Role of visceral fat on postoperative complications and relapse in patients with Crohn's disease after ileocecal resection: Is it overrated?

INTRODUCTION: The role of visceral fat in disease development, particularly in Crohn´s disease (CD), is significant. However, its preoperative prognostic value for postoperative complications and CD relapse after ileocecal resection (ICR) remains unknown. This study aims to assess the predictive potential of preoperatively measured visceral and subcutaneous fat in postoperative complications and CD recurrence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was postoperative anastomotic leakage of the ileocolonic anastomosis, with secondary endpoints evaluating postoperative complications according to the Clavien Dindo classification and CD recurrence at the anastomosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 347 CD patients who underwent ICR at our tertiary referral center between 2010 and 2020. We included 223 patients with high-quality preoperative MRI scans, recording demographics, postoperative outcomes, and CD recurrence rates at the anastomosis. To assess adipose tissue distribution, we measured total fat area (TFA), visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and abdominal circumference (AC) at the lumbar 3 (L3) level using MRI cross-sectional images. Ratios of these values were calculated. RESULTS: None of the radiological variables showed an association with anastomotic leakage (TFA p = 0.932, VFA p = 0.982, SFA p = 0.951, SFA/TFA p = 0.422, VFA/TFA p = 0.422), postoperative complications, or CD recurrence (TFA p = 0.264, VFA p = 0.916, SFA p = 0.103, SFA/TFA p = 0.059, VFA/TFA p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: Radiological visceral obesity variables were associated with postoperative outcomes or clinical recurrence in CD patients undergoing ICR. Preoperative measurement of visceral fat measurement is not specific for predicting postoperative complications or CD relapse.

Rates of Anastomotic Complications and Their Management Following Esophagectomy: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize rates and management of anastomotic leak (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) after esophagectomy in an international cohort. BACKGROUND: Outcomes in patients with anastomotic complications of esophagectomy are currently uncertain. Optimum strategies to manage AL/CN are unknown, and have not been assessed in an international cohort. METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2018 and December 2018 (with 90 days of follow-up). The primary outcomes were AL and CN, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. The secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and successful AL/CN management, defined as patients being alive at 90 day postoperatively, and requiring no further AL/CN treatment. RESULTS: This study included 2247 esophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. The AL rate was 14.2% (n = 319) and CN rate was 2.7% (n = 60). The overall 90-day mortality rate for patients with AL was 11.3%, and increased significantly with severity of AL (Type 1: 3.2% vs. Type 2: 13.2% vs. Type 3: 24.7%, P < 0.001); a similar trend was observed for CN. Of the 329 patients with AL/CN, primary management was successful in 69.6% of cases. Subsequent rounds of management lead to an increase in the rate of successful treatment, with cumulative success rates of 85.4% and 88.1% after secondary and tertiary management, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient outcomes worsen significantly with increasing AL and CN severity. Reintervention after failed primary anastomotic complication management can be successful, hence surgeons should not be deterred from trying alternative management strategies.

Use of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa Stent in the Prevention of Anastomotic Leaks in the Porcine Colon.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal anastomoses are performed millions of times per year worldwide. The major complication they share is anastomotic leak. We describe the development and initial safety/efficacy of a novel luminal stent which aims to address this clinical issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stent was created out of two materials, a polyvinyl alcohol core and outer layer of acellular porcine small intestine submucosa. Ten healthy pigs underwent laparotomy, a portion of the colon was transected, and the stent was placed within the colonic lumen at the site of resection. Pigs were sacrificed at the end of postoperative week 2, and postoperative week 4. A portion of the descending colon was resected, and tissue samples from the anastomosis, intentional defect scar, and normal bowel overlying the stent were sent for histopathologic examination. RESULTS: All ten animals survived the study. None developed any clinical signs of obstruction, infection, leakage, fistula, wound complications, or bleeding. No evidence of colonic leak or luminal stenosis/stricture was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that a polyvinyl alcohol/acellular porcine small intestine submucosa stent sewn underneath a colonic anastomosis with a 2 cm intentional defect will result in no anastomotic complications. There were also no complications from placing this stent in any pigs. Additional studies with a control group should be conducted to see if this same stent can be built in different diameters, lengths, and configurations to prevent leaks in other organs. These encouraging results will hopefully lead to decreased leaks and the need for temporary ostomies in humans.

Technical considerations depending on the level of vascular ligation in laparoscopic rectal resection.

AIM: In addition to ischemia there is also anastomotic ends tension proven to be a risk factor for anastomotic leak. HT vascular ligation is accepted as a rule, in attempt to achieve tension-free anastomosis. LT is a preferred option, based on the more accurate preservation of proximal intestinal segment microperfusion and lower risk of damage to the hypogastric plexus. The aim of this study is evaluation of comparative indicators in high tie (HT) and low tie (LT) laparoscopic rectal resections. METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized comparative cohort study of patients in our department with cancer of the rectum in clinical stage I-III, operated on in laparoscopic approach over a 6-years period. RESULTS: For the period 2015-2020, a number of 208 laparoscopic surgeries have been done for rectal cancer. Patients were divided into three groups-group A with HT vascular ligation 116 pts. (69%), group B-53 pts. (25%), underwent low ligation-LT and group C-39pts. (19%) low tie plus lymph node dissection of the apical LN group (LT-appic LND). The distribution was made without randomization, based on the operators' expertise. Anastomotic leaks were 3.8% in group A, 3.0% in group B and 2.9% in group C (p > 0.05) with no significance difference. There is no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes obtained in group A and group B, while in group C the number of the harvested lymph nodes was higher (p < 0.05). The indicators for intestinal / defecation dysfunction, as well as for urinary/sexual dysfunction, according to our data, are significantly more favorable in patients with LT, in contrast to the other two groups. CONCLUSION: HT vascular ligation attempts to achieve tension-free anastomosis and more harvested lymph nodes. However, LT could be a preferred option, based on the lack of significant evidence for a difference in specific oncological survival and due to more accurate preservation of proximal intestinal segment microperfusion to prevent anastomosis dehiscence, also for its lower risk of damage to the hypogastric plexus. Splenic flexure mobilization provides elongation of the proximal intestinal segment, but has no proven effect on anastomotic leakage incidence. It increases surgical duration and is in fact necessary in up to 30% of the cases. At the present moment there is no precise data whether LT has an advantage in terms of prevention of autonomic nervous and urogenital dysfunction. New prospective randomized and highly probative studies are needed to standardize the procedures in specific clinical situations.

Low psoas muscle area is associated with postoperative complications in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Sarcopenia correlates with increased morbidity and mortality in various medical conditions. We assessed correlations of the lean body mass marker and psoas muscle area (PMA), with postoperative outcomes in CD patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: We included patients with CD who underwent gastrointestinal surgery between June 2009 and October 2018 and had CT/MRI scans within 8 weeks preoperatively. PMA was measured bilaterally on perioperative imaging. RESULTS: Of 121 patients, the mean age was 35.98 ± 15.07 years; 51.2% were male. The mean BMI was 21.56 ± 4 kg/m2. The mean PMA was 95.12 ± 263.2cm2. Patients with postoperative complications (N = 31, 26%) had significantly lower PMA compared with patients with a normal postoperative recovery (8.5 ± 2.26 cm2 vs. 9.85 ± 2.68 cm2, P = 0.02). A similar finding was noted comparing patients with anastomotic leaks to those without anastomotic leaks (7.48 ± 0.1 cm2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.51 cm2, P = 0.04). PMA correlated with the maximum degree of complications per patient, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (Spearman's coefficient = -0.26, P = 0.004). Patients with major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) had lower mean PMA (8.12 ± 2.75 cm2 vs. 9.71 ± 2.57 cm2, P = 0.03). Associations were similar when stratifying by gender and operation urgency. On multivariate analysis, PMA (HR = 0.72/cm2, P = 0.02), operation urgency (HR = 3.84, P < 0.01), and higher white blood cell count (HR = 1.14, P = 0.02) were independent predictive factors for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: PMA is an easily measured radiographic parameter associated with postoperative complications in patients with CD undergoing bowel resection.

Identification of the clinically most relevant postoperative complications after gastrectomy: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications frequently occur after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, such as mortality and reoperations. The aim of study was to identify the clinically most relevant complications after gastrectomy, using the population-attributable fraction (PAF). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, all patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. Postoperative outcomes (morbidity, mortality, recovery and hospitalization) were evaluated. The prevalence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage and pneumonia) and of the study outcomes were calculated. The adjusted relative risk and Confidence Interval (CI) for each complication-outcome pair were calculated. Subsequently, the PAF was calculated, which represents the percentage of a given outcome occurring in the population, caused by individual complications, taking both the relative risk and the frequency in which a complication occurs into account. RESULTS: In total, 2176 patients were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest overall impact on postoperative mortality (PAF 29.2% [95% CI 19.3-39.1] and 21.6% [95% CI 10.5-32.7], respectively) and prolonged hospitalization (PAF 12.9% [95% CI 9.7-16.0] and 14.7% [95% CI 11.0-18.8], respectively). Anastomotic leakage had the greatest overall impact on re-interventions (PAF 25.1% [95% CI 20.5-29.7]) and reoperations (PAF 30.3% [95% CI 24.3-36.3]). Intra-abdominal abscesses had the largest impact on readmissions (PAF 7.0% [95% CI 3.2-10.9]). Other complications only had a small effect on these outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgical improvement programs should focus on preventing or managing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications, since these complications have the greatest overall impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy.

End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Standard anastomotic configuration for esophagogastric anastomosis is not conclusive. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of end-to-end (ETE) cervical double-layer hand-sewn anastomoses with those of end-to-side (ETS) anastomoses for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017, the clinical data of 252 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy were reviewed retrospectively. The 252 patients comprised 130 patients in the ETS group and 122 patients in the ETE group. The same surgical procedures were applied in both groups, except for esophagogastric reconstruction. Short-term outcomes including leakage, stricture, reflux, operative features, and other surgical complications were analyzed for a comparison of the two configurations. RESULTS: The ETS and ETE groups did not differ significantly in terms of leakage rate (P = 0.34), anastomotic stricture rate (P = 0.70), or postoperative reflux (P = 0.66). However, the ETS group had a longer operation time (P = 0.011), a longer anastomosis time (P < 0.001), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009) than the ETE group, and the postoperative gastric dilation rates were lower in ETE group than in the ETS group (P = 0.025). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of other postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The major postoperative complications were comparable for the two anastomotic configurations. However, the patients with ETE anastomosis showed a favorable outcome in terms of a decreasing postoperative thoracic gastric dilation rate. End-to-end anastomosis also seemed to have slight advantages in terms of shorter operation and anastomosis times as well as a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Recurring Anastomotic Leak-A Prospective Clinicopathological Investigation of a Distinct Disease Pattern.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal anastomotic insufficiency (AI) is a common problem in visceral surgery associated with overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In some patients it occurs more than once. The etiology of recurring anastomotic insufficiency (RAI) is not understood yet and should be addressed as an independent disease entity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty nine consecutive patients with AI were treated at our university center and were included in this prospective study. Clinical data were evaluated by correlative statistical analysis to identify independent risk factors for RAI. Patients were divided in two groups: 18 patients had a single operative revision until restoration (group SAI), and 21 patients had two or more revisions (group RAI). Anastomotic tissue samples as well as untouched bowel wall were collected during reoperations for analysis of MMPs and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP2). Clinical data were correlated with pathological observations. RESULTS: Significant differences of clinical and molecular pathological data were found between the two groups. Transfusion of red blood cells until the first reoperation and alcohol abuse led to RAI and were the only independent risk factors for RAI in multivariate analysis. Overexpression of MMP-8, -9, and -13 in anastomotic tissue correlated with the administration of red blood cells during initial operation. Reduced expression of TIMP2 was frequent in nearly all patients without differences throughout the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: RAI seems to have an independent disease pattern. Transfusion of blood products is not only a known risk factor for AI but seems to significantly disturb the anastomotic healing process leading to RAI.

Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is the most common major complication after esophagectomy. We investigated the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy targeted database to identify risk factors for anastomotic leak. METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer were included. Patients experiencing an anstomotic leak were identified, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Of 915 patients included, 83% were male and the median age was 64 years. Patients with anastomotic leak more frequently had additional complications (87% vs 36%, P < .001). Rates of reoperation (64% vs 11%, P < .001) and mortality (8% vs 2%, P = .001) were higher in patients with anastomotic leak. After adjusting for patient and procedure characteristics, prolonged operative time (for each additional 30-minutes; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 1.068, 95% CI, 1.022-1.115, P = .003), increased preoperative WBC count (for each 3000/µL increase; AOR 1.323, 95% CI, 1.048-1.670, P = .019), pre-existing diabetes (AOR 1.601, 95% CI, 1.012-2.534, P = .045), and perioperative transfusion (AOR 1.777, 95% CI, 1.064-2.965, P = .028) were independently associated with anastomotic leak. CONCLUSION: Both patient and procedure-related factors are associated with anastomotic leak. Though frequently non-modifiable, these findings could facilitate risk stratification and early detection of anastomotic leak to reduce associated morbidity.

Impact of omentoplasty on anastomotic leak and septic complications after low pelvic anastomosis: a study from the NSQIP database.

PURPOSE: The role of omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leak (AL) in colorectal surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of omentoplasty on AL and septic complications after low pelvic anastomosis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent segmental colectomy with low pelvic anastomosis by using 2012 targeted colectomy participant use data file. Patients were divided into two groups according to omentoplasty versus no-omentoplasty formation. AL and surgical site infections (SSIs) within postoperative 30 days were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 2891 patients (1447 [50.1%] males) with a mean age of 60.2 ± 13.0 years met the inclusion criteria. There were 86 (2.9%) and 2805 (97.1%) patients in the omentoplasty and no-omentoplasty group, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, omentoplasty neither reduced AL (p = 0.83; OR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.21-2.44) nor organ/space SSIs (p = 0.08; OR = 2.14, 95% CI, 0.91-4.41). Also, this technique did not play any role in reducing AL and organ/space SSI rates regardless of diversion with the exception of its association with higher organ/space SSIs in patients without diverting stoma (9.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.04). No differences were detected between the groups with respect to the management strategies for AL (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Omentoplasty did not decrease AL and septic complications after low pelvic anastomosis and had no impact on the postoperative management of AL.

Late leakage after anterior resection: a defunctioning stoma alters the clinical course of anastomotic leakage.

AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is common after anterior resection (AR). Long term clinical outcomes of AL including late presenting leakage (LL) are not well studied. This study was undertaken to assess clinical features of LL with respect to incidence, association with predisposing factors and need for re-intervention. METHODS: The Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) was explored for AL cases after AR for rectal cancer in patients operated in the south of Sweden from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2011. Demographic data, surgical technical details, number of postoperative days (POD) until diagnosis of AL, presenting symptoms, methods of diagnosis and treatment were retrieved from medical records. LL was defined according to different cut-offs as leakages occurring after hospital discharge (LLAHD), after 30 POD (LL ≥ POD 30) and after 90 POD (LL ≥ POD 90). RESULTS: In total, 1442 patients were operated on with AR of whom 144 cases of AL (10%) were identified. Median time from operation to follow-up was 87 months (range 21-162). LLAHD, LL ≥ POD 30 and LL ≥ POD 90 were present in 51%, 24% and 9% respectively. All categories of LL were associated with a defunctioning stoma. Relaparotomy was significantly less often employed in LLAHD, but not in other categories of LL. CONCLUSION: LL constitutes a substantial portion of all AL after AR for rectal cancer. The large proportion of LLAHD calls for awareness in the outpatient setting.

An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is a devastating postoperative complication following rectal anastomoses associated with significant clinical and oncological implications. As a result, there is a need for novel intraoperative methods that will help predict anastomotic leak. METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, patient undergoing rectal anastomoses by colorectal surgeons at our institution underwent prospective application of intraoperative flexible endoscopy with mucosal grading. Retrospective review of patient medical records was performed. After creation of the colorectal anastomosis, application of a three-tier endoscopic mucosal grading system occurred. Grade 1 was defined as circumferentially normal appearing peri-anastomotic mucosa. Grade 2 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving <30% of either the colon or rectal mucosa. Grade 3 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving >30% of the colon or rectal mucosa or ischemia/congestion involving both sides of the staple line. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2014, a total of 106 patients were reviewed. Grade 1 anastomoses were created in 92 (86.7%) patients and Grade 2 anastomoses were created in 10 (9.4%) patients. All 4 (3.8%) Grade 3 patients underwent immediate intraoperative anastomosis takedown and re-creation, with subsequent re-classification as Grade 1. Demographic and comorbidity data were similar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 patients. Anastomotic leak rate for the entire cohort was 12.2%. Grade 1 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 9.4% (9/96) and Grade 2 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 40% (4/10). Multivariate logistic regression associated Grade 2 classification with an increased risk of anastomotic leak (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.21-13.63, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic mucosal grading is a feasible intraoperative technique that has a role following creation of a rectal anastomosis. Identification of a Grade 2 or Grade 3 anastomosis should provoke strong consideration for immediate intraoperative revision.

Early Postoperative Endoscopy for Evaluation of the Anastomosis after Esophageal Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks significantly affect hospital stay after esophageal surgery. Here, we investigated the efficacy of early endoscopy for predicting anastomotic healing and leaks after esophageal reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated by cervical esophagogastrostomy underwent routine endoscopy between postoperative days 5 and 7. The anastomosis was scored for the degree of ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the anastomotic axis. Independent associations between ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the proximal esophagus and the risk of the anastomotic leak were examined using Spearman's rank correlation method. RESULTS: Assessment of the degree of mucosal ischemia in 65 patients shows well healing in 35, patch ischemia in 20, diffuse ischemia in 10, no necrosis in any patient. Stenosis was classified as 0 to 10% in 40 patients, 11 to 20% in 12, 21 to 80% in 11, and 81 to 100% in 2. The degree of torsion of the anastomotic axis was classified as 0 to 10 degrees in 52 patients, 11 to 90 degrees in 8, and 91 to 180 degrees in 5. With rising endoscopy scores, there was an increase in risk for leaks (score > 4.5, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative endoscopy facilitates the management of esophagogastrostomy anastomosis to predict leaks.

Pringle maneuver increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after colonic resection in rats.

BACKGROUND: Many centers use the Pringle's maneuver during liver resections. Since this maneuver might impair healing of bowel anastomoses, we evaluated its influence on the healing of colonic anastomosis in rats. METHODS: Male Wistar rats underwent median laparotomy and sigmoid resection with end-to-end anastomosis under inhalation anesthesia. Thereafter, rats received a 25 minutes Pringle's maneuver (PM, group 1) or were kept under anesthesia for the same period of time (group 2). The anastomotic bursting pressure (BP) was measured on postoperative days (POD) 3, 6 and 9. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining was used for histopathological evaluation of the anastomosis. The Mann-Whitney U and χ2 -tests were used, p<0.05 values were considered significant. RESULTS: All animals (n=48) lost body weight (BW) until POD3 (95.2% vs. 85.7%, p=0.003), and BW remained lower after PM (106.2% vs. 92.8%, p=0.001). The anastomotic BP was lower in group 1 compared to group 2 on POD 3 (116mmHg vs. 176.28mmHg, p=0.001), POD 6 (182.8mmHg vs. 213mmHg, p=0.029) and POD 9 (197.2mmHg vs. 251.7mmHg, p=0.009), and mortality was higher in group 1 (1 vs. 7, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Pringle's maneuver increases anastomotic complications in rats. Therefore, a Pringle's maneuver should be avoided during simultaneous liver and colorectal surgery.

Type of incision does not predict abdominal wall outcome after emergency surgery for colonic anastomotic leakage.

PURPOSE: Most literature on abdominal incision is based on patients undergoing elective surgery. In a cohort of patients with anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer resection, we analyzed the association between type of incision, fascial dehiscence, and incisional hernia. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database and merged with information from the Danish National Patient Register. All patients with anastomotic leakage after colonic resection in Denmark from 2001 until 2008 were included and surgical records on re-operations were retrieved. The primary outcome of the study was incisional hernia formation, and the secondary outcome was fascial dehiscence. Multivariable logistic, Cox, and competing risks regression analysis, as well as propensity score matching were used for confounder control. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients undergoing reoperation for anastomotic leakage were included with a median follow-up of 5.4 years. Incisional hernia occurred in 41 of 227 (15.3%) patients undergoing midline incision compared with 14 of 81 (14.7%) following transverse incision, P = 1.00. After adjusting for confounders, there was no association between the type of incision and incisional hernia (transverse incision hazard ratio 1.36, 0.68-2.72, P = 0.390) or fascial dehiscence (transverse incision odds ratio 1.66, 0.57-4.49, P = 0.331). This conclusion was confirmed after propensity score matching, P = 0.507. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, type of incision did not predict abdominal wall outcome after emergency surgery for colonic anastomotic leakage.

Comparison of three different application routes of butyrate to improve colonic anastomotic strength in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Despite extensive research, anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery. Since butyrate enemas are known to enhance anastomotic healing, several administration routes have been explored in this study. METHODS: Three intraluminal approaches involving butyrate were investigated: (1) butyrin-elucidating patch, (2) a single injection of hyaluronan-butyrate (HA-But) prior to construction of the proximal anastomosis and (3) rectal hyaluronan-butyrate (HA-But) enemas designed for distal anastomoses. The main outcome was AL and secondary outcomes were bursting pressure, histological analysis of the anastomosis, zymography to detect MMP activity and qPCR for gene expression of MMP2, MMP9, MUC2 and TFF3. RESULTS: Neither the patches nor the injections led to a reduction of AL in experiments 1 and 2. In experiment 3, a significant reduction of AL was accomplished with the (HA-But) enema compared to the control group together with a higher bursting pressure. Histological analysis detected only an increased inflammation in experiment 2 in the hyaluronan injection group compared to the control group. No other differences were found regarding wound healing. Zymography identified a decreased proenzyme of MMP9 when HA-But was administered as a rectal enema. qPCR did not show any significant differences between groups in any experiment. CONCLUSION: Butyrate enemas are effective in the enhancement of colonic anastomosis. Enhanced butyrate-based approaches designed to reduce AL in animal models for both proximal and distal anastomoses were not more effective than were butyrate enemas alone. Further research should focus on how exogenous butyrate can improve anastomotic healing after gastrointestinal surgery.

Characterization of Pancreaticojejunal Anastomotic Healing in a Porcine Survival Model.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy is the most important cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Histological studies of bowel anastomoses have provided valuable insights regarding causes of anastomotic failure. However, this crucial information is lacking for pancreatico-enteric anastomoses. METHODS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in a porcine model. Animals were survived up to 10 days and then the pancreatico-enteral anastomosis specimen was resected en bloc. Anastomotic bursting pressure was measured and histological sections of the anastomoses were examined. RESULTS: Six out of 8 animals had excellent healing of the anastomoses. One animal developed a clinically significant leak at the pancreaticoduodenal anastomosis (12.5%) and one animal had a subclinical duodeno-duodenal leak discovered on necropsy (12.5%). Both anastomoses that failed had a collagen-to-tissue ratio less than 40%. In contrast, none of the anastomoses with a ratio greater than 40% showed any evidence of disruption. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that quantitative measurement of collagen deposition at the pancreatic anastomosis provides objective assessment of healing of the pancreatic anastomosis. A survival porcine model of pancreaticoduodenectomy results in a similar leak rate to published data on pancreaticoduodenectomy in humans and will be useful for future studies assessing novel pharmacologic or technical interventions aimed at improving outcomes.

[Reasons for anastomotic leakage following the learning curve by laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reasons of anastomotic leakage following learning curve by laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.
 Methods: From December, 2011 to March, 2015, the clinical information of 179 patients in our hospital who underwent dixon of rectal cancer were collected. The patients were divided into a laparoscopic learning group, a laparotomy group and a laparoscopic group. The reasons of anastomotic leakage for each group were comparatively analyzed. Repeated cutting of anastomotic stoma was compared between the laparoscopic learning group and the laparoscopic group. The male, age, obesity, nutrition complications and the position of anastomotic stoma were compared among the 3 groups.
 Results: The rate of anastomotic leakage in the laparoscopic learning group was significantly higher than that in the laparotomy group and the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Repeated cutting was a significant risk factor in the laparoscopic learning group (P<0.05), but not in the laparoscopic group. Except obesity, the four factors were significant risk factors in the laparoscopic learning group (P<0.05). All of the five factors were not the significant risk factors in the laparotomy group and the laparoscopic group (P>0.05).
 Conclusion: The operation technical shortcoming is the major factor in the learning of the laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer. In order to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage in the learning curve period, the selection of patients following the laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer should avoid the following factors: male, older age, the low position of the tumor and the nutrition complications.

Distant Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer is a Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leakage.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether metastatic colorectal cancer (Union for International Cancer Control stage IV disease) represents a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery without major hepatic resection. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on an existing prospective colorectal database of all consecutive colorectal resections undertaken at the authors' institution from July 2002 to July 2012 (n = 2104). All patients with colorectal resection and primary anastomosis for colorectal cancer were identified (n = 500). A temporary loop ileostomy was constructed in low rectal anastomosis up to 6 cm from the anal verge (n = 128 cases, 26%). A routine contrast enema was undertaken at the occasion of other prospective studies in 254 patients. UICC stage IV disease was present in 94 patients (19%), while 406 patients (81%) had UICC stage I-III disease. RESULTS: The overall anastomotic leak rate was 2.6% (13/500), 2.2% (11/500) for both clinical and radiological leaks, and 0.8% (2/254) for radiological leaks only. Four were managed conservatively and nine (1.8%) required revision laparotomy. In the case of UICC stage IV disease, the anastomotic leak rate was 6.3% (6/94), while in the case of UICC stage I-III disease the leak rate was 1.7% (7/406). UICC stage IV disease [odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-14.4; p = 0.015] and diabetes (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.7-18.7; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer have an increased anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery. Whether this is due to an impaired immune system remains speculative.

Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Leakage According to Treatment Modality.

BACKGROUND & AIM: We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to treatment modality for gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. METHODS: Of the 19,207 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer from March 2000 to April 2013, we retrospectively analyzed the 133 cases who developed anastomotic leakage. These patients were treated using endoscopic management, surgery, or conservative management (endoscopic treatment was introduced in 2009). To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment, we compared the clinical outcomes between the conservative management-only group before 2009 and the conservative or endoscopic management group from 2009; and between the surgical management-only group before 2009 and the surgical or endoscopic management group from 2009. RESULTS: Seventy-three were initially managed conservatively, 35 were treated surgically, and 25 were treated using endoscopic procedures. Chronologically comparing each treatment group as 'before 2009' (n = 54) and 'from 2009' (n = 79), there were differences in the length of hospital stay (median 32 versus 27, p = 0.048) and duration of antibiotic use (median 28 versus 20, p = 0.013). Patients who underwent conservative or endoscopic management from 2009 showed a shorter hospital stay, period of fasting, and duration of antibiotic use than patients who underwent only conservative management before 2009. Patients who received surgery or endoscopic management from 2009 showed a shorter hospital stay and duration of antibiotic use than patients who underwent only surgery before 2009. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic management for selected cases can reduce duration of hospital stay and antibiotic administration in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy.