Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 188: 109883, 2020 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704328

ABSTRACT

In order to develop an understanding of the role of adjuvants in a popular glyphosate-based herbicide - Roundup® Concentrate Plus (RCP), on non-target organisms, the effects of pure glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)-glycine], RCP and a non-ionic surfactant - polyethoxylated tallowamine (POEA) were studied in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Acute exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of RCP (15 µg/mL) and POEA (45 µg/mL) reduced (p < 0.001) lifespan of female flies compared to untreated controls or glyphosate (100 µg/mL). Negative geotaxis responses in female flies were reduced (p < 0.05) following acute exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of RCP and POEA whereas glyphosate did not significantly affect this response compared to untreated flies. Acute exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of RCP and POEA elevated (p < 0.05) protein carbonyl levels while markedly (p < 0.01) inhibiting carbonyl reductase activity whereas glyphosate treatment did not significantly affect protein carbonyl levels or carbonyl reductase activity. Fecundity was reduced (p < 0.05) following exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of RCP and POEA whereas glyphosate did not affect fecundity. In vitro treatment of ovarian stem sheath (OSS) cells with sub-lethal concentrations of RCP and POEA revealed decreased cell viability and enhanced caspase activity indicative of pro-apoptotic processes after 48 h compared to untreated controls. Glyphosate however was non-toxic at the concentration used. The results suggest that RCP and the surfactant POEA are more toxic than pure glyphosate and inhibit fecundity in Drosophila by impairing cell viability through enhanced apoptosis.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Drosophila melanogaster/drug effects , Herbicides/toxicity , Polyethylene Glycols/toxicity , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Line , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Glycine/toxicity , Longevity/drug effects , Glyphosate
2.
Toxicol Mech Methods ; 26(4): 270-5, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098016

ABSTRACT

Safety assessment evaluating the presence of impurities, residual materials, and contaminants in vaccines is a focus of current research. Thresholds of toxicological concern (TTCs) are mathematically modeled levels used for assessing the safety of many food and medication constituents. In this study, six algorithms are selected from the open-access ToxTree software program to derive a method for calculating TTCs for vaccine constituents: In Vivo Rodent Micronucleus assay/LD50, Benigni-Bossa/LD50, Cramer Extended/LD50, In Vivo Rodent Micronucleus assay/TDLo, Benigni-Bossa/TDLo, and the Cramer Extended/TDLo. Using an initial dataset (n = 197) taken from INCHEM, RepDose, RTECS, and TOXNET, the chemicals were divided into two families: "positive" - based on the presence of structures associated with adverse outcomes, or "negative" - no such structures or having structures that appear to be protective of health. The final validation indicated that the Benigni-Bossa/LD50 method is the most appropriate for calculating TTCs for vaccine constituents. Final TTCs were designated as 18.06 µg/person and 20.61 µg/person for the Benigni-Bossa/LD50 positive and negative structural families, respectively.


Subject(s)
Drug Contamination , Models, Theoretical , Software , Toxicology/methods , Vaccines/chemistry , Vaccines/toxicity , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/chemistry , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Algorithms , Lethal Dose 50 , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/chemistry , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/toxicity , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
3.
Int J Toxicol ; 33(1): 29-38, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24434723

ABSTRACT

In the present study, the effects on oxidative balance and cellular end points of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), and a glyphosate formulation (G formulation) were examined in HepG2 cell line, at dilution levels far below agricultural recommendations. Our results show that G formulation had toxic effects while no effects were found with acid glyphosate and AMPA treatments. Glyphosate formulation exposure produced an increase in reactive oxygen species, nitrotyrosine formation, superoxide dismutase activity, and glutathione (GSH) levels, while no effects were observed for catalase and GSH-S-transferase activities. Also, G formulation triggered caspase 3/7 activation and hence induced apoptosis pathway in this cell line. Aminomethylphosphonic acid exposure produced an increase in GSH levels while no differences were observed in other antioxidant parameters. No effects were observed when the cells were exposed to acid glyphosate. These results confirm that G formulations have adjuvants working together with the active ingredient and causing toxic effects that are not seen with acid glyphosate.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Apoptosis/drug effects , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Herbicides/toxicity , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Up-Regulation/drug effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Drug Synergism , Glutathione/agonists , Glutathione/metabolism , Glycine/toxicity , Hep G2 Cells , Hepatocytes/cytology , Hepatocytes/metabolism , Herbicides/chemistry , Humans , Isoxazoles , Lethal Dose 50 , Organophosphonates/toxicity , Osmolar Concentration , Oxidation-Reduction , Reactive Oxygen Species/agonists , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Superoxide Dismutase/chemistry , Superoxide Dismutase/metabolism , Tetrazoles , Tyrosine/agonists , Tyrosine/analogs & derivatives , Tyrosine/metabolism , Glyphosate
4.
J Econ Entomol ; 106(5): 1952-7, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24224234

ABSTRACT

Commercial producers of honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.) have reported unexplained loss of immature queens during the larval or pupal stage. Many affected queen-rearing operations are situated among the almond orchards of California and report these losses in weeks after almond trees bloom. Almond flowers are a rich foraging resource for bees, but are often treated with fungicides, insecticides, and spray adjuvants during bloom. Anecdotal reports by queen producers associate problems in queen development with application of the fungicide Pristine (boscalid and pyraclostrobin) and spray adjuvants that are tank-mixed with it. To test the effect of these compounds on queen development, a new bioassay was developed in which queens are reared in closed swarm boxes for 4 d, until capping, with nurse bees fed exclusively on artificially contaminated pollen. Pollen was treated with four concentrations of formulated Pristine (0.4, 4, 40, and 400 ppm), a spray adjuvant (Break-Thru, 200 ppm), the combination of Pristine and spray adjuvant (400:200 ppm), the insect growth regulator insecticide diflubenzuron (100 ppm) as a positive control, or water as negative control. Chemical analysis revealed that low concentrations of pyraclostrobin (50 ppb), but no boscalid, were detectable in royal jelly secreted by nurse bees feeding on treated pollen. No significant difference in queen development or survival was observed between any of the experimental treatments and the negative control. Only diflubenzuron, the positive control, caused a substantial reduction in survival of immature queens.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Bees/drug effects , Biphenyl Compounds/toxicity , Carbamates/toxicity , Fungicides, Industrial/toxicity , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Organosilicon Compounds/toxicity , Pyrazoles/toxicity , Animals , Bees/growth & development , Bees/physiology , California , Diflubenzuron/pharmacology , Female , Insecticides/pharmacology , Juvenile Hormones/pharmacology , Larva/drug effects , Larva/growth & development , Larva/physiology , Niacinamide/toxicity , Strobilurins
5.
Drug Chem Toxicol ; 35(3): 310-5, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22292413

ABSTRACT

Biofilm formation is a ubiquitous bacterial defense mechanism and has been shown to be a primary element in the antibiotic resistance of many human diseases, especially in the case of nosocomial infections. Recently, we have developed several compound libraries that are extremely effective at both dispersing preexisting biofilms and also inhibiting their initial formation. In addition to their antibiofilm properties, some of these molecules are able to resensitize resistant bacterial strains to previously ineffective antibiotics and are being assessed as adjuvants. In this study, we evaluated the toxic effects of three of our most effective 2-aminoimidazole compounds (dihydrosventrin, RA, and SPAR) using a rapid pipeline that combines a series of assays. A methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium assay, using the HaCaT keratinocyte cell line was used to determine epidermal irritants and was combined with Caenorhabditis elegans fecundity assays that demonstrated the effects of environmental exposure to various concentrations of these molecules. In each case, the assays showed that the compounds did not exhibit toxicity until they reached well above their current biofilm dispersion/inhibition concentrations. The most effective antibiofilm compound also had significant effects when used in conjunction with several standard antibiotics against resistant bacteria. Consequently, it was further investigated using the C. elegans assay in combination with different antibiotics and was found to maintain the same low level of toxicity as when acting alone, bolstering its candidacy for further testing as an adjuvant.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Anti-Bacterial Agents/toxicity , Biofilms/drug effects , Environmental Exposure , Imidazoles/toxicity , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Caenorhabditis elegans , Cell Line , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fertility/drug effects , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Keratinocytes/metabolism , Tetrazolium Salts , Thiazoles , Toxicity Tests
6.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(1): 16-21, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611133

ABSTRACT

French people have never been so wary about vaccines. The use of aluminum salts in vaccine adjuvants to enhance effectiveness is one of the major reasons for this lack of confidence. The direct toxicity of aluminum is often put forward. Direct toxicity of aluminum has long been known-especially with occupational exposure-to be associated with characteristic clinical manifestations and increased blood aluminum level. Intoxication related to the excessive amount of an element in the body, whether be it lead poisoning following exposure to lead or mercury poisoning for instance, is always associated with metal increase in biological media. To date no link has been established between the direct toxicity of aluminum and vaccines. Aluminum levels in biological media of vaccinated subjects are not different from those of unvaccinated subjects. This is consistent with the very small amount of aluminum contained in one dose of vaccine. Indirect toxicity of aluminum was suggested to explain macrophagic myofasciitis in humans in 2011, a disease that could be mediated by an autoimmune/autoinflammatory mechanism. This hypothesis has recently been refuted in a large pharmaco-epidemiological study proving that aluminum-containing adjuvants of vaccines are not responsible for this autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Aluminum/toxicity , Vaccines/adverse effects , Aluminum/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Salts
7.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232987, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32407399

ABSTRACT

Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are important agents of urinary tract infections that can often evolve to severe infections. The rise of antibiotic-resistant strains has driven the search for novel therapies to replace the use or act as adjuvants of antibiotics. In this context, plant-derived compounds have been widely investigated. Cuminaldehyde is suggested as the major antimicrobial compound of the cumin seed essential oil. However, this effect is not fully understood. Herein, we investigated the in silico and in vitro activities of cuminaldehyde, as well as its ability to potentiate ciprofloxacin effects against S. aureus and E. coli. In silico analyses were performed by using different computational tools. The PASS online and SwissADME programmes were used for the prediction of biological activities and oral bioavailability of cuminaldehyde. For analysis of the possible toxic effects and the theoretical pharmacokinetic parameters of the compound, the Osiris, SwissADME and PROTOX programmes were used. Estimations of cuminaldehyde gastrointestinal absorption, blood brain barrier permeability and skin permeation by using SwissADME; and drug likeness and score by using Osiris, were also evaluated The in vitro antimicrobial effects of cuminaldehyde were determined by using microdilution, biofilm formation and time-kill assays. In silico analysis indicated that cuminaldehyde may act as an antimicrobial and as a membrane permeability enhancer. It was suggested to be highly absorbable by the gastrointestinal tract and likely to cross the blood brain barrier. Also, irritative and harmful effects were predicted for cuminaldehyde if swallowed at its LD50. Good oral bioavailability and drug score were also found for this compound. Cuminaldehyde presented antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effects against S. aureus and E. coli.. When co-incubated with ciprofloxacin, it enhanced the antibiotic antimicrobial and anti-biofilm actions. We suggest that cuminaldehyde may be useful as an adjuvant therapy to ciprofloxacin in S. aureus and E. coli-induced infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Benzaldehydes/administration & dosage , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Cymenes/administration & dosage , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/pharmacokinetics , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Administration, Oral , Benzaldehydes/pharmacokinetics , Benzaldehydes/toxicity , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Biological Availability , Computer Simulation , Cymenes/pharmacokinetics , Cymenes/toxicity , Drug Synergism , Escherichia coli/pathogenicity , Escherichia coli/physiology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
8.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 72(15-16): 930-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672761

ABSTRACT

The aerial spray program for the eradication of coca in Colombia uses Glyphos, a local formulation of glyphosate tank-mixed with an adjuvant product, Cosmo-Flux. There are some potential risks to amphibians from direct overspraying of shallow waters. In order to evaluate potential alternative mixtures, a field experiment was conducted at the Center of National Training of Police Operations in Tolima province, Colombia. Plants of coca were established with irrigation and grown to 75 cm tall. A randomized split-plot design experiment was laid out and sprayed with a range of glyphosate formulations and different adjuvants using an experimental ground sprayer. Assessments were made of plant vigor, height, and above-ground standing crop (fresh weight) 3 wk after application. Resprouting of plants was assessed at 9 wk after treatment. Unformulated glyphosate applied as the product Rodeo gave poorer control of coca than two formulated products, Roundup Biactive (from Europe) and Colombian Glyphos. In general, these products performed well without added adjuvants, giving control similar to that of the eradication mixture with Cosmo-Flux. There was some evidence that addition of the adjuvant Silwet L-77 and to a lesser extent Mixture B (from the United Kingdom) gave more rapid herbicide symptoms. There were also indications that glyphosate rates of less than 3.69 kg acid equivalents (a.e.)/ha could give control in the range of 95%. Depending on the environmental risk requirements, the experiment indicates that, should other spray mixtures be required, there are potential alternatives. These would require extensive field testing to cover different environmental conditions, different coca varieties, and particularly aerial application, prior to a recommendation. Should the glyphosate product require changing, Roundup Biactive may be considered. Should the adjuvant require changing, then on the basis of this research, Silwet L-77 and Mixture B would be good candidates for further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Coca/drug effects , Defoliants, Chemical/toxicity , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Aircraft , Coca/growth & development , Colombia , Drug Compounding/methods , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Glycine/toxicity , Organosilicon Compounds/toxicity , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Glyphosate
9.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 72(15-16): 937-48, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672762

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the cumulative multifactorial physical and chemical impacts resulting from coca production on amphibian populations in comparison with the potential impacts produced by the herbicide glyphosate (Glyphos), which, mixed with the surfactant Cosmo-Flux, is used in the spray control program for illicit crops in Colombia. Using similar worst-case assumptions for exposure, several other pesticides used for coca production, including mancozeb, lambda cyhalothrin, endosulfan, diazinon, malathion, and chlorpyrifos, were up to 10- to 100-fold more toxic to frogs than the Glyphos-Cosmo-Flux mixture. Comparing hazard quotients based on application rates, several of these compounds demonstrated hazards 3-383 times that of formulated glyphosate. Secondary effects, particularly of insecticides, are also a concern, as these agents selectively target the primary food source of amphibians, which may indirectly impact growth and development. Although the potential chemical impacts by other pesticides are considerable, physical activities associated with coca production, particularly deforestation of primary forests for new coca plots, portend the greatest hazard to amphibian populations. The entire production cycle of cocaine has been linked to ecosystem degradation. The clearing of pristine forests for coca propagation in Colombia is well documented, and some of these regions coincide with those that contain exceptional amphibian biodiversity. This is particularly problematic as coca production encroaches more deeply into more remote areas of tropical rain forest. Transportation of disease, including the chitrid fungus, to these remote regions via human intrusion may also adversely affect amphibian populations. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of coca production, through habitat destruction, application of agrochemicals, and potential transmission of disease, are judged to pose greater risks to amphibian populations in coca-growing regions than the glyphosate spray control program.


Subject(s)
Coca/growth & development , Defoliants, Chemical/toxicity , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Ranidae , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Agriculture , Aircraft , Animals , Colombia , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Ecosystem , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Glycine/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Toxicity Tests , Glyphosate
10.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 72(15-16): 961-5, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672764

ABSTRACT

The spraying of coca (Erythroxylum coca) with glyphosate in Colombia has raised concerns about possible impacts on amphibians. There are few toxicity data for species other than those from temperate regions, and these have not been generated with the combination of formulated glyphosate (Glyphos) and the adjuvant, Cosmo-Flux (coca mix) as used in coca control in Colombia. In order to characterize toxicity of the spray mixture to frogs from Colombia, Gosner stage-25 tadpoles of Scinax ruber, Dendropophus microcephalus, Hypsiboas crepitans, Rhinella granulosa, Rhinella marina, Rhinella typhonius, Centrolene prosoblepon, and Engystomops pustulosus were exposed to the coca mix at concentrations of glyphosate ranging from 1 to 4.2 mg a.e./L diluted in dechlorinated tap water in glass containers. Cosmo-Flux was added to Glyphos in the proportion of 2.3% v/v, as used in aerial application for coca control. Exposures were for 96 h at 23 +/- 1.5 degrees C with 12:12-h light/dark cycle. Test solutions were renewed every 24 h. Concentrations, measured within the first hour and at 24 and 96 h using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Abraxis, LLC), ranged from 70 to 130% of nominal values. LC50 values ranged from 1200 to 2780 microg glyphosate acid equivalents (a.e.)/L for the 8 species tested. Data suggest that sensitivity to Roundup-type formulations of glyphosate in these species is similar to that observed in other tropical and temperate species. In addition, sensitivity of larval amphibians to Roundup-type formulations spans a relatively narrow range. Finally, toxicity of the mixture as used to spray coca was likely driven by the surfactant in the glyphosate formulation, as the addition of Cosmo-Flux did not enhance toxicity above those reported for Vision = Roundup.


Subject(s)
Anura/physiology , Defoliants, Chemical/toxicity , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Aircraft , Animals , Drug Combinations , Glycine/toxicity , Larva/drug effects , Larva/physiology , Lethal Dose 50 , Species Specificity , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Glyphosate
11.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 72(15-16): 966-73, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672765

ABSTRACT

The spraying of coca (Erythroxylum coca) with glyphosate (coca mixture, a combination of formulated glyphosate, Glyphos, and an adjuvant, Cosmo-Flux) in Colombia has raised concerns about possible impacts on amphibians. Although acute LC50 for 8 species of Colombian frogs ranged from 1.2 to 2.78 mg acid equivalents (a.e.)/L, these exposures were conducted in the laboratory in the absence of sediments and organic matter such as would occur under realistic field conditions. In order to assess the effects of overspray of frog habitat under field conditions, Gosner stage 25 tadpoles of Rhinella granulosa, R. marina, Hypsiboas crepitans, and Scinax ruber were placed in outdoor microcosms made from polyethylene plastic fish ponds (2.07 m in diameter, 37 cm high) in an experimental area in Tolima, Colombia. The bottoms of the microcosms were covered with a 3-cm layer of local soil and they were filled to a depth of 15 cm (above the sediment) with local spring water. After up to 100 tadpoles of each frog species were placed in the microcosms, they were sprayed with the coca mixture at concentrations greater and less than the normal application rate (3.69 kg glyphosate a.e./ha). Mortality at 96 h in the control microcosms was between 0 and 16% and LC50 values were between 8.9 and 10.9 kg glyphosate a.e./ha (equivalent to initial concentrations of 5963 to 7303 microg glyphosate a.e./L). Mortality >LC50 was only observed in the tested species when the application rate was >2-fold the normal application rate. In other experiments, juvenile and adult terrestrial stages of frogs were exposed by direct spraying to a range of concentrations of coca mixture. Juveniles and adults were exposed in plastic food containers (19 x 19 cm). The bottom of the container was filled with moistened soil and leaf litter to a depth of 1 cm and 0.5 cm, respectively. Mortality in the controls was low, from 0 to 10%, and from 0 to 35% at the normal application rate. LC50 values ranged between 4.5 kg a.e./ha and 22.8 kg a.e./ha, 1.5- to 6-fold greater than the normal application rate. Data indicate that, under realistic worst-case exposure conditions, the mixture of Glyphos and Cosmo-Flux as used for control of coca in Colombia exerts a low toxicity to aquatic and terrestrial stages of anurans and that risks to these organisms under field conditions are small.


Subject(s)
Anura/physiology , Defoliants, Chemical/toxicity , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/analysis , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Aircraft , Animals , Defoliants, Chemical/analysis , Drug Combinations , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Glycine/analysis , Glycine/toxicity , Larva/drug effects , Larva/physiology , Lethal Dose 50 , Models, Biological , Motor Activity/drug effects , Motor Activity/physiology , Risk Assessment , Species Specificity , Surface-Active Agents/analysis , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Toxicity Tests, Acute , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Glyphosate
12.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 72(15-16): 974-85, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19672766

ABSTRACT

The Colombian amphibian fauna is among the richest known in the world, with about 20 species of salamanders (order Caudata), 35 of the limbless caecilians (order Gymnophiona), and more than 700 species of frogs and toads (order Anura) recorded from localities within the country. The potential effects of exposure to glyphosate on amphibians arising from production of illegal crops (coca) were examined. The analysis was based on (1) behavior and ecology of species and (2) proximities of actual museum records to localities in which illegal crops are being grown and the subset of those that have been sprayed with glyphosate. Based on data on the location of amphibians collected in Colombia, records were obtained for 193 species (28% of the national diversity) of frogs and toads found in localities within 10 km of areas where coca is grown. Further analyses with ARC MAP software allowed for measurement of the direct distance separating collection locations for frogs, known coca fields, and areas where aerial spraying was being conducted. Records in or near coca fields included data for 11 of 13 families of frogs and toads known to be present in Colombia. Only Ceratophryidae and Pipidae were not reported from these locations and appear not to be at risk. For eight species (Dendrobates truncatus, Craugastor raniformis, Pristimantis gaigeae, Smilisca phaeota, Elachistocleis ovale, Hypsiboas crepitans, Trachycephalus venulosus, and Pseudis paradoxa) selected to represent several habitat preferences and life-cycle strategies, large areas of their distributions lie outside coca production regions and their populations as a whole are at low risk. For a limited number of species that barely enter Colombian territory, the consequences of coca production may be more serious and may have placed several species of frogs at risk. These include Ameerega bilingua, Dendropsophus bifurcus, Pristimantis colomai, P. degener, P. diadematus, P. quaquaversus, P. variabilis, and Trachycephalus jordani. Other species may also be at risk but exact numbers are unknown since few investigations were undertaken in these areas during the past 30 yr. The main ranges for these species were assumed to be in Ecuador.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Anura/physiology , Defoliants, Chemical/toxicity , Drug and Narcotic Control/methods , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/analysis , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Aircraft , Animals , Colombia , Defoliants, Chemical/analysis , Drug Combinations , Ecosystem , Environmental Monitoring , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Glycine/analysis , Glycine/toxicity , Life Cycle Stages/drug effects , Life Cycle Stages/physiology , Risk Assessment , Surface-Active Agents/analysis , Surface-Active Agents/toxicity , Glyphosate
13.
Int J Toxicol ; 27 Suppl 1: 63-75, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18569163

ABSTRACT

Drometrizole is used in cosmetics as an ultraviolet (UV) light absorber and stabilizer. In an earlier safety assessment, the available data were found insufficient to support the safety of this ingredient, but new data have been provided and assessed. In voluntary industry reports to the Food and Drug Administration, this ingredient is reported to be used in noncoloring hair care products, and in an industry use concentration survey, uses in nail care products at 0.07% were reported. Drometrizole has absorbance maxima at 243, 298, and 340 nm. Drometrizole is used widely as a UV absorber and stabilizer in plastics, polyesters, celluloses, acrylates, dyes, rubber, synthetic and natural fibers, waxes, detergent solutions, and orthodontic adhesives. It is similarly used in agricultural products and insecticides. Drometrizole is approved as an indirect food additive for use as an antioxidant and/or stabilizer in polymers. Short-term studies using rats reported liver weight increases, increases in the activities of enzymes aminopyrine N-demethylase, and UDP glucuronosyl transferase, but no significant effects were noted in the activities of acid hydrolases or in hepatocyte organelles. Although Drometrizole is insoluble in water and soluble in a wide range of organic solvents, a distribution and elimination study using rats indicated that some Drometrizole was absorbed, then metabolized and excreted in the urine. Drometrizole and products containing Drometrizole were nontoxic in acute oral, inhalation, and dermal studies using animals. No increase in mortality or local and/or systemic toxicity were observed in a 13-week oral toxicity study using dogs; the no observed effect level (NOEL) was 31.75 mg/kg day(- 1) for males and 34.6 mg/kg day(-1) for females. In a 2-year feeding study using rats, a NOEL of 47 to 58 mg/kg day(- 1) was reported. Developmental studies of Drometrizole in rats and mice found no teratogenic effects and a NOEL of 1000 mg/kg day(- 1) was reported. Drometrizole was not genotoxic in Ames tests, a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, or somatic mutation assays observing interphase nuclei and chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamsters. There was no evidence of dominant lethal effects in studies using mice or rats. Drometrizole at a 1% concentration was minimally to moderately irritating to rabbit eyes, if followed by rinsing, but mildly to severely irritating in unrinsed eyes. A nail product containing 0.03% Drometrizole, however, was nonirritating to unrinsed rabbit eyes. A nail polish containing 1.0% Drometrizole was nonirritating to rabbit skin and Drometrizole was negative for sensitization in two Magnusson-Kligman maximization tests in guinea pigs. In clinical tests, Drometrizole at 1% was nonirritating in a single-insult patch test. No irritation or eczematous reactions were observed in 300 patients (with or without dermatosis) treated with daily applications of Drometrizole for 8 weeks. In a 3-year clinical therapeutic trial conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two UV absorbing preparations containing up to 5% Drometrizole, two hypersensitivity reactions were observed during 445 applications. Although there are case reports in which Drometrizole was considered the sensitizing agent, clinical tests of cosmetic products containing 0.03% to 1.0% Drometrizole produced no irritation, sensitization, photosensitization, or phototoxicity in a total of 436 subjects. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel assumes that Drometrizole is used in both noncoloring hair care and nail care products at low concentrations. The available safety test data do not suggest any adverse effects associated with exposure to Drometrizole. This toxicologic profile, coupled with the low concentration of use and the unlikely dermal penetration of a chemical that is insoluble in water, support the conclusion that Drometrizole can be safely used in cosmetics.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Antioxidants/toxicity , Cosmetics/toxicity , Triazoles/toxicity , Animals , Consensus , Consumer Product Safety , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests
14.
Int J Toxicol ; 27 Suppl 1: 1-43, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18569160

ABSTRACT

Alcohol Denat. is the generic term used by the cosmetics industry to describe denatured alcohol. Alcohol Denat. and various specially denatured (SD) alcohols are used as cosmetic ingredients in a wide variety of products. Many denaturants have been previously considered, on an individual basis, as cosmetic ingredients by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel, whereas others, including Brucine and Brucine Sulfate, Denatonium Benzoate, and Quassin, have not previously been evaluated. Quassin is a bitter alkaloid obtained from the wood of Quassia amara. Quassin has been used as an insect antifeedant and insecticide and several studies demonstrate its effectiveness. At oral doses up to 1000 mg/kg using rats, Quassin was not toxic in acute and short-term tests, but some reversible piloerection, decrease in motor activity, and a partial loss of righting reflex were found in mice at 500 mg/kg. At 1000 mg/kg given intraperitoneally (i.p.), all mice died within 24 h of receiving treatment. In a cytotoxicity test with brine shrimp, 1 mg/ml of Quassin did not possess any cytotoxic or antiplasmodial activity. Quassin administered to rat Leydig cells in vitro at concentrations of 5-25 ng/ml inhibited both the basal and luteinizing hormone (LH)-stimulated testosterone secretion in a dose-related fashion. Quassin at doses up to 2.0 g/kg in drinking water using rats produced no significant effect on the body weights, but the mean weights of the testes, seminal vesicles, and epididymides were significantly reduced, and the weights of the anterior pituitary glands were significantly increased. The sperm counts and levels of LH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone were significantly lower in groups treated with Quassin. Brucine is a derivative of 2-hydroxystrychnine. Swiss-Webster mice given Brucine base, 30 ml/kg, had an acute oral LD(50) of 150 mg/kg, with central nervous system depression followed by convulsions and seizures in some cases. In those animals that died, respiratory arrest was the cause. The acute i.p. LD(50) for 15 ml/kg of Brucine base was 62.0 mg/kg, with central nervous system depression prior to the onset of convulsions, just as with oral Brucine. The acute intravenous (i.v.) LD(50) was 12.0 mg/kg. Brucine was nonmutagenic in an Ames assay at levels up to 6666 mu g/plate, with and without metabolic activation. In a repeat-insult patch test, for a hair care product containing 47% SD Alcohol 40 (95%), it was reported that Brucine Sulfate may be considered a nonprimary irritant and a nonprimary sensitizer. Three different sunscreen products (35% SD Alcohol 40-B, 72.4% SD Alcohol 40, and 74.5% SD Alcohol 40) did not show any signs of photoallergy in human subjects. Also, these three formulas did not exhibit any evidence of phototoxicity in humans. Denatonium Benzoate is a bitter substance detectable at a concentration of 10 ppb, discernibly bitter at 50 ppb, and unpleasantly bitter at 10 ppm. The distribution of topically applied lidocaine, a topical anesthetic chemically related to Denatonium Benzoate demonstrated that virtually no lidocaine appears in the plasma, suggesting that the larger Denatonium Benzoate molecule also would have little or no systemic exposure. Denatonium Benzoate (0.1%) did not show adverse effects in 10 rats in an acute inhalation toxicity test and 0.005% to 0.05% was nonirritating to ocular mucosa in 6 albino rabbits. The acute oral LD(50) for the male rats was 640 mg/kg and for females, 584 mg/kg. The LD(50) for the male rabbits was 508 mg/kg and for the female rabbits, 640 mg/kg. In two chronic toxicity studies, Denatonium Benzoate was administered (by gavage) at 1.6, 8, and 16 mg/kg/day, one using cynomologus monkeys and the other rats, resulted in no compound-related toxicity. The toxicity of SD Alcohols has also been tested, with implications for the particular denaturant used. An irritation test of 55.65% SD Alcohol 40-B denatured with Denatonium Benzoate using rabbits produced minimal effects. A spray formula containing 12% SD Alcohol 40-B was found to be nonirritating when evaluated for vaginal mucosal irritation in New Zealand white rabbits. Cosmetic formulations containing SD Alcohol 40-B (denatured with Denatonium Benzoate) were not sensitizers in repeated insult patch tests. A gel formula containing 29% SD Alcohol 40-B and a spray liquid containing 12% SD Alcohol 40-B did not induce photoallergy, dermal sensitization, or phototoxic response in human subjects. Although the absorption of ethanol (aka Alcohol for purposes of cosmetic ingredient labeling) occurs through skin, ethanol does not appear to affect the integrity of the skin barrier nor reach a very high systemic concentration following dermal exposure. Ethanol may be found in the bloodstream as a result of inhalation exposure and ingestion. Topically applied, ethanol can act as a penetration enhancer. Most of the systemic toxicity of ethanol appears to be associated with chronic abuse of alcohol. Although ethanol is denatured to make it unfit for consumption, there have been reports of intentional and unintentional consumption of products containing denatured alcohol. Ethanol is a reproductive and developmental toxicant. Ethanol is genotoxic in some test systems and it has been proposed that the genotoxic effects of ethanol are mediated via its metabolite, acetaldehyde. A brief summary is provided of the effects of chronic ingestion of alcohol including intoxication, liver damage, brain damage, and possible carcinogenicity. The CIR Expert Panel recognizes that certain ingredients in this group are reportedly used in a given product category, but the concentration of use is not available. Because dermal application or inhalation of cosmetic products containing these ingredients will not produce significant systemic exposure to ethanol, the CIR Expert Panel concluded that safety of the ingredients should be predicated on the safety of the denaturants used. The Panel considered that the adverse effects known to be associated with Alcohol ingestion included in this safety assessment do not suggest a concern for Alcohol Denat. or SD Alcohols because of the presence of the denaturants, which are added for the express purpose of making the Alcohol unpotable. The CIR Expert Panel has previously conducted safety assessments of t-Butyl Alcohol, Diethyl Phthalate, Methyl Alcohol, Salicylic Acid, Sodium Salicylate, and Methyl Salicylate, in which each was affirmed safe or safe with qualifications. Given their use as denaturants are at low concentrations of use in Alcohol, the CIR Expert Panel determined that Alcohol Denat. denatured with t-Butyl Alcohol, Diethyl Phthalate, Methyl Alcohol, Salicylic Acid, Sodium Salicylate, and Methyl Salicylate is safe as used in cosmetic formulations with no qualifications. Likewise, because they are denatured with either t-Butyl Alcohol, Diethyl Phthalate, or Methyl Alcohol, SD Alcohols 3-A, 30, 39-B, 39-C, and 40-C all are considered safe as used. The Panel considered the available data for Denatonium Benzoate and SD Alcohol 40-B to be sufficient to support the safety of these ingredients in cosmetics. Denatonium Benzoate is sufficiently bitter that it is an effective denaturant at only 0.0006%. The Panel recognized that data on dermal penetration of Denatonium Benzoate were not available, but considered that the available data on lidocaine, a smaller structurally related chemical, indicates that dermal exposure does not result in measurable systemic exposure. The available data, however, were not sufficient to support the safety of Quassin, Brucine, and Brucine Sulfate, Alcohol Denat. denatured with those denaturants, or SD Alcohol 39 and SD Alcohol 40 (SD Alcohols denatured with Quassin, Brucine, and/or Brucine Sulfate), and in order for the Expert Panel to reach a conclusion for these denaturants, additional data are needed.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Alcohols/toxicity , Cosmetics/toxicity , Quassins/toxicity , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/toxicity , Strychnine/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Risk Assessment , Strychnine/toxicity , Toxicity Tests
15.
Life Sci ; 212: 159-167, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30290186

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We investigate the consequence of adjuvant anastrozole (ANA) in monotherapy or associated with biochanin A (BCA) in ovariectomized (OVX) rat model and the degree of developing bone loss in both conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female rats were assigned to six groups. Five groups were bilaterally OVX, and one was sham operated. The five groups were; ANA group (0.5 mg/kg b.wt orally), BCA (5 mg/kg b.wt intraperitoneally (I/P), co-treated group (BCA + ANA), two control groups receiving even distilled water orally or DMSO I/P for twenty weeks. Bone turnover biomarkers BALP, OC, PTH, TRAP and TNFα were determined in serum. Bone mineral content, histological and morphometric measurements on rat femurs were performed. BMD by X-ray technique on tibias of rats and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of all treated and sham groups were applied. KEY FINDINGS: There was marked elevation in bone turnover biomarkers with high serum Ca and P content in the ANA-treated rats. Moreover marked elevation of TNFα, PTH, TC and TG, ANA caused severe changes in the BMD detected by X-ray in tibial bones and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of OVX rats. While I/P injection of BCA ameliorated the adverse bone health decrements caused by ANA. SIGNIFICANCE: The study highlights the importance of the BCA supplementation in accordance with the ANA therapy in case of ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis which is clinically presented in Postmenopausal women with breast cancer during which considerable risk of developing osteoporosis is predicted during treatment.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Anastrozole/toxicity , Genistein/pharmacology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Ovariectomy/adverse effects , Phytoestrogens/pharmacology , Animals , Female , Osteoporosis/etiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
16.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 21(4): 595-603, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17267167

ABSTRACT

Various formulations of agricultural chemicals, including solutions, wettable powders, and emulsifiable concentrates, contain adjuvants of solvents and surfactants in addition to active ingredients. Among these formulations, herbicides are among the most commonly used pesticides globally. Some pesticides have been demonstrated to cause severe circulatory failure in poisoned humans. To clarify the potential risk of herbicides and their adjuvants influence on the cardiovascular system, four technical grade (TG) herbicides and their end products (EP), including paraquat, glyphosate, glufosinate, and atrazine, as well as their formulated adjuvants isopropylamine (IPA), polyoxyethylene alkylether sulfate (AES), ethyl acetate (EA), xylene, petrolium-170 (P-170), and solvesso-100 (S-100), were assessed to determine their effects on isolated rat aorta and heart. The results revealed that the vasorelaxation effects of the herbicide EPs exceeded those of TGs, and atrazine produced more significant vasorelaxation in rat aortas than the other herbicides tested. The formulated adjuvants of IPA did not affect the aorta; however, AES, EA, xylene, P-170 and S-100 caused significant vasorelaxation. Herbicide EPs-induced vasorelaxation was generally endothelium-dependent. Furthermore, the TG and EP of paraquat, and the TG of glufosinate and glyphosate were found to have no effect on the isolated heart. However, the normal twitch tensions of the isolated heart were significantly inhibited by EPs of glyphosate and glufosinate, and by TG and EP of atrazine. Although, the adjuvants of IPA appeared unaffected, however, AES, EA, xylene, P-170 and S-100 caused complete inhibition and contraction on the isolated hearts. These results indicated that the adjuvants of herbicides might enhance hypotension and contributed to cardiovascular disorders during intoxication.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Blood Vessels/drug effects , Blood Vessels/pathology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Heart/drug effects , Herbicides/toxicity , Myocardium/pathology , Animals , Aorta, Thoracic/pathology , Cardiovascular System/pathology , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle Relaxation/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth, Vascular/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Solvents/toxicity
17.
Physiol Behav ; 173: 132-143, 2017 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28185878

ABSTRACT

Depression is frequently encountered during Parkinson's disease (PD) as a non-motor feature, which has been reported to cause and exaggerate motor deficits and neurodegenerative events in experimental PD models. We studied the effect of chronic mild stress (CMS) (pre, post and pre & post) exposure mediated depression on motor and non-motor symptoms, oxidative stress, inflammation and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and its related signalling molecules against the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine/probenecid (MPTP/p) induced neurotoxicity in mice. CMS and MPTP/p-coexposed C57BL/6 mice exhibited low neuromuscular strength and stride length with enhanced oxidative stress and inflammation as compared to CMS or MPTP/p alone exposed mice. Coexposure diminished the levels of BDNF and expressions of p-TrkB, p-ERK/ERK, p-AKT/AKT and p-CREB in nigrostriatal regions as compared to those of the alone exposure. CMS alone exposed mice showed more anxiety related behaviour with diminished expression of serotonin transporter as compared to MPTP/p alone injected group. Post-stress exposure to MPTP/p mice exhibited lowest motor and reflecting higher anxiety state with greatest enhancement in inflammation and reduction in the protein expression of stress and cell signalling markers as compared to pre and pre & post stress exposed PD mice. However, pre- and pre & post CMS exposed PD animals are more vulnerable to oxidative stress as compared with post-stress experienced MPTP/p mice. CMS mediated depression exacerbates motor/non-motor symptoms in MPTP/p-PD animals by modulating oxidative stress and various signalling molecules. Our results suggested that stress induced NMS can accelerate neurodegenerative processes in the PD in a progressive or expedited manner.


Subject(s)
1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine/adverse effects , Parkinsonian Disorders/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Animals , Body Weight/drug effects , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Calcium-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Catalase/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Exploratory Behavior/drug effects , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/metabolism , Male , Maze Learning/drug effects , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Muscle Strength/drug effects , Probenecid/toxicity , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Superoxide Dismutase/metabolism , Thiobarbiturates/toxicity , Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances/metabolism
19.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi ; 30(11): 821-4, 2005 Jun.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16110860

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nasal epithelium toxicity of adjuvants and rHV2 nasal spary(HVS). METHOD: Ciliary movement were evaluated with in situ toad palate model; The histology assessment of nasal epithelium were carried out after long-lasting and repeated use of HVS. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: Adjuvants included SDS, Brij 35, azone, lecithin, EDTA, menthol, nipagin and thiomersal were able to significantly inhibited the ciliary movement, while tween80, glycyrrhizic acid monoammonium salt, benzalkonium bromide, sodium benzoate and adhensive materials investigated had less influence on it. HVS was able to damaged the nasal epithelium, but this effect recovered soon after stopping administration. It was demonstrated that SDS, Brij 35, azone,lecithin, EDTA, menthol, nipagin and thiomersal. It had significant cilitoxity, while tween80, glycyrrhizic acid monoammonium salt, benzalkonium bromide, sodium benzoate and adhensive materials investigated had no significance; Chitosan co-administration with some adjuvants may make the cillitoxity severer; It is available that rHV2 be administered by nasal spary.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Hirudins/toxicity , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Bufo bufo , Chitosan/administration & dosage , Chitosan/toxicity , Cilia/drug effects , Epithelium/drug effects , Female , Hirudins/administration & dosage , Male , Palate/drug effects , Rabbits , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/toxicity
20.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 17(4): 497-504, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12849734

ABSTRACT

The influence on electrical resistance and membrane potential of rabbit corneas in vitro of some chemicals used as adjuvants in ophthalmic formulations was investigated, in the attempt to correlate changes in electrophysiological properties of the corneal tissue (possibly indicative of toxic/damaging effects to the corneal epithelium), with the promoting effect of the substances on transcorneal permeation in vitro of timolol maleate (TM). The chemicals, tested at different concentrations, were benzalkonium chloride (BAC), sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), polyoxyethylene-20-stearyl ether (PSE), polyethoxylated castor oil (PCO), deoxycholic acid sodium salt (DC) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). For these substances, definite correlations were found between promoting activity for permeation of TM and modification of electrophysiological parameters. These parameters were in all cases significantly altered by all agents at all concentrations after a 5-h contact. However, after a 1-h contact, 0.001% PSE and CPC did not significantly modify the corneal resistance, while PCO and PSE did not significantly modify the transcorneal potential at the tested concentrations. Only 0.001% PSE, a nonionic surfactant used as solubilizer and emulsifier, active as promoter for TM, did not modify both electrophysiological parameters to a significant extent after 1 h. The results of this study indicate correlations between ocular toxicity, promoting activity for transcorneal permeation of timolol and modification of the electrophysiological parameters.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/toxicity , Cornea/metabolism , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Bile Acids and Salts/pharmacokinetics , Chelating Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cornea/drug effects , Edetic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Electric Impedance , Electrophysiology , Eye Diseases/physiopathology , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Membrane Potentials/drug effects , Permeability/drug effects , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Rabbits , Surface-Active Agents/pharmacokinetics , Timolol/pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL