Quality Control of Busulfan Plasma Quantitation, Modeling, and Dosing: An Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program.

BACKGROUND: Personalizing busulfan doses to target a narrow plasma exposure has improved the efficacy and lowered the toxicity of busulfan-based conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic cell transplant. Regional regulations guide interlaboratory proficiency testing for busulfan concentration quantification and monitoring. To date, there have been no comparisons of the busulfan pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendation protocols used in these laboratories. Here, in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, a novel interlaboratory proficiency program for the quantitation in plasma, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing of busulfan was designed. The methods and results of the first 2 rounds of this proficiency testing are described herein. METHODS: A novel method was developed to stabilize busulfan in N,N-dimethylacetamide, which allowed shipping of the proficiency samples without dry ice. In each round, participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (one low and one high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. All participants were blinded to the answers; descriptive statistics were used to evaluate their overall performance. The guidelines suggested that answers within ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure and dose recommendation were to be considered accurate. RESULTS: Of the 4 proficiency samples evaluated, between 67% and 85% of the busulfan quantitation results were accurate (ie, within 85%-115% of the reference value). The majority (88% round #1; 71% round #2) of the dose recommendation answers were correct. CONCLUSIONS: A proficiency testing program by which laboratories are alerted to inaccuracies in their quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations for busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients was developed. These rounds of proficiency testing suggests that additional educational efforts and proficiency rounds are needed to ensure appropriate busulfan dosing.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of intravenous busulfan in Thai children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A pilot study.

Busulfan (Bu) is commonly used in myeloablative conditioning regimens for children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The standard target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of Bu is approximately 900-1500 µM min. In previous studies using five fixed doses (0.8-1.2 mg/kg) for Bu without dose adjustment, 75% patients achieved the target AUC. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the percentage of target AUC for intravenous (IV) Bu in Thai children. IV Bu was administered every 6 h over 16 doses. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis after the first, ninth, and thirteenth doses of Bu. Seven patients (2-14 years; median 6 years) were diagnosed with thalassemia (n = 4), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 2), and pure red cell aplasia. Three, two, and two patients received Bu at 1.1, 1.2, and 0.8 mg/kg, respectively. The AUC of Bu varied from 292-1714 µM min (median = 804). Nine (42.86%), eleven (52.38%), and one (4.76%) AUC values were within, below, and above the target, respectively. The median (range) Bu clearance was 5.93 (1.91-14.65) mL/min/kg. In this study, 42.86% AUC value achieved the target, which was lower than that in previous studies. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu should be considered in Thai children receiving five fixed doses of IV Bu, and dose adjustment should be performed as necessary. Further PK studies for Bu with a larger sample size are warranted for confirming the necessity of TDM in every step dose of Bu.(Trial registration numbers; TCTR20190528003).

Comparing Dried Blood Spots and Plasma Concentrations for Busulfan Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is one of the conditioning regimen components for pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bu therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for a successful treatment outcome and toxicity evasion. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a rapid and simple method for Bu TDM, compared with conventional plasma sampling. This study evaluated the feasibility of using the DBS method for Bu TDM. The hematocrit (Hct) and conditioning day were also examined for their impact on the DBS method's performance. METHODS: Venous blood collected from 6 healthy volunteers was diluted, using their plasma into 4 samples of varying Hct values. Each sample was spiked with Bu calibrators (300, 600, and 1400 ng/mL), prepared using DBS and dried plasma spot (DPS) sampling and analyzed using a validated liquid-chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry method. Clinical blood samples (n = 153) from pediatric patients (n = 15) treated with Bu (mainly from doses 1, 2, 5, and 9) were used to prepare paired volumetric DBS and DPS samples. A Bland-Altman plot and Deming regression were used to define the agreement between the paired DBS and DPS measurements. Passing-Bablok regression analyses investigated the effects of Hct and conditioning day on the linearity between both methods. RESULTS: In vitro analyses showed good agreement between DBS and DPS measurements, with a mean difference of -5.4% and a 95% confidence interval on the limits of agreement of -15.3% to 4.6%. Clinical samples showed good correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.96; slope = 1.00) between the DBS and DPS methods. The DBS method met the clinical acceptance limits for clinical samples, with a bias <±20%. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement, with only 5.8% of paired measurements exceeding the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), although within its 95% confidence interval. Hct observations ranged from 21.7% to 34.7% and did not affect Bu concentrations measured from DBS in either the in vitro or in vivo studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that DBS is a useful method for Bu TDM, provided samples are analyzed on the collection day. DBS sampling offers advantages over traditional plasma sampling in infants and younger children because only small volumes of blood are required.

Limited Sampling Strategies Supporting Individualized Dose Adjustment of Intravenous Busulfan in Children and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for busulfan supports dose adjustment during conditioning for stem cell transplantation. The authors aimed to develop and validate limited sampling strategies (LSS) of 4-5 samples for a precise estimation of the area under concentration (AUC)-time curve of busulfan, in plasma as an alternative to an intensive sampling strategy (ISS) requiring 9-10 samples. METHODS: ISS TDM data from 297 patients (≤18 years of age) were used. AUCLSS was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and multiple linear regression (MLR). Unlike more complex modeling methods, MLR does not require sophisticated software or advanced training of personnel. MLR coefficients were estimated in the development subset containing randomly selected 50% of the records and were then used to calculate the AUCLSS of the remaining records (the validation subset). The agreement between dose adjustment recommendations (DAR) based on ISS and LSS, in the validation subset, was evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis. A DAR deviating from an ISS-based reference by <15% was deemed acceptable. RESULTS: Twelve LSSs were acceptable. Sampling at 0, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the start of the second infusion (LSS15) yielded the best performance, with DAR deviating from the reference by <10% for 95% of cases; the AUCLSS was determined as follows: AUCLSS = 74.7954 × C(0) + 81.8948 × C(120) + 38.1771 × C(180) + 138.1404 × C(240) + 54.1837. This LSS and LSS13 performed similarly well in an independent external validation. CONCLUSIONS: MLR-based estimates of AUCLSS provide DARs that deviate minimally from the reference. LSSs allow the reduction of patient discomfort, a ∼50% reduction of TDM-related workload for nursing staff and blood loss and a ∼25% reduction in laboratory workload. These benefits may encourage wider use of busulfan TDM, supporting safe and efficacious personalized dosing.

A rapid HPLC-MS/MS method for determining busulfan in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative detection of busulfan (BU) in children's hemolytic samples by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was established. In this study, the sample preparation procedure involved a one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile (ACN) solution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method used Hypersil GOLD C18 . The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) and ACN with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring modes were used for quantitative analysis and the ion pairs of BU and BU-d8 were m/z 263.9 → 150.9 and 272.0 → 159.0, respectively. BU had a good linearity in the range of 0.01-10 µg mL-1 . The intra- and inter-day relative error was between -7.21% and 8.26%, and the coefficient of variation was less than 12.64%. The average extraction recovery rate in plasma samples was 99.76% ± 6.53%, and the matrix in normal plasma and hemolyzed plasma had no significant effect on the detection results. Normal and hemolytic samples could maintain good stability at 4, 25 and -40°C. As a result, this method is particularly suitable for determining BU in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and this study provides the methodological basis for further research on the pharmacokinetics of BU in children with HSCT.

Raman spectroscopy as a potential tool for label free therapeutic drug monitoring in human serum: the case of busulfan and methotrexate.

A methodology is proposed, based on Raman spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis, to determine the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for therapeutic drug monitoring in human serum, using the examples of Busulfan, a cell cycle non-specific alkylating antineoplastic agent, and, Methotrexate, a chemotherapeutic agent and immune system suppressant. In this study, ultrafiltration is employed to fractionate spiked human pooled serum to efficiently recover the drug in the filtrate prior to performing Raman analysis. The drug concentration ranges were chosen to encompass the recommended therapeutic ranges and toxic levels in patients. Raman spectra were collected from the filtrates in the liquid form, using an inverted backscattering microscopic geometry, using 532 nm as source. Finally, prediction models were built by using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and LOD and LOQ were calculated directly from the linear prediction models. The LOD calculated for Busulfan is 0.0002 ± 0.0001 mg mL-1, 30-40 times lower than the level of toxicity, enabling the application of this method in target dose adjustment of Busulfan for patients undergoing, for example, bone marrow transplantation. The LOD and LOQ calculated for Methotrexate are 7.8 ± 5 µM and 26 ± 5 µM, respectively, potentially enabling high dose monitoring. The promising results obtained from this study suggest the potential of Raman spectroscopy for therapeutic drug monitoring of drugs in bodily fluids.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Busulfan for the Management of Pediatric Patients: Cross-Validation of Methods and Long-Term Performance.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent used as part of the conditioning regimen in pediatric patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite intravenous (IV) administration and dosing recommendations based on age and weight, reports have revealed interindividual variability in Bu pharmacokinetics and the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this context, adjusting doses to Bu's narrow therapeutic window is advised. We aimed to assess the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu in children, the reliability of Bu quantification methods, and its stability in plasma when stored for up to 5 years. METHODS: Eighteen patients from our TDM center (252 samples) were included. All of them received a 2-hour Bu IV infusion 4 times daily for a total of 16 doses. The first dose of Bu was age/weight-based, and the subsequent doses were adjusted from third or fifth dose onward based on the estimated first dose pharmacokinetic parameters to target steady-state concentrations (Css) of 600-900 ng/mL. The performance of our unit's high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method was assessed using a quality control (QC, 35 series) chart. International, multicenter, cross-validation test (n = 21) was conducted to validate different analytical methods. To assess Bu stability, regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots were performed on measurements at repeated time points on samples stored at -80°C for up to 5 years. RESULTS: We observed a 4.2-fold interindividual variability in Bu Css after the first dose, with only 28% of children having a Css within the target range. During the 4 days of conditioning, 83% of children had their doses modified according to TDM recommendations. This achieved a Css within the target range in 75% of the children. Routine QC measurements were generally within the ±15% range around theoretical values, showing the optimal robustness of our center's analytical method. Two of the 21 Bu TDM centers returned inadequate results during cross-validation testing; both used a UV detection method. Storage at -80°C led to a fall in Bu content of 14.9% ± 13.4% at 2-4 years and of 20% ± 5% by 5 years (roverall = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that TDM is an effective method of achieving targeted Bu levels in children. QC programs are crucial to monitoring and maintaining the quality of an analytical method.

Population pharmacokinetics of treosulfan and development of a limited sampling strategy in children prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: There is an increasing interest in use of treosulfan (TREO), a structural analogue of busulfan, as an agent in conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both in pediatric and adult populations. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to establish limited sampling strategies (LSSs) enabling accurate estimation of exposure to this drug. METHODS: The study included 15 pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases, undergoing conditioning regimens prior to HSCT including TREO administered as a 1 h or 2 h infusion at daily doses of 10, 12, or 14 g/m2. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by means of non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach in Monolix® software. Multivariate regression analysis and Bayesian method were used to develop 2- and 3-point strategies for estimation of exposure to TREO. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of TREO was best described with a two-compartmental linear model with proportional residual error. Following sampling schedules allowed accurate estimation of exposure to TREO: 1 h and 6 h or 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h for a TREO dose 12 g/m2 in a 1 h infusion, or at 2 h and 6 h or 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h for a TREO dose of 12 g/m2 and 14 g/m2 in a 2 h infusion. CONCLUSIONS: A two-compartmental population pharmacokinetic model of TREO was developed and successfully used to establish 2- and 3-point LSSs for accurate and precise estimation of TREO AUC0→∞.

High interpatient variability of treosulfan exposure is associated with early toxicity in paediatric HSCT: a prospective multicentre study.

Treosulfan-based conditioning is increasingly employed in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Data on treosulfan pharmacokinetics in children are scarce, and the relationship between treosulfan exposure, toxicity and clinical outcome is unresolved. In this multicentre prospective observational study, we studied treosulfan pharmacokinetics and the drug's relationship with regimen-related toxicity and early clinical outcome in 77 paediatric patients. Treosulfan dose was 30 g/m2 , administered over 3 consecutive days in infants <1 year old (n = 12) and 42 g/m2 in children ≥1 year old (n = 65). Mean day 1 treosulfan exposure was 1744 ± 795 mg*h/l (10 g/m2 ) and 1561 ± 511 mg*h/l (14 g/m2 ), with an inter-individual variability of 56 and 33% in the respective groups. High treosulfan exposure (>1650 mg*h/l) was associated with an increased risk of mucosal [Odds ratio (OR) 4·40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·19-16·28, P = 0·026] and skin toxicity (OR 4·51; 95% CI 1·07-18·93, P = 0·040). No correlation was found between treosulfan exposure and the early clinical outcome parameters: engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease and donor chimerism. Our study provides the first evidence in a large cohort of paediatric patients of high variability in treosulfan pharmacokinetics and an association between treosulfan exposure and early toxicity. Ongoing studies will reveal whether treosulfan exposure is related to long-term disease-specific outcome and late treatment-related toxicity.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis of intravenous busulfan in Chinese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

There are several reports describing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of busulfan (BU). However, limited information is available in Chinese hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. The present study aimed to establish a popPK model of intravenous BU in Chinese HSCT patients for individualized drug therapy. The popPK model of BU was developed from a total of 284 concentration-time points from 53 patients. The effects of demographic and biochemical covariates were investigated by nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) software. Plots, visual predictive check (VPC), bootstrap and normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) were performed to determine the stability and the reliability of the final model. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination process was confirmed as the final structural model for BU. For a typical patient whose body surface area (BSA) is 1.7 m2 , the population typical values of CL and Vd were 11.86 L/h, and 48.2 L, respectively. The result suggested BSA showed significant influence on CL and Vd (P<.001). Plots revealed the final model was performing a goodness fit. The steady rate verified by bootstrap was 100%, relative deviation was less than 4.00%, estimated value of final model was in the 95% confidence interval (CI). The VPC results showed the observed values were almost all positioned within the 5th and 95th CIs. The mean and variance of the NPDE were 0.0363 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 0.298) and 0.877 (Fisher variance test, 0.134; SW test of normality, 0.108), respectively. The global adjusted P value was 0.305, which indicated that the prediction of the BU popPK model was adequate. A physician-friendly Microsoft Excel-base tool was implemented using the final popPK model for designing individualized dosing regimens.

Clinical Application of the Dried Blood Spot Method in the Measurement of Blood Busulfan Concentration.

The dried blood spot (DBS) method, which is a simple technique for blood sample processing involving the placement of a drop of whole blood onto filter paper, has been used recently in clinical pharmacology to determine blood concentrations of various drugs. This study examined the feasibility of the clinical application of the DBS method for individual busulfan dose adjustments. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of blood samples for busulfan measurements determined using the DBS method were compared with those using plasma separation (the conventional method). Blood samples were collected from patients receiving i.v. busulfan as a conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Toranomon Hospital, Japan. Samples collected 2, 4, and 6 hours after the start of the first drip infusion were processed by DBS or the conventional method. The area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and other PK parameters were calculated to compare the 2 methods. Divergence of <20% in each parameter was considered acceptable. The divergence range for each parameter was as follows: blood concentration at 2 hours after the start of drip infusion, .6 to 8.2%; at 4 hours, .3 to 10.0%; at 6 hours, .3 to 14.2%; and AUC0-∞, .0 to 10.3%. None of the PK parameters showed a divergence between the DBS method and the conventional method exceeding 20%, suggesting that both methods are well correlated. The clinical application of blood sample processing with the DBS method in the measurement of blood busulfan concentration may therefore be feasible, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Busulfan dosing algorithm and sampling strategy in stem cell transplantation patients.

AIM: The aim of this investigation was to develop a model-based dosing algorithm for busulfan and identify an optimal sampling scheme for use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical data from an ongoing study (n = 29) in stem cell transplantation patients were used for the purposes our analysis. A one compartment model was selected as basis for sampling optimization and subsequent evaluation of a suitable dosing algorithm. Internal and external model validation procedures were performed prior to the optimization steps using ED-optimality criteria. Using systemic exposure as parameter of interest, dosing algorithms were considered for individual patients with the scope of minimizing the deviation from target range as determined by AUC(0,6 h). RESULTS: Busulfan exposure after oral administration was best predicted after the inclusion of adjusted ideal body weight and alanine transferase as covariates on clearance. Population parameter estimates were 3.98 h(-1), 48.8 l and 12.3 l h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, volume of distribution and oral clearance, respectively. Inter-occasion variability was used to describe the differences between test dose and treatment. Based on simulation scenarios, a dosing algorithm was identified, which ensures target exposure values are attained after a test dose. Moreover, our findings show that a sparse sampling scheme with five samples per patient is sufficient to characterize the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in individual patients. CONCLUSION: The use of the proposed dosing algorithm in conjunction with a sparse sampling scheme may contribute to considerable improvement in the safety and efficacy profile of patients undergoing treatment for stem cell transplantation.

High-Throughput Validated Method for the Quantitation of Busulfan in Plasma Using Ultrafast SPE-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is an alkylating agent used to ablate bone marrow cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of its highly variable pharmacokinetics, studies have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring is clinically useful for patients undergoing bone marrow transplant so that toxic effects associated with high drug exposure could be reduced and improve clinical outcomes. Current methods for assaying busulfan include the use of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS), high-performance liquid chromatography, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The clinical need for faster turnaround times and increased testing volumes has required laboratories to develop faster methods of analysis for higher throughput of samples. Therefore, we present a method for the quantification of busulfan in plasma using an ultrafast solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry, which has much faster sample cycle times and similar analytical results to GC/MS. METHOD: Calibration standards, quality controls, and patient samples after addition of busulfan-d4 internal standard were extracted into n-butyl chloride from plasma. The organic fraction was dried and reconstituted in 600 µL of water containing ammonium acetate, trifluoroacetic acid, and formic acid. Sample analysis was performed at a rate of less than 20 seconds per sample using a Rapidfire 300 system coupled to an Agilent 6490 MS/MS using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. Concentrations were calculated based on a 5-point calibration curve using a 1/x linear curve fit. RESULTS: The analytical method shows excellent precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Minimal ion suppression or enhancement due to the matrix effect was observed. No significant carryover was seen following a sample containing 15,000 ng/mL of busulfan. Seventy-two patient samples were cross-validated with a current GC/MS method. All patient results throughout the analytical range correlated within the acceptance criteria of ±20%. The linear regression demonstrated the following: slope = 1.0067, r = 0.9964, and intercept = -6.2. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, fast, and robust method was developed for the quantitation of busulfan in plasma with solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry cycle times of <20 seconds per sample.

Glutathione Transferase Gene Variants Influence Busulfan Pharmacokinetics and Outcome After Myeloablative Conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) are frequently included in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both drugs are detoxified by glutathione transferases (GST), and GST gene variants may explain some of the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity. METHODS: The study investigated adult patients (n = 114) receiving oral Bu pre-HSCT. Bu doses were adjusted to obtain an average steady-state concentration (Css) of 900 mcg/L. RESULTS: Median first dose Bu Css was 1000 mcg/L (600-1780 mcg/L). Patients carrying 1 and 2 GSTA1*B (rs3957357) alleles demonstrated median 12% and 16% higher Bu Css (P ≤ 0.05). Bu exposure (average Css; odds ratio = 1.009, 95% confidence interval = 1.002-1.017, P = 0.013) and GSTM1 gene copy number (odds ratio = 17.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.46-201, P = 0.024) were significant predictors of mortality ≤30 days. The mortality was 25% versus 2% among carriers of 2 versus no GSTM1 copies (P = 0.021). Mortality ≤3 months was associated with higher first dose Bu exposure (1090 versus 980 mcg/L, P = 0.021). GSTM1 expression and high Bu exposure may increase Cy toxicity by reducing intracellular glutathione. CONCLUSIONS: GST genotyping before HSCT may allow better prediction of Bu pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity, and thereby improve outcome after BuCy conditioning.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to quantify plasma busulfan.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is an anti-leukemic, DNA alkylating agent that is used in conditioning regimens for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of the large intraindividual and interindividual variations seen in busulfan pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary. Currently at the authors' institution, plasma busulfan in adults is measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) at a reference laboratory, whereas pediatric specimens are sent to a different reference laboratory also for GC-MS analysis. As the result turnaround time is not optimal and this practice is of significant cost, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to quantify plasma busulfan was developed. METHODS: Protein precipitation with D8-busulfan (deuterated internal standard) in acetonitrile was carried out on 50 µL of heparinized plasma. Gradient elution with ammonium acetate, formic acid, water, and methanol at 0.6 mL/min had a 4-minute run time. Multiple reaction monitoring was employed using Q1/Q3 transitions of 264/151 and 264/55 for busulfan and 272/159 and 272/62 for D8-busulfan. RESULTS: Sample preparation took ∼30 minutes for 6 patient samples. Six calibrators were used (0-2000 ng/mL) with 3 quality controls (means of 12, 356, and 1535 ng/mL). The limits of detection and quantitation were 1 and 6 ng/mL, respectively. Extraction recovery was ∼77% and ion suppression ∼5%. Within-run and between-run precision studies yielded <15% coefficient of variation at the limit of quantitation and <6% coefficient of variation through the rest of the linear range. Method comparisons between this assay and 2 GC-MS assays revealed mean biases of 7% and 1%. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate, rapid, and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantification of plasma busulfan was developed. This assay reduces current specimen volume requirements, reduces result turnaround time for patients and clinicians, and additionally saves institutional funds.

Predictive performance of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of busulfan in children.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of the DNA-alkylating agent busulfan was slightly modified and scaled from adults to children in order to predict the systemic busulfan drug exposure in children. Capitalizing on the recent major software release of PK-Sim®, we refined our PBPK model by implementing glutathione S transferase (GST) in 11 organs using the software integrated enzyme expression database. In addition, two irreversible binding processes (i.e., DNA and plasma protein binding) were applied by using Koff and KD values. The model was scaled from adults to children. Simulations were computed and compared to concentration-time data after intravenous (i.v.) busulfan administration to 36 children. Based on the results, an age-dependent enzyme activity and maturation ratio was tailored and evaluated with an external dataset consisting of 23 children. Initial adult to children scaling indicated lower clearance values for children in comparison to adults. Subsequent age-dependent maturation ratio resulted in three different age groups: Activity of busulfan-glutathione conjugate formation was 80%, 61%, and 89% in comparison to adults for children with an age of up to 2 years, > 2-6 years, and > 6-18 years, respectively. Patients of the evaluation dataset were simulated with a mean percentage error (MPE) for all patients of 3.9% with 3/23 children demonstrating a MPE of > ±30%. The PBPK model parameterization sufficiently described the observed concentration-time data of the validation dataset while showing an adequate predictive performance. This PBPK model could be helpful to determine the first dose of busulfan in children.

Evaluation of Busulfan as a Third-Party Immunoassay on a Clinical Chemistry Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens to prepare patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical due to large inter- and intra-individual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and the risk of adverse consequences of toxicity including hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Busulfan is most commonly measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is not as widely available in clinical laboratories as automated routine clinical chemistry analyzers. The objective was to perform analytical verification of a busulfan immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. METHODS: The MyCare Oncology busulfan immunoassay was configured as a third-party reagent on the Abbott Alinity c. Imprecision, linearity, sample carryover, and onboard stability of reagent studies were evaluated. The performance of the busulfan immunoassay using the Abbott Alinity c was compared to the Beckman Coulter AU480 using sodium heparinized plasma, as well as to LC-MS/MS using lithium heparinized plasma. RESULTS: The imprecision goal of 8% was met, and linearity within the analytical measurement range of 240 to 1700 ng/mL was verified. Sample carryover was negligible, and the reagents were stable onboard for at least 84 days. The busulfan immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS (slope = 0.949, y-intercept = -7.8 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9935) and the Beckman Coulter AU480 (slope = 1.090, y-intercept = -34.5 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9988). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated successful analytical verification of a busulfan third-party immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. The ability to perform TDM of busulfan on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer will positively impact turnaround times to improve patient outcomes.

A rapid & sensitive liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitation of busulfan levels in plasma & application for routine therapeutic monitoring in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Busulfan (Bu) in combination with cyclophosphamide is widely used in myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Its narrow therapeutic range and toxic side effects at high systemic exposure and graft rejection at low exposure emphasize the need for busulfan dose optimization using targeted dose adjustment prior to HSCT. We report here a rapid and sensitive method to quantitate busulfan plasma levels in patients receiving busulfan as part of pre-transplant conditioning. METHODS: The method involves simple protein precipitation of the plasma followed by analysis using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry - electrospray ionization technique (LC-ESI MS/MS) in positive ionization mode and quantified using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Deuterated busulfan (d8-busulf`an) was used as the internal standard. RESULTS: The method was linear for the concentration ranging from 0 to 4000 ng/ml of busulfan with a limit of detection of 2 ng/ml and limit of quantitation of 5 ng/ml. The assay was accurate for serial concentrations of Bu in plasma for five consecutive days and the CV was less than 10 per cent. CONCLUSION: Using this rapid and sensitive method, busulfan levels were targeted and subsequent doses adjusted at our center in 26 patients receiving high dose busulfan in combination with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.