Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Internal Branch Block of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Reduces Postoperative Sore Throat Caused by Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is one of the more common side effects of tracheal intubation patients under general anesthesia (GA) after extubation using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). The internal branches of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block (iSLNB) have been reported to anesthetize the larynx for airway manipulation (such as awake tracheal intubation) and pain treatment efficiently. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided iSLNB (US-guided iSLNB) combined with GA would ameliorate the incidence and severity of POST and hoarseness. METHODS: Patients (n = 82) undergoing thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodules/lobes/segments with one-lung ventilation (OLV) under GA were randomized into 2 groups depending on whether performed with iSLNB (S group, n = 41) or not (C group, n = 41) under GA. Patients in the S group received US-guided iSLNB bilaterally before surgery. POST and hoarseness were assessed at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of POST at 6 hours after surgery between groups. RESULTS: The overall accumulated incidence of POST was lower in the S goup than in the C group (9/41 vs 20/41; 95% CI, 0.30 [0.11-0.77]; P = .011). The incidence and severity of POST was lower in the S group than in the C group at 2 hours (9/41 vs 20/41; 95% CI, 0.30 [0.11-0.77]; P = .008 and P = .004) and 6 hours after (7/41 vs 17/41; 95% CI, 0.29 [0.10-0.81]; P = .012 and P = .015) surgery. The incidence and severity of POST at 24 hours after surgery was nonsignificant. However, the incidence and severity of hoarseness was comparable between the 2 groups at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative US-guided iSLNB could significantly ameliorate the incidence and severity of POST induced by double-lumen bronchial catheter intubation.

Effect of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat in patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST) after tracheal intubation using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) is higher in patients with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than in the general population. This prospective trial was conducted to determine whether thermal softening of DLTs could decrease the incidence of POST or other airway injuries in patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 60 each). In the thermal softening group, the distal portion of the DLT was placed in thermostatic saline (50 °C) for 10 min before endotracheal intubation. In the control group, the distal portion of the DLT was placed in room temperature saline for 10 min before endotracheal intubation. The incidence and severity of POST and hoarseness were assessed at 1, 6 and 24 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of POST at 6 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the incidence and severity of hoarseness, vocal cord and tracheal injuries, and hemodynamic changes in patients at intubation. RESULTS: The incidence of POST at 6 h postoperatively was greater in the control group than in the thermal softening group [41 (68%) vs. 22 (37%), P = 0.001]. The overall incidence of POST at 24 h postoperatively was greater in the control group than in the thermal softening group [46 (76%) vs. 24 (40%), P < 0.001]. The overall incidence of tracheal injuries was also greater in the control group than in the thermal softening group (P = 0.016). Vocal cord injuries occurred more frequently in the control group than in the thermal softening group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Thermal softening of DLTs before intubation can reduce the incidence of POST and airway injuries in patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing DLT insertion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered at www.chictr.org.cn (registration number: ChiCTR2200066821; registration date: December 19, 2022).

Right displacement of trachea to reduce right bronchial misplacement of left double lumen tube: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Misplacement of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) during bronchial intubation, especially when bronchoscopy guidance is not applicable, threatens effective lung isolation and brings about airway injury during reposition. We aimed to examine whether a novel maneuver called right tracheal displacement (RTD) can reduce left-sided DLT misplacement during first-attempt intubation without bronchoscopy guidance. METHODS: Patients that underwent thoracic surgeries requiring one-lung ventilation during November 2020 to January 2021 were recruited and randomized into control and RTD group, with 54 cases in each group. The primary outcomes included the incidence of DLT misplacement and the time to complete desired bronchial intubation. The secondary outcomes included mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness upon emergence and at 24 h post-operatively. RESULT: The incidence of DLT misplacement in RTD group was significantly lower compared to control group (0% vs. 16.7%) The time to complete bronchial intubation was also significantly shortened in RTD group compared to control (52.88 ± 9.36 s vs. 63.04 ± 20.02 s). The incidence of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSION: RTD maneuver can effectively improve the success rate of first-attempt proper DLT positioning and shorten the time required by bronchial intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective, double-blind, randomized study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 2/11/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000040212. It was conducted from 26/11/2020 to 31/7/2021 in third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen university.

Effects of Thermal Softening of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes on the Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat in Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Tracheal intubation-related complications, such as postoperative sore throat (POST), hoarseness, and vocal cords injuries, are not uncommon. It is well known that thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) has been used to prevent these events from happening in non-smokers; however, no study has ever assessed the effects of thermal softening of DLTs in smokers undergoing one-lung anesthesia. The authors aimed to investigate whether thermal softening of DLT can achieve a better effect in preventing POST. DESIGN: A total of 258 smokers scheduled for one-lung anesthesia were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 2 groups: (1) group C (non-thermal softening group) and (2) group T (DLTs were placed in 40°C 0.9% saline for 10 minutes). Incidence and severity of POST and hoarseness were assessed until 48 hours after surgery. Vocal cords were examined using laryngoscope before intubation and immediately after extubation. Patients' hemodynamic change at intubation and extubation was recorded. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of POST. The secondary outcomes were the incidence and severity of hoarseness, vocal cords injuries, and patients' hemodynamic change at intubation and extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sore throat and vocal cord injuries occurred less frequently in the thermal softening group than in the control group (31/129 v 60/129, p < 0.01; 21/129 v 49/129, p < 0.001; 12/129 v 35/129, p < 0.001 for sore throat; 14/70 v 27/70, risk ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.52 (0.30-0.90), p = 0.025 for sore throat; 5/129 v 52/129, p < 0.05 for vocal cord injuries). CONCLUSION: Thermal softening of DLTs significantly reduced the incidence and severity of DLTs intubation-related POST within 72 hours after extubation.

A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There are doubts among anesthesiologists on the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in nasal surgeries because of concerns about the occurrence of blood leakages to the airway. We hypothesized that the use of LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) in nasal surgery is comparable with endotracheal tube (ETT) according to airway protection against blood leakage through the fiberoptic bronchoscopy, oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and postoperative adverse events. METHODS: The present study was conducted in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled manner on 80 patients, who underwent septoplasty procedures under general anesthesia, after dividing them randomly into two groups according to the device used (LMA-S or ETT). The presence of blood in the airway (glottis/trachea, distal trachea) was analyzed with the fiberoptic bronchoscope and a four-point scale. Both groups were evaluated for OLP; HR; MAP; postoperative sore throat, nausea, and vomiting; dysphagia; and dysphonia. RESULTS: In the fiberoptic evaluation of the airway postoperatively, less blood leakage was detected in both anatomic areas in the LMA-S group than in the ETT group (glottis/trachea, p = 0.004; distal trachea, p = 0.034). Sore throat was detected less frequently in the LMA-S group at a significant level in the 2nd, 6th, and 12th hours of postoperative period; however, other adverse events were similar in both groups. Hemodynamic parameters were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that the LMA-S provided more effective airway protection than the ETT in preventing blood leakage in the septoplasty procedures. We believe that the LMA-S can be used safely and as an alternative to the ETT in septoplasty cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) # NCT03903679 on April 5, 2019.

Detrimental Effects of Filling Laryngotracheal Airways To Excessive Pressure (DEFLATE-P): a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: This quality improvement (QI) project was performed at a single center to determine the incidence of postoperative complications associated with use of cuffed airway devices. An educational program was then completed that involved training our anesthesia providers about complications related to excessive cuff pressure and how to utilize a quantitative cuff pressure measurement device (manometer). The impact of this educational initiative was assessed by comparing the incidence of postoperative complications associated with the use of airway devices before and after the training period. METHODS: After approval by our institution's Institutional Review Board, a pre-intervention (baseline) survey was obtained from 259 adult patients after having undergone surgery with general anesthesia with the use of an endotracheal tube (ETT) or laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Survey responses were used to determine the baseline incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia. Once these results were obtained, education was provided to the anesthesia department members addressing the complications associated with excessive cuff pressures, appropriate cuff pressures based on manufacturer recommendations, and instructions on the use of a quantitative monitor to determine cuff pressure (manometry). Clinical care was then changed by requiring intraoperative cuff pressure monitoring throughout our institution for all surgical patients. After this educational period, 299 patients completed the same survey describing postoperative airway complications. RESULTS: The use of manometry reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe postoperative sore throat in the pre- vs. post-intervention groups (35 patients vs 31 patients, p = 0.045), moderate to severe hoarseness (30 patients vs 13, patients p = 0.0001), and moderate-to-severe dysphagia (13 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Caring for patients in the perioperative setting frequently entails placement of an airway device. This procedure is associated with several potential complications, including sore throat, coughing, and vocal cord damage. Our quality improvement initiative has shown that intraoperative management of intra-cuff pressure based on manometry is feasible to implement in clinical practice and can reduce postoperative airway complications.

Laryngeal mask airway reduces incidence of post-operative sore throat after thyroid surgery compared with endotracheal tube: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a remarkable complication after thyroid surgery with endotracheal tube (ETT). Many studies revealed that laryngeal mask airway (LMA) might reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat. However, little is known about the use of a flexible reinforced LMA (FLMA) in thyroid surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential benefits of FLMA compared with ETT on postoperative sore throat. METHODS: In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, ninety-six patients aged 20-80 years, scheduled for elective radical thyroidectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomly divided into ETT group and FLMA group. All the included patients received total intravenous anesthesia (with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium) and controlled mechanical ventilation during the surgery. Cuff pressure of ETT and FLMA were strictly controlled. Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat, numbness and hoarseness at 1, 24, and 48 h after surgery was evaluated and compared between the two groups. Incidence and severity of buckling during extubation and the hemodynamic profile during intubation were also recorded and compared. RESULTS: The incidence of sore throat and hoarseness was significantly lower in FLMA group than those in ETT group at 1 h, 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, as well as the severity of sore throat. Compared to ETT group, there was a significantly lower incidence of buckling during extubation and less fluctuation of HR and BP at 1 min and 3 min after intubation in FLMA group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing thyroid surgery with FLMA had less postoperative laryngopharyngeal symptoms when compared with ETT. The use of FLMA also achieved less buckling during extubation and better hemodynamic profiles during intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-15006602) on May 23th, 2015.

Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine, Dexamethasone, and Their Combination on Postoperative Sore Throat: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST), hoarseness, and cough after tracheal intubation are not uncommon. Although both lidocaine and dexamethasone have been used independently to reduce these events, there is no study assessing the combined effects of lidocaine and dexamethasone. METHODS: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study enrolled 180 patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation for >90 minutes. They received 1 of the 4 intravenous agents just before induction of anesthesia: lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in group L, dexamethasone (8 mg) in group D, lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) with dexamethasone (8 mg) in group DL, and placebo as normal saline in group NS. Standard anesthesia protocol was followed. Incidence and severity of a sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice were assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of POST, and the main effects of dexamethasone and lidocaine were the primary interest. RESULTS: Data of 45 patients in D, 44 in L, 44 in DL, and 43 in NS groups were analyzed. The incidence of a sore throat was 36%, 43%, 25%, and 56% in group D, L, DL, and NS, respectively (P = .02). Dexamethasone with or without lidocaine reduced the incidence of the POST (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.82; P < .01). However, lidocaine was not effective in reducing POST (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.14; P = .12). No difference was observed in the severity of a sore throat, incidence and severity of a cough, and hoarseness among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone, with or without lidocaine, was effective in reducing the incidence of POST in patients requiring prolonged tracheal intubation.

Lidocaine lubricants for intubation-related complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a relatively common morbidity. Topical lidocaine lubricants have been proposed to prevent POST; however, their effectiveness remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of lidocaine lubrications against POST, cough, and hoarseness in adult patients after surgery. METHODS: Randomized-controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry that were published from inception until 26 March 2018 were included that compared the effectiveness of lidocaine lubricants with that of controls in preventing the incidence of overall POST and moderate to severe POST (POSTMS) at the first and 24th postoperative hour (POST-1h, POST-24h, POSTMS-1h, and POSTMS-24h). Postoperative cough and hoarseness at the 24th postoperative hour were also studied. Bias assessment and subgroup, sensitivity, and trial sequential analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Fourteen randomized-controlled trials (n = 2146) were selected. The incidences of POST-1h and POST-24h were 41.1 % and 22.6 % for the lidocaine group, and 41.9% and 23.5% for the control group, respectively. No effect was found on any of the outcome measurements. The overall risk ratios were 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.51) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.37 to 3.02) for the incidence of POST-1h and POSTMS-1h, respectively; 0.99 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.17) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.16 to 1.50) for POST-24h and POSTMS-24h, respectively; and, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.66) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.66 to1.24) for postoperative cough (PC)-24h and postoperative hoarseness (PH)-24h, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine lubricants applied on the tips of endotracheal tube are not effective against the morbidities of POST, PC, and PH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42017073259); registered 26 October, 2017.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les maux de gorge postopératoires sont une morbidité relativement fréquente. Les lubrifiants topiques à base de lidocaïne ont été proposés pour prévenir les maux de gorge postopératoires, mais leur efficacité demeure incertaine. Cette méta-analyse avait pour objectif d'évaluer l'effet prophylactique des lubrifications de lidocaïne contre les maux de gorge postopératoires, la toux et l'enrouement de la voix chez les patients adultes après une chirurgie. MéTHODE: Nous avons inclus les études randomisées contrôlées publiées sur PubMed, Embase, la Cochrane Library et le registre de ClinicalTrials.gov entre leur création et le 26 mars 2018 qui comparaient l'efficacité des lubrifiants à base de lidocaïne par rapport à l'absence de traitement pour prévenir l'incidence des maux de gorge postopératoires globaux et des maux de gorge postopératoires modérés à graves à la première et à la vingt-quatrième heure postopératoire (POST-1h, POST-24h, POSTMS-1h, et POSTMS-24h). La toux et l'enrouement à 24 heures postopératoires ont également été étudiés. Des analyses d'évaluation du biais et de sous-groupe, de sensibilité et des analyses séquentielles d'essais ont également été réalisées. RéSULTATS: Quatorze études randomisées contrôlées (n = 2146) ont été sélectionnées. Les incidences de POST-1h et de POST-24h étaient de 41,1 % et 22,6 % dans le groupe lidocaïne, et de 41,9 % et 23,5 % dans le groupe témoin, respectivement. Aucun effet n'a été observé pour aucun de nos critères d'évaluation. Les rapports de risque globaux étaient de 1,11 (intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 0,82 à 1,51) et de 1,06 (IC 95 %, 0,37 à 3,02) pour l'incidence de POST-1h et de POSTMS-1h, respectivement; de 0,99 (IC 95 %, 0,83 à 1,17) et de 0,49 (IC 95 %, 0,16 à 1,50) pour les POST-24h et POSTMS-24h, respectivement; et de 1,09 (IC 95 %, 0,71 à 1,66) et 0,91 (IC 95 %, 0,66 à 1,24) pour la toux postopératoire (PC)-24h et l'enrouement postopératoire (PH)-24h, respectivement. CONCLUSION: Les lubrifiants à base de lidocaïne appliqués sur l'extrémité distale du tube endotrachéal ne sont pas efficaces pour prévenir les morbidités de maux de gorge, de toux et d'enrouement postopératoires. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42017073259); enregistrée le 26 octobre 2017.

Maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 mmHg during anterior cervical spine surgery to prevent dysphagia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Anterior cervical spine surgery is associated with postoperative dysphagia, sore throat and dysphonia. It is unclear, whether this is caused by increased endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure after retractor placement. This study aims to assess the effect of ETT cuff pressure adjustment on postoperative dysphagia, sore throat and dysphonia. METHODS: In this, single-centre, observer and patient-blinded randomized controlled trial patients treated with anterior cervical spine surgery were randomized to adjustment of the ETT cuff pressure to 20 mmHg after placement of the retractor versus no adjustment. Primary outcome was the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcomes were sore throat and dysphonia. Outcomes were evaluated on day one and 2 months after the operation. RESULTS: Of 177 enrolled patients, 162 patients (92.5%) could be evaluated. The incidence of dysphagia was 75.9% on day one and 34.6% 2 months after surgery. Dysphagia in the intervention and control group was present in 77.8% versus 74.1% of patients on day one (odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.6-2.5)) and 28.4% versus 40.7% of patients after 2 months (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.1), respectively. Severity of dysphagia, sore throat and dysphonia was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior cervical spine surgery is accompanied by a high incidence of postoperative dysphagia, lasting until at least 2 months after surgery in over a third of our patients. Adjusting ETT cuff pressure to 20 mmHg after retractor placement, as compared to controls, did not lower the risk for both short- and long-term dysphagia. Netherlands National Trial Registry Number: NTR 3542. These slides can be retrieved under electronic supplementary material.

Ultrasound guided superior laryngeal nerve block as an adjuvant to generalanesthesia during endoscopic laryngeal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

INTRODUCTION: Blindly administered bilateral (B/L) superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) blocks, have been used to decrease the perioperative stress response of endoscopic laryngosurgeries. Use of ultrasound (USG) for giving these blocks is more likely to be successful, with fewer complications. We evaluated the efficacy of USG guided B/L SLN block in decreasing perioperative cough, sore-throat and hoarseness of voice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was conducted on forty patients undergoing endoscopic laryngosurgery under GA. Patients were randomized into two groups of 20 patients each. Patients in group C received GA, whereas those in group L received USG-guided SLN block bilaterally with 2.5 ml of 2% lignocaine, along with GA. Postoperative cough, sore throat and hoarseness of voice was measured at 30 min, 2 h, 4 h and 24 h following transfer to post-anesthesia care unit. RESULTS: Patients receiving SLN block had significantly lower incidence of perioperative cough (20% in group L vs 90% in group C; p value - 0.0001) as well as sore throat (5% in group L vs 95% in group C; p value - 0.0001). In these patients, severity of hoarseness of voice was greater in the early postoperative period (100% in group L vs 70% in group C; p value - 0.027), while it decreased significantly at 24 h postoperatively(0.0% in group L vs 30% in group C; p value - 0.027). CONCLUSION: USG guided SLN block as an adjuvant to GA resulted in better recovery profile of the patients with significant reduction in postoperative cough, sore throat and hoarseness of voice.

A method for addressing right upper lobe obstruction with right-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes during surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A right-sided double-lumen tube (R-DLT) tends to obstruct the right upper lobe intraoperatively due to anatomical distortion during surgery. If the R-DLT is poorly matched with the patient's airway anatomy, it will not be possible to correctly replace the tube with a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB). In our study, we aimed to explore an efficient method for difficult repositioning caused by right upper lobe occlusion during surgery: repositioning the R-DLT from the right main bronchus into the left main bronchus. The current study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of this method. METHODS: Sixty adult patients scheduled to undergo left-sided thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. With the patient in the right lateral position during surgery, the R-DLT was pulled back to the trachea while being rotated 90° clockwise; it was then either rotated 90° clockwise for placement into the left main bronchus (Group L) or rotated 90° anticlockwise and returned to the right main bronchus (Group R) using FOB guidance. The primary outcomes included clinical performance, which was measured by intubation time, and the quality of lung collapse. A secondary outcome was safety, which was determined according to bronchial injury and vocal cord injury. RESULTS: The median intubation time (IQR [range]) required for placement of a R-DLT into the left main bronchus was shorter than the time required for placement into the right main bronchus (15.0 s [IQR, 12.0 to 20.0 s]) vs 23.5 s [IQR, 14.5 to 65.8 s], P = 0.005). The groups showed comparable overall results for the quality of lung collapse during the total period of one-lung ventilation (P = 1.000). The numbers of patients with bronchial injuries or vocal cord injuries were also comparable between groups (Group R, 11/30 vs. Group L 8/30, P = 0.580 for bronchus injuries; Group R, 15/30 vs. Group L 13/30, P = 0.796 for vocal cord injuries). CONCLUSIONS: Repositioning a R-DLT from the right main bronchus into the left main bronchus had good clinical performance without causing additional injury. This may be an efficient method for the difficult repositioning of a R-DLT due to right upper lobe occlusion during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-15006933 , registered on 15 August 2015.

Combined intraoperative paracetamol and preoperative dexamethasone reduces postoperative sore throat: a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative sore throat (POST) after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is a common and undesirable complication. In this study, we evaluated the combined effects of paracetamol and dexamethasone on the prevention of POST in patients after general anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 226 patients scheduled for urologic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the DexaPara group (n = 113), dexamethasone (10 mg) and paracetamol (1000 mg) was infused. In the Dexa group (n = 113), dexamethasone (10 mg) alone was given. POST, hoarseness, and dysphagia were monitored. The postoperative wound pain score and perioperative opioid requirements were compared. In addition, complications related to opioids were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The overall incidence of POST was lower in the DexaPara group than in the Dexa group [42 (37%) vs. 72 (64%), p < 0.001]. The incidence of POST while resting at postoperative 1 and 6 h was lower in the DexaPara group than in the Dexa group (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively). The incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, shivering, and headache was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Paracetamol and dexamethasone infusion reduced the incidence of POST without serious complications in patients for urologic surgery under general anesthesia.

[Spacer, Aerosol Therapy through Space and Time]. / Spacer, Aerosoltherapie durch Raum und Zeit.

Aim of the literature review Within this review, results of a literature analysis on the application of spacers with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) are described and evaluated. Methods Next to an extensive revision on effects of spacers, the impacts of current guidelines and the conditions for product authorisations on the use of spacers are described which result from the interplay of characteristics from dose inhalers with a spacer. Results Spacers are generally useful to avoid coordination problems concerning the actuation of a pMDI at the beginning of an inhalation. Furthermore, in comparison to the pMDI application without a spacer a reduced mouth-throat deposition is applicable to all pMDI spacer combinations. However, some new pMDI release the aerosol in a quality that may not necessarily require a spacer to avoid a high drug deposition in the mouth-throat area as the aerosol quality will not be greatly improved with a spacer. The delivered mass of the active ingredient as well as the aerosol quality released from a spacer vary substantially with the use of different spacers. A change of spacer while using the same dose inhaler can maximally result in a doubling or halving of the quantity of the active ingredient applied. These facts are nowadays considered by the European regulatory agency. Conclusion If a spacer application is intended for pMDIs that were developed and approved after 2009, the correspondent SMP (Summary of Product Characteristics) should at least make one specific recommendation for a spacer that should be based upon relevant in vitro data or additional in vivo data. If a different spacer than the recommended one is used, the effectively applied dose cannot be correctly anticipated. This should be considered when choosing a spacer.

The effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and vocal cord injuries: a prospective double-blind randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that thermal softening of polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes reduces nasal damage during nasotracheal intubation. We hypothesized that thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) may be effective for reducing airway injury. This randomized double-blind study was performed to investigate whether thermal softening of DLTs decreased postoperative sore throat, hoarseness or vocal cord injuries. METHODS: Patients (n=140) undergoing one lung anaesthesia were randomized into two groups (n=70 each) depending on whether the DLT was softened by warming or not before tracheal intubation. The DLTs were placed in warm saline [40(1)°C] in the thermal softening group or in room temperature saline in the control group for 10 min. The vocal cords were examined by using flexible laryngoscopy immediately after extubation. Sore throat and hoarseness were evaluated for three postoperative days. The primary outcomes were the incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, and vocal cord injuries. RESULTS: Sore throat and vocal cord injuries occurred less frequently in the thermal softening group than in the control group [14/70 vs 27/70, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.52 (0.30-0.90), P=0.025 for sore throat; 15/70 vs 27/70, risk ratio (95% CI): 0.56 (0.32-0.95), P=0.042 for vocal cord injuries]. However, the incidence of hoarseness was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Tracheal intubation with DLTs softened by warming decreased the postoperative incidence of sore throat and vocal cord injuries. Therefore, thermal softening of DLTs before intubation seems to be helpful in reducing airway injuries associated with DLT intubation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 01626365.

Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated. METHODS: This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1.

Early laryngeal outcome of prolonged intubation using an anatomical tube: a double blind, randomised study.

The objective of this study was to study the short-term impact on larynx by a newly designed anatomical tube. A prospective randomised trial of a newly designed anatomical tube versus a standard endotracheal tube in patients operated under general anaesthesia for at least 12 h. Seventy adults were included and randomised to either type of tube. The patients were evaluated by means of fibre-optic laryngoscopy and VAS-rating of symptoms on two occasions in the first post-operative week. The evaluating investigators and the patients were blinded to the type of tube used. 27 cases and 23 controls had complete data for evaluation. Age, gender and intubation times were comparable. Symptoms such as hoarseness, coughing, and pain were rated above 30 % of maximum during at least one of the first post-operative days by 21 and 19 patients, respectively. At the first examination (within 24 h), 38 % of patients in the anatomical tube group stated no hoarseness; compared to 13 % of the controls (p = 0.057). Fibre-optic laryngoscopy showed some kind of pathology in all the patients examined within 24 h of extubation. After 3-6 days, seven patients with the anatomical tube and four patients in the control group showed complete resolution of the lesions, and the changes were limited to redness in the vocal process area in another seven and four, respectively. The differences between the groups did not attain statistical significance. The study shows considerable short-term laryngeal morbidity after prolonged intubation, and the anatomical tube only showed an advantage concerning hoarseness. Further improvement of the endotracheal tubes and intubation routines are still needed.

Effect of prophylactic benzydamine hydrochloride on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness after tracheal intubation using a double-lumen endobronchial tube: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prophylactic effect of benzydamine hydrochloride (BH) spray on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness secondary to intubation with a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT). METHODS: Ninety-two adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery using DLT intubation were studied. The DLT cuff and oropharyngeal cavity were sprayed with normal saline (Group S; n = 46) or BH (Group BH; n = 46) prior to intubation. Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were evaluated at one, six, and 24 hr after surgery. Sore throat was evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Hoarseness was defined as a change in voice quality. RESULTS: Compared with Group S, postoperative sore throat occurred less frequently in Group BH at one hour (mean difference, 28.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7 to 45.1; P = 0.01), at six hours (mean difference, 32.6%; 95% CI, 12.6 to 49.2; P < 0.01), and at 24 hr (mean difference, 28.3%; 95% CI, 9.3 to 44.7; P = 0.01) after surgery. Group BH had lower VAS scores for postoperative sore throat at one hour (mean difference, 12.8; 95% CI, 4.9 to 20.7), at six hours (mean difference, 11.9; 95% CI, 4.8 to 19.1; P < 0.01), and at 24 hr (mean difference, 5.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 9.7; P = 0.01) after surgery. Hoarseness also occurred less frequently in Group BH at one hour (mean difference, 23.9%; 95% CI, 6.8 to 39.6; P = 0.01), at six hours (mean difference, 23.9%; 95% CI, 7.4 to 39.3; P = 0.01), and at 24 hr (mean difference, 21.7%; 95% CI, 5.5 to 37.0; P = 0.02) after surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic application of BH to the DLT cuff and oropharyngeal cavity reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and the incidence of hoarseness associated with DLT intubation. The trial was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0001068).

Anticholinergic Use Is a Major Risk Factor for Dysphonia.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that many cases of dysphonia of unclear etiology are a form of sicca caused by anticholinergic medication use, and we aim to determine their association. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a 6-month time period. Participants were drawn from a tertiary care laryngology practice within an academic institution. METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Patients rated the symptom of chronic hoarseness; scores were compared with participants' medication lists, comorbidities, age, and sex, and a multivariate logistic regression model was developed. Significance was set at P<.05. As a secondary analysis, participants rated a variety of other symptoms using the Voice Handicap Index-10, Reflux Symptom Index, and the GRBAS scale, which were likewise compared to anticholinergic use. RESULTS: Any patient taking at least 1 anticholinergic medication had a 2.32 increased odds (P=.03) of experiencing hoarseness. If the patient was taking 2 or more anticholinergic medications, those odds rose to 4.52 (P=.009). CONCLUSION: This is the first study, to our knowledge, that implicates medication use as a major risk factor for dysphonia of unclear etiology. An awareness of this association is invaluable when attributing cause to hoarseness and when considering treatment options.

[Glottis injection to improve voice function : Review of more than 500 operations]. / Stimmlippeninjektion zur Stimmverbesserung : Rückblick auf über 500 Operationen.

BACKGROUND: Hoarseness due to insufficient glottal closure can be treated by injection laryngoplasty (augmentation). Vocal fold injections can be performed as an in-office procedure or under general anesthesia. As injection materials have recently improved and different injection approaches are available, injection laryngoplasties are performed much more frequently. OBJECTIVES: Advantages and disadvantages of injection materials, laryngeal approaches, and differential indications are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature research and experience of more than 500 laryngeal injection procedures are provided. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Sophisticated use of available injection materials can provide a satisfying improvement of voice function with minimal patient discomfort. Adequate indication is mandatory for a favorable outcome. Further improvement regarding biocompatibility and the duration of injection materials is desirable.