Droxidopa or Atomoxetine for Refractory Hypotension in Critically Ill Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of droxidopa or atomoxetine on intravenous (IV) vasoactive agent discontinuation in cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hypotension refractory to midodrine. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary- and quaternary-care university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Included patients who received at least 4 consecutive doses of droxidopa or atomoxetine and remained on concurrent midodrine. Patients were excluded if they received study medication before admission, had clinical deterioration after study medication initiation requiring additional vasoactives/escalation of IV vasoactive dosage for at least 12 hours, had a diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome, were prisoners, or were pregnant. INTERVENTIONS: Droxidopa, atomoxetine, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was time to discontinuation of IV vasoactive agents after initiation of study medication, analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier estimate with the Wilcoxon method, censoring death within 24 hours of the last dose of study medication. No adjustment for repetitive analyses was made, as the analysis was hypothesis-generating. Of the 72 charts reviewed, 45 patients met inclusion criteria (18 atomoxetine, 17 droxidopa, and 10 both). There were no differences in median time to discontinuation of IV vasoactive agents (21.9 days v 8.0 days v 13.9 days, respectively; p = 0.259) or ICU or hospital length of stay between groups. A higher percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge received both study medications or droxidopa alone (90% v 76.5%) than atomoxetine alone (44.4%, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Droxidopa and atomoxetine are oral vasoactive agents with potential mechanisms to facilitate IV vasopressor weaning for patients in the ICU with hypotension refractory to midodrine, but further prospective research is needed.

The cause of eyelid ptosis, orthostatic hypotension and exercise intolerance.

To provide more insight in the delay in diagnosis and expectation of treatment adapted for the paediatrician, the data were collected from patients described with dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency are evaluated. More insight in clinical features of dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency consisting mainly of eyelid ptosis, orthostatic hypotension, hypoglycaemia and exercise intolerance, explains the delay in diagnosis of this congenital disorder, although all symptoms some more concealed are present. An increasing experience by L-DOPS, a resurrection for the patient, allows recommendations for early treatment. An explanation for the delay in diagnosis is provided together with the advice for treatment.

Orthostatic Hypotension: A Practical Approach.

Orthostatic hypotension is defined as a decrease in blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or more systolic or 10 mm Hg or more diastolic within three minutes of standing from the supine position or on assuming a head-up position of at least 60 degrees during tilt table testing. Symptoms are due to inadequate physiologic compensation and organ hypoperfusion and include headache, lightheadedness, shoulder and neck pain (coat hanger syndrome), visual disturbances, dyspnea, and chest pain. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in the community setting is 20% in older adults and 5% in middle-aged adults. Risk factors such as diabetes mellitus increase the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in all age groups. Orthostatic hypotension is associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular risk and falls, and up to a 50% increase in relative risk of all-cause mortality. Diagnosis is confirmed by performing a bedside simplified Schellong test, which consists of blood pressure and heart rate measurements after five minutes in the supine position and three minutes after moving to a standing position. If the patient is unable to stand safely or the clinical suspicion for orthostatic hypotension is high despite normal findings on the bedside test, head-up tilt table testing is recommended. Orthostatic hypotension is classified as neurogenic or nonneurogenic, depending on etiology and heart rate response. Treatment goals for orthostatic hypotension are reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. Initial treatment focuses on the underlying cause and adjusting potentially causative medications. Nonpharmacologic strategies include dietary modifications, compression garments, physical maneuvers, and avoiding environments that exacerbate symptoms. First-line medications include midodrine and droxidopa. Although fludrocortisone improves symptoms, it has concerning long-term effects.

Droxidopa management by an integrated health-system specialty pharmacy team.

BACKGROUND: Droxidopa, indicated for the treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, can be challenging for patients to access owing to manufacturer and payer restrictions, and requires close monitoring to ensure safety and effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: This practice report describes the development and outcomes of an integrated neurology specialty pharmacy team for droxidopa management. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: An integrated health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) connected to an academic institution with integrated specialty pharmacists working in collaboration with the providers in both the neurology and autonomic disfunction clinic. PRACTICE INNOVATION: In May 2017, the integrated HSSP developed droxidopa management services. Based on clinic-identified needs, the specialty pharmacy team completed droxidopa access requirements (insurance approval and affordability), provided comprehensive medication education at droxidopa initiation, and developed and executed droxidopa titration and monitoring plans in collaboration with providers. While patients were on droxidopa therapy, specialty pharmacist staff (pharmacists and technicians) monitored patients for safety and response to therapy and communicated with the health care team through the shared electronic health record. EVALUATION METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients with at least 3 fills of droxidopa using the integrated specialty pharmacy services from May 2017 to April 2020. Outcomes included persistence (defined as lack of 60-day gap in treatment), adherence (calculated using pharmacy claims and proportion of days covered [PDC]), and number and type of pharmacist interventions after droxidopa initiation. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients reviewed, 60 patients (72%) were persistent on droxidopa therapy over the study period. The median PDC was 0.98 (interquartile range 0.90-1.00). Over 36 months, the specialty pharmacist performed 60 interventions after droxidopa initiation, most related to dose changes, drug-drug interaction management, and medication reconciliation. CONCLUSION: The development of integrated specialty pharmacy services for patients prescribed droxidopa resulted in high droxidopa persistence and adherence. Interventions from the specialty pharmacist ensured droxidopa remained safe and appropriate for patients.

Analysis of L-DOPA and droxidopa binding to human ß2-adrenergic receptor.

Over the last two decades, an increasing number of studies has been devoted to a deeper understanding of the molecular process involved in the binding of various agonists and antagonists to active and inactive conformations of ß2-adrenergic receptor (ß2AR). The 3.2 Å x-ray crystal structure of human ß2AR active state in combination with the endogenous low affinity agonist adrenaline offers an ideal starting structure for studying the binding of various catecholamines to adrenergic receptors. We show that molecular docking of levodopa (L-DOPA) and droxidopa into rigid and flexible ß2AR models leads for both ligands to binding anchor sites comparable to those experimentally reported for adrenaline, namely D113/N312 and S203/S204/S207 side chains. Both ligands have a hydrogen bond network that is extremely similar to those of noradrenaline and dopamine. Interestingly, redocking neutral and protonated versions of adrenaline to rigid and flexible ß2AR models results in binding poses that are more energetically stable and distinct from the x-ray crystal structure. Similarly, lowest energy conformations of noradrenaline and dopamine generated by docking into flexible ß2AR models had binding free energies lower than those of best poses in rigid receptor models. Furthermore, our findings show that L-DOPA and droxidopa molecules have binding affinities comparable to those predicted for adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine, which are consistent with previous experimental and computational findings and supported by the molecular dynamics simulations of ß2AR-ligand complexes performed here.

Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up of dopamine beta hydroxylase deficiency.

Dopamine beta hydroxylase (DBH) deficiency is an extremely rare autosomal recessive disorder with severe orthostatic hypotension, that can be treated with L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-DOPS). We aimed to summarize clinical, biochemical, and genetic data of all world-wide reported patients with DBH-deficiency, and to present detailed new data on long-term follow-up of a relatively large Dutch cohort. We retrospectively describe 10 patients from a Dutch cohort and 15 additional patients from the literature. We identified 25 patients (15 females) from 20 families. Ten patients were diagnosed in the Netherlands. Duration of follow-up of Dutch patients ranged from 1 to 21 years (median 13 years). All patients had severe orthostatic hypotension. Severely decreased or absent (nor)epinephrine, and increased dopamine plasma concentrations were found in 24/25 patients. Impaired kidney function and anemia were present in all Dutch patients, hypomagnesaemia in 5 out of 10. Clinically, all patients responded very well to L-DOPS, with marked reduction of orthostatic complaints. However, orthostatic hypotension remained present, and kidney function, anemia, and hypomagnesaemia only partially improved. Plasma norepinephrine increased and became detectable, while epinephrine remained undetectable in most patients. We confirm the core clinical characteristics of DBH-deficiency and the pathognomonic profile of catecholamines in body fluids. Impaired renal function, anemia, and hypomagnesaemia can be part of the clinical presentation. The subjective response to L-DOPS treatment is excellent and sustained, although the neurotransmitter profile in plasma does not normalize completely. Furthermore, orthostatic hypotension as well as renal function, anemia, and hypomagnesaemia improve only partially.

Prevention and Management of Supine Hypertension in Patients With Orthostatic Hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a potentially debilitating condition caused by dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system, which is essential for the physiologic response to orthostatic posture. In addition to OH, autonomic dysfunction may also be associated with the development of concurrent supine hypertension (SH). AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: This paradoxical effect speaks to the complexity of the pathogenesis of autonomic disease and greatly complicates management of these patients. Clinicians are faced with a dilemma because aggressive treatment of orthostatic intolerance can worsen supine hypertension and attempts to control supine hypertension can worsen orthostatic intolerance. DATA SOURCES: Systematic review of the published literature. PREVENTION OF SUPINE HYPERTENSION: Patients should aim to avoid known stressors, perform physical maneuvers (eg, slowly getting up from bed, sleeping with head of bed elevated), manage underlying related conditions (eg, diabetes mellitus), and exercise. MANAGEMENT OF SUPINE HYPERTENSION: With failure of conservative management, patients may advance to pharmacologic therapy. It is important to understand the underlying suspected etiology of the syndrome of supine hypertension and OH (SH-OH) to select promising pharmacologic agents. This article reviews medical treatment options to work toward achieving a better quality of life for patients afflicted with this disease. Although clonidine and beta-blockers can be used to treat hypertension without causing significant hypotension, midodrine, pyridostigmine, and droxidopa may be helpful in preventing OH. CONCLUSION: The etiology and severity of autonomic dysfunction vary widely between patients, suggesting a need for an individualized treatment approach. Achieving perfect blood pressure control is not a realistic goal. Rather, treatment should be aimed at improving the patient's quality of life and decreasing their risk of injury and organ damage.

Management Strategies for Comorbid Supine Hypertension in Patients with Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In autonomic failure, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) and neurogenic supine hypertension (nSH) are interrelated conditions characterized by postural blood pressure (BP) dysregulation. nOH results in a sustained BP drop upon standing, which can lead to symptoms that include lightheadedness, orthostatic dizziness, presyncope, and syncope. nSH is characterized by elevated BP when supine and, although often asymptomatic, may increase long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. This article reviews the pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of nOH and nSH, and describes the management of patients with both nOH and nSH. RECENT FINDINGS: Pressor medications required to treat the symptoms of nOH also increase the risk of nSH. Because nOH and nSH are hemodynamically opposed, therapies to treat one condition may exacerbate the other. The management of patients with nOH who also have nSH can be challenging and requires an individualized approach to balance the short- and long-term risks associated with these conditions. Approaches to manage neurogenic BP dysregulation include nonpharmacologic approaches and pharmacologic treatments. A stepwise treatment approach is presented to help guide neurologists in managing patients with both nOH and nSH.

Safety and efficacy of ampreloxetine in symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a phase 2 trial.

PURPOSE: In neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, blood pressure falls when upright owing to impaired release of norepinephrine, leading to dizziness. Ampreloxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, increases circulating norepinephrine levels. This study explored the safety of ampreloxetine and its effect on blood pressure and symptoms in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. METHODS: A multicenter ascending-dose trial (range 1-20 mg, Part A) was followed by a 1 day, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (median dose 15 mg, Part B). Eligible patients then enrolled in a 20-week, open-label, steady-state extension phase (median dose 10 mg, Part C) followed by a 4-week withdrawal. Assessments included the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Scale (item 1), supine/seated/standing blood pressure, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (age 66 ± 8 years, 22 men) were enrolled. Part A: The proportion of participants with a positive response (i.e., increase from baseline in seated systolic blood pressure of ≥ 10 mmHg) was greater with the 5 and 10 mg ampreloxetine doses than with placebo or other active ampreloxetine doses. Part B: Seated blood pressure increased 15.7 mmHg 4 h after ampreloxetine and decreased 14.2 mmHg after placebo [least squares mean difference (95% CI) 29.9 mmHg (7.6-52.3); P = 0.0112]. Part C: Symptoms of dizziness/lightheadedness improved 3.1 ± 3.0 points from baseline and standing systolic blood pressure increased 11 ± 12 mmHg. After 4 weeks of withdrawal, symptoms returned to pretreatment levels. The effect of ampreloxetine on supine blood pressure was minimal throughout treatment duration. CONCLUSION: Ampreloxetine was well tolerated and improved orthostatic symptoms and seated/standing blood pressure with little change in supine blood pressure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02705755 (first posted March 10, 2016).

Clinical Trials for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension: A Comprehensive Review of Endpoints, Pitfalls, and Challenges.

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is among the most debilitating nonmotor features of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. Patients with PD and nOH generate more hospitalizations, make more emergency room visits, create more telephone calls/mails to doctors, and have earlier mortality than those with PD but without nOH. Overall, the health-related cost in patients with PD and OH is 2.5-fold higher compared with patients with PD without OH. Hence, developing effective therapies for nOH should be a research priority. In the last few decades, improved understanding of the pathophysiology of nOH has led to the identification of therapeutic targets and the development and approval of two drugs, midodrine and droxidopa. More effective and safer therapies, however, are still needed, particularly agents that could selectively increase blood pressure only in the standing position because supine hypertension is the main limitation of available drugs. Here we review the design and conduct of nOH clinical trials in patients with PD and other synucleinopathies, summarize the results of the most recently completed and ongoing trials, and discuss challenges, bottlenecks, and potential remedies.

Persistent unexplained chest pain and dyspnea in a patient with coronary artery disease: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, a sustained decrease in blood pressure upon standing, is caused by autonomic nervous system failure and characterized by an insufficient increase in heart rate needed to maintain blood pressure upon standing. In this case, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension symptoms preceded a diagnosis of Parkinson disease. A diagnosis of underlying neurogenic orthostatic hypotension significantly changed the course of treatment for this patient. CASE PRESENTATION: An 84-year-old woman was referred to a cardiologist by her primary care practitioner for evaluation of exertional dyspnea and chest pain upon walking a few feet. Her medical history included hypertension, hypothyroidism, and osteoarthritis. Based on her continued symptoms, the patient underwent 2 cardiac catheterizations for coronary artery stenosis. After the catheterizations, exertional dyspnea and chest pain continued, and subsequently, dysphagia to solid foods and episodic dizziness developed. Orthostatic evaluation showed a supine blood pressure of 150/80 mmHg with a heart rate of 70 beats per min. Upon standing for 3 min, the patient's blood pressure decreased to 110/74 mmHg with a heart rate of 76 beats per min. The diagnostic criteria for orthostatic hypotension were met, and the lack of an adequate compensatory heart rate increase upon standing was consistent with a neurogenic cause (ie, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension), which was supported by tilt-table testing results. Although nonpharmacologic treatments were initially successful, episodes of lightheadedness, chest pain, and dyspnea upon standing became more frequent, and the patient was prescribed droxidopa (200 mg; 3 times daily). Droxidopa significantly improved her symptoms, with the patient reporting resolution of her chest pain and significant improvement of dyspnea and dizziness. She was diagnosed with Parkinson disease approximately 6 months later. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the importance of evaluating and identifying potential causes of symptoms of cardiovascular disease when persistent symptoms do not improve after cardiac interventions. This case complements findings demonstrating that signs of autonomic failure, such as neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, may precede the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease. Importantly, this case provides real-world evidence for the efficacy of droxidopa to treat the symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, after an appropriate diagnosis.

Substantial renal conversion of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (droxidopa) to norepinephrine in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

BACKGROUND: The pressor effect of L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-DOPS, droxidopa, Northera™) results from conversion of L-DOPS to norepinephrine (NE) in cells expressing L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase (LAAAD). After L-DOPS administration the increase in systemic plasma NE is too small to explain the increase in blood pressure. Renal proximal tubular cells abundantly express LAAAD. Since NE generated locally in the kidneys could contribute to the pressor effect of L-DOPS, in this study we assessed renal conversion of L-DOPS to NE. METHODS: Ten patients who were taking L-DOPS for symptomatic orthostatic hypotension had blood and urine sampled about 2 h after the last L-DOPS dose. L-DOPS and NE were assayed by alumina extraction followed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Data were compared in patients off vs. on levodopa/carbidopa. RESULTS: In patients off levodopa/carbidopa the ratio of NE/L-DOPS in urine averaged 63 times that in plasma (p = 0.0009 by t test applied to log-transformed data). In marked contrast, in the three patients on levodopa/carbidopa the ratio of NE/L-DOPS in urine did not differ from that in plasma. CONCLUSION: There is extensive renal production of NE from L-DOPS. Carbidopa seems to attenuate the conversion of L-DOPS to NE in the kidneys. Further research is needed to assess whether the proposed paracrine effect of L-DOPS in the kidneys contributes to the systemic pressor response.

Cognitive and Behavioral Changes in Patients Treated With Droxidopa for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Droxidopa is a norepinephrine precursor that improves symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in conditions such as Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, and pure autonomic failure by inducing a pressor effect. Unlike other pressor agents, droxidopa crosses the blood-brain barrier; however, its central effects are, as of yet, uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: We present the results of a retrospective cohort study examining cognitive and behavioral side effects linked to droxidopa therapy. METHODS: We performed a review of 101 patients who had been treated with droxidopa at an academic tertiary care center and identified cases of cognitive and behavioral changes associated with the therapy. RESULTS: We identified six patients who had developed cognitive and behavioral symptoms, including memory difficulties, confusion, mania, and irritability, shortly after droxidopa initiation. All six patients displayed symptoms of synucleinopathy, manifesting with autonomic failure, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, and parkinsonism. Patients had no significant cognitive or behavioral symptoms before droxidopa initiation. Behavioral disturbances were observed early in the droxidopa titration period and at relatively low doses. Symptoms resolved with dose reduction in four patients, and droxidopa was discontinued in two patients due to persistent irritability. No other medical comorbidities or alternative etiologies were identified to explain the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Droxidopa is designed to act peripherally as a pressor agent but may also exert important central effects. We hypothesize that the cognitive and behavioral manifestations observed in the patients with orthostatic hypotension resulted from an "overdose" of key noradrenergic networks linking orbitofrontal and mesolimbic regions.

Orthostatic hypotension for the cardiologist.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Orthostatic hypotension is a phenomenon commonly encountered in a cardiologist's clinical practice that has significant diagnostic and prognostic value for a cardiologist. Given the mounting evidence associating cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with orthostatic hypotension, cardiologists will play an increasing role in treating and managing patients with orthostatic hypotension. RECENT FINDINGS: The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society recently published consensus guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of syncope and their instigators, including orthostatic hypotension. Additionally, consensus guidelines have also been recently updated, reinforcing the universal definition orthostatic hypotension and its closely associated pathologies. Finally, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved droxidopa, a synthetic oral norepinephrine prodrug, in 2014 for the treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH), and it represents a well tolerated, effective, and easy to use intervention for nOH. This represents only the second drug approved by the FDA for orthostatic hypotension, the first being midodrine in 1986. A handful of smaller head-to-head studies have pitted not only pharmacologic agents to one another but also nonpharmacologic interventions to pharmacologic agents. Additionally, recent studies have also reported on more convenient screening tools for orthostatic hypotension. SUMMARY: Though there have been many advances in the management of orthostatic hypotension, nOH remains a chronic, debilitating, and often progressively fatal condition. Cardiologists can play a very important role in optimizing hemodynamics in this patient population to improve quality of life and minimize cardiovascular risk.

Standing and Supine Blood Pressure Outcomes Associated With Droxidopa and Midodrine in Patients With Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension: A Bayesian Meta-analysis and Mixed Treatment Comparison of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effects of droxidopa and midodrine on standing systolic blood pressure (sSBP) and risk of supine hypertension in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To perform a Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis of droxidopa and midodrine in the treatment of NOH. METHODS: The PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 16, 2016. Study selection consisted of randomized trials comparing droxidopa or midodrine with placebo and reporting on changes in sSBP and supine hypertension events. Data were pooled to perform a comparison among interventions in a Bayesian fixed-effects model using vague priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation with Gibbs sampling, calculating pooled mean changes in sSBP and risk ratios (RRs) for supine hypertension with associated 95% credible intervals (CrIs). RESULTS: Six studies (4 administering droxidopa and 2 administering midodrine) enrolling a total of 783 patients were included for analysis. The mean change from baseline in sSBP was significantly greater for both drugs when compared with placebo (droxidopa 6.2 mm Hg [95% CrI = 2.4-10] and midodrine 17 mm Hg [95% CrI = 11.4-23]). Comparative analysis revealed a significant credible difference between droxidopa and midodrine. The RR for supine hypertension was significantly greater for midodrine, but not droxidopa, when compared with placebo (droxidopa RR = 1.4 [95% CrI = 0.7-2.7] and midodrine RR = 5.1 [95% CrI = 1.6-24]). Conclusion and Relevance: In patients with NOH, both droxidopa and midodrine significantly increase sSBP, the latter to a greater extent. However, midodrine, but not droxidopa, significantly increases risk of supine hypertension.

[Arterial hypotension: behind the scenes]. / Hypotension artérielle : l'envers du décor.

Arterial hypotension is a frequently encountered phenomenon in clinical practice. It is responsible for multiple consultations and/or hospitalizations, mostly in elderly people. It is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Arterial hypotension can be constitutional, part of a syndrome, orthostatic, or secondary (drug induced, hypovolemia). The diagnosis can be done by measuring the blood pressure in the supine position, sitting and standing position, and by 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The first line of treatment is non-drug therapies . The most frequently used medical treatments are midodrine, and fludrocortisone. However specific molecules as droxidopa, pyridostigmine, erythropoietin can also sometimes be indicated.

L'hypotension artérielle est une condition fréquente. Elle génère de nombreuses consultations et est responsable d'un nombre important d'hospitalisations, surtout chez les patients âgés. Elle est associée à une augmentation des risques de morbidité et de mortalité. L'hypotension artérielle peut être constitutionnelle, liée à un syndrome, orthostatique, ou le plus souvent secondaire (médicamenteuse, baisse de la volémie). Le diagnostic se fait par une mesure de la tension artérielle en position couchée/assise et debout, voire une mesure de la tension artérielle de 24 heures. Le traitement de première ligne est non pharmacologique. Le traitement médicamenteux comprend essentiellement la midodrine et la fludrocortisone. Certains traitements plus spécifiques, droxidopa, érythropoïétine, pyridostigmine peuvent avoir aussi leur place.

Integrated analysis of droxidopa trials for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Droxidopa, a prodrug of norepinephrine, was approved for treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) due to primary autonomic disorders based on 3 randomized double-blind studies. We performed safety and efficacy analyses of this pooled dataset (n = 460). METHODS: Efficacy was assessed using Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) scores (composite and individual items). Safety and tolerability were also examined. RESULTS: Droxidopa improved virtually all nOH symptom scores compared with placebo, significantly reducing OHQ composite score (-2.68 ± 2.20 vs -1.82 ± 2.34 units; P < 0.001), dizziness/lightheadedness score (-3.0 ± 2.9 vs -1.8 ± 3.1 units; P < 0.001), and 3 of 5 other symptom assessments (visual disturbances, weakness, and fatigue [P ≤ 0.010]). Droxidopa significantly improved 3 of 4 measures of activities of daily living (standing a long time, walking a short time, and walking a long time [P ≤ 0.003]) and significantly increased upright systolic blood pressure (11.5 ± 20.5 vs 4.8 ± 21.0 mmHg for placebo; P < 0.001). Droxidopa was effective in patients using inhibitors of dopa decarboxylase (DDCI; the enzyme that converts droxidopa to norepinephrine), but its efficacy was numerically greater in non-DDCI users. Droxidopa was well-tolerated. Rates of most adverse events were similar between groups. Supine hypertension rates were low, but slightly higher in patients receiving droxidopa (≤7.9% vs ≤4.6% for placebo); patients with severe hypertension at screening were excluded from these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Droxidopa is effective for the treatment of nOH in patients with primary autonomic disorders and is generally well-tolerated. A longer trial is underway to confirm efficacy beyond the ≤2 to 10 - week period assessed in the current trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00782340 , first received October 29, 2008; NCT00633880 , first received March 5, 2008; and NCT01176240 , first received July 30, 2010.

Droxidopa in the Treatment of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a constellation of signs and symptoms that occur when a patient is upright and relieved by recumbence. Currently, no drugs are labeled for the treatment for POTS. Droxidopa is an orally administered amino acid that is converted to norepinephrine and thought to improve both blood pressure and symptoms in patients with orthostatic intolerance. STUDY QUESTION: To appraise the effect of Droxidopa in a clinical setting in patients with POTS refractory to other forms of treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of patients with POTS at our Syncope and Autonomic Disorders Center. Three hundred fifty-two patients were screened, 54 of them were prescribed Droxidopa and found to be eligible to include in our study. MEASURES AND OUTCOME: Symptoms of orthostatic intolerance, side effects of therapy and response to treatment. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS software. Thirty-seven patients were included in data analysis. Patients who failed to follow up, didn't obtain Droxidopa due to insurance and cost concerns, had hypertensive response to therapy or had allergic reaction were excluded from data analysis. RESULTS: The most frequently reported symptom was dizziness in 91.9% of patients, followed by syncope and fatigue in 70.3% and 67.6% of patients, respectively. Symptoms of dizziness, syncope and fatigue were reported less after treatment; 75.7%, 51.4% and 40.5%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in standing or sitting blood pressure before and after treatment. Despite the improvement in some symptoms. Only 27% of patients reported improved quality of life after treatment. Of total, 40.5% of patients stopped the treatment either due to side effects or ineffectiveness. CONCLUSION: Droxidopa appears to improve some symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in patients with POTS but has diminutive impact on quality of life and blood pressure. Further assessment in large clinical trials is needed to evaluate its efficacy.

The Treatment of Primary Orthostatic Hypotension.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies used to treat primary orthostatic hypotension (OH). DATA SOURCES: A literature review using PubMed and MEDLINE databases searching hypotension, non-pharmacological therapy, midodrine, droxidopa, pyridostigmine, fludrocortisone, atomoxetine, pseudoephedrine, and octreotide was performed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized or observational studies, cohorts, case series, or case reports written in English between January 1970 and November 2016 that assessed primary OH treatment in adult patients were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Based on the chosen criteria, it was found that OH patients make up approximately 15% of all syncope patients, predominantly as a result of cardiovascular or neurological insults, or offending medication. Nonpharmacological strategies are the primary treatment, such as discontinuing offending medications, switching medication administration to bedtime, avoiding large carbohydrate-rich meals, limiting alcohol, maintaining adequate hydration, adding salt to diet, and so on. If these fail, pharmacotherapy can help ameliorate symptoms, including midodrine, droxidopa, fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, atomoxetine, sympathomimetic agents, and octreotide. CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine and droxidopa possess the most evidence with respect to increasing blood pressure and alleviating symptoms. Pyridostigmine and fludrocortisone can be used in patients who fail to respond to these agents. Emerging evidence with low-dose atomoxetine is promising, especially in those with central autonomic failure, and may prove to be a viable alternative treatment option. Data surrounding other therapies such as sympathomimetic agents or octreotide are minimal. Medication management of primary OH should be guided by patient-specific factors, such as tolerability, adverse effects, and drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.