Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Zoo Biol ; 41(6): 576-581, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35037285

ABSTRACT

Between 2007 and 2020 at New England Aquarium, Boston, MA, USA, we implanted passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags into 728 fish representing 105 teleost and elasmobranch species to identify animals as individuals. At the time of retrospective data analysis, mean longevity interval (median, range) after tag placement for animals that remained alive (n = 236) was 4.7 years (4.5, 0.3-13.8). Mean interval (median, range) between tag placement and death (n = 317) was 2.1 years (1.6, 0-11.2); and mean interval (median, range) between tag placement and transfer to other facilities (n = 175) was 2.5 years (3.1, 0.1-9.3). Possible adverse effects of tagging were extremely rare. Using the described methods, the equipment cost for every 10 PIT tag implantations was $2.83. PIT tag implantation in fishes is a safe and cost effective method to identify individuals, providing an opportunity to accumulate valuable data regarding individual longevity, welfare, basic demographics, and outcome of medical management. PIT tag implantation is recommended as a routine aspect of acquisition, quarantine, and medical management of fish under human care.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems , Animals, Zoo , Fishes , Animals , Retrospective Studies , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/instrumentation , Animal Identification Systems/standards , Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Animal Welfare/statistics & numerical data
3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 18(7)2018 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30004457

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces both a hardware and a software system designed to allow low-cost electronic monitoring of social insects using RFID tags. Data formats for individual insect identification and their associated experiment are proposed to facilitate data sharing from experiments conducted with this system. The antennas' configuration and their duty cycle ensure a high degree of detection rates. Other advantages and limitations of this system are discussed in detail in the paper.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/economics , Bees , Radio Frequency Identification Device/economics , Software/economics , Animals , Bees/classification
4.
J Dairy Sci ; 97(12): 7515-24, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25282418

ABSTRACT

Costs and secondary benefits of implementing electronic identification (e-ID) for performance recording (i.e., lambing, body weight, inventory, and milk yield) in dairy and meat ewes were assessed by using the results from a previous study in which manual (M), semiautomatic (SA), and automatic (AU) data collection systems were compared. Ewes were identified with visual ear tags and electronic rumen boluses. The M system used visual identification, on-paper data recording, and manual data uploading to a computer. The SA system used e-ID with a handheld reader in which performances were typed and automatic uploaded to a computer. The use of a personal digital assistant (PDA) for recording and automatic data uploading, which transformed M in a SA system, was also considered. The AU system was only used for BW recording and consisted of e-ID, automatic data recording in an electronic scale, and uploading to a computer. The cost-benefit study was applied to 2 reference sheep farms of 700 meat ewes, under extensive or intensive production systems, and of 400 dairy ewes, practicing once- or twice-a-day machine milkings. Sensitivity analyses under voluntary and mandatory e-ID scenarios were also included. Benefits of using e-ID for SA or AU performance recording mainly depended on sheep farm purpose, number of test days per year, handheld reader and PDA prices, and flock size. Implementing e-ID for SA and AU performance recording saved approximately 50% of the time required by the M system, and increased the reliability of the data collected. Use of e-ID increased the cost of performance recording in a voluntary e-ID scenario, paying only partially the investment made (15 to 70%). For the mandatory e-ID scenario, in which the cost of e-ID devices was not included, savings paid 100% of the extra costs needed for using e-ID in all farm types and conditions. In both scenarios, the reader price was the most important extra cost (40 to 90%) for implementing e-ID in sheep farms. Calculated extra costs of using the PDA covered more than 100% of the implementation costs in all type of sheep farms, indicating that this device was cost-effective for sheep-performance recording.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Dairying/methods , Meat/economics , Milk/economics , Sheep/physiology , Agriculture/economics , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/methods , Animals , Body Weight , Computers, Handheld/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dairying/economics , Electronics/instrumentation , Female , Milk/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Rumen
5.
J Fish Biol ; 80(1): 181-94, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22220897

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of individual genetic tagging was determined by using passive integrated transponders (PIT) as a comparative conventional tagging method. Fifty-five common dace Leuciscus leuciscus were captured in the wild, PIT tagged and fin clipped (for DNA analysis). Thirty fish were recaptured on three occasions and tissue samples were collected. Using 18 microsatellite loci, 79-94% of the recaptures were correctly assigned. Experience with scoring L. leuciscus microsatellites led to more individuals correctly assigned. Allowing matches that differed by one or two alleles resulted in 100% of all recaptures successfully assigned irrespective of the observer. Reducing the set of loci to five to six loci appropriately selected did not affect the assignment rate, demonstrating that costs can be subsequently reduced. Despite their potential benefits, the application of genetic tags for teleosts has been limited. Here, it was demonstrated that genetic tagging could be applied, and a clear guideline (flowchart) is provided on how this method can be developed for teleosts and other organisms, with subsequent practical applications to ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation management.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/methods , Cyprinidae/genetics , Ecology/methods , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animals , Reproducibility of Results
6.
J Dairy Sci ; 91(4): 1438-42, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18349236

ABSTRACT

A total of 24 Murciano-Granadina dairy goats in early-midlactation were used to compare the labor time and data collection efficiency of using manual (M) vs. semiautomated (SA) systems for milk recording. Goats were milked once daily in a 2 x 12 parallel platform, with 6 milking units on each side. The M system used visual identification (ID) by large plastic ear tags, on-paper data recording, and data manually uploaded to a computer. The SA system used electronic ID, automatic ID, manual data recording on reader keyboard, and automatic data uploading to computer by Bluetooth connection. Data were collected for groups of 2 x 12 goats for 15 test days of each system during a period of 70 d. Time data were converted to a decimal scale. No difference in milk recording time between M and SA (1.32 +/- 0.03 and 1.34 +/- 0.03 min/goat, respectively) was observed. Time needed for transferring data to the computer was greater for M when compared with SA (0.20 +/- 0.01 and 0.05 +/- 0.01 min/goat). Overall milk recording time was greater in M than in SA (1.52 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.39 +/- 0.04 min/goat), the latter decreasing with operator training. Time for transferring milk recording data to the computer was 4.81 +/- 0.34 and 1.09 +/- 0.10 min for M and SA groups of 24 goats, respectively, but only increased by 0.19 min in SA for each additional 24 goats. No difference in errors of data acquisition was detected between M and SA systems during milk recording (0.6%), but an additional 1.1% error was found in the M system during data uploading. Predicted differences between M and SA increased with the number of goats processed on the test-day. Reduction in labor time cost ranged from euro0.5 to 12.9 (US$0.7 to 17.4) per milk recording, according to number of goats from 24 to 480 goats and accounted for 40% of the electronic ID costs. In conclusion, electronic ID was more efficient for labor costs and resulted in fewer data errors, the benefit being greater with trained operators and larger goat herds.


Subject(s)
Dairying/methods , Data Collection/methods , Goats , Milk/physiology , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Animals , Dairying/economics , Data Collection/economics , Data Collection/standards , Female , Humans , Regression Analysis , Time Factors
7.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci ; 21(2): 108-119, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28933952

ABSTRACT

Records of 4,455 sheltered dogs were analyzed to compare the numbers of traceable (able to be reunited with original caregivers) and untraceable (unable to be reunited with original caregivers) dogs before (Period 1) and after (Period 2) introduction of a mandatory microchipping. Records were also used to compare the numbers of microchipped dogs, to compare dogs' reunification with caregivers, and to estimate possible financial savings. In Period 1, 51.8% of the dogs were untraceable (median length of stay = 14 days) and 48.2% were traceable (median length of stay = 1 day). Of all traceable dogs, 24.5% were microchipped, and 67.5% of microchipped dogs were traceable. In Period 2, 57.1% of dogs were traceable (median length of stay = 0 days), and 42.9% were untraceable (median length of stay = 12 days). Of all traceable dogs, 61.4% had a microchip, and 80% of microchipped dogs were traceable. In Period 2, authorities saved more than US$43,400 on unreclaimed dog care. Mandatory microchipping of dogs appears to be an effective measure to increase reunification of sheltered dogs, decrease length of stay, and save authority funds.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Dogs , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Welfare , Animals , Czech Republic , Mandatory Programs/economics
8.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci ; 20(1): 52-64, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27715313

ABSTRACT

Companion animal overpopulation is a growing problem in the United States. In addition to strays, an average of 324,500 nonhuman animals are relinquished to shelters yearly by their caregivers due to family disruption (divorce, death), foreclosure, economic problems, or minor behavioral issues. As a result, estimates of animals in shelters range from 3 million to 8 million, and due to overcrowding, euthanasia is common. This analysis seeks to determine the appropriate pricing mechanisms to clear animal shelters of dogs in the manner most desirable-that is, through adoption. Based on a survey of Michigan residents, it is clear there are a number of correlations between the traits of dogs and the individuals who care for them. Hedonic pricing models indicate that animal shelters need to proactively vary their pricing systems to discount particular traits, specifically for mixed-breed, older, and black dogs. Premiums can be charged for puppies, purebred dogs, and those who have received specific services such as microchipping.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare/economics , Pets/economics , Adult , Aged , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Costs and Cost Analysis , Dogs , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Ownership/economics , Regression Analysis
9.
Can Vet J ; 46(11): 1042-6, 2005 Nov.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16363334

ABSTRACT

"Brand" means a permanent identification mark of which the letters, numbers and figures used are each three (3) inches or more in length or diameter and are humanely burned into the hide of a live animal with a hot iron or tattoo or caustic chemical substance and is to be considered in relation to its location on the animal and the term relates to both the mark and location.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Animal Welfare , International Cooperation , Pain/veterinary , Ruminants , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/methods , Animals , Canada , Commerce , Hot Temperature , Humans , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , United States
10.
C R Biol ; 325(2): 165-70, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11980177

ABSTRACT

Global Positioning System (GPS) is an important new technology for spatio-temporal behaviour studies of animals. Differential correction improves location accuracy. Previously, it mostly removed partially the influence of Selective Availability (SA). SA was deactivated in May 2000. The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of SA cancellation on location accuracy of various GPS receivers. We tested the accuracy of locations obtained from non-differential and differential GPS animal collars before and after SA removal. We found a significant improvement in accuracy for both types of GPS collars. However, differential GPS still provides more accurate locations.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/instrumentation , Animal Migration , Ethology/instrumentation , Spacecraft , Spatial Behavior , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animals , Animals, Wild/physiology , Equipment Design , Ethology/economics , Exploratory Behavior
11.
Prev Vet Med ; 30(2): 121-35, 1997 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9234416

ABSTRACT

Four national identification and recording (I&R) systems for the Belgian pig industry were evaluated economically, using a computer simulation model. These systems were: (1) the previous system; (2) a revised system (based on the previous one); (3) a system based on electronic identification; (4) a system similar to (3) but which also allows electronic monitoring of individual pigs. The evaluation of the systems particularly concerned their use in the control of classical swine fever (CSF). Four factors have shown to be very influential in economic decision making with respect to I&R systems: (1) the economic losses per CSF epidemic; (2) the frequency of CSF epidemics; (3) the operational costs of the I&R system; (4) the possibility of additional use of the system besides CSF control. It was concluded that for the Belgian situation, replacement of the previous I&R system by the revised one is economically justifiable. Because of high operational costs, electronic identification systems are only economically feasible in very specific situations, e.g. when a higher degree of additional use is possible or with a relatively high frequency of CSF epidemics.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/standards , Swine , Animal Husbandry/economics , Animals , Belgium/epidemiology , Classical Swine Fever/economics , Classical Swine Fever/epidemiology , Computer Simulation , Decision Making , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Female , Male , Models, Biological , Models, Economic , Models, Theoretical , Prevalence , Swine Diseases/economics , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
12.
Rev Sci Tech ; 20(2): 510-22, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11548523

ABSTRACT

Traceback systems for cattle and small ruminants are of international concern after the outbreaks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the European Union and foot and mouth disease in the United Kingdom and South America. Implementation of a national or international identification system depends on meeting a balance between cost, reliability/durability, ease of use, data transfer speed, protection from fraud, avoidance of entry into the food chain and animal welfare issues. As of 1 January 2001, Canada has instituted a national identification programme for cattle, which will have annual operating and administrative costs of Can$0.20 per head, excluding ear tags. The system will provide herd of origin traceback and individual animal identification by ear tags for all beef cattle. A number of identification technologies are available that would have advantages over visual tags, but these are currently too costly without government support (electronic identification, deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] fingerprinting), too slow (DNA fingerprinting) or have not been tested sufficiently (retinal imaging) to warrant mandatory inclusion in a national traceback/identification system.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Cattle , Goats , Sheep , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/methods , Animal Welfare , Animals , Canada , DNA Fingerprinting/veterinary , Ear , Electronics , Retinal Vessels/anatomy & histology , Tattooing/veterinary
13.
Rev Sci Tech ; 20(2): 385-405, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11552703

ABSTRACT

Individual animal identification is an important consideration for many countries to improve animal traceback systems. The analysis presented by the authors provides a conceptual benefit-cost framework for evaluating the economic usefulness of improved animal identification systems designed to reduce the consequences of foreign animal diseases (FAD). For cattle in situations similar to those found in the United States of America, results show that improved levels of animal identification may provide sufficient economic benefits, in terms of the reduced consequences of FAD, to justify the improvements. In contrast, the results of similar studies in swine show that the economic benefits of the reduced FAD consequences are not sufficient to justify improvements in animal identification systems. Vertically integrated industries, in which animals have only one owner in a closed system from birth to slaughter, may not require individual animal identification for traceback purposes. However, additional benefits, not quantified in this analysis, could contribute to favourable benefit-cost ratios for improved identification in certain sectors of the swine industry.


Subject(s)
Animal Diseases/prevention & control , Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Animal Diseases/economics , Animal Diseases/transmission , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Welfare , Animals , Belgium , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Commerce/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Outbreaks/economics , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Swine , Swine Diseases/economics , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/transmission , United States , Zoonoses
16.
Prev Vet Med ; 110(3-4): 323-8, 2013 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23317567

ABSTRACT

In this study our aim was to value the benefits of rapid effective trace-back capability-based on a livestock identification system - in the event of a foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreak. We simulated an FMD outbreak in the Texas High Plains, an area of high livestock concentration, beginning in a large feedlot. Disease spread was simulated under different time dependent animal tracing scenarios. In the specific scenario modeled (incursion of FMD within a large feedlot, detection within 14 days and 90% effective tracing), simulation suggested that control costs of the outbreak significantly increase if tracing does not occur until day 10 as compared to the baseline of tracing on day 2. In addition, control costs are significantly increased if effectiveness were to drop to 30% as compared to the baseline of 90%. Results suggest potential benefits from rapid effective tracing in terms of reducing government control costs; however, a variety of other scenarios need to be explored before determining in which situations rapid effective trace-back capability is beneficial.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Animal Identification Systems/methods , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Animal Husbandry/economics , Animal Husbandry/instrumentation , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animal Identification Systems/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/virology , Computer Simulation , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Models, Biological , Texas/epidemiology , Time Factors
19.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci ; 49(6): 826-31, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21205448

ABSTRACT

The mouse is the most commonly used laboratory animal, accounting for up to 80% of all mammals used in research studies. Because rodents generally are group-housed, an efficient system of uniquely identifying individual animals for use in research studies, breeding, and proper colony management is required. Several temporary and permanent methods (for example, ear punching and toe clipping) are available for labeling research mice and other small animals, each with advantages and disadvantages. This report describes a new radiofrequency identification tagging method that uses 500-µm, light-activated microtransponders implanted subcutaneously into the ear or tail of mice. The preferred location for implanting is in the side of the tail, because implantation at this site was simple to perform and was associated with shorter implantation times (average, 53 versus 325 s) and a higher success rate (98% versus 50%) compared with the ear. The main benefits of using light-activated microtransponders over other identification methods, including other radiofrequency identification tags, is their small size, which minimizes stress to the animals during implantation and low cost due to their one-piece (monolithic) design. In addition, the implantation procedure uses a custom-designed 21-gauge needle injector and does not require anesthetization of the mice. We conclude that this method allows improved identification and management of laboratory mice.


Subject(s)
Animal Identification Systems/methods , Mice , Radio Frequency Identification Device/methods , Animal Identification Systems/economics , Animals , Animals, Laboratory/surgery , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Radio Frequency Identification Device/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL