Pseudogestational Sac Delaying Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy can be complicated by nonspecific laboratory and radiographic findings. The multiple alternative diagnoses must be weighed against each other based on the entire clinical presentation. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 20-year-old woman who arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) with abdominal pain and ended up being transferred for an Obstetrics evaluation of a possible heterotopic pregnancy. Her radiology-performed ultrasound had revealed an "intrauterine gestational sac" along with an adnexal mass near the right ovary. The patient was not undergoing assisted-reproductive fertilization, nor did she have meaningful risk factors for heterotopic pregnancy. The patient was managed expectantly over the ensuing week to see whether the intrauterine fluid was a true gestational sac. After multiple repeat ED visits, the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made. Ultimately, the patient elected for surgical management of her ectopic pregnancy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case offers a reminder of the subtleties of radiographic identification of intrauterine pregnancies and the ever-present need to "clinically correlate."

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 74 patients diagnosed with CP at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 31 were treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic curettage, 34 were treated with hysteroscopic curettage alone, and nine were treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed by hysteroscopic curettage. Medical records and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gravidity, parity, abortion, or preoperative hemoglobin levels among the patients in the three groups; however, significant differences in gestational age, gestational sac diameter, preoperative ß-hCG, and presence of cardiac pulsation were observed (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no conversion to laparotomy, and the uterus was preserved in all patients. Significant differences in blood loss during curettage, hospitalization costs, hospital days, menstrual recovery interval, ß-hCG decline rates, retained products of conception, and intrauterine adhesions rate among the three groups were observed (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the placement of the uterine Foley balloon, effective curettage rate, pre-and postoperative hemoglobin decline, live birth rate, or proportion of subsequent pregnancies among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that hysteroscopic curettage, HIFU, and UAE followed by hysteroscopic curettage are safe and effective for treating patients with CP. Compared with the UAE, HIFU has the advantages of lower hospitalization costs, shorter hospital stays, and shorter menstrual recovery intervals.

Bioavailability of the tumor necrosis factor alpha/regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) biosystem inside the gestational sac during the pre-immune stages of embryo development.

OBJECTIVES: In-vivo studies of the bioavailability of major components of the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) biosystem inside the gestational sac during embryogenesis have not been reported. We sought to determine the concentration of TNFα, soluble (s) TNFα receptors (sTNFR1, sTNFR2), and RANTES in the primate extraembryonic celomic fluid (ECF). METHODS: A validated timed-pregnant baboon animal model (N: 10) for experimental research in pregnancy was used to collect paired maternal blood and ECF samples in ongoing pregnancies. The concentrations (pg/dL) of TNFα, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, and RANTES were then determined by ELISA immunoassays. RESULTS: All animals delivered at term healthy newborns. The differential concentration of TNFα, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, and RANTES between the maternal plasma and the ECF could be determined with ratios for TNFα (5.4), sTNFR2 (1.85) and RANTES (3.59) that contrasted with that of sTNFR1 (0.07), which favored the gestational sac compartment. No significant correlations were noted between maternal plasma and ECF TNFR1, sTNFR2 and RANTES. There was a trend for a correlation between TNFα in maternal plasma and ECF (R=0.74; p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: We report the physiological concentrations of TNFα, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, and RANTES in extraembryonic celomic fluid during embryogenesis in primates.

The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and guiding therapy of early cervical ectopic pregnancy.

We described the ultrasonic imaging characteristics of four patients with cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) and inevitable miscarriage (IM) with the gestational sac (GS) located at the level of the cervical canal discussed and analyzed them in combination with relevant data, such as surgery and outcomes. It was found that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could provide a more accurate differential diagnosis of early CEP and IM than conventional ultrasound (US), thus providing more effective guidance for clinical therapy. In CEP, CEUS shows sustained annular hyperenhancement of the GS wall. However, CEUS shows nonenhancement or pedicle-like enhancement in IM with the GS located at the level of the cervical canal.

The incidence and importance of the pseudogestational sac revisited.

BACKGROUND: In a pregnancy of unknown location, an intrauterine fluid collection may represent either the early gestational sac of an intrauterine pregnancy, or as reported in previous literature, the pseudogestational sac of an ectopic pregnancy. Various sonographic features have been used to distinguish these 2 entities, but the clinical relevance of the pseudogestational sac remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence and relative rate of intrauterine fluid collection among ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies and to determine if the size of the collection differs between ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with pregnancies of unknown location and pelvic or abdominal pain or bleeding. We calculated the incidences of intrauterine fluid collections among ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies, including both ongoing pregnancies and spontaneous abortions, given that that our focus was location and not viability. We calculated the relative risk of ectopic pregnancy if an intrauterine fluid collection was present, adjusting for age and vaginal bleeding. We compared the incidences of ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies among those with and without intrauterine fluid collections. Among those with collections, we compared the mean sac diameter between ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies in continuous and categorical fashions. RESULTS: We evaluated 1236 women presenting with a pregnancy of unknown location. The rates of ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies (including spontaneous abortions) were 13.1% and 63.9%, respectively, with the remainder lost to follow-up. On ultrasound, 452 women (36.6%) had an intrauterine fluid collection. Eight of 162 ectopic pregnancies (4.9%) had a collection, compared with 363 of 789 intrauterine pregnancies (46.0%) (P=.01). Of the ectopics with a fluid collection, 5 had an adnexal mass. The presence of intrauterine fluid collection decreased the risk of ectopic pregnancy (adjusted relative risk, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.19) after adjusting for age and the presence of bleeding. Among those with an intrauterine fluid collection, the rate of ectopic pregnancy was 2.2%, and the rate of intrauterine pregnancy was 97.8%; among those without a collection, the rate of ectopic pregnancy was 26.7%, and the rate of intrauterine pregnancy was 73.3%. The mean sac diameter did not differ between ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies, whether analyzed continuously or categorically. CONCLUSION: In the presence of an intrauterine fluid collection, the rate of ectopic pregnancy is very low. The size of the intrauterine fluid collection in a woman with a pregnancy of unknown location cannot be used to distinguish between a gestational sac and a pseudogestational sac. Pseudogestational sacs are uncommon and of little clinical consequence. In assessing pregnancies of unknown location, clinicians should incorporate the entire clinical picture, including other sonographic findings, to avoid incorrect or delayed diagnoses.

Using MRI to differentiate upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy for the patients with pregnancies in the uterotubal junction during the first trimester.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI for the uterotubal junctional pregnancies during the first trimester. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 59 patients (January 2016 to July 2021) with a preoperative imaging diagnosis of uterotubal junctional pregnancy. Using operative and pathological reports as the reference standard, we identified 22 patients with upper-lateral intracavitary (angular) pregnancy and 37 patients with interstitial pregnancy. Two senior radiologists, blinded to the patients' information, reviewed the MRI images and determined each MRI feature based on the original interpretation criteria. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion to achieve a consensus. The sensitivity and specificity of each MRI feature were calculated according to the reference standard. RESULTS: The endometrial thickness in the upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy group was larger than in the interstitial group (p = 0.001). The cutoff value of the endometrial thickness was 11.5 mm with a sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve that were 77.3%, 64.9%, and 0.743, respectively. Two key features to diagnose upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy were "medial free edge" and "medial free edge plus above-cutoff endometrial thickness." The sensitivity and specificity of the medial free edge were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the medial free edge plus above-cutoff endometrial thickness were 77.3% and 100%, respectively. The key feature to diagnose interstitial pregnancy was an "intact lateral junctional zone," of which the sensitivity and specificity were 94.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can be used to differentiate the upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy during the first trimester. KEY POINTS: • We demonstrated MRI diagnostic criteria for the interstitial pregnancy and upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy. • MRI might be used to identify the complex interstitial pregnancies, those with a gestational sac protruding into the uterine cavity.

Automated prediction of early spontaneous miscarriage based on the analyzing ultrasonographic gestational sac imaging by the convolutional neural network: a case-control and cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to predict the outcome of the pregnancy when fetal heart activity is detected in early pregnancy. However, an accurate prediction is of importance for obstetricians as it helps to provide appropriate consultancy and determine the frequency of ultrasound examinations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the convolutional neural network (CNN) in the prediction of spontaneous miscarriage risk through the analysis of early ultrasound gestational sac images. METHODS: A total of 2196 ultrasound images from 1098 women with early singleton pregnancies of gestational age between 6 and 8 weeks were used for training a CNN for the prediction of the miscarriage in the retrospective study. The patients who had positive fetal cardiac activity on their first ultrasound but then experienced a miscarriage were enrolled. The control group was randomly selected in the same database from the fetuses confirmed to be normal during follow-up. Diagnostic performance of the algorithm was validated and tested in two separate test sets of 136 patients with 272 images, respectively. Performance in prediction of the miscarriage was compared between the CNN and the manual measurement of ultrasound characteristics in the prospective study. RESULTS: The accuracy of the predictive model was 80.32% and 78.1% in the retrospective and prospective study, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classification was 0.857 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.793-0.922) in the retrospective study and 0.885 (95%CI, 0.846-0.925) in the prospective study, respectively. Correspondingly, the predictive power of the CNN was higher compared with manual ultrasound characteristics, for which the AUCs of the crown-rump length combined with fetal heart rate was 0.687 (95%CI, 0.587-0.775). CONCLUSIONS: The CNN model showed high accuracy for predicting miscarriage through the analysis of early pregnancy ultrasound images and achieved better performance than that of manual measurement.

Multidisciplinary treatment of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) is an extremely rare type of ectopic pregnancy, with a total of less than 32 cases reported in the English literature. Early diagnosis of REP is very difficult and all treatments entail a high risk of life-threatening complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old nulliparous woman presented a history of 50-day amenorrhea and 7-day upper abdominal pain without vaginal spotting. The serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) value was 65,004 m-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL), but no intrauterine gestational sac was found via transvaginal sonography (TVS). Then transabdominal ultrasonography (TAS) and abdominal contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) identified a retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) tightly adjacent to the inferior vena cava and the abdominal aorta. After consultation from a multidisciplinary team, systemic methotrexate (MTX, intramuscular 20 mg daily for 5 consecutive days) combined with ultrasound-guided local potassium chloride solution injection into the gestational sac was scheduled firstly for the patient. However, serum ß-hCG continued to increase and the patient experienced worsening abdominal pain. Laparotomy was performed jointly by a gynecologist and a vascular surgeon. During the operation, the gestational sac with fetal bud measuring about 4.5 × 4.0x3.0 cm, tightly adherent to the surface of inferior vena cava and the left side of abdominal aorta, was carefully dissociated out from the surrounding tissues and removed en bloc. Histopathology examination confirmed the diagnosis of REP. The patient recovered uneventfully and her serum ß-hCG returned to normal range on the 23th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the possibility of REP and combined radiological examinations, such as ultrasonography and CT, are crucial for the early diagnosis of this rare condition. A multidisciplinary team is necessary to treat REP.

A mathematical model to predict the probability of a successful pregnancy.

AIM: To develop a scoring system for the prediction of a successful pregnancy. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from women diagnosed with pregnancy from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Pregnant days, hormone levels, and gestational sac diameters were recorded. Relationships among the pregnancy days, hormones, and gestational sac were analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis. A scoring system was established and stratified by the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentile of hormone levels and gestational sac diameters on different pregnancy days. Pregnancy outcomes were predicted by the scores using quadratic polynomial regression analyses. A portable desktop analyzer was developed and the performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: In 273 successful pregnancy cases, the length of gestational days was significantly correlated to beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and E2 (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) levels, and the size of the gestational sac (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the size of gestational sac was positively correlated with ß-hCG (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) and E2 (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). For 273 delivery and 103 miscarriage cases included in this study, our scoring-based prediction model rendered an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.86 with the sensitivity of 78.31% and the specificity of 80.83%. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a scoring-based analyzer to evaluate the viability of embryos at different gestation stages and to predict the probability of a successful delivery, which would provide a reference for clinicians in postpregnancy management.

Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.

BACKGROUND: Medical management of early pregnancy loss is an alternative to uterine aspiration, but standard medical treatment with misoprostol commonly results in treatment failure. We compared the efficacy and safety of pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol with the efficacy and safety of misoprostol use alone for the management of early pregnancy loss. METHODS: We randomly assigned 300 women who had an anembryonic gestation or in whom embryonic or fetal death was confirmed to receive pretreatment with 200 mg of mifepristone, administered orally, followed by 800 µg of misoprostol, administered vaginally (mifepristone-pretreatment group), or 800 µg of misoprostol alone, administered vaginally (misoprostol-alone group). Participants returned 1 to 4 days after misoprostol use for evaluation, including ultrasound examination, by an investigator who was unaware of the treatment-group assignments. Women in whom the gestational sac was not expelled were offered expectant management, a second dose of misoprostol, or uterine aspiration. We followed all participants for 30 days after randomization. Our primary outcome was gestational sac expulsion with one dose of misoprostol by the first follow-up visit and no additional intervention within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: Complete expulsion after one dose of misoprostol occurred in 124 of 148 women (83.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8 to 89.3) in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 100 of 149 women (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 74.6) in the misoprostol-alone group (relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.43). Uterine aspiration was performed less frequently in the mifepristone-pretreatment group than in the misoprostol-alone group (8.8% vs. 23.5%; relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.68). Bleeding that resulted in blood transfusion occurred in 2.0% of the women in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 0.7% of the women in the misoprostol-alone group (P=0.31); pelvic infection was diagnosed in 1.3% of the women in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol resulted in a higher likelihood of successful management of first-trimester pregnancy loss than treatment with misoprostol alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; PreFaiR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02012491 .).

Predictive value of presence of amniotic sac without visible embryonic heartbeat in diagnosis of early embryonic demise.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value and impact on management of visualizing on ultrasound an amniotic sac without a live embryo (amniotic sac sign). We also examined the potential effect on the number of follow-up visits in early pregnancy units of incorporating this sign into current diagnostic algorithms. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of all pregnant women who attended a single specialist early pregnancy unit from July 2017 to November 2018 with symptoms of pain and/or bleeding, or with a history of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage, at < 14 weeks' gestation. Detailed initial ultrasound findings were documented, including whether an amniotic sac was present in a normally sited intrauterine pregnancy with absence of a live embryo. Women were followed up until a conclusive diagnosis was made. RESULTS: The study included 6012 women who attended our unit with early pregnancy complications during the study period. A conclusive diagnosis was reached on the initial scan in 4221 (70.2%), whilst 1135 (18.9%) women had a pregnancy of uncertain viability and 656 (10.9%) had a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). All women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability required follow-up ultrasound scans to differentiate between a live pregnancy and early embryonic demise. An amniotic sac in the absence of a live embryo was found in 174/1135 (15.3%) women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability at the initial ultrasound scan. The diagnosis of early embryonic demise was confirmed in all 134 of these women who attended their follow-up scans. The presence of an amniotic sac without a live embryo at the initial visit had a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 98.53-100.00%) and positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 97.2-100.0%) for the diagnosis of early pregnancy failure. A total of 1403/6012 (23.3%) women were asked to attend for a follow-up ultrasound scan to resolve diagnostic uncertainties, including 268/656 (40.9%) women with a PUL. The majority of follow-up scans needed to reach a conclusive diagnosis were in women with a pregnancy of uncertain viability (1135/1403 (80.9%)). By using the presence of the amniotic sac sign to diagnose early pregnancy failure at the first visit, the number of follow-up scans for pregnancies of uncertain viability would be reduced by 14.4%, which accounted for 11% of all follow-up scans during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The finding on ultrasound of an amniotic sac without a live embryo (amniotic sac sign) is a reliable marker of early pregnancy failure and could reduce the number of follow-up scans by 11% in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

First-Trimester Prognosis When an Early Gestational Sac is Seen on Ultrasound Imaging: Logistic Regression Prediction Model.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors that jointly and independently affect first-trimester outcome of very early intrauterine pregnancies (those whose sonogram shows a gestational sac with no identifiable yolk sac or embryo) and develop a mathematical model and Web-based calculator that computes prognosis based on these factors. METHODS: Our study population included 590 very early pregnancies scanned between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2018, with known outcomes (live or spontaneous loss) at 14 weeks. We recorded patient age, mean sac diameter (MSD), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rise, and presence/absence of: vaginal bleeding, history of infertility, prior miscarriage, and pregnancy via assisted reproductive technology. We assessed the correlation between each of these factors and outcome and performed stepwise logistic regression to determine the subset that independently correlated with outcome. RESULTS: Patient age, MSD, hCG rise, vaginal bleeding, history of infertility, and assisted reproductive technology pregnancy were significantly correlated with outcome (P < .05, t test for age and MSD, χ2 for the others). Stepwise logistic regression identified age, MSD, hCG rise, and vaginal bleeding as the subset of factors that independently predicted outcome. The regression model's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.823. We incorporated the regression model into a Web-based calculator (https://tinyurl.com/Prognosis-PD) that predicts the outcome of an early intrauterine pregnancy based on these 4 key variables. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of very early intrauterine pregnancies is related to several clinical, biochemical, and sonographic factors. The factors that independently correlate with first-trimester outcome are patient age, MSD, hCG rise, and vaginal bleeding. The logistic regression model predicts outcome based on these variables.

Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the serious complications associated with cesarean delivery (CD). This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with massive hemorrhage during the CSP treatment. METHODS: Eight electronic databases were searched for case-control studies published before December 31th, 2018, which compared the possible factors causing massive bleeding during the CSP treatment. Quantitative synthesis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed by Stata 12.0. RESULTS: Total 20 case - control studies including 3101 CSP patients with previous CD met the inclusion criteria. Bleeding group had 573 patients and the control group had 2528 patients. The risk factors for massive bleeding during CSP treatment included multiple gravidities (MD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.28, P = 0.73), big maximum diameter of gestation sac (MD = 18.49 mm, 95%CI 15.34-21.65, P < 0.01), high gestational days (MD = 8.98 days, 95% CI 4.12-13.84, P < 0.01), high ß-HCG level (MD = 21.39 IU/ml, 95% CI 7.36-35.41, P = 0.03; MD = 3.02 U/ml, 95% CI 0.21-5.84, P < 0.01) and rich blood flow around the lesion (OR = 6.73, 95% CI 3.93-11.51, P = 0.59). While, thick myometrium (MD = - 4.94 mm, 95% CI - 6.12 to - 3.75, P < 0.01) may be protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple gravidities, big gestation sac, large gestational days, high serum ß-HCG level, abundant blood supply to pregnancy sac and thin myometrium maybe the risk factors for massive bleeding during the CSP treatment.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy.

Cesarean scar pregnancy is a complication in which an early pregnancy implants in the scar from a prior cesarean delivery. This condition presents a substantial risk for severe maternal morbidity because of challenges in securing a prompt diagnosis, as well as uncertainty regarding optimal treatment once identified. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for cesarean scar pregnancy diagnosis, although a correct and timely determination can be difficult. Surgical, medical, and minimally invasive therapies have been described for cesarean scar pregnancy management, but the optimal treatment is not known. Women who decline treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy should be counseled regarding the risk for severe morbidity. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: We recommend against expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1B); we suggest operative resection (with transvaginal or laparoscopic approaches when possible) or ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration be considered for surgical management of cesarean scar pregnancy and that sharp curettage alone be avoided (GRADE 2C); we suggest intragestational methotrexate for medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, with or without other treatment modalities (GRADE 2C); we recommend that systemic methotrexate alone not be used to treat cesarean scar pregnancy (GRADE 1C); in women who choose expectant management and continuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy, we recommend repeat cesarean delivery between 34 0/7 and 35 6/7 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); we recommend that women with a cesarean scar pregnancy be advised of the risks of another pregnancy and counseled regarding effective contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception and permanent contraception (GRADE 1C).

Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac, embryonic length, embryonic heart rate at 6-10 weeks after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

BACKGROUND: Accurately determining the normal range of early pregnancy markers can help to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. The variance in ovulation days leads to uncertain accuracy of reference intervals for natural pregnancies. While the gestational age (GA) is accurate estimation during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Thus, the objective of this research is to construct reference intervals for gestational sac diameter (GSD), yolk sac diameter (YSD), embryonic length (or crown-rump length, CRL) and embryonic heart rate (HR) at 6-10 gestational weeks (GW) after IVF-ET. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2016, 30,416 eligible singleton pregnancies were retrospectively recruited. All included participants had full records of early ultrasound measurements and phenotypically normal live neonates after 37 GW, with birth weights > the 5th percentile for gestational age. The curve-fitting method was used to screen the optimal models to predict GSD, CRL, YSD and HR based on gestational days (GD) and GW. Additionally, the percentile method was used to calculate the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles. RESULTS: There were significant associations among GSD, CRL, YSD, HR and GD and GW, the models were GSD = - 29.180 + 1.070 GD (coefficient of determination [R2] = 0.796), CRL = - 11.960 - 0.147 GD + 0.011 GD2 (R2 = 0.976), YSD = - 2.304 + 0.184 GD - 0.011 GD2 (R2 = 0.500), HR = - 350.410 + 15.398 GD - 0.112 GD2 (R2 = 0.911); and GSD = - 29.180 + 7.492 GW (R2 = 0.796), CRL = - 11.960 - 1.028 GW + 0.535 GW2 (R2 = 0.976), YSD = - 2.304 + 1.288 GW - 0.054 GW2 (R2 = 0.500), HR = - 350.410 + 107.788 GW - 5.488 GW2 (R2 = 0.911), (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reference intervals for GSD, YSD, HR and CRL at 6-10 gestational weeks after IVF-ET were established.

Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of nontubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) management with direct methotrexate (MTX) injection into the gestational sac. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: A tertiary academic and teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All cases of confirmed NTEP were retrospectively identified from 2012 to 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided direct injection of MTX into the fetal pole and surrounding gestational sac and a single dose of systemic MTX with or without fetal intracardiac injection of potassium chloride. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Treatment failure, complications from treatment, operating time, and days to negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after treatment were measured. Fourteen women (age 34 ± 5.2 years) with NTEP underwent direct MTX injection (cesarean scar, n = 4; interstitial, n = 6; cervical, n = 4). The mean estimated gestational age was 49 ± 11, CI (43, 56 days). One patient required laparoscopic intervention with a failure rate of 1 of 14 (a double interstitial, heterotopic pregnancy). There were no other major complications. The time in the operating room was similar for all NTEP types. The average time to negative serum hCG was not different for cesarean scar (84.5 ± 36 days), cervical pregnancies (70.5 ± 19 days), or interstitial pregnancies (45.3 ± 38 days, p = .15). CONCLUSION: Direct MTX injection into the gestational sac for NTEP treatment is safe and effective. The failure rate of 7% is considerably lower than what was previously reported for a failure of systemic MTX in similar cases (25%). Resolution of serum hCG after treatment can be quite prolonged even in uncomplicated cases.

"Pseudogestational Sac" and Other 1980s-Era Concepts in Early First-Trimester Ultrasound: Are They Still Relevant Today?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an intrauterine round or oval fluid collection ("saclike structure") can prove to be either an intrauterine pregnancy or intrauterine fluid in conjunction with an ectopic pregnancy (sometimes termed "pseudogestational sac") and whether ultrasound features, including the presence or absence of an echogenic rim, "double sac sign" (DSS), or "intradecidual sign" (IDS), are helpful for establishing the diagnosis or predicting the prognosis. METHODS: We identified all sonograms obtained from women with positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin results at our institution between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2018, meeting the following criteria: presence of an intrauterine saclike structure without a yolk sac or embryo; no extraovarian adnexal mass; and follow-up information identifying the location of the pregnancy as intrauterine or ectopic. Study authors reviewed sonograms in all cases and recorded the following information: presence or absence of each of an echogenic rim around the collection, a DSS, and an IDS, as well as the mean sac diameter. The indications for the initial ultrasound examinations were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 649 sonograms met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 598 fluid collections showed an echogenic rim, 182 a DSS, and 347 an IDS (findings not mutually exclusive). In all 649 cases, a subsequent sonogram or other clinical follow-up confirmed that the patient had an intrauterine pregnancy. That is, none of the fluid collections proved to be a pseudogestational sac. In total, 41.2% were live at the end of the first trimester, and 58.8% miscarried. The prognosis was better in cases with, compared to without, an IDS (P = .01, χ2 ), but no ultrasound feature was clinically useful for ruling in or excluding a good prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: In a woman with positive human chorionic gonadotropin results and no extraovarian adnexal mass, the ultrasound finding of an intrauterine saclike structure is virtually certain to be a gestational sac. Ultrasound features of the structure are of no diagnostic or clinically useful prognostic value. Concepts introduced 30 to 40 years ago when ultrasound equipment had far lower resolution than currently, including a DDS, an IDS, and a pseudogestational sac, have no role today in assessing early pregnancy.

Prediction of Delivery Complications by First-Trimester Ultrasound Measurement of the Gestational Sac's Distance From a Previous Cesarean Section Scar.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the clinical relationship between labor complications in the second and third trimesters and the distance from the gestational sac to a previous cesarean section (CS) scar. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the electronic medical records and included all 7- to 9-week transvaginal ultrasound examination reports from pregnancies with a history of a single cesarean delivery in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017. Women were divided into 6 groups according to the distance of the gestational sac to the CS scar (groups A-F). A composite of pregnancy outcomes (gestational age at birth, delivery mode, placental abnormality, blood loss, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy) and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 699 cases were included in our study. The median gestational age was 39.0 (range, 38.1-39.9) weeks. The median intrapartum blood loss volume was 400 (range, 300-500) mL. The results showed no statistically significant difference in blood loss (P = .297) or birth weight of the neonate (P = .318) among the distance subgroups. Overall, the fetuses were stillborn in 9 of 699 cases (1.29%). There was a statistically significant difference in a morbidly adherent placenta, placenta previa, and preterm labor, and their incidence increased with decreasing distance (P < .001; P for trend < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in uterine rupture (P = .597) or the delivery mode (P = .187) among the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The relative positions of a CS scar and the gestational sac in the first trimester are associated with the incidence of placental abnormalities. As the distance decreases, the extent of a morbidly adherent placenta increases.

Local intra-gestational sac methotrexate injection followed by dilation and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of local intra-gestational sac methotrexate injection followed by dilation and curettage (D&C) in treating cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP). METHOD: Medical records of CSP patients treated with local intra-gestational sac methotrexate injection followed by dilation and curettage were analyzed at the Maternal and Child Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in this study. The mean gestational age, sac diameter and thickness of the uterine scar were 49.6 ± 7.7 days, 1.8 ± 0.6 cm and 0.30 ± 0.15 cm, respectively. The median pretreatment serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) level was 40,887 mIU/mL, with the 25th and 75th percentiles at 19,852 and 74,552, respectively. The median blood loss during D&C was 20 mL with the 25th and 75th percentiles at 10 mL and 50 mL. Following D&C, a Foley's balloon catheter compression was implanted in 26 (83.9%) patients due to active uterine bleeding. All patients had a ß-HCG regression time of ≤ 4 weeks after D&C. While 30 patients (96.8%) had a uterine recovery time of ≤ 4 weeks, and 29 patients (93.5%) had resumption of menstruation of less than 6 weeks. Three patients (9.7%) had complications. One of them suffered from massive vaginal bleeding and underwent s blood transfusion. There were no other complications, such as pelvic infection and uterine rupture during the procedures. And no patient was converted to surgical resection or uterine artery embolization. Overall, 30 patients (96.8%) were treated successfully. CONCLUSION: Local intra-gestational sac methotrexate injection followed by D&C with the aid of a Foley's balloon catheter compression appears to be a safe and effective treatment for CSP. Further randomized controlled trials are suggested to confirm these findings.

Predictors of complete miscarriage after expectant management or misoprostol treatment of non-viable early pregnancy in women with vaginal bleeding.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of complete miscarriage after expectant management or misoprostol treatment of non-viable early pregnancy in women with vaginal bleeding. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of data from a published randomized controlled trial comparing expectant management with vaginal single dose of 800 µg misoprostol treatment of women with embryonic or anembryonic miscarriage. Predefined variables-serum-progesterone, serum-ß-human chorionic gonadotropin, parity, previous vaginal deliveries, gestational age, clinical symptoms (bleeding and pain), mean diameter and shape of the gestational sac, crown-rump-length, type of miscarriage, and presence of blood flow in the intervillous space-were tested as predictors of treatment success (no gestational sac in the uterine cavity and maximum anterior-posterior intracavitary diameter was ≤ 15 mm as measured with transvaginal ultrasound on a sagittal view) in univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Variables from 174 women (83 expectant management versus 91 misoprostol) were analyzed for prediction of complete miscarriage at ≤ 17 days. In patients managed expectantly, the rate of complete miscarriage was 62.7% (32/51) in embryonic miscarriages versus 37.5% (12/32) in anembryonic miscarriages (P = 0.02). In multivariable logistic regression, the likelihood of success increased with increasing gestational age, increasing crown-rump-length and decreasing gestational sac diameter. Misoprostol treatment was successful in 80.0% (73/91). No variable predicted success of misoprostol treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Complete miscarriage after expectant management is significantly more likely in embryonic miscarriage than in anembryonic miscarriage. Gestational age, crown-rump-length, and gestational sac diameter are independent predictors of success of expectant management. Predictors of treatment success may help counselling women with early miscarriage.