A multi-institutional prospective observational study to compare postoperative quality of life of patients who undergo total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (CCOG1602).

BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for treating early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. However, advantages of PG in postoperative quality of life (QOL) over total gastrectomy (TG) has not fully proven. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional prospective observational study (CCOG1602) of patients who undergo TG or PG for cStage I gastric cancer. We used the PGSAS-37 and EORTC-QLQ-C30 to evaluate the changes in body weight and QOL over a 3-year postoperative period. The primary endpoint was the weight loss rate 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: We enrolled 109 patients from 18 institutions and selected 65 and 19 patients for inclusion in the TG and PG groups, respectively. Mean postoperative weight loss rates were 16.0% and 11.7% for the TG and PG groups, respectively (p = 0.056, Cohen's d 0.656) during postoperative year 1% and 15.0% and 10.8% for TG and PG (p = 0.068, Cohen's d 0.543), respectively, during postoperative year 3, indicating that the PG group achieved a better trend with a moderate effect size. According to the PGSAS-37, the PG group experienced a better trend in the indigestion subscale (p < 0.001, Cohen's d -1.085) and total symptom score (p = 0.050, Cohen's d -0.59) during postoperative year 3 compared with the TG group. In contrast, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 detected no difference between the groups at any time point during 3-year postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates that PG tended to be more favorable compared with TG with respect to postoperative weight loss and QOL, particularly regarding indigestion.

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy effective in relieving dyspepsia in patients of cholelithiasis? A prospective study.

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is routinely done for symptomatic gallstone disease; however, its role in relieving dyspeptic symptoms in cholelithiasis is controversial. Aim: The study was designed to assess the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relieving dyspeptic symptoms in patients having cholelithiasis with only dyspeptic symptoms. Methods: Patients with cholelithiasis having only dyspeptic symptoms not attributable to other causes (like Helicobacter pylori) were subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dyspepsia scores (Dyspepsia Severity Assessment Score-DSAS and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index- GIQLI) were measured before and after surgery and analyzed using Greenhouse-Geisser, McNemar's and ANOVA tests. Results: 27 patients (M:F=1:26, mean age=40.48±10.60 years) having dyspepsia with asymptomatic gallstones were included in the study. There was significant improvement in DSAS (20.11±4.36 vs 28.63±3.42; p<0.001) and GIQLI(106.11±5.77 vs 122.56±7.95; p<0.001) after 2 months of LC. All symptoms improved individually; relief in early satiety and vomiting was the maximum (outcome benefit ratios=0.954, p=0.007 and 0.937, p=0.005 respectively). Multiple gallstones caused more dyspepsia than single (p=0.005). There was no significant difference between H. pylori positive and negative groups in terms of improvement of DSAS and GIQLI scores after LC (p=0.897 and p=0.375 respectively; however dyspepsia was seen to improve significantly within both groups). Conclusion: Dyspepsia may be a symptom of gallstone disease, and these patients can benefit from LC especially when early satiety and vomiting are the main symptoms. A larger sample size may offer more insight.

Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on gastric emptying and dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease. Nonresolution of dyspepsia postoperatively is of major concern nowadays. The present study was conducted to study the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on gastric emptying in symptomatic gallstone disease using (99m)Tc sulfur colloid scintigraphy. This pilot study sought to obtain preliminary data and to establish a base for further detailed study. METHODS: A total of 25 patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic gallstone disease scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. All patients underwent gastric scintigraphic emptying study preoperatively and 2 weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done as a day care procedure. RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation preoperative gastric percentage clearance was 51.36 ± 12.67%. Preoperative gastric emptying half-time was 62.72 ± 21.59 min. Forty percent of patients experienced dyspeptic symptoms before surgery. Twenty-four percent of patients had dyspeptic symptoms during postoperative follow-up at 2 weeks. Postoperative percentage gastric clearance was 49.92 ± 13.17%. Postoperative gastric emptying half-time was 64.12 ± 19.13 min. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on gastric emptying parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not alter gastric emptying or stomach percentage clearance in gallstone patients who have preoperative delayed gastric emptying on scintigraphy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has no effect on gastric emptying in symptomatic gallstone patients.

Patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and remission of type 2 diabetes 3 years after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (Oseberg); a single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the comparative effects of various bariatric procedures on patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to compare 3-year effects of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported outcome measures in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The Oseberg trial was a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised trial at Vestfold Hospital Trust, a public tertiary obesity centre in Tønsberg, Norway. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously verified BMI 35·0 kg/m2 or greater. Diabetes was diagnosed if glycated haemoglobin was at least 6·5% (48 mmol/mol) or by their use of anti-diabetic medications with glycated haemoglobin at least 6·1% (43 mmol/mol). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. All patients received identical preoperative and postoperative treatment. Randomisation was done with a computerised random number generator and a block size of ten. Study personnel, patients, and the primary outcome assessor were blinded to allocations for 1 year. The prespecified secondary outcomes reported here were 3-year changes in several clinically important patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and diabetes remission. Analyses were done in the intention to treat population. This trial is ongoing, closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01778738. FINDINGS: Between Oct 15, 2012 and Sept 1, 2017, 319 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes scheduled for bariatric surgery were assessed for eligibility. 101 patients were not eligible (29 did not have type 2 diabetes according to inclusion criteria and 72 other exclusion criteria) and 93 declined to participate. 109 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy (n=55) or gastric bypass (n=54). 72 (66%) of 109 patients were female and 37 (34%) were male. 104 (95%) of patients were White. 16 patients were lost to follow up and 93 (85%) patients completed the 3-year follow-up. Three additional patients were contacted by phone for registration of comorbidities Compared with sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass was associated with a greater improvement in weight-related quality of life (between group difference 9·4, 95% CI 3·3 to 15·5), less reflux symptoms (0·54, 0·17 to -0·90), greater total bodyweight loss (8% difference, 25% vs 17%), and a higher probability of diabetes remission (67% vs 33%, risk ratio 2·00; 95% CI 1·27 to 3·14). Five patients reported postprandial hypoglycaemia in the third year after gastric bypass versus none after sleeve-gastrectomy (p=0·059). Symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping syndrome, depression, binge eating, and appetitive drive did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: At 3 years, gastric bypass was superior to sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity regarding weight related quality of life, reflux symptoms, weight loss, and remission of diabetes, while symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping, depression and binge eating did not differ between groups. This new patient-reported knowledge can be used in the shared decision-making process to inform patients about similarities and differences between expected outcomes after the two surgical procedures. FUNDING: Morbid Obesity Centre, Vestfold Hospital Trust. TRANSLATION: For the Norwegian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Isolated food intolerance after adjustable gastric banding: a major cause of long-term band removal.

BACKGROUND: Erosion, slippage, and esophageal dilatation have been acknowledged as typical long-term issues after lap banding. Yet it seems from our experience that isolated food intolerance has become a leading cause for band removal, although not reported as such in the literature. METHODS: There were 1,450 patients who have been operated on over 12 years (May 1995-May 2007). Food intolerance occurred in 41 cases (2.9%), representing 1/3 of the causes of band removal. The average time for diagnosis was 58 months (16-110). Seventeen cases occurred before 5 years of follow-up, and 25 after. RESULTS: The postoperative course has been uneventful in all cases of simple removal. No patient had re-banding after removal, one had vertical banded gastroplasty in another center, two a gastric bypass, one a BPD, and four had a sleeve gastrectomy at the same operative time as band removal. Food intolerance is rarely reported in the literature, or often attributed to "poor compliance" or "poor results" after lap banding. The background and symptoms of this entity should be separated from other issues, i.e., esophageal dilatation and band slippage. Gastric bypass is a valuable option after band removal, but like others, we prefer sleeve gastrectomy as a second step procedure, given the weight loss that has already been achieved in many cases. CONCLUSION: Food intolerance after lap-banding is likely to represent the most common cause for band removal in the long run, although we do not know its future rate. From the literature and our experience, there is no clear cause to this complication in the majority of the cases; neither the type of band nor the type of procedure are sufficient explanations.

Gastric emptying before and after cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of the present study was to measure gastric emptying time of solids and semisolids in dyspeptic individuals with cholecystolithiasis before and 6 months after cholecystectomy in order to determine whether cholecystectomy interferes with gastric emptying. METHODOLOGY: A prospective, self-pairing study was conducted on 29 patients selected according to appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria. Gastric emptying time of solids and semisolids was determined before and six months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the 13C-octanoic acid and 13C-acetate breath tests, respectively. The samples were analyzed by infrared spectrometry. The gastric retention time (lag phase) and gastric emptying half-time of solid and semisolid were determined and the results obtained before and after surgery were compared in the same patient. In addition, the effects of surgery on dyspeptic symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences (p>0.05) in gastric retention time and gastric emptying half-time of solid and semisolid test meals were observed before and after cholecystectomy. Dyspeptic symptoms (pain, upper abdominal gases, early satiety, nausea and vomiting) improved after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not interfere with the gastric emptying time of solids or semisolids in dyspeptic individuals with cholecystolithiasis.

Case Report: Severe back pain, epigastric distress and refractory nausea; an unusual presentation of mediastinal bronchogenic cyst.

Background: Bronchogenic cysts are congenital malformations from abnormal budding of embryonic foregut and tracheobronchial tree. We present a case of bronchogenic cyst with severe back pain, epigastric distress and refractory nausea and vomiting.   Case Presentation: A 44-year-old Hispanic female presented with a 3-week history of recurrent sharp interscapular pain radiating to epigastrium with refractory nausea and vomiting. She underwent cholecystectomy 2-years ago. Computed tomography (CT) abdomen at that time showed a subcarinal mass measuring 5.4 X 5.0 cm. Subsequent endoscopic ultrasound diagnosed it as a bronchogenic cyst. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided aspiration resulted in incomplete drainage and she was discharged after partial improvement. Current physical examination showed tachycardia and tachypnea with labs showing leukocytosis, elevated inflammatory markers, and hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis. CT chest showed an increased size of the bronchogenic cyst (9.64 X 7.7 cm) suggestive of possible partial cyst rupture or infected cyst. X-ray esophagram ruled out esophageal compression or contrast extravasation. Patient's symptoms were refractory to conservative management. The patient ultimately underwent right thoracotomy with cyst excision that resulted in complete resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: Bronchogenic cysts are the most common primary cysts of mediastinum with the prevalence of 6%. The most common symptoms are chest pain, dyspnea, cough, and stridor. Diagnosis is made by chest X-Ray and CT chest. Magnetic resonance imaging chest and EBUS are more sensitive and specific. Symptomatic cysts should be resected unless surgical risks are high. Asymptomatic cysts in younger patients should be removed due to low surgical risk and potential late complications. Watchful waiting has been recommended for asymptomatic adults or high-risk patients. This case presents mediastinal bronchogenic cyst as a cause of back, nausea and refractory vomiting. Immediate surgical excision in such cases should be attempted, which will lead to resolution of symptoms and avoidance of complications.

Laparoscopic sleeve resection of a recurrent gastric cascade: a case report.

The cascade stomach consists of a biloculation of the gastric cavity into a ventral (corpus and antrum) and a dorsal (fundus) recess and is a rare cause of upper abdominal symptoms. The causes of gastric cascade described in the literature are manifold and are separated into congenital, functional, or organic disorders. Patients with a gastric cascade can have a range of upper abdominal symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, eructation, heartburn, epigastric pain, and early satiety. This disorder is often difficult to diagnose or is not recognized and, therefore, its true incidence is currently not known. As a consequence, data on the treatment of the condition are limited. Suggested treatment options in the literature range from conservative measures, such as bending exercises or dietary adjustments, to operative corrections, such as gastropexy and laparoscopic gastro-gastric anastomosis. In this paper, we summarize the literature findings on gastric cascade and report on a new treatment option: the laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection.

Gastric lipoma: an unusual cause of dyspeptic symptoms.

Gastric lipomas are rare tumours accounting for 2-3% of all benign gastric tumours. These are usually submucosal in origin but in rare cases may be subserosal in origin. Although a majority of gastric lipomas are asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally, occasionally these can cause abdominal pain, dyspeptic disorders, obstruction, invagination and haemorrhages. In the literature, only 200 cases of gastric lipomas have been reported so far. We report a case of a 56-year-old female with a submucosal symptomatic gastric lipoma presenting with disabling dyspeptic symptoms.

[Guideline "Dyspepsia"]. / Richtlijn 'Maagklachten'.

For the management of patients with dyspepsia a multidisciplinary working party has made recommendations, i.e. about indications for prompt endoscopy, the management of dyspeptic complaints of recent onset, the application of diagnostic tests and treatment of recurrent dyspepsia and the indications for long term use of acid suppressants. Endoscopy is indicated in every patient with alarm symptoms, i.e. blood loss, dysphagia, weight loss or anemia in combination with dyspepsia. Age alone is not a decisive factor in this. Given the good prognosis of recent onset dyspepsia, the application of diagnostic tests is generally not required. Treatment should be restricted to antacids or H2 receptor antagonists. Only in case of persistent or recurring complaints, diagnostic tests or another treatment (Helitobacter pylori diagnostic tests, empirical treatment or endoscopy) should be considered. Testing for H. pylori is especially effective in patients at risk for peptic ulcer disease: those with recurrent complaints, and those with a history of peptic ulcer, without typical reflux symptoms or those with a history ofpeptic ulcer. Short term empirical treatment with a proton pump inhibitor is especially effective in patients with typical reflux symptoms. Endoscopy is the only way to rule out malignancy, and should be used to solve serious diagnostic uncertainty in patient or physician. The only indication for continuous proton pump inhibitor treatment is severe oesophagitis. All other patients with less severe reflux disease should preferably be treated on either on demand or intermittent basis. Long term proton pump inhibitor treatment is not indicated for patients with peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia.

Clinical results of reoperation after failed highly selective vagotomy.

The results after reoperation after failed highly selective vagotomy during a 10 year period have been reviewed retrospectively. Forty of 306 patients (13 percent) underwent reoperation due to recurrent ulcer (25 patients), severe dyspepsia without proved recurrence (12 patients), and gastric stasis without recurrence (3 patients). In the first two groups, 16 patients had a second vagotomy and 17 underwent partial gastrectomy, 10 with gastroduodenostomy and 7 with gastrojejunostomy. The need for a second reoperation was disquietingly high after both revagotomy (5 of 16 patients) and partial gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy (4 of 10 patients). These results contrasted with a successful outcome in all seven patients who underwent reoperation with partial gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy. At the time of follow-up, 85 percent of the reoperated patients (34 of 40 patients) were in Visick grade 1 or 2 as determined by their own judgement.

Quality of life before and after laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication is a well-established surgical option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes from the patient's point of view by using a validated quality of life instrument. METHODS: Fifty patients have been prospectively included. All patients underwent a standardized 270-degree posterior fundoplication. Quality of life was measured by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), a 36-item-questionnaire. The patients received the questionnaire before surgery, and 3 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative score was 95.6+/-21 points. The score increased significantly (P <0.0005) at 3 months (103.6+/-16) and 1 year (111.4+/-22) after surgery. This improvement concerned the four domains of the questionnaire (symptoms, social functioning, physical status, and emotions). The score in patients at 1 year remained, however, significantly lower than that in healthy persons (126+/-18). CONCLUSIONS: GIQLI is a sensitive tool to assess surgical outcomes after fundoplication. The quality of life after surgery did not reach the level of healthy population, not because of failure of surgery to treat GERD but probably because of functional dyspepsia that was present prior to surgery and did not change after fundoplication.

Cost-effectiveness and long-term impact of Helicobacter pylori 'test and treat' service in reducing open access endoscopy referrals.

INTRODUCTION: We have shown that the introduction of a carbon urea breath test (13C-UBT) service for Helicobacter pylori screening and eradication is effective in reducing the rate of open access endoscopy referrals in patients aged < 40 years in the short term. This has been substantiated by several randomized controlled trials comparing a 'test and treat' strategy with early endoscopy in these patients. However, the long-term impact of such a strategy is not established. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the influence of 13C-UBT services on open access endoscopy referral rates in dyspeptic patients under the age of 40 years over a period of 5 years. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of open access endoscopy referral rates between August 1990 and July 2000. Cost minimization analysis was performed with a Decision Analysis Model using Treeage Data 3.5. RESULTS: The total number of open access referrals for endoscopy during 1990-1995 was between 765 and 1325 per year. The proportion of endoscopies performed in patients < 40 years ranged between 33.4% and 34.6%. The total number of endoscopy referrals during 1995-2000 after the introduction of the 13C-UBT services was between 1178 and 1321 per year. However, there was a sustained reduction in the proportion of patients aged < 40 years, ranging between 23.2% and 26.2% (Chi2 = 153.9, degrees of freedom = 9, P < 0.0001) during this period. CONCLUSIONS: The H. pylori screening and treatment strategy using the 13C-UBT service results in a sustained reduction of the number of endoscopy referrals and is cost effective in dyspeptic patients under the age of 40 years, enabling better utilization of available resources.

Gastric lipoma presenting with dyspepsia.

Gastric lipoma is one of the rare benign gastric tumors. Its preoperative diagnosis obviates the need of an extended gastrectomy. We report a case of gastric lipoma who presented with symptoms of dyspepsia and was treated by surgical gastrectomy and tumour enucleation.

Rate and yield of repeat upper endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia.

AIM: To determine the rate and yield of repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for dyspepsia in clinical practice, whether second opinions drive its use, and whether it is performed at the expense of colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent repeat EGD for dyspepsia from 1996 to 2006 at the University of California, San Francisco endoscopy service. RESULTS: Of 24,780 EGDs, 5460 (22%) were performed for dyspepsia in 4873 patients. Of these, 451 patients (9.3%) underwent repeat EGD for dyspepsia at a median 1.7 (interquartile range, 0.8-3.1) years after initial EGD. Significant findings possibly related to dyspepsia were more likely at initial (29%) vs repeat EGD (18%) [odds ratio (OR), 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.75, P < 0.0001], and at repeat EGD if the initial EGD had reported such findings (26%) than if it had not (14%) (OR, 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08-1.62, P = 0.0015). The same endoscopist performed the repeat and initial EGD in 77% of cases. Of patients aged 50 years or older, 286/311 (92%) underwent lower endoscopy. CONCLUSION: Repeat EGD for dyspepsia occurred at a low but substantial rate, with lower yield than initial EGD. Optimizing endoscopy use remains a public health priority.

Peptic ulcer disease in dyspeptic patients with ischemic heart disease: search and treat?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in dyspeptic patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), and to assess whether the healing of PUD before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) could reduce the need for urgent postoperative endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 894 patients referred to Dubrava University Hospital in Zagreb for elective CABG during the period from May 1998 until April 2001 was prospectively analysed. Dyspepsia was assessed by a questionnaire, PUD by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and H. pylori status by histology/Giemsa staining and the rapid urease test. The need for urgent postoperative endoscopy (hematemesis and/or melena, sudden onset of anemia or unexplained epigastric pain) was compared between the prospective study group of 894 patients and a series of 463 patients referred for CABG to Dubrava University Hospital during the period from January 1997 until April 1998. RESULTS: Gastroduodenal dyspepsia predominated in 184 (20.6 %) patients, 142 (77.2 %) of them with Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection and 69 (37.5 %) with verified PUD. Univariate analysis indicated the increased risk of multiple PUD to be related to a previous diagnosis of PUD (OR 3.61, 95 % CI 1.32 - 9.82), H. pylori infection (OR 18.86, 95 % CI 2.31 - 153.98), use of aspirin (OR 5.70; 95 % CI 1.80 - 18.03) and left coronary artery occlusions (3.10, 95 % CI 1.00 - 9.59). Multivariate analysis pointed to H. pylori infection (OR 16.30, 95 % CI 1.57 - 168.53) and left coronary artery occlusions (OR 4.84, 95 % CI 1.05 - 22.30) as independent risk factors for multiple PUD. The OR for urgent postoperative endoscopy due to a major gastrointestinal event was 9.9 (95 % CI 2.2 - 45.1) and the OR for active peptic ulcer with stigmata of recent bleeding was 6.9 (95 % CI 1.4 - 33.1) in the group of patients with IHD who were not submitted to evaluation for dyspepsia prior to elective heart surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In areas with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, endoscopy and a "search and treat" strategy for IHD patients with dyspepsia before elective cardiac surgery should significantly reduce the need for urgent postoperative endoscopy due to major gastrointestinal events.

Helicobacter pylori test-and-eradicate versus prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Strategies based on screening for Helicobacter pylori to manage dyspeptic patients in primary care have been proposed, but the clinical consequences are unclear. We did a randomised trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a test-and-eradicate strategy compared with prompt endoscopy in the management of patients with dyspepsia. METHODS: 500 patients presenting in primary care with dyspepsia (> or = 2 weeks of epigastric pain, no alarm symptoms) were assigned H. pylori testing plus eradication therapy or endoscopy. Symptoms, quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and use of resources were recorded during 1 year of follow-up. FINDINGS: 250 patients were assigned test-and-eradicate, and 250 prompt endoscopy. The median age was 45 years and 28% were H. pylori infected. 1 year follow-up was completed by 447 patients. We found no differences in symptoms between the two groups (median registered days without dyspeptic symptoms=0.63 [IQR 0.27-0.81] in the test-and-eradicate group vs 0.67 [0.36-0.86] in the prompt endoscopy group; mean difference 0.04 [95% CI -0.01-0.10], p=0.12). Nor did we find any difference in quality of life or numbers of sick-leave days, visits to general practitioners, or hospital admissions. In the test-and-eradicate group, 27 (12%) of the patients were dissatisfied with management, compared with eight (4%) in the endoscopy group (p=0.013). After 1 year, the use of endoscopies in the test-and-eradicate group was 0.40 times (95% CI 0.31-0.51) the use in the endoscopy group, the use of H. pylori tests increased by a factor of 8.1 (5.7-13.1), the use of eradication treatments increased by a factor of 1.5 (0.9-2.7), and the use of proton-pump inhibitors was 0.89 (0.59-1.33) times the use in the endoscopy group. 43 (91% [80-98%]) of 47 peptic-ulcer patients would have been identified by endoscopy or treated by eradication therapy. INTERPRETATION: A H. pylori test-and-eradicate strategy is as efficient and safe as prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients in primary care, although fewer patients are satisfied with their treatment.

[Gallstone dyspepsia--a myth?]. / Die Gallensteindyspepsie--ein Mythos?

Gallstones accompanied by dyspeptic symptoms, were long not considered to be silent. The complaints were thought to be caused by the gallstones, and were termed gallstone dyspepsia. Up to 47% of all cholecystectomies are performed for dyspeptic symptoms. Numerous control studies have, however, all demonstrated that dyspeptic symptoms in stone carriers and controls with no gallstones occur with equally frequency, and that it is not possible to differentiate gallstone-specific dyspepsia. The frequent concomitance of dyspepsia and gallstones, is coincidental, and there is no causality involved. Thus, gallstones accompanied by dyspepsia must be considered silent stones. Not the silent gallstone, but gallstone dyspepsia is the myth.