Patients' Experiences During Carotid Endarterectomy Performed Under Local Anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To describe patients' experiences undergoing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local anesthesia. DESIGN: Explorative qualitative design. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 15 participants who had undergone CEA under local anesthesia, analyzed by content analysis. FINDINGS: Undergoing CEA under local anesthesia entails enduring stress with no possibility of withdrawal. Patients' lack of understanding of local anesthesia and experiencing pain and discomfort caused feelings of stress. The surgery resulted in a loss of control; patients had to surrender their autonomy to someone else. The nurse anesthetist was the link to the world outside the operating room (OR), and that nurse conveyed feelings of safety and security during the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' experiences ranged from being pleased with the surgical procedure and local anesthesia to vowing never to undergo such a procedure again. It is important to focus on the patients' experiences and feelings when choosing a method of anesthesia.

Patients with carotid atherosclerosis who underwent or did not undergo carotid endarterectomy: outcome on mood, cognition and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: To compare the six-month outcome on mood, cognition and quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis (CA) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with subjects who refused treatment. METHODS: Cohort study on consecutive inpatients with CA (stenosis ≥ 50 %) (N = 46; age 72.56 ± 7.26; male 65.2 %). Intervention cohort: subjects who decided to undergo CEA (N = 35); Control cohort patients who refused CEA (N = 11). DSM-IV-Psychiatric diagnosis made by clinicians using interviews, QoL measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); cognitive performance by WAIS Intelligent Coefficient (IC). RESULTS: The study showed a better improvement during six months in Overall IC, Performance IC and Verbal IC in the group that underwent CEA. QoL in the two cohorts did not reach statistical significance. Percentages of patients who improved in the CEA group were significantly higher with regard to Overall and Verbal IC scores, and at the limits of statistical significance in Performance IC. The differences of subject with improvement in SF-12 score in the two groups did not reach statistical significance. Ages below 68 were found to be determinant of a good outcome in Overall IC score. Limit: study conducted with a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis who underwent CEA enhanced their cognitive performance.

Patients' Views on Regional Anesthesia for Elective Unilateral Carotid Endarterectomy--A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed under general anesthesia (GA) or locoregional anesthesia (LA). However, the patients' views on the choice between GA and LA are currently poorly understood. We aimed at identifying the preoperative patient information needs, their role in decision-making, and influencing factors associated with LA and anxiety regarding surgery and anesthesia in CEA as a base for improving preoperative consultation and decision-making in the informed consent process. METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing unilateral elective CEA. Data on basic demographics, preoperative information needs, factors influencing decision-making concerning anesthesia technique, a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T/S) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the study, 10 women and 49 men, with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range, 66-77 years). Fifty-four (92%) patients assessed the surgeons' given information as adequate. Older patients (>70 years, n = 31) had less self-conception of anxiety compared to younger patients (≤70 years, n = 28), 3% vs. 21%, P = 0.045. Males expressed less anxiety regarding "waking up during general anesthesia" compared to females (0% vs. 30%, P < 0.001). Anxiety about anesthesia and surgery as measured by VAS highly correlated with the STAI-S scores (Pearson correlation coefficient [CC], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.66, P < 0.001; CC, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.66, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with a lower cognitive function (MMSE ≤27, n = 20) had lower needs for preoperative medical information compared to patients with MMSE >27 (n = 36), 0% vs. 15%, P = 0.042. Two (3%) patients received GA because of their previous bad experience with LA. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and female patients may benefit from a more detailed and reassuring informed consent process. All institutions should use procedure-specific informed consent forms as they appear to be very adequate for the patient information needs. Nearly all patients are willing to undergo LA with the exception of those having had previous bad experience with LA for CEA.

Stress Management in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress is common to patients submitted to cardiovascular operations. The purpose of this pilot, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of a stress management program (SMP) on patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A sample of 24 patients with significant (>70%) carotid stenosis was finally randomized to SMP (intervention group; n = 12) or no-stress management intervention (control group; n = 12) before CEA. SMP consisted of 2 relaxation techniques (relaxation-breathing and guided imagery) before and 8 weeks after CEA. Measurements included Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Health Locus of Control Scale (HLC), and blood pressure and heart rate. RESULTS: The 2 groups did not differ in terms of demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, and baseline psychometric measurements. No delay on the time of surgery was caused by the practice of the relaxation techniques. Both perceived stress and anxiety improved within the intervention group at the end of the program (P = 0.005 and P = 0.007, respectively). No improvement in PSS-14, HLC, and HADS scores were documented in control group at the end of the 8-week follow-up period. The intervention group had lower PSS-14 scores at 8 weeks after CEA (median PSS-14 score, 20 points; range, 10-28) compared with control group (median PSS, 25 points; range, 11-47; P = 0.026). No significant effect of SMP was found for blood pressure and heart rate measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that relaxation techniques appear to be beneficial in terms of stress and anxiety reduction in patients undergoing CEA. These findings require independent confirmation in the setting of a larger, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

[MONITORING OF CEREBRAL OXYGENATION AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY: THE ROLE OF TRANSIENT BYPASS OF CAROTID ARTERY].

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEE) is an effective surgical technique to prevent cerebral ischemia and stroke, but can be associated with intervention-related complications. The surgical shunting of the intervention area may reduce the risk of the intraoperative ipsilateral cerebral ischemia following the carotid artery clamping but is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) and early changes of cognitive functions in CEE in the settings of transient vascular bypass and without this method. METHODS: 45 adult patients were randomized to either the bypass group (the Bypass group, n = 24) or the Controls / No Bypass (the Control group, n = 21). All patients were monitored for invasive arterial pressure, SpO, EtCO,, and cerebral oxygenation (SctO2, Fore-Sight, CASMED, USA) over the contra- and ipsilateral frontal head areas. The cognitive functions were assessed using series of Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA) before the intervention, and on 6 and 36 hrs after the CEE. RESULTS: We did not find intergroup differences in the surgery duration, degree of stenosis and baseline cognitive function. The values of SctO2 reduced significantly only above contralateral side; these changes were attenuated in the shunt group. There were no intergroup differences in postoperative cognitive function. CONCLUSION: Empiric transient vascular bypass during carotid endarterectomy did not result in significant changes of the ipsilateral cerebral oxygenation, hyperperfusion and cognitive function, but attenuated the decrease of SctO2 over the contralateral hemisphere.

Reasons underlying the consent to endovascular treatment, displayed by patients diagnosed with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) has gained popularity in recent years. Offering CAS, which is a controversial treatment in asymptomatic disease, may provoke patient distrust of the diagnosis and intervention benefit. The aim of this study was to prove that asymptomatic ICAS patients tend to show an emotional attitude to their illness, and therefore their decisions regarding carotid artery stenting are externally motivated and assessed emotionally. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was conducted by a questionnaire consisting of 18 half-open questions (obtained from 25 consecutive patients) in categories of self-image, attitude to illness, and decision-making regarding CAS. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Reaction: "Nothing to worry about - every illness can be cured" evidenced the rational attitude to the disease. Attitude towards oneself after receiving the unexpected information about the disease did not change. Most patients pursued a second opinion before the intervention. Most patients showed internal motivation (78.7%). Rational assessment of the decision on CAS relied on consulting and insights into the disease and the intervention-related risk compared to risk of "doing nothing" CONCLUSIONS: In decision-making about CAS by asymptomatic patients, the emotional attitude to disease and negative expectations pertaining to postoperative health lead to an internally-motivated and rationally assessed decision. At least 2 conversations with the patient should be scheduled. The primary purpose of the second visit should be dissipating any doubts and repeating the arguments for the intervention. Patients should be provided with an appropriate amount of information to reduce their fear of neurological complications and mental disturbances. Conversation should be concentrated on life-quality improvement instead of controversies about the intervention.

The effect of carotid endarterectomy on cerebral blood flow and cognitive function.

BACKGROUND: The effect of carotid endarterectomy on cognitive function is not fully understood. This study aims to characterize changes in cerebral blood flow after carotid endarterectomy and to determine if patients with improvement in cerebral blood flow have improved cognitive function after endarterectomy. METHODS: Cerebral blood flow was measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively using phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Preoperative flow impairment was defined as ipsilateral flow at least 20% less than contralateral flow. Improvement in flow was defined as an absolute increase of at least 0.10 in flow ratio from pre- to postoperative assessments. Patients underwent cognitive testing preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with unilateral carotid stenosis were enrolled from 3 sites. Preoperative internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow impairment was observed in 50% and 22% of patients, respectively. Patients with preoperative flow impairment had an average of 0.25 and 0.16 absolute improvement in flow ratio in the ICA and MCA vessels, respectively; this was statistically significant for patients with baseline ICA flow impairment (P < .01). One hundred percent of patients with improvement in MCA flow had a significant improvement in attention compared to 56% of patients without MCA flow improvement (P = .06). Clinically significant improvements in all 4 cognitive domains were observed at 1 year (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with baseline impairment of MCA blood flow were more likely to experience improvement in flow after revascularization. Improvement in MCA blood flow was associated with greater cognitive improvement in attention and executive functioning.

Stress management training for surgeons-a randomized, controlled, intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Stress and coping influence performance. In this study, we evaluate a novel stress management intervention for surgeons. METHODS: A randomized control group design was used. Sixteen surgeons were allocated to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group received training on coping strategies, mental rehearsal, and relaxation. Performance measures were obtained during simulated operations and included objective-structured assessment of technical skill, observational teamwork assessment for surgery, and end product assessment rated by experts. Stress was assessed using the state-trait-anxiety-inventory, observer rating, coefficient of heart rate variability (C_HRV), and salivary cortisol. The number of applied surgical coping strategies (number of coping strategies [NC]) was assessed using a questionnaire. A t test for paired samples investigated any within-subject changes, and multiple linear regression analysis explored between-subject effects. Interviews explored surgeons' perceptions of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group showed enhanced observational teamwork assessment for surgery performance (t = -2.767, P < 0.05), and increased coping skills (t = -4.690, P < 0.01), and reduced stress reflected inheart rate variability (t = -4.008, P < 0.01). No significant changes were identified in the control group. Linear regression analysis confirmed a significant effect on NC (ß = -0.739, P < 0.01). Qualitative data analysis revealed improved technical skills, decision making, and confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had beneficial effects on coping, stress, and nontechnical skills during simulated surgery.

The effects of stress and coping on surgical performance during simulations.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effects of surgeons' stress levels and coping strategies on surgical performance during simulated operations. METHODS: Thirty surgeons carried out each a non-crisis and a crisis scenario of a simulated operation. Surgeons' stress levels were assessed by several measures: self-assessments and observer ratings of stress, heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol. Coping strategies were explored qualitatively and quantified to a coping score. Experience in surgery was included as an additional predictor. Outcome measures consisted of technical surgical skills using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), nontechnical surgical skills using Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS), and the quality of the operative end product using End Product Assessment (EPA). Uni- and multivariate linear regression were used to assess the independent effects of predictor variables on each performance measure. RESULTS: During the non-crisis simulation, a high coping score and experience significantly enhanced EPA (beta1, 0.279; 0.009-0.460; P= 0.04; beta2, 0.571; 4.328-12.669, P< 0.001; respectively). During the crisis simulation, a significant beneficial effect of the interaction of high experience and low stress on all performance measures was found (EPA: beta, 0.537; 2.079-8.543; OSATS: beta, 0.707; 8.708-17.860; OTAS: beta, 0.654; 13.090-30.483; P< 0.01). Coping significantly enhanced nontechnical skills (beta, 0.302; 0.117-1.624, P= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' stress and coping influenced surgical performance during simulated operations. Hence, these are critical factors for the quality of health care.

Long-term cognitive decline and mortality after carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To date no studies have evaluated long term cognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We evaluated whether participants who had CEA were at increased risk of cognitive decline over participants who didn't undergo CEA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients in the study were participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a study of 5201 men and women over the age of 65 who were recruited from four communities (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Sacramento, California; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Hagerstown, Maryland) in 1988-89. The outcomes measured were 1) Decline in 3MSE and digit symbol substitution test (DSST) scores after CEA compared to before CEA. 2) All-cause mortality in CHS cohort among participants who did and did not have CEA. RESULTS: CEA patients had significantly greater annual decrease in the DSST scores -2.43 (SD 4.21) compared to those who did not have a CEA -1.1 (SD 2.57) (p < 0.001) but this was not seen in the 3MSE scores. CEA patients had increased the risk of decline in DSST (OR 2.41, 95 % CI 1.49, 3.88) and 3MSE (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.35, 3.48) scores after adjusting for age, gender, race and educational status. CEA was associated with all-cause mortality in the long term with a HR of 2.72 (95 % CI 2.22, 3.34) after adjusting for covariates. Participants with lower baseline 3MSE scores HR 1.39 (1.27, 1.51), lower DSST scores <34 HR 1.69(1.54, 1.85) were more likely deceased. CONCLUSIONS: CEA patients are at increased risk of lower scores on 3MSE and DSST testing in the long term. Mortality in the CHS cohort was higher in participants who underwent CEA. Further, lower 3MSE and DSST scores increased the risk of mortality.

Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life for Mental Health Status in Patients After Carotid Endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with carotid stenosis and identify the predictive factors that affect the mental health status in patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting with carotid stenosis treated with CEA. Clinical data and demographics were collected for logistic regression analysis. The Short-Form General Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and minimum clinically important difference were used to evaluate the mental health status of patients after CEA. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and September 2017, a total of 224 patients were enrolled in this study. At baseline, mean SF-36 scores for physical component summary (PCS) (60.1 ± 26.3) and mental component summary (MCS) (59.9 ± 23.1) were significantly lower in patients with carotid disease than the urban population (P < 0.001). After CEA, the SF-36 scores for PCS (62.5 ± 21.7) and MCS (68.4 ± 18.7) were increased. However, only the improvement of MCS achieved minimum clinically important difference. After multiple logistic regression analysis, contralateral stenosis ≥50% (odds ratio [OR] 0.266, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.141-0.517) and hoarseness (OR 0.160, 95% CI 0.040-0.644) had negative effects on MCS. Dizziness improvement had positive effects on MCS (OR 2.882, 95% CI 1.569-5.298). CONCLUSIONS: Contralateral stenosis, dizziness improvement, and hoarseness may be the predictive factors that affect the mental health status in patients after CEA.

Predictors of cognitive functioning after carotid revascularization.

PURPOSE: High-grade carotid stenosis can affect cognition, but the relationship between stenosis correction and cognitive outcome is not fully understood, yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of post-operative neurocognitive functioning in patients with symptomatic severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with history of transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months and ipsilateral high-grade stenosis of ICA undergoing CEA were prospectively enrolled. Cerebral hemodynamics was assessed by means of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) to hypercapnia measured through transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Coloured Progressive Matrices plus Complex Figure Copy Test, and phonemic plus categorical (ca) Verbal Fluency tests were performed to assess right and left hemisphere cognitive functions, respectively. Cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive functions were assessed before and 6 months after CEA. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-one patients were included. The mean age was 73.2 (6.9) years and 121 (66.9%) were males. At 6 months from CEA, the scores obtained in the cognitive tests exploring the re-vascularized hemisphere's functions and ipsilateral cerebral hemodynamics were improved. At multivariate linear regression analysis, the 6-month change in cognitive performance was inversely associated with age [ß = -0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.22 to -0.12; p < .001] and CVR value obtained before CEA on the side of ICA stenosis (ß = -6.25, 95% CI -7.40 to -5.10; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic high-grade ICA stenosis, age and cerebral hemodynamic status before CEA predicted the neurocognitive performance changes after surgical stenosis correction.

Quality of life after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most studies documenting beneficial outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CE) are limited to mortality and morbidity rates, costs, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Few have examined the dependency of patients and how they perceive their own health changes after surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate quality of life and independence in activities of daily living (ADL) and to study its determinants. METHODS: Sixty-three patients admitted in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) after CE were eligible for this 14-month follow-up study. Patients were contacted 6 months after discharge to complete a Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36) and to have their dependency in ADL evaluated. RESULTS: Among 59 hospital survivors at 6 months follow-up, 43 completed the questionnaires. Sixty-three percent reported that their general level of health was better on the day they answered the questionnaire than 12 months earlier. Patients had worse SF-36 scores for all domains except bodily pain than a general urban population, and comparison with a group of patients 6 months after surgical ICU discharge showed no differences. Six months after PACU discharge, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of ADL Scale and the Katz Index of ADL demonstrated higher dependency scores (5.9 +/- 2.2 versus 4.3 +/- 2.4 and 0.3 +/- 0.8 versus 0.6 +/- 0.9, p < 0.001 and p = 0.047). Sixty-five percent and 33% were dependent in at least one activity in instrumental and personal ADL, respectively. Patients dependent in at least one ADL task had higher Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) scores (1.0 versus 1.5, p = 0.017). After controlling for multiple comparisons, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing CE have improved self-perception of quality of life despite being more dependent. Almost all their scores are worse than those in an urban population. We could identify no predictors of greater dependency in ADL tasks six months after PACU discharge.

Psychological impact of carotid endarterectomy: a review of the studies.

Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical treatment validated to prevent cerebral ischemia, embolism and stroke in patients affected by severe stenosis of the carotid artery. A 1999 systematic review of the literature found controversial results about CEA influence on improvement of post-surgical cognitive performance. Moreover, few studies addressed the issue of the positive effects of CEA on quality of life and depression, reporting also controversial findings. The present review was aimed at considering the last 20 years studies focusing on the effects of CEA on the psychological dimensions. The purpose was to clarify the benefits, in terms of psychological well-being, offered by CEA, besides a reduction of the cardiovascular risk, as well as to have indication to lead further research in this area. Results of the 39 studies considered suggest that, although few studies show cognitive deterioration, most of them show stability with a tendency to improve both in cognitive functions and in other psychological areas. Further research is needed to clarify when it would be appropriate the use of CEA, the characteristics of eligible patients, and psychological as well as physical expected outcomes.

Assessing surgeons' disclosure of risk information before carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: To make an informed decision about treatment, patients need accurate information about the benefits and risks of treatment and 'non-treatment' options. A survey was conducted to determine patients' recall of the extent and effect of preoperative disclosure by surgeons to patients of risks about carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 133 patients undergoing elective CEA in New South Wales. The primary outcome measures were patient recall of preoperative discussion, self-assessed estimates of stroke risk with and without surgery and receipt of written information before CEA. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients recalled that their surgeon discussed the short-term stroke risk (i.e. within 30 days) if they decided to undergo CEA (86.2%) than if they decided not to have the procedure (76.9%) (P = 0.04). Of those patients who recalled the surgeon discussing their short-term stroke risk with CEA, only 24 (18.0%) were accurately able to quantify this risk. Patients were significantly more likely to recall their surgeon discussing their long-term stroke risk (i.e. within 2 years) if they decided not to have CEA (72.4%) than if they decided to have the CEA (31.5%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients recalled discussions with their surgeon about short-term stroke risk. Only a minority, however, accurately quantified their postoperative stroke risk. In view of variable patient recall, decision aids could assist.

The role of pre-operative state-anxiety in the determination of intra-operative neuroendocrine responses and recovery.

OBJECTIVES: The psychophysiological model of adjustment to surgery predicts associations between (1) heightened pre-operative state-anxiety and intra-operative neuroendocrine responses, (2) neuroendocrine responses and complications; and (3) heightened pre-operative state-anxiety and post-operative recovery. The present study examined these associations. METHODS: Participants were 39 patients (mean age 71.9+/-6.1 years) undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy surgery under local anaesthesia. In the week prior to surgery, patients completed baseline measures of physical and mental functioning using the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). In addition to this, they undertook a 24-hour urine save to measure cortisol and catecholamines. Measures of state-anxiety were completed on the evening prior to surgery. A second 24-hour urine save was started at the time of anaesthetic induction. Follow-up measures of physical and mental functioning were completed 1 month following surgery. All complications were recorded during hospitalization. RESULTS: There was a significant negative association between pre-operative state-anxiety and intra-operative cortisol (r=-.52, p

Deficits of hand coordination and laterality of carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECT: Neurocognitive performance is used to assess multiple cognitive domains, including motor coordination, before and after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Although gross motor strength is impaired with ischemia of large cortical areas or of the internal capsule, the authors hypothesize that patients undergoing CEA demonstrate significant motor deficits of hand coordination contralateral to the operative side, which is more clearly manifest in the nondominant hand than in the dominant hand with ischemia of smaller cortical areas. METHODS: The neurocognitive performance of 374 patients was evaluated with a battery of neuropsychometric tests. Both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients undergoing CEA were included. The authors evaluated the patients' dominant and nondominant hand performance on the Grooved Pegboard test, a test of hand coordination, to demonstrate their functional laterality. Neurocognitive dysfunction was evaluated as the difference in performance before and after CEA according to group-rate and event-rate analyses. The z scores were generated for all tests using a reference group of patients who were having simple spine surgery. Dominant and nondominant motor coordination functions were evaluated as raw scores and as calculated z scores. RESULTS: According to event-rate analysis, significantly more patients undergoing CEA of the opposite carotid artery demonstrated nondominant than dominant hand deficits of coordination (41.2% vs 26.4%, respectively, p = 0.02). Similarly, according to group-rate analysis, in patients undergoing CEA of the opposite carotid artery, raw difference scores from the Grooved Pegboard test reflected greater nondominant than dominant hand deficits of coordination (21.0 ± 54.4 vs 9.7 ± 37.0, respectively, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CEA of the opposite carotid artery are more likely to demonstrate nondominant than dominant hand deficits of coordination because of greater dexterity in the dominant hand before surgery.

Scaling the sickness impact profile using item response theory: an exploration of linearity, adaptive use, and patient driven item weights.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to enhance the clinical interpretation and practicality of the widely used comprehensive Sickness Impact Profile. METHOD: Item Response Theory (extension of the Rasch model) was used to calibrate the severity of the SIP items, to assess item bias and to construct equally severe short forms of the SIP that can be used interchangeably. The scores of 1507 subjects were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 127 SIP items, 82 items fitted the extended Rasch model, i.e., the observed proportions of sickness level groups endorsing the items corresponded to the proportions expected by the model. The item severity hierarchy allowed a more straightforward interpretation of the calibrated SIP-82 scores. Some items showed bias in age, gender, or diagnosis groups. The equivalent short forms agreed sufficiently well with the calibrated SIP-82 item pool to be used interchangeably. We observed a moderate correlation between the original SIP item severity weights and the Rasch item severity calibrations (r=0.53). CONCLUSION: The interpretability and practicality of the SIP was enhanced by the IRT calibration. Using the item calibrations, short forms can be assembled that can be used interchangeably.

Do neck incisions influence nerve deficits after carotid endarterectomy?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether transverse neck incisions for carotid endarterectomy were associated with a similar or greater incidence of cranial nerve complications when compared with vertical skin incisions, and to assess the patient's perception of the appearance of the incision. DESIGN: Prospective, but not randomized. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Eighty-five consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures were evaluated prospectively in 80 patients. Although patients were not randomly assigned, consideration was given to having approximately the same number of patients who had carotid endarterectomy performed through transverse neck incision as through vertical neck incision. Forty-four carotid endarterectomies were performed with a vertical incision and 41 procedures were performed with a transverse incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: To determine the incidence of cranial nerve dysfunction (primarily nerves VII and XII) after operation. RESULTS: The incidence of palsies of cranial nerves VII and XII in the two groups was similar; there was no statistical significance (the seventh nerve palsy, 32% transverse vs 25% vertical; the 12th nerve palsy, 15% transverse vs 20% vertical). Seventy-two percent of the deficits had disappeared by the 3- to 6-month follow-up. Patients expressed a clear preference for the transverse incision (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical exposure was simpler with the vertical incision, adequate exposure with the transverse incision was always possible. The incidence of mostly temporary deficits of cranial nerves VII and XII was similar. Patients favored the transverse incision.

Patient satisfaction after carotid endarterectomy using a selective policy of local anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction after carotid endarterectomy has not been specifically studied or reported. Results of carotid endarterectomy using either local or general anesthesia have been widely reported, and outcomes are not significantly different for either technique. Patient satisfaction data were obtained in order to determine whether patients preferred one method of anesthesia over another. Data regarding outcome may be added to the surgical literature as benchmark data when comparing operative carotid endarterectomy to newer techniques. METHODS: During a 30-month period, 186 consecutive carotid endarterectomies were performed on 169 patients by a single surgeon with assistance from senior surgical residents. All patients were offered local anesthesia using a cervical block technique with intraoperative supplementation. Patients for whom local anesthesia was inappropriate or who declined were operated on using general endotracheal anesthesia. Results of operation were tabulated including indication for operation, method of anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and mortality, and completion of a patient satisfaction survey form either on postoperative visit or by telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 169 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, 151 (89%) completed the satisfaction survey form. One hundred fourteen (62%) had local anesthesia and 71 patients (38%) had general anesthesia. There was 1 stroke (0.5%) and 1 death (0.5%) in the series. Perioperative complications including temporary cranial nerve injury, neck hematoma, myocardial infarction, and restenosis were noted and not significantly different in either the general anesthesia or local anesthesia group. Patient satisfaction data including intraoperative discomfort, postoperative pain, attentiveness of the operating room staff, and length of stay were all tabulated. There was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction between the general anesthesia group and the local anesthesia group (chi-square and Fisher's exact test). Additionally, satisfaction with the procedure was extremely high. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcome and perception of pain and recovery were not statistically significantly different in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy using local anesthesia compared with general anesthesia. Overall patient satisfaction was extremely high. Patients should be offered carotid endarterectomy using an anesthesia technique with which the surgeon and patients are both comfortable, having confidence that the outcome is not related to anesthesia technique and that patients will be highly satisfied.