Pectoralis major muscle flap use in a modern head and neck free flap practice.

PURPOSE: Pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMMF) are a commonly used reconstructive modality to repair head and neck defects. As the use of free flap reconstruction is increasingly practiced in the head and neck, the role of the PMMF may be changing as well. This study sought to analyze indications and outcomes for PMMF following head and neck resections from one surgeon's experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review from December 1, 2013 through September 30, 2017 at a tertiary care academic medical center. Indications for the PMMF were examined as well as surgical outcomes. Basic demographic data, patient head and neck cancer history, history of radiation and/or chemotherapy, and history of previous reconstructive procedures were obtained and compared across all subjects. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent a PMMF within the designated time frame. The majority of patients were male (83%) and the average age was 65 years (range 55.4-74.6 years). Of the 40 cases, 9 of the PMMFs were performed as primary reconstruction of the defect. In the remaining 31 cases, these flaps were utilized as a secondary reconstructive option following fistula formation (13), dehiscence (6), need for an additional flap for recurrent disease (6) infection (4), or major bleeding (2). In every case that it was utilized, the PMMF was the definitive reconstruction. Within the same time frame, 429 free flaps were performed by the same surgeon, with an average of 125 free flaps performed yearly. The rate of total flap failure overall was 3.9%. The other failed free flap reconstructive options used besides a PMMF were secondary free flaps (11), local wound care (4), or obturator placement (2). The secondary pectoralis flaps occurred following 7.2% of free flaps with total or partial failure that were performed within the same time range. The indications for the PMMF did not change or evolve during the time frame of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although free flaps were performed with far greater frequency than PMMFs at our institution, the PMMF demonstrated continued utility as a secondary reconstructive option. For a surgeon who performs a high volume of free flaps, preservation of the pectoralis muscle and associated vasculature for possible later secondary reconstruction should be considered due to its strong efficacy.

Neovaginal Construction with Pelvic Peritoneum: Reviewing an Old Approach for a New Application.

Transgender reassignment surgeries have become a major topic of interest within the last decade. Although there are numerous surgical techniques for male-to-female reassignment, a physician must assess each patient's anatomy and past medical history to determine the most suitable technique. Additionally, patient preference is important. The neovaginal constructive technique most commonly used in male-to-female reassignment surgery is penile skin inversion, but various other techniques and tissues can also be used including pelvic peritoneum, buccal mucosa, and bowel. Surgical text descriptions were enhanced by creating new anatomical illustrations. Donor and recipient site anatomies, and the surgical technique leading to creation of the neovagina, are demonstrated in detail with relevant illustrations. A review of the literature concerning the anatomy, procedure development, and outcomes is presented. The pelvic peritoneum was originally used in neovaginal construction for females with vaginal agenesis as a result of MRKH syndrome. The use of this technique to create a neovagina in male-to-female transgender reassignment surgery has become appealing owing to the relative ease of the procedure, low complication rates, and overall high patient satisfaction. This technique offers a potential new choice for transgender male-to-female neovaginal construction, but further studies are needed to confirm its successful use in transgender surgery. Clin. Anat. 31:175-180, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Worldwide 10-Year Systematic Review of Treatment Trends in Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the trends pertaining to the use of the fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction during the past 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review for publications on the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction in the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed from January 1, 2005 until December 31, 2014. Publications were classified by topic, number of patients, and country of origin. The study period was split into 2 periods. The first 5-year period was compared with the second 5-year period. RESULTS: Eighty-five publications were identified. There was an increase in publications regarding restorative decision making (11 vs 9), surgical techniques (13 vs 6), outcomes (20 vs 10), and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM; 8 vs 2) in the second 5-year period. The number of patients reported also increased in publications on surgical techniques (1,085 vs 59), outcomes (777 vs 254), bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and osteoradionecrosis (165 vs 28), and CAD-CAM (65 vs 15) in the second 5-year period. The United States, India, China, and Europe produced most of the publications. CONCLUSIONS: In the past 10 years, there was a surge in publications on the use of the fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction. There was a 1.8-fold increase in the number of publications and a 3.4-fold increase in the number of patients undergoing this method of mandibular reconstruction in the second 5-year period. Publications from the United States, India, and China contributed to a large increase in the number of patients in the second 5-year period. More interest in CAD-CAM technology was seen in the second 5-year period that was not seen in the first 5-year period.

The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.

It is over 20 years since the inaugural deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. We review the type of flap utilized and indications in 2,850 microvascular breast reconstruction over the subsequent 20 years in the senior author's practice (Robert J. Allen). Data were extracted from a personal logbook of all microsurgical free flap breast reconstructions performed between August 1992 and August 2012. Indication for surgery; mastectomy pattern in primary reconstruction; flap type, whether unilateral or bilateral; recipient vessels; and adjunctive procedures were recorded. The DIEP was the most commonly performed flap (66%), followed by the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (12%), superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (9%), inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (6%), profunda artery perforator flap (3%), and transverse upper gracilis flap (3%). Primary reconstruction accounted for 1,430 flaps (50%), secondary 992 (35%), and tertiary 425 (15%). As simultaneous bilateral reconstructions, 59% flaps were performed. With each flap, there typically ensues a period of enthusiasm which translated into surge in flap numbers. However, each flap has its own nuances and characteristics that influence patient and physician choice. Of note, each newly introduced flap, either buttock or thigh, results in a sharp decline in its predecessor. In this practice, the DIEP flap has remained the first choice in autologous breast reconstruction.

Radial Artery Fascial Flow-Through Free Flap for Complex Cerebral Revascularization: Technical Notes and Long-Term Neurologic and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation is critical for the management of challenging cerebrovascular pathology. Flow-through free flaps are versatile composite grafts that combine viable tissue with a revascularization source. Neurosurgical experience with these flaps is limited. OBJECTIVE: To provide an in-depth technical description of the radial artery fascial (and fasciocutaneous) flow-through free flap (RAFF and RAFCF, respectively) for complex cerebral revascularizations. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients that underwent extracranial-to-intracranial cerebral bypass with a RAFF or RAFCF. Patient demographics, underlying pathology, surgical treatment, complications, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 4 patients were treated with RAFFs or RAFCFs (average age 40 ± 8.8 yr). Two patients with progressive moyamoya disease involving multiple vascular territories with predominantly anterior cerebral artery (ACA) symptoms and flow alterations underwent combined direct ACA and indirect middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass with a RAFF. The third patient with moyamoya disease and concomitant proximal fusiform aneurysms requiring internal carotid artery sacrifice underwent dual direct ACA and MCA bypass and indirect MCA revascularization with posterior tibial artery and RAFF grafts. The fourth patient with a large MCA bifurcation aneurysm and recurrent wound complications underwent a direct MCA bypass and complex wound reconstruction using a RAFCF. Good neurologic outcomes (Glasgow Outcomes Scale score ≥4 at discharge) were achieved in all patients. There were no perioperative surgical complications, and graft patency was confirmed on long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: The RAFF and RAFCF are versatile grafts for complex cerebral revascularizations.

Current practice trends in microvascular free flap reconstruction by fellowship-trained otolaryngologists.

PURPOSE: In the field of head and neck microvascular surgery, there are currently no clear, universally accepted recommendations on the intraoperative, preoperative, and postoperative management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 23-question cross-sectional survey was distributed to otolaryngologists who perform microvascular reconstruction. Information about practice setting, fellowship training background, intraoperative practice, postoperative practice, and surgical complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete survey responses were received from 102 (32.8% response rate) of surveyed otolaryngologists who perform microvascular surgery. A great degree of variability was noted in intraoperative and postoperative care of free flap patients. Overall, self-reported free flap survival-rates were relatively high, despite the variability in practice, with the majority of surgeons (74%) reporting flap survival rate of 96-100%. Complication rates requiring return to the operating room were low; all respondents reported <20% overall complications with <10% re-operation rates due to vascular complications. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of microvascular-trained otolaryngologists are performing free flaps. Self-reported free flap survival rates are high and complication rates are low, despite significant variability in intraoperative and postoperative practices among otolaryngologists performing microvascular flap reconstruction. By identifying these differences among surgeons, we hope to provide the impetus for further academic dialog and prospective trials.

De-escalation of surgery for early oral cancer--is it oncologically safe?

This study is a review of practice for patients with T1 or T2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anterior tongue and floor of the mouth who presented to the regional maxillofacial unit in Liverpool between 1992 and 2007. We examined trends in management and analysed their effects on resection margins, recurrence, and survival. The Liverpool head and neck oncology database was used to identify patients, and to retrieve their clinical, surgical, and pathological data. When data were missing the case notes and pathology records were reviewed. Follow up was taken to January 2011. A total of 382 patients were included. Despite more conservative treatment with closer resection margins (27% in 1992-1995 and 60% in 2004-2007), fewer free flaps (79% in 1992-1995 and 38% in 2004-2007), and less adjuvant radiotherapy (37% in 1992-1995 and 22% in 2004-2007), there has been no significant increase in local recurrence (14% in 1992-1996 and 8% in 2004-2007), and overall survival has not been adversely affected. This is most striking when T1 tumours are considered in isolation with a consistent trend towards fewer clear margins (95% in 1992-1995 and 28% in 2004-2007) and fewer free flaps (53% in 1992-1995 and 11% in 2004-2007). The case mix was similar over the study period. These data support a more conservative approach to the management of early oral cancer.

Salvage outcomes of free tissue transfer in Liverpool: trends over 18 years (1992-2009).

Reconstruction of surgical defects in the head and neck using microvascular free tissue transfer is reliable with success rates in excess of 95%. Our previous audit (1992-1998) showed that 16% of patients required an early return to theatre, and the overall free flap salvage rate was 73%. The medical records of 37 patients who had required early return to theatre (within 7 days) after free tissue transfer were analysed to ascertain the indication for reoperation, and whether surgical intervention had been successful, taking into account the timing and cause of compromise. The results of a retrospective re-audit (1999-2004 and 2005-2009) showed that the return to theatre rate had reduced to 4% overall because of a reduction in the number of cases: those that required evacuation of a neck haematoma, and venous compromise of fasciocutaneous or perforator free flaps. Salvage of flaps was most successful when done within the first 24h, and in cases of venous compromise. Three percent of free flaps failed without attempted salvage; most were late failures. Overall survival (1992-2009) for composite free flaps (93%) was lower than for fasciocutaneous or perforator free flaps (96%). Between 2005 and 2009 our overall free flap survival rate was 98%.