Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 140
Filter
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(3): 774-782, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The implementation of integrated vascular surgery training programs was recently shown to be associated with an increase in women entering the field. However, whether this has precipitated a subsequent increase in the active participation of women in academic vascular societies remains unclear. We sought to examine the trends of academic inclusion of women vascular surgeons and surgical trainees over the past 15 years at the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery (SAVS). METHODS: Scientific programs for annual meetings of the SAVS, and program matriculation statistics from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, were reviewed for the period of 2006 to 2020. Yearly rates and 3-year averages of conference and society participation and vascular surgery training program matriculation rates were calculated and compared with proportion testing. Spearman correlation testing was used to compare trends, with ρ ≥0.600 defined as a strong correlation. RESULTS: Examining 3-year means, the average number of women authors per SAVS abstract increased from 0.78 to 1.42 over the course of the study period (P < .001), and the overall rate of women authors steadily increased from 12.8% to 21.5% (P < .001). Although this remains less than the proportion of women matriculating into vascular surgery programs in 2019 (29.3%; P = .007), the upward trend of women entering vascular surgery overall, and particularly vascular surgery fellowship, strongly correlates with the average number of women authors on abstracts at SAVS (ρ = 0.709 and ρ = 0.737, respectively). The percentage of women presenting authors increased from 9.7% to 28.4% (P = .004), but there was no increase in the percentage of women senior authors (10.1% to 9.6%; P = .92). In the 15-year period, only one abstract of 347 (0.3%) had full authorship by women vs 35.1% with full authorship by men (P < .001). Although the increase of women matriculating into vascular surgery programs over the study period did not correlate with the increase of women in senior leadership positions (ρ < 0.600), there was an increase in the number of women in committee chair positions (0.0% to 25.9%; P = .005), which correlated strongly with increasing society membership (ρ = 0.716). Additionally, there was an increase in women holding executive council positions from 0% to 10.0% (P = .08), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Participation of women authoring and presenting papers at the SAVS has increased over the past 15 years at a rate that strongly correlates with the increasing rate of women entering vascular surgery training programs. It is important that society leadership opportunities continue to parallel this trend as we seek to further improve diversity in vascular surgery.


Subject(s)
Gender Equity/trends , Leadership , Physicians, Women/trends , Societies, Medical/trends , Surgeons/trends , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Women, Working , Advisory Committees/trends , Authorship , Committee Membership , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sexism/trends , Speech , Time Factors
4.
JAMA ; 328(17): 1747-1765, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318128

ABSTRACT

Importance: It is uncertain whether hormone therapy should be used for the primary prevention of chronic conditions such as heart disease, osteoporosis, or some types of cancers. Objective: To update evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force on the benefits and harms of hormone therapy in reducing risks for chronic conditions. Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and trial registries from January 1, 2016, through October 12, 2021; surveillance through July 2022. Study Selection: English-language randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies of fair or good quality. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality; meta-analyses when at least 3 similar studies were available. Main Outcomes and Measures: Morbidity and mortality related to chronic conditions; health-related quality of life. Results: Twenty trials (N = 39 145) and 3 cohort studies (N = 1 155 410) were included. Participants using estrogen only compared with placebo had significantly lower risks for diabetes over 7.1 years (1050 vs 903 cases; 134 fewer [95% CI, 18-237]) and fractures over 7.2 years (1024 vs 1413 cases; 388 fewer [95% CI, 277-489]) per 10 000 persons. Risks per 10 000 persons were statistically significantly increased for gallbladder disease over 7.1 years (1113 vs 737 cases; 377 more [95% CI, 234-540]), stroke over 7.2 years (318 vs 239 cases; 79 more [95% CI, 15-159]), venous thromboembolism over 7.2 years (258 vs 181 cases; 77 more [95% CI, 19-153]), and urinary incontinence over 1 year (2331 vs 1446 cases; 885 more [95% CI, 659-1135]). Participants using estrogen plus progestin compared with placebo experienced significantly lower risks, per 10 000 persons, for colorectal cancer over 5.6 years (59 vs 93 cases; 34 fewer [95% CI, 9-51]), diabetes over 5.6 years (403 vs 482 cases; 78 fewer [95% CI, 15-133]), and fractures over 5 years (864 vs 1094 cases; 230 fewer [95% CI, 66-372]). Risks, per 10 000 persons, were significantly increased for invasive breast cancer (242 vs 191 cases; 51 more [95% CI, 6-106]), gallbladder disease (723 vs 463 cases; 260 more [95% CI, 169-364]), stroke (187 vs 135 cases; 52 more [95% CI, 12-104]), and venous thromboembolism (246 vs 126 cases; 120 more [95% CI, 68-185]) over 5.6 years; probable dementia (179 vs 91 cases; 88 more [95% CI, 15-212]) over 4.0 years; and urinary incontinence (1707 vs 1145 cases; 562 more [95% CI, 412-726]) over 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of hormone therapy in postmenopausal persons for the primary prevention of chronic conditions was associated with some benefits but also with an increased risk of harms.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Estrogens , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Postmenopause , Progestins , Female , Humans , Advisory Committees/standards , Advisory Committees/trends , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/mortality , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Estrogens/adverse effects , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Hormone Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Hormone Replacement Therapy/methods , Hormones/adverse effects , Hormones/therapeutic use , Primary Prevention , Progestins/adverse effects , Progestins/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk Assessment , United States , Urinary Incontinence/chemically induced , Venous Thromboembolism/chemically induced
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(1): 142-148, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002530

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, technological advancements, regulatory waivers, and user acceptance have converged to boost telehealth activities. Due to the state of emergency, regulatory waivers in the United States have made it possible for providers to deliver and bill for services across state lines for new and established patients through Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)- and non-HIPAA-compliant platforms with home as the originating site and without geographic restrictions. Platforms have been developed or purchased to perform videoconferencing, and interdisciplinary dialysis teams have adapted to perform virtual visits. Telehealth experiences and challenges encountered by dialysis providers, clinicians, nurses, and patients have exposed health care disparities in areas such as access to care, bandwidth connectivity, availability of devices to perform telehealth, and socioeconomic and language barriers. Future directions in telehealth use, quality measures, and research in telehealth use need to be explored. Telehealth during the public health emergency has changed the practice of health care, with the post-COVID-19 world unlikely to resemble the prior era. The future impact of telehealth in patient care in the United States remains to be seen, especially in the context of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/standards , Hemodialysis, Home/standards , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Nephrology/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Telemedicine/standards , Advisory Committees/trends , Hemodialysis, Home/trends , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Nephrology/trends , Societies, Medical/trends , Telemedicine/trends , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(2S): 15S-20S, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34303453

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Medical schools and surgical residencies have seen an increase in the proportion of female matriculants, with 30% of current vascular surgery trainees being women over the past decade. There is widespread focus on increasing diversity in medicine and surgery in an effort to provide optimal quality of patient care and the advancement of science. The presence of gender diversity and opportunities to identify with women in leadership positions positively correlates with women choosing to enter traditionally male-dominated fields. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the representation of women in regional and national vascular surgical societies over the last 20 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of the meeting programs of vascular surgery societies was performed. Data were collected on abstract presenters, moderators, committee members and chairs, and officers (president, president-elect, vice president, secretary, and treasurer). The data were divided into early (1999-2009) and late (2010-2019) time periods. RESULTS: Five regional and five national societies' data were analyzed, including 139 meetings. The mean percentage of female abstract presenters increased significantly from 10.9% in the early period to 20.6% in the late period (P < .001). Female senior authors increased slightly from 8.7% to 11.5%, but this change was not statistically significant (P = .22). Female meeting moderators increased significantly from 7.8% to 17.2% (P < .001), as well as female committee members increased from 10.9% to 20.3% (P = .003). Female committee chairs increased slightly from 10.9% to 16.9%, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .13). Female society officers increased considerably from 6.4% to 14.8%. (P = .002). Significant variation was noted between societies, with five societies (three regional and two national) having less than 10% women at the officer level in 2019. There was a wide variation noted between societies in the percentage of female abstract presenters (range, 7.6%-34.9%), senior authors (3.9%-17.9%), and meeting moderators (5.4%-40.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in the representation of women in vascular surgery societies among those presenting scientific work, serving as meeting moderators, and serving as committee members. However, the representation of women among committee chairs, senior authors, and society leadership has not kept up pace with the increase noted at other levels. Efforts to recruit women into the field of vascular surgery as well as to support the professional development of female vascular surgeons are facilitated by the presence of women in leadership roles. Increasing the representation of women in vascular society leadership positions may be a key strategy in promoting gender diversity in the vascular surgery field.


Subject(s)
Gender Equity , Physicians, Women/trends , Sexism/trends , Societies, Medical/trends , Surgeons/trends , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Advisory Committees/trends , Committee Membership , Congresses as Topic/trends , Female , Humans , Leadership , Male , Mentors , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Surgeons/education , Vascular Surgical Procedures/education
7.
Pediatr Res ; 90(2): 300-314, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33239709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of women in decision-making positions, such as on editorial committees of biomedical journals, is not the same as that of men. This paper analyzes the gender composition of editorial committees (EBMs) and editors-in-chief (ECs) positions of pediatric journals. METHODS: The gender of EBMs and ECs of 125 journals classified in the pediatrics area of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) was analyzed. The following indicators were calculated: gender distribution of ECs and EBMs by journal, publisher, subject speciality, country, quartile of the journal in JCR and country of affiliation of the members. RESULTS: The total number of EBMs was 4242. The distribution by sex of the ECs was 19.44% women and 80.56% men, while that of the EBMs were 33.05% women and 66.95% men. Twenty journals exhibited a greater representation of women than of men, and in four there was parity. Journals with greater participation of women specialized in nursing and physical therapy and were related to nutrition (lactation and breastfeeding). CONCLUSIONS: Only one-fifth of ECs and one-third of EBMs are females. Women's participation is higher in journals related to nursing, physical and occupational therapy, and nutrition. The United States has the highest number of EBMs, followed by the European Union. IMPACT: Only one-fifth of Editors-in-chief in pediatrics journals are female. Only one-third of Editorial Board Members in pediatrics journals are female. Women's participation is higher in editorials committees in pediatrics journals related to nursing, physical and occupational therapy, and nutrition. Medical and pediatric associations and societies must work together to eliminate the disparities that exist between women and men. Achieving gender equity and empowering all women is one of the World Health Organization's Sustainable Development Goals.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/trends , Biomedical Research/trends , Committee Membership , Editorial Policies , Gender Equity/trends , Pediatrics/trends , Periodicals as Topic/trends , Sexism/trends , Empowerment , Female , Gender Role , Humans , Male
8.
Neurosurg Focus ; 49(6): E8, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33260132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The recent COVID-19 outbreak has forced notable adjustments to surgical procedure preparation, including neurosurgical services. However, due to the uniqueness of the recent situation, neurosurgical centers, especially those located in low-resource settings, are facing several challenges such as a lack of coordination, poor equipment, and shortage of medical personnel. Therefore, several guidelines from local authorities and international neurosurgical bodies have been published to help clinicians manage their patients. In addition, the academic health system (AHS), which is an integrated system containing a medical institution, universities, and a teaching hospital, may play some role in the management of patients during COVID-19. The objective of this study was to describe how each hospital in the authors' network adjusted their neurosurgical practice and how the AHS of the Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) played its role in the adaptation process during the pandemic. METHODS: The authors gathered both local and national data about the number of COVID-19 infections from the government's database. To assess the contribution of the AHS to the efforts of each hospital to address the pandemic, questionnaires were given to 6 neurosurgeons, 1 resident, and 2 general surgeons about the management of neurosurgical cases during the pandemic in their hospitals. RESULTS: The data illustrate various strategies to manage neurosurgical cases by hospitals within the authors' networks. The hospitals were grouped into three categories based on the transmission risk in each region. Most of these hospitals stated that UGM AHS had a positive impact on the changes in their strategies. In the early phase of the outbreak, some hospitals faced a lack of coordination between hospitals and related stakeholders, inadequate amount of personal protective equipment (PPE), and unclear regulations. As the nation enters a new phase, almost all hospitals had performed routine screening tests, had a sufficient amount of PPE for the medical personnel, and followed both national and international guidelines in caring for their neurosurgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: The management of neurosurgical procedures during the outbreak has been a challenging task and a role of the AHS in improving patient care has been experienced by most hospitals in the authors' network. In the future, the authors expect to develop a better collaboration for the next possible pandemic.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/standards , Advisory Committees/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, General/standards , Neurosurgeons/standards , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , Academic Medical Centers/trends , Advisory Committees/trends , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Hospitals, General/trends , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Neurosurgeons/trends , Neurosurgical Procedures/trends , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Personal Protective Equipment/trends
9.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 101-108, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30807465

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: During January 2016 to June 2017, US health departments (HDs) reported 150 mumps outbreaks. Most occurred among populations with high 2-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, prompting the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to examine the evidence for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HD experiences with mumps outbreak control and use of a third MMR dose during outbreaks. DESIGN: An online survey assessing mumps outbreak characteristics, outbreak response measures, challenges, and lessons learned from previous outbreaks was distributed to all 81 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists member HDs in August 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-one (75%) HDs responded; 46 (75%) had experience with ≥1 mumps outbreak(s) during January 2016 to August 2017. Twenty (43%) HDs recommended a third or outbreak MMR dose during mumps outbreaks; of these, 19 completed the section on use of a third dose and 8 (40%) rated the intervention "somewhat effective" or better. Health departments that used a third/outbreak dose suggested implementing the recommendation early and to a targeted group. Forty-three (73%) HDs reported having a policy for excluding persons without presumptive immunity from outbreak settings; of these, 37 (86%) had some degree of legal authority to implement this policy. Exclusion compliance improved with the use of personalized notification letters, focus groups of excluded persons and the community, and standardized messaging. Other outbreak control measures included cohorting of exposed or susceptible persons, mobile vaccination clinics and home visits, contact monitoring via text messaging, and facilitating student isolation with meal delivery and excused class absences. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed heterogeneity across HDs' mumps outbreak responses but also identified common challenges that will inform future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance. These results were considered in the October 2017 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation for use of a third dose of MMR vaccine for persons at increased risk for mumps during an outbreak and in the development of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for HDs when applying the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/prevention & control , Public Health/methods , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/trends , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/therapeutic use , Mumps/drug therapy , Mumps/epidemiology , Public Health/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
10.
Value Health ; 22(3): 267-275, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30832964

ABSTRACT

Cost-effectiveness models that present results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year for health technologies are used to inform policy decisions in many parts of the world. Health state utilities (HSUs) are required to calculate the quality-adjusted life-years. Even when clinical studies assessing the effectiveness of health technologies collect data on HSUs to populate a cost-effectiveness model, which rarely happens, analysts typically need to identify at least some additional HSUs from alternative sources. When possible, HSUs are identified by a systematic review of the literature, but, again, this rarely happens. In 2014, ISPOR established a Good Practices for Outcome Research Task Force to address the use of HSUs in cost-effectiveness models. This task force report provides recommendations for researchers who identify, review, and synthesize HSUs for use in cost-effectiveness models; analysts who use the results in models; and reviewers who critically appraise the suitability and validity of the HSUs selected for use in models. The associated Minimum Reporting Standards of Systematic Review of Utilities for Cost-Effectiveness checklist created by the task force provides criteria to judge the appropriateness of the HSUs selected for use in cost-effectiveness models and is suitable for use in different international settings.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Research Report , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Advisory Committees/trends , Cost-Benefit Analysis/trends , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/trends , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Research Report/trends , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/trends
11.
Value Health ; 21(9): 1019-1028, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30224103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Constrained optimization methods are already widely used in health care to solve problems that represent traditional applications of operations research methods, such as choosing the optimal location for new facilities or making the most efficient use of operating room capacity. OBJECTIVES: In this paper we illustrate the potential utility of these methods for finding optimal solutions to problems in health care delivery and policy. To do so, we selected three award-winning papers in health care delivery or policy development, reflecting a range of optimization algorithms. Two of the three papers are reviewed using the ISPOR Constrained Optimization Good Practice Checklist, adapted from the framework presented in the initial Optimization Task Force Report. The first case study illustrates application of linear programming to determine the optimal mix of screening and vaccination strategies for the prevention of cervical cancer. The second case illustrates application of the Markov Decision Process to find the optimal strategy for treating type 2 diabetes patients for hypercholesterolemia using statins. The third paper (described in Appendix 1) is used as an educational tool. The goal is to describe the characteristics of a radiation therapy optimization problem and then invite the reader to formulate the mathematical model for solving it. This example is particularly interesting because it lends itself to a range of possible models, including linear, nonlinear, and mixed-integer programming formulations. From the case studies presented, we hope the reader will develop an appreciation for the wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods, as well as the variety of methods available. CONCLUSIONS: Constrained optimization methods are informative in providing insights to decision makers about optimal target solutions and the magnitude of the loss of benefit or increased costs associated with the ultimate clinical decision or policy choice. Failing to identify a mathematically superior or optimal solution represents a missed opportunity to improve economic efficiency in the delivery of care and clinical outcomes for patients. The ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force's first report provided an introduction to constrained optimization methods to solve important clinical and health policy problems. This report also outlined the relationship of constrained optimization methods relative to traditional health economic modeling, graphically illustrated a simple formulation, and identified some of the major variants of constrained optimization models, such as linear programming, dynamic programming, integer programming, and stochastic programming. The second report illustrates the application of constrained optimization methods in health care decision making using three case studies. The studies focus on determining optimal screening and vaccination strategies for cervical cancer, optimal statin start times for diabetes, and an educational case to invite the reader to formulate radiation therapy optimization problems. These illustrate a wide range of problem types that can be addressed with constrained optimization methods.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/trends , Decision Making , Health Systems Plans/trends , Models, Theoretical , Policy Making , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Female , Health Policy , Health Systems Plans/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Case Studies/methods , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
13.
Anesth Analg ; 126(5): 1624-1632, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29239957

ABSTRACT

A task force of pediatric surgical specialists with the support of The American College of Surgeons recently launched a verification program for pediatric surgery, the Children's Surgery Verification quality improvement program, with the goal of improving pediatric surgical, procedural, and perioperative care. Included in this program are specific standards for the delivery of pediatric anesthesia care across a variety of practice settings. We review the background, available evidence, requirements for verification, and verification process and its implications for the practice of pediatric anesthesia across the country. In addition, we have included a special roundtable interview of 3 recently Children's Surgery Verification-verified program directors to provide an up-to-date real-world perspective of this children's surgery quality improvement program.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/standards , Anesthesiologists/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Surgeons/standards , Advisory Committees/trends , Anesthesiologists/trends , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Quality Improvement/trends , Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends , Societies, Medical/trends , Surgeons/trends , United States/epidemiology
14.
Health Econ ; 26(3): 292-304, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26676999

ABSTRACT

We provide evidence for the causal impact of social status on longevity by exploiting a natural experiment in which subjects undergo a shift in their social status without considerable economic impact. We gather data on 4190 scientists who were either nominated for or successfully elected to the Chinese Academy of Science or of Engineering. Being elected as an academician in China is a boost in social status (vice-ministerial level) with negligible direct economic impact (US$30 monthly before 2009). After correcting for two sources of bias, (1) some potential academicians decease too young to be elected, leading to selection bias in favor of academicians and (2) the endogenous relationship between health and social status, we find that the enhanced social status of becoming an academician leads to approximately 1.2 years longer life. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/statistics & numerical data , Longevity , Social Class , Advisory Committees/trends , China , Developing Countries , Health Status , Humans , Middle Aged , Politics
15.
Rev Sci Tech ; 36(1): 105-114, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28926023

ABSTRACT

A brief history of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) and its control in Great Britain (GB) is presented. Numerous diverse policies to control the disease in humans, cattle and wildlife have been pursued over the last 100 years and many millions of pounds have been spent. After notable success in reducing the incidence and prevalence of bTB in cattle in GB from the 1950s to the mid-1980s, the geographical spread of the disease and the number of cattle slaughtered have increased continually since that time, with a high point of bTB incidence in 2008. This increase appeared to coincide with changing policy regarding the control of the disease in badgers, with a more humane approach adopted and with strengthened protection for badgers through legislation. Indeed, there has been much controversy in the debate on the role of badgers in disease transmission to cattle and the need for their control as vectors of the disease. The issue has attracted the attention of the media and there have been various commissioned research projects, trials and public consultations. The findings of two social science investigations presented as examples showed that citizens generally believed that bTB in cattle is an important issue that needs to be tackled, but objected to badgers being killed, whilst cattle farmers were willing to pay around £17/animal/year for a bTB cattle vaccine. It is noted that successes regarding the control of bTB in other countries have combined both cattle and wildlife controls and involved industry working in close partnership with government.


L'auteur retrace brièvement l'histoire de la tuberculose bovine et de la lutte contre cette maladie en Grande-Bretagne. Diverses mesures sanitaires ont été appliquées au cours des cent dernières années afin de maîtriser la maladie chez l'homme, chez les bovins et dans la faune sauvage, pour une dépense totale de plusieurs millions de livres. Après la chute remarquable de l'incidence et de la prévalence de la tuberculose bovine en Grande-Bretagne enregistrée depuis les années 50, la situation s'est inversée au milieu des années 80 et tant la distribution géographique de la maladie que le nombre de bovins abattus n'ont cessé de croître depuis cette date, l'année 2008 marquant le pic de l'incidence de la tuberculose bovine. Il est désormais établi que cette hausse a coïncidé avec l'évolution des politiques de lutte contre la tuberculose chez les blaireaux, à la faveur d'une approche plus respectueuse du bien-être animal qui s'est traduite par une protection renforcée des blaireaux dans la législation. En effet, le rôle des blaireaux dans la transmission de la tuberculose aux bovins et l'impératif de lutter contre les blaireaux en tant que vecteurs ont fait l'objet de très fortes controverses. Cette question a attiré l'attention des médias et il y a eu de nombreux projets de recherche commandités sur le sujet, d'expériences et de consultations publiques. D'après deux enquêtes sociologiques citées par l'auteur, les citoyens étaient généralement convaincus de l'importance de la tuberculose chez les bovins et de la nécessité de s'y attaquer mais ils s'opposaient aux mesures d'abattage des blaireaux, tandis que les éleveurs de bovins étaient disposés à payer environ 17 livres par bovin et par année pour pouvoir vacciner leurs bovins contre la tuberculose bovine. L'auteur fait observer que les succès enregistrés dans d'autres pays dans la lutte contre la tuberculose bovine sont liés à l'application combinée de mesures de contrôle chez les bovins et dans la faune sauvage et à une étroite collaboration entre les éleveurs et le gouvernement.


El autor repasa sucintamente la historia de la tuberculosis bovina y de su control en Gran Bretaña. En los últimos 100 años se han aplicado numerosas y variadas políticas y se han invertido muchos millones de libras para combatir la enfermedad en el ser humano, el ganado vacuno y la fauna silvestre. Entre mediados del decenio de 1950 y mediados del de 1980 se trabajó con notable éxito para reducir la incidencia y prevalencia de la enfermedad en el ganado vacuno británico. Pero a partir de ahí hubo una progresión constante en la propagación geográfica de la enfermedad y en el número de cabezas de ganado sacrificadas, con un máximo de incidencia registrado en 2008. Tal incremento parece coincidir con una inflexión de la política aplicada para luchar contra la enfermedad en los tejones, con la adopción de métodos más clementes y de medidas legislativas que instauraban un mayor nivel de protección de los tejones. Ha habido en efecto una gran controversia acerca del papel de los tejones en los procesos de transmisión de la enfermedad al ganado vacuno y la necesidad de controlar a esos animales como vectores de la infección. El tema ha suscitado gran atención mediática y ha sido objeto de una serie de proyectos de investigación, experimentos y consultas públicas. Según demuestran las conclusiones de dos investigaciones de ciencias sociales presentadas como ejemplo, en general los ciudadanos pensaban que la tuberculosis bovina en el ganado era un problema importante al que había que dar respuesta, pero se oponían al sacrificio de los tejones, a la vez que los ganaderos estaban dispuestos a pagar alrededor de 17 libras/animal/año por la vacunación antituberculosa de sus rebaños vacunos. El autor señala que los éxitos obtenidos en otros países a la hora de combatir la tuberculosis bovina pasan por instaurar controles a la vez en el ganado y en la fauna silvestre y por lograr que la industria trabaje en estrecha asociación con las instancias públicas.


Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Bovine/economics , Advisory Committees/history , Advisory Committees/trends , Animals , Cattle , Communications Media/trends , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Mustelidae , Public Opinion , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tuberculosis Vaccines/economics , Tuberculosis, Bovine/history , Tuberculosis, Bovine/prevention & control , United Kingdom
17.
J Nurs Adm ; 46(12): 621-622, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27851700

ABSTRACT

In the 2nd of a 3-part series on the value of patient and family advisory councils, an early adopter at a large, Magnet®-recognized healthcare system reveals ways in which an environment focused on strong partnerships, a culture of safety, and a commitment to transparency led to the creation of successful councils at multiple hospitals. The authors discuss nursing's integral role in championing and leading the councils, as well as the benefits of a strong patient-family voice in hospital operations and care processes.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration/standards , Nurse Administrators/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Patient Participation , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/standards , Advisory Committees/trends , Hospital Administration/trends , Humans , Nurse Administrators/organization & administration , Nurse Administrators/trends , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Organizational Case Studies , Professional-Family Relations
19.
Epilepsia ; 56(5): 674-81, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25779625

ABSTRACT

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Diagnostic Methods Commission charged the Neuropsychology Task Force with the job of developing a set of recommendations to address the following questions: (1) What is the role of a neuropsychological assessment? (2) Who should do a neuropsychological assessment? (3) When should people with epilepsy be referred for a neuropsychological assessment? and (4) What should be expected from a neuropsychological assessment? The recommendations have been broadly written for health care clinicians in established epilepsy settings as well as those setting up new services. They are based on a detailed survey of neuropsychological assessment practices across international epilepsy centers, and formal ranking of specific recommendations for advancing clinical epilepsy care generated by specialist epilepsy neuropsychologists from around the world. They also incorporate the latest research findings to establish minimum standards for training and practice, reflecting the many roles of neuropsychological assessment in the routine care of children and adults with epilepsy. The recommendations endorse routine screening of cognition, mood, and behavior in new-onset epilepsy, and describe the range of situations when more detailed, formal neuropsychological assessment is indicated. They identify a core set of cognitive and psychological domains that should be assessed to provide an objective account of an individual's cognitive, emotional, and psychosocial functioning, including factors likely contributing to deficits identified on qualitative and quantitative examination. The recommendations also endorse routine provision of feedback to patients, families, and clinicians about the implications of the assessment results, including specific clinical recommendations of what can be done to improve a patient's cognitive or psychosocial functioning and alleviate the distress of any difficulties identified. By canvassing the breadth and depth of scope of neuropsychological assessment, this report demonstrates the pivotal role played by this noninvasive and minimally resource intensive investigation in the care of people with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Epilepsy , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Neuropsychology , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/standards , Advisory Committees/trends , Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsy/psychology , Epilepsy/therapy , Humans , International Cooperation , Neuropsychological Tests , Reproducibility of Results
20.
Value Health ; 18(2): 147-60, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25773550

ABSTRACT

In a previous report, the ISPOR Task Force on Dynamic Simulation Modeling Applications in Health Care Delivery Research Emerging Good Practices introduced the fundamentals of dynamic simulation modeling and identified the types of health care delivery problems for which dynamic simulation modeling can be used more effectively than other modeling methods. The hierarchical relationship between the health care delivery system, providers, patients, and other stakeholders exhibits a level of complexity that ought to be captured using dynamic simulation modeling methods. As a tool to help researchers decide whether dynamic simulation modeling is an appropriate method for modeling the effects of an intervention on a health care system, we presented the System, Interactions, Multilevel, Understanding, Loops, Agents, Time, Emergence (SIMULATE) checklist consisting of eight elements. This report builds on the previous work, systematically comparing each of the three most commonly used dynamic simulation modeling methods-system dynamics, discrete-event simulation, and agent-based modeling. We review criteria for selecting the most suitable method depending on 1) the purpose-type of problem and research questions being investigated, 2) the object-scope of the model, and 3) the method to model the object to achieve the purpose. Finally, we provide guidance for emerging good practices for dynamic simulation modeling in the health sector, covering all aspects, from the engagement of decision makers in the model design through model maintenance and upkeep. We conclude by providing some recommendations about the application of these methods to add value to informed decision making, with an emphasis on stakeholder engagement, starting with the problem definition. Finally, we identify areas in which further methodological development will likely occur given the growing "volume, velocity and variety" and availability of "big data" to provide empirical evidence and techniques such as machine learning for parameter estimation in dynamic simulation models. Upon reviewing this report in addition to using the SIMULATE checklist, the readers should be able to identify whether dynamic simulation modeling methods are appropriate to address the problem at hand and to recognize the differences of these methods from those of other, more traditional modeling approaches such as Markov models and decision trees. This report provides an overview of these modeling methods and examples of health care system problems in which such methods have been useful. The primary aim of the report was to aid decisions as to whether these simulation methods are appropriate to address specific health systems problems. The report directs readers to other resources for further education on these individual modeling methods for system interventions in the emerging field of health care delivery science and implementation.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Services Research/methods , Models, Theoretical , Advisory Committees/trends , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Health Policy/trends , Health Services Research/trends , Humans , Research Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL