[The coroner's autopsies in the Great Britain: the problems related to the quality of the studies, standardization, auditing, financial support and the approaches to their solution]. / Koronerskaia autopsiia v Velikobritanii: problemy kachestva issledovanii, standartizatsii, audita, finansirovaniia i puti ikh resheniia.

This article continues the series of previous publications of the authors based on the analysis of the detailed report of the experts of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death program (NCEPOD) designed to evaluate the quality of autopsies carried out by the coroners in the Great Britain. It was shown that only in 13 to 55% of the 1,691 case the operators had an opportunity to refer the necropsy materials for the pathological study. The problems encountered in association with histological and toxicological analysis arose from the misunderstanding between the coroners and the pathologists as regard the organizational aspects of autopsy studies as swell as the financial and economic considerations. The Coroner Rules that had been adopted in 1984 and remained in force in the country until 2005 needed to be radically revised, corrected, and amended to facilitate the solution of a number of problems and eliminate the formal organizational and technical contradictions that hampered the further improvement of the quality of autopsies that must be performed by the corners at the national rather than the local level. The maximum number of the unacceptable results were revealed in the protocols of autopsires carried out by the forensic medical experts. All pathologists in the Great Britain are recommended to pay special attention to all cases of sudden death of the adult subjects and the deceased epileptic patients. The detailed investigations are mandatory in all cases of death following medical manipulations, such as surgical interventions, and complications.

[The coroner's autopsies in the Great Britain: the problems related to the quality of the studies, standardization, auditing, financial support and the approaches to their solution]. / Koronerskaia autopsiia v Velikobritanii: problemy kachestva issledovanii, standartizatsii, audita, finansirovaniia i puti ikh resheniia.

The objective of the present study was to analyze the experience of the coroners and pathologists in the Great Britain based on the results of the coroner's autopsies and recommendations of the experts involved in the activities carried out in the framework of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death program (NCEPOD). The recommendations are designed to reform the country's medical examiner system, improve the equipment of the mortuary facilities, and optimize funding for the autopsy studies. The authors consider in the chronological order the following issues of the coroners and pathologists' activities: organization of their work and its procedural aspects, ordering coroner's autopsies, preparation for their performance, analysis of the relevant documentation (autopsy reports) and medical case histories (discharge summaries). Also discussed are the recommendations of the NCEPOD experts for the improvement of the said studies with the detailed analysis of the causes underlying the aforementioned problems and concise comments of the authors.

[The coroner's autopsies in the Great Britain: the problems related to the quality of the studies, standardization, auditing, financial support and the approaches to their solution (part 2)]. / Koronerskaia autopsiia v Velikobritanii: problemy kachestva issledovanii, standartizatsii, audita, finansirovaniia i puti ikh resheniia (chast' 2).

This article extends the previous publication of the authors based on the analysis of the detailed report of the experts of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death program (NCEPOD) issued in the Great Britain in 2006. The analysis has demonstrated that all autopsy studies should invariably involve measurement of the corpse length and weight (including body mass index) as well as the detailed description of all injuries to the body (or references to their absence). All autopsy studies should be carried out only by a medical professional (e.g. a pathologist, histologist, forensic medical expert, etc.). The thorough examination of the cadaver is mandatory prior to evisceration. The maximum scope of the examination of all body cavities with the comprehensive description of all internal organs and systems is compulsory. Putrefaction and decomposition of the corpse can not be regarded as a justification for its perfunctory ('restricted') inspection; on the contrary, these dictate the necessity of a more careful examination with the compulsory description of all organs and body systems as well as harvesting biological fluids and tissues for the laboratory analyses (including histological, toxicological, and other relevant studies).

Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. METHODS: Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. RESULTS: A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance. CONCLUSIONS: The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.

An empirical approach to the New Zealand government's review of the coronial jurisdiction.

Given the public profile of New Zealand coroners, it is surprising that there has been limited empirical research about coroners' decision-making. This article uses evidence from New Zealand's first empirical study of coroners' recommendations to discuss the New Zealand government's recent review of the coronial jurisdiction. In June and October 2013, New Zealand's Courts Minister announced proposed changes to the coronial system. Several of the Minister's proposals are consistent with the empirical evidence, but there are also significant gaps in the review. The Minister's review acknowledges the importance of coroners' preventive function, but will the proposals enable New Zealand's coronial law to achieve its full preventive potential? The empirical evidence suggests that the prophylactic potential of coroners' recommendations is not being maximised.

Coroners and medical examiners: mutualism, commensalism or parasitism?

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 includes provisions for reform of the certification of death and the introduction of "Medical Examiners", who will scrutinise the certification of every death that is not referred to the Coroner for investigation. When these changes are implemented, Coroners and Medical Examiners will have to work closely together. But the boundaries between the two roles are not perfectly defined. Will they work together in synergy, or will they interact unwillingly and abrasively? It is clear which approach will be best for the bereaved and for society, but it is less clear what will actually happen. Medical Examiners will be led by a new Chief Medical Examiner, and Coroners will have a Chief Coroner. But these individuals will have limited powers to oblige Coroners and Medical Examiners to collaborate. It seems inevitable that there will be large variations in practice, at least initially.

Autism BrainNet: A Collaboration Between Medical Examiners, Pathologists, Researchers, and Families to Advance the Understanding and Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

CONTEXT.­: Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects over 1% of the population worldwide. Developing effective preventions and treatments for autism will depend on understanding the neuropathology of the disorder. While evidence from magnetic resonance imaging indicates altered development of the autistic brain, it lacks the resolution needed to identify the cellular and molecular underpinnings of the disorder. Postmortem studies of human brain tissue currently represent the only viable option to pursuing these critical studies. Historically, the availability of autism brain tissue has been extremely limited. OBJECTIVE.­: To overcome this limitation, Autism BrainNet, funded by the Simons Foundation, was formed as a network of brain collection sites that work in a coordinated fashion to develop a library of human postmortem brain tissues for distribution to researchers worldwide. Autism BrainNet has collection sites (or Nodes) in California, Texas, and Massachusetts; affiliated, international Nodes are located in Oxford, England and Montreal, Quebec, Canada. DATA SOURCES.­: Pubmed, Autism BrainNet. CONCLUSIONS.­: Because the death of autistic individuals is often because of an accident, drowning, suicide, or sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, they often are seen in a medical examiner's or coroner's office. Yet, autism is rarely considered when evaluating the cause of death. Advances in our understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy have occurred because medical examiners and neuropathologists questioned whether a pathologic change might exist in individuals who played contact sports and later developed severe behavioral problems. This article highlights the potential for equally significant breakthroughs in autism arising from the proactive efforts of medical examiners, pathologists, and coroners in partnership with Autism BrainNet.

Development of a coroner-based surveillance system for drug-related deaths in Los Angeles county.

Existing data sources do not provide comprehensive and timely information to adequately monitor drug-related mortality in Los Angeles County. To fill this gap, a surveillance system using coroner data was developed to examine patterns in drug-related deaths. The coroner provided data on all injury deaths in Los Angeles County. A list of keywords that indicate a death was caused by drug use was developed. The cause of death variables in the coroner data were searched for mentions of one of the keywords; if a keyword was detected, that death was classified as drug related. The effectiveness of the keyword list in classifying drug-related deaths was evaluated by matching records in the coroner death data to records in the state death files. Then, the drug-related deaths identified using the keywords were compared to drug-related deaths in the state mortality files identified using International Classification of Death codes. Toxicological test results were used to categorize drug-related deaths based on the type and legality of the drug(s) ingested. Mortality rates were calculated for each category of drug and legal status and for different demographic groups. Compared to the gold standard state mortality files, the coroner data had a sensitivity of 95.6% for identifying drug-related deaths. Over three quarters of all drug-related deaths tested positive for opiates and/or stimulants. Males, Whites, and 35-54-year-olds each accounted for more than half of all drug-related deaths. The surveillance of drug-related deaths using coroner data has several advantages: data are available in a timely fashion, the data include information about the specific substances each victim ingested, and the data can be broken down to compare mortality among specific subpopulations.

Anglo-Australian coronial law reform: the widening gap.

The Coroners Act 2009 (UK) has made disappointingly little progress toward a modern, integrated, prevention-focused coronial system for the United Kingdom. The opportunities afforded by the Shipman scandal and an exhaustive consultation process have yielded remarkably little by way of substantive reform and professionalisation of what is an increasingly outmoded system for investigating death in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, By contrast, during 2008 and 2009 New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria have each built upon the reform initiatives of New Zealand's Coroners Act 2006 (NZ) to introduce important and innovative amendments to their coronial jurisdictions' capacity to investigate deaths. It is to be hoped that in due course the diversity of Australian coronial legislation will be addressed by nationally consistent legislation.

The Coroners Act 2008 (Vic): a medical investigator's perspective.

The legal basis of the medical investigation of deaths for the coroner has changed with the implementation of the Coroners Act 2008 (Vic) in Victoria. For the first time in Australia the notion of "preliminary examinations" has been created whereby medical investigators, for the most part forensic pathologists, have authority to carry out their own investigations without oversight or specific directions from a coroner. Presentation of a body to a medical investigator is sufficient authority for a range of procedures to be carried out, including external examinations, various forms of imaging, eg CT scans, as well as sampling of the surface of the body, wounds and oral cavities. Forensic odontology examinations may be undertaken and samples of body fluids collected and rapidly analysed (within 24 hours) for the presence of drugs or infections. Although incisions may be made in the body to obtain fluids for analysis, the dissection and removal of tissues may not be carried out without an order from the coroner. The findings of these preliminary examinations are reported to the coroner who, as a result, has access to far more detailed evidence upon which to base a decision as to whether to order an autopsy In addition, the more detailed medical information allows the coroner to direct the legal aspects of the ongoing investigation in a more efficient and focused manner. The introduction of this new medical process in Victoria has resulted in the autopsy rate diminishing to around 50% of deaths reported to a coroner.

Nurses and Medicolegal Death Investigation.

Forensic nurses currently serve in medicolegal death investigation settings nationwide, yet registered nurses seldom recognize death investigation as a career option. The purpose of this article is to describe medicolegal death investigation in the United States and the roles nurses can achieve, depending upon state and agency job requirements. Duties and qualifications for job positions, whether filled by election, appointment, or staff hiring, are described to provide examples of nurses' roles within the medicolegal death investigation setting and to present career options. Forensic nurses have the educational preparation, medical skills, and forensic knowledge to serve within death investigation systems as a chief officer (e.g., coroner), deputy officer, or staff investigator.

A Census of Medicolegal Death Investigation in the United States: A Need to Determine the State of our Nation's Toxicology Laboratories and Their Preparedness for the Current Drug Overdose Epidemic.

In 2007, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported on 2004 data collected from the Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices (CMEC). The CMEC was one of the first comprehensive reports on the state of the medicolegal death investigation system in the United States and included information on administration, expenditure, workload, specialized death investigations, records and evidence retention, and resources. However, the report did not include responses on questions that were related to toxicology such as specimen retention and type of testing. The purpose of this publication is to provide the community with toxicology laboratory-specific responses from nearly 2000 medical examiner and coroner (MEC) offices. Data obtained from a BJS CMEC public use dataset for any remaining information that was not reported in the 2007 BJS report were evaluated specific to the operation of toxicology laboratories within a MEC office or specific to toxicology testing. The CMEC includes information on average operating budget for MEC offices with internal or external toxicology services, budget for toxicology/microbiology services, respondents' routine uses of toxicology analysis, toxicology specimen retention time, average turnaround times, use of computerized information management systems, and participation in federal data collections. These historical data begin to address the present state of our nation's toxicology laboratories within the medicolegal death investigation system and their preparedness for the current drug overdose epidemic.

COVID-19 instigates resurgence of 'needless autopsies' issue in India.

COVID-19 has swamped the entire world and turned into a pandemic. Its high contagiousness compelled authorities to categorize all autopsies as 'high risk' considering the risk of exposure to the healthcare workers. In India, the Criminal Procedure Code authorizes investigating police officer to hold an inquest into suspicious deaths. The present article draw attention towards the 'needless autopsies' in times of COVID-19 and emphasizes on causes and recommendations.

The Medical Examiner/Coroner's Guide for Contaminated Deceased Body Management.

In the past few years, a number of publications and other resources have appeared concerning the management of mass fatality incidents. Some are geared toward the general management of incidents while others cover more specific topics such as decontamination procedures. Still others cover selected agents, including chemical, biologic, or radiologic ones. Few publications have been written specifically for medical examiners and coroners. The Medical Examiner and Coroner's Guide for Contaminated Deceased Body Management is written specifically for the medical examiner or coroner who will be in charge of investigations of fatalities that result from terrorism or other events that result in contaminated remains. In some such cases, agents may be used that will require mitigation of environmental hazards and decontamination of human bodies. To that end, this Guide provides information and suggestions that may be useful in understanding the principles involved in decontamination procedures, recognizing that it may not be the medical examiner or coroner staff who actually conducts decontamination procedures. The suggestions in this guide may differ slightly from those in other publications. However, those who have contributed to this guide believe that the recommendations are practical, workable, have a scientific basis, and do not differ much in substance when compared with other relevant publications. The contents of this Guide may be reproduced for practical use but the Guide may not be sold and it may not be cited for advertisement purposes. Reference to specific commercial products is for informational purposes only and does not constitute endorsement of the product or company which produces the product. The recommendations contained in this Guide are not mandated nor are they required by federal, state, or local law. Rather, the recommendations are intended to assist medical examiners and coroners for the purposes of planning and providing a set of reasonable practice guidelines for incident response.

Information on practical procedures following death.

This article outlines the procedures following a death and examines funeral arrangements, including the different types of burial and the cremation process.

The coronial system in Queensland: the effects of new legislation on decision-making.

The purpose of this article is to detail research completed in 2007 which investigated the way in which coroners made decisions in a death investigation, with a particular focus on their autopsy decision-making. The data were gathered during the first year of operation of a new Coroners Act in Queensland, Australia, which required a greater amount of information to be gathered at the scene by police, and this included a thorough investigation of the circumstances of the death, including statements from witnesses, friends and family, as well as evidence-gathering at the scene. This article addresses the outcomes of that increased information on coronial decision-making in three ways: first, whether or not the greater amount of information offered to coroners enabled them to be less reliant on full internal autopsies to establish cause of death; secondly whether certain factors were more influential in decision-making; and thirdly, whether the information gathered at the scene negates the need for full internal autopsies in many situations, irrespective of the decision-making by coroners.

Coronial cases highlight failings in mental health patient management.

The state of mental health services is like a barometer of how well our public health system is working overall. Changes to patient care and staff safety have necessarily been on the reform agenda for mental health in recent years as details of mishandled cases come to light. Below are two such cases heard in Queensland's Coroners Court whose findings were handed down earlier this year. The details of both these cases offer instructive advice about how mental health care should not be delivered in our public system. More sadly, they highlight how vulnerability of people suffering severe episodes of mental illness once they're in the care of our health system.

Challenges to implementation of the new Coroners' (Amendment) Rules 2005: experience from a tertiary paediatric pathology centre.

In the UK sudden unexpected childhood deaths are referred to Her Majesty's Coroner (HMC) for postmortem examination during which small tissue samples are obtained for diagnostic purposes. Recent changes to regulate tissue use include the Coroners' (Amendment) Rules 2005. We audited the impact of these at a specialist paediatric centre. A retrospective audit of HMC tissue forms for autopsies was performed between 1 June 2005 - 31 May 2006, with regard to the options provided to, and chosen by, parents. Of 213 coronial autopsies, 178 were non-forensic. Tissue forms were submitted pre-autopsy in 25 (14%). An additional 47 were received after sending follow-up letters for a total of 72/178 (40%). Forms varied between coroners, but most failed to distinguish between blocks, slides, and other tissue samples and 6/40 (15%) forms did not specifically allow an option for research consent. Forty-three (60%) parents opted for retention, with 34 (79%) also consenting to research. Only six (8%) requested return of tissue. A simple, unified tissue disposal form and information sheet for all HMC districts, which includes appropriate options, would ensure that parents' wishes are met, to achieve best practice, maximise sample availability for positive societal outcomes such as teaching and research, and to comply with new regulations.