Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Technol Cult ; 65(1): 265-291, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661801

ABSTRACT

Did the 1980s automotive standards reflect the European Economic Community's move toward a "technical democracy" or a broader democratic deficit? In the early 1980s, Europe's automotive sector faced multiple challenges: the European Commission's desire to harmonize technical standards and achieve greater European integration, intense competition between manufacturers, and environmental issues like acid rain. Debates on reducing air pollution focused on unleaded petrol and catalytic converters. Two associations representing civil society in Brussels responded to the increase in environmental concerns with a 1982 joint campaign. Despite a rich historiography on pollutant emission standards, highlighting the strategies of governments and companies, no study has dealt with the role nongovernmental organizations played. Based on public and private archives, particularly those of the European Bureau of Consumers' Unions, this article argues the new regulations did not result from the EU's consultation with civil society organizations like consumer groups but rather with the automotive industry.


Subject(s)
Automobiles , Automobiles/history , Automobiles/standards , History, 20th Century , Europe , Democracy , European Union/history , Environmental Policy/history , Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Industry/history , Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Industry/standards
5.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 1074, 2013 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24225055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European Union (EU) health mandate was initially defined in the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. The twentieth anniversary of the Treaty offers a unique opportunity to take stock of EU health actions by giving an overview of influential public health related EU-level policy outputs and a summary of policy outputs or actions perceived as an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity. METHODS: Semi-structured expert interviews (N = 20) were conducted focusing on EU-level actions that were relevant for health. Respondents were asked to name EU policies or actions that they perceived as an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity. A directed content analysis approach was used to identify expert perceptions on achievements, failures and missed opportunities in the interviews. Additionally, a nominal group technique was applied to identify influential and public health relevant EU-level policy outputs. RESULTS: The ranking of influential policy outputs resulted in top positions of adjudications and legislations, agencies, European Commission (EC) programmes and strategies, official networks, cooperative structures and exchange efforts, the work on health determinants and uptake of scientific knowledge. The assessment of EU health policies as being an achievement, a failure or a missed opportunity was often characterized by diverging respondent views. Recurring topics that emerged were the Directorate General for Health and Consumers (DG SANCO), EU agencies, life style factors, internal market provisions as well as the EU Directive on patients' rights in cross-border healthcare. Among these recurring topics, expert perceptions on the establishment of DG SANCO, EU public health agencies, and successes in tobacco control were dominated by aspects of achievements. The implementation status of the Health in All Policy approach was perceived as a missed opportunity. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the emerging themes from the interviews conducted with the responsibilities defined in the EU health mandate, one can identify that these responsibilities were only partly fulfilled or acknowledged by the respondents. In general, the EU is a recognized public health player in Europe which over the past two decades, has begun to develop competencies in supporting, coordinating and supplementing member state health actions. However, the assurance of health protection in other European policies seems to require further development.


Subject(s)
European Union/organization & administration , Health Policy , Anniversaries and Special Events , European Union/history , Health Policy/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , International Cooperation/history , Interviews as Topic , Program Evaluation , Public Health/history , Public Health/methods
7.
J Law Soc ; 39(1): 131-49, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22530249

ABSTRACT

In 2007, the European Union adopted a lex specialis, Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), a new legal category of medical product in regenerative medicine. The regulation applies to ATMPs prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process. It also provides a hospital exemption, which means that medicinal products not regulated by EU law do not benefit from a harmonized regime across the European Union but have to respect national laws. This article describes the recent EU laws, and contrasts two national regimes, asking how France and the United Kingdom regulate ATMPs which do and do not fall under the scope of Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007. What are the different legal categories and their enforceable regimes, and how does the evolution of these highly complex regimes interact with the material world of regenerative medicine and the regulatory bodies and socioeconomic actors participating in it?


Subject(s)
European Union , Government Regulation , Jurisprudence , Regenerative Medicine , European Union/economics , European Union/history , France/ethnology , Government Regulation/history , History, 21st Century , Jurisprudence/history , Prescriptions/economics , Prescriptions/history , Regenerative Medicine/economics , Regenerative Medicine/education , Regenerative Medicine/history , Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom/ethnology
9.
J Peasant Stud ; 37(4): 661-98, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21125723

ABSTRACT

The biofuel project is an agro-industrial development and politically contested policy process where governments increasingly become global actors. European Union (EU) biofuels policy rests upon arguments about societal benefits of three main kinds - namely, environmental protection (especially greenhouse gas savings), energy security and rural development, especially in the global South. Each argument involves optimistic assumptions about what the putative benefits mean and how they can be fulfilled. After examining those assumptions, we compare them with experiences in three countries - Germany, Brazil and Mozambique - which have various links to each other and to the EU through biofuels. In those case studies, there are fundamental contradictions between EU policy assumptions and practices in the real world, involving frictional encounters among biofuel promoters as well as with people adversely affected. Such contradictions may intensify with the future rise of biofuels and so warrant systematic attention.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Biofuels , Ethanol , Food Supply , Public Policy , Rural Health , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/education , Agriculture/history , Agriculture/legislation & jurisprudence , Biofuels/economics , Biofuels/history , Brazil/ethnology , Developing Countries/economics , Developing Countries/history , Ethanol/economics , Ethanol/history , European Union/economics , European Union/history , Food Supply/economics , Food Supply/history , Food Supply/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany/ethnology , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Mozambique/ethnology , Public Health/economics , Public Health/education , Public Health/history , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Policy/economics , Public Policy/history , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Rural Health/history , Rural Population/history
11.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19137213

ABSTRACT

The development of the European legislation on chemicals must be viewed against the background of general developments in politics and society. Chemical accidents have played a triggering role, especially the catastrophe at Seveso in 1976. As a response, the "Seveso Directives" 82/501/EEC, 96/82/EEC, and 2003/105/EEC were passed. This also promoted general intentions to better comply with chemical hazards. The very first initiative of European institutions considering chemical compounds dates back to 1967 with Directive 67/548/EEC. Its amendments were later developed into the core of European legislation on chemicals. Other important fields of European legislation concerning chemicals, which were developed further, are environmental protection, consumer protection and occupational safety.


Subject(s)
Chemical Industry/history , Chemical Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Consumer Product Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union/history , Hazardous Substances/history , Toxicology/history , Toxicology/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Legislation, Drug/history
12.
J R Soc Interface ; 14(128)2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28298610

ABSTRACT

The extent to which international high-skilled mobility channels are forming is a question of great importance in an increasingly global knowledge-based economy. One factor facilitating the growth of high-skilled labour markets is the standardization of certifiable degrees meriting international recognition. Within this context, we analysed an extensive high-skilled mobility database comprising roughly 382 000 individuals from five broad profession groups (Medical, Education, Technical, Science & Engineering and Business & Legal) over the period 1997-2014, using the 13-country expansion of the European Union (EU) to provide insight into labour market integration. We compare the periods before and after the 2004 enlargement, showing the emergence of a new east-west migration channel between the 13 mostly eastern EU entrants (E) and the rest of the western European countries (W). Indeed, we observe a net directional loss of human capital from E → W, representing 29% of the total mobility after 2004. Nevertheless, the counter-migration from W → E is 7% of the total mobility over the same period, signalling the emergence of brain circulation within the EU. Our analysis of the country-country mobility networks and the country-profession bipartite networks provides timely quantitative evidence for the convergent integration of the EU, and highlights the central role of the UK and Germany as high-skilled labour hubs. We conclude with two data-driven models to explore the structural dynamics of the mobility networks. First, we develop a reconfiguration model to explore the potential ramifications of Brexit and the degree to which redirection of high-skilled labourers away from the UK may impact the integration of the rest of the European mobility network. Second, we use a panel regression model to explain empirical high-skilled mobility rates in terms of various economic 'push-pull' factors, the results of which show that government expenditure on education, per capita wealth, geographical proximity and labour force size are significant attractive features of destination countries.


Subject(s)
Career Mobility , Databases, Factual , European Union/economics , Human Migration , Models, Economic , European Union/history , Female , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male
13.
PLoS One ; 12(11): e0186452, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been a key agent of change in the 21st century. Given the role of ICT in changing society this research sought to explore the responses and attitudes to change from ICT professionals and ICT academics in dealing with the potentially far reaching political challenge triggered by the UK's 2016 European Union Referendum and its decision to leave the European Union (referred to as Brexit). Whilst the vote was a UK based decision its ramifications have global implications and as such the research was not confined to the UK. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data was collected through a survey launched on the first working day after the Brexit referendum vote to leave the EU and kept open for four weeks. The survey contained qualitative and quantitative questions. It sought to understand the opportunities and threats that would exist post-Brexit for ICT professionals and academics triggered by the decision. The research captured a complex rich picture on ICT professionals' responses to the potential challenge of change triggered by the Brexit vote. Immediately after the Brexit decision the research reveals uncertainties amongst ICT professionals regarding what the decision would mean, with just under half of the participants not identifying any opportunities or threats. For those who did, threats outweighed opportunities by just more than double. Whilst understanding the global possibilities and dangers, participants saw their position from national and organizational perspectives. The highest frequency coded threats related to areas outside the participants' control and the highest frequency opportunities related to areas where there was the potential for ICT interventions. This survey is part of longitudinal piece of research. Using the same methodological approach two further surveys are planned. The second survey will be one year after Article 50 was triggered on 29 March 2017. The final survey will be one year after the UK exit from the EU, assuming this occurs.


Subject(s)
European Union/history , Information Technology/trends , Politics , History, 21st Century , Humans , Information Technology/history , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
14.
Health Policy ; 121(6): 594-603, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28446384

ABSTRACT

Capacity assessment has become a popular measure in the health sector to assess the ability of various stakeholders to pursue agreed activities. The European Commission (EC) is increasingly dealing with a variety of health issues to coordinate and complement national health policies. This study analyses the functional capacity of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumers (DG SANCO) between 1999 and 2004. It applies the UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework and uses a literature review, a document review of EU policy documents and expert interviews to assess the capacity of DG SANCO to fulfill its mandate for public health and health systems. Our results suggest that DG SANCO has established capacities to engage with stakeholders; to assess various health issues, to define issue-specific health policies and to collect information for evaluative purposes. In contrast, capacities tend to be less established for defining a clear strategy for the overall sector, for setting priorities and for budgeting, managing and implementing policies. We conclude that improvements to the effectiveness of DG SANTE's (the successor of DG SANCO) policies can be made within the existing mandate. A priority setting exercise may be conducted to limit the number of pursued actions to those with the greatest European added value within DG SANTE's responsibilities.


Subject(s)
European Union/organization & administration , Health Policy , European Union/history , Health Information Management , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Program Evaluation , Public Health/history , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health Administration
19.
Ind Health ; 50(1): 7-11, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22327067

ABSTRACT

Europe has always played a key role in the field of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) and can be considered the cradle of Occupational Health. The European policy framework has been set since the establishment of the European Union, but its strength lies in the enactment of the Framework Directive on Occupational Health and Safety (89/391/EC), which has had a strong positive impact on the assessment and management of occupational risk factors and has promoted the quick diffusion of common standards across Europe. Yet, some implementation issues still remain to be addressed, due to changes in the world of work, fragmentation, economic crisis and, more generally, to the impact of globalization. Therefore, actions need to be reviewed with respect to research plans and policy implementation so as to support the OHS social dimension fostering a broader concept of wellbeing at work.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health , Europe , European Union/history , European Union/organization & administration , Forecasting , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Occupational Health/history , Occupational Health/trends , Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL