admission PRECISE-DAPT score for in-hospital mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with pPCI. Of the 1418 patients enrolled, the study population was divided into 2 groups: PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 and PRECISE-DAPT score <25. The primary goal was to determine the incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients whose PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25 compared with the patients whose PRECISE-DAPT score <25 (9.4 vs 0.9%; P < .001, respectively). Both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that the PRECISE-DAPT score is independently associated with in-hospital mortality (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.043, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.084; P = .035; and HR: 1.026, 95% CI: 1.004-1.048; P = .021, respectively). A pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the predictive value of the PRECISE-DAPT score with regard to in-hospital mortality was noninferior compared with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score. The PRECISE-DAPT score may be a significant independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI treated with pPCI.

The association of PRECISE-DAPT score with development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Given that parameters used in the calculation of the PRECISE-DAPT risk score are important contributors to contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) development, we hypothesized that the PRECISE-DAPT risk score would show good accuracy for predicting CIN in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the predictive value of the admission PRECISE-DAPT score for the occurrence of CIN in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. After evaluation regarding with exclusion criteria, 1280 patients were, respectively, enrolled in the study. The primary end-point was the incidence of CIN. The PRECISE-DAPT score of CIN group was higher than the non-CIN group [31 (24-41) vs. 14 (9-23), p < 0.001, respectively]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, PRECISE-DAPT score was independently associated with the development of CIN [odds ratio (OR) 1.090, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.066-1.114, p < 0.001]. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was drawn to show the best cut-off value of the PRECISE-DAPT score to predict CIN was ≥ 21 with 81.3% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity [area under curve (AUC): 0.834; 95% CI 0.812-0.854; p = 0.017]. The PRECISE-DAPT score may be a significant independent predictor of CIN in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. Therefore, follow-up of patients with higher PRECISE-DAPT score should be performed more cautiously, and it should be noted that the development of CIN risk of these patients group is high.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary Stenting.

BACKGROUND: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with higher ischemic risk, which can be mitigated by long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, concomitant high bleeding risk (HBR) may be present, making it unclear whether short- or long-term DAPT should be prioritized. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effects of ischemic (by PCI complexity) and bleeding (by PRECISE-DAPT [PREdicting bleeding Complications in patients undergoing stent Implantation and SubsequEnt Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy] score) risks on clinical outcomes and on the impact of DAPT duration after coronary stenting. METHODS: Complex PCI was defined as ≥3 stents implanted and/or ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation stenting and/or stent length >60 mm, and/or chronic total occlusion revascularization. Ischemic and bleeding outcomes in high (≥25) or non-high (<25) PRECISE-DAPT strata were evaluated based on randomly allocated duration of DAPT. RESULTS: Among 14,963 patients from 8 randomized trials, 3,118 underwent complex PCI and experienced a higher rate of ischemic, but not bleeding, events. Long-term DAPT in non-HBR patients reduced ischemic events in both complex (absolute risk difference: -3.86%; 95% confidence interval: -7.71 to +0.06) and noncomplex PCI strata (absolute risk difference: -1.14%; 95% confidence interval: -2.26 to -0.02), but not among HBR patients, regardless of complex PCI features. The bleeding risk according to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction scale was increased by long-term DAPT only in HBR patients, regardless of PCI complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent complex PCI had a higher risk of ischemic events, but benefitted from long-term DAPT only if HBR features were not present. These data suggested that when concordant, bleeding, more than ischemic risk, should inform decision-making on the duration of DAPT.