Incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients who benefited from sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2007 to June 2021 were identified based on operative codes. Recurrent episodes were identified based on hospitalization codes and reviewed. Survival analysis was performed and was reported using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Follow-up was censored for last hospital visit and diverticulitis recurrence. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis after sigmoid colectomy. The review was registered into PROSPERO (CRD42021237003, 25/06/2021). RESULTS: One thousand three-hundred and fifty-six patients benefited from sigmoid colectomy. Four hundred and three were excluded, leaving 953 patients for inclusion. The mean age at time of sigmoid colectomy was 64.0 + / - 14.7 years. Four hundred and fifty-eight patients (48.1%) were males. Six hundred and twenty-two sigmoid colectomies (65.3%) were performed in the elective setting and 331 (34.7%) as emergency surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.8 + / - 4.1 years. During this period, 10 patients (1.1%) developed reccurent diverticulitis. Nine of these episodes were classified as Hinchey 1a, and one as Hinchey 1b. The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence (95% CI) was as follows: at 1 year: 0.37% (0.12-1.13%), at 5 years: 1.07% (0.50-2.28%), at 10 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%) and at 15 years: 2.14% (1.07-4.25%). Risk factors for recurrence could not be assessed by logistic regression due to the low number of incidental cases. The systematic review of the literature identified 15 observational studies reporting on the incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy, which ranged from 0 to 15% for a follow-up period ranging between 2 months and over 10 years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of diverticulitis recurrence after sigmoid colectomy is of 2.14% at 15 years, and is mostly composed of Hinchey 1a episodes. The incidences reported in the literature are heterogeneous.

Recurrence of diverticulitis after prophylactic sigmoidectomy: an underestimated problem?

AIM: Several papers have been published about the risk of recurrence after an attack of diverticulitis treated conservatively. However, very few papers have been devoted to the risk of postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis (PRD) after prophylactic sigmoidectomy (PS). The aim of this work was to report the rate of PRD after PS and to assess possible risk factors for recurrence after surgery. METHOD: All consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic PS for diverticulitis between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively included. PRD was assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty four patients (199 men, mean age 54 ± 13 years) were included. Among these, 26 (7%) presented with 1.7 ± 1 (range 1-4) episodes of recurrence of diverticulitis after a mean delay of 44 ± 39 months (1 month-11 years) after surgery. Patients who presented with postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis were younger (46 ± 11 vs. 55 ± 13 years, p = 0.002) and more frequently had uncomplicated diverticulitis [15/26 (58%) vs. 97/338 (29%), p = 0.002] and more than two previous episodes before PS [17/26 (65%) vs. 132/338 (39%), p = 0.009] than patients without PRD. After multivariate analysis, two independent risk factors for PRD were identified: patients with more than two episodes before PS (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.2-9, p = 0.005) and age < 50 years (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2-11, p = 0.001). If both factors were present, recurrence reached 18% (9/51). CONCLUSION: Postoperative recurrence of diverticulitis is rare (7%) after PS for diverticulitis. Some patients (i.e. those with more than two episodes before PS and/or age <50 years) could be exposed to a higher risk of recurrence (up to 18%), making prophylactic surgery questionable in these patients.

Conditional risk of diverticulitis after non-operative management.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe conditional recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients after an index episode of diverticulitis managed without surgery, and to estimate the difference in conditional RFS for diverticulitis according to specific risk factors. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including all patients managed without surgery for acute sigmoid diverticulitis at two university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Conditional RFS for diverticulitis was estimated over 10 years of follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed at the index episode and again 2 years later. RESULTS: In total, 991 patients were included for analysis. The 1, 2- and 3-year actuarial diverticulitis RFS rates were 81·1, 71·5 and 67·5 per cent respectively. Compared with the 1-year actuarial RFS rate of 81·1 per cent, the 1-year conditional RFS increased with each additional year survived recurrence-free, reaching 96·0 per cent after surviving the first 4 years recurrence-free. A similar phenomenon was observed for 2-year diverticulitis conditional RFS. Lower age (hazard ratio (HR) 0·98, 95 per cent c.i. 0·98 to 0·99), Charlson Co-morbidity Index score of 2 or above (HR 1·78, 1·32 to 2·39) and immunosuppression (HR 1·85, 1·38 to 2·48) were independently associated with recurrence of diverticulitis from the index episode. At 2 years from the index episode, immunosuppression was no longer associated with diverticulitis recurrence (HR 1·02, 0·50 to 2·09). CONCLUSION: The conditional RFS of patients with diverticulitis improved with each year that was survived recurrence-free. Although several factors at index presentation may be associated with early recurrence, the conditional probability of recurrence according to many of these risk factors converged with time.

ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la supervivencia condicional libre de recidiva de diverticulitis (diverticulitis recurrence-free survival, Div-RFS) en pacientes tras un episodio de diverticulitis tratado de forma conservadora, y calcular la diferencia en la Div-RFS condicional de acuerdo con factores de riesgo específicos. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico que incluyó a todos los pacientes tratados de forma no quirúrgica por diverticulitis sigmoidea aguda en dos hospitales afiliados a la universidad en Montreal, Quebec, Canadá. La supervivencia condicional libre de recidiva de la diverticulitis se calculó durante 10 años de seguimiento. Se realizó un análisis mediante un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox en el episodio índice y nuevamente 2 años después. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron 991 pacientes en el análisis. La Div-RFS actuarial a 1, 2 y 3 años fue del 81,1%, 71,5% y 67,5%, respectivamente. En comparación con la Div-RFS actuarial a 1 año del 81,1%, la Div-RFS condicional a 1 año aumentó con cada año adicional sobrevivido sin recidiva, alcanzando el 96,0% después de sobrevivir los primeros 4 años sin recidiva. Se observó un fenómeno similar para Div-RFS condicional a los 2 años. Una menor edad (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR: 0,98; i.c. del 95%: 0,98 a 0,99), la puntuación de comorbilidad de Charlson ≥ 2 (HR: 1,78; i.c. del 95%: 1,32 a 2,39) y la inmunosupresión (HR: 1,85; i.c. del 95%: 1,38 a 2,48) se asociaron de forma independiente con la recidiva de la diverticulitis desde el episodio índice. En la regresión de Cox a los 2 años del episodio índice, la inmunosupresión ya no se asoció con recidiva de diverticulitis (HR: 1,02; i.c. del 95% 0,50-2,09). CONCLUSIÓN: La Div-RFS condicional mejoró con cada año de supervivencia sin recidiva. Si bien varios factores en la presentación del episodio índice pueden estar asociados con una recidiva precoz, la probabilidad condicional de recidiva en relación con muchos de estos factores de riesgo coincidió con el tiempo.

Novel swine model of colonic diverticulosis.

The pathophysiology of colonic diverticulosis has not been completely understood. The development of appropriate animal models is essential to study diverticular disease. To date, no large animal models are available for this disease condition. The objective of this study was to develop a swine model by damaging the colon wall, combined with or without a low-fiber diet to mimic the pathogenesis of diverticulosis. To create a weakness on the colon wall, collagenase was applied in vivo to degrade the collagen in the colon wall. Three groups of Yucatan minipigs were included. Group 1 (n = 12) underwent collagenase injection (CI) with a low-fiber diet for 6 mo, group 2 (n = 8) underwent CI alone with a standard swine diet for 6 mo, and group 3 (n = 12) received a low-fiber diet alone for 6 mo. We found that diverticulosis occurred in 91.7% (11 of 12) of pigs in the CI + diet group and 100% (8 of 8) in CI-alone group. Moreover, around 30-75% of colon CI spots for each pig developed diverticular lesions. Diet alone for 6 mo did not induce diverticulosis. The endoscopic and histological examinations revealed the formation of multiple wide-mouthed diverticular lesions along the descending colon. Our results provide convincing evidence of the high efficacy of the reduced colon wall strength caused by CI in the development of a swine model of diverticulosis. Low-fiber diet consumption for 6 mo had no influence on the generation time or incidence rate of diverticulosis. In this model, digestion of the collagen in the colonic wall is sufficient to cause diverticulosis. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Effective large animal models of diverticulosis are currently lacking for the study of diverticular disease. This study marks the first time that a swine model of diverticulosis was developed by damaging colon wall structure, combined with or without a low-fiber diet. We found that a defect of colon wall could result in colon diverticular lesions within 6 mo in swine. This animal model mimicking the pathological process of diverticulosis is of great clinical value.

Distinct Clinical Factors in Hospitalized Patients with Diverticular Bleeding and Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear why colonic diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis rarely coexist. This study compared the characteristics of these conditions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined 310 consecutive patients hospitalized with an episode of diverticular disease (cases) and outpatients without a diverticular episode (controls) from January 2012 to December 2015. We investigated distinct clinical factors in hospitalized patients with diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis. RESULTS: We identified 183 patients with 263 episodes of diverticular bleeding and 127 patients with 135 episodes of diverticulitis during the study period. Patients with diverticular bleeding were significantly older than those with diverticulitis (median age 76 vs. 56 years) and had more cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, lipid disorder, or a poorer performance status. Significantly more diverticular bleeding patients were taking antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant drugs, proton pump inhibitors, or laxative agents. Multivariate analysis revealed that an age > 65 years (OR 5.42), and antiplatelet agent use (OR 7.29) were more significant risk factors for diverticular bleeding than for diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people using antiplatelet drugs may be more susceptible to diverticular bleeding than diverticulitis.

Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.

Acute colonic diverticulitis is a gastrointestinal condition frequently encountered by primary care practitioners, hospitalists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists. Clinical presentation ranges from mild abdominal pain to peritonitis with sepsis. It can often be diagnosed on the basis of clinical features alone, but imaging is necessary in more severe presentations to rule out such complications as abscess and perforation. Treatment depends on the severity of the presentation, presence of complications, and underlying comorbid conditions. Medical and surgical treatment algorithms are evolving. This article provides an evidence-based, clinically relevant overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of acute diverticulitis.

Meat intake and risk of diverticulitis among men.

OBJECTIVE: Diverticulitis is a common disease with a substantial clinical and economic burden. Besides dietary fibre, the role of other foods in the prevention of diverticulitis is underexplored. DESIGN: We prospectively examined the association between consumption of meat (total red meat, red unprocessed meat, red processed meat, poultry and fish) with risk of incident diverticulitis among 46 461 men enrolled in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2012). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: During 651 970 person-years of follow-up, we documented 764 cases of incident diverticulitis. Compared with men in the lowest quintile (Q1) of total red meat consumption, men in the highest quintile (Q5) had a multivariable RR of 1.58 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.11; p for trend=0.01). The increase in risk was non-linear, plateauing after six servings per week (p for non-linearity=0.002). The association was stronger for unprocessed red meat (RR for Q5 vs Q1: 1.51; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.03; p for trend=0.03) than for processed red meat (RR for Q5 vs Q1: 1.03; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.35; p for trend=0.26). Higher consumption of poultry or fish was not associated with risk of diverticulitis. However, the substitution of poultry or fish for one serving of unprocessed red meat per day was associated with a decrease in risk of diverticulitis (multivariable RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Red meat intake, particularly unprocessed red meat, was associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis. The findings provide practical dietary guidance for patients at risk of diverticulitis.

Newly developed endoscopic detachable snare ligation therapy for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: a multicenter phase II trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously reported preliminary safety results for a new method, endoscopic detachable snare ligation (EDSL), for diverticular hemorrhage. This method does not need endoscope removal to attach a ligation device after detection of the bleeding site. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDSL in a larger patient population. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in 12 institutions. Patients suspected of having diverticular hemorrhage without serious systemic disease were enrolled. The primary endpoint was early (within 30 days) recurrent bleeding rate in patients treated with EDSL. The secondary endpoints were overall early recurrent bleeding rate in patients with definite diverticular bleeding and adverse events in patients treated with EDSL. RESULTS: From June 2015 to March 2017, bleeding diverticula were detected in 123 of 205 enrolled patients (60%), of whom 101 (82%) were treated with EDSL. Most patients (20/22) in whom EDSL was not successful were treated with clipping. The early recurrent bleeding rate was 7.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6%-13.2%; 8/101) in patients who could be treated with EDSL. The median total endoscopic and EDSL procedure time was 40 minutes (interquartile range, 15-71) and 4 minutes (interquartile range, 1-7), respectively. Two mild adverse events, colonic diverticulitis and temporary abdominal pain, were observed. CONCLUSION: EDSL was confirmed to be useful and safe for treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000001858.).

Colonoscopy-induced acute diverticulitis: myth or reality?

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy in patients with diverticulosis can be technically challenging and limited data exist relating to the risk of post-colonoscopy diverticulitis. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence, management, and outcomes of acute diverticulitis following colonoscopy. METHODS: Study design is retrospective cohort study. Data were gathered by conducting an automated search of the electronic patient database using current procedural terminology and ICD-9 codes. Patients who underwent a colonoscopy from 2003 to 2012 were reviewed to find patients who developed acute diverticulitis within 30 days after colonoscopy. Patient demographics and colonoscopy-related outcomes were documented, which include interval between colonoscopy and diverticulitis, colonoscopy indication, simultaneous colonoscopic interventions, and follow-up after colonoscopy. RESULTS: From 236,377 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 68 patients (mean age 56 years) developed post-colonoscopy diverticulitis (0.029%; 2.9 per 10,000 colonoscopies). Incomplete colonoscopies were more frequent among patients with a history of previous diverticulitis [n = 10 (29%) vs. n = 3 (9%), p = 0.03]. Mean time to develop diverticulitis after colonoscopy was 12 ± 8 days, and 30 (44%) patients required hospitalization. 34 (50%) patients had a history of diverticulitis prior to colonoscopy. Among those patients, 14 underwent colonoscopy with an indication of surveillance for previous disease. When colonoscopy was performed within 6 weeks of a diverticulitis attack, surgical intervention was required more often when compared with colonoscopies performed after 6 weeks of an acute attack [n = 6 (100%) vs. n = 10 (36%), p = 0.006]. 6 (9%) out of 68 patients received emergency surgical treatment. 15 (24%) out of 62 patients who had non-surgical treatment initially underwent an elective sigmoidectomy at a later date. Recurrent diverticulitis developed in 16 (23%) patients after post-colonoscopy diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Post-colonoscopy diverticulitis is a rare, but potentially serious complication. Although a rare entity, possibility of this complication should be kept in mind in patients presenting with symptoms after colonoscopy.

Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis: Low Stoma Rate Using a "Damage Control Strategy".

PURPOSE: Optimal surgical management of perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon has yet to be clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of a "Damage Control Strategy" (DCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon complicated by generalized peritonitis (Hinchey III and IV) surgically treated according to a damage control strategy between May 2011 and February 2017 were enrolled in the present multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were collected at three surgical centers. DCS comprises a two-stage concept: [1] limited resection of the perforated colon segment with oral and aboral blind closure during the emergency procedure and [2] definitive reconstruction at scheduled second laparotomy (anastomosis ∓ loop ileostomy or a Hartmann's procedure) after 24-48 h. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included into the analysis [W:M 28:30, median age 70.1 years (30-92)]. Eleven patients (19%) initially presented with fecal peritonitis (Hinchey IV) and 47 patients with purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III). An anastomosis could be created during the second procedure in 48 patients (83%), 14 of those received an additional loop ileostomy. In the remaining ten patients (n = 17%), an end colostomy was created at second laparotomy. A fecal diversion was performed in five patients to treat anastomotic complications. Thus, altogether, 29 patients (50%) had stoma at the end of the hospital stay. The postoperative mortality was 9% (n = 5), and median postoperative hospital stay was 18.5 days (3-66). At the end of the follow-up, 44 of 53 surviving patients were stoma free (83%). CONCLUSION: The use of the Damage Control strategy leads to a comparatively low stoma rate in patients suffering from perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.

Management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of predictors of treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is a common complication of diverticular disease of the colon. While complicated diverticulitis often warrants intervention, acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) is usually managed conservatively. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conservative treatment of AUD without antibiotics compared to standard antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature review in compliance with PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched. Studies that assessed efficacy and safety of treatment of AUD without antibiotics were included. Outcome parameters were rates of treatment failure, recurrence of diverticulitis, complications and mortality, readmission to hospital, and need for surgery. RESULTS: Nine studies including 2565 patients were included to the review. Of these patients, 65.1% were treated conservatively without antibiotics. Treatment failure was observed in 5.1% of patients not-given-antibiotic treatment versus 3.4% of those given antibiotic treatment. Recurrent diverticulitis occurred in 9.3% of patients in the non-antibiotic group versus 12.1% of patients in the antibiotic group. On meta-analysis of the studies, there were no significant differences between non-antibiotic and antibiotic treatment groups regarding rates of treatment failure (OR = 1.5, p = 0.06), recurrence of diverticulitis (OR = 0.81, p = 0.2), complications (OR = 0.56, p = 0.25), readmission rates (OR = 0.97, p = 0.91), need for surgery (OR = 0.59, p = 0.28), and mortality (OR = 0.64, p = 0.47). The only variable that was significantly associated with treatment failure in the non-antibiotic treatment group was associated comorbidities (standard error (SE) = - 0.07, 95% CI - 0.117 - 0.032; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of AUD without antibiotics is feasible, safe, and effective. Adding broad-spectrum antibiotics to the treatment regimen did not serve to decrease treatment failure, recurrence, complications, hospital readmissions, and need for surgery significantly compared to non-antibiotic treatment.

Diverticular Disease: Traditional and Evolving Paradigms.

Diverticular disease includes diverticulosis, which are sac protrusions of the intestinal mucosa, and diverticulitis, inflammation of the diverticula. Diverticular disease is listed as one of the top 10 leading physician diagnoses for gastrointestinal disorders in outpatient clinic visits in the United States. There are several classifications of diverticular disease ranging from asymptomatic diverticulosis to diverticulitis with complications. Several theories are linked to the development of diverticula which includes the physiology of the colon itself, collagen cross-linking, and recently challenged, low-fiber intake. The differential diagnoses of lower abdominal pain in addition to diverticular disease have overlapping signs and symptoms, which can make a diagnosis challenging. Identification of the distinct signs and symptoms of each classification will assist the practitioner in making the correct diagnosis and lead to appropriate management. The findings from recent studies have changed the paradigm of diverticular disease. The purpose of this article is to discuss traditional dogma and evolving concepts in the pathophysiology, prevention, and management of diverticular disease. Practitioners must be knowledgeable about diverticular disease for improved outcomes.

Changing theories on the pathogenesis and risk factors for diverticulitis.

Diverticulitis was thought to be a simple complication of an even simpler disease (diverticulosis), but may in fact result from an entirely new set of complex pathologies. Considering diverticulitis is increasing in annual incidence and becoming more prevalent in younger populations, the implications of appropriate management become more vital than ever. This article reviews old and new understandings of diverticulitis and current recommendations for prevention and clinical management.

Dietary pattern and colonic diverticulosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To assess the role of dietary pattern on the occurrence of colonic diverticulosis, diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis. RECENT FINDINGS: High-fiber diet does not prevent diverticulosis occurrence, and results about prevention/treatment of diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis are still conflicting.No association was seen between nut, corn or popcorn consumption and occurrence of diverticulosis, diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis.It seems to be a mild association between high alcohol intake and diverticulosis occurrence, whereas alcohol dependence seems to show lower risk of in-hospital mortality due to acute diverticulitis.Higher red-meat consumption shows mild increased risk of acute diverticulitis, especially when consumed as unprocessed red meat (defined as consumption of 'beef or lamb as main dish', 'pork as main dish', 'hamburger' and 'beef, pork or lamb as a sandwich or mixed dish'); higher consumption of poultry (viz. white meat) was not associated with risk of acute diverticulitis.Finally, higher fish intake was associated with reduced risk of diverticulitis in age-adjusted model, but not after further adjustment for other potential confounders. SUMMARY: Current literature data about the role of dietary pattern on the occurrence of colonic diverticulosis, diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis are still too conflicting.

Risk of infection following colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients.

Background and study aims Previous studies describing the incidence of infection after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are limited. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of infection, and to propose a nomogram to predict the probability of infection following colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients. Patients and methods A nationwide retrospective study was conducted by analyzing the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The incidence of infection within 30 days after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was assessed and compared with a control group matched at a ratio of 1:1 based on age, sex, and the date of examination. Results In all, 112 543 patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and 112 543 matched patients who did not undergo these procedures were included. The overall incidence of infection within 30 days after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy was 0.37 %, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.04 %; P < 0.001). Diverticulitis, peritonitis, and appendicitis were the most common infections. Patients who underwent colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy had a 9.38-fold risk of infection (95 % confidence interval, 6.81 - 12.93; P < 0.001) compared with the control group. The predicted infection-free rates of the nomogram were closely aligned with the actual infection-free rates, with a bootstrapping concordance index of 0.763. Conclusions Colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy are associated with an increased risk of infection, which may occur after these procedures. Our nomogram may provide clinicians with an easy tool to evaluate the risk of infection after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in symptomatic patients.

Type I/type III collagen ratio associated with diverticulitis of the colon in young patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of diverticulitis in young patients is rising, whereas the type I:III collagen ratio of the colon decreases with age. Perhaps a lower type I:III collagen ratio in younger patients may predispose these patients to the development of the disease. METHOD: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the collagen content and type I:III collagen ratio in patients with diverticulitis versus a control group. Patients who underwent a colon resection were identified. Three groups of patients were created for analysis: those with diverticulitis aged <50 y, >50 y, and a control group. Tissue samples were stained with Sirius red/fast green and photographed. Photos analysis was performed to quantify the amount of type I collagen and type III collagen. The type I:III collagen ratio was calculated for each patient and compared. RESULTS: The quantity of type I collagen and type III collagen was higher in patients with diverticulitis aged >50 y (P = 0.04 and P < 0.0001, respectively); however, the collagen ratio was greatest in those patients with diverticulitis aged <50 y (P = 0.01). Further analysis demonstrated a significant higher type I:III ratio in all patients aged less than 50 y compared with all patients aged over 50 y (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that diverticulitis in the younger patient was not associated with a lower type I:III collagen ratio. It appears that the decrease in collagen ratio of the colon with age is associated with an increase in type III collagen deposition.

Risk factors for recurrence after acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Several factors may influence the risk of recurrence after an episode of acute colonic diverticulitis. Until now, a comprehensive systematic overview and evaluation of relevant risk factors have not been presented. This review aimed at assembling and evaluating current evidence on risk factors for recurrence after conservatively treated acute colonic diverticulitis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies evaluating risk factors for recurrence after acute diverticulitis treated non-surgically defined as antibiotic treatment, percutaneous abscess drainage, or by observation. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies were included. Analyzed outcome variables were extracted and grouped. No meta-analysis was performed due to low inter-study comparability. Variables were rated according to their likelihood of causing recurrence (no/low, medium, high). RESULTS: Of 1153 screened records, 35 studies were included, enrolling 396,676 patients with acute diverticulitis. A total of 50,555 patients experienced recurrences. Primary diverticulitis with abscess formation and young age increased the risk of recurrence. Readmission risk was higher within the first year after remission. In addition, the risk of subsequent diverticulitis more than doubled after two earlier episodes of diverticulitis and the risk increased further for every episode. CONCLUSIONS: The best treatment strategy for recurrent diverticulitis is undetermined. However, the risk of a new recurrence seemed to increase after each recurrence making elective resection a viable option at some point after multiple recurrences depending on patient risk factors and preferences.

Severity of diverticulitis in patients with polycystic kidney disease without transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) who have had a kidney transplant have an increased risk of diverticular disease and complicated diverticulitis. Literature is limited regarding the severity of diverticulitis in patients with PKD who have not had a transplant. We aim to assess whether patients with PKD, with and without renal transplant, have a similar course of diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of all adult PKD patients at our institution diagnosed with diverticulitis between 2000 and 2016 was conducted. Patients without documented PKD and diverticulitis were excluded. We compared PKD patients with and without renal transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were identified. Mean age was 60 (± 12), and 56% were female. Fourteen patients had undergone renal transplantation. Five (19%) non-transplant patients had complicated diverticulitis, compared to 43% (n = 6) transplanted (p = 0.33). Fifteen (56%) non-transplant and 8 (57%) transplant patients had recurrent diverticulitis (p = 1.00). Three (11%) non-transplant and 5 (36%) transplanted patients had recurrent complicated diverticulitis. Eight (30%) non-transplant and 7 (50%) transplant patients underwent surgery (p = 0.31). All 8 non-transplant patients underwent sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis without diversion. In the transplant group, 3 Hartmann procedures and 1 sigmoid resection with and 3 without diversion were performed. There was one in-hospital death in each group. CONCLUSION: In our group of patients, there was no difference in rate of recurrent diverticulitis, diverticulitis complications, or operative intervention in patients with PKD with and without renal transplant. The renal transplant group had a higher rate of recurrent, complicated diverticulitis.

Do Appendicitis and Diverticulitis Share a Common Pathological Link?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between appendicitis and diverticulitis. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: This study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: We examined the rate of appendectomy among 4 cohorts of patients: 1) patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy, 2) inpatients with medically treated diverticulitis, 3) patients who underwent left-sided colectomy for diverticulitis, and 4) patients who underwent colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the appendectomy rate. RESULTS: We studied a total of 928 patients in this study. There were no differences in the patient characteristics of smoking status, nonsteroidal use, or history of irritable bowel syndrome across the 4 study groups. Patients with surgically treated diverticulitis had significantly more episodes of diverticulitis (2.8 ± 1.9) than the medically treated group (1.4 ± 0.8) (p < 0.0001). The rate of appendectomy was 8.2% for the diverticulosis control group, 13.5% in the cancer group, 23.5% in the medically treated diverticulitis group, and 24.5% in the surgically treated diverticulitis group (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for demographics and other clinical risk factors, patients with diverticulitis had 2.8 times higher odds of previous appendectomy (p < 0.001) than the control groups. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design is associated with selection, documentation, and recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal significantly higher appendectomy rates in patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis, medically or surgically managed, in comparison with patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis. Therefore, we propose that appendicitis and diverticulitis share similar risk factors and potentially a common pathological link.

Long-term follow-up of lung transplant recipients supports non-operative treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the incidence, current treatment, and outcome of diverticulitis in highly immunosuppressed lung transplant recipients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 403 lung transplant recipients transplanted between 1992 and 2013 with a mean follow-up of 100 months (SD 58.0). RESULTS: 4.46% of lung transplant recipients (n=18) developed diverticulitis. Eight lung transplant recipients developed uncomplicated diverticulitis, which were all treated successfully with antibiotics. Three patients (37.5%) underwent elective sigmoid resection with severe Grade 3b complications after two of five (40%) surgical procedures. Diverticulitis recurrence occurred in five patients (60%). In total, 10 lung transplant recipients presented with 11 episodes of perforated diverticulitis with a 30-day mortality rate of 9.1%. Hartmann procedure was performed in eight lung transplant recipients. Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis and protective ileostomy was performed in three patients with Hinchey I. Two of these patients developed anastomotic leakage with a secondary Hartmann procedure. CONCLUSION: Due to high leakage rate after resection with primary anastomosis and protective ileostomy in our cohort of lung transplant recipients with perforated diverticulitis, the Hartmann procedure seems to be the safer option. In contrast, in uncomplicated diverticulitis, non-operative treatment can be considered as a safe and highly successful treatment option, even for recurrences.