Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands- A nationwide evaluation study.

AIMS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are eligible for first-line immune checkpoint inhibition if their tumour is positive for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) determined by the combined positive score (CPS). This nationwide study, using real-world data, investigated the developing PD-L1 testing landscape in the first 3 years after introduction of the test in HNSCC and examined interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates. METHODS: Pathology reports of HNSCC patients mentioning PD-L1 were extracted from the Dutch Pathology Registry (Palga). Tumour and PD-L1 testing characteristics were analysed per year and interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates was assessed using funnel plots with 95% confidence limits around the overall mean. RESULTS: A total of 817 PD-L1 tests were reported in 702 patients among 19 laboratories; 85.2% of the tests on histological material were stated to be positive. The national PD-L1 positivity rate differed significantly per year during the study period (79.7-89.9%). The use of the recommended 22C3 antibody increased from 59.9 to 74.3%. A total of 673 PD-L1 tests on histological material from 12 laboratories were analysed to investigate interlaboratory variation. Four (33%) deviated significantly from the national mean of PD-L1-positive cases using CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, while two (17%) deviated significantly for CPS ≥ 20 cut-off. CONCLUSION: In the first 3 years of PD-L1 assessment in HNSCC, the testing landscape became more uniform. However, interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates between Dutch laboratories was substantial. This implies that there is a need for further test standardisation to reduce this variation.

Evaluating the diagnostic performance of a large language model-powered chatbot for providing immunohistochemistry recommendations in dermatopathology.

BACKGROUND: Large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT have numerous applications. However, their effectiveness in dermatopathology has not been formally evaluated. Dermatopathological cases often require immunohistochemical workup. Here, we evaluate the performance of a chatbot in providing diagnostically useful information on immunohistochemistry relating to dermatological diseases. METHODS: We queried a commonly used chatbot for the immunophenotypes of 51 cutaneous diseases, including a diverse variety of epidermal, adnexal, hematolymphoid, and soft tissue entities. We requested it to provide references for each diagnosis. All tests were repeated, compiled, quantified, and then compared with established literature standards. RESULTS: Clustering analysis demonstrated that recommendations correlated with tumor type, suggesting chatbots can supply appropriate panels. However, a significant portion of recommendations were factually incorrect (13.9%). Citations were rarely clinically useful (24.5%). Many were confabulated (27.2%). Prompt responses for cutaneous adnexal lesions tended to be less accurate while literature references were less useful. Reference retrieval performance was associated with the number of PubMed entries per entity. CONCLUSIONS: This foundational study suggests that LLM-powered chatbots may be useful for generating immunohistochemical panels for dermatologic diagnoses. However, specific performance capabilities and biases must be considered. In addition, extreme caution is advised regarding the tendencies to fabricate material. Future models intentionally fine-tuned to augment diagnostic medicine may prove to be valuable.

Standardization of CD30 immunohistochemistry staining among three automated immunostaining platforms.

The identification of CD30 expression by immunohistochemistry is essential for the treatment of lymphomas using an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD30. However, no standardized protocol for CD30 staining has been available. In this study, we compared three common automated immunostaining platforms {Bond III (B III), Dako Omnis (DO) and Ventana BenchMark ULTRA (VBMU)}. A primary antibody for CD30, the Ber-H2 clone, was diluted 50- to 400-fold for B III and DO, and ready-to-use antibody was used for VBMU. An enhancement step using a linker was introduced in all protocols. First, several candidate dilutions were selected for each platform by staining six cases. These candidate conditions were then confirmed with 60 cases of various types of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs). The concordance rates of CD30 expression among platforms differed depending on cutoff values and antibody dilutions, except for anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The concordance rates among three platforms in the evaluation of "positive" or "negative" were 100% and 97% when the cutoff values were 1% and 10% respectively, if using 400-diluted antibody in B III and 100-diluted antibody in DO. This study demonstrated the feasibility of equalizing CD30 staining of PTCLs among different platforms by adjusting protocols.

Practical issues related to immunocytochemistry on cytological smears: Tips and recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and identifying markers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapies. While cell blocks (CBs) are preferred for standardization and optimized staining, cytological smears are an alternative when CBs are unavailable. However, the literature on ICC protocols for smears is sparse. This review addresses preparation, fixation and protocols for nuclear and cytoplasmic antibodies on smears, drawing from our laboratory's experience. METHODS: We reviewed procedures for ICC on cytological smears using existing literature and practical insights from our laboratory. RESULTS: Commercially available antibodies were found to be reliable for ICC on smears if specimens are properly prepared and fixed. Protocols developed in our laboratory maintained antigenicity and provided clear staining results. CONCLUSIONS: Although ICC on CBs is the gold standard for standardization, cytological smears are a viable alternative when CBs are unavailable. Success in ICC on smears depends on proper preparation and fixation. This review offers practical protocols and insights to help laboratories optimize ICC on cytological smears. Further research and standardization are necessary to enhance reproducibility and reliability of ICC on smears. The practical information provided is based on personal experience in our laboratory.

A new tool for technical standardization of the Ki67 immunohistochemical assay.

Ki67, a nuclear proliferation-related protein, is heavily used in anatomic pathology but has not become a companion diagnostic or a standard-of-care biomarker due to analytic variability in both assay protocols and interpretation. The International Ki67 Working Group in breast cancer has published and has ongoing efforts in the standardization of the interpretation of Ki67, but they have not yet assessed technical issues of assay production representing multiple sources of variation, including antibody clones, antibody formats, staining platforms, and operators. The goal of this work is to address these issues with a new standardization tool. We have developed a cell line microarray system in which mixes of human Karpas 299 or Jurkat cells (Ki67+) with Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) (Ki67-) cells are present in incremental standardized ratios. To validate the tool, six different antibodies, including both ready-to-use and concentrate formats from six vendors, were used to measure Ki67 proliferation indices using IHC protocols for manual (bench-top) and automated platforms. The assays were performed by three different laboratories at Yale and analyzed using two image analysis software packages, including QuPath and Visiopharm. Results showed statistically significant differences in Ki67 reactivity between each antibody clone. However, subsets of Ki67 assays using three clones performed in three different labs show no significant differences. This work shows the need for analytic standardization of the Ki67 assay and provides a new tool to do so. We show here how a cell line standardization system can be used to normalize the staining variability in proliferation indices between different antibody clones in a triple negative breast cancer cohort. We believe that this cell line standardization array has the potential to improve reproducibility among Ki67 assays and laboratories, which is critical for establishing Ki67 as a standard-of-care assay.

Comparison of breast cancer surrogate subtyping using a closed-system RT-qPCR breast cancer assay and immunohistochemistry on 100 core needle biopsies with matching surgical specimens.

BACKGROUND: Routine clinical management of breast cancer (BC) currently depends on surrogate subtypes according to estrogen- (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor, Ki-67, and HER2-status. However, there has been growing demand for reduced immunohistochemistry (IHC) turnaround times. The Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4* Assay (STRAT4)*, a standardized test for ESR1/PGR/MKi67/ERBB2 mRNA biomarker assessment, takes less than 2 hours. Here, we compared the concordance between the STRAT4 and IHC/SISH, thereby evaluating the effect of method choice on surrogate subtype assessment and adjuvant treatment decisions. METHODS: In total, 100 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded core needle biopsy (CNB) samples and matching surgical specimens for 98 patients with primary invasive BC were evaluated using the STRAT4 assay. The concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was calculated for individual markers for the CNB and surgical specimens. In addition, we investigated whether changes in surrogate BC subtyping based on the STRAT4 results would change adjuvant treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The overall percent agreement (OPA) between STRAT4 and IHC/SISH ranged between 76 and 99% for the different biomarkers. Concordance for all four biomarkers in the surgical specimens and CNBs was only 66 and 57%, respectively. In total, 74% of surgical specimens were concordant for subtype, regardless of the method used. IHC- and STRAT4-based subtyping for the surgical specimen were shown to be discordant for 25/98 patients and 18/25 patients would theoretically have been recommended a different adjuvant treatment, primarily receiving more chemotherapy and trastuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of data from IHC/in situ hybridization and STRAT4 demonstrated that subsequent changes in surrogate subtyping for the surgical specimen may theoretically result in more adjuvant treatment given, primarily with chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

Evaluation of E-Cadherin and ß-Catenin Immunoreactivity for Determining Undifferentiated Cells in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: An immunohistochemical study has occasionally been performed to diagnose anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). However, antibodies to confirm the undifferentiated nature of ATC have not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate E-cadherin and ß-catenin expressions in immunoreactivity to determine undifferentiated carcinoma cells in the diagnosis of ATC. METHODS: We immunohistochemically examined 29 ATCs, 30 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDTCs), 22 well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas (WDTCs), and 3 squamous cell carcinomas. Antibodies for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), paired-box gene 8 (PAX8), ß-catenin, and E-cadherin were used. RESULTS: All WDTCs tested positive for TTF-1, PAX8, and E-cadherin. The positive rates of TTF-1, PAX8, and E-cadherin were 93.3, 93.3, and 100%, respectively, in PDTCs and 17.2, 51.7, and 10.3%, respectively, in ATCs. WDTC expressed the lateral cell membrane staining for ß-catenin and E-cadherin, whereas PDTC showed circumferential cell membranous expression (fishnet pattern). ß-catenin cell membrane expression in ATCs is lost or discontinuous. Carcinoma cells with ß-catenin nuclear expression without cell membranous expression were scattered in 72.4% of ATCs but were not observed in the other carcinomas. CONCLUSION: We propose 3 immunohistochemical findings to determine undifferentiated carcinoma cells in the diagnosis of ATC: (1) ß-catenin nuclear expression with no or reduced cell membranous expression, (2) the loss or discontinuous pattern of E-cadherin expression, and (3) the loss of PAX8 nuclear expression.

"Interchangeability" of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to address PD-L1 assay interchangeability based on assay diagnostic accuracy for established clinical uses/purposes. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed platform was conducted using "PD-L1" as a search term for 01/01/2015 to 31/08/2018, with limitations "English" and "human". 2,515 abstracts were reviewed to select for original contributions only. 57 studies on comparison of two or more PD-L1 assays were fully reviewed. 22 publications were selected for meta-analysis. Additional data were requested from authors of 20/22 studies in order to enable the meta-analysis. Modified GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria were used for grading published evidence and designing data abstraction templates for extraction by reviewers. PRISMA was used to guide reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis and STARD 2015 for reporting diagnostic accuracy study. CLSI EP12-A2 was used to guide test comparisons. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of various PD-L1 assays. The 22 included studies provided 376 2×2 contingency tables for analyses. Results of our study suggest that, when the testing laboratory is not able to use an Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic(s) for PD-L1 assessment for its specific clinical purpose(s), it is better to develop a properly validated laboratory developed test for the same purpose(s) as the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic, than to replace the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic with a another PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic that was developed for a different purpose.

Intense basolateral membrane staining indicates HER2 positivity in invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma.

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma is characterized by the inside-out growth of tumor clusters and displays incomplete membrane immunostaining of HER2. According to the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2-testing recommendation, moderate to intense but incomplete staining could be scored as immunohistochemical 2+. Furthermore, the criteria of immunohistochemical 3+ for this staining pattern are not mentioned. One hundred and forty-seven cases of invasive micropapillary carcinoma with moderate-to-intense HER2 immunostaining were enrolled. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma components of all cases were scored as immunohistochemical 2+ based on the 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendation. The invasive micropapillary carcinoma component varied from 10% to 100% (mean, 80%). Invasive micropapillary carcinoma components of all 147 tumors exhibited reversed polarity and incomplete basolateral HER2 membrane staining. One hundred and seventeen of the tumors (80%, 117/147) had moderate staining, and 38 (32%, 38/117) showed HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. HER2 gene was amplified in all the remaining 30 tumors (20%, 30/147) that exhibited intense basolateral membrane staining. Besides, average HER2 signals per cell and ratio of HER2/CEP17 were significantly higher in the intense-staining tumors compared with the moderate-staining tumors (p < 0.0001). Follow-up data were available for 140 patients. None of the patients were died. The follow-up time ranged from 1 month to 99 months (median, 57 months). Thirteen (9%, 13/140) patients exhibited disease progression (recurrence or metastasis). HER2 gene amplification was correlated inversely with estrogen receptor (p = 0.000) and progesterone receptor (p = 0.000) expression, and positively with histological grade (p = 0.003) and disease progression (p = 0.000). Invasive micropapillary carcinoma with intense clear linear basolateral membrane immunostaining indicates HER2 positivity, even if the staining is incomplete. They should be classified as immunohistochemical 3+ rather than immunohistochemical 2+, which would avoid further fluorescence in-situ hybridization-testing procedure and greatly save the related time, labor, and financial costs. Ultimately, ensure all patients with HER2 gene amplification obtain effective targeted therapy in time.

Comparison of different anti-Ki67 antibody clones and hot-spot sizes for assessing proliferative index and grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours using manual and image analysis.

AIMS: Ki67 proliferative index (PI) is essential for grading gastroenteric and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs). Analytical and preanalytical variables can affect Ki67 PI. In contrast to counting methodology, until now little attention has focused on the question of clone equivalence and the effect of hot-spot size on Ki67 PI in GEP NETs. Using manual counting and image analysis, this study compared the Ki67 PI achieved using MM1, K2 and 30-9 to MIB1, a clone which has been validated for, and is referenced in, guidelines relating to assessment of Ki67 PI in GEP NETs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two pancreatic NETs were each immunohistochemically stained for the anti-Ki67 clones MIB1, MM1, K2 and 30-9. Ki67 PI was calculated manually and by image analysis, the latter using three different hot-spot sizes. In manual comparisons using single hot-spot high-power fields, non-MIB1 clones overestimated Ki67 PI compared to MIB1, resulting in grading discordances. Image analysis shows good agreement with manual Ki67 PI but a tendency to overestimate absolute Ki67 PI. Increasing the size of tumour hot-spot from 500 to 2000 cells resulted in a decrease in Ki67 PI. CONCLUSION: Different anti-Ki67 clones do not produce equivalent PIs in GEP NETs, and clone selection may therefore affect patient care. Increasing the hot-spot size decreases the Ki67 PI. Greater standardisation in terms of antibody clone selection and hot-spot size is required for grading GEP NETs. Image analysis is an effective tool for assisting Ki67 assessment and allows easier standardisation of the size of the tumour hot-spot.

Renal angiomyolipoma: Clinico-pathologic study of 17 cases with emphasis on the epithelioid histology and p53 gene abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) is a rare potentially malignant variant of renal angiomyolipoma (RAML). This study aims to determine whether RAML clinico-pathologic and molecular features (i.e. p53 gene abnormalities) differ significantly with regards to its histologic variant or to the presence of an epithelioid component within it. METHODS: Consecutively resected RAML were reviewed, tumours comprising at least 80% of epithelioid cells were considered as EAML according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the kidney. P53 gene abnormalities were investigated using both immunohistochemical and molecular analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3 EAML among 17 RAML were identified, accounting for 3.9% of the total AML cases. Fatty aspect on imaging was more observed within tumours devoid of an epithelioid component. EAML showed a higher mitotic rate and a stronger p53 staining, no renal poles involvement and was not treated by nephron sparing surgeries. RAML comprising an epithelioid component demonstrated severer nuclear atypia as well as stronger p53 staining. P53 gene sequencing revealed a missense mutation (c.747G > C) in one classic AML harbouring a strong labelling with p53. CONCLUSIONS: Strong p53 staining in a RAML, even in the absence of gene mutation, may suggest the presence of an epithelioid component or of a truly EAML. To the best of our knowledge, c.747G > C p53 gene mutation is being reported for the first time in a RAML, although its role in AML pathogenesis is still unknown.

[Immunohistochemistry-based predictive biomarkers for lung cancer]. / Immunhistochemiebasierte prädiktive Biomarker bei Lungenkarzinomen.

Predictive biomarkers play an important role in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Applied methods and technologies include molecular tests and immunohistochemistry. The latter is predominantly dedicated to the preselection of tumors for subsequent molecular analyses. Given the low prevalence of certain molecular subtypes, immunohistochemistry can contribute to a high efficacy of lung cancer diagnosis. Thus, immunohistochemistry plays a lasting and even increasing role in this context. Some assays allow a definitive predictive classification based on immunohistochemistry alone. Approval of novel therapeutics increases the number of immunohistochemistry-based predictive biomarkers. The high sensitivity of assays must be ensured by careful selection of diagnostic primary antibodies, thorough validation of staining protocols, and standardized evaluation and scoring.

Bmi-1 Immunohistochemical Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma is Correlated with Prognostic Activity.

Background and objectives: B-lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 (Bmi-1) is a stem cell factor that is overexpressed in various human cancer tissues. It has been implicated in cancer cell proliferation, cell invasion, distant metastasis, and chemosensitivity, and is associated with patient survival. Several reports have also identified Bmi-1 protein overexpression in endometrial carcinoma; however, the relationship between Bmi-1 expression and its significance as a clinicopathological parameter is still insufficiently understood. Accordingly, the present study aimed to clarify whether immunohistochemical staining for Bmi-1 in human endometrial carcinoma and normal endometrial tissues can be used as a prognostic and cell proliferation marker. Materials and Methods: Bmi-1 expression was assessed in endometrioid carcinoma (grade 1-3) and normal endometrial tissues (in the proliferative and secretory phases) by immunohistochemistry; protein expression was evaluated using the nuclear labeling index (%) in the hot spot. Furthermore, we examined other independent prognostic and proliferation markers, including the protein levels of Ki-67, p53, and cyclin A utilizing semi-serial sections of endometrial carcinoma tissues. Results: The expression of the Bmi-1 protein was significantly higher in all grades of endometrial carcinoma than in the secretory phase of normal tissues. Moreover, Bmi-1 levels tended to be higher in G2 and G3 tissues than in G1 tissue, without reaching significance. Bmi-1 expression showed no notable differences among International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages in endometrial carcinoma. Furthermore, we observed a significant positive relationship between Bmi-1 and Ki-67, cyclin A, or p53 by Spearman's rank correlation test, implying that high Bmi-1 expression can be an independent prognostic marker in endometrial carcinoma. Conclusions: Our study suggests that Bmi-1 levels in endometrial carcinoma tissues may be useful as a reliable proliferation and prognostic biomarker. Recently, the promise of anti-Bmi-1 strategies for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma has been detected. Our results provide fundamental data regarding this anti-Bmi-1 strategy.

ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect NTRK fusions in daily practice and clinical research.

BACKGROUND: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are present in a plethora of malignancies across different histologies. These fusions represent the most frequent mechanism of oncogenic activation of these receptor tyrosine kinases, and biomarkers for the use of TRK small molecule inhibitors. Given the varying frequency of NTRK1/2/3 fusions, crucial to the administration of NTRK inhibitors is the development of optimal approaches for the detection of human cancers harbouring activating NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts from several Institutions were recruited by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) to review the available methods for the detection of NTRK gene fusions, their potential applications, and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes in human malignancies. A consensus on the most reasonable strategy to adopt when screening for NTRK fusions in oncologic patients was sought, and further reviewed and approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership. RESULTS: The main techniques employed for NTRK fusion gene detection include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and both RNA-based and DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Each technique has advantages and limitations, and the choice of assays for screening and final diagnosis should also take into account the resources and clinical context. CONCLUSION: In tumours where NTRK fusions are highly recurrent, FISH, RT-PCR or RNA-based sequencing panels can be used as confirmatory techniques, whereas in the scenario of testing an unselected population where NTRK1/2/3 fusions are uncommon, either front-line sequencing (preferentially RNA-sequencing) or screening by immunohistochemistry followed by sequencing of positive cases should be pursued.

Overestimated Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Screening Cohorts With Registry-Based Follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Several recent studies have reported very high estimates of sensitivity and specificity of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) at seemingly high levels of precision using registry-based follow-up of participants in very large FIT-based screening programs. We aimed to assess the validity of estimates of diagnostic performance parameters derived by this indirect approach. METHODS: We modeled expected values of sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer detection in studies using the indirect approach and their deviation from true values under a broad range of plausible assumptions, and we compared these expected values with recently reported estimates of FIT sensitivity and specificity from such studies. RESULTS: Using a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.6% (from studies using a direct approach, i.e., colonoscopy follow-up of all participants), the indirect approach would be expected to yield sensitivities between 84.5% and 91.1% and specificities between 93.4% and 93.6% under a range of realistic assumptions regarding colonoscopic follow-up rates of positive FITs and clinical manifestation rates of preclinical colorectal cancer. DISCUSSION: Very high sensitivities of FITs recently reported with seemingly very high levels of precision by several large-scale registry-based studies, which are in line with expected results based on our model calculations, are likely to be strongly overestimated and need to be interpreted with due caution.

An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.

The nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 has potential prognostic, predictive, and monitoring roles in breast cancer. Unacceptable between-laboratory variability has limited its clinical value. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group investigated whether Ki67 immunohistochemistry can be analytically validated and standardized across laboratories using automated machine-based scoring. Sets of pre-stained core-cut biopsy sections of 30 breast tumors were circulated to 14 laboratories for scanning and automated assessment of the average and maximum percentage of tumor cells positive for Ki67. Seven unique scanners and 10 software platforms were involved in this study. Pre-specified analyses included evaluation of reproducibility between all laboratories (primary) as well as among those using scanners from a single vendor (secondary). The primary reproducibility metric was intraclass correlation coefficient between laboratories, with success considered to be intraclass correlation coefficient >0.80. Intraclass correlation coefficient for automated average scores across 16 operators was 0.83 (95% credible interval: 0.73-0.91) and intraclass correlation coefficient for maximum scores across 10 operators was 0.63 (95% credible interval: 0.44-0.80). For the laboratories using scanners from a single vendor (8 score sets), intraclass correlation coefficient for average automated scores was 0.89 (95% credible interval: 0.81-0.96), which was similar to the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% credible interval: 0.81-0.93) achieved using these same slides in a prior visual-reading reproducibility study. Automated machine assessment of average Ki67 has the potential to achieve between-laboratory reproducibility similar to that for a rigorously standardized pathologist-based visual assessment of Ki67. The observed intraclass correlation coefficient was worse for maximum compared to average scoring methods, suggesting that maximum score methods may be suboptimal for consistent measurement of proliferation. Automated average scoring methods show promise for assessment of Ki67 scoring, but requires further standardization and subsequent clinical validation.

Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.

AIMS: The nuclear proliferation marker Ki67 assayed by immunohistochemistry has multiple potential uses in breast cancer, but an unacceptable level of interlaboratory variability has hampered its clinical utility. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group has undertaken a systematic programme to determine whether Ki67 measurement can be analytically validated and standardised among laboratories. This study addresses whether acceptable scoring reproducibility can be achieved on excision whole sections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adjacent sections from 30 primary ER+ breast cancers were centrally stained for Ki67 and sections were circulated among 23 pathologists in 12 countries. All pathologists scored Ki67 by two methods: (i) global: four fields of 100 tumour cells each were selected to reflect observed heterogeneity in nuclear staining; (ii) hot-spot: the field with highest apparent Ki67 index was selected and up to 500 cells scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the global method [confidence interval (CI) = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.799-0.93] marginally met the prespecified success criterion (lower 95% CI ≥ 0.8), while the ICC for the hot-spot method (0.83; 95% CI = 0.74-0.90) did not. Visually, interobserver concordance in location of selected hot-spots varies between cases. The median times for scoring were 9 and 6 min for global and hot-spot methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The global scoring method demonstrates adequate reproducibility to warrant next steps towards evaluation for technical and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of cases. The time taken for scoring by either method is practical using counting software we are making publicly available. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the reproducibility between laboratories further.

Semi-Quantitative Impacts of Major Step on Antigen in Pre-Treatment Required for Immunohistochemistry.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of immunohistochemistry (IHC) pre-treatment steps on antigens. METHODS: Salmonella typhimurium was selected as the observed antigen. The antigen was subjected to IHC pre-treatment steps involving a series of reagents, including 10% formaldehyde, ethanol, and xylene. Antigenicity was then measured by agglutination reaction. RESULTS: The agglutination titer for S. typhimurium was higher in the untreated control group than in the experimental group, indicating that pre-treatment inhibited antigen activity. The inhibitory effect of ethanol was greater than that of 10% formaldehyde and xylene. Unexpectedly, partial antigen recovery can be achieved from a preparation of paraffin section after hydration. CONCLUSIONS: S. Antigens may be strongly inhibited (inhibition: 70.8%) by IHC pre-treatment steps, especially by alcohol treatment. There is an experimental foundation for antigen retrieval in IHC.

Avoiding pitfalls in diagnostic immunohistochemistry-important technical aspects that every pathologist should know.

This review focuses on technical aspects of diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC), with an emphasis on aspects of methodology and interpretation that may be problematic for practicing pathologists. Pitfalls in IHC are reviewed, and the importance of good controls and the the use of multi-tissue controls is discussed. Also covered is the optimal use of IHC in cytologic specimens and specimens where no paraffin block is available. Artifacts encountered in IHC are discussed and illustrated, and a number of useful techniques are described in detail, including preparation of multi-tissue control material, tissue and cell transfer techniques, and tissue protection techniques.

PD-L1 Detection-Pearls and Pitfalls Associated With Current Methodologies Focusing on Entities Relevant to Dermatopathology.

PD-L1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein with an extracellular as well as an intracellular cytoplasmic domain. Physiologically, it plays a pivotal role in regulating T-cell activation and tolerance. Many tumor cells have exploited this regulatory mechanism by overexpressing PD-L1 in an effort to escape immunologic surveillance. In this review, we parse the literature regarding the prognostic value of tumoral PD-L1 expression before discussing the various methodologies as well as the pearls and pitfalls associated with each for predicting response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Special attention is given to cutaneous entities in which PD-L1 expression has been documented with an emphasis on cutaneous malignancies that have seen the broadest applications of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapies. Currently, immunohistochemistry is the method that is most commonly used for detection of PD-L1. However, with the wide array of immunohistochemistry protocols and staining platforms available in the market, there seems to be different cutoffs not just for different entities but also for the same entity. This review is an attempt to address the need for standardization and validation of existing protocols for PD-L1 detection.