Does immunological remission, defined as disappearance of autoantibodies, occur with current treatment strategies? A long-term follow-up study in rheumatoid arthritis patients who achieved sustained DMARD-free status.

OBJECTIVES: Sustained disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-free status, the sustained absence of synovitis after cessation of DMARD therapy, is infrequent in autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but approximates cure (ie, disappearance of signs and symptoms). It was recently suggested that immunological remission, defined as disappearance of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF), underlies this outcome. Therefore, this long-term observational study determined if autoantibodies disappear in RA patients who achieved sustained DMARD-free remission. METHODS: We studied 95 ACPA-positive and/or RF-positive RA patients who achieved DMARD-free remission after median 4.8 years and kept this status for the remaining follow-up (median 4.2 years). Additionally, 21 autoantibody-positive RA patients with a late flare, defined as recurrence of clinical synovitis after a DMARD-free status of ≥1 year, and 45 autoantibody-positive RA patients who were unable to stop DMARD therapy (during median 10 years) were studied. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 (anti-CCP2) IgG, IgM and RF IgM levels were measured in 587 samples obtained at diagnosis, before and after achieving DMARD-free remission. RESULTS: 13% of anti-CCP2 IgG-positive RA patients had seroreverted when achieving remission. In RA patients with a flare and persistent disease this was 8% and 6%, respectively (p=0.63). For anti-CCP2 IgM and RF IgM, similar results were observed. Evaluating the estimated slope of serially measured levels revealed that RF levels decreased more in patients with than without remission (p<0.001); the course of anti-CCP2 levels was not different (p=0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained DMARD-free status in autoantibody-positive RA was not paralleled by an increased frequency of reversion to autoantibody negativity. This form of immunological remission may therefore not be a treatment target in patients with classified RA.

Therapeutic potential of russelioside B as anti-arthritic agent in Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Caralluma species are traditional edible herbs used in folkloric medicine as antidiabetic, antioxidant, antipyretic, antirheumatic, anti-inflammatory and anthelmintic agents. C. quadrangula was selected in this study to document the traditional use of the genus as anti-rheumatic treatment and the possible mechanisms of action. AIM OF THE STUDY: The higher mortality rates and shorter survival among the patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) led to the increased interest on searching for new treatments for RA. Russelioside B (RB), a major pregnane glycoside found in C. quadrangula, was evaluated as a new anti-rheumatic agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The n-butanol fraction of C. quadrangula was chromatographed on a silica gel column to isolate RB. The adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) model was established in rats by intradermal injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to evaluate its anti-arthritic effect. Ibuprofen was used as a reference drug. Forty rats were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 8): normal (NOR); CFA model (CFA); ibuprofen, 5 mg/kg; RB, 25 mg/kg and RB, 50 mg/kg. The treatments were initiated from day 16 when AIA model was established and continued up to day 40. Serum diagnostic rheumatoid markers, inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress biomarkers, cartilage and bone degeneration enzymes were assessed. RESULTS: RB at 50 mg/kg b. wt., showed significant decreases in the activities of hyaluronidase and ß-glucouronidase enzymes as well significant decreases in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines as nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-κB), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) compared to the CFA group; 11.04 ± 0.61 pg/mg protein, 4.35 ± 0.25 pg/mg protein, 3.32 ± 0.13 pg/mg protein & 2.75 ± 0.14 pg/mg protein for RB, 50 mg/kg b. wt. group vs. 25.33 ± 2.13 pg/mg protein, 25.65 ± 2.1 pg/mg protein, 22.20 ± 1.34 pg/mg protein & 13.27 ± 1.40 pg/mg protein for the arthritic group, respectively. The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was significantly restored to normal values in RB, 50 mg/kg treated rats (4.01 ± 0.09 nmol/mL vs. 3.71 ± 0.27 nmol/mL) and the levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO) reduced by 10-folds of the CFA arthritic group. Bone histomorphometry revealed that RB treatment significantly attenuated the CFA-induced bone loss in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that the anti-arthritic effect of RB was mediated through the reduction of the rheumatoid markers, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant action, inhibition of cartilage and bone degenerative enzymes as well as attenuation of bone loss and osteoclastogenesis.

Preventing progression from arthralgia to arthritis: targeting the right patients.

Early treatment is associated with improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), suggesting that a 'window of opportunity', in which the disease is most susceptible to disease-modifying treatment, exists. Autoantibodies and markers of systemic inflammation can be present long before clinical arthritis, and maturation of the immune response seems to coincide with the development of RA. The pre-arthritis phase associated with symptoms such as as joint pain without clinical arthritis (athralgia) is now hypothesized to fall within the aforementioned window of opportunity. Consequently, disease modulation in this phase might prevent the occurrence of clinically apparent arthritis, which would result in a persistent disease course if untreated. Several ongoing proof-of-concept trials are now testing this hypothesis. This Review highlights the importance of adequate risk prediction for the correct design, execution and interpretation of results of these prevention trials, as well as considerations when translating these findings into clinical practice. The patients' perspectives are discussed, and the accuracy with which RA development can be predicted in patients presenting with arthralgia is evaluated. Currently, the best starting position for preventive studies is proposed to be the inclusion of patients with an increased risk of RA, such as those identified as fulfilling the EULAR definition of 'arthralgia suspicious for progression to RA'.