Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 415
Filter
1.
Cell ; 177(2): 326-338.e16, 2019 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879787

ABSTRACT

Crossing over is a nearly universal feature of sexual reproduction. Here, analysis of crossover numbers on a per-chromosome and per-nucleus basis reveals a fundamental, evolutionarily conserved feature of meiosis: within individual nuclei, crossover frequencies covary across different chromosomes. This effect results from per-nucleus covariation of chromosome axis lengths. Crossovers can promote evolutionary adaptation. However, the benefit of creating favorable new allelic combinations must outweigh the cost of disrupting existing favorable combinations. Covariation concomitantly increases the frequencies of gametes with especially high, or especially low, numbers of crossovers, and thus might concomitantly enhance the benefits of crossing over while reducing its costs. A four-locus population genetic model suggests that such an effect can pertain in situations where the environment fluctuates: hyper-crossover gametes are advantageous when the environment changes while hypo-crossover gametes are advantageous in periods of environmental stasis. These findings reveal a new feature of the basic meiotic program and suggest a possible adaptive advantage.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Animals , Cell Nucleus , Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes/genetics , Chromosomes/physiology , Computer Simulation , Female , Genetics, Population/methods , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Humans , Solanum lycopersicum/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex
2.
Annu Rev Genet ; 57: 1-63, 2023 11 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788458

ABSTRACT

The raison d'être of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are enabled by a complex cellular program in which interactions between homologous chromosomes play a central role. We first provide a background regarding the basic principles of this program. We then summarize the current understanding of the DNA events of recombination and of three processes that involve whole chromosomes: homolog pairing, crossover interference, and chiasma maturation. All of these processes are implemented by direct physical interaction of recombination complexes with underlying chromosome structures. Finally, we present convergent lines of evidence that the meiotic program may have evolved by coupling of this interaction to late-stage mitotic chromosome morphogenesis.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing , Meiosis , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Chromosomes/genetics , DNA , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics
3.
Mol Cell ; 78(6): 1252-1263.e3, 2020 06 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362315

ABSTRACT

Crossover recombination is critical for meiotic chromosome segregation, but how mammalian crossing over is accomplished is poorly understood. Here, we illuminate how strands exchange during meiotic recombination in male mice by analyzing patterns of heteroduplex DNA in recombinant molecules preserved by the mismatch correction deficiency of Msh2-/- mutants. Surprisingly, MSH2-dependent recombination suppression was not evident. However, a substantial fraction of crossover products retained heteroduplex DNA, and some provided evidence of MSH2-independent correction. Biased crossover resolution was observed, consistent with asymmetry between DNA ends in earlier intermediates. Many crossover products yielded no heteroduplex DNA, suggesting dismantling by D-loop migration. Unlike the complexity of crossovers in yeast, these simple modifications of the original double-strand break repair model-asymmetry in recombination intermediates and D-loop migration-may be sufficient to explain most meiotic crossing over in mice while also addressing long-standing questions related to Holliday junction resolution.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Homologous Recombination/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Animals , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA, Cruciform/genetics , DNA, Cruciform/metabolism , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred DBA , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/metabolism , Nucleic Acid Heteroduplexes/genetics
4.
Nature ; 583(7815): 259-264, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32494014

ABSTRACT

Meiosis, although essential for reproduction, is also variable and error-prone: rates of chromosome crossover vary among gametes, between the sexes, and among humans of the same sex, and chromosome missegregation leads to abnormal chromosome numbers (aneuploidy)1-8. To study diverse meiotic outcomes and how they covary across chromosomes, gametes and humans, we developed Sperm-seq, a way of simultaneously analysing the genomes of thousands of individual sperm. Here we analyse the genomes of 31,228 human gametes from 20 sperm donors, identifying 813,122 crossovers and 787 aneuploid chromosomes. Sperm donors had aneuploidy rates ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 aneuploidies per gamete; crossovers partially protected chromosomes from nondisjunction at the meiosis I cell division. Some chromosomes and donors underwent more-frequent nondisjunction during meiosis I, and others showed more meiosis II segregation failures. Sperm genomes also manifested many genomic anomalies that could not be explained by simple nondisjunction. Diverse recombination phenotypes-from crossover rates to crossover location and separation, a measure of crossover interference-covaried strongly across individuals and cells. Our results can be incorporated with earlier observations into a unified model in which a core mechanism, the variable physical compaction of meiotic chromosomes, generates interindividual and cell-to-cell variation in diverse meiotic phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Genome, Human/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Spermatozoa/cytology , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Alleles , Aneuploidy , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Male , Nondisjunction, Genetic , Single-Cell Analysis , Tissue Donors , Young Adult
5.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 120(23): e2221746120, 2023 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252974

ABSTRACT

Crossovers (CO) shuffle genetic information and physically connect homologous chromosomal pairs, ensuring their balanced segregation during meiosis. COs arising from the major class I pathway require the activity of the well-conserved group of ZMM proteins, which, in conjunction with MLH1, facilitate the maturation of DNA recombination intermediates specifically into COs. The HEI10 Interacting Protein 1 (HEIP1) was identified in rice and proposed to be a new, plant-specific member of the ZMM group. Here, we establish and decipher the function of the Arabidopsis thaliana HEIP1 homolog in meiotic crossover formation and report its wide conservation in eukaryotes. We show that the loss of Arabidopsis HEIP1 elicits a marked reduction in meiotic COs and their redistribution toward chromosome ends. Epistasis analysis showed that AtHEIP1 acts specifically in the class I CO pathway. Further, we show that HEIP1 acts both prior to crossover designation, as the number of MLH1 foci is reduced in heip1, and at the maturation step of MLH1-marked sites into COs. Despite the HEIP1 protein being predicted to be primarily unstructured and very divergent at the sequence level, we identified homologs of HEIP1 in an extensive range of eukaryotes, including mammals.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis , Crossing Over, Genetic , Humans , Animals , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Meiosis/genetics , Mammals
6.
Cell Mol Life Sci ; 81(1): 194, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653846

ABSTRACT

Sex chromosome aneuploidies are among the most common variations in human whole chromosome copy numbers, with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 1:400 to 1:1400 live births. Unlike whole-chromosome aneuploidies of autosomes, those of sex chromosomes, such as the 47, XXY aneuploidy that causes Klinefelter Syndrome (KS), often originate from the paternal side, caused by a lack of crossover (CO) formation between the X and Y chromosomes. COs must form between all chromosome pairs to pass meiotic checkpoints and are the product of meiotic recombination that occurs between homologous sequences of parental chromosomes. Recombination between male sex chromosomes is more challenging compared to both autosomes and sex chromosomes in females, as it is restricted within a short region of homology between X and Y, called the pseudo-autosomal region (PAR). However, in normal individuals, CO formation occurs in PAR with a higher frequency than in any other region, indicating the presence of mechanisms that promote the initiation and processing of recombination in each meiotic division. In recent years, research has made great strides in identifying genes and mechanisms that facilitate CO formation in the PAR. Here, we outline the most recent and relevant findings in this field. XY chromosome aneuploidy in humans has broad-reaching effects, contributing significantly also to Turner syndrome, spontaneous abortions, oligospermia, and even infertility. Thus, in the years to come, the identification of genes and mechanisms beyond XY aneuploidy is expected to have an impact on the genetic counseling of a wide number of families and adults affected by these disorders.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing , Chromosome Segregation , Meiosis , Humans , Animals , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Mice , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Female , Aneuploidy , Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , Sex Chromosomes/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics
7.
PLoS Biol ; 19(1): e3001061, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33444322

ABSTRACT

Mosaic animals have provided the platform for many fundamental discoveries in developmental biology, cell biology, and other fields. Techniques to produce mosaic animals by mitotic recombination have been extensively developed in Drosophila melanogaster but are less common for other laboratory organisms. Here, we report mosaic analysis by gRNA-induced crossing-over (MAGIC), a new technique for generating mosaic animals based on DNA double-strand breaks produced by CRISPR/Cas9. MAGIC efficiently produces mosaic clones in both somatic tissues and the germline of Drosophila. Further, by developing a MAGIC toolkit for 1 chromosome arm, we demonstrate the method's application in characterizing gene function in neural development and in generating fluorescently marked clones in wild-derived Drosophila strains. Eliminating the need to introduce recombinase-recognition sites into the genome, this simple and versatile system simplifies mosaic analysis in Drosophila and can in principle be applied in any organism that is compatible with CRISPR/Cas9.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Mosaicism/embryology , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida/physiology , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cloning, Molecular/methods , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Female , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Targeting/methods , Genetic Vectors , Genome, Insect , Male , Phenotype
8.
Nature ; 561(7723): 338-342, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185906

ABSTRACT

Meiotic recombination differs between males and females; however, when and how these differences are established is unknown. Here we identify extensive sex differences at the initiation of recombination by mapping hotspots of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks in male and female mice. Contrary to past findings in humans, few hotspots are used uniquely in either sex. Instead, grossly different recombination landscapes result from up to fifteen-fold differences in hotspot usage between males and females. Indeed, most recombination occurs at sex-biased hotspots. Sex-biased hotspots seem to be partly determined by chromosome structure, and DNA methylation, which is absent in females at the onset of meiosis, has a substantial role. Sex differences are also evident later in meiosis as the rate at which meiotic breaks are repaired as crossovers differs between males and females in distal regions. The suppression of distal crossovers may help to minimize age-related aneuploidy that arises owing to cohesion loss during dictyate arrest in females.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Sex Characteristics , Animals , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Methylation/genetics , Female , Male , Mice
9.
PLoS Genet ; 17(4): e1009532, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872316

ABSTRACT

Recombination between the X and Y human sex chromosomes is limited to the two pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) that present quite distinct evolutionary origins. Despite the crucial importance for male meiosis, genetic diversity patterns and evolutionary dynamics of these regions are poorly understood. In the present study, we analyzed and compared the genetic diversity of the PAR regions using publicly available genomic sequences encompassing both PAR1 and PAR2. Comparisons were performed through allele diversities, linkage disequilibrium status and recombination frequencies within and between X and Y chromosomes. In agreement with previous studies, we confirmed the role of PAR1 as a male-specific recombination hotspot, but also observed similar characteristic patterns of diversity in both regions although male recombination occurs at PAR2 to a much lower extent (at least one recombination event at PAR1 and in ≈1% in normal male meioses at PAR2). Furthermore, we demonstrate that both PARs harbor significantly different allele frequencies between X and Y chromosomes, which could support that recombination is not sufficient to homogenize the pseudoautosomal gene pool or is counterbalanced by other evolutionary forces. Nevertheless, the observed patterns of diversity are not entirely explainable by sexually antagonistic selection. A better understanding of such processes requires new data from intergenerational transmission studies of PARs, which would be decisive on the elucidation of PARs evolution and their role in male-driven heterosomal aneuploidies.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, X/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , Pseudoautosomal Regions/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Chromosome Mapping/methods , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Female , Gene Frequency/genetics , Genetic Linkage , Humans , Linkage Disequilibrium/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics
10.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(17)2021 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33883277

ABSTRACT

The position of recombination events established along chromosomes in early prophase I and the chromosome remodeling that takes place in late prophase I are intrinsically linked steps of meiosis that need to be tightly regulated to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and haploid gamete formation. Here, we show that RAD-51 foci, which form at the sites of programmed meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), exhibit a biased distribution toward off-centered positions along the chromosomes in wild-type Caenorhabditis elegans, and we identify two meiotic roles for chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 that ensure normal chromosome remodeling in late prophase I. During early prophase I, HIM-17 regulates the distribution of DSB-dependent RAD-51 foci and crossovers on chromosomes, which is critical for the formation of distinct chromosome subdomains (short and long arms of the bivalents) later during chromosome remodeling. During late prophase I, HIM-17 promotes the normal expression and localization of protein phosphatases GSP-1/2 to the surface of the bivalent chromosomes and may promote GSP-1 phosphorylation, thereby antagonizing Aurora B kinase AIR-2 loading on the long arms and preventing premature loss of sister chromatid cohesion. We propose that HIM-17 plays distinct roles at different stages during meiotic progression that converge to promote normal chromosome remodeling and accurate chromosome segregation.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis/physiology , Recombination, Genetic/physiology , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/physiology , Cell Cycle/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/physiology , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , Rad51 Recombinase/metabolism , Recombination, Genetic/genetics
11.
PLoS Genet ; 17(7): e1009663, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252074

ABSTRACT

Homologous recombination is a high-fidelity repair pathway for DNA double-strand breaks employed during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Such repair can lead to genetic exchange, originating from crossover (CO) generation. In mitosis, COs are suppressed to prevent sister chromatid exchange. Here, the BTR complex, consisting of the Bloom helicase (HIM-6 in worms), topoisomerase 3 (TOP-3), and the RMI1 (RMH-1 and RMH-2) and RMI2 scaffolding proteins, is essential for dismantling joint DNA molecules to form non-crossovers (NCOs) via decatenation. In contrast, in meiosis COs are essential for accurate chromosome segregation and the BTR complex plays distinct roles in CO and NCO generation at different steps in meiotic recombination. RMI2 stabilizes the RMI1 scaffolding protein, and lack of RMI2 in mitosis leads to elevated sister chromatid exchange, as observed upon RMI1 knockdown. However, much less is known about the involvement of RMI2 in meiotic recombination. So far, RMI2 homologs have been found in vertebrates and plants, but not in lower organisms such as Drosophila, yeast, or worms. We report the identification of the Caenorhabditis elegans functional homolog of RMI2, which we named RMIF-2. The protein shows a dynamic localization pattern to recombination foci during meiotic prophase I and concentration into recombination foci is mutually dependent on other BTR complex proteins. Comparative analysis of the rmif-2 and rmh-1 phenotypes revealed numerous commonalities, including in regulating CO formation and directing COs toward chromosome arms. Surprisingly, the prevalence of heterologous recombination was several fold lower in the rmif-2 mutant, suggesting that RMIF-2 may be dispensable or less strictly required for some BTR complex-mediated activities during meiosis.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/genetics , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Meiosis/physiology , Sister Chromatid Exchange/genetics
12.
Genes Dev ; 30(6): 700-17, 2016 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26966248

ABSTRACT

Mph1 is a member of the conserved FANCM family of DNA motor proteins that play key roles in genome maintenance processes underlying Fanconi anemia, a cancer predisposition syndrome in humans. Here, we identify Mte1 as a novel interactor of the Mph1 helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In vitro, Mte1 (Mph1-associated telomere maintenance protein 1) binds directly to DNA with a preference for branched molecules such as D loops and fork structures. In addition, Mte1 stimulates the helicase and fork regression activities of Mph1 while inhibiting the ability of Mph1 to dissociate recombination intermediates. Deletion of MTE1 reduces crossover recombination and suppresses the sensitivity of mph1Δ mutant cells to replication stress. Mph1 and Mte1 interdependently colocalize at DNA damage-induced foci and dysfunctional telomeres, and MTE1 deletion results in elongated telomeres. Taken together, our data indicate that Mte1 plays a role in regulation of crossover recombination, response to replication stress, and telomere maintenance.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DEAD-box RNA Helicases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Telomere Homeostasis/genetics , Telomere-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DEAD-box RNA Helicases/genetics , Gene Deletion , Protein Transport , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Stress, Physiological/genetics , Telomere-Binding Proteins/genetics
13.
Trends Genet ; 36(5): 337-346, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294414

ABSTRACT

During scientific investigations, the explanation of remarkably interesting phenomena must often await development of new methods or accrual of new observations that in retrospect can lead to lucid answers to the initial problem. A case in point is the control of genetic recombination during meiosis, which leads to crossovers between chromosomes critical for production of healthy offspring. Crossovers must be properly placed along meiotic chromosomes for their accurate segregation. Here, we review observations on two aspects of meiotic crossover control - crossover interference and repression of crossovers near centromeres, both observed more than 85 years ago. Only recently have relatively simple molecular mechanisms for these phenomena become clear through advances in both methods and understanding the molecular basis of meiotic recombination.


Subject(s)
Centromere/genetics , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Homologous Recombination/genetics
14.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(16): 9353-9373, 2021 09 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34417612

ABSTRACT

Meiotic recombination is integrated into and regulated by meiotic chromosomes, which is organized as loop/axis architecture. However, the regulation of chromosome organization is poorly understood. Here, we show Esa1, the NuA4 complex catalytic subunit, is constitutively expressed and localizes on chromatin loops during meiosis. Esa1 plays multiple roles including homolog synapsis, sporulation efficiency, spore viability, and chromosome segregation in meiosis. Detailed analyses show the meiosis-specific depletion of Esa1 results in decreased chromosome axis length independent of another axis length regulator Pds5, which further leads to a decreased number of Mer2 foci, and consequently a decreased number of DNA double-strand breaks, recombination intermediates, and crossover frequency. However, Esa1 depletion does not impair the occurrence of the obligatory crossover required for faithful chromosome segregation, or the strength of crossover interference. Further investigations demonstrate Esa1 regulates chromosome axis length via acetylating the N-terminal tail of histone H4 but not altering transcription program. Therefore, we firstly show a non-chromosome axis component, Esa1, acetylates histone H4 on chromatin loops to regulate chromosome axis length and consequently recombination frequency but does not affect the basic meiotic recombination process. Additionally, Esa1 depletion downregulates middle induced meiotic genes, which probably causing defects in sporulation and chromosome segregation.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Histone Acetyltransferases/genetics , Histones/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Acetylation , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Spores, Fungal/genetics , Spores, Fungal/growth & development , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics
15.
PLoS Genet ; 16(9): e1009001, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886661

ABSTRACT

During meiosis, diploid organisms reduce their chromosome number by half to generate haploid gametes. This process depends on the repair of double strand DNA breaks as crossover recombination events between homologous chromosomes, which hold homologs together to ensure their proper segregation to opposite spindle poles during the first meiotic division. Although most organisms are limited in the number of crossovers between homologs by a phenomenon called crossover interference, the consequences of excess interfering crossovers on meiotic chromosome segregation are not well known. Here we show that extra interfering crossovers lead to a range of meiotic defects and we uncover mechanisms that counteract these errors. Using chromosomes that exhibit a high frequency of supernumerary crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans, we find that essential chromosomal structures are mispatterned in the presence of multiple crossovers, subjecting chromosomes to improper spindle forces and leading to defects in metaphase alignment. Additionally, the chromosomes with extra interfering crossovers often exhibited segregation defects in anaphase I, with a high incidence of chromatin bridges that sometimes created a tether between the chromosome and the first polar body. However, these anaphase I bridges were often able to resolve in a LEM-3 nuclease dependent manner, and chromosome tethers that persisted were frequently resolved during Meiosis II by a second mechanism that preferentially segregates the tethered sister chromatid into the polar body. Altogether these findings demonstrate that excess interfering crossovers can severely impact chromosome patterning and segregation, highlighting the importance of limiting the number of recombination events between homologous chromosomes for the proper execution of meiosis.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Chromatids/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Chromosome Positioning/genetics , Chromosomes/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Endodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Recombination, Genetic
16.
PLoS Genet ; 16(12): e1009272, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332358

ABSTRACT

The Betacoronaviruses comprise multiple subgenera whose members have been implicated in human disease. As with SARS, MERS and now SARS-CoV-2, the origin and emergence of new variants are often attributed to events of recombination that alter host tropism or disease severity. In most cases, recombination has been detected by searches for excessively similar genomic regions in divergent strains; however, such analyses are complicated by the high mutation rates of RNA viruses, which can produce sequence similarities in distant strains by convergent mutations. By applying a genome-wide approach that examines the source of individual polymorphisms and that can be tested against null models in which recombination is absent and homoplasies can arise only by convergent mutations, we examine the extent and limits of recombination in Betacoronaviruses. We find that recombination accounts for nearly 40% of the polymorphisms circulating in populations and that gene exchange occurs almost exclusively among strains belonging to the same subgenus. Although experimental studies have shown that recombinational exchanges occur at random along the coronaviral genome, in nature, they are vastly overrepresented in regions controlling viral interaction with host cells.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/classification , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Genes, Viral/genetics , Genome, Viral/genetics , Host Specificity/genetics , Models, Genetic , Polymorphism, Genetic , SARS-CoV-2/classification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Viral Tropism/genetics
17.
Genes Dev ; 29(20): 2183-202, 2015 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26494791

ABSTRACT

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes undergo crossover recombination, which is typically concentrated in narrow hot spots that are controlled by genetic and epigenetic information. Arabidopsis chromosomes are highly DNA methylated in the repetitive centromeres, which are also crossover-suppressed. Here we demonstrate that RNA-directed DNA methylation is sufficient to locally silence Arabidopsis euchromatic crossover hot spots and is associated with increased nucleosome density and H3K9me2. However, loss of CG DNA methylation maintenance in met1 triggers epigenetic crossover remodeling at the chromosome scale, with pericentromeric decreases and euchromatic increases in recombination. We used recombination mutants that alter interfering and noninterfering crossover repair pathways (fancm and zip4) to demonstrate that remodeling primarily involves redistribution of interfering crossovers. Using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, we show that crossover remodeling is driven by loss of CG methylation within the centromeric regions. Using cytogenetics, we profiled meiotic DNA double-strand break (DSB) foci in met1 and found them unchanged relative to wild type. We propose that met1 chromosome structure is altered, causing centromere-proximal DSBs to be inhibited from maturation into interfering crossovers. These data demonstrate that DNA methylation is sufficient to silence crossover hot spots and plays a key role in establishing domains of meiotic recombination along chromosomes.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis/genetics , Chromosomes, Plant/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Methylation , Epigenomics , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Arabidopsis/enzymology , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Centromere/genetics , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Mutation , Nucleosomes
18.
Genes Dev ; 29(18): 1969-79, 2015 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385965

ABSTRACT

The Caenorhabditis elegans gene rec-1 was the first genetic locus identified in metazoa to affect the distribution of meiotic crossovers along the chromosome. We report that rec-1 encodes a distant paralog of HIM-5, which was discovered by whole-genome sequencing and confirmed by multiple genome-edited alleles. REC-1 is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) in vitro, and mutation of the CDK consensus sites in REC-1 compromises meiotic crossover distribution in vivo. Unexpectedly, rec-1; him-5 double mutants are synthetic-lethal due to a defect in meiotic double-strand break formation. Thus, we uncovered an unexpected robustness to meiotic DSB formation and crossover positioning that is executed by HIM-5 and REC-1 and regulated by phosphorylation.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis/genetics
19.
Plant J ; 105(6): 1665-1676, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346910

ABSTRACT

Allopolyploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) carries three pairs of homoeologous genomes but its meiotic pairing is diploid-like. This is the effect of the Ph (pairing homoeologous) system which restricts chromosome pairing to strictly homologous. Ph1 is the locus with the strongest effect. Disabling Ph1 permits pairing between homoeologues and is routinely used in chromosome engineering to introgress alien variation into breeding stocks. Whereas the efficiency of Ph1 and the general pattern of homoeologous crossovers in its absence are quite well known from numerous studies, other characteristics of such crossovers remain unknown. This study analyzed the crossover points in four sets of the ph1b-induced recombinants between wheat homologues as well as between three wheat and rye (Secale cereale) homoeologous chromosome arms, and compared them to crossovers between homologues in a reference wheat population. The results show the Ph1 locus also controls crossing over of homologues, and the general patterns of homologous (with Ph1) and homoeologous (with ph1b) crossing over are the same. In all intervals analyzed, homoeologous crossovers fell within the range of frequency distribution of homologous crossovers among individual families of the reference population. No specific DNA sequence characteristics were identified that could be recognized by the Ph1 locus; the only difference between homologous and homoeologous crossing over appears to be in frequency. It is concluded that the Ph1 locus likely recognizes DNA sequence similarity; crossing over is permitted between very similar sequences. In the absence of Ph1 dissimilarities are ignored, in proportion to the level of the sequence divergence.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Plant/genetics , Secale/genetics , Triticum/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/genetics , Chromosome Pairing/physiology , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Plant Breeding
20.
Plant J ; 105(1): 197-208, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118252

ABSTRACT

For diploid organisms that are highly heterozygous, a phased haploid genome can greatly aid in functional genomic, population genetic and breeding studies. Based on the genome sequencing of 135 single sperm cells of the elite tea cultivar 'Fudingdabai', we herein phased the genome of Camellia sinensis, one of the most popular beverage crops worldwide. High-resolution genetic and recombination maps of Fudingdabai were constructed, which revealed that crossover (CO) positions were frequently located in the 5' and 3' ends of annotated genes, while CO distributions across the genome were random. The low CO frequency in tea can be explained by strong CO interference, and CO simulation revealed the proportion of interference insensitive CO ranged from 5.2% to 11.7%. We furthermore developed a method to infer the relatedness between tea accessions and detected complex kinship and genetic signatures of 106 tea accessions. Among them, 59 accessions were closely related with Fudingdabai and 31 of them were first-degree relatives. We additionally identified genes displaying allele specific expression patterns between the two haplotypes of Fudingdabai and genes displaying significantly differential expression levels between Fudingdabai and other haplotypes. These results lay the foundation for further investigation of genetic and epigenetic factors underpinning the regulation of gene expression and provide insights into the evolution of tea plants as well as a valuable genetic resource for future breeding efforts.


Subject(s)
Camellia sinensis/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Genome, Plant/genetics , Pollen/genetics , Alleles , Chromosome Mapping , Genes, Plant/genetics , Phylogeny
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL