Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 231
Filter
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 38(8): 1001-1022, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584422

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effects optokinetic stimulation in people with vestibular disorders, with a specific focus on people with visually induced dizziness. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted using three electronic databases, CINAHL, PubMed and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), from 2000 up to February 2024. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials were included, which compared: (a) adults above 18 years old with vestibular disorders, (b) the study evaluated interventions using optokinetic stimulation, (c) the intervention was compared with usual care; placebo or to no intervention, (d) the study included at least one outcome measure evaluating vestibular symptoms and (e) published in English. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and PROSPERO's registration number ID: CRD42021273382). RESULTS: Eleven randomised control trials, reported in 12 records, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of the studies were considered to have 'good' methodological quality according to the PEDro scale. All studies showed significant improvement in vestibular symptoms in both the intervention and control groups. A meta-analysis performed on six of the records found a preference towards the addition of OKS to conventional vestibular rehabilitation helped to further reduce dizziness symptoms for patients, but the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: No optimal duration or frequency for OKS has been determined. The addition of OKS to conventional vestibular rehabilitation may be beneficial in further improving vestibular symptoms in patients with dizziness. OKS could help to improve enjoyment and adherence to vestibular rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Photic Stimulation , Vestibular Diseases , Humans , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Dizziness/etiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/complications
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(6): 2861-2869, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127098

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) for management of patients with persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) utilizing subjective and objectives outcome measures and to study the effect of degree of both anxiety and depression in patients on the response of vestibular rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: Thirty-three PPPD patients participated in this study. Selection of patients was based on the diagnostic criteria for PPPD stated by Barany society in the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (2017). Every patient was subjected to history taking, anxiety and depression assessment, Arabic version of Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and sensory organization test (SOT). All patients received vestibular rehabilitations therapy. Assessment of VRT outcome was conducted after 6 weeks of VRT. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 40.9 ± 16.3 years, and nearly equal gender distribution. Vestibular migraine was the most precipitating condition (24.2%) in patients with PPPD. (39.4%) of patients had abnormal scores of anxiety and depression tests, all patients had from moderate to severe degrees of handicap caused by dizziness as measured by DHI, most of patients had abnormal findings in all conditions of SOT. After vestibular rehabilitation therapy, DHI and SOT scores showed significant improvement after VRT. More improvement was found among the group with no anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: VRT were effective in improving balance abnormalities in patients with PPPD evidenced by subjectively by DHI scores and objectively by SOT results. PPPD patients with concomitant psychiatric disorders; anxiety and depression experienced the least degree of improvement.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Dizziness , Vestibular Diseases , Humans , Female , Male , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/psychology , Adult , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/complications , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Vestibular Diseases/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Postural Balance/physiology , Aged , Exercise Therapy/methods , Young Adult
3.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(10)2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793883

ABSTRACT

Dizziness can be a debilitating condition with various causes, with at least one episode reported in 17% to 30% of the international adult population. Given the effectiveness of rehabilitation in treating dizziness and the recent advancements in telerehabilitation, this systematic review aims to investigate the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the treatment of this disorder. The search, conducted across Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro databases, included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of telerehabilitation interventions, delivered synchronously, asynchronously, or via tele-support/monitoring. Primary outcomes focused on dizziness frequency/severity and disability, with secondary outcomes assessing anxiety and depression measures. Seven articles met the eligibility criteria, whereas five articles contributed to the meta-analysis. Significant findings were observed regarding the frequency and severity of dizziness (mean difference of 3.01, p < 0.001), disability (mean difference of -4.25, p < 0.001), and anxiety (standardized mean difference of -0.16, p = 0.02), favoring telerehabilitation. Telerehabilitation shows promise as a treatment for dizziness, aligning with the positive outcomes seen in traditional rehabilitation studies. However, the effectiveness of different telerehabilitation approaches requires further investigation, given the moderate methodological quality and the varied nature of existing methods and programs.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Telerehabilitation , Humans , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Anxiety , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(7): 3075-3086, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36947249

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) interventional programs as a vestibular rehabilitative method for patients with uncompensated peripheral vestibular disorders. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Cochrane Library were used (up to July 2021). Studies selected in this study were controlled trials in which virtual reality was used as vestibular rehabilitative therapy in comparison to any other vestibular rehabilitative methods or medical or dietary recommendations. Comparison was made in at least one of these outcomes measures; Subjective measures such as Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance Confidence questionnaire, Dizziness Analogue Scale or Visual Analogue Scale, besides objective measures as posturography. Six articles were included in the meta-analysis; tested for heterogeneity of the estimates using chi-squared and I2 tests, outcomes were expressed as mean difference and 95% CI. Estimates from included studies were pooled using the random-effect model. RESULTS: virtual reality as a vestibular rehabilitative intervention was able to improve scores of Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form questionnaire, Visual Analogue sale and posturography as outcome measures of vestibular rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: virtual reality has a potential clinical benefit for vestibular rehabilitation in peripheral vestibular dysfunction compared with conventional vestibular rehabilitation methods. However, further research is needed to document the exact parameters of an optimal protocol for virtual reality rehabilitation, the period needed for effective rehabilitation and its side effects.


Subject(s)
Vestibular Diseases , Virtual Reality , Humans , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Postural Balance , Vertigo
5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(6): 102609, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32615473

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study investigated the feasibility of acceptance and commitment therapy for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness and preliminarily verified the long-term effectiveness of the therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study implemented the within-group pre-post comparison design. We enrolled 27 adult patients who met the criteria of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. They underwent a treatment program including acceptance and commitment therapy combined with vestibular rehabilitation once a week for a total of six sessions. The primary outcome was changes in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory score 6 months posttreatment. RESULTS: All 27 patients completed the acceptance and commitment therapy + vestibular rehabilitation program, and 25 patients (92.6%) could be followed for 6 months posttreatment. For 27 participants, the scores from pretreatment to 6 months posttreatment significantly declined (P < .001), and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory effect size was 1.11 (95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.42). At 6 months posttreatment, 11 patients (40.7%) achieved remission (the score ≤ 14), 16 (59.3%) achieved treatment response (reduction in the score ≥ 18), and 20 (74.1%) achieved remission and/or treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance and commitment therapy is feasible for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness and might have long-term effectiveness. However, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.


Subject(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/methods , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Dizziness/therapy , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Pilot Projects , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/therapy , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Dizziness/etiology , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Motion Perception/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Diseases/complications
6.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 277(1): 103-113, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31637477

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with acute peripheral unilateral hypofunction (UVH) complain of vertigo and dizziness and show posture imbalance and gaze instability. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VR) enhances the functional recovery and it has been shown that gaze stabilization exercises improved the dynamic visual acuity (DVA). Whether the effects of VR depend or not on the moment when it is applied remains however unknown, and investigation on how the recovery mechanisms could depend or not on the timing of VR has not yet been tested. METHODS: Our study investigated the recovery of DVA in 28 UVH patients whose unilateral deficit was attested by clinical history and video head impulse test (vHIT). Patients were tested under passive conditions before (pre-tests) and after (post-tests) being subjected to an active DVA rehabilitation protocol. The DVA protocol consisted in active gaze stabilization exercises with two training sessions per week, each lasting 30 min, during four weeks. Patients were sub-divided into three groups depending on the time delay between onset of acute UVH and beginning of VR. The early DVA group (N = 10) was composed of patients receiving the DVA protocol during the first 2 weeks after onset (mean = 8.9 days), the late group 1 (N = 9) between the 3rd and the 4th week (mean = 27.5 days after) and the late group 2 (N = 9) after the 1st month (mean: 82.5 days). We evaluated the DVA score, the angular aVOR gain, the directional preponderance and the percentage of compensatory saccades during the HIT, and the subjective perception of dizziness with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). The pre- and post-VR tests were performed with passive head rotations done by the physiotherapist in the plane of the horizontal and vertical canals. RESULTS: The results showed that patients submitted to an early DVA rehab improved significantly their DVA score by increasing their passive aVOR gain and decreasing the percentage of compensatory saccades, while the late 1 and late 2 DVA groups 1 and 2 showed less DVA improvement and an inverse pattern, with no change in the aVOR gain and an increase in the percentage of compensatory saccades. All groups of patients exhibited significant reductions of the DHI score, with higher improvement in subjective perception of dizziness handicap in the patients receiving the DVA rehab protocol in the first month. CONCLUSION: Our data provide the first demonstration in UVH patients that earlier is better to improve DVA and passive aVOR gain. Gaze stabilization exercises would benefit from the plastic events occurring in brain structures during a sensitive period or opportunity time window to elaborate optimal functional reorganizations. This result is potentially very important for the VR programs to restore the aVOR gain instead of recruiting compensatory saccades assisting gaze stability.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Vestibular Neuronitis/rehabilitation , Visual Acuity/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Female , Fixation, Ocular/physiology , Head Impulse Test , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postural Balance/physiology , Recovery of Function , Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular/physiology , Saccades/physiology , Vertigo/etiology , Vertigo/physiopathology , Vertigo/rehabilitation , Vestibular Neuronitis/complications , Vestibular Neuronitis/diagnosis , Vestibular Neuronitis/physiopathology
7.
Curr Opin Neurol ; 32(1): 137-144, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30461465

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rehabilitation for persons with vertigo and balance disorders is becoming commonplace and the literature is expanding rapidly. The present review highlights recent findings of both peripheral and central vestibular disorders and provides insight into evidence related to new rehabilitative interventions. Risk factors will be reviewed to create a better understanding of patient and clinical characteristics that may effect recovery among persons with vestibular disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical practice guidelines have recently been developed for peripheral vestibular hypofunction and updated for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Diagnoses such as persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) and vestibular migraine are now defined, and there is growing literature supporting the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation as a treatment option. As technology advances, virtual reality and other technologies are being used more frequently to augment vestibular rehabilitation. Clinicians now have a better understanding of rehabilitation expectations and whom to refer based on evidence in order to improve functional outcomes for persons living with peripheral and central vestibular disorders. SUMMARY: An up-to-date understanding of the evidence related to vestibular rehabilitation can assist the practicing clinician in making better clinical decisions for their patient and hopefully result in optimal functional recovery.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Humans , Postural Balance/physiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vertigo/physiopathology , Vertigo/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology
8.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 276(10): 2681-2689, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31187238

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Vestibular schwannoma removal causes unilateral vestibular deafferentation, which results in dizziness and postural unsteadiness. Vertigo and balance problems together are among the most important aspects affecting quality of life. Intensive vestibular rehabilitation, which starts before surgery, with following postsurgical supervised rehabilitation, using visual biofeedback propose an instrument to accelerate a recovery process. Another option how to accelerate the vestibular compensation, is employment of presurgical gentamicin ablation together with vestibular rehabilitation (prehabilitation) of vestibular function. Purpose of present study was to examine the dynamics of vestibular compensation process using supervised intensive vestibular rehabilitation with visual biofeedback in the short-term postsurgical period. The second aim was to compare both studied groups mainly to evaluate if prehabilitation has potential to accelerate the compensation process in the early postoperative course. METHODS: The study included 52 patients who underwent the retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma removal. They were divided into two groups. The first group was prehabilitated with intratympanic application of gentamicin before surgery to cause unilateral vestibular loss (14 patients), the second group (38 patients) was treated in standard protocol without prehabilitation. All patients underwent at home vestibular training before surgery to learn new movement patterns. Following the surgery supervised intensive vestibular rehabilitation including visual biofeedback was employed daily in both groups between the 5th and 14th postoperative day. Outcome measurements included an evaluation of subjective visual vertical (SVV), posturography and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC). ANOVA for repeated measurements was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We observed significant improvement in SVV (p < 0.05), posturography parameters (p < 0.05) and ABC scores (p < 0.05) with postoperative rehabilitation program following surgery in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between group treated by prehabilitation and group without prehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study showed that intensive postsurgical rehabilitation represents key factor in compensation process following retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma surgery. Prehabilitation did not speed up recovery process.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Otologic Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Vertigo , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Otologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Postoperative Complications/rehabilitation , Premedication/methods , Treatment Outcome , Vertigo/etiology , Vertigo/rehabilitation
9.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(6): 399-406, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31362829

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of 2 treatments for patients with dizziness after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who demonstrate abnormal cervical spine proprioception (CSP). METHODS: A retrospective records review was conducted on the medical charts of patients treated for dizziness after mTBI who received either standard care (vestibular rehabilitation therapy [VRT]) or cervical spine proprioceptive retraining (CSPR) from 2009 to 2013. All patients included in the analysis were active-duty military with recurring dizziness after mTBI who had at least 1 abnormal CSP test. Patients were excluded for dizziness with a clear peripheral vestibular or central symptom origin, incomplete data, or no CSP assessment, or if both treatments were administered. Forty-eight total patients were included in the final dataset (22 VRT; 26 CSPR). Traditional VRT was compared with CSPR when abnormal CSP tests were present, regardless of the presence or absence of neck pain. A clinician review of records was used to determine improvement of dizziness based on patient reports of symptoms at discharge evaluation (ie, no symptoms for at least 2 weeks). RESULTS: Patients who received CSPR were 30 times more likely to report improvement in dizziness symptoms compared with those who received VRT (adjusted odds ratio: 30.12; 95% confidence interval 4.44-204.26, P < .001) when abnormal CSP tests were present. Patients with dizziness over 1 year were significantly less likely to improve. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with dizziness after mTBI and who had abnormal CSP assessments responded better to CSPR compared with those who received VRT.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/rehabilitation , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Proprioception , Adult , Brain Concussion/complications , Dizziness/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Military Personnel , Retrospective Studies , United States
10.
Pediatr Phys Ther ; 31(4): E20-E25, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31469774

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A case study of a 12-year-old boy with Irlen syndrome illustrates the overlapping symptoms of Irlen syndrome and vestibular-related dizziness. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: Individuals with Irlen syndrome have eyestrain and headache, and often report visual perceptual distortions of blurring, doubling, and movement of print on the page. These symptoms can be relieved with the use of individually prescribed tinted lenses or overlays. Visually induced dizziness, also known as visual vertigo, is characterized by dizziness and/or unsteadiness that is triggered by complex, distorted, large field/moving visual stimuli. Visually induced dizziness can be effectively treated with progressive, controlled exposure to optokinetic visual stimuli. The child with Irlen syndrome had impaired balance, impaired gaze stability, and symptoms of visual vertigo. His complaint of visually induced dizziness resolved following vestibular rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: When an individual with Irlen syndrome complains of dizziness, ruling out a concomitant diagnosis of a central and/or peripheral vestibular disorder is warranted. WHAT THIS ADDS TO THE EVIDENCE: The visual symptoms associated with Irlen syndrome can overlap with those of visually induced dizziness. This case report is the first to describe overlapping visual and vestibular complaints of dizziness in an individual with Irlen syndrome.


Subject(s)
Dizziness/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Vertigo/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vision Disorders/rehabilitation , Child , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
11.
Int Tinnitus J ; 23(1): 42-46, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31469527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Whiplash associated syndrome is one of the neck disorders that is accompanied by several chronic symptoms. Balancing problems arising from common disorders and dizziness are considered as manifestations that are time-consuming to evaluate and treat. The present study aims to investigate the effect of vestibular-balance rehabilitation using a test that can be used for differential diagnosis of these lesions by comparing dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and Smooth Pursuit Neck Torsion (SPNT) scores. METHOD: This was an analytical cross-sectional study with a two-stage design. Forty patients with whiplash-associated disorders were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. SPNT test and DHI evaluation were performed for both groups. For twenty people selected randomly in the intervention group, vestibular-balance rehabilitation was performed during 12 sessions. Finally, the SPNT and DHI tests were performed again to examine and compare the results. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the scores of smooth pursuit neck torsion gain in the SPNT test, the total score of DHI, the functional components of this questionnaire between the control and intervention groups after the implementation of the rehabilitation, and the differences in the physical, functional, and emotional components of the questionnaires of the control and intervention groups after rehabilitation exercises. CONCLUSION: Vestibular-balance rehabilitation exercises can be an effective treatment for dizziness and improving the quality of life of a person suffering from whiplash-associated disorder, followed by the reduction in dizziness caused by disability.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Whiplash Injuries/complications , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dizziness/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postural Balance/physiology , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Diseases/etiology , Vestibular Function Tests , Whiplash Injuries/diagnosis
12.
J Sport Rehabil ; 28(6): 540-543, 2019 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of intermittent hypoxia training (IHT) for dizziness. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. All participants were recruited from a rehabilitation department in an acute university-affiliated hospital. INTERVENTION: Participants with dizziness were randomly assigned to 2 groups (IHT group and control group). The Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, and Vertigo Visual Analog Scale were conducted at baseline, end of the fourth week. RESULTS: Among 52 subjects, there were18 males and 34 females, ages 35 to 62 years old (mean [SD] = 46.9 [7.93]). Time length since onset ranged from 12 to 34 months (20.2 [7.15] mo). Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Vertigo Visual Analog Scale scores, and attack frequencies of dizziness were improved after IHT intervention in the end of the fourth week. There were significant differences between the IHT group and the control group in the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Vertigo Visual Analog Scale scores, and attack frequencies of dizziness at the end of the fourth week (P < .05). No adverse events occurred during the study. CONCLUSION: IHT could improve dizziness after intervention at the end of the fourth week. IHT could be the effective method for treating dizziness.


Subject(s)
Dizziness/rehabilitation , Hypoxia , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Visual Analog Scale
13.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 139(9)2019 May 28.
Article in English, Nor | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31140261

ABSTRACT

Persistent symptoms of dizziness may be due to inappropriate compensatory strategies following an episode of acute dizziness. Common symptoms are dizziness in an upright position that is aggravated by visual stimuli and passive movement. In the World Health Organization's new disease classification, ICD-11, the condition has been named persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. It is important to recognise this condition in order to avoid unnecessary investigation and to initiate the correct treatment.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Dizziness/therapy , Humans , Postural Balance , Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/therapy
14.
J Sport Rehabil ; 28(7): 764-768, 2019 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30040008

ABSTRACT

Clinical Scenario: Every year, millions of people suffer a concussion. A significant portion of these people experience symptoms lasting longer than 10 days and are diagnosed with postconcussion syndrome. Dizziness is the second most reported symptom associated with a concussion and may be a predictor of prolonged recovery. Clinicians are beginning to incorporate vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) in their postconcussion treatment plan, in order to address the dysfunctional inner ear structures that could be causing this dizziness. Focused Clinical Question: Can VRT help postconcussion syndrome patients experiencing prolonged dizziness by improving their perceived disability? Summary of Key Findings: Three studies were included: 1 randomized control trial, 1 retrospective chart review, and 1 exploratory study. The randomized control trial compared cervical spine therapy alone to cervical spine therapy in conjunction with VRT to obtain medical clearance for sport. The chart review explored VRT as a treatment for reducing dizziness and improving balance and gait dysfunction. The exploratory study implemented VRT in conjunction with light aerobic exercise to improve perceived disability associated with dizziness postconcussion. All 3 studies found statistically significant decreases (improvements) in Dizziness Handicap Index scores. Clinical Bottom Line: There is preliminary evidence suggesting that VRT can improve perceived disability in patients with postconcussion syndrome experiencing prolonged dizziness. There is a decrease (improvement) in Dizziness Handicap Index scores across all 3 studies. VRT is a relatively safe treatment option, with no adverse reactions or case reports. Strength of Recommendation: There is level 2 and level 3 evidence supporting the use of VRT to treat patients suffering from dizziness postconcussion.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/rehabilitation , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Post-Concussion Syndrome/rehabilitation , Brain Concussion/complications , Dizziness/etiology , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Post-Concussion Syndrome/complications , Postural Balance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
J Sport Rehabil ; 27(5): 485-490, 2018 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28530516

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Adolescents who suffer sport concussion typically respond to a prescription of cognitive and physical rest in the acute phases of healing; however, some adolescents do not respond to rest alone. Dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance are impairments, which may linger longer than 30 days, leading to a diagnosis of postconcussion syndrome (PCS). Vestibular assessment and therapy may benefit adolescents suffering from these persistent symptoms. CLINICAL QUESTION: Does vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) rather than continued prescription of rest (cognitive and physical) reduce recovery time and persistent symptoms of dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance in adolescents (12-18 y) who suffer PCS following a sports-related concussion? Summary of Key Findings: All 4 studies selected included adolescents suffering from PCS, specifically continued dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance. VRT was an effective intervention for this population. Adolescents presenting with this cluster of symptoms may also demonstrate verbal and visual memory loss linked to changes in the vestibular system postconcussion. Improved screening tools can help better understand vestibular system changes, identify adolescents who may benefit from VRT sooner, and decrease long-term impairments. Clinical Bottom Line: Moderate evidence supports that adolescents who suffer from persistent symptoms of dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance following sport concussion should be evaluated more specifically and earlier for vestibular dysfunction and can benefit from participation in individualized VRT. Early evaluation and treatment may result in a reduction of time lost from sport as well as a return to their premorbid condition. For these adolescents, VRT may be more beneficial than continued physical and cognitive rest when an adolescent's symptoms last longer than 30 days. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B evidence exists to support that VRT is more effective than continued cognitive and physical rest in reducing persistent symptoms of dizziness, unsteadiness, and imbalance in adolescents who suffer PCS.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Brain Concussion/rehabilitation , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Post-Concussion Syndrome/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Humans , Post-Concussion Syndrome/physiopathology , Postural Balance
16.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 27(12): 2009-2018, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211600

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to (a) assess the feasibility of recruitment/retention of participants, protocol/resource management, and participant safety, and (b) estimate the size of the effect between the experimental and control groups. This was a feasibility study conducted as a prospective pilot double-blind randomized clinical trial. Subjects aged 10-23 years old with acute concussion and dizziness were enrolled from sports medicine centers. Forty-one participants were randomized into treatment and were seen for physical therapy beginning at 10 days post-concussion. Subjects in the experimental group received individually tailored, pragmatically delivered progressive interventions. Subjects in the control received prescriptive sham to minimally progressive interventions. The two primary outcomes were medical clearance for return-to-play and symptomatic recovery. The median number of days to medical clearance for the experimental group was 15.5 and for the control was 26. The median number of days to symptomatic recovery was 13.5 for the experimental group and was 17 for the control. According to Cox proportional hazards regression for time to medical release for return-to-play, the experimental group demonstrated a hazard ratio of 2.91 (95% CI: 1.01, 8.43) compared to the control. For time-to-symptomatic recovery, those in the experimental group demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.99 (95% CI: 0.95, 4.15) compared to the control. The results indicate that it is feasible and safe to complete this type of intervention study. The results provide strong support for the allocation of resources to conduct well-powered randomized clinical trials of this intervention.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Brain Concussion/rehabilitation , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Adolescent , Double-Blind Method , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
17.
Br J Sports Med ; 51(5): 442-451, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27655831

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Concussion symptoms normally resolve within 7-10 days but vertigo, dizziness and balance dysfunction persist in 10-30% of cases causing significant morbidity. This study systematically evaluated the evidence supporting the efficacy, prescription and progression patterns of vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) in patients with concussion. DESIGN: Systematic Review, guided by PRISMA guidelines and presenting a best evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases PubMed (1949 to May 2015), CINAHL (1982 to May 2015), EMBASE (1947 to May 2015), SPORTDiscus (1985 to May 2015), Web of Science (1945 to May 2015) and PEDRO (1999 to May 2015), supplemented by manual searches and grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Article or abstract of original research, population of patients with concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with vestibular symptoms, interventions detailing VRT, measurement of outcomes pre-VRT/post-VRT. Study type was not specified. RESULTS: Following a double review of abstract and full-text articles, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trial (n=2), uncontrolled studies (n=3) and case studies (n=5). 4 studies evaluated VRT as a single intervention. 6 studies incorporated VRT in multimodal interventions (including manual therapy, strength training, occupational tasks, counselling or medication). 9 studies reported improvement in outcomes but level I evidence from only 1 study was found that demonstrated increased rates (OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.34 to 11.34; p=0.002) of medical clearance for return to sport within 8 weeks, when VRT (combined with cervical therapy) was compared with usual care. Heterogeneity in study type and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Habituation and adaptation exercises were employed in 8 studies and balance exercises in 9 studies. Prescription and progression patterns lacked standardisation. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence for optimal prescription and efficacy of VRT in patients with mTBI/concussion is limited. Available evidence, although weak, shows promise in this population. Further high-level studies evaluating the effects of VRT in patients with mTBI/concussion with vestibular and/or balance dysfunction are required.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postural Balance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Return to Sport , Vertigo/diagnosis , Vertigo/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology
18.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(3): 1245-1250, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27450383

ABSTRACT

Dizziness is a common medical condition that has been related to falls in the elderly, and it is, therefore, considered a severe social health problem. Particularly in the elderly, the impact of dizziness may be relevant, as it has been linked to several conditions, such as isolation, depression, reduced self autonomy, and self control. The social, functional, and psychological well-being of those affected can be hampered significantly, thus reducing the quality-of-life (QoL) perception. In addition, due to the aging of the population in the developed world, dizziness is becoming a growing public health problem; an optimal management of this condition includes, nowadays, the improvement of rehabilitative programs, as well as the evaluation of QoL status and its management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of dizziness on the QoL in the elderly, also analyzing the instruments available, nowadays, to evaluate QoL of dizzy patients.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Depression , Dizziness , Quality of Life , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Depression/etiology , Depression/prevention & control , Disease Management , Dizziness/complications , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/psychology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Humans , Public Health , Self-Control
19.
HNO ; 65(Suppl 2): 149-152, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28271170

ABSTRACT

The current paper reports on a patient with recurrent rotational vertigo and persistent dizziness and imbalance lasting several weeks, who underwent extensive neuro-otological and radiological examinations. Pathological findings initially included right-sided benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), persistent horizontal spontaneous nystagmus (SPN) to the left, and a pathological bedside and video head impulse test (HIT) on the left. The pathological HIT on the left and the SPN to the left indicated a central origin. Therefore, cranial magnetic resonance imaging was performed which revealed a left-sided ischemic stroke in the territory of the medial branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (mPICA).


Subject(s)
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/etiology , Cerebellar Diseases/diagnosis , Cerebral Infarction/diagnosis , Dizziness/etiology , Meniere Disease/etiology , Nystagmus, Pathologic/etiology , Vestibular Diseases/etiology , Acute Disease , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/diagnosis , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/rehabilitation , Cerebellar Diseases/complications , Cerebellar Diseases/rehabilitation , Cerebellum/blood supply , Cerebral Infarction/complications , Cerebral Infarction/rehabilitation , Diagnosis, Differential , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Female , Head Impulse Test , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Meniere Disease/diagnosis , Meniere Disease/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Nystagmus, Pathologic/diagnosis , Nystagmus, Pathologic/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postural Balance/physiology , Syndrome , Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Video Recording
20.
J Neurol Phys Ther ; 40(2): 124-55, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26913496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uncompensated vestibular hypofunction results in postural instability, visual blurring with head movement, and subjective complaints of dizziness and/or imbalance. We sought to answer the question, "Is vestibular exercise effective at enhancing recovery of function in people with peripheral (unilateral or bilateral) vestibular hypofunction?" METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed in 5 databases published after 1985 and 5 additional sources for relevant publications were searched. Article types included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case control series, and case series for human subjects, published in English. One hundred thirty-five articles were identified as relevant to this clinical practice guideline. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Based on strong evidence and a preponderance of benefit over harm, clinicians should offer vestibular rehabilitation to persons with unilateral and bilateral vestibular hypofunction with impairments and functional limitations related to the vestibular deficit. Based on strong evidence and a preponderance of harm over benefit, clinicians should not include voluntary saccadic or smooth-pursuit eye movements in isolation (ie, without head movement) as specific exercises for gaze stability. Based on moderate evidence, clinicians may offer specific exercise techniques to target identified impairments or functional limitations. Based on moderate evidence and in consideration of patient preference, clinicians may provide supervised vestibular rehabilitation. Based on expert opinion extrapolated from the evidence, clinicians may prescribe a minimum of 3 times per day for the performance of gaze stability exercises as 1 component of a home exercise program. Based on expert opinion extrapolated from the evidence (range of supervised visits: 2-38 weeks, mean = 10 weeks), clinicians may consider providing adequate supervised vestibular rehabilitation sessions for the patient to understand the goals of the program and how to manage and progress themselves independently. As a general guide, persons without significant comorbidities that affect mobility and with acute or subacute unilateral vestibular hypofunction may need once a week supervised sessions for 2 to 3 weeks; persons with chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction may need once a week sessions for 4 to 6 weeks; and persons with bilateral vestibular hypofunction may need once a week sessions for 8 to 12 weeks. In addition to supervised sessions, patients are provided a daily home exercise program. DISCLAIMER: These recommendations are intended as a guide for physical therapists and clinicians to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for persons with peripheral vestibular hypofunction undergoing vestibular rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the author (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A124).


Subject(s)
Dizziness/rehabilitation , Evidence-Based Practice , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postural Balance , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL