Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.059
Filter
1.
Cell ; 185(8): 1308-1324.e23, 2022 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35325593

ABSTRACT

Asymmetric localization of oskar ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules to the oocyte posterior is crucial for abdominal patterning and germline formation in the Drosophila embryo. We show that oskar RNP granules in the oocyte are condensates with solid-like physical properties. Using purified oskar RNA and scaffold proteins Bruno and Hrp48, we confirm in vitro that oskar granules undergo a liquid-to-solid phase transition. Whereas the liquid phase allows RNA incorporation, the solid phase precludes incorporation of additional RNA while allowing RNA-dependent partitioning of client proteins. Genetic modification of scaffold granule proteins or tethering the intrinsically disordered region of human fused in sarcoma (FUS) to oskar mRNA allowed modulation of granule material properties in vivo. The resulting liquid-like properties impaired oskar localization and translation with severe consequences on embryonic development. Our study reflects how physiological phase transitions shape RNA-protein condensates to regulate the localization and expression of a maternal RNA that instructs germline formation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Animals , Cytoplasmic Ribonucleoprotein Granules , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryonic Development , Oocytes/metabolism , RNA/metabolism
2.
Cell ; 161(4): 893-906, 2015 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25936838

ABSTRACT

DNA N(6)-methyladenine (6mA) modification is commonly found in microbial genomes and plays important functions in regulating numerous biological processes in bacteria. However, whether 6mA occurs and what its potential roles are in higher-eukaryote cells remain unknown. Here, we show that 6mA is present in Drosophila genome and that the 6mA modification is dynamic and is regulated by the Drosophila Tet homolog, DNA 6mA demethylase (DMAD), during embryogenesis. Importantly, our biochemical assays demonstrate that DMAD directly catalyzes 6mA demethylation in vitro. Further genetic and sequencing analyses reveal that DMAD is essential for development and that DMAD removes 6mA primarily from transposon regions, which correlates with transposon suppression in Drosophila ovary. Collectively, we uncover a DNA modification in Drosophila and describe a potential role of the DMAD-6mA regulatory axis in controlling development in higher eukaryotes.


Subject(s)
Adenine/analogs & derivatives , DNA Methylation , Drosophila/metabolism , Adenine/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , DNA Transposable Elements , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/enzymology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Molecular Sequence Data , Ovary/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Site-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)/metabolism
3.
Genes Dev ; 35(1-2): 157-174, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334823

ABSTRACT

How homeodomain proteins gain sufficient specificity to control different cell fates has been a long-standing problem in developmental biology. The conserved Gsx homeodomain proteins regulate specific aspects of neural development in animals from flies to mammals, and yet they belong to a large transcription factor family that bind nearly identical DNA sequences in vitro. Here, we show that the mouse and fly Gsx factors unexpectedly gain DNA binding specificity by forming cooperative homodimers on precisely spaced and oriented DNA sites. High-resolution genomic binding assays revealed that Gsx2 binds both monomer and homodimer sites in the developing mouse ventral telencephalon. Importantly, reporter assays showed that Gsx2 mediates opposing outcomes in a DNA binding site-dependent manner: Monomer Gsx2 binding represses transcription, whereas homodimer binding stimulates gene expression. In Drosophila, the Gsx homolog, Ind, similarly represses or stimulates transcription in a site-dependent manner via an autoregulatory enhancer containing a combination of monomer and homodimer sites. Integrating these findings, we test a model showing how the homodimer to monomer site ratio and the Gsx protein levels defines gene up-regulation versus down-regulation. Altogether, these data serve as a new paradigm for how cooperative homeodomain transcription factor binding can increase target specificity and alter regulatory outcomes.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Genome/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Mice , Protein Binding , Telencephalon/embryology
4.
Cell ; 152(1-2): 97-108, 2013 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23332748

ABSTRACT

Stem and/or progenitor cells often generate distinct cell types in a stereotyped birth order and over time lose competence to specify earlier-born fates by unknown mechanisms. In Drosophila, the Hunchback transcription factor acts in neural progenitors (neuroblasts) to specify early-born neurons, in part by indirectly inducing the neuronal transcription of its target genes, including the hunchback gene. We used in vivo immuno-DNA FISH and found that the hunchback gene moves to the neuroblast nuclear periphery, a repressive subnuclear compartment, precisely when competence to specify early-born fate is lost and several hours and cell divisions after termination of its transcription. hunchback movement to the lamina correlated with downregulation of the neuroblast nuclear protein, Distal antenna (Dan). Either prolonging Dan expression or disrupting lamina interfered with hunchback repositioning and extended neuroblast competence. We propose that neuroblasts undergo a developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization to permanently silence Hunchback target genes that results in loss of progenitor competence.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genome, Insect , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Neural Stem Cells/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism
5.
Development ; 151(10)2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757779

ABSTRACT

Collective migration of caudal visceral mesoderm (CVM) cells in Drosophila embryos helps form the longitudinal muscles of the larval gut. In their study, Angelike Stathopoulos and colleagues reveal that cell division coordinates two gene expression programmes in migrating CVM cells. To know more about their work, we spoke to the first author, Jingjing Sun, and the corresponding author, Angelike Stathopoulos, Professor in the Division of Biology at the California Institute of Technology, USA.


Subject(s)
Developmental Biology , Animals , Developmental Biology/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Mesoderm/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Cell Movement , Humans
6.
Development ; 151(13)2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864272

ABSTRACT

Tissue morphogenesis is often controlled by actomyosin networks pulling on adherens junctions (AJs), but junctional myosin levels vary. At an extreme, the Drosophila embryo amnioserosa forms a horseshoe-shaped strip of aligned, spindle-shaped cells lacking junctional myosin. What are the bases of amnioserosal cell interactions and alignment? Compared with surrounding tissue, we find that amnioserosal AJ continuity has lesser dependence on α-catenin, the mediator of AJ-actomyosin association, and greater dependence on Bazooka/Par-3, a junction-associated scaffold protein. Microtubule bundles also run along amnioserosal AJs and support their long-range curvilinearity. Amnioserosal confinement is apparent from partial overlap of its spindle-shaped cells, its outward bulging from surrounding tissue and from compressive stress detected within the amnioserosa. Genetic manipulations that alter amnioserosal confinement by surrounding tissue also result in amnioserosal cells losing alignment and gaining topological defects characteristic of nematically ordered systems. With Bazooka depletion, confinement by surrounding tissue appears to be relatively normal and amnioserosal cells align despite their AJ fragmentation. Overall, the fully elongated amnioserosa appears to form through tissue-autonomous generation of spindle-shaped cells that nematically align in response to confinement by surrounding tissue.


Subject(s)
Adherens Junctions , Drosophila Proteins , Embryonic Development , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Adherens Junctions/metabolism , Microtubules/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , alpha Catenin/metabolism , Actomyosin/metabolism , Morphogenesis , Drosophila/embryology , Cell Shape , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
7.
Development ; 151(11)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819456

ABSTRACT

Drosophila nervous system development progresses through a series of well-characterized steps in which homeodomain transcription factors (HDTFs) play key roles during most, if not all, phases. Strikingly, although some HDTFs have only one role, many others are involved in multiple steps of the developmental process. Most Drosophila HDTFs engaged in nervous system development are conserved in vertebrates and often play similar roles during vertebrate development. In this Spotlight, we focus on the role of HDTFs during embryogenesis, where they were first characterized.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Homeodomain Proteins , Nervous System , Transcription Factors , Animals , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Nervous System/metabolism , Nervous System/embryology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism
8.
Development ; 151(10)2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738602

ABSTRACT

Visual circuit development is characterized by subdivision of neuropils into layers that house distinct sets of synaptic connections. We find that, in the Drosophila medulla, this layered organization depends on the axon guidance regulator Plexin A. In Plexin A null mutants, synaptic layers of the medulla neuropil and arborizations of individual neurons are wider and less distinct than in controls. Analysis of semaphorin function indicates that Semaphorin 1a, acting in a subset of medulla neurons, is the primary partner for Plexin A in medulla lamination. Removal of the cytoplasmic domain of endogenous Plexin A has little effect on the formation of medulla layers; however, both null and cytoplasmic domain deletion mutations of Plexin A result in an altered overall shape of the medulla neuropil. These data suggest that Plexin A acts as a receptor to mediate morphogenesis of the medulla neuropil, and as a ligand for Semaphorin 1a to subdivide it into layers. Its two independent functions illustrate how a few guidance molecules can organize complex brain structures by each playing multiple roles.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Morphogenesis , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Neuropil , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian , Receptors, Cell Surface , Semaphorins , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Semaphorins/metabolism , Semaphorins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Morphogenesis/genetics , Neuropil/metabolism , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/embryology , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Receptors, Cell Surface/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Neurons/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Mutation/genetics
9.
Development ; 151(10)2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646822

ABSTRACT

The precise assembly of tissues and organs relies on spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression to coordinate the collective behavior of cells. In Drosophila embryos, the midgut musculature is formed through collective migration of caudal visceral mesoderm (CVM) cells, but how gene expression changes as cells migrate is not well understood. Here, we have focused on ten genes expressed in the CVM and the cis-regulatory sequences controlling their expression. Although some genes are continuously expressed, others are expressed only early or late during migration. Late expression relates to cell cycle progression, as driving string/Cdc25 causes earlier division of CVM cells and accelerates the transition to late gene expression. In particular, we found that the cell cycle effector transcription factor E2F1 is a required input for the late gene CG5080. Furthermore, whereas late genes are broadly expressed in all CVM cells, early gene transcripts are polarized to the anterior or posterior ends of the migrating collective. We show this polarization requires transcription factors Snail, Zfh1 and Dorsocross. Collectively, these results identify two sequential gene expression programs bridged by cell division that support long-distance directional migration of CVM cells.


Subject(s)
Cell Division , Cell Movement , Drosophila Proteins , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Animals , Cell Movement/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Cell Division/genetics , Mesoderm/metabolism , Mesoderm/cytology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , E2F1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , E2F1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Snail Family Transcription Factors/metabolism , Snail Family Transcription Factors/genetics
10.
Annu Rev Genet ; 53: 67-91, 2019 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31283358

ABSTRACT

Cell-cell fusion is indispensable for creating life and building syncytial tissues and organs. Ever since the discovery of cell-cell fusion, how cells join together to form zygotes and multinucleated syncytia has remained a fundamental question in cell and developmental biology. In the past two decades, Drosophila myoblast fusion has been used as a powerful genetic model to unravel mechanisms underlying cell-cell fusion in vivo. Many evolutionarily conserved fusion-promoting factors have been identified and so has a surprising and conserved cellular mechanism. In this review, we revisit key findings in Drosophila myoblast fusion and highlight the critical roles of cellular invasion and resistance in driving cell membrane fusion.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/cytology , Myoblasts/cytology , Actins/metabolism , Actomyosin/metabolism , Animals , Cell Adhesion Molecules/metabolism , Cell Fusion , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , Lipid Bilayers/metabolism , Muscles/cytology , Muscles/embryology , Myoblasts/physiology , Pupa/cytology
11.
PLoS Biol ; 22(4): e3002611, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683880

ABSTRACT

As tissues grow and change shape during animal development, they physically pull and push on each other, and these mechanical interactions can be important for morphogenesis. During Drosophila gastrulation, mesoderm invagination temporally overlaps with the convergence and extension of the ectodermal germband; the latter is caused primarily by Myosin II-driven polarised cell intercalation. Here, we investigate the impact of mesoderm invagination on ectoderm extension, examining possible mechanical and mechanotransductive effects on Myosin II recruitment and polarised cell intercalation. We find that the germband ectoderm is deformed by the mesoderm pulling in the orthogonal direction to germband extension (GBE), showing mechanical coupling between these tissues. However, we do not find a significant change in Myosin II planar polarisation in response to mesoderm invagination, nor in the rate of junction shrinkage leading to neighbour exchange events. We conclude that the main cellular mechanism of axis extension, polarised cell intercalation, is robust to the mesoderm invagination pull. We find, however, that mesoderm invagination slows down the rate of anterior-posterior cell elongation that contributes to axis extension, counteracting the tension from the endoderm invagination, which pulls along the direction of GBE.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster , Ectoderm , Gastrulation , Mesoderm , Myosin Type II , Animals , Mesoderm/embryology , Mesoderm/cytology , Gastrulation/physiology , Ectoderm/cytology , Ectoderm/embryology , Ectoderm/metabolism , Myosin Type II/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Cell Polarity , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Morphogenesis , Body Patterning/physiology , Drosophila/embryology
12.
Cell ; 150(5): 1016-28, 2012 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22939625

ABSTRACT

Morphogen gradients pattern tissues and organs during development. When morphogen production is spatially restricted, diffusion and degradation are sufficient to generate sharp concentration gradients. It is less clear how sharp gradients can arise within the source of a broadly expressed morphogen. A recent solution relies on localized production of an inhibitor outside the domain of morphogen production, which effectively redistributes (shuttles) and concentrates the morphogen within its expression domain. Here, we study how a sharp gradient is established without a localized inhibitor, focusing on early dorsoventral patterning of the Drosophila embryo, where an active ligand and its inhibitor are concomitantly generated in a broad ventral domain. Using theory and experiments, we show that a sharp Toll activation gradient is produced through "self-organized shuttling," which dynamically relocalizes inhibitor production to lateral regions, followed by inhibitor-dependent ventral shuttling of the activating ligand Spätzle. Shuttling may represent a general paradigm for patterning early embryos.


Subject(s)
Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Animals , Body Patterning , Drosophila Proteins , Mesoderm , Sulfotransferases
13.
Cell ; 151(2): 427-39, 2012 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23063130

ABSTRACT

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a lethal human disease characterized by motor neuron dysfunction and muscle deterioration due to depletion of the ubiquitous survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Drosophila SMN mutants have reduced muscle size and defective locomotion, motor rhythm, and motor neuron neurotransmission. Unexpectedly, restoration of SMN in either muscles or motor neurons did not alter these phenotypes. Instead, SMN must be expressed in proprioceptive neurons and interneurons in the motor circuit to nonautonomously correct defects in motor neurons and muscles. SMN depletion disrupts the motor system subsequent to circuit development and can be mimicked by the inhibition of motor network function. Furthermore, increasing motor circuit excitability by genetic or pharmacological inhibition of K(+) channels can correct SMN-dependent phenotypes. These results establish sensory-motor circuit dysfunction as the origin of motor system deficits in this SMA model and suggest that enhancement of motor neural network activity could ameliorate the disease.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Cholinergic Neurons/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Humans , Larva/metabolism , Motor Neurons/metabolism , Muscular Atrophy, Spinal/metabolism , Mutation , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Sensory Receptor Cells/metabolism
14.
Genes Dev ; 33(21-22): 1591-1612, 2019 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601616

ABSTRACT

Genome rearrangements that occur during evolution impose major challenges on regulatory mechanisms that rely on three-dimensional genome architecture. Here, we developed a scaffolding algorithm and generated chromosome-length assemblies from Hi-C data for studying genome topology in three distantly related Drosophila species. We observe extensive genome shuffling between these species with one synteny breakpoint after approximately every six genes. A/B compartments, a set of large gene-dense topologically associating domains (TADs), and spatial contacts between high-affinity sites (HAS) located on the X chromosome are maintained over 40 million years, indicating architectural conservation at various hierarchies. Evolutionary conserved genes cluster in the vicinity of HAS, while HAS locations appear evolutionarily flexible, thus uncoupling functional requirement of dosage compensation from individual positions on the linear X chromosome. Therefore, 3D architecture is preserved even in scenarios of thousands of rearrangements highlighting its relevance for essential processes such as dosage compensation of the X chromosome.


Subject(s)
Drosophila/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Genome, Insect/genetics , Algorithms , Animals , Chromosomes, Insect/genetics , Conserved Sequence , Dosage Compensation, Genetic , Drosophila/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian
15.
Cell ; 147(7): 1589-600, 2011 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22196733

ABSTRACT

Maintenance of a hematopoietic progenitor population requires extensive interaction with cells within a microenvironment or niche. In the Drosophila hematopoietic organ, niche-derived Hedgehog signaling maintains the progenitor population. Here, we show that the hematopoietic progenitors also require a signal mediated by Adenosine deaminase growth factor A (Adgf-A) arising from differentiating cells that regulates extracellular levels of adenosine. The adenosine signal opposes the effects of Hedgehog signaling within the hematopoietic progenitor cells and the magnitude of the adenosine signal is kept in check by the level of Adgf-A secreted from differentiating cells. Our findings reveal signals arising from differentiating cells that are required for maintaining progenitor cell quiescence and that function with the niche-derived signal in maintaining the progenitor state. Similar homeostatic mechanisms are likely to be utilized in other systems that maintain relatively large numbers of progenitors that are not all in direct contact with the cells of the niche.


Subject(s)
Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Stem Cell Niche , Animals , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Hedgehog Proteins/metabolism , Hematopoiesis , Hematopoietic System/metabolism , Hemocytes/cytology , Lymphoid Tissue/cytology , Myeloid Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism
16.
Cell ; 145(6): 956-68, 2011 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21663797

ABSTRACT

How complex networks of activators and repressors lead to exquisitely specific cell-type determination during development is poorly understood. In the Drosophila eye, expression patterns of Rhodopsins define at least eight functionally distinct though related subtypes of photoreceptors. Here, we describe a role for the transcription factor gene defective proventriculus (dve) as a critical node in the network regulating Rhodopsin expression. dve is a shared component of two opposing, interlocked feedforward loops (FFLs). Orthodenticle and Dve interact in an incoherent FFL to repress Rhodopsin expression throughout the eye. In R7 and R8 photoreceptors, a coherent FFL relieves repression by Dve while activating Rhodopsin expression. Therefore, this network uses repression to restrict and combinatorial activation to induce cell-type-specific expression. Furthermore, Dve levels are finely tuned to yield cell-type- and region-specific repression or activation outcomes. This interlocked FFL motif may be a general mechanism to control terminal cell-fate specification.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Regulatory Networks , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/metabolism , Rhodopsin/genetics , Animals , Drosophila/cytology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Eye/embryology , Feedback, Physiological , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
17.
Genes Dev ; 32(1): 42-57, 2018 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29378788

ABSTRACT

Gene expression is regulated by promoters, which initiate transcription, and enhancers, which control their temporal and spatial activity. However, the discovery that mammalian enhancers also initiate transcription questions the inherent differences between enhancers and promoters. Here, we investigate the transcriptional properties of enhancers during Drosophila embryogenesis using characterized developmental enhancers. We show that while the timing of enhancer transcription is generally correlated with enhancer activity, the levels and directionality of transcription are highly varied among active enhancers. To assess how this impacts function, we developed a dual transgenic assay to simultaneously measure enhancer and promoter activities from a single element in the same embryo. Extensive transgenic analysis revealed a relationship between the direction of endogenous transcription and the ability to function as an enhancer or promoter in vivo, although enhancer RNA (eRNA) production and activity are not always strictly coupled. Some enhancers (mainly bidirectional) can act as weak promoters, producing overlapping spatio-temporal expression. Conversely, bidirectional promoters often act as strong enhancers, while unidirectional promoters generally cannot. The balance between enhancer and promoter activity is generally reflected in the levels and directionality of eRNA transcription and is likely an inherent sequence property of the elements themselves.


Subject(s)
Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA, Untranslated/biosynthesis , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Embryonic Development/genetics , Humans , K562 Cells
18.
Dev Biol ; 514: 37-49, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885804

ABSTRACT

The conserved bazooka (baz/par3) gene acts as a key regulator of asymmetrical cell divisions across the animal kingdom. Associated Par3/Baz-Par6-aPKC protein complexes are also well known for their role in the establishment of apical/basal cell polarity in epithelial cells. Here we define a novel, positive function of Baz/Par3 in the Notch pathway. Using Drosophila wing and eye development, we demonstrate that Baz is required for Notch signaling activity and optimal transcriptional activation of Notch target genes. Baz appears to act independently of aPKC in these contexts, as knockdown of aPKC does not cause Notch loss-of-function phenotypes. Using transgenic Notch constructs, our data positions Baz activity downstream of activating Notch cleavage steps and upstream of Su(H)/CSL transcription factor complex activity on Notch target genes. We demonstrate a biochemical interaction between NICD and Baz, suggesting that Baz is required for NICD activity before NICD binds to Su(H). Taken together, our data define a novel role of the polarity protein Baz/Par3, as a positive and direct regulator of Notch signaling through its interaction with NICD.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Receptors, Notch , Signal Transduction , Wings, Animal , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Receptors, Notch/metabolism , Wings, Animal/metabolism , Wings, Animal/embryology , Wings, Animal/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Protein Binding , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Eye/embryology , Eye/metabolism , Eye/growth & development , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Cell Polarity , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
19.
EMBO J ; 40(18): e107245, 2021 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396565

ABSTRACT

During embryonic development, signalling pathways orchestrate organogenesis by controlling tissue-specific gene expression programmes and differentiation. Although the molecular components of many common developmental signalling systems are known, our current understanding of how signalling inputs are translated into gene expression outputs in real-time is limited. Here we employ optogenetics to control the activation of Notch signalling during Drosophila embryogenesis with minute accuracy and follow target gene expression by quantitative live imaging. Light-induced nuclear translocation of the Notch Intracellular Domain (NICD) causes a rapid activation of target mRNA expression. However, target gene transcription gradually decays over time despite continuous photo-activation and nuclear NICD accumulation, indicating dynamic adaptation to the signalling input. Using mathematical modelling and molecular perturbations, we show that this adaptive transcriptional response fits to known motifs capable of generating near-perfect adaptation and can be best explained by state-dependent inactivation at the target cis-regulatory region. Taken together, our results reveal dynamic nuclear adaptation as a novel mechanism controlling Notch signalling output during tissue differentiation.


Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Receptors, Notch/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Adaptation, Biological , Animals , Cell Nucleus/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Embryonic Development/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Organogenesis/genetics , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid
20.
Development ; 149(23)2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355083

ABSTRACT

Morphogens of the Hh family trigger gene expression changes in receiving cells in a concentration-dependent manner to regulate their identity, proliferation, death or metabolism, depending on the tissue or organ. This variety of responses relies on a conserved signaling pathway. Its logic includes a negative-feedback loop involving the Hh receptor Ptc. Here, using experiments and computational models we study and compare the different spatial signaling profiles downstream of Hh in several developing Drosophila organs. We show that the spatial distributions of Ptc and the activator transcription factor CiA in wing, antenna and ocellus show similar features, but are markedly different from that in the compound eye. We propose that these two profile types represent two time points along the signaling dynamics, and that the interplay between the spatial displacement of the Hh source in the compound eye and the negative-feedback loop maintains the receiving cells effectively in an earlier stage of signaling. These results show how the interaction between spatial and temporal dynamics of signaling and differentiation processes may contribute to the informational versatility of the conserved Hh signaling pathway.


Subject(s)
Drosophila , Hedgehog Proteins , Signal Transduction , Drosophila/embryology , Animals , Hedgehog Proteins/physiology , Wings, Animal/embryology , Compound Eye, Arthropod/embryology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL