l-DOPA receptor GPR143 inhibits neurite outgrowth via L-type calcium channels in PC12 cells.

The gene product of ocular albinism 1 (OA1)/G-protein-coupled receptor (GPR)143 is a receptor for L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylanine (l-DOPA), the most effective agent for Parkinson's disease. When overexpressed, human wild-type GPR143, but not its mutants, inhibits neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. We investigated the downstream signaling pathway for GPR143-induced inhibition of neurite outgrowth. Nifedipine restored GPR143-induced neurite outgrowth inhibition to the level of control transfectant but did not affect outgrowth in GPR143-knockdown cells. Cilnidipine and flunarizine also suppressed the GPR143-induced inhibition, but their effects at higher concentrations still occurred even in GPR143-knockdown cells. These results suggest that GPR143 regulates neurite outgrowth via L-type calcium channel(s).

Abnormal heart rate variability and its application in predicting treatment efficacy in patients with chronic migraine: An exploratory study.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the extent of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in patients with chronic migraine using heart rate variability analysis. In addition, we explored the potential association between heart rate variability and treatment outcomes in patients receiving preventive treatment. METHODS: In this cross-sectional and prospective study, we compared heart rate variability profiles in 81 preventive-naïve chronic migraine patients and 58 healthy controls. In addition, treatment responses of patients, who received a 12-week treatment with flunarizine, were assessed in relation to baseline heart rate variability. RESULTS: We observed that chronic migraine patients had a reduced heart rate variability, signifying autonomic dysfunction in comparison to healthy controls. Furthermore, patients presenting normal heart rate variability, characterized by a standard deviation exceeding 30 milliseconds in normal-to-normal RR intervals, experienced a superior response to flunarizine treatment. This improvement was exemplified by a significantly larger reduction in monthly headache days for patients with higher heart rate variability compared to those with lower heart rate variability: -9.7 (5.9) vs. -6.2 (6.0) days (p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic dysfunction occurs in chronic migraine as evaluated by heart rate variability. A preserved function is associated with a better treatment outcome to flunarizine.Trial registration: Neurologic Signatures of Chronic Pain Disorders, NCT02747940. Registered 22 April 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02747940.

Interventional Study of Flunarizine Therapy on Symptom Relief and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Changes in Individuals with Vestibular Migraine.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is the third most common disease in the world with an estimated prevalence of 14.7%. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristic changes in cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) and analyse changes in symptoms and VEMP after flunarizine therapy in patients diagnosed with vestibular migraine (VM). METHODS: Prospective interventional study was conducted on 31 VM patients. Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) were recorded. Flunarizine (10 mg) was given once daily for two consecutive months. Prophylactic therapy was monitored with a monthly follow-up assessment of their symptoms and VEMP was repeated after 2 months. RESULTS: Headache was the chief complaint (67.7%). Vertigo was spontaneous and mostly moderate in intensity (93%). cVEMP was absent in 1 patient and oVEMP was absent in 3 patients. Post prophylactic treatment with flunarizine, there was significant reduction in the frequency (p = 0.001) and duration (p = 0.001) of headache and frequency (p = 0.001), duration (p = 0.001), and intensity (p = 0.009) of vertigo. cVEMP and oVEMP showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between pre- and post-treatment recordings. CONCLUSION: Treatment with flunarizine helps in considerably reducing the episodes and duration of headache, as well as episodes, duration, and intensity of vertigo.

The effect of topiramate versus flunarizine on the non-headache symptoms of migraine.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of topiramate versus flunarizine on the non-headache symptoms (NHS) of migraine, and to observe the changes of dopamine (DA) and prolactin (PRL) before and after prophylactic treatment. METHODS: Sixty-six episodic migraine patients were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either flunarizine or topiramate treatment. Clinical characteristics and NHS associated with migraine were investigated before and after prophylactic treatment. The DA and PRL levels were also determined before and after prophylactic treatment. RESULTS: The NHS of migraine in the two groups were significantly better after treatment than before treatment in premonitory phase (PP), headache phase (HP), and resolution phase (RP). The NHS in the two groups had no significant difference in PP, HP, and RP before and after treatment. In the flunarizine group, the PRL content after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment (t = -4.097, p < 0.001), but the DA content was decreased slightly compared with that before treatment (t = 1.909, p = 0.066). There was no significant difference in PRL content (t = 1.099, p = 0.280) and DA content (t = 1.556, p = 0.130) in topiramate group before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The two classical prophylactic drugs of migraine were significantly effective in treating the NHS of migraine, but there was no significant difference between the two drugs. The DA-PRL axis may be involved in the underlying mechanism of the flunarizine treatment for the NHS of migraine.

Ratanasampil is more effective than flunarizine in relieving migraine.

Aims: Migraine is a common neurological disorder with high incidence in population. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of Tibetan medicine Ratanasampil (RNSP) and to identify the serum biomarkers for diagnosis and response assessment.Materials and methods: We prospectively recruited 108 migraine patients living at high altitude (2,260 m), including 40 patients for RNSP group, 40 patients for flunarizine (FLZ) group, and 28 patients for placebo group. Serum levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), nerve growth factor (NGF) and ß-endorphin (ß-EP) before and after therapy were measured.Results: In comparison with placebo, both FLZ and RNSP significantly reduced the migraine days, HIT-6 score and verbal rating scale, headache intensity, duration, accompanying symptoms and headache score in four and eight weeks treatment. RNSP showed no significant difference to FLZ in the above parameters after four weeks treatment, but showed significantly better relief after eight weeks treatment. The overall effective rate of RNSP (92.5%) was also significantly higher than FLZ (74.4%, p < 0.05), mainly due to significantly higher ratio of patients with full recovery. The serum levels of biomarkers, including 5-HT, BDNF, NGF and ß-EP, significantly elevated after eight weeks of treatment with RNSP, whereas the level of CGRP significantly decreased. The serum level of 5-HT exhibited significantly bigger percentage changes than other markers.Conclusion: In conclusion, RNSP was more effective than FLZ in relieving migraine after eight weeks continuous treatment. Serum 5-HT, BDNF, CGRP, NGF and ß-EP were effective markers reflecting the response to RNSP and FLZ therapy.

European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention-part 2: flunarizine.

OBJECTIVE: Novel disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments sharing good evidence of efficacy for migraine have been recently marketed. However, reimbursement by insurers depends on treatment failure with classic anti-migraine drugs. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify and rate the evidence for efficacy of flunarizine, a repurposed, first- or second-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Eligible trials for meta-analysis were randomized, placebo-controlled studies comparing flunarizine with placebo. Outcomes of interest according to the Outcome Set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) were the proportion of patients reaching a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs), and Adverse Events (AEs) leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: Five trials were eligible for narrative description and three for data synthesis and analysis. No studies reported the predefined outcomes, but one study assessed the 50% reduction in monthly migraine attacks with flunarizine as compared to placebo showing a benefit from flunarizine with a low or probably low risk of bias. We found that flunarizine may increase the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo (risk difference: 0.02; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Published flunarizine trials predate the recommended endpoints for evaluating migraine prophylaxis drugs, hence the lack of an adequate assessment for these endpoints. Further, modern-day, large-scale studies would be valuable in re-evaluating the efficacy of flunarizine for the treatment of migraines, offering additional insights into its potential benefits.

Pain sensitivities predict prophylactic treatment outcomes of flunarizine in chronic migraine patients: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the differences in quantitative sensory testing between chronic migraine and healthy controls and to explore the association between pain sensitivities and outcomes in chronic migraine following preventive treatment. METHODS: In this prospective open-label study, preventive-naïve chronic migraine and healthy controls were recruited, and cold, heat, mechanical punctate, and pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of first branch of trigeminal nerve and first thoracic nerve were measured by quantitative sensory testing at baseline. Chronic migraines were treated with flunarizine and treatment response was defined as ≥50% reduction in the number of monthly headache days over the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Eighty-four chronic migraines and fifty age-and-sex-matched healthy controls were included in the analysis. The chronic migraine had higher cold pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of trigeminal nerve and the first thoracic nerve (p < 0.001 and < 0.001), lower pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first thoracic nerve (p = 0.003), heat pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve and the first thoracic nerve (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015) than healthy controls. After treatment, 24/84 chronic migraine had treatment response. The responders with relatively normal pain sensitivity had higher heat pain thresholds over the dermatome of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.002), mechanical punctate pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.023), and pressure pain thresholds over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (p = 0.026) than the hypersensitive non-responders. Decision tree analysis showed that patients with mechanical punctate pain threshold over the dermatomes of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve > 158 g (p = 0.020) or heat pain threshold over the dermatome of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve > 44.9°C (p = 0.002) were more likely to be responders. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic migraine were generally more sensitive compared to healthy controls. Preventive treatment with flunarizine should be recommended particularly for chronic migraine who have relatively normal sensitivity to mechanical punctate or heat pain.Trial registration: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747940).

2022 Taiwan Guidelines for Preventive Treatment of Migraine.

The Treatment Guideline Subcommittee of the Taiwan Headache Society evaluated the medications currently used for migraine prevention in Taiwan. The subcommittee assessed the results of recently published trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines. After expert panel discussions, the subcommittee reached a consensus on the preventive treatment of migraine in Taiwan, which includes recommendation levels, the strength of evidence, and essential prescription information (i.e., dosage and adverse effects) . The recent introduction of CGRP monoclonal antibodies has had a substantial effect on migraine treatment. Thus, the subcommittee updated the previous version of the treatment guideline published in 2017. Preventive medications for migraines can be divided into the following categories: ß-blockers, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, onabotulinumtoxinA, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and complementary and alternative medicine. For episodic migraine prevention, propranolol, flunarizine, and topiramate are recommended as the first-line medications. Second-line medications for episodic migraine prevention include valproic acid, amitriptyline, and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Other treatment options could be used as third-line treatments. For chronic migraine prevention, topiramate, flunarizine, onabotulinumtoxinA, and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are recommended as first-line therapies. Preventive medications for episodic migraine can also be used as second-line treatments for chronic migraine. For menstrual migraines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and triptans can be used for short-term prophylaxis. Indications for starting preventive treatment include a headache frequency of ≥4 days per month, profound disabilities, failure of or contraindication to acute therapies, a complicated migraine with debilitating (e.g., hemiplegic) auras, and migrainous brain infarction. The general principle for oral preventives is to "start low and go slow" while monitoring for adverse events and comorbid conditions. Physicians could consider gradually tapering the medications in patients with sustained improvement over 3 to 6 months in episodic migraine and 6 to 12 months in chronic migraine. Education about not overusing acute medications is also essential for all patients with migraine. Key words: migraine, preventive treatment, evidence-based medicine, guidelines, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, onabotulinumtoxinA, neuromodulation.

Flunarizine inhibits osteoclastogenesis by regulating calcium signaling and promotes osteogenesis.

Many bone diseases such as osteoporosis and periodontitis are caused by hyperactivation of osteoclasts. Calcium (Ca2+ ) signals are crucial for osteoclast differentiation and function. Thus, the blockade of Ca2+ signaling may be a strategy for regulating osteoclast activity and has clinical implications. Flunarizine (FN) is a Ca2+ channel antagonist that has been used for reducing migraines. However, the role of FN in osteoclast differentiation and function remains unknown. Here, we investigated whether FN regulates osteoclastogenesis and elucidated the molecular mechanism. FN inhibited osteoclast differentiation along with decreased expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1), and attenuated osteoclast maturation and bone resorption. FN inhibition of osteoclast differentiation was restored by ectopic expression of constitutively active NFATc1. FN reduced calcium oscillations and its inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and resorption function was reversed by ionomycin, an ionophore that binds Ca2+ . FN also inhibited Ca2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) and calcineurin leading to a decrease in the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein-dependent cFos and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1ß expression, and NFATc1 nuclear translocation. These results indicate that FN inhibits osteoclastogenesis via regulating CaMKIV and calcineurin as a Ca2+ channel blocker. In addition, FN-induced apoptosis in osteoclasts and promoted osteogenesis. Furthermore, FN protected lipopolysaccharide- and ovariectomy-induced bone destruction in mouse models, suggesting that it has therapeutic potential for treating inflammatory bone diseases and postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Comparison of Therapeutic Results with/without Additional Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the combination of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and pharmacological treatment in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and define patients amenable for HBO therapy. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, trial involving 136 cases with unilateral ISSNHL that were randomly divided into 2 groups: the pharmacological treatment (P) group and HBO + pharmacological treatment (HBO+P) group, which received additional HBO for 14 days besides the pharmacological treatments. Pure tone audiometry gain larger than 15 dBHL was defined as success, and the success rate of each group was calculated. RESULTS: The overall success rate of the HBO+P group and the P group is 60.6% (40/66) and 42.9% (30/70), respectively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with mild-moderate baseline hearing loss, aged ≤50 years, receiving treatment in ≤14 days, or without accompanied dizziness/vertigo in the HBO+P group had higher success rate than the P group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HBO combined with pharmacological treatments leads to better hearing recovery than pharmacological treatments alone.

Novel pharmacological modulation of dystonic phenotypes caused by a gain-of-function mutation in the Na+ leak-current channel.

The Na leak-current channel (NALCN) regulates the resting membrane potential in excitable cells, thus determining the likelihood of depolarization in response to incoming signals. Gain-of-function (gf) mutations in this channel are associated with severe dystonic movement disorders in man. Currently, there are no known pharmacological antagonists or selective modulators of this important channel. A gain-of-function mutation in NALCN of C. elegans [known as unc-77(e625)] causes uncoordinated, hyperactive locomotion. We hypothesized that this hyperactive phenotype can be rescued with pharmacological modulators. Here, we summarize the results of targeted drug screening aimed at identification of drugs that corrected locomotion deficits in unc-77(e625) animals. To assay hyperactive locomotion, animals were acutely removed from food and characteristic foraging movements were quantified. Drug screening revealed that 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-ABP), nifedipine, nimodipine, flunarizine and ethoxzolamide significantly decreased abnormal movements in unc-77(e625) animals. 2-APB also corrected egg release and coiling deficits in this strain. In addition, serotonin and dopamine both reduced hyperactive locomotion, consistent with regulatory interactions between these systems and the NALCN. 2-APB induced movement phenotypes in wild-type animals that faithfully mimicked those observed in NALCN knockout strains, which suggested that this drug may directly block the channel. Moreover, 2-APB and flunarizine showed significant structural similarities suggestive of overlap in their mode of action. Together, these studies have revealed new insights into regulation of NALCN function and led to the discovery of a potential pharmacological antagonist of the NALCN.

Tuling Wendan Decoction combined with flunarizine in the treatment of migraine patients and the effect of intervention on serum cyclooxygenase-2, endothelin-1 and nitric oxide.

This experiment aimed to explore the curative effect of Tuling Wendan Decoction combined with flunarizine on migraine patients and the intervention effect on serum cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide(NO) levels. For this purpose, from January 2019 to January 2020, 96 patients with migraine in our hospital were selected as the research object. Using a simple randomization method, patients who meet the criteria were assigned 1:1, and each patient was assigned a random number, of which the number 1 to 48 were the observation group, and the number 49 to 96 were the control group. The control group was treated with flunarizine, and the observation group was treated with Tuling Wendan Decoction combined with flunarizine. Comparing the efficacy, incidence of adverse reactions, the incidence of headache, cerebral blood flow rate [basal artery (BA), vertebral artery (VA), middle cerebral artery (MCA)], vascular endothelial function (serum COX-2, ET-1, NO levels), neurological function [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)] before treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment between the two groups. The results for efficacy showed that after 8 weeks of treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group (93.75%) was higher than that of the control group (77.08%, P<0.05). In regards to the situation of headache attack, the number of headache attacks, duration, pain degree and accompanying symptom scores of the observation group after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Results of cerebral blood flow velocity showed that the blood flow velocity of BA, VA, MCA in the observation group was lower than that in the control group after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment (P<0.05). Vascular endothelial function results indicated that the serum COX-2 and ET-1 levels of the observation group were lower than those of the control group after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment, and the serum NO levels were higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The serum BDNF and CGRP levels of the observation group were lower than those of the control group after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment, and the serum 5-HT levels were higher than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). It was concluded that Tuling Wendan Decoction combined with flunarizine is the first treatment for migraine, with definite curative effect and can effectively improve the onset of headache, reduce the speed of cerebral blood flow, regulate vascular endothelial function and nerve function, and ensure safety.

Mibefradil and Flunarizine, Two T-Type Calcium Channel Inhibitors, Protect Mice against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury.

Recent studies have illuminated that blocking Ca2+ influx into effector cells is an attractive therapeutic strategy for lung injury. We hypothesize that T-type calcium channel may be a potential therapeutic target for acute lung injury (ALI). In this study, the pharmacological activity of mibefradil (a classical T-type calcium channel inhibitor) was assessed in a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced ALI. In LPS challenged mice, mibefradil (20 and 40 mg/kg) dramatically decreased the total cell number, as well as the productions of TNF-α and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Mibefradil also suppressed total protein concentration in BALF, attenuated Evans blue extravasation, MPO activity, and NF-κB activation in lung tissue. Furthermore, flunarizine, a widely prescripted antimigraine agent with potent inhibition on T-type channel, was also found to protect mice against lung injury. These data demonstrated that T-type calcium channel inhibitors may be beneficial for treating acute lung injury. The important role of T-type calcium channel in the acute lung injury is encouraged to be further investigated.

Analysis of the effectiveness of the prophylaxis of vestibular migraine depending on the diagnostic category and the prescribed drug.

INTRODUCTION: Vestibular migraine (VM) consists of recurrent episodes of vestibular symptoms that are accompanied by migraine in at least 50% of the episodes. The criteria of the Bárány Society include two diagnostic categories: "actual" vestibular migraine and probable vestibular migraine. There is a wide range of drugs that can be prescribed for the prophylactic treatment of VM, but recommendations for the selection of the most appropriate drug are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To measure the extent to which the prophylactic treatment of VM reduces vestibular symptoms, headache and the number of crises depending on the diagnostic category of the Bárány Society and the drug used for prophylaxis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter prospective study. Patients with VM who presented to any of the participating centers and who subsequently met the VM criteria were prescribed one of the following types of prophylaxis: acetazolamide, amitriptyline, flunarizine, propranolol or topiramate. Patients were called back for a follow-up visit 5 weeks later. This allowed the intensity of vestibular symptoms, headache and the number of crises before and during treatment to be compared. RESULTS: 31 Patients met the inclusion criteria. During the treatment, all the measured variables decreased significantly. In a visual analogue scale, the intensity of vestibular symptoms decreased by 45.8 points, the intensity of headache decreased by 47.8 points and patients suffered from 15.6 less monthly crises compared to the period before the treatment. No significant between-group differences were found when patients were divided based on their diagnostic category or the choice of prophylaxis prescribed to them. CONCLUSION: The treatment of VM produces a reduction of symptoms and crises with no significant differences based on patients' diagnostic categories or the choice of prophylaxis prescribed to them.

Quantification of Trigeminovascular Hypersensitivity Using Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis in a Patient With Chronic Migraine.

BACKGROUND: Activation of peripheral and/or central trigeminovascular pain pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine. Small fibers mediate pain, thermal sensation, and autonomic functions. Axon flare response is correlated with local C-fiber activation and calcitonin gene-related peptide release. Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) detects very subtle microcirculatory changes that are not visible to the naked eye. CASE: Axon flare response was elicited by 0.01 mL intradermal (i.d.) histamine introduced to the left forehead, trigeminal nerve ophthalmic branch (V1) skin area. Skin microvascular blood flow data were recorded using a LASCA real-time microcirculation imaging system. In the healthy control, prick stimulus slightly elevated focal skin microcirculation only at the stimulated focal area. However, in our patient with chronic migraine, the unilateral prick stimulation transiently (over 10 to 12 seconds) increased ipsilateral skin microcirculation at all 3 branches of the trigeminal nerve, with a slight expansion across the midline. Left V1 stimulation by i.d. histamine induced not only prominent but also long-lasting (10 to 15 minutes of recording time) axon flare response at the ipsilateral V1, V2, and V3 areas, with an expansion to the contralateral V1 area and without any report of allodynia or hyperalgesia. The treatment decreased axon flare characteristics probably by inhibiting neurogenic inflammation. DISCUSSION: The clinical characteristics and individual response to treatment vary widely across patients with pain. Here, we demonstrated the presence of transient spread of increased microcirculation at the ipsilateral trigeminal nerve, and also across the midline after prick stimulus, whereas a more prominent, widespread, and long-lasting histamine-induced axon flare response occurred in a rare subclass of patient who had chronic migraine with autonomic symptoms. The modulatory effect of the pharmacological intervention has also been objectively quantified by LASCA.

[Systematic review and Meta-analysis on randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety for acupuncture versus Flunarizine in treatment of migraine].

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture versus Flunarizine hydrochloride in the treatment of migraine. Four Chinese databases(CNKI, VIP, WanFang, CBM), three English databases(Cochrane Library, EMbase, Medline) and ClinicalTrail.gov were systematically and comprehensively retrieved. The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to January 8, 2020. Randomized controlled trial(RCT) for acupuncture versus Flunarizine in the treatment of migraine were screened out according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The included studies were evaluated with the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. The included studies was conducted by RevMan 5.3, and the outcome indicators were evaluated for evidence quality and strength of recommendation by the GRADE system. A total of 1 033 literatures were retrieved, and 23 studies were finally included. Except for 4 multiarm tests, the total sample size was 1 548, including 785 in acupuncture group and 763 in Flunarizine group. The overall quality of the included studies was not high. Meta-analysis results showed that the acupuncture group was superior to the Flunarizine group in reduction of headache frequency(SMD=-1.00, 95%CI[-1.45,-0.54], P<0.000 1). In reduction of headache intensity, acupuncture group was superior to Flunarizine group(SMD=-1.05, 95%CI[-1.41,-0.68], P<0.000 01). In reduction of headache duration, acupuncture group was superior to Flunarizine group(SMD=-1.42, 95%CI[-1.83,-1.02], P<0.000 1). The acupuncture group was superior to Flunarizine group(MD=-0.17, 95%CI[-0.21,-0.13], P<0.000 01) in reduction of the painkillers taking frequency. The acupuncture group was superior to Flunarizine group(SMD=-0.94, 95%CI[-1.35,-0.52], P<0.000 1) in allevia-tion of paroxysmal symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting. The GRADE system showed that the evidence level of the above indicators was extremely low, and the strength of recommendation was low. As for the occurrence of adverse reactions, the adverse reactions reported in the acupuncture group included in the study were all mild adverse reactions, like drowsiness, subcutaneous bleeding, local pain, subcutaneous hematoma and dizziness needle. The available evidence showed that acupuncture has a better efficacy than Flunarizine hydrochloride in the treatment of migraine in adult patients. However, due to the high bias risk in the included studies, the conclusions of this study shall be adopted with caution, and more high-quality studies shall be carried out for verification in the future.

A central hydrophobic E1 region controls the pH range of hepatitis C virus membrane fusion and susceptibility to fusion inhibitors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes chronic liver disease. Antivirals have been developed and cure infection. However, resistance can emerge and salvage therapies with alternative modes of action could be useful. Several licensed drugs have emerged as HCV entry inhibitors and are thus candidates for drug repurposing. We aimed to dissect their mode of action, identify improved derivatives and determine their viral targets. METHODS: HCV entry inhibition was tested for a panel of structurally related compounds, using chimeric viruses representing diverse genotypes, in addition to viruses containing previously determined resistance mutations. Chemical modeling and synthesis identified improved derivatives, while generation of susceptible and non-susceptible chimeric viruses pinpointed E1 determinants of compound sensitivity. RESULTS: Molecules of the diphenylpiperazine, diphenylpiperidine, phenothiazine, thioxanthene, and cycloheptenepiperidine chemotypes inhibit HCV infection by interfering with membrane fusion. These molecules and a novel p-methoxy-flunarizine derivative with improved efficacy preferentially inhibit genotype 2 viral strains. Viral residues within a central hydrophobic region of E1 (residues 290-312) control susceptibility. At the same time, viral features in this region also govern pH-dependence of viral membrane fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Small molecules from different chemotypes related to flunarizine preferentially inhibit HCV genotype 2 membrane fusion. A hydrophobic region proximal to the putative fusion loop controls sensitivity to these drugs and the pH range of membrane fusion. An algorithm considering viral features in this region predicts viral sensitivity to membrane fusion inhibitors. Resistance to flunarizine correlates with more relaxed pH requirements for fusion. LAY SUMMARY: This study describes diverse compounds that act as HCV membrane fusion inhibitors. It defines viral properties that determine sensitivity to these molecules and thus provides information to identify patients that may benefit from treatment with membrane fusion inhibitors.

Effect of flunarizine on defibrillation outcomes and early refibrillation in a canine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Can successful electrical shock in combination with a delayed after-depolarization (DAD) blocker suppress early refibrillation episodes following long duration ventricular fibrillation (LDVF)? What is the main finding and its importance? Flunarizine significantly reduced the activation of LDVF and early ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence following LDVF, suggesting that DADs potentially contribute to refibrillation in prolonged VF. Thus, DAD inhibition can be used as an adjunctive therapy for electrical defibrillation to treat prolonged VF and suppress refibrillation following LDVF. ABSTRACT: This study attempts to detect changes in the defibrillation threshold (DFT) at different stages of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (short duration VF, SDVF; long duration VF, LDVF) and during early refibrillation following successful defibrillation of LDVF by giving flunarizine, a blocker of delayed after-depolarizations (DADs). Twelve beagles were divided into two groups (the control group, n = 6; and the flunarizine group, n = 6). Two 64-electrode basket catheters were deployed into the left and the right ventricles for global endocardium mapping. The DFTs of SDVF and LDVF were determined at 20 s and 7 min, respectively, after VF induction in each group. Any refibrillation episodes were recorded within 15 min after the first successful defibrillation of LDVF. In the flunarizine group, the SDVF-DFT values before and after the drug were not significantly different. The 7 min LDVF-DFTs were markedly reduced by 26% (P < 0.05, the control group) and 38% (P < 0.01, the flunarizine group) compared to the 20 s SDVF-DFTs within each group. The difference between SDVF-DFT and LDVF-DFT after flunarizine was larger than that in the control group (213 ± 65 vs. 120 ± 84 V, P < 0.05). The number of refibrillation episodes per animal (1.3 ± 1.0) following successful defibrillation of LDVF after flunarizine was 48% of that in controls (2.7 ± 2.0, P < 0.05). The effect of flunarizine on SDVF-DFT and LDVF-DFT indicates that the role of DADs in the defibrillation mechanism may differ as VF continues. Flunarizine significantly reduced early VF recurrence following LDVF, suggesting that DADs potentially contribute to refibrillation in a canine model of prolonged VF.

Point of View: Electrophysiological Endpoints Differ When Comparing the Mode of Action of Highly Successful Anti-arrhythmic Drugs in the CAVB Dog Model With TdP.

In the anaesthetized, chronic atrioventricular block (CAVB) dog, ventricular ectopic beats and Torsade de pointes arrhythmias (TdP) are believed to ensue from an abrupt prolongation of ventricular repolarization and increased temporal dispersion of repolarization, quantified as short-term variability (STV). These TdP stop spontaneously or, when supported by substantial spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR), degenerate into ventricular fibrillation. However, most studies involving ventricular arrhythmias do not quantify SDR by means of an electrophysiological parameter. Therefore, we reviewed the effects of 4 highly effective anti-arrhythmic drugs (flunarizine, verapamil, SEA-0400, and GS-458967) on the repolarization duration and associated STV. All drugs were tested as anti-arrhythmic strategies against TdP in CAVB dogs, their high anti-arrhythmic efficacy was defined as suppressing drug-induced TdP in 100% of the experiments. This comparison demonstrates that even though the anti-arrhythmic outcome was similar for all drugs, distinct responses of repolarization duration and associated STV were observed. Moreover, the aforementioned and commonly adopted electrophysiological parameters were not always sufficient in predicting TdP susceptibility, and additional quantification of the SDR proved to be of added value in these studies. The variability in electrophysiological responses to the different anti-arrhythmic drugs and their inconsistent adequacy in reflecting TdP susceptibility, can be explained by distinct modes of interference with TdP development. As such, this overview establishes the separate involvement of temporal and spatial dispersion in ventricular arrhythmogenesis in the CAVB dog model and proposes SDR as an additional parameter to be included in future fundamental and/or pharmaceutical studies regarding TdP arrhythmogenesis.

Combination of flunarizine and transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation improves migraine prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to access the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of flunarizine plus transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation (tSNS) compared with either flunarizine or tSNS alone for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: Patients with episodic migraine were enrolled and randomized into 3 groups. Flunarizine 5 mg per day, or tSNS for 20 minutes daily or combination of both were prescribed consecutively for 3 months. The primary outcome measures were changes in migraine days and 50% responder rate of monthly migraine days. Secondary outcome measures were the changes in migraine intensity and intake of rescue medication. Finally, satisfaction to treatment and adverse effect were evaluated as well. RESULTS: A total of 154 were randomized and included in the analysis. After 3 months, the monthly migraine days were decreased in 3 groups and more significant in the combination group. The 50% responder rate was significantly higher (78.43%) in the combination therapy than monotherapy of flunarizine (46.15%) or tSNS (39.22%) alone. Greater reduction of migraine intensity and intake of rescue medication was observed in combination group. There was no difference of adverse events between flunarizine group and combination group (P = .89). CONCLUSION: Adding tSNS to flunarizine can improve the therapeutic efficacy of migraine prophylaxis without increasing the adverse effects. In addition, tSNS is effective and safe for migraine treatment and can be a valid option for migraineurs who are reluctant to take oral medications or for patients who experience a low-migraine frequency and/or intensity that prophylactic therapy is not indicated but desire to acquire medical intervention.