Solid state, pulsed-wave 355 nm UV laser atherectomy debulking in the treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease: The Pathfinder Registry.

BACKGROUND: Atherectomy is an important option for debulking atherosclerotic plaque from diseased arteries in patients with infrainguinal arterial disease. Laser atherectomy uses a high-powered laser to remove the plaque from the arteries to restore blood flow. AIMS: The Pathfinder multicenter registry was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 355 nm laser atherectomy system in a real-world setting for the treatment of de novo, re-stenotic and in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in infrainguinal arteries of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: The study was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label registry study for patients treated with the 355 nm laser system. Clinical and lesion characteristics, procedural safety and efficacy data, and baseline, 6-, and 12-month outcomes data, including Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), Rutherford class, and Walking Impairment Questionnaires (WIQ), were collected. The primary efficacy endpoint was the achievement of ≤30% final residual stenosis at the index lesion postatherectomy and adjunctive therapy evaluated by an angiographic Core Lab. The primary safety endpoint was the percentage of subjects who did not experience periprocedural major adverse events (PPMAEs) before discharge. RESULTS: One hundred and two subjects with 121 lesions treated with the 355 nm laser device at 10 centers were included in the analysis. Mean age was 68.4 ± 10.21 years, 61.8% of subjects were male, 44.6% had critical limb ischemia (CLI), and 47.3% had tibial lesions. The mean residual stenosis at the end of the procedure was 24.4 ± 15.5 with 69 lesions (69.0%) achieving technical procedural success (<30% stenosis); similar rates were observed for subjects with ISR (25.5 ± 14.9), chronic total occlusion (CTO) (28.1 ± 17.0), and severe calcification (36.5 ± 21.6) lesions. Mean ABI, Rutherford, and WIQ scores were improved at both 6 and 12 months. Ninety-seven of 102 subjects (95.1%) met the primary safety endpoint of not experiencing a PPMAE before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The initial data from the Pathfinder Registry demonstrates the 355 nm laser system is safe and effective in a real-world setting for performing atherectomy in patients with infrainguinal PAD.

Safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial.

Background: This study aimed to assess the peri- and postprocedural outcomes of atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of the common femoral (CFA) and popliteal arteries. Methods: Phoenix atherectomy was used for the treatment of 73 and 53 de novo CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, in 122 consecutive patients. Safety endpoints encompassed perforation and peripheral embolization. Postprocedural endpoints included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and clinical success (an improvement of ⩾ 2 Rutherford category [RC]). In addition, 531 patients treated for popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion without atherectomy were used as a comparator group. Results: Procedural success (residual stenosis < 30% after treatment) was 99.2%. The need for bail-out stenting was 2 (2.7%) and 3 (5.7%) in CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively. Only one (1.4%) embolization occurred in the CFA, which was treated by catheter aspiration. No perforations occurred. After 1.50 (IQR = 1.17-2.20) years, CD-TLR occurred in seven (9.2%) and six (14.6%) patients with CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, whereas clinical success was achieved in 62 (91.2%) and 31 (75.6%), respectively. Patients treated with atherectomy and DCB in the popliteal artery after matching for baseline RC, lesion calcification, length, and the presence of chronic total occlusion, exhibited higher freedom from CD-TLR compared to the nondebulking group (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Atherectomy can be used safely and is associated with low rates of bail-out stenting in CFA and popliteal arteries. CD-TLR and clinical success rates are clinically acceptable. In addition, for the popliteal artery, atherectomy combined with DCB demonstrates lower CD-TLR rates compared to a DCB alone strategy. (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708).

United States Investigational Device Exemption study of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System.

OBJECTIVE: Atherectomy has become commonplace as an adjunct to interventional treatments for peripheral arterial disease, but the procedures have been complicated by risks including distal embolization and arterial perforation. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of a novel atherectomy system to treat femoropopliteal and below-knee peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: The Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System (Rex Medical LP, Conshohocken, Pa) was studied in 121 patients with 148 femoropopliteal and below-knee lesions, enrolled at 17 United States institutions. Technical success was defined when the post-atherectomy angiographic stenosis was ≤50%, as assessed by an independent core laboratory. Major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: Among 148 site-identified target lesions in 121 patients, 21.4% were in the superficial femoral artery, 13.7% involved the popliteal artery, and 67.9% were in tibial arteries; 3.1% involved more than one segment. Technical success was 90.2%, with stenoses decreasing from 73% ± 19% at baseline to 42% ± 14% after atherectomy. Adjunctive treatment after atherectomy included angioplasty with uncoated balloons in 91%, drug-coated balloons in 11%, bare stent deployment in 8%, and drug-eluting stent placement in 3%. Procedural success (<30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 93.7% of target lesions. Complications during the procedure included one target vessel perforation and two distal embolizations; each of which were adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as unrelated to the device and were not visualized angiographically by the core laboratory. Freedom from major adverse events was 97.3% through 30 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency were 81.6%, 87.7%, and 91.6% at 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Revolution Peripheral Atherectomy System was associated with few procedural complications and a high rate of success at the index procedure and through 6 months.

Combination of RotarexⓇS Rotational Atherothrombectomy and Drug-Coated Balloonangioplasty for Femoropopliteal Total In-Stent Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is little information on the optimal treatment for patients with femoropopliteal total in-stent occlusion.The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of drug-coated balloon(DCB) angioplasty after RotarexⓇS rotational atherectomy plus thrombectomy for femoropopliteal total in-stent occlusion at 12 months. METHODS: From June 2016 to April 2019, 36 patients (21 male, mean age 71.1 ± 8.2 years) with femoropopliteal total in-stent occlusion were treated using Rotarex S rotational atherectomy plus thrombectomy in combination with DCB angioplasty and 29 (18 male, meanage68.8 ± 7.2 years) underwent DCB angioplasty alone. Primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates during12 months of follow-up were retrospectively compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in all patients. There were no procedure-related adverse events. The mean lesion length was 26.1 ± 6.5 cm in the combination therapy group and 25.5 ± 6.1 cm in the DCB only group (P = 0.703). The 6-month and 12-month primary patency rates were significantly higher in the combination therapy group (94.4% [standard error, 0.038] and 77.8% [0.069], respectively) than in the DCB only group (72.4% [0.083] and 48.3% [0.093]; P = 0.010). The freedom from TLR rate at 12 months was 86.1% (standard error, 0.060) in the combination therapy group and 62.1% (0.096) in the DCB only group (P = 0.016). Three patients (combination therapy, n = 2; DCB only, n = 1) developed distal embolization and were treated successfully by additional 6-F guiding catheter aspiration. No deaths or amputations occurred in either group during 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Rotarex S rotational atherectomy plus thrombectomyin combination with DCB was safe and effective in patients with femoropopliteal total in-stent occlusion during12 months of follow-up.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of debulking devices for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on current evidence to investigate the efficacy of different debulking devices in the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR). METHODS: We systematically searched for articles reporting treatment of FP-ISR patients in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and retrospective studies were included, and clinical characteristic outcomes were extracted and pooled. The efficacy end points included primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random effects model. For each point, effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies with 743 patients that could be included in this meta-analysis. The overall primary patency at 1 year was 58.3% (95% CI, 44.7%-71.9%), and freedom from TLR at 1 year was 67.0% (95% CI, 60.5%-74.6%). Subgroup analysis showed that the laser debulking + percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group was associated with a similar primary patency and freedom from TLR compared with the mechanical debulking + PTA group (53.8% vs 52.8; 65.4% vs 62.1%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the long lesion and short lesion groups and the occlusive and stenosis groups shared similar results of primary patency and freedom from TLR. Laser + drug-coated balloon was associated with higher primary patency and freedom from TLR compared with laser + PTA (78.5% vs 58.3%; 76.7% vs 66.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Debulking devices show promising and favorable results for FP-ISR patients with complex lesions. Debulking devices combined with a drug-coated balloon might be an efficacious way to treat FP-ISR complex lesions in the future.

Three-Year Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy for the Endovascular Treatment of Infrainguinal Claudication or Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Purpose: To investigate the outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) manifesting as claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Materials and Methods: The database from the LIBERTY study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01855412) was interrogated to identify 503 PAD patients treated with any commercially available endovascular devices and adjunctive OA for 617 femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal lesions. Cox regression analyses were employed to examine the association between baseline Rutherford category (RC) stratified as RC 2-3 (n=214), RC 4-5 (n=233), or RC 6 (n=56) and all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major amputation, major adverse event (MAE), and major amputation/death at up to 3 years of follow-up. The mean lesion lengths were 78.7±73.7, 131.4±119.0, and 95.2±83.9 mm, respectively, for the 3 groups. Results: After OA, balloon angioplasty was used in >98% of cases, with bailout stenting necessary in 2.0%, 2.8%, and 0% of the RC groups, respectively. A small proportion (10.8%) of patients developed angiographic complications, without differences based on presentation. During the 3-year follow-up, claudicants were at lower risk for MAE, death, and major amputation/death than patients with CLTI. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 84.6% for the RC 2-3 group, 76.2% for the RC 4-5 group, and 63.7% for the RC 6 group. The 3-year freedom from major amputation was estimated as 100%, 95.3%, and 88.6%, respectively. Among CLTI patients only, the RC at baseline was correlated with the combined outcome of major amputation/death, whereas RC classification did not affect TVR, MAE, major amputation, or death rates. Conclusion: Peripheral artery angioplasty with adjunctive OA in patients with CLTI or claudication is safe and associated with low major amputation rates after 3 years of follow-up. These results demonstrate the utility of OA for patients across the spectrum of PAD.

Optimal Vessel Sizing and Understanding Dissections in Infrapopliteal Interventions: Data From the iDissection Below the Knee Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate if imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) yields a more accurate estimate of vessel diameter and the presence of dissections than angiography after intervention in the infrapopliteal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-center study enrolled 20 consecutive patients (mean age 74.1±12.4 years; 12 women) with infrapopliteal disease who were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n=10) or orbital atherectomy (OA) followed by PTA (n=10). The majority of patients were hypertensive and half were diabetic. The overall lesion length was 7.3±6.3 cm, and the diameter stenosis was 80.3%±22.1%. The baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Vessel diameters were measured using IVUS from the internal elastic lamina (IEL) to the IEL. IVUS was performed at baseline, post PTA or OA, and post OA+PTA. Quantitative vascular angiography (QVA) and IVUS were analyzed by a core laboratory. Dissections on cine images were categorized based on the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification, while the arc and depth were used to characterize dissections on IVUS images. RESULTS: Mean vessel diameter by QVA was 2.9±0.6 vs 4.0±1.0 mm by IVUS according to the core laboratory (mean difference 1.1±0.9, p<0.001). On angiography, there were 7 dissections after PTA (6 C, 1 D), 1 dissection after OA (1 B), and 2 dissections after OA+PTA (1 A, 1 B; p=0.028 vs post PTA). IVUS uncovered 3.8 times more dissections than seen on angiography. There were 23 dissections after PTA (18 intima, 3 media, 2 adventitia), 12 dissections after OA (8 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia), and 11 dissections following OA+PTA (7 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia; p=0.425 vs PTA). Bailout stenting (all due to angiographic dissections ≥C) was necessary in 6 of the PTA cohort and none of the OA+PTA group. CONCLUSION: In addition to underestimating the infrapopliteal vessel diameter by ~25%, angiography underappreciated the presence and severity of post-intervention dissections vs IVUS, particularly in the OA+PTA group.

Clinical Impact and Predictors of the Slow-Flow Phenomenon after Endovascular Treatment of Infrapopliteal Lesions Using the Crosser Catheter in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical impact and predictors of slow flow after endovascular treatment (EVT) using the Crosser catheter for debulking infrapopliteal lesions associated with critical limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 65 patients with critical limb ischemia (70 limbs, 90 infrapopliteal lesions), who underwent EVT using the Crosser catheter between November 2011 and February 2017. The Crosser catheter was used when the balloon catheter could not be passed through the lesion or could not be dilated sufficiently. Slow flow was evaluated after atherectomy using Crosser and was defined as delayed antegrade flow to the foot (total number of cine frames >35). RESULTS: Following atherectomy, slow flow developed in 37 infrapopliteal lesions (41.1%). Despite secondary treatment, slow flow persisted in 29 of 37 lesions (78%). After atherectomy using the Crosser catheter, the balloon could be passed through the lesion in all cases. The wound healing rate at 1 year after EVT (overall, 67.8%) was significantly poorer in the presence of slow flow (rate with vs. without slow flow, 45.3% vs. 84.4%, respectively; P = .006), especially among patients with stage ≥3 baseline wound, ischemia, and foot infection. The active length of the Crosser catheter was a predictor of slow flow (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.08; P < .001), with an optimal cutoff of 100 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Slow flow is associated with a poorer wound healing rate at 1 year, especially for patients with severe baseline ischemia. To reduce the risk of slow flow, the active length of the Crosser catheter should be kept at <100 mm.

Jetstream Atherectomy System for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Single Center Experience and Mid-term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess our experience and mid-term outcomes using Jetstream atherectomy system for treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD). METHODS: Data of 30 patients with FPAD treated at our center between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed. Two subgroups of patients were identified: Group A included patients (n = 18) with de novo lesions; Group B (n = 12) included those with in-stent restenosis. The primary study end points assessed were technical success, perioperative mortality, and major adverse event (MAE) rate at 30 days (distal embolization, major amputation, and target lesion revascularization). Other outcomes measured were survival, primary, and secondary patency, and freedom from amputation at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Technical success was 100% for both groups. The MAE rate was 8.7%. No distal filter was adopted during intervention. Angioplasty was associated with 93.3% of cases (93.3% vs. 100%; P = 0.15), drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in 12 cases (22.2% vs. 66.6%; P = 0.008), drug-eluting stent and bare metal implantation in 1 (5.6% vs. 0%; P = 1) and 4 cases (11.1% vs. 16.7%; P = 1), respectively. The cumulative primary and secondary patency rates were 75.1% and 95.5% at 1 year, and 70.4% and 84.8% at 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The survival and freedom from amputation were 96.4% and 85.8% at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The freedom from target lesion revascularization was 91.7% and 83.4% at 1 and 3 years from intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Jetstream appears to be safe and feasible with no distal embolization and low rate perioperative complications. Moreover, encouraging outcomes were observed when atherectomy was associated to DEB angioplasty.

Novel laser-based catheter for peripheral atherectomy: 6-month results from the Eximo Medical B-Laser™ IDE study.

BACKGROUND: The B-Laser™ atherectomy system (Eximo Medical, Israel) is a 355 nm solid-state Nd:YAG short pulse laser for de-novo and restenotic infrainguinal PAD with enhanced affinity for atheroma and calcified plaque. METHODS: The study was a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international, open-label study assessing the B-Laser™ in symptomatic (Rutherford 2 to 4) infrainguinal peripheral artery disease. Primary core lab efficacy was mean reduction in diameter stenosis >20% by the B-Laser™ catheter alone. Cardiovascular death, major amputation, target lesion revascularization, WIQ, ABI and Rutherford class were obtained at baseline and out to 6 months. Duplex ultrasound patency (PSVR <2.5), was evaluated by Core Lab. RESULTS: 97 (77 in USA) PAD subjects (51 male, mean 70.5 years [range 46-86]) with 107 lesions were treated with B-Laser™ (average length 5.4 cm [range 1-24], 29.0% infrapopliteal. 77.6% calcification [26.2% severe], 21.5% chronic total occlusions, 20.6% re-stenotic). Average reduction in residual stenosis post B-Laser™ alone was 33.6 ± 14.2%. Baseline and final stenosis (post laser and adjunctive therapy) were 85.7 ± 12.2% and 17.7 ± 11.0%, respectively. Duplex patency was 96.8% at 30-days and 85.6% at 6 months (95.7% 6-month patency with severe calcification), and did not differ between POBA vs. DCB sub-groups. ABI, Rutherford category and WIQ all improved. There was one MAE and three TLRs out of 101 lesions. No procedural distal embolization was noted and there were no major device-related dissections. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with the B-Laser™ atherectomy system in infrainguinal PAD procedures demonstrates a high level of safety and efficacy for denovo and restenotic infrainguinal arterial lesions.

Guidewire fracture during orbital atherectomy for peripheral artery disease: Insights from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Orbital atherectomy (OA) is routinely being used for plaque modification to facilitate percutaneous revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and arterial calcification. Guidewire fracture (GWF) during OA, though anecdotally described, has not been studied in a systematic manner. We conducted a review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to study the reports of wire fracture and its management and consequences. METHODS: We queried the MAUDE database for all events involving the current generation of the OA device: "Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System", and "Stealth 360° Orbital PAD System". RESULTS: We identified 62 reports of GWF during OA for PAD. The superficial femoral artery was the most commonly involved atherectomy site. The wire fractured at the soft tip in a majority of cases (68%). Embolized wire fragments were left in the patient in 36 cases (58%), retrieved percutaneously in 10 cases (16%), and trapped by a stent against the arterial wall in eight cases (13%). Lastly, eight patients (13%) underwent surgery for removal of the wire fragment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published report to study the complication of GWF during peripheral OA. GWF is an uncommon but has significant procedural and clinical consequences. It results in a high rate of ancillary rescue procedures (including surgery) and is associated with a higher risk of arterial thrombosis and complications from wire retrieval attempts. The risk of wire fracture may be avoided with carefully adherence to the IFU.

Percutaneous endovascular tissue sampling of endoluminal tumors using directional atherectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate technical feasibility and safety of endovascular tumor specimen sampling using an escalating endovascular biopsy strategy using a directional atherectomy device compared with forceps biopsy and catheter aspiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2017, a cohort of ten consecutive patients (6 male; median age 56, range 39-73 years) was referred for sampling of endovascular masses. Localizations included the abdominal aorta (n = 4), left brachiocephalic vein (n = 2), inferior vena cava (n = 1), and left pulmonary artery (n = 3). For each individual mass, all three endovascular tissue sampling approaches were applied including catheter-based aspiration, straight two-jaw biopsy forceps, and directional atherectomy during a single session. RESULTS: Aspiration and forceps biopsy did not provide sufficient material for histological analyses. In contrast, technical success for endovascular tumor sampling using directional atherectomy was 100%. After two atherectomy passages, sufficient material was available for each vessel region allowing histologic diagnosis, which revealed sarcoma and chronic inflammation for masses in the aorta, angiosarcoma for brachiocephalic vein, hepatocellular carcinoma for inferior vena cava, and angiosarcoma for pulmonary artery. In case of a histologically benign diagnosis, no malignant tumor proliferation was obvious on follow-up imaging studies after 3 months and 1 year. Thus, the rate of false-negative results was considered 0%. No procedure-associated complications, e.g., vessel perforation, were recorded. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results in a limited number of patients proved directional atherectomy beneficial as a safe and feasible technique for endoluminal tissue sampling of vascular masses. Additional large-scale studies are necessary and worthy for further evaluation in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Endovascular masses pose a challenge to appropriate clinical management. • Off-label directional atherectomy proved to be a safe and feasible technique for endoluminal tissue sampling of vascular masses. Furthermore, directional atherectomy was superior to aspiration or forceps biopsy in our small study cohort. • Directional atherectomy may represent the last or only option for tissue probing as a prerequisite for further treatment decisions.

Hybrid atherectomy for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of directional atherectomy with a Phoenix atherectomy system in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of subjects who had undergone atherectomy for severe and occluded LE-PAD. Demographic data, procedural properties, and follow-up information were recorded. The technical, procedural and clinical successes were reported. RESULTS: In total, 120 subjects were evaluated. The superficial femoral artery (SFA) group consisted of 64 subjects (53.3%), and the popliteal group consisted of 56 (46.7%) subjects. Groups did not differ in terms of age, gender, comorbid diseases and tobacco use. In both groups, four subjects (6.3% of SFA and 7.1% of the popliteal group) experienced extravasation was encountered in from the vessel during the procedure. During atherectomy, two (3.3%) of the subjects in the SFA group and one (1.9%) subject in the popliteal group experienced vessel dissection. Acute technical success in this study was 96.7% for SFA and 98.1% for the popliteal group. Overall technical success was 97.7%. In the first 72 h, three (5%) of the subjects in the SFA group and four (7.7%) of the subjects in the popliteal group experienced major adverse events. Acute procedural success in this study was 91.7% for SFA and 90.4% for the popliteal group. Overall procedural success was 91.1%. Success was defined as an improvement of at least one grade in the Rutherford classification; two (3.3%) subjects did not demonstrate improvements in the SFA group, and the clinical success rate was 96.7%. All subjects in the popliteal group demonstrated an improvement of at least one grade in the Rutherford classification, and clinical success was 100%. When the groups combined all subjects, the clinical success in this study was 98.2%. CONCLUSION: Directional atherectomy with a Phoenix atherectomy system demonstrated comparable results with the literature.

One-Year Outcomes Following Directional Atherectomy of Popliteal Artery Lesions: Subgroup Analysis of the Prospective, Multicenter DEFINITIVE LE Trial.

PURPOSE: To report the effectiveness of directional atherectomy for the treatment of popliteal artery occlusive disease. METHODS: This subset of the prospective, multicenter, single-arm DEFINITIVE LE trial included 158 patients (mean age 72.0±10.9 years; 82 men) who underwent directional atherectomy in 162 popliteal artery lesions between 2009 and 2011. Forty-eight (30.4%) patients were suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). The mean lesion length was 5.8±3.9 cm; 38 (23.5%) arteries were occluded. The primary outcome measure for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) was duplex ultrasound-defined primary patency at 1 year; the outcome for subjects with CLI was freedom from major amputation of the target limb at 1 year. Outcomes and adverse events were independently assessed. RESULTS: Procedure success (≤30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 84.4% of treated lesions; adjunctive stenting was required in 6 (3.7%) of the 162 lesions. The 1-year primary patency rate was 75.0% (IC patients 78.2% and CLI patients 67.5%, p=0.118). The freedom from major amputation in both cohorts was 100%. In both IC and CLI patients, significant improvements were demonstrated at 1 year in the Rutherford category, walking distance, and quality of life in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that directional atherectomy in popliteal arteries leads to favorable technical and clinical results at 1 year for claudicant as well as CLI patients.

Lower Extremity Revascularization Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Directional Atherectomy: Final Results of the EValuatIon of the PantheriS OptIcal COherence Tomography ImagiNg Atherectomy System for Use in the Peripheral Vasculature (VISION) Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided atherectomy catheter in treating patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: The VISION trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01937351) was a single-arm, multicenter, global investigational device exemption study enrolling 158 subjects (mean age 67.2±10.5 years; 87 men) across 20 participating sites. In this cohort, 198 lesions were treated with an average length of 53±40 mm using the Pantheris catheter alone or Pantheris + adjunctive therapy. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major adverse events (MAEs) through 6 months (objective performance goal 43.2%). Technical success (primary efficacy outcome) was defined as the percent of target lesions with a residual diameter stenosis ≤50% after treatment with the Pantheris device alone (objective performance goal 87.0%). Procedural success was defined as reduction in stenosis to ≤30% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy. Tissue specimens retrieved from each treated lesion were histologically analyzed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of OCT image guidance. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome was achieved in 192 (97.0%) of the 198 lesions treated with the Pantheris catheter. Across all lesions, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 78.7%±15.1% at baseline to 30.3%±11.8% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001) and to 22.4%±9.9% after Pantheris ± adjunctive therapy (p<0.001). Of the 198 target lesions, 104 (52.5%) were treated with the Pantheris alone, 84 (42.4%) were treated with Pantheris + adjunctive angioplasty, and 10 (5.1%) with Pantheris + angioplasty + stenting. The composite MAE outcome through 6 months occurred in 25 (16.6%) of 151 subjects. There were no clinically significant perforations, 1 (0.5%) catheter-related dissection, 4 (2%) embolic events, and a 6.4% clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate at 6 months. The 40-lesion chronic total occlusion (CTO) subset (mean lesion length 82±38 mm) achieved a similar significant reduction in stenosis to 35.5%±13.6% after Pantheris alone (p<0.001). Histological analysis of atherectomy specimens confirmed <1% adventitia in 82.1% of the samples, highlighting the precision of OCT guidance. Characterization of the OCT-guided lesions revealed evidence of an underestimation of disease burden when using fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: OCT-guided atherectomy for femoropopliteal disease is safe and effective. Additionally, the precision afforded by OCT guidance leads to greater removal of plaque during atherectomy while sparing the adventitia.

Laser Atherectomy for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical results of laser atherectomy in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients underwent laser atherectomy at a single institution during a 7-year period by vascular surgeons and interventional cardiologists in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Clinical data were retrieved from patient charts and hospital electronic medical records along with the associated arteriograms. RESULTS: A total of 461 lesions in 343 limbs were treated in 300 patients with a mean age of 70 years. The indication was critical limb ischemia (CLI) with rest pain or tissue loss in 227 (66%) of interventions and claudication in 116 (34%). All procedures included an associated balloon angioplasty, while stenting was performed in 33%. Technical success was achieved in 99% with only 2 (<1%) cases with an acute procedure-related complication requiring surgical intervention. At a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 1-87 months; median 24 months), 156 patients (45%) became asymptomatic or achieved significant clinical improvement (resolution of tissue loss or rest pain), 60 (17%) remained with CLI, 30 (9%) had a major proximal amputation, and 18 (5%) had a minor amputation. Freedom from major amputation was 90% at 5 years by life-table analysis. Univariate statistical analysis demonstrated the risk of a major amputation to be associated with diabetes, hemodialysis, and tissue loss (P < 0.05 to P < 0.005), while multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated diabetes to be overwhelmingly important (RR: 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-21.3; P < 0.05). In a similar manner, multivariate analysis indicated dialysis (RR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.01-5.98; P < 0.05) and CLI (RR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.42-3.65; P < 0.01) were associated with higher likelihood for lack of clinical improvement. There was no difference in major amputation rates between surgeons and interventional cardiologists (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.7-2.1; P < 0.1) although it was 3 times more likely for the patients treated by surgeons to suffer from CLI (odds ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.9-5.4; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Laser atherectomy is a safe and useful adjunct in limb salvage. Diabetics have much higher probability of requiring a proximal amputation, while those on dialysis and with CLI are least likely to gain clinical benefit.

Safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy System in lower extremity arteries: Early and midterm outcomes from the prospective multicenter EASE study.

Objectives To evaluate the novel Phoenix Atherectomy System as percutaneous treatment of de novo and restenotic infrainguinal arterial lesions. Methods This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized investigational device exemption trial was conducted across 16 US and German centers between August 2010 and April 2013. Intention-to-treat enrollment was 128 patients (mean age: 71.8 years, 59% male) with 149 lesions (mean length: 34 mm, mean diameter stenosis: 89.5%), and the primary analysis per-protocol population consisted of 105 patients with 123 lesions. The primary efficacy endpoint, technical success, was the achievement of acute debulking with a post-atherectomy residual diameter stenosis ≤50% (before adjunctive therapy). The primary safety endpoint was the major adverse event (MAE) rate through 30 days. Results For the primary analysis per-protocol population, the rate of lesion technical success was 95.1% (117/123), with the lower limit of the 95% CI 90.6%, meeting the prospectively established target performance goal of ≥86%. After post-atherectomy adjunctive therapy, residual stenosis was ≤30% for 99.2% (122/123) of lesions (mean final diameter stenosis 10.5%). Improvement of ≥1 Rutherford class occurred for 74.5% of patients through 30 days and for 80% through six months. MAEs were experienced by 5.7% (6/105) of patients through 30 days (with the upper limit of the 95% CI 11.0%, meeting the target performance goal of <20%), and 16.8% through six months. Six-month freedom from TLR and TVR was 88.0% and 86.1%, respectively. Conclusions Based on the high rate of technical success and the low rates of MAEs through six months, the Phoenix Atherectomy System is safe and effective for the debulking of lower-extremity arterial lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01541774.

Two Blades-Up Runs Using the JetStream Navitus Atherectomy Device Achieve Optimal Tissue Debulking of Nonocclusive In-Stent Restenosis: Observations From a Porcine Stent/Balloon Injury Model.

PURPOSE: To determine the number of runs with blades up (BU) using the JetStream Navitus to achieving optimal debulking in a porcine model of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: In this porcine model, 8 limbs were implanted with overlapping nitinol self-expanding stents. ISR was treated initially with 2 blades-down (BD) runs followed by 4 BU runs (BU1 to BU4). Quantitative vascular angiography (QVA) was performed at baseline, after 2 BD runs, and after each BU run. Plaque surface area and percent stenosis within the treated stented segment were measured. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to measure minimum lumen area (MLA) and determine IVUS-derived plaque surface area. RESULTS: QVA showed that plaque surface area was significantly reduced between baseline (83.9%±14.8%) and 2 BD (67.7%±17.0%, p=0.005) and BU1 (55.4%±9.0%, p=0.005) runs, and between BU1 and BU2 runs (50.7%±9.7%, p<0.05). Percent stenosis behaved similarly with no further reduction after BU2. There were no further reductions in plaque surface area or percent stenosis with BU 3 and 4 runs (p=0.10). Similarly, IVUS (24 lesions) confirmed optimal results with BU2 runs and no additional gain in MLA or reduction in plaque surface area with BU3 and 4. IVUS confirmed no orbital cutting with JetStream Navitus. There were no stent strut discontinuities on high-resolution radiographs following atherectomy. CONCLUSION: JetStream Navitus achieved optimal tissue debulking after 2 BD and 2 BU runs with no further statistical gain in debulking after the BU2 run. Operators treating ISR with JetStream Navitus may be advised to limit their debulking to 2 BD and 2 BU runs to achieve optimal debulking.

Number of Blades-up Runs Using JetStream XC Atherectomy for Optimal Tissue Debulking in Patients with Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis.

Rotational atherectomy with the use of the JetStream XC device is indicated for treatment of infrainguinal arterial obstructive disease. The number of blades-up (BU) runs needed for optimal tissue debulking in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) is unknown. In the present series, 6 patients (15 lesions) were treated for femoropopliteal ISR with the JetStream XC device. Minimal luminal diameter or percent stenosis improved significantly from baseline after 2 BU runs, but no further gain was seen between 2 and 4 BU runs (P > .05). However, adjunctive balloon angioplasty reduced percent stenosis significantly following BU runs. In conclusion, the JetStream XC device achieved optimal acute angiographic results in treating femoropopliteal ISR following 2 BU runs and adjunctive balloon angioplasty.

[Remote results of endovascular atherectomy with the SilverHawk device].

The authors studied the remote results of 27 endovascular catheter atherectomies performed in 25 patients. All patients had lesions of arteries of the femoropopliteal segment according to the TASC II classification. The duration of follow up varied from 6 to 34 months. Endovascular catheter atherectomy was carried out by means of the SilverHawk EV3 system with protection of the distal bed from embolism using Spider EV3. Our findings prove that catheter atherectomy with the SilverHawk system is most efficient it treatment of short stenotic lesions, lesions localizing in the zone of increased dynamic activity, multi-level lesions of arteries of the femoropopliteal segment, as well as short lesions in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus.