Neutralization of Acidic Tumor Microenvironment (TME) with Daily Oral Dosing of Sodium Potassium Citrate (K/Na Citrate) Increases Therapeutic Effect of Anti-cancer Agent in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mice Model.

Extracellular pH (pHe) of tumor cells is characteristic of tumor microenvironment (TME). Acidic TME impairs the responses of tumors to some anti-cancer chemotherapies. In this study, we showed that daily oral dosing of sodium potassium citrate (K/Na citrate) increased blood HCO3- concentrations, corresponding to increase of HCO3- concentrations and pHs in urine, and neutralized the tumor pHe. Neutralization of acidic TME by alkaline substance like HCO3-, an active metabolite of K/Na citrate, well potentiated the therapeutic effect of anticancer agent TS-1®, an orally active 5-fuluoro-uracil derivative, in Panc-1 pancreatic cancer-xenograft murine model. Neutralization of acidic TME by using an alkaline K/Na citrate is a smart approach for enhancement of the therapeutic effects of anticancer agents for pancreatic cancer in the end stage.

Lack of almagate interference in breath test results for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis (Almatest study). / Ausencia de interferencia de almagato en los resultados de la prueba de aliento para el diagnóstico de Helicobacter pylori (estudio Almatest).

OBJECTIVE: The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori. Debate continues to surround the possible interference of antacid intake on its result. This study aims to confirm the non-interference of almagate in the determination of H. pylori by UBT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, multicentre study in adult patients treated with almagate in whom a UBT (TAUKIT®) was indicated. When the UBT result was negative, use of almagate was stopped for 30 days and the UBT was repeated. When the result was positive, no further determinations were made. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who, having had a negative result in the first breath test, were positive in the second after having stopped taking almagate (UBT false negatives, possibly attributable to almagate). RESULTS: Of the 167 evaluable patients, 59% were female, average age was 49 and 97% had gastrointestinal symptoms. The result of the first UBT was negative in 71% of cases. Of these, in the second UBT test after stopping the almagate, the negative result was confirmed in 97.5%. Out of the total number of cases evaluated, the rate of false negatives was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Taking almagate has minimal or no interference in the result of UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. It can therefore be used in the weeks prior to a UBT.

A Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker-Based Regimen as Second-Line Therapy Improves Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although a potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB)-based regimen improves the rate of successful Helicobacter pylori first-line eradication, the efficacy of a PCAB-based regimen as second-line therapy is unclear. The aim of this study is to compare the success of second-line eradication of H. pylori using PCAB and proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based regimens. METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 624 patients who underwent second-line H. pylori eradication were enrolled. A standard triple regimen for second-line H. pylori eradication includes metronidazole 250 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and PPI or PCAB twice daily for 7 days. The success of eradication was compared using intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and propensity-score matching analysis. RESULTS: All patients completed the 7-day course of therapy. Patients using a PCAB-based regimen had a higher rate of eradication than those using a PPI-based regimen in both intention-to-treat (90% [298/330] vs. 85% [250/294], p = 0.045) and per-protocol analyses (96% [298/309] vs. 91% [250/274], p = 0.008). Adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Propensity score matching analysis acquired 274 matched pairs. Patients using a PCAB-based regimen had a higher rate of eradication than those using a PPI-based regimen (96% [264/274] vs. 91% [250/274], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: PCAB-based second-line H. pylori eradication is significantly better than PPI-based therapy.

Reno-protective effects of oral alkalizing agents in chronic kidney disease with aciduria: protocol for a randomized cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Aciduria caused by urinary excretion of acidic metabolic wastes produced in daily life is known to be augmented in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). To evaluate the reno-protective effect of oral alkalizing agents for the improvement of metabolic acidosis and neutralization of intratubular pH in the patients with mild stages of CKD. Also, to identify reno-protective surrogate markers in the serum and urine that can closely associate the effect of urine alkalization. METHODS: In this single-centered, open-labeled, randomized cohort study, patients with CKD stages G2, G3a and G3b, who visited and were treated at Tohoku University Hospital during the enrollment period were registered. We administered sodium bicarbonate or sodium-potassium citrate as the oral alkalinizing agents. A total of 150 patients with CKD will be randomly allocated into the following three groups: sodium bicarbonate, sodium-potassium citrate and standard therapy group without any alkalinizing agents. The data of performance status, venous blood test, spot urine test, venous blood-gas test, electrocardiogram, renal arterial ultrasonography and chest X-ray will be collected at 0, 6, 12 and 24 weeks (short-term study) from starting the interventions. These data will be also collected at 1 and 2 years (long-term study). The samples of plasma and serum and early-morning urine at every visit will be acquired for the analysis of renal function and surrogate uremic biomarkers. The recruitment for this cohort study terminated in March, 2018, and the follow-up period for all the enrolled subjects will be terminated in December, 2020. The primary endpoint will be the development of originally-defined significant renal dysfunction or the occurrence of any cerebrovascular disease in the short-term study. The secondary endpoint will be the same endpoints as in the long-term study, or the patients with significant changes in the suggested the surrogate biomarkers. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study will address the importance of taking oral alkalizing agents in the patients with early stages of CKD, furthermore they could address any new surrogate biomarkers that can be useful from early stage CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered Report Identifier: UMIN000010059 and jRCT021180043. The trial registration number; 150. Date of registration; 2013/02/26.

Chewable Antacid Tablets: Are Disintegration Tests Relevant?

A recently published FDA guidance on chewable tablets has addressed the quality attributes of this class of dosage forms. This study evaluated disintegration as a quality attribute for a number of commercially available chewable antacid tablets. Additionally, acid-neutralizing-capacity values were evaluated. A number of the products exhibited prolonged disintegration times-which were far longer than those of conventional immediate-release tablets. The mean disintegration times ranged from 6 to more than 60 min in distilled water and from 9 to over 60 min in 0.1 N HCl. The products with longer disintegration times had higher breaking force and tensile strength values. Despite the range in disintegration times, all products met the criteria for acid-neutralizing capacity. These results indicate a need for patients to be aware of the need to thoroughly chew antacid tablets upon administration. Given these considerations, disintegration testing would be a useful quality control test in evaluating these dosage forms as the implicit assumption by the manufacturer that patients will chew the product sufficiently may not be met in every case.

Half-dose clarithromycin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy is effective and economical in treating Helicobacter pylori infection: A single-center, open-label, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy has been recommended as the first-line therapy for H pylori infection in China. However, its expensive cost and high antibiotic-related adverse reactions are always haunting us. To find a safer, more cost-effective, and high eradicative strategy for Helicobacter treatment, we investigated the efficacy of 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy and different doses of clarithromycin in the first-line treatment. METHOD: A total of 210 patients with H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to half-dose clarithromycin group (esomeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, clarithromycin 250 mg bid, and bismuth potassium citrate 0.6 g bid) for 14 days or standard-dose clarithromycin group (esomeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, and bismuth potassium citrate 0.6 g bid) for 14 days. A 13 C-urea breath test (13 C-UBT) was performed at least 4 weeks after treatment. The eradication rate of H pylori, the incidence of side effects, and the cost-effectiveness of regimens were evaluated in this study. RESULTS: The eradication frequencies were 86.67% for both groups in the intention-to-treat analysis, while the per-protocol eradication rates were 91% vs. 91.92% (p=0.817). The incidence of adverse events was higher in standard dose group (54.21% vs. 34.29%; p=0.004), especially bitter taste symptom. There was a higher level of costs per person associated with the standard-dose group as compared with half-dose group (ï¿¥804.3 vs ï¿¥654.36). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the half dose was less than that of the standard dose (7.55 vs 9.16 CNY per percent). CONCLUSIONS: A 14-day half-dose clarithromycin-containing bismuth quadruple regimen is as effective as the standard bismuth quadruple therapy at eradicating H pylori, which is better tolerated and more economical. (ChiCTR-ROC-15007406).

Cefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth as first-line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients allergic to penicillin.

BACKGROUND: Eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection is clinically challenging, notably in cases with penicillin allergy. Cephalosporin could be used in lieu of amoxicillin to eradicate Helicobacter pylori. The current work aimed to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety of a cefuroxime-based quadruple regimen in treatment-naïve individuals with penicillin allergy, as well as patient compliance. METHODS: In the present prospective single-center cohort study, 152 Helicobacter pylori infected individuals with penicillin allergy received eradication therapy with cefuroxime (500 mg twice/day), levofloxacin (500 mg once/day), esomeprazole (20 mg twice/day) and bismuth potassium citrate (220 mg twice/day; 14 days). Safety and compliance were evaluated 1 to 3 days upon eradication. The urea breath test was carried out 8 to 12 weeks upon eradication for efficacy assessment. RESULTS: This quadruple antimicrobial regimen eradicated the pathogen at 85.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79.6-90.8%), 88.4% (95% CI 83.0-93.2%) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.2-94.4%) in intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively, with resistance rates of 4.6 and 40.0% in the background of cefuroxime and levofloxacin, respectively. Meanwhile, 21.3% of patients had adverse reactions, but none was serious. A total of 95.3% of patients showed good compliance. Poor compliance and cefuroxime resistance were detected by uni- or multivariate analyses as independent factors predicting therapeutic failure. Eradication rates in patients with dual levofloxacin and cefuroxime susceptibility, isolated levofloxacin resistance, isolated cefuroxime resistance and dual resistance were 97.2, 84.0, 50.0, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Cefuroxime, levofloxacin, esomeprazole, and bismuth achieved decent efficacy, safety and compliance as first-line antimicrobial regimen in patients with Helicobacter pylori and penicillin allergy.

Drug-induced osteoporosis/osteomalacia: analysis in the French and Spanish pharmacovigilance databases.

INTRODUCTION: Osteomalacia and osteoporosis are two metabolic bone disorders that increase the risk of fracture due to several causes. In terms of drugs, apart from corticosteroids, which are known to induce bone disorders, several other drugs used in chronic disease management have also been linked with an increased risk of osteoporosis and osteomalacia. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe spontaneous reports of drug-induced osteoporosis and osteomalacia in the French (FPVDB) and Spanish (SPVDB) pharmacovigilance databases. METHODS: Data were provided by the FPVDB and SPVDB. All reports of osteoporosis and osteomalacia recorded from 1985 up to 31 December 2015 inclusive were selected. Taking the time to onset of bone loss into account, all cases occurring in less than 1 month were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 369 reports (44 cases of osteomalacia, 325 cases of osteoporosis) were registered in the FPVDB and 64 (22 cases of osteomalacia, 42 cases of osteoporosis) in the SPVDB. In France, the top 5 drugs involved in the onset of osteoporosis were corticosteroids accounting for approximately half of the reports (n = 170) followed by systemic antiviral (n = 87), antacid (n = 29), antiepileptic (n = 27) and antithrombotic (n = 24) drugs. The 2 main classes of drugs implicated in osteomalacia were systemic antiretroviral drugs for half of the reports (n = 21) and antiepileptic drugs (n = 15). In Spain, corticosteroids were involved in 35.7% of reported cases of osteoporosis (n = 15) followed by systemic antiviral drugs (n = 12). There was no spontaneous report for antacid drugs. For osteomalacia, the 2 main drug classes were systemic antiretroviral drugs (n = 18, 81.8%) followed by antiepileptics (n = 2, 9.0%). In both countries, concomitant administration of systemic corticosteroids with other suspected drugs did not significantly modify the time to onset of drug-induced osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Despite some differences between the French and Spanish PVDBs, our data consistently show that bone loss is not only restricted to glucocorticoids but also involves antivirals, antiepileptic drugs, antacid drugs or antidepressants. Further analysis might prove useful in exploring the characteristics of drug-induced bone loss on a larger scale.

Oral Methods of Urinary Alkalinization for High-dose Methotrexate Administration: Alternatives to Intravenous Sodium Bicarbonate During a Critical Drug Shortage.

A nationwide shortage of intravenous (IV) sodium bicarbonate required institutions to explore alternative options for urinary alkalinization for high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX). Children's Hospital Colorado implemented a protocol utilizing oral alkalinizing agents as alternatives to intravenous sodium bicarbonate during the shortage. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of oral alkalinization strategies for HDMTX administration. This retrospective study was conducted at a pediatric institution and evaluated cycles of HDMTX administered with at least one dose of oral sodium bicarbonate tablets or sodium citrate-citric acid oral solution. The time to achieve urine pH of ≥7 was 3.48 hours from the start of alkalinization. A median dose of 66.4 mEq/m/day of oral sodium bicarbonate was administered to maintain a urine pH of ≥7 until methotrexate was cleared. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred with 43% of HDMTX cycles and patients switched to IV sodium acetate in 25.5% of HDMTX cycles, primarily due to inadequate alkalinization or intolerance. During a shortage of IV sodium bicarbonate, oral alkalinization is an effective strategy for most patients to allow for administration of HDMTX.

Retrospective Analysis Confirms Tetracycline Quadruple as Best Helicobacter pylori Regimen in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Declining Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates have prompted a switch in first-line therapy from standard triple (PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) to bismuth-based quadruple therapy. A caveat of the ACG 2017 H. pylori treatment guidelines was a paucity of recent US eradication data. AIM: To determine Rhode Island H. pylori eradication data, in the largest US study from the last two decades. METHODS: Electronic records were queried for patients with H. pylori infection diagnosed by pathology, urea breath test, or stool antigen from 2015 to 2017. Demographics, diagnostic test, treatment regimen, and test of cure were extracted. Eradication rates were calculated, and treatment regimens were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1710 patients were identified (64% female): 825 (46%) diagnosed by breath test, 755 (42%) by biopsy, and 191 (12%) by stool antigen. Full data were obtained on 1101 patients. Seven regimens were used: quadruple (64%), triple (25%), doxycycline quadruple (5%), and miscellaneous (6%). Quadruple was superior to triple: (85% vs. 75%, P = 0.002), quadruple 14 days versus triple 14 days (87% vs. 79%, P = 0.0052), quadruple 10 days versus triple 10 days (77% vs. 67%, P = 0.33). Increased therapy length improved eradication (quadruple 14 days  vs. 10 days, 87% vs. 77%, P = 0.002; triple 14 days  versus 10 days 79% vs. 67%, P = 0.13). Finally, substituting doxycycline for tetracycline yielded lower eradication (85% vs. 67%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Quadruple therapy is superior to triple therapy within the Rhode Island population. Fourteen-day therapy achieves superior eradication compared to 10-day therapy, and doxycycline is inferior to tetracycline for quadruple therapy. Our findings support adherence to ACG and international guidelines advising 14-day quadruple therapy.

Concomitant use of capecitabine and proton pump inhibitors - Is it safe?

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is a commonly used oral chemotherapy agent. Recent data suggest that concurrent use of proton pump inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of capecitabine by decreasing its absorption through increased gastric pH. Since proton pump inhibitors are widely used, we evaluated the supportive evidence for the probability of occurrence and potential seriousness of this drug interaction. METHODS: The probability of occurrence was evaluated based on the clinical, pharmacokinetic and in vitro evidence using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale. The possibility of seriousness was assessed based on the potential impact on the therapeutic intent of capecitabine therapy. RESULTS: The probability of occurrence of the interaction is doubtful. Clinical findings from two retrospective post hoc analyses showed inconsistent trends towards reduced survival. Pharmacokinetics studies found no significant decrease in systemic capecitabine level with concurrent gastric acid suppression with antacid or food intake. In vitro data do not support the proposed mechanism of reduced capecitabine absorption due to increased gastric pH. The possibility of seriousness varies depending on the treatment intent of capecitabine therapy. The most and least serious possible outcome would be reduced possibility of cure or survival and symptom control, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the possible outcome may be serious, the probability of interaction between capecitabine and proton pump inhibitors is doubtful. Therefore, we suggest that intervention should be limited to minimal change to existing therapy plan. This may include routinely ascertaining the need for proton pump inhibitor use. Alternate acid suppressing agents may be considered based on the therapeutic intent of capecitabine therapy.

Formulation, optimization, and evaluation of raft-forming formulations containing Nizatidine.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this research is to formulate, optimize, and evaluate raft-forming chewable tablets of Nizatidine. Various raft-forming agents were used in preliminary screening. Sodium alginate showed maximum raft strength, so tablets were prepared using sodium alginate as the raft forming agent, along with calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as antacid and raft strengthening agent, and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) as a gas generating agent. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Raft forming chewable tablets containing Nizatidine were prepared by direct compression and wet granulation methods, and evaluated for drug content, acid neutralization capacity, raft strength, and in-vitro drug release in 0.1 N HCl. Box-Behnken design was used for optimization. RESULTS: Two optimized formulations were predicted from the design space. The first optimized recommended concentrations of the independent variables were predicted to be X1 = 275.92 mg, X2 = 28.60 mg, and X3 = 202.14 mg for direct compression technique and the second optimized recommended concentrations were predicted to be X1 = 253.62 mg, X2 = 24.60 mg, and X3 = 201.77 mg for wet granulation technique. Optimized formulations were stable at accelerated environmental testing for six months at 35 °C and 45 °C with 75% relative humidity. X-Ray showed that the raft floated immediately after ingestion and remained intact for ∼3 h. CONCLUSION: Raft was successfully formed and optimized. Upon chewing tablets, a raft is formed on stomach content. That results in rapid relief of acid burning symptoms and delivering the drug into systemic circulation with enhanced bioavailability.

14 day sequential therapy versus 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in the first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomized trial.

Background: Whether extending the treatment length and the use of high-dose esomeprazole may optimize the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication remains unknown. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of optimized 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in first-line therapy. Methods: We recruited 620 adult patients (≥20 years of age) with H. pylori infection naive to treatment in this multicentre, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 14 day sequential therapy or 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy, both containing esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Those who failed after 14 day sequential therapy received rescue therapy with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and vice versa. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate in the first-line therapy. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156855. Results: The eradication rates of 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy were 91.3% (283 of 310, 95% CI 87.4%-94.1%) and 91.6% (284 of 310, 95% CI 87.8%-94.3%) in the ITT analysis, respectively (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -4.7% to 4.4%, P = 0.886). However, the frequencies of adverse effects were significantly higher in patients treated with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy than those treated with 14 day sequential therapy (74.4% versus 36.7% P < 0.0001). The eradication rate of 14 day sequential therapy in strains with and without 23S ribosomal RNA mutation was 80% (24 of 30) and 99% (193 of 195), respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Optimized 14 day sequential therapy was non-inferior to, but better tolerated than 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and both may be used in first-line treatment in populations with low to intermediate clarithromycin resistance.

New single capsule of bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus quadruple therapy consisting of bismuth, omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a Chinese prospective, randomized, multicentre trial.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of omeprazole given with the new single capsule of bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline (OBMT) compared with quadruple treatment consisting of omeprazole, bismuth, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (OBAC) for Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients. Methods: This single-blind, randomized multicentre trial was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in China between January 2013 and April 2014. Patients were randomized to receive 10 days of OBMT therapy or 10 days of OBAC therapy. Our primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate, confirmed by negative [13C]urea breath tests 20-25 days after the end of omeprazole maintenance. Antibiotic resistance was determined by Etest. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-TRC-13003143. Results: One hundred and ninety-two patients received OBMT therapy and 192 received OBAC therapy. There was no significant difference between the eradication rates achieved by OBMT and OBAC in either the ITT analysis (86.46% versus 87.50%, P = 0.762) or the PP analysis (94.58% versus 93.06%, P = 0.563). The efficacies of OBMT and OBAC were not affected by metronidazole or clarithromycin resistance. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for both treatments were similar; gastrointestinal and CNS symptoms were the most commonly reported. Conclusions: The new single-capsule OBMT quadruple therapy is as effective and well tolerated as the widely used OBAC therapy for treatment of H. pylori in clinical practice in China. In addition, this OBMT therapy largely overcomes H. pylori metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of YH4808, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, after single- and multiple-oral dosing in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: YH4808 is a potassium-competitive acid blocker, developed for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Two clinical studies in healthy male subjects were conducted to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of YH4808. METHODS: The first study, a randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study, compared pharmacokinetics of YH4808 (300 mg) after a single dose at fed state with a standard or a high-fat meal to those at fasted state. The second study, a randomized, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study, investigated pharmacokinetics at fasted or fed state with a standard meal after twice daily dose of YH4808 (100 mg) for 7 days. Bloods for pharmacokinetic evaluation were sampled up to 48 h post-dose and 24 h post-dose at steady state, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental method. RESULTS: After single dosing, the geometric means of maximum plasma concentration increased by 1.2 and 2.1 times in the fed states with a standard meal and a high-fat meal, respectively, of that in fasted state. Corresponding values of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable time point increased by 1.8 and 2.8 times, respectively. After multiple dosing, the geometric mean for 24-h AUC at steady state slightly increased in fed state by 1.1 times of that in fasted state. CONCLUSIONS: As fat content of the food increased, the systemic exposure of YH4808 after single dosing increased. However, systemic exposures at steady state after multiple dosing between fasted and fed states were similar. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry no.: NCT01520012.

Alkalinized Lidocaine Preloaded Endotracheal Tube Cuffs Reduce Emergence Cough After Brief Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Alkalinized lidocaine in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff decreases the incidence of cough and throat pain on emergence after surgery lasting more than 2 hours. However, alkalinized lidocaine needs 60-120 minutes to cross the ETT cuff membrane; therefore, its usefulness in shorter duration surgery is unknown. This prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial tested the hypothesis that alkalinized lidocaine would reduce the incidence of emergence cough after surgeries lasting <120 minutes. METHODS: After local ethics board approval, American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients consented to be randomized into 1 of 2 groups receiving either alkalinized lidocaine (group AL) or saline (group S) to inflate the ETT cuff. Cuffs were prefilled >90 minutes before intubation with either 2 mL of 2% lidocaine and 8 mL of 8.4% bicarbonate (group AL) or 10 mL of normal saline (group S). Cuffs were emptied immediately before intubation. After intubation, either 2 mL of 2% lidocaine (AL) or 2 mL of saline (S) were injected into the cuff. Additional 8.4% bicarbonate (AL) or saline (S) was injected into the cuff until there was no air leak. Anesthesia was maintained using desflurane, rocuronium, and either fentanyl or sufentanil to maintain vital signs within 20% of baseline values. Opioids administered in prophylaxis of extubation cough were proscribed. A standardized "no touch" emergence technique was used. A blinded assessor noted any cough above 0.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of expired desflurane. At 0.2 MAC, once every 30 seconds, the patient was instructed to open his eyes and extubation occurred once a directed response was noted. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were randomized and 100 patients in each group completed the experimental protocol. The incidence of extubation cough in group AL was 12%, significantly lower (1-sided P = .045) than the 22% incidence in group S. The 1-tailed risk ratio for cough in group AL was 0.55 (0-0.94, P = .045). Total amount of opioids administered (P = .194), ETT cuff preloading times (P = .259), and extubation times (P = .331) were not significantly different between groups. The average duration of surgery was 59 ± 28 minutes in group AL and 52 ± 29 minutes in group S (P = .057). CONCLUSIONS: Alkalinized lidocaine in the ETT cuff significantly decreased general anesthesia emergence cough after surgeries with an average duration of slightly <1 hour.

Gaviscon® Advance alone versus co-prescription of Gaviscon® Advance and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVES: Management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) typically comprises alginates and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone or in combination, yet evidence to support any particular treatment regimen is lacking. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of Gaviscon® Advance alone versus co-prescription with a PPI in treating LPR. METHODS: One hundred consecutive LPR patients with a reflux symptom index (RSI) score > 10 attending our joint voice clinic (JVC) were studied prospectively. All were treated with Gaviscon® Advance four times daily. If patients had been started on a PPI prior to their JVC attendance, this was optimised to a twice-daily dosing regimen and continued. RSI scores were recorded at first attendance and 3 months post-treatment via postal questionnaire. Scores were analysed using t tests and Levene's test for equality of variances. RESULTS: Follow-up RSI scores were returned by 72 patients, 39 of whom were treated with Gaviscon® Advance only (group A) and 33 with Gaviscon® Advance + PPI (group B). Mean pre-treatment RSI scores were similar between groups [group A: 19.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) ± 2.4; group B: 21.3, 95% CI ± 3.2 (p = 0.65)]. No significant differences were observed with respect to 3-month post-treatment RSI scores [group A: 9.9, 95% CI ± 2.8; group B: 12.6, 95% CI ± 4.2 (p = 0.82)] and change in RSI scores [group A: 9.3, 95% CI ± 3.0; group B: 8.7, 95% CI ± 2.9 [p = 0.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Gaviscon® Advance alone is effective in treating symptoms of LPR, while co-prescription with a high-dose PPI offers no additional benefit.

Modern achievements in the diagnosis and treatment of the refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Purpose of the review to present up-to-date data on the causes, methods of diagnosis and treatment of the refractory form of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Refractory GERD is the preservation of typical symptoms of the disease and/or incomplete healing of the esophageal mucosa against the background of taking a standard dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) once a day for 8 weeks. The reasons for the lack of response to the treatment are divided into related to the patient, related to therapy, and not related to GERD. Diagnostic approaches include x-ray examination of the esophagus and stomach, endoscopy with biopsy, 24-hour Impedance-pH monitoring, esophageal manometry. Depending on the reasons for the lack of response to the therapy, treatment may include lifestyle changes, doubling the dose of PPI, replacing PPI with another, adding H2-receptor antagonists, prokinetics, antacids, alginates and adsorbents. If conservative treatment is ineffective, it is possible to consider alternative methods, such as surgical treatment. Refractory GERD is a serious clinical problem. The absence of an answer to 8-week therapy with PPI requires a thorough differential diagnosis using additional examination methods. The identification of the causes of refractory to the therapy allows to optimize the approaches to its overcoming and to choose the optimal treatment.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the hybrid scheme for eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM: The aim is to conduct a comprehensive comparative study of the efficacy and safety of the hybrid scheme of eradication therapy (ET) in patients with peptic ulcer of the stomach or duodenum associated with Helicobacter pylori. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and methods. In a prospective, randomized comparative study, 180 patients were divided into three equal groups of 60 people, depending on the prescribed 10-day ET regimen. Group 1 - the standard triple scheme (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin); group 2 - four-component therapy with preparations of bismuth (omeprazole, tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth tricalium dicitrate); group 3 - hybrid scheme (first 5 days: omeprazole and amoxicillin, the next 5 days: omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole). The effectiveness of ET was determined with the help of a breath test a month after the end of therapy. Adverse events were recorded by patients in specially developed diaries. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was carried out using the "cost-effectiveness" method with calculation of the CER coefficient. RESULTS: Results and discussion. The effectiveness of standard triple therapy was 73.3% (ITT), 75.9% (PP); four-component therapy with bismuth preparations - 78.3% (ITT), 82.4% (PP); hybrid scheme - 85% (ITT), 91% (PP). Hybrid therapy proved to be significantly more effective than standard triple therapy with a odds ratio (OR) of 3.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-9.73 (p=0.043, χ2=4.75, p-level=0.029298). The incidence of adverse events with the use of triple, four-component and hybrid ET regimens was 15; 18.3 and 28.3% respectively. The OR of at least one adverse event in patients receiving a hybrid ET regimen compared with triple therapy was 2.24 (95% CI 0.91-5.53, p=0.0823, χ2=3.14, p-level=0.076394), and compared with the four-component therapy - 1.76 (95% CI 0.74-4.17, p=0.2804, χ2=1.68, p-level=0.194924). According to the results of the pharmacoeconomic analysis, the most profitable from an economic point of view was a hybrid ET scheme with a CER of 20.1. CONCLUSION: The conclusion. Hybrid therapy showed the greatest effectiveness in comparison with the triple and four-component ET regimens, however, the incidence of side effects in patients receiving the hybrid ET scheme was higher, although it remained within the acceptable level for use in clinical practice. Pharmacoeconomic analysis also showed the advisability of designating a hybrid ET scheme. The obtained data allow to draw a conclusion about the necessity of further study of the efficiency and safety of the hybrid ET scheme.

Concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether concomitant therapy is superior to bismuth quadruple therapy or 14-day triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection remains poorly understood. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10-day concomitant therapy, 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of H pylori. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited adult patients (aged >20 years) with H pylori infection from nine medical centres in Taiwan. Patients who had at least two positive tests from the rapid urease test, histology, culture, or serology or who had a single positive 13C-urea breath test for gastric cancer screening were eligible for enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either concomitant therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 10 days; bismuth quadruple therapy (bismuth tripotassium dicitrate 300 mg four times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day) for 10 days; or triple therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 14 days. A computer-generated permuted block randomisation sequence with a block size of 6 was used for randomisation, and the sequence was concealed in an opaque envelope until the intervention was assigned. Investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the eradication frequency of H pylori with first-line therapy assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01906879. FINDINGS: Between July 17, 2013, and April 20, 2016, 5454 patients were screened for eligibility. Of these, 1620 patients were randomly assigned in this study. The eradication frequencies were 90·4% (488/540 [95% CI 87·6-92·6]) for 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 85·9% (464/540 [82·7-88·6]) for 10-day concomitant therapy, and 83·7% (452/540 [80·4-86·6]) for 14-day triple therapy in the intention-to-treat analysis. 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy was superior to 14-day triple therapy (difference 6·7% [95% CI 2·7-10·7, p=0·001), but not 10-day concomitant therapy. 10-day concomitant therapy was not superior to 14-day triple therapy. The frequency of adverse events was 67% (358/533) in patients treated with 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 58% (309/535) in patients treated with 10-day concomitant therapy, and 47% (252/535) in patients treated with 14-day triple therapy. INTERPRETATION: Bismuth quadruple therapy is preferable to 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment in the face of rising prevalence of clarithromycin resistance. Concomitant therapy given for 10 days might not be optimum and a longer treatment length should be considered. FUNDING: National Taiwan University Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.